Unilateral offer: A unilateral offer is one which is mode to the world at large or public in general and may be accepted by any person who fulfils the requisite conditions.It is notable that unilateral offer can be accepted by one i.e. Acceptance is open for all.

Yes. though my understanding of Indian contract act 1872, Doraemons offer is a unilateral one and can be accepted by anyone along with the friends who where presents there .however, the acceptor (spongebob) of the contract has not followed some legal rules of the acceptance .were moving towards the doraemon & SpongeBob case with a rigorous of analysis the essential rules to acceptance offer in a valid mode according to the Indian contract act 1872.

Acceptance must be given only by the person to whom the offer is mode @with whom it imports an intention to contract. In case of general/unilateral offer the offer can be accepted by any person who has knowledge of the existence of the offer.Here in our case i.e. doreamon vs spongebob there is the validity of acceptance of spongebob as the spongeab had a clear knowledge regarding the offer.

Next to be a valid acceptor can it must be expressed in some usual @reasonable manner unless the proposal prescribes the manner in which it is to be accepted. it explains that acceptance does not include the silence as a mode of acceptance .It says that mental acceptance is ineffectual .The mental acceptance means that quiet assent not evidence by word or conduct does not amount to a valid acceptance .It the case of Dureamon vs spongebob the offer is mode correctly and spongebob has eligibility to accept the offer .however the acceptor (spongebob) has not communication to offeror (doraemon).Here the acceptance made by spongebob become invalid as there is no proof to accept that offer .In addition to that to be a valid contractual relation there must be a legal consideration according to the contract Act section 10.

First consideration must move at the desire of the promisor .to have a brief explanation, in order to constitute legal consideration, the act or abstinence forming the consider Asian for the promise must be done at the desire or request of the promisor .thus acts done or services rendered voluntarily or at the desire of third party, will not amount to valid consideration so as to support a contract according to this vote it can beside that in the case of Doreomon & Spongebob, response as if the humanitarian aspects. SpongeBob rescued the child even though Doreomon shorts for revocation of the ofer .however, I will make a short explanation of proper revocation in later. Though spongebob has saved the child it seems to me that spongebob rather to get the money or accept the offer he have done it voluntarily from this point spongebob cannot claim the amount from Doreoman.Finally, an offer can be revoked by the offer or. According to the revocation of an offer (section#6) there must be following circumstances-an offer lapses after stipulated or reasonable time.

-An offer lapse by not being accepted in the mode prescribed or if no mode is prescribed ,in some usual & reasonable manner .

-An offer lapses by death or insanity of the offeror or the offeree before acceptance.-An offer lapses by revocation

-revocation by non-fulfillment of a condition precedent to acceptance.-An offer lapses by mob sequent illegality or destruction of mobility matter.

Now in the case of Douraemon VS Spongebob the offeror (Doraemon) has might to revoke the offer under the section (6/1).Indian contract act 1872 of section (6/1).Indian contract act 1872 of section (6/1)explains that an offer may be revoked . at any time before acceptance , by the communication of notice of revocation by the offeror to their party. More importantly revocation of a unilateral offer.

Can be revoked through the some channel by which the original offer was made. yes the offer to general However an offer cannot be revoked when the acceptor (spongebob) engaged to fulfill the condition to engaged to fulfill the condition to engaged to fulfil the condition to accept the offer. At that time , the offer is continuing .in this case of Daraemon Vs Spongebob case of Daraemon VS Spongebob when Doraemon was shoting at that time spongebob was engaged himself to swim accors the uiver. so as the spongebob was engaged in the offer there is no possibility to revoke the offer.

To be made a contractual relations the different sections like 10.29& 56 of Indian contract Act explains the following elements have to exist-

-offer& acceptance

-intension to create legal relation

-lawful consideration

-capacity of parties

-Free consent

-lawful object

-Writing @ negintnsion

-Certainty-Possibility of performance

-cot expressly declared void

To sum up in the case of doraemon vs spongebob the offer was madeaccordingly .however the spongebob acceptance has last the important elements that was not to communication with the Doraemon(offeror).Furthermore the lawful elements of consideration.

i.e spongebob voluntary work cannot claim the consideration offered by Dareamon. most interestingly, the revocation by Doraemon was not also in a proper way that is explained in the contract Act1872 of section 6.

Finally I can say that with the observation of legal points approp to the case .Doraemon Vs Spongebob from the view of Indian contract Act 1872 spongebob cannot claim tee take 20000 from Doreamon.