burns et al. 2011. male reproductive traits and their relationship to reproductive traits in their
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Burns Et Al. 2011. Male Reproductive Traits and Their Relationship to Reproductive Traits in Their
1/20
Review Article
Male Reproductive Traits and Their Relationship to Reproductive Traits in Their
Female Progeny: A Systematic Review
BM Burns1, C Gazzola2, RG Holroyd2, J Crisp3 and MR McGowan3
1The University of Queensland, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia;2Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia; 3The University of Queensland, School ofVeterinary Science, Gatton, Qld, Australia
Contents
The overall objective of one of the major research programs inthe Co-operative Research Centre (CRC) for Beef GeneticTechnologies is to Improve female reproductive performance
in tropical, northern Australian beef cattle herds. To addressthis overall objective, a quantitative genetics project focusedon investigation of male reproductive traits was designed andlinked to three female reproductionfocussed projects, (i)discovery of genes associated with post-partum re-conceptionand age at puberty; (ii) expression of genes associated withpost-partum re-conception; and (iii) early predictors of lifetimefemale reproductive performance. During the initial planningof this male reproductive traits project, the CRC ScientificReview Committee recommended that the research teaminvestigate and evaluate potentially new, early-life (i.e ableto be measured before 2 years of age) predictors of both maleand female reproductive performance. To address this recom-mendation, the following was carried out: (i) criteria forselection of traditional and candidate traits were established;
(ii) methodology for tabulation of potential traitsphenotypesthat define male and female reproductive function wasdeveloped; and (iii) a systematic scientific review of early-lifepredictors of male and female fertility was prepared. Thisreview concluded that although factors that might be useful inpredicting male reproductive performance have been studiedfor many years, there was relatively little useful informationavailable to meet the objectives of this review. It was alsoconcluded that the direction of future research should beguided not only by previous research which was scarce, butalso by speculative hypotheses arising from an understandingof the physiological, endocrinological and genetic processesactive in reproduction. A small number of new traits wererecommended in addition to traditional sperm morphology,sexual behaviour, anatomical structure and growth traits.
Potential additional traits include measurement of gonadotro-phin-releasing hormone-stimulated luteinizing hormone(GnRH-stimulated LH); inhibin; several seminal plasma pro-teins (osteopontin, spermadhesin and seminal plasma proteinsBSP30 and phospholipase A2 could be used in an index); 11b-hydroxysteriod dehydrogenase; and leptin. In addition, thepotential also exists to screen animals for a number of geneticmarkers associated with age of puberty, follicular recruitmentand ovulation rate and genes associated with bovine seminalplasma protein and testosterone production. Insulin-likegrowth factor-1 (IGF-1) measurements are included becauseof their association with growth parameters, and an additionalanalysis demonstrated associations with male and femalereproductive traits. Some of these factors have been previouslyevaluated in small numbers of animals of various species under
intensive management conditions. Therefore, there is a need toevaluate these factors in much larger numbers of beef cattlegrazing semi-extensive tropical production systems in northern
Australia to determine their value in improving beef cattleenterprise profitability through improved herd fertility.
IntroductionA major limitation to northern Australian beef cattleherds is that direct selection for cow fertility can onlybe applied to females, usually at low intensities, andrelatively late in life when the cows have one or twocalving records (Mackinnon et al. 1989). This problemcould be overcome if herd traits in males wereidentified that were genetically correlated to femalefertility traits, and these male traits were able to bemeasured early in life (Mackinnon et al. 1989). Inaddition, Walkley and Smith (1980) reported in sheepthat if a trait could be identified in young males,which was correlated with the reproductive perfor-mance of adult females, the potential would exist todouble the selection intensity, and therefore the rate ofgenetic change, by selecting in both males andfemales.
Land (1973) proposed that because the hormonalcontrol of reproductive function is similar in the twosexes, one might expect that male and female reproduc-tive traits would be closely correlated genetically.Darwash et al. (1999) have also reported that there isa growing body of evidence suggesting that the majorityof endocrine factors associated with reproduction indairy cattle are a result of differential gene expression inthe hypothalamus, pituitary, ovary and uterus.
In conclusion, it may be possible to identify early-life
predictors of fertility both phenotypically (a bullsfertility as reflected by improved calf output) andgenetically (the fertility of a bulls female and maleprogeny). To further investigate the potential use of thisapproach to improve the reproductive performance ofbeef cattle, in particular tropically adapted genotypes, asystematic review of the published literature on malereproductive traits and their relationship to reproductivetraits in their female progeny was conducted.
Objective of the Review
To identify male traits potentially genetically correlatedwith female fertility traits, with particular emphasis on
identifying traits which could be assessed in pre-pubertalbulls.
Reprod Dom Anim 46, 534553 (2011); doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01748.x
ISSN 0936-6768
The State of Queensland (through the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation) 2011
-
8/11/2019 Burns Et Al. 2011. Male Reproductive Traits and Their Relationship to Reproductive Traits in Their
2/20
Materials and Methods
The systematic review was conducted as follows:
1. Publications were reviewed to examine the rela-tionship between various bovine male traits and thefertility of the male andor the fertility of his male or
female offspring. Non-bovine mammalian publica-tions were also examined.2. The search was restricted to testicular, seminal andhormonal traits only as mating behaviour can only bemeasured reliably in sexually mature bulls.3. Those publications that quantified the relationshipbetween measured traits and fertility and providedestimates of the heritability of traits and the geneticcorrelations between male and female traits wereexamined in detail.4. Traits that, from a developmental (embryological)or physiological (endocrinological) point of view,have the potential to predict both male and female
reproductive function were considered.The selection criteria for candidate early-life predic-
tors of male fertility and fertility of male and femaleoffspring were as follows:
1. Male traits that were moderately heritable andmoderately genetically correlated with female traitswere given an initial high ranking.2. Consideration was given to potential novel traitswhose case for selection could be based on thetheoretical potential of the trait to predict fertilitybased on whatever direct or derived knowledge wasavailable.3. Traits were grouped according to those that could
be measured in the pre-pubertal bull and those thatcould only be measured after the bull reachedpuberty. Within each of these categories, traits werefurther grouped according to their capacity to assessone of the followings:
(i) Testicular development;(ii) Endocrine control of testis function;(iii) Spermatogenesis; and(iv) Fertilizing potential of sperm.
4. Traits that require sampling methods that arehighly invasive, require multiple samples to becollected and are very expensive or detrimental tothe future fertility of the animal were given an initiallow ranking.
Results and Discussion
The findings from this systematic review have beensummarized to four tables (Tables 14) under thefollowing headings:
1. Male reproductive traits and their relationship toother measures of reproductive function in the male.2. Male phenotypic traits and their correlated traits infemale progeny.3. Heritability of male traits and correlated femaleprogeny traits.
4. Genetic markers of male reproductive traits witheffects on female progeny.
Age-corrected scrotal circumference was consistentlyreported to be a useful method of assessing reproductivefunction in bulls (Table 1) because of the favourablerelationship with a number of sperm traits (Brinks et al.1978) and fertility (Mackinnon et al. 1990b). Pre-pubertal basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone
(FSH) concentration was identified as a potentialcandidate trait because of its role in the endocrinecontrol of testicular function and its moderate correla-tion with Sertoli cell number (Moura and Erickson1997) (Table 1). The reported moderate correlationbetween pre-pubertal basal serum luteinizing hormone(LH) concentration and age of puberty also suggestedthat this trait may be a useful early-life predictor offertility (Aravindakshan et al. 2000) (Table 1). How-ever, these measurements require multiple samplingunder commercial industry conditions.
In contrast, GnRH-stimulated release of LH in pre-pubertal bulls reported by Moura and Erickson (1997)
and Bagu et al. (2006) may be a practical alternative(Table 1). This test is simpler than multiple samplings asit requires an initial pre-injection blood sample, followedby an injection of GnRH analogue, and a subsequentsingle 0.5 to 1 hourly blood sample. However, there areonly a small number of publications describing the useof this test, and except for one study in bulls from1626 months of age (Perry et al. 1990a), most studieshave only monitored the bulls to yearling age (Mouraand Erickson 1997; Bagu et al. 2006) (Table 1). Perryet al. (1990a) reported that the best fertility indices,which included GnRH-stimulated LH, were thoseassessed at 11, 8, 6 and 2 months prior to mating andwere collectively significantly correlated with pregnancy
rate (P < 0.01). However, Perry et al. (1990a) alsoreported that these tests carried out on the bullsimmediately prior to and immediately post-mating didnot result in strong correlations with pregnancy rates. Inaddition, in two separate studies using four Hereford-Shorthorn bulls and three Zebu British cross-bredbulls (bulls aged 1729 months were individually joinedwith groups of 1930 cows), respectively, Post et al.(1987) reported that the bulls with the highest peakplasma testosterone concentrations 22.5 h after intra-muscular injection with GnRH achieved the highestoverall fertility [capable cows pregnant; highest libido(oestrous cows mated) and fertilizing ability (mounted
cows pregnant)]. Further, the rankings of the Bos indicusbulls for both reproductive performance and testoster-one response to GnRH were repeatable when measuredat two and four years of age (Post et al. 1987).Therefore, these studies suggest that it would be usefulto conduct a study of GnRH-stimulated release of LH inpre-pubertal bulls at around 23 months of age and thenevaluate these animals through puberty up to 2 years ofage. The GnRH-stimulated LH relationship with testesfunction, in terms of age at puberty and age at which anormal spermiogram is recorded, could be investigatedgiven the experimental design of the CRC Maleindicator traits to improve female reproductive perfor-mance Project. However, it is acknowledged that
conducting the GnRH response test is reasonably labourintensive.
Male and Female Reproductive Traits 535
The State of Queensland (through the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation) 2011
-
8/11/2019 Burns Et Al. 2011. Male Reproductive Traits and Their Relationship to Reproductive Traits in Their
3/20
Table1.Malereproductivetraitsandtheirrelation
shipwithothermeasuresofreproductivefunctioninthemale(a)Pre-pubertaltraits;(b)post-pubertaltraits(>2yearsold)
MaleTra
it
Reference
SpeciesBreed
Age
SampleType
MaleCorrelatedTraits
rg
rp
Comments
(a)Pre-p
ubertaltraits
CorrectedSC
(SCA
ge)
Brinksetal.(1978)
Cattle;H,A
12mo
l
Motility%
%
primaryabnormality
%
secondaryabnormality
%
normal
0.25
)0.51
)0.42
0.58
Sc
rotalcircumference
fa
vourablycorrelated
w
ithallsementraits
evaluated.
n=
287
Mackinnonetal.(1990
b)
Cattle;Dr
9mo
12mo
18mo
l
DifferenceinSCbetweenhigh-
and
low-fertilitylines(EBVforP
R)
HighLow5.8mm
HighLow9.6mm
HighLow16.0mm
n=
111
Follicle-s
timulating
hormon
e(basalFSH)
MouraandErickson(19
97)
Cattle;A
212mo
23mo
812mo
912mo
sm
YearlingSC
Sertolicellnumber
RS
)0.53to)0.74
)0.51to)0.54
)0.47to)0.53
)0.56to)0.64
n=
24
RS(roundspermatids
perSertolicell)
Aravindakshanetal.(20
00)
Cattle;HC
110mo
sm
Agepuberty
ns
n=
20
Basedon2smallgroups
selectedforagepuberty
Luteinizinghormone
(meanL
H)
MouraandErickson(19
97)
Cattle;A
212mo
sm
YearlingSC
ns
n=
24
Aravindakshanetal.(20
00)
Cattle;HC
1mo
2.5mo
9mo
sm
Agepuberty
)0.56
)0.51
)0.76
n=
20
Basedon2smallgroups
selectedforagepuberty
Luteinizinghormone
(pulsefrequencyLH)
Aravindakshanetal.(20
00)
Cattle;HC
2.5mo
5mo
sm
Agepuberty
)0.67
)0.51
n=
20
Basedon2smallgroups
selectedforagepuberty
Testoster
one
MouraandErickson(19
97)
Cattle;A
212mo
sm
YearlingSC
ns
n=
24
Aravindakshanetal.(20
00)
Cattle;HC
110mo
sm
Agepuberty
ns
n=
20
Basedon2smallgroups
selectedforagepuberty
Gonadotrophin-releasing
hormon
estimulatedFSH
(GnRH-stimulatedFSH)
MouraandErickson(19
97)
Cattle;A
212mo
sm
YearlingSC
nsto)0.71
n=
24
Cou
ldbeusefulatsome
age
s,butdatanotgiven
Aravindakshanetal.(20
00)
Cattle;HC
110mo
sm
Agepuberty
ns
n=
20
Basedon2smallgroups
selectedforagepuberty
GnRH-stimulated
testosterone
MouraandErickson(19
97)
Cattle;A
3mo
212mo
sm
YearlingSC
Testosterone
0.48
0.48to0.56
n=
24
GnRH-stimulatedLH
Haleyetal.(1989)
Sheep
2.55mo
sm
Selectionlines
GnRH-stimFSH
SCatsameage
0.400.14
Perryetal.(1990a)
Cattle
16mo
18mo
20mo
24mo
26mo
sm
PR
0.710.760.730.660.45
Severalbreeds,goodif
holdsuppre-puberty.
Inconvenient
me
asurementprocedure
MouraandErickson
(1997)
Cattle;A
212mo
sm
BasalLH
BasalFSH
GnRHstimFSHa
GnRHstimFSHb
0.650.480.690.75
aandbDifferenttimes
afterstimulation
536 BM Burns, C Gazzola, RG Holroyd, J Crisp and MR McGowan
The State of Queensland (through the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation) 2011
-
8/11/2019 Burns Et Al. 2011. Male Reproductive Traits and Their Relationship to Reproductive Traits in Their
4/20
Table1.(Continued)
MaleTra
it
Reference
S
peciesBreed
Age
SampleType
MaleCorrelatedTraits
rg
rp
Comments
Aravindakshanetal.
(2000)
Cattle;HC
110mo
sm
Agepuberty
ns
n=
20
Bas
edon2smallgroups
selectedforage
puberty.
Somestatisticsof
concernwith
sub-groups
Baguetal.(2006)
Cattle,HC
15mo
sm
Predictearlypuberty
(significantp