burn-out teologia lima 23 mayo 2011
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
1/30
Burn-out in the catholicclergy : the example of
India . LeuvenLima, Facultad de Teologia Pontificia y Civil de Lima, 23 de Mayo 2011
Prof. Dr. J. Corveleyn, Dr. EugeneJoseph Newman, sacerdote y Prof.Dr. H. De Witte and Prof. Dr. P. Luyten
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
2/30
The concepts
BURN-OUT IN GENERAL IN THE CLERGY
AND
ENGAGEMENT IN GENERAL IN THE CLERGY
2
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
3/30
3
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
4/30
(
Freudenberger
&
Richelson
, 1980;
Maslach
& Jackson, 1986;
Maslach
, 1993).
4
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
5/30
5
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
6/30
(
Schaufeli
et al., 2002) 6
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
7/30
7
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
8/30
The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI,Maslach , 1986)
Utrecht Work Engagement Scale : (UWES,Schaufeli et al., 2002a)
BURNOUT
EE .91
PA .84
DP .81
ENGAGEMENT
V .87
D .92
A .88
GOOD NEWS - 40.05% BAD NEWS16.04%8
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
9/30
CLERGY BURNOUT/ENGAGEMENT
9
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
10/30
(Demerouti et al ., 2001 a) 10
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
11/30
COGNITIVEDEMANDS
ROLECLARITY
WORKOVERLOAD
ROLE
CONFLICT
EMOTIONAL DEMANDS
OTHERS
EXPTIONS
AUTONOMY
SKILLUTILIZATION
SUPPORT-PEOPLE
SUPPORT-PRIESTS
SUPPORT-AUTHORITY
++++++
--- --+++++
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ, Kristensen et al., 2005).
ENGA
GEMENT
BURNOUT
11
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
12/30
12
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
13/30
AGREEABLENESS
EXTRAVERSION
NEUROTICISM
OPENESS TOEXPERIENCE
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
IDEAL WAY OFLIFE
ANTHROPOCENTRIC EGOISM
ANTHROPOCENTRIC ALTRUISM
THEOLOGICALEGOISM
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
--
+
+
+
+
+
+
BURNOUT
ENGAGE
MENT
The NEO Five -Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa &
McCrae, 1992)
The Unrealistic Expectations Questionnaire (Zondag ,
2000) 13
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
14/30
14
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
15/30
Religious attitude: Post-Critical Belief Scale
Literal Affirmation
Literal believer
Symbolic Affirmation
Symbolical believer
Literal unbelieverLiteralDisaffirmation
Symbolic unbelieverSymbolic
Disaffirmation
Inclusion of transcendence
Exclusion of transcendence
Literal Symbolical
15
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
16/30
LITERALEXCLUSION
SYMBOLICINCLUSION
LITERALINCLUSION
SYMBOLICEXCLUSION
PRIESTLY IDENTITY
HOURSSPENT
COMMITMENTTO CELIBACY
+
-
-
-
-+
-
--
+
+
+
+
+
BURNOUT
ENGAGE
MENT
The Post -critical Belief Scale , Hutsebaut,1996
Specifically made questionnaires, EugenJoseph Newman, 2010 16
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
17/30
An outcome is a consequence: a phenomenon that followswhich is caused by some previous phenomena
Burnout is associated with more than a hundred negativeoutcomes (Gill, 1980; Schaufeli & Enzmann , 1998).On the other hand, engagement has been linked to positivework -related outcomes (Bakker et al., 2005; Salanova , Agut ,& Peir , 2005).
17
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
18/30
COGNITIVE
STRESS
PHYSICALHEALTH
MINISTERIALCOMMITMENT
MENTALHEALTH
BEHAVIORALSTRESS
MINISTERIALSATISFACTION
B U R N O U T
E N G A G E ME NT
-
--
- +-
+
+
+
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ, Kristensen et al., 2005).
-
++
18
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
19/30
(http://www.cbcisite.com/)
14
15
1
Population of India: 1.147.995.898
Dioceses in India: 160There are 3 RitesDiocesan priests 14,000Religious priests 13,500
Catholics in India: 17.3 million (less than 2%)
19
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
20/30
AGE
27 AND 88YEARSM = 43.2YEARS
SD = 11.8
MINISTERIALEXPERIENCE
1 TO 58 YEARS
M =14.9 YEARS SD =11.9
NATURE OFMINISTRY 74.4%( N = 380)PARISH
25.6% ( N = 112)INSTITUTIONS
EDUCATION
BACHELORS43.2% ( N = 221)
MASTERS 44.4%( N = 227)
PHD 11.5% ( N = 59)
PLACE OFMINISTRY
33.5% ( N = 171)RURAL
49.7% ( N = 254)TOWN
16.8% ( N = 86)METROPOLITAN
CITIES
COMPANIONS ALONE 28.2% ( N = 144);
1 - 26.4% ( N = 135)
2 - 16.8% ( N = 86);
3 - 8 .4 % ( N = 43 )
4 & more 20.2% ( N = 103)
20
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
21/30
ANALYSISOF THEDATA
SPSS 16.0
DESCRIPTIVESTATISTICS
PRINCIPALCOMPONENTANALYSIS
CRONBACHALPHA
COEFFICIENTS
PEARSONCORRELATIONCOEFFICIENTS
HIERARCHICALREGRESSIONANALYSIS
21
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
22/30
B U R N O U T
PLACE OFMINISTRY
MINISTERIALEXPERIENCE
AGE
COMPANIONS
NATURE OFMINISTRY
EDUCATION
E N G A G E ME N
T
22
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
23/30
COGNITIVEDEMANDS
= .76
ROLECLARITY
= .84
WORK OVERLOAD
= .70
ROLE
CONFLICT = .73
EMONAL DEMANDS
= .79
OTHERS
EXPTIONS = .71
AUTONOMY = .76
SKILLUTILIZATION
= .78
SUPPORT-PEOPLE = .81
SUPPORT-PRIESTS
= .88
SUPPORT- AUTHORITY
= .95
+
+
+
-- -+++
Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ, Kristensen et al., 2005).
ENGA
GEMENT
BURNOUT
23
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
24/30
AGREE ABLENESS
= .75
EXTRAVERSION
= .72
NEUROTICISM = .72
OPENESS TOEXPERIENCE
= .46
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
= .81
IDEAL WAY OFLIFE
= .92
ANTHROPOCENTRIC EGOISM
= .83
ANTHROPOCENTRIC ALTRUISM
= .87
THEOLOGICALEGOISM = .87
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
BURNOUT
ENGAGE
MENT
The NEO Five -Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI; Costa &McCrae, 1992) The Unrealistic Expectations Questionnaire (Zondag ,2000) 24
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
25/30
LITERAL
EXCLUSION = .77
SYMBOLICINCLUSION
= .56
LITERALINCLUSION
= .56
SYMBOLICEXCLUSION
= .63
PRIESTLY IMAGE = .85
HOURSSPENT = .79
CELIBACY = .85
-
-
-
-+
++
+
Post Critical Belief Scale (Hutsebaut , 1996 ; 1997 ) Questionnaires on Priestly Image, Hours Spent andCelibacy (Joseph, Corveleyn , De Witte & Luyten ,
2006 )
BURNOUT
ENGAGE
MENT
25
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
26/30
COGNITIVESTRESS = .89
PHYSICALHEALTH = .78
MINISTERIALCOMMITMENT = .83
MENTALHEALTH = .81
BEHAVIORALSTRESS = .83
MINISTERIALSATISFACTION
= .92
B U R N O U T
E N G A G E ME NT
_ _
+
++ _
_
+
_
PHYSICALHEALTH = .78
MENTALHEALTH = .81
COGNITIVESTRESS = .89
BEHAVIORALSTRESS = .83
MINISTERIALCOMMITMENT
= .83
MINISTERIALSATISFACTION
= .92 26
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
27/30
EMONAL DEMANDS
COGNITIVE DEMANDS
NEUROTICISM
EXTRAVERSION
AGREEABLENESS
SUPPORT - PEOPLE
SKILL UTILIZATION
SUPPORT-PEOPL SUPPORT-PRIESTS
ANTHRO EGOISM
CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
ANTHRO ALTRUISM
CELIBACY
E N G A G E M E N T
B UR N O UT
27
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
28/30
Conclusions - recommendations
Importance of psychological factors in the training of future priests:burn-out exists!Invest in processes/procedures of psychological maturity:
Group dynamicsExperience outside the seminary
Discussion groups about: friendship, love, celibacy, personal growthDo not only invest in seminarians and young priest, but investduring the whole career. The need for continuousaccompagnement (age! Is not protecting); the diocesan priest is toomuch left alone, once ordained and put in the job. Despite the
attempt at identifying with Christ, the priest IS not Christ, he is notsuperman!
28
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
29/30
29
-
7/31/2019 Burn-Out Teologia Lima 23 Mayo 2011
30/30
References
Eugene Newman Joseph , The psychological phenomena of burnout and engagement in the Indian catholic diocesan clergy: An integrative approach. Promoters: Hans De Witte and Jozef Corveleyn; co-promoter:Patrick Luyten. (Doctoral dissertation; website:
Joseph, E.N., Corveleyn , J., Luyten, P., & De Witte, H. (2010). DoesCommitment to Celibacy lead to Burnout or Enhance Engagement? Astudy among the Indian Catholic Clergy. European Journal of Mental Health, 5, 187-204.
Joseph, E.N., Corveleyn , J., Luyten, P., & De Witte, H. (2010). Is PriestlyMinistry associated with Burnout or Engagement? A Study on the
Associations between Ministerial Demands, Ministerial Resources,Burnout and Engagement among the Indian Clergy. Asian Journal of Religious Formation . Accepted for Publication.
30