building the evidence for rotavirus immunization duncan steele .pdf · building the evidence for...
TRANSCRIPT
Roger Glass Lecture
Building the Evidence for Rotavirus
Immunization
11th International Rotavirus Symposium
Delhi, India. 3-5 September, 2014
Duncan Steele
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Building the EvidenceFor Rotavirus Immunization
2
1. The evidence of disease burden
2. The development of rotavirus vaccines
3. The public health impact of rotavirus vaccines
Building the Evidence 1 –
The Burden of Disease
3
Diarrhoeal diseases remain a major cause of Under5 child deaths
WHO CHERG 2012. Estimates for 193 countries for 2010.
Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S et al. Lancet 2012; 379: 2151-61
4
Electron microscopy identifies the major role of viruses in infantile gastroenteritis
Al Kapikian describes Norwalk virus in
stools - 1972
Ruth Bishop describes
rotavirus in duodenal biopsies
of young children -1973
5Kapikian AZ, Wyatt RG, Dolin R et al. J Virol 1972; 10: 1075-81
Bishop RF, Davidson GP, Holmes IH, Ruck BJ. Lancet 1973; ii: 1281-83
Rotavirus antigen detection – the key to evidence generation and the burden of disease
Rotavirus antigen ELISA developed in 1977
WHO Collaborating Centre, East Birmingham Hospital, UK
ELISA kits were constructed in the lab and mailed to
developing countries
Yolken RH, Wyatt RG, Kapikian AZ. Lancet 1977; ii: 819
Thomas Flewett
6
Rotavirus was rapidly identified as the most common cause of severe diarrhoea in young children
Ubiquitous virus infection globally
All children infected by the age of 2-3 years
First infections are generally symptomatic
and re-infections are common
Peak incidence of clinical disease among
children 6 –m 18 months
Natural immunity of ~75% is observed
Limited strains in circulation
Improvements in water and sanitation will
not prevent infection
7Parashar U et al. Emerg Infect Dis 1998 4(4) 561–570; Bresee JS, et al. Vaccine 1999; 17: 2207-22
Linhares AH & Bresee JS. Pan Amer J Public Health 2000 8(5) 305–330
WHO study to define aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in young children <36 months of age in 5 countries
Pathogen Cases Controls Pathogenicity
(n=3640) (n=3279) index
Rotavirus 16% 2% 8.0
ETEC 16% 5% 3.2
Shigella 11% 1% 11.0
C jejuni 11% 7% 1.6
EPEC 9% 6% 1.5
Enteric Ad 4% 2% 2.0
China, India, Mexico, Myanmar, Pakistan
Huilan S, Zhen LG, Mathan MM et al, Bull WHO 1991; 69: 549-558
Villous atrophy = malabsorptive diarrhoea
Saif L, Ward LA, Yuan L et al. Arch Virol 1996; 12:153-61
Histopathology of piglet intestine infected with rotavirus shows extensive damage to gut
Normal piglet villi Rotavirus infected
showing denuded
micro-villi
9
Creating the Tools for Evidence Generation
10
WHO-coordinated Global Rotavirus Surveillance Networks
11
Global Rotavirus Surveillance in 42 Member States 2012-2013
12
Rotavirus is identified as the most common cause of diarrhoeal death in young children
Tate JE, Burton AH, Boscho-Pinto C et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12: 136-41
10 countries account for ~85% of rotavirus associated
mortality
Global rotavirus surveillance:
36-40% of diarrhoeal
hospitalizations
13
36%
1st Asian Rotavirus Surveillance
Bangkok 1999
Vietnamese Rotavirus Group
Hanoi 2002
Where in the world is Roger?
Eastern Mediterranean Rotavirus Surveillance
Cairo 2005
15
African Rotavirus Surveillance
Accra 2002
Where in the world is Roger -2 ?
Understanding the Rotavirus structure and genome
VP2
VP4Neutralization
antigen
VP6Subgroupantigen
VP7Neutralization
antigen
Subcore
RNA
SegmentProtein
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
VP1
VP2
VP3
VP4
NSP1
VP6
NSP2
NSP3VP7
NSP4
NSP5
Modified from B.V. Venkataram Prasad, J Infect Dis 1996; 174: S37–S46 16
Rotavirus G and P genotypes determined by nested multiplex RT-PCR assays
Gouvea VP7 amplicons to identify
G-genotypes
Gentsch VP4 amplicons to identify
P-genotypes
500bp
Gouvea V, Glass R, Woods P et al. J Infect Dis 1990; 28: 276-82
Gentsch JR, Glass R, Woods P et al. J Infect Dis 1992; 30: 1365-72
18
P[8]G1
48%
P[4]G2
15%
P[8]G3
3%
P[8]G4
11%
P[6]G4
3%
other
7%
P[8]G9
7%
P[9]G6
6%
P[8]G3
other
P[8]G4
P[6]G9 P[6]G3
Rotavirus strains vary across the globe in the same time period
Brazil, 1982-94, N=130
Leite et al, 1996
Malawi, 1997-98,
N=100 Cunliffe et al,
1999
P[6]G8
42%
P[4]G8
9%
P[8]G5
10%
Hungary, 1995-99, N=284
Banyai et al, 2004
P[8]G1
P[4]G2
P[8]G3
P[8]G4
mixed
P[9]G3
P[6]G2
Gentsch JR, Laird AR, Bielfelt B et al. J Infect Dis 2005; 192: S146-5919
1995-1999
34%
25%
9%
17%
8%
0%
7%
2005-2009
29%
34%
2%
3%
13%
8%
11%
> = 1994
28%
26%14%
13%
7%
0%
12%
G1
G2
G3
G4
G9
G12
G Mixed
2000-2004
38%
20%1%
6%
9%
10%
16%
Rotavirus strain diversity over time in South East Asia (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh)
Miles MM, Lewis KDC, Steele AD. Vaccine 2012; 202: A131-39
20
Rotavirus in Africa Rotavirus in Asia
Rotavirus Vaccines
Evidence of the burden and
the impact of vaccines is
clearly demonstrated
Rotavirus is associated with moderate-to-severe diarrhoea in young Indian children
Annu
al M
SD C
ases
Per
100
Ch
ild Y
ears
Incidence of Moderate-to-Severe Diarrhea in Kolkata by Age and Cause
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-11 mo.
12-23 mo.
24-59 mo.
Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC et al. Lancet 2013; 382: 209-2222
24
Roger in Accra, Ghana
Roger in Geneva, Switzerland
25
Building the Evidence 2 –
Rotavirus Vaccine Development
26
Albert Z. Kapikian1930 - 2014
Father of viral gastroenteritis
“His seminal basic and clinical research contributions to the study of viruses and to vaccine development have had an enormous global impact”
Anthony Fauci, Director, NIAID
Natural infection with rotavirus offers protection against the disease
Bishop RF, Barnes GL, Cipriani E, Lund JS. Clinical immunity after neonatal
rotavirus infection. A prospective longitudinal study in young children. N
England J Med 1983; 309:72-76
Bhan MK, Lew JF, Sazawal S, et al. Protection conferred by neonatal
rotavirus infection against subsequent rotavirus diarrhea. J Infect Dis
1993; 168:282-287
Ward RL, Clemens JD, Knowlton DR, et al. Evidence that protection against
rotavirus diarrhea after natural infection is not dependent on
serotype-specific neutralizing antibody. J Infect Dis 1992; 166:1251-1257
Velaquez FR, Matson DO, Calva JJ, et al. Rotavirus infections in infant as
protection against subsequent re-infections. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1022-
1028
27
Lessons learnt from early clinical development with animal rotavirus strains
First clinical trial was conducted by Timo Vesikari with a bovine strain
(RIT4237) in 1983 in Finland
Series of clinical trials between 1984 and 1990 provided the basis of
our current vaccine strategies
– Discordant efficacy in various developing countries led to the “modified”
Jennerian approach pioneered by Al Kapikian at NIH
– Higher viral concentration had similar reactogenicity, but better immunogenicity
– Two doses gave better immune response than one
– Neutralizing antibody response was mostly homotypic
– Secondary immunization – even to the same serotype – gave a broadening of
the immune response
– >50% developed serum antibody responses
– Pre-existing ab levels correlated negatively with vaccine take
Vesikari T, Isolauri E, Delem A et al. Lancet 1983; ii: 807-11
Midthun K & Kapikian AZ, Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9:423-42
28
29
“Modified” Jennerian approach for Rhesus rotavirus reassortant vaccine
Animal strains are naturally
attenuated for humans
Belief that homotypic protection
was essential
Designed to include the VP7
gene coding the outer capsid
antigens of human rotaviruses
Rhesus strain was developed
and licensed as RotaShield
Midthun K, Greenberg HB, Hoshino Y & Kapikian AZ. J Virol 1985; 53: 949-54
Midthun K & Kapikian AZ. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996; 9:423-42
30
Lessons learnt from the Rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant vaccine trials
100% 97%
75%
100%
70% 73% 71%†
100%
69%
Dehydration Hospital admittance MD visits
US multi-centre
Finland
Venezuela
Rennels et al Pediatrics 1996;97:7-13. Santosham et al J Pediatr 1997;131:632-638.
Joensuu et al Lancet 1997;350:1205-1209. Pérez-Schael et al N Engl J Med 1997;337:1181-87
Tetravalent Rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant rotavirus vaccines & Intussusception
MMWR 1999; Patel M et al. Exp Rev Vaccines 2009; 8(11): 1555-64
RotaShield® licensed in USA in 1998 and immediately introduced into immunization programme
Associated with increased risk of intussusception– Relative risk of >30 in first week after dose 1
– Attributable risk: 1 in 10,000 vaccinees
ACIP recommendation for use was withdrawn and Wyeth withdrew vaccine from USA in 1999
31
Rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant vaccine clinical development continues…
RotaShield® clinical trials in
Africa/Asia in 1999
– Navrongo, Ghana
– Matlab, Bangladesh
– Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa
All trials were halted due to
intussusception in the USA
RRV-TV trial conducted in
Ghana in 2012, using a
neonatal dose schedule
Armah GE, Kapikian AZ, Vesikari T et al. J Infect Dis 2013; 208: 423-31 32
G1 G3
G2 G4
P[8]
Reassortant bovine-humanrotavirus strains
G1P[8]
Attenuated single human rotavirus strain
Rotarix™, GSK BioRotaTeq™, Merck
G6
P[5]
Ruiz-Palacios G, Perez-Schael I, Velazquez FR et al N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1-11
Vesikari T, Matson DO, Dennehy p, et al, N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 12-23
33
Early clinical trial results led to two paradigms for Rotavirus Vaccines
SAGE recommends rotavirus vaccination of infants into all national immunization programmes
WHO. Weekly Epidemiological Record 2009; 84: 213-36
WHO strongly recommends the inclusion of rotavirus vaccines
into national immunization systems in all regions of the world
Countries where diarrhoeal deaths among children from
diarrhoeal disease account for >10% of Under-5 mortality
should prioritize rotavirus vaccine introduction
34
“Modified” Jennerian Approach – Construction of NIH bovine–human reassortant rotavirus vaccine
VP4
VP7
Midthun K et al. J Virol 1985; 53: 949-54; Midthun K et al. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24: 822-26
Kapikian AZ et al. J Infect Dis. 2005; 192: 22-29
35
37
Serum Institute, Pune, India
Shantha Biotechnics, Hyderabad, India
Wuhan Institute, Wuhan, China
Butantan Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Sources: http://www.gavialliance.org/resources/DOC__11e_AVI_Progress_Report.pdf
10th International Rotavirus Symposium, Bangkok, September 2012
Manufacturer Country Product Phase
Biofarma Indonesia Human monovalent Phase 2b
Butantan Institute Brazil Bovine reassortant Phase 1
Serum Institute of India India Bovine reassortant Phase 3
Shantha Biotechnics India Bovine reassortant Phase 2
Wuhan Inst of
Biological Products
China Bovine reassortant Preclinical
Medica International
Foundation
Germany Rhesus reassortant Phase 2b
Live attenuated, orally administered Rotavirus Vaccine Pipeline
38
Nationally Licensed Rotavirus Vaccines
Manufacturer,
Country
Product Specifications Date Licensed
Lanzhou Institute of
Biological Products
China
Lanzhou Lamb
Rotavirus (LLR)
Vaccine
Lamb monovalent
G10P[12]
2000 in China
Center for Research
and Production of
Vaccines (POLYVAC)
Vietnam
Rotavin-M1™ Live attenuated
human G1P[8]
2007 in Vietnam
Bharat Biotech
International Limited
India
ROTAVAC™ Monovalent, human-
bovine G9P[1]1
2014 in India
39
The US-Indo Vaccine Action Programa successful vaccine development partnership
40
Visiting Bharat Biotech facility,
Hyderabad
Clinical Trial team, Delhi
Non-replicating Rotavirus Vaccine Candidates:Lead candidate is P2-VP8* particle (NIH)
Considered to address the issue of
improved efficacy and safety
Developed by Taka Hoshino
and Al Kapikian, NIAID
Phase 1 safety study complete
– Safe and well tolerated
– Robust immune responses
Phase 2 immunogenicity and
age descending study ongoing
in South Africa
**
ΔVP8*
Fusion
domain
Hsc70
binding
site
41Wen X, Cao D, Jones RW, et al. Vaccine 2012; 30: 6121-26
Stan Cryz et al. 11th International Rotavirus Symposium, Delhi 2014
42
Cathy and Al Kapikian
with grandson
Building the Evidence 3 –
Public Health Impact of Rotavirus Vaccines
43
Ciro de Quadros
1940 - 2014
Public Health Hero of the Americas
May, 2014
Polio eradication in Brazil and in Latin America
“No single person has done more to extend the benefits of immunization to people throughout the Americas”
Carissa Etienne, Director, PAHO
44
Mexico declaration:6th International Rotavirus Symposium, Mexico City, 2004
Delivered by Dr Rosario Quiroga,
Vice Minister of Health, Bolivia
On behalf of 16 Latin America
countries
Calling on PAHO Revolving Fund,
GAVI and vaccine manufacturers
to facilitate introduction
Recognize the need for rotavirus
vaccines as a public good
45
Successful Introduction of Rotavirus Vaccines in the Americas – USA and Nicaragua in 2006
Rotavirus vaccine
introduced into
Nicaragua – 2006 and
many countries of
Latin America
Panama
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Week of year
Perc
en
t o
f Tests
Ro
tavir
us P
osit
ive
Max
Median
Min
2007-8 Season
USA – impact seen between 2006 & 2008
MMWR 2008; 57:697-700; Patel et al, JAMA 2009; 301: 2245-51 46
Not GAVI-eligible [37]
GAVI-eligible [32]
Middle East
Bahrain
Iraq
Israel
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Uzbekistan
Yemen
Western Pacific
Australia
Fiji
Marshall Islands
Micronesia
New Zealand
Palau
Europe
Armenia
Austria
Belgium
Estonia
Finland
Georgia
Germany
Luxembourg
Moldova
United Kingdom
*National introductions by geographic region as of 15 August 2014
Africa
Angola Madagascar
Botswana Malawi
Burkina Faso Mali
Burundi Morocco
Cameroon Niger
Congo, Rep. Rwanda
Djibouti Sierra Leone
Eritrea South Africa
Ethiopia Sudan
The Gambia Tanzania
Ghana Togo
Kenya Zambia
Libya Zimbabwe
National Rotavirus Vaccine Introductions by Geographic Region - 69 countries*
Americas
Bolivia
Brazil
Cayman Islands
Colombia
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
United States
Venezuela
Asia
Philippines
47
Public health impact: Reduction in rotavirus hospitalizations
Belgium50-77%
RotaTeq & Rotarix
US66-86%RotaTeq
Bolivia70%
RotarixAustria 74-79%RotaTeq & Rotarix
Australia87%
RotaTeq & Rotarix
Patel MM, Glass R, Desai R, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12(7): 561-570
Hospitalizations: documented reductions of 50% or more in
children 0-2 years old following rotavirus vaccination
Brazil
El Salvador
Mexico
Nicaragua
South Africa
48
Public health impact: Reduction in all-cause diarrhoea hospitalizations
Brazil17-48%Rotarix
El Salvador28-37%Rotarix
USA 29-52%RotaTeq Belgium
33% RotaTeq & Rotarix
Mexico40%
Rotarix
Hospitalizations: documented reductions of nearly 20% or more in
children 0-2 years old following rotavirus vaccination
Patel MM, Glass R, Desai R, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12(7): 561-570
Australia
Nicaragua
South Africa
50
Richardson V, Pichardo JH, Solares MQ et al. NEJM; 2010: 362: 358-360
Reduction in deaths due to diarrhoeal disease in Mexico after the introduction of rotavirus vaccine
41% reduction
51
Public health impact: Herd immunity/indirect benefits of vaccination
Belgium65-80%
USA74-85%
Austria 76-79%
El Salvador79-86%
Belgium20-64%
USA41-80%
Austria 35%
El Salvador41-81%
Hospitalizations: documented
reductions of more than 50% in
children eligible for vaccination
Hospitalizations: documented
reductions of more than 20% in
children NOT eligible for vaccination
Patel MM, Glass R, Desai R, et al. Lancet Infect Dis 2012; 12(7): 561-57052
How would this efficacy translate into impact on a population level?
Estimates of cumulative impact of rotavirus vaccines, 2010-2025
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
30 40 50 60 70 80 90Efficacy
Liv
es
sa
ve
d
60%
efficacy
1.7 million lives
saved
Atherly DE, Dreibelbis R, Parashar UD et al. J Infect Dis 2009; 200: S28-3853
The Challenges Ahead for the Full Public Health Impact of Rotavirus Vaccines
Biological Challenges of the virus
and the host
Technical Challenges of rotavirus
vaccine development
Programmatic Challenges of
delivering the vaccines where
they are needed most
Funding Challenges to pay for
the vaccines
Safety Challenges of rotavirus
vaccines
Courtesy: Jan Holmgren, Goteborg University 54
55
Mathu Santosham & Ciro de Quadros
Roger Glass & Mathu Santosham
© 2014 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation