building teachers capacity to create and enact tasks that engage students in challenging...

45
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’ Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 16, 2007

Upload: catherine-leonard

Post on 04-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity

Peg Smith

University of Pittsburgh

Teachers’ Development Group

Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional DevelopmentFebruary 16, 2007

Page 2: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Overview Solve and discuss a series of multiplication tasks

Consider the role of representation in developing students’ understanding of mathematics and increasing the cognitive demands of a task

Read and discuss the Case of Monique Butler

Discuss the factors that support or inhibit students engagement in high level thinking and reasoning

Discuss the knowledge needed for teaching that teachers might learn from these experiences

Page 3: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task1:Multiplying Binomials

Directions: Find the product of each expression in its simplest form:

1. 2x (x – 1) 2. (x + 1) (x + 2) 3. (x - 2) (3x + 3) 4. (x – 3) (x + 3)5. (2x + 2) (2x – 2)6. (x + 3) (x + 3)

Page 4: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Making Sense of Multiplication

Using any of the tools available at your table:

• Model 3 x 4

• Model 3 x n

Page 5: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Making Sense of Multiplication

Using any of the tools available at your table:

• Model 6 x 13

• Model 6(n + 3)

Page 6: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Making Sense of Multiplication

Using any of the tools available at your table:

• Model 26 x 12

• Model (2x + 6)(x + 2)

Page 7: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Multiplying Binomials:Task 2

1. (x + 3) (x + 3) 3. (x - 3) (x + 3)

2. 2x (x - 1) 4. (x - 2) (3x + 3)

Directions: Use algebra tiles to show the product of these binomials. Make a sketch of your model.

(Note that these four problems also appeared in Task 1.)

Page 8: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Comparing Task 1 & Task 2

How are Tasks 1 and 2 the same and how are they different?

Page 9: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Comparing Task 1 & Task 2

In what ways did we “make connections to meaning” in our work

on Task 2?

Page 10: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Ways of Representing Mathematical Ideas

Pictures

Written Symbols

Manipulative Models

Real-World Situations

Oral Language

Van De Walle, 2004, p. 30

Page 11: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Linking Multiple Representations

The learner who can, for a particular mathematical problem, move fluidly among different mathematical representations has access to a perspective on the mathematics in the problem that is greater than the perspective any one representation can provide.

Driscoll, 1999

Page 12: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Linking Multiple Representations

Research has shown that children who have difficultly translating a concept from one representation to another are the same children who have difficulty solving problems and understanding computations. Strengthening the ability to move between and among these representations improves the growth of children’s concepts.

Lesh, Post, Behr, 1987

Page 13: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Linking to Research/Literature

If we want students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve then we need to start with high-level, cognitively complex tasks.

Stein and Lane, 1996

Page 14: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Consider…

What if the textbook teachers are using doesn’t have many high-level, cognitively complex tasks?

How can you do help teacher learn to modify tasks so that they will provide opportunities for students to develop the capacity to think, reason, and problem solve?

Page 15: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

General Techniques for Modifying Tasks

Ask students to create real world stories for “naked number” problems

Use an additional representation and make connections between two (or more) representations

Solve an “algebrafied” version of the task Use a task “out of sequence” before students have memorized a

rule or have practiced a procedure that can be routinely applied Eliminate components of the task that provide too much

scaffolding

Page 16: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

General Techniques for Modifying Tasks

Ask students to create real world stories for “naked number” problems

Use an additional representation and make connections between two (or more) representations

Solve an “algebrafied” version of the task Use a task “out of sequence” before students have memorized a

rule or have practiced a procedure that can be routinely applied Eliminate components of the task that provide too much

scaffolding

Page 17: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task A

Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T., & Stiff, L. (2001). CA Algebra 1: Concepts and Skills, McDougal Littell, 213.

Page 18: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task A AdaptationsFor the following equations:

1. Graph on a coordinate plane.

2. Identify 3 solutions for each equation.

3. Are your solutions unique? Explain your reasoning.

a. y= 3x - 5

b. 5x + 2y = 10

c. -5x -3y = 12

3x - 5y = 15

(i) Find 3 solutions to the equation

(ii) Plot the points and describe all the patterns you see. (Group extension: plot all points on group graph)

(iii) How many solutions do you believe exist for this function? Explain your reasoning.

Page 19: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task B

Smith, S., Charles, R., Dossey, J., & Bittinger, M. (2001). Algebra 1, California Edition, Prentice Hall, 321.

Page 20: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task B AdaptationsFind the slope of thelines containing thesepoints using a graph.

11. (4, 0) (5, 7)13. (0,8) (-3,10)17, (0,0) (-3,-9)

Can you write a rule that willalways work for finding theslope? (Or explain why therule you already know WORKS?)

Original Problem +

How can you use the slope tofind other points on the sameline?

Use a graph to explain why therule you used to find the slopeworks.

Page 21: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Final Reflections on Task Adaptation The one lesson I found particularly enlightening was the

modification of tasks. I used this myself in the PTR assignment, and see the benefits of doing so more in the future. The goal of maintaining the original intent of the problem, was an important consideration that I will remember.

…I learned more about how to create tasks with a certain goal in mind and how to improve my questioning…I also felt more inspired to design more tasks.

I learned how to adapt an activity to raise the cognitive demand to challenge my learning support students and still foster achievement. I feel it is possible to do more open-ended tasks even though they struggle with computation and procedures to build their mathematical knowledge.

Page 22: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Case of Monique Butler

Page 23: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Analyzing the Case of Monique Butler

Discuss with colleagues at your table:

• What did Monique Butler want her students to learn?

• What did Monique Butler’s students learn?

Cite evidence from the case (i.e., paragraphnumbers) to support your claims.

Page 24: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Analyzing the Case of

Monique Butler

What prevented Monique Butler’s students from learning what she wanted them to learn?

(Cite evidence from the case to support your claims.)

Page 25: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Analyzing the Case ofMonique Butler

In terms of the Mathematical Tasks Framework, what is Monique Butler a case of?

Page 26: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS

as implemented by students

Student Learning

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Page 27: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS as implemented by students

Student Learning

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Page 28: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS

as implemented by students

Student Learning

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Page 29: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS

as implemented by students

Student Learning

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Page 30: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Mathematical Tasks Framework

TASKS

as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials

TASKS

as set up by the teachers

TASKS as implemented by students

Student Learning

Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4

Page 31: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Factors Associated with the Maintenance and Decline of High-Level Cognitive Demands

Decline Maintenance Routinizing problematic aspects of the

task Shifting the emphasis from meaning,

concepts, or understanding to the correctness or completeness of the answer

Providing insufficient time to wrestle with the demanding aspects of the task or so much time that students drift into off-task behavior

Engaging in high-level cognitive activities is prevented due to classroom management problems

Selecting a task that is inappropriate for a given group of students

Failing to hold students accountable for high-level products or processes

Scaffolding of student thinking and reasoning

Providing a means by which students can monitor their own progress

Modeling of high-level performance by teacher or capable students

Pressing for justifications, explanations, and/or meaning through questioning, comments, and/or feedback

Selecting tasks that build on students’ prior knowledge

Drawing frequent conceptual connections

Providing sufficient time to explore

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Page 32: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Analyzing the Case of Monique Butler

How was your experience multiplying binomials (Task 2) similar or different from Monique Butler’s students’ experience multiplying binomials?

Page 33: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Analyzing the Case of Monique Butler

What lessons can we learn from the Case of Monique Butler?

Page 34: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

The Role of the Teacher

Worthwhile tasks alone are not sufficient for effective teaching. Teachers must also decide what aspects of a task to highlight, how to organize and orchestrate the work of the students, what questions to ask to challenge those with varied levels of expertise, and how to support students without taking over the process of thinking for them and thus eliminating the challenge.

NCTM, 2000, p. 19

Page 35: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Considering the Knowledge Needed for Teaching

What knowledge needed for teaching might teachers develop through experience such as those we discussed today?

How will know if teachers learned what you intended for them to learn?

Page 36: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching

CommonContentKnowledge

Knowledge at the mathematical horizon

SpecializedContentKnowledge

Knowledge ofContent andStudents

Knowledge of Content and Teaching

KnowledgeofCurriculum

Ball, Bass, Hill, and Thames, 2006

Page 37: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Page 38: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Using an area model to calculate 6 x 13:13

6

6 x 13 = 78

Making Sense of Multiplication

Page 39: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Using an area model to calculate 6 x 13:

10 3

6 10 x 6 3 x 6

6 x 13 = 6 x (10 + 3) = (6 x 10) + (6 x 3) = 60 + 18 = 78

Making Sense of Multiplication

Page 40: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

6 6 x n 6 x 3

6(n + 3) =

(6 x n) + (6 x 3) =

6n + 18

n 3

Making Sense of Multiplication

Using an area model for 6(n + 3):

Page 41: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Using an area model to calculate 26 x 12:

20 6

10

2

20 x 10 6 x 10

20 x 2 6 x 2

Making Sense of Multiplication

26 x 12 = (20 + 6) (10 + 2) =

(20 x 10) + (20 x 2) + (6 x 10) + (6 x 2) =

200 + 40 + 60 + 12 = 312

Page 42: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Using an area model for (2x + 6)(x + 2): 2x 6

x

2 4x

Making Sense of Multiplication

(2x + 6)(x + 2) =

(2x)(x) + (2x)(2) + (6)(x) + (6)(2) =

2x2 + 4x + 6x + 12 =

2x2 + 10x + 12

Page 43: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

“Algebrafying” a Task

Existing arithmetic activities and word problems are transformed from problems with a single numerical answer to opportunities for pattern building, conjecturing, generalizing, and justifying mathematical facts and relationships.

Blanton & Kaput, 2003, p.71

Page 44: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

“Algebrafying” the Sweater Sale Task

Original

The cost of a sweater at J. C. Penney's was $45.00. At the "Day and Night Sale" it was marked 30% off of the original price. What was the price of the sweater during the sale?

ModifiedThe cost of a sweater at J. C. Penney's was $45.00. At the "Day and Night Sale" it was marked 30% off of the original price. What was the price of the sweater during the sale? What would the sale price be if the original price was $46? $47? $48? $100? What is the relationship between the original price of the sweater and the sale price?

Page 45: Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’

Task C

Larson, R., Boswell, L., Kanold, T. D., & Stiff, L. (2001). CA Algebra 1: Concepts and Skills, McDougal Littell, 273.