building envelope commissioning - energy exchange · george bourassa, p.e., ccp, leed ap jacobs...
TRANSCRIPT
Tampa Convention Center • Tampa, Florida
Building Envelope Commissioning New & Existing Buildings
Commissioning for Performance
George Bourassa, P.E., CCP, LEED AP Jacobs
August 16, 2017
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 2
Presentation Highlights
Team experience • Building envelope commissioning
services for existing & new facilities
Commissioning of building envelopes
• Recent development driven by failures of new construction & deterioration of existing facades
Important consideration • Influence on energy consumption
driven by building envelope performance
Case study examples
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 3
Presentation Highlights
Commissioning industry has evolved • Whole Building Commissioning (WBCx)
Building Envelope • Important influence on energy
performance • Ability of infrastructure to maintain
interior environmental conditions • Multiple envelope failures in United
States have prompted high level scrutiny over design & construction of envelope configurations
• Building Envelope Commissioning (BECx) integrates with all systems to be commissioned to deliver performance of the entire facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 4
Introduction
Context: According to industry experts, building envelope related moisture & moisture vapor problems: Account for approximately 90% of construction litigation according to some industry experts
ASTM estimates water-related defects cost us more than $9 billion each year
Where is the source of these issues?
- Quality of design detailing? - Problems during fabrication or
manufacturing? - Improper construction in the
field? - Combination of the above?
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 5
Introduction
Deficiencies witnessed • Fabrication & manufacturing process (factory) • Assembly of products (factory/shop) • Interface between factory made product/assembly
and field-installed construction (field) • Interface between two different field-installed
products/assemblies (field)
Deficiencies occurred with surprising frequency • 100% of windows tested by a manufacturer failed
air & water infiltration testing • Due to a large number of test failures, 25% of all
windows on one project were eventually tested for air & water leakage
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 6
Introduction
Better understanding of when and where issues are developing: Include and specify the proper quality control procedures to mitigate risks
Obtain understanding of their causes, and prevent them from happening in the future. • Learning Objectives….
- Discuss the causes of many problems with the building envelope observed in the field
- Better understanding of the benefits of field testing - By expanding our knowledge of best practices
we can avoid these problems in the future - Recognize other available tools used for field testing
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 7
Building Envelope Impact On Energy Performance
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 8
Building Envelope Impact On Energy Performance
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 9
Zero Energy Target Projects
Building envelope performance key to achieving target
• Recent completion of Fort Carson Hangar design/construction
• Comprehensive planning by project team from concept to completion of construction
• Enhanced insulation value for roof R-50 and walls R-47; above code
• Air barrier 62% more stringent that required; 0.15 CFM/SF vs. 0.4 CFM/SF requirement
• Reduced air leakage/heat loss from hangar doors by double seals at perimeter
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• American Society for Testing & Materials (ASTM)
• National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS)
• American Society of Heating, Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
• Envelope Design Guideline for Federal Buildings Thermal Integrity & Air Tightness (NISTIR)
• ANSI/ASHRAE/USHBS/IES Standard 189.1-2011 Building Envelope Thermal, Moisture & Pressurization IGCC 2012 903.1
• American Architectural Manufacturers Association
• Differences in State codes
10
Building Envelope Performance Code References
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Elements to be replaced vs. what remains?
• Junctions between existing & new elements always critical - Importance of appropriate air & water
testing
• Existing materials/assemblies in window/wall systems to be tested? How does this impact performance criteria of chosen test method?
• Test criteria adjusted for existing assemblies?
• Recent experience of 70 year old masonry wall junction with new curtain wall
11
Challenges Presented By Existing Envelopes
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 12
Commissioning Activities
Project Timeline
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 13
Sample Responsibilities Matrix
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 14
Sample Responsibilities Matrix
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Important to establish specific test matrix
• Responsibility: Who & when? Who witnesses?
• Laboratory mock-up tests
- Our experience
• Lessons learned from failed mock-up testing
• Distributed responsibilities associated with envelope construction leads to inherent quality control issues
• Goal of holistic Cx
- Identify performance problems early & drive resolution
15
Testing Protocols
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 16
Sample Test Criteria
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 17
Infrared Thermography: Water Infiltration
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 18
Infra-Red Photographs Of Envelope Heat Loss
Heat Loss From Typical Hangar Door Assembly
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Transit station in a cool, humid climate
• Custom curtain wall system
• Insulated glazed panels captured on two sides
• Insulated glass panels approximately 1.6” thick
• Intermediate joint consists of silicone sealant and a gasket
• Concealed joinery
• More than 50 different materials and products
19
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Insulated glazed panels span between continuous extruded aluminum clips
• Each clip has two cutouts – 4 cutouts at each panel
• Each panel then sits upon four steel anchors fastened back to structural frame of the building
• Structural columns reduced to ½” steel plate to provide space for concealed joinery
20
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 21
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Typical Curtain Wall Bay • Two-part air & water barrier system
Inner: • Each insulated glass panel, silicone
sheet flashing membrane & frame stop assembled in shop
• Termination bar fastened in the field with liquid membrane & silicone sheet
Outer: • Outer seal: weatherproof silicone
sealant installed in field
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 22
Case Study: Assembly Facility
JAMB: Weatherproofing Barriers • Outer seal: 1-part weatherproof silicone sealant • Inner seal: .08” thick continuous silicone sheet
flashing membrane (embedded in silicone sealant at column)
• Seal at glazing: 2-part structural silicone • Exterior & interior steel jamb panels
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 23
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Silicone sheet membrane flashing embedded in weatherproof silicone with termination bar
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 24
Case Study: Assembly Facility
SILL: General • A drainable cavity allows for escape of
moisture & condensation • Sill cavity drains into gutters • Gutters collect water from….
- water that penetrates outer sealant - sill cavities
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 25
Case Study: Assembly Facility
SILL: Weatherproofing Barriers • Outer seal: 1 part weatherseal silicone • Inner seal: 1 part weatherseal silicone • Thin gauge stainless steel sill flashing • Fastened to steel curb
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 26
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 27
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 28
Test Methodology: Assembly Facility
TEST #1 AAMA 503 • Field Test of Newly Installed Storefronts, Curtain
Walls, & Sloped Glazing Systems - pressurized
Test Pressures • Air infiltration: test pressure = 6.24 psf
- allowable air leakage = .06 cfm/sf • Water infiltration: test pressure = 10 psf
- allowable water leakage = none
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 29
Test Methodology: Assembly Facility
TEST #2 AAMA 501.2 • Diagnostic Water Leakage Field Test
- non-pressurized
Test Pressures • Water infiltration:
Test pressure of water = 30-35 psf • Observing the joints during testing
required use of an inspection camera with a 5/8” camera head
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 30
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Sill Cavities • Confusion in the contract drawings:
- Weep holes were shown on only one of the details in the contract drawings, & not in several others
- This contradiction was missed during shop drawing review – proper drainage of cavities not shown
- This deficiency was identified during the course of field testing & corrected
- Without detection, water damage would have occurred.
Best practices… • Review of shop drawings is an important process – staff
appropriately - Include field testing of both a mock-up as well as
installed work for air & water infiltration
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 31
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Robust Detailing • The silicone sheet membrane flashing
provided a strong & flexible secondary barrier to the outer silicone sealant joint (no water infiltration observed at jamb conditions)
Best practice… • Use a two-part barrier strategy when flashing
curtain wall, storefront or windows to adjacent walls
• One of those barriers should be membrane flashing
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 32
Case Study: Assembly Facility
Construction Tolerances/Building Movement • Interface between insulated glass panels & exterior/
interior jamb panels (width of panels was constant) - As a result, there is frequent variability in the
installation of the outer sealant joint & inner gasket joint
- Interior jamb panels & gaskets did not touch glass surface
- Gaskets were crushed between glass & steel panel - Outer sealant had no backer rod & little surface for
purchase
Best practice… • Be sure to provide for movement between the
structural frame & the air, water & weather barriers
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Seventy-year-old facility; curtain wall vertical addition
• Laboratory mock-up tests of curtain wall failed; modifications to sealant installation resulted in tests pass
• Field installation required modifications to accommodate beam penetrations & uneven slab edges; curtain wall tests passed, but Cx discovered significant air & moisture migration at junction of existing & new
• If aggressive Cx had not highlighted test failures, building would have failed all internal environmental criteria performance
33
Case Study: Existing Masonry Structure
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve 34
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Forty-year-old high rise office building
• Glazed curtain wall with aluminum spandrel panels
• Extensive deterioration: Potential risk of materials falling on plaza below
• Extensive energy modeling & CFD analysis influenced final façade replacement decision
• Double wall assembly with sealed cavity
• Extensive commissioning of laboratory mock-up & field installation
35
Case Study: Existing Curtain Wall
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• New high rise judicial facility in northerly climate
• Comprehensive BECx program developed early in the design phase
• Multiple failures in laboratory mock-up tests despite conventional curtain wall design
• Modifications to installation resulted in pass result for mock-up tests
• On site installation progressed favorably & all BECx tests had pass result
36
Case Study: New High Rise Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• New healthcare facility in southern climate
• Failure of laboratory mock-up tests at joint between windows & metal or precast panels
• Sealant determined to be cause of failure
• On site installation produced similar failures
• Implementation of high intensity Quality Control program resulted in pass result for BECx testing
37
Case Study: New Healthcare Facility
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Verified performance of building envelope systems
• Measurement and verification of air leakage within specified tolerance
• No water infiltration into the building
• Control of air and water vapor from inside the building to outside
• Interior environmental metrics established and maintained in accordance with Owner Project Requirements
38
Building Envelope Commissioning Benefits
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
• Building envelope commissioning provides significant value
• Mock-up testing provides early identification of design or installation failures, resulting in resolution of problems before corrections are required on site
• Owner is ultimate benefactor because we do not sign off as approved any envelope elements or systems that have not passed all of the functional testing identified in early design phase
• Value driven proposition: Building Envelope services repeatedly result in savings to owners multiple times the cost of our professional fees
39
Building Envelope Commissioning Conclusions
Energy Exchange: Connect • Collaborate • Conserve
Thank You
Questions?
George Bourassa
40