building democracy in afghanistan
TRANSCRIPT
8/3/2019 Building Democracy in Afghanistan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/building-democracy-in-afghanistan 1/2
Building Democracy in Afghanistan
March 9, 2009
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/03/afghanistan_democracy.html
PRINT EMAIL TEXT-SIZE: A A A SHARE:
“Is it possible to see the emergence of a viable democratic state in Afghanistan,
or not?” Afghan Foreign Minister Dr. Rangin Dadfar Spanta asked at a Center for
American Progress event on February 26. At the event, Spanta focused on
whether democracy was possible in Afghanistan and what strategies could aid in
the democratization process.
Rudy deLeon, Senior Vice President of National Security and International Policy
at the Center, moderated the discussion. deLeon noted that the Obamaadministration is currently grappling with serious challenges in Afghanistan, as it
attempts to conduct a major review of American strategy, which is expected to
be released in conjunction with the upcoming 60th anniversary summit of the
NATO alliance in April. Spanta praised the administration for bringing his
government and its neighbor Pakistan into the discussion; forging a
comprehensive strategy for building a prosperous and democratic Afghanistan
“is a very serious matter,” he said, and “a matter of the future of my country.”
The massive constitutional, executive, and parliamentary changes that have
occurred in the country in the last seven years can serve as evidence of
democratic advancement, Spanta said. And the more than 500 newspapers, 20
private television channels, 80-90 radio stations, and numerous interest groups—
especially women’s—are all pushing Afghanistan toward democratization. These
media outlets continue to be key to engaging the public and overcoming the
hurdles of the past. “Democracy,” commented Dr. Spanta, “is not only desirable
for Afghan people; it is a necessity in order to overcome the fundamentalist
legacy.”
Spanta noted that international forces have been deployed for more than seven
years in Afghanistan, and he recognized the service and sacrifice American men
and women have made there. Despite these efforts, he acknowledged, the
Taliban-led insurgency remains a serious threat to the country, and he urged the
United States, its allies, and other regional partners not to abandon the efforts
for a "reductionist" approach.
Progress in Afghanistan, Spanta argued, will require a comprehensive strategythat emphasizes "security, sustainable development, and good governance."
8/3/2019 Building Democracy in Afghanistan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/building-democracy-in-afghanistan 2/2
With respect to sustainability, he emphasized that Afghanistan’s environment
was significantly affected by war and by climate change, and efforts would need
to be made to repair environmental problems such as fighting drought and
rebuilding worn infrastructure.
Acknowledging that corruption in Afghan institutions will need to be addressed,
Spanta reported that while “last year 621 mid-level and senior officials have
been prosecuted or fired, including administrators, governors, and an
ambassador, Afghanistan will continue to confront administrative corruption.”
He made clear that the major issue in the fight against corruption and terrorism
in the country is the cultivation and trafficking of drugs, despite a 19-percent
reduction in poppy production last year. Spanta pointed to the necessity of government strength in dealing with drug-related problems. “If you want to get
rid of poppy cultivation,” he stressed, “the capability of the Afghan government
must be strengthened across Afghanistan.”
A broader security approach among U.S., NATO, and Pakistani colleagues would
be needed, Spanta said, and Pakistan’s huge population and nuclear power make
it the greatest potential danger to peace in the region. He stressed that, “If
Pakistan became a failed state it would be serious not only for the U.S. and
Afghanistan but for the entire region.” Afghanistan is committed to a strongerrelationship with Pakistan based on trust and built on joint negotiations with the
new civilian government, and he encouraged the United States and its allies to
find commonality with Pakistan.
Spanta concluded by saying that, “as we have discussed on many occasions,
democratization [in Afghanistan] is vital today and in the future.” While
democracy is universally applicable and Afghan citizens are ready to accept
constitutional government and modern values, Spanta cautioned that “it
[democratization] is not a project that can be exported or given: It takes time to
develop and to flourish.”