building codes division - oregon · 2019-11-06 · building codes division 1535 edgewater street nw...
TRANSCRIPT
Building Codes Division 1535 Edgewater Street NW
P.O. Box 14470 Salem, OR 97309-0404
503-378-4133 Fax: 503-378-2322
oregon.gov/bcd
Kate Brown, Governor
Residential and Manufactured Structures Board
Regular meeting agenda
Wednesday, January 11, 2017, 9:30 a.m.
Conference Room A
Board meetings are broadcast live via the Internet at
http://www.oregon.gov/bcd
Click on “View live meetings”
I. Board business A. Call to order
B. Roll call
C. Approval of agenda and order of business
D. Approval of the October 5, 2016, board meeting draft minutes
E. Date of the next scheduled meeting: April 5, 2017
F. Welcome new member: Gordon Anslow, home designer
II. Public comment This time is available for individuals wanting to address the Board on non-agenda items only. The Board will not
take action on non-agenda items raised under public comment at this meeting. Testimony on agenda items will be
heard when the item is called. (See "Issues to remember when addressing the Board" at the end of this agenda).
III. Reports Residential structures program update
IV. Communications - None
V. Appeals - None
VI. Unfinished business - None
VII. New business A. Review proposed rules to clarify the difference between a recreational vehicle from a wood-
sided structure commonly called “tiny house” and “park trailer.” This agenda item will
impact manufacturers and local government
B. Review and discuss December 2, 2016, Earth Advantage report “Cost Analysis of Potential
Energy Code Improvements” as it relates to residential energy codes
VIII. Announcements - None
IX. Adjournment
Issues to remember when addressing the board:
All public participation is subject to the discretion of the board chair for order of testimony, length and
relevance.
Speakers are generally limited to five minutes.
Please register on the attendance registration form and on the public testimony registration form, listing
the appropriate agenda item.
The board chair will call you to the front testimony table.
Please state your name and the organization you represent (if any).
Always address your comments through the chair.
If written material is included, please provide 20 three-hole-punched copies of all information to the
boards administrator prior to the start of the meeting and, when possible, staff respectfully requests an
electronic copy of materials 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Interpreter services or auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon advance request. Persons
making presentations including the use of video, DVD, PowerPoint, or overhead projection equipment are asked to
contact boards coordinator 24 hours prior to the meeting. For assistance, please contact Debi Barnes-Woods at 503-
378-6787.
Please do not park vehicles with "E" plates in "customer only" spaces.
Note: For information regarding re-appointments or board vacancies, please visit the Governor’s website.
Page 1 of 4
Residential and Manufactured Structures Board
Board meeting minutes
October 5, 2016
Members present: Jan Lewis, Chair, residential structural contractor
Bruce Dobbs, Vice-chair, utility/energy supplier
John Chmelir, multi-family contractor
Tonya Halog, structural engineer
Douglas Lethin, remodeler residential structural contractor
Rebai Tamerhoulet, building official
Members absent: Gordon Anslow, home designer
Emily Kemper, public member
John Mills, residential building trade sub-contractor
Vacant, manufacturer of manufactured dwellings
Vacant, seller or distributor of new manufactured dwellings
Staff present: Brett Salmon, manager, Policy and Technical Services
Rex Turner, structural program chief, Policy and Technical
Services
Mark Heizer, P.E., energy and mechanical code specialist, Policy
and Technical Services
Alana Cox, senior policy advisor, Policy and Technical Services
Tony Rocco, building code specialist, Policy and Technical
Services
Lesli Brassfield, stakeholder & public affairs analyst,
Administration
Richard Baumann, policy analyst, Policy and Technical Services
Debi Barnes-Woods, boards administrator/coordinator, Policy and
Technical Services
Guests present: Blake Shelide, Oregon Department of Energy
Warren Cook, Oregon Department of Energy
Howard Asch, OHBA
Lewis Starr, NEEA
I. Board business
A. Call to order
Chair Jan Lewis called the Residential and Manufactured Structures Board
meeting to order at 9:33 a.m. The meeting was held at the Building Codes
Division in Conference Room A, 1535 Edgewater Street NW, Salem, Oregon.
State of Oregon
Draft
Agenda
Item
I.D
Page 2 of 4
(Because of technical issue with the streaming equipment, only written minutes of
the meeting are available for the permanent record.)
B. Roll call
New member Gordon Anslow, Emily Kemper, and John Mills were all absent
excused. All other members were present in Conference Room A.
This board has two vacancies: Manufacturer of manufactured dwellings and seller
or distributor of new manufactured dwellings.
C. Approval of agenda and order of business Chair Lewis RULED the agenda approved with the modification of moving Item
I.G. to the next meeting agenda.
D. Approval of the board meeting minutes of April 6, 2016.
Chair Lewis RULED the draft meeting minutes of April 6, 2016, final.
E. Date of the next regularly scheduled meeting The next meeting date scheduled is for January 11, 2017.
F. Farewell to member Kathryn Gray, home designer
A certificate from the Governor and a thank you letter from the division
administrator were mailed in Kathryn’s absence.
G. Welcome new member Gordon Anslow, home designer
This item has been moved to the next meeting agenda in Gordon’s absence.
II. Public comment - None
III. Reports Residential program update
Rex Turner, structural program chief, discussed daily activities with the program.
He said that the program is averaging 375 contacts per month from customers,
which includes emails and telephone calls. 60 percent of the calls were from the
private sector.
IV. Communications - None
V. Appeals - None
VI. Unfinished business - None
Page 3 of 4
VII. New business
2017 Oregon Residential Specialty Code adoption discussion
Richard Baumann, policy analyst, Policy and Technical Services, explained that
the 45-day period for accepting code amendment proposals was from August 1
through September 14, 2016. The 2018 ORSC is anticipated to become effective
October 1, 2017.
Mr. Baumann said that the division is looking for direction from the board to
select code change committee members and a chair, select a model code for the
committee to work from, and dates and process for code committee meetings.
Once the division receives direction from the board, the internal review of model
code begins.
Chair Lewis said that industry is currently using the 2014 ORSC and 2009 IRC
with Oregon Amendments as the base model code. Chair Lewis asked members to
make a recommendation on a base model code. She said that if the board follows
past practices, it would be to use the most current IRC. Her suggestion was for the
committee to use the 2015 IRC as a base with Oregon amendments.
Rebai Tamerhoulet said that the board and industry are familiar with the IRC. His
vote was to use the 2015 IRC as a base.
Vice-chair Bruce Dobbs and Tonya Halog also agreed that using the most current
code would be beneficial to the board and industry.
Motion by vice-chair Dobbs to use the 2015 IRC as a base model code and to
incorporate Oregon amendments.
Motion carried unanimously.
Chair Lewis said she has reached out to industry and stakeholders on behalf of the
board for an agreement on membership to the code committee and a committee
chair.
Chair Lewis asked for a motion from the board on the proposed vetted list for
membership to the 2017 Oregon Residential Specialty Code Committee:
Proposed code committee members:
Mike Goodrich, (chair) Legend Homes
Justin Wood, Fish Construction, Inc
Nathan Young, Nathan D. Young Construction, Inc
Tanya Halog, P.E., S.E., J.G. Pierson, Inc.
Matt Rozzell, CBO, City of Happy Valley
Blake Shelide, P.E., Oregon Department of Energy
Page 4 of 4
David Mills, Deputy State Fire Marshal, Office of Oregon State Fire Marshal
Motion by John Chmelir to approve the committee membership and chair as
listed above.
Motion carried unanimously.
VIII. Announcements - None
IX. Adjournment Chair Lewis adjourned the Residential and Manufactured Structures Board at
10:11 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by Debi Barnes-Woods/Boards Administrator/Coordinator
State of Oregon Board memo
Building Codes Division January 11, 2017
To: Residential and Manufactured Structures Board
From: Richard Baumann, policy analyst, Policy and Technical Services
Subject: Temporary wood-sided structures and recreational vehicles
Over the last several months, the division’s Enforcement Section has reviewed the activities of
certain manufacturers of wood-sided, residential-type structures. Many of the structures were
constructed using a chassis and wheels for transportation. Some of the structures were temporary
in nature and some were used for dwelling or housing purposes. The division’s Enforcement
Section reviewed three regulatory areas:
1. Licensing requirements, specifically electrical and plumbing;
2. Code standards the products were built to; and
3. Inspection and permitting protocols that were followed.
The division has closed its initial investigation and now proposes a clear regulatory path for
recreational vehicles (RV’s). Enclosed is a temporary rule the division plans to enact (after
receiving feedback from the Residential and Manufactured Structures Board and the public). The
rule clarifies the definition of RV’s and eliminates the park trailer code in Oregon. This will
eliminate the division’s regulatory approval for a temporary wood-sided structure, such as a park
trailer. Those structures will be able to built and offered for sale in Oregon without state approval
which will align Oregon with 47 other states. This proposal will still recognize existing
requirements for temporary structures and structures designed to be used as dwellings under the
Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
By clarifying the definition of RV, this rule will relieve confusion created by industry regarding
temporary versus permanent wood-sided residential type dwellings. Our investigation found that
some manufacturers were building to an RV or seasonal use code standard while others weren’t
building to any standard. Structures for use or occupancy must meet minimum safety standards –
whether they are on wheels or not. Builders of wood-sided structures (with or without wheels),
will have the choice to seek local approval as a temporary structure or may choose to obtain state
approval for an R-3 type dwelling under the Oregon Residential Specialty Code. The state is no
Agenda
Item
VII.A.
longer requiring approval of temporary wood-sided structures used or occupied by the public.
Again, manufacturers that choose to build temporary wood-sided structures – however identified
(“park trailer”, “tiny house”, etc.) – will need to seek approval directly from local government so
that planning, land use, fire and building code standards are effectively considered at the local
level. Those manufacturers seeking approval for permanent dwellings may choose to participate
in the state’s Pre-Fabricated Structures Program or work with local government.
These rules will remove the state’s preemption of local government over temporary wood-sided
structures (“park trailers”, “tiny houses”, etc.). Structures that are truly temporary in nature may
now be addressed by local government and manufacturers will no longer need state approval in
addition to local government approval.
The board will want to review proposed changes to the definition of RV’s on Page 3 of the
proposed rules. The other changes eliminate park trailer rules. Also enclosed is a copy of the
Temporary Structures and Uses code language adopted in the Oregon Residential Specialty
Code. The division is not proposing any changes to the existing residential code. We are only
providing the language for reference.
The division is requesting feedback from the board and the public before adopting these rules.
After receiving this feedback, the division will adopt a temporary rule and follow later with
permanent rule making. Because this matter is not the adoption of a dwelling code, the division
is seeking board input but does not need a formal vote of approval/disapproval. The division will
update the board once the temporary and permanent rule making is complete.
1
RV Minimum Safety Standards
January 11, 2017
918-525-0005
Definitions
The following definitions shall apply to OAR chapter 918, divisions 520, 525, and 530 and
are in addition to those included in ORS 446.003 and 455.010:
(1) “Accessible” means having access thereto, but which may require removal of an access
panel or opening a door.
(2) “Accessory Building” means an accessory building which specifically includes, but is not
limited to, cabanas, ramadas, storage sheds, and garages.
(3) “Accessory Structure” means an accessory structure which specifically includes, but is
not limited to, awnings, carports, decks, steps, and ramps.
(4) “Additional Living Space,” as used in these rules has two meanings:
(a) As it relates to a cabana, means a freestanding, self-supporting accessory building
installed adjacent to a recreational vehicle and subject to OAR 918-530-0320; or
(b) As it relates to additions to a recreational vehicle, means any attached structure that is
dependent upon the recreational vehicle for support or systems. These attached structures shall
be within the maximum allowable gross floor area of a non-motorized recreational vehicle, as
identified in OAR 918-525-0035, and are subject to OAR 918-525-0040 standards for
recreational vehicles or recreational park trailers as appropriate.
(5)(2) “Adjustment of Equipment” means the adjustment of the rate, flow, speed,
temperature, etc. as necessary for the continued operation of the equipment but does not include
the repair, replacement, conversion, alteration, or addition to any equipment.
(6) “Anchoring System” means any equipment or device designed to secure a recreational
vehicle for the purpose of resisting uplift, sliding, and overturning.
(7) “Controlled Fill” means fill intended to bear a structural load in which the fill material is
placed in layers of soil, crushed stone or masonry waste material, compacted and tested to ensure
it meets specified compaction standards determined by laboratory tests of soil samples from the
fill material.
(8)(3) “Design Option” means an option to a model or model group submitted with the
original model or with a model supplement.
(9) “Earthquake-resistant Bracing System” means a certified anchoring system, bracing
system, or other devices designed and constructed to protect the health and safety of the
occupants of, and reducing damage to, a recreational park trailer in the event of an earthquake.
(10)(4) “Field Technical Service” means the clarification of technical data, including but not
limited to division interpretations, or investigations, or training relating to the application of
laws, rules, standards, and regulations administered and enforced by the Building Codes
Division.
(11) “Full Foundation System” means a certified, engineered system of prefabricated
foundation supports installed to the pier manufacturer’s installation instructions.
(12)(5) “Labeled” means equipment or materials, used in the manufacture or installation of a
recreational vehicle, to which has been attached a label, symbol, or other identifying mark of a
nationally recognized testing laboratory, inspection agency, or other organization, which
evaluates products to nationally recognized standards and periodically inspects production of
2
equipment and materials to show compliance with those standards for usage in a specified
manner.
(13)(6) “Listing Agency” means an agency that:
(a) Is regularly engaged in conducting its own tests, or listing, labeling, or contracting its
testing procedures to a nationally recognized testing agency;
(b) Maintains a periodic inspection program on production of currently listed products; and
(c) Publishes, at a minimum, an annual report which is used to determine whether products
have been tested to such national standards and found safe for use in a specified manner.
(14) “Load Bearing Device” means any equipment or device used in the support of a
recreational vehicle including, but not limited to, footings, piers, caps, and shims.
(15) “Main Frame” means the part of the structural system of a recreational vehicle normally
used to transfer design load to the support system.
(16) “Minor Repair” means a simple repair such as replacing broken glass, fittings, devices,
or fixtures, using approved component parts, but does not include the repair or replacement of
major portions of the structural, plumbing, electrical, or mechanical systems or conversions,
alterations, or additions.
(17)(7) “Model” means an individual recreational vehicle designated by the manufacturer to
be manufactured to a specific floor plan, which includes specific structural components,
plumbing, electrical, and mechanical equipment, and installed and located in accordance with the
plans submitted to the division.
(18)(8) “Model Group” means two or more models with identical floor plans and plumbing,
electrical and mechanical systems but identified by different names, numbers, or letters.
(19)(9) “Noncompliance” means a failure of a recreational vehicle, equipment, or installation
to comply with these rules or the codes and standards described in OAR 918-525-0040.
(20)(10) “Notice of Violation” means written notification by the division stating the
recreational vehicle or equipment may not be used, rented, leased, or sold or offered for sale,
rent, or lease due to violations of ORS chapter 446 or these rules.
(21)(11) “Option Ready” means a provision made during the manufacture of a recreational
vehicle to facilitate the future installation of an appliance or other equipment (e.g., air
conditioner, generator, dishwasher).
(22) “Park Trailer” or “Recreational Park Trailer” means a recreational vehicle built on a
single chassis, mounted on wheels, which may be connected to utilities necessary for operation
of installed fixtures and appliances, and with a gross trailer area not exceeding 400 square feet
when in the set-up mode. Such a vehicle shall be referred to and identified by the manufacturer
or converter as a recreational vehicle.
(23) “Pier” means that portion of the support system between the footing and the recreational
vehicle.
(24)(12) “Plan Supplement” means the revision, modification, or updating of an existing
division-approved plan.
(25) “Prefabricated Pier” means a listed or approved pier which is manufactured at an off-site
location but does not include concrete blocks.
(26) “Ramada” means a stationary structure having a roof extending over a recreational
vehicle, which may also extend over a patio or parking space for motor vehicles, and is used
principally for protection from snow, ice, sun, or rain.
(27)(13) “Readily Accessible” means having direct access without the necessity of removing
a panel, door, or similar obstruction.
3
(28)(14) “Recreational Vehicle” means a vehicle as defined in ORS 446.003 and specifically
includes camping trailers, camping vehicles, motor homes, recreational park trailers, bus
conversions, van conversions, tent trailers, travel trailers, truck campers, combination vehicles
which include a recreational vehicle use, and any vehicle converted for use or partial use as a
recreational vehicle. Recreational Vehicles contain eating and sleeping facilities and are
equipped with one or more of the following:
(a) Holding tank(s);
(b) Liquid petroleum gas; or
(c) A 110 to 240 volt electrical systems.
is a vehicular-type unit that contains 12-volt interior and exterior lighting, eating and
sleeping facilities, is designed as temporary living quarters for recreational, seasonal or
emergency use, and has its own motive power or is mounted on or towed by another vehicle
and meets all of the following:
(a) Is regulated and registered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
as a vehicle or vehicle equipment;
(b) Does not require a special highway use permit for operation on the highways;
(c) Is deigned to be easily transported and set up on a daily basis by an individual;
(d) Is represented in NFPA 1192 Figure A.3.3.50;
(e) Has exterior wall and roof coverings of aluminum, fiberglass, composite or rubber
membrane; and
(f) Does not have a pitched roof.
(29) “Recreational Vehicle Site” means a designated parcel of land designed to accommodate
a recreational vehicle, its accessory structures or buildings and accessory equipment for the
exclusive use of the occupant’s recreational vehicle.
(30) “Registered Design Professional” as defined in the Oregon Residential Specialty Code
is an individual who is registered or licensed to practice their respective design profession as
defined by the statutory requirements of the professional registration laws of the state or
jurisdiction in which the project is to be constructed.
(31) “Regulated Repair” means an alteration, repair, or conversion regulated by the codes
and standards described in OAR 918-525-0040 but excludes those unregulated repairs described
in ORS 446.003(2)(b) and OAR 918-525-0350(2).
(32) Repair” means the reconstruction or renewal of any part of an existing recreational
vehicle or piece of equipment for the purpose of its maintenance.
(33) “Repair Operation” means any person in the business of making alterations, repairs, or
conversions to recreational vehicles or recreational vehicle equipment regulated by the division
under ORS Chapter 446 and these rules.
4
(34)(15) “Replacement in Kind” means replacing equipment or accessories with approved
like equipment or accessories such as switches, thermostats, fittings, elements, or motors, but
does not include the replacement of major portions of the structural, plumbing, electrical, or
mechanical systems.
(35) “Stabilizing Devices” means all components of the anchoring system and support
systems such as piers, footings, ties, anchoring equipment, ground anchors, and any other
equipment which supports or secures the recreational vehicle to the ground.
(36) “Stand” means that area of the recreational vehicle site which has been reserved for the
placement of a recreational vehicle or accessory structure.
(37) “Support System” means a combination of footings, piers, caps, and shims that will,
when properly installed, support the weight of the recreational vehicle, and all imposed live
loads.
(38) “Technician” means a quality assurance technician approved by the division to perform
inspections according to a repair operation’s quality assurance manual.
(39)(16) “Testing Laboratory” or “Testing Agency” means an organization:
(a) In the business of testing equipment and systems;
(b) Qualified and equipped to perform or to observe experimental testing to approved
standards;
(c) Not under the jurisdiction or control of any single manufacturer or supplier for an
affected industry;
(d) Publishing reports, including specific information about the equipment and systems
tested and found safe for use in a specified manner; and
(e) Whose methods and standards have been approved by the division.
(40)(17) “Travel Mode” means the overall size of the recreational vehicle as it travels on a
highway including all horizontal projections except for expandable rooms, retractable awnings,
exterior plumbing, mechanical, or electrical fixtures, or equipment or other minor exterior
attachments.
(41)(18) “Visual inspection” means an inspection by the division of the visible portions of
completed construction of a recreational vehicle for the purpose of identifying code violations
or approving and issuing an insignia of compliance.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.160
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.160
Hist.: BCA 1-1990, f. & cert. ef. 1-2-90 BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 25-
1996, f. 11-8-96, cert. ef. 1-1-97; BCD 11-1997, f. 7-23-97, cert. ef. 1-1-98; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-
14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef.
11-1-08; BCD 12-2011(Temp), f. 4-29-11, cert. ef. 5-2-11 thru 10-29-11 BCD 26-2011, f. 9-30-
11, cert. ef. 10-1-11
918-525-0015
Objective
The provisions of OAR chapter 918, division 525 apply to the design, and manufacture,
conversion, alteration, and repair of recreational vehicles and recreational park trailers rented,
leased, sold, installed, or offered for rent, lease, or sale in Oregon.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
5
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.155
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-525-0035
Allowable Floor Areas
(1) Recreational vehicles and recreational park trailers are limited to a maximum gross floor
area of 400 square feet in the setup mode, including all tip-outs, slide-outs, expandable rooms,
and other horizontal projections. The 400 square foot limitation does not apply to:
(a) Motorized recreational vehicles;
(b) Fifth wheel trailers up to 430 square feet in the setup mode;
(c) Vertical multi-level additions such as basements, second stories, lofts (mezzanines), or
overhead storage with a maximum ceiling height of five feet;
(d)(c) Any space less than five feet in height which does not increase the size of the
recreational vehicle or extend horizontally beyond the recreational vehicle floor line;
(e)(d) Bay windows, walk-a-bays, and other window projections with a floor or platform at
least 12 inches above the vehicle floor;
(f)(e) Space occupied by drawbars, couplings, hitches, or lights; or
(g) Exterior chassis mounted decks, landings, platforms, or porches that are not enclosed;
(h)(f) Eaves, Retractable awnings. , or porch roof overhangs; or
(i) Freestanding, self-supporting cabanas approved for use as accessory buildings adjacent to
the recreational park trailer according to OAR 918-530-0320.
(2) Factory-built porches, decks, roof overhangs, and other similar construction that is built
by the manufacturer and connected to and supported by a recreational vehicle shall not be
enclosed with walls, glass, or other solid materials if the gross floor area of the enclosure and the
recreational vehicle combined would exceed the maximum allowable gross floor area.
(3)(2) The gross floor area of a recreational vehicle shall may not be increased through the
use of a manufactured dwelling, another recreational vehicle, or through any other means except
as specifically permitted by these rules.
(4) Additions that are structurally attached to a recreational vehicle and depend on the
recreational vehicle for structural support or that are connected to the plumbing, mechanical, or
electrical systems of the recreational vehicle, shall be considered part of the recreational vehicle
or recreational park trailer, constructed to the recreational vehicle or recreational park trailer
codes as described in OAR 918-525-0040 and shall be included within the maximum gross floor
area allowed for the recreational vehicle and recreational park trailer.
(5)(3) The gross floor area of a combination vehicle shall may not exceed the maximum
allowable gross floor area if there is no permanent separation between the recreational vehicle
and the other use (i.e., horse trailer/recreational vehicle). When a combination vehicle has a
permanent wall separating the two uses, only the recreational vehicle portion of the combination
vehicle is limited to the maximum gross floor area.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.003 & 446.160
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.003 & 446.160
Hist.: BCD 25-1996, f. 11-8-96, cert. ef. 1-1-97; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
10-2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-00 thru 12-19-00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-
6
00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08; BCD 12-2011(Temp), f. 4-29-11, cert. ef. 5-2-
11 thru 10-29-11; BCD 26-2011, f. 9-30-11, cert. ef. 10-1-11
918-525-0040
Adopted Minimum Safety Standards
(1) The minimum safety standards for recreational vehicles are adopted pursuant to
OAR Chapter 918, Division 8.
(2) Effective October 1, 2011 January 17, 2017, the following standards are adopted by
reference as the standards for the manufacture, conversion, alteration, or repair of recreational
vehicles, recreational park trailers, accessory buildings, and accessory structures:
(1)(a) The 2011 2015 Edition of NFPA 1192, Standard on Recreational Vehicles, as
published by the National Fire Protection Association, and further amended by the Division.
(2) The 2009 Edition of ANSI 119.5, Standard for Recreational Park Trailers, as published
by the American National Standards Institute, and further amended by the Division.
(3)(b) The 2011 2014 Edition of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, specifically but not
limited to, Article 551 pertaining to Recreational Vehicles and Article 552 Park Trailers, as
published by the National Fire Protection Association, and further amended by the Division.
(4)(c) The 2011 2014 Edition of ANSI/RVIA Standard for Low Voltage Systems in
Conversion and Recreational Vehicles, as published by the Recreational Vehicle Industry
Association.
(5) The Oregon Residential Specialty Code, as adopted in OAR chapter 918, division 480,
and those standards referenced within are adopted as the Division’s standards for the
construction, manufacture, alteration, repair, and conversion of accessory buildings and
accessory structures used in conjunction with recreational vehicles and recreational park trailers.
[Publications referenced are available for review from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 183.325 - 183.410 & 446.003 - 446.285 455.030 & 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 1-1990, f. & cert. ef. 1-2-90; BCA 22-1990(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 9-4-90; BCA 27-
1990, f. 11-28-90, cert. ef. 11-30-90; BCA 16-1993, f. 8-12-93, cert. ef. 9-1-93: BCA 30-1993, f.
12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 16-1996, f. 8-6-96, cert. ef. 9-1-96; BCD 25-1996, f. 11-8-96,
cert. ef. 1-1-97; BCD 11-1997, f. 7-23-97, cert. ef. 1-1-98; BCD 22-1998, f. 11-9-98, cert. ef. 1-
1-99; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD 10-2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-
00 thru 12-19-00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-
1-08; BCD 26-2011, f. 9-30-11, cert. ef. 10-1-11
7
918-525-0045
Recreational Park Trailer Disclosures
(1) Dealers and distributors shall present each potential buyer of a new recreational park
trailer that is over 8-1/2 feet wide with a disclosure statement to read and sign prior to the
completion of the sales contract of any new recreational park trailer. Prior to presenting
disclosures to potential buyers and prior to any sale, dealers and distributors shall complete the
disclosure in writing indicating the date, dealer’s or distributor’s name, address, and Department
of Consumer and Business Services license number. Dealers and distributors shall give one
signed copy of the disclosure to the buyer and retain one signed copy in the dealer’s or
distributor’s files for not less than five years from the date of sale. Copies of signed disclosures
shall be made available to the division upon request.
(2) Dealers or distributors may reprint the division’s disclosure form or include the division’s
disclosure statement within their own sales contract. If a dealer or distributor prints its own
disclosure, the content shall be identical to the division’s disclosure statement and shall have not
less than a 10 point type size.
NOTE: Disclosure form can be found on the division website.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.260
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.260
Hist.: BCD 4-1998, f. 2-10-98, cert. ef. 7-1-98; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-
2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-525-0055
Recreational Park Trailer License Requirements
Persons engaged in the business of installing recreational park trailers, accessory structures,
and accessory buildings are not required to have a division issued manufactured dwelling
installer’s license but are required to be licensed by the Construction Contractors Board. Persons
in the business of making on-site electrical or plumbing installations shall be licensed by the
division according to ORS 479.620, 693.030, or 447.060.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-
2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-525-0370
Permit Requirements
(1) No person shall install a recreational park trailer over 8-1/2 feet wide in the travel mode
without first obtaining an installation permit from the building official.
(2) No person shall construct or install an accessory building or accessory structure without
first obtaining all required permits and approvals from the building official. The building official
may require compliance with planning, zoning, health, sanitation, flood plain, sewage disposal,
fire mitigation, and accessibility regulations prior to issuing permits or approvals.
(3) The permit application for the construction, alteration, or repair shall be accompanied by:
(a) Construction plans and specifications that meet all or part of the requirements of OAR
918-525-0220, if required by the division; and
8
(b) Permit or inspection fees as set by OAR 918-525-0510.
(4) Permit applications and permit fees for the construction of accessory buildings, accessory
structures, or any other site-built construction shall be according to those regulations adopted by
the building official.
(5) Every permit issued under these rules shall expire by limitation and become null and void
if the work authorized by the permit is not started within 180 days from the date the permit is
issued, or if the work authorized by the permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180
days at any time after the work is started. A new permit shall be obtained before any work is
resumed.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.160
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 25-1996, f. 11-8-96, cert. ef. 1-1-97; BCD
9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD 10-2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-00 thru 12-
19-00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-525-0510
Fees
The following fees apply to the division only and do not apply to municipalities.
(1) Inspection Fee:
(a) $45 for an inspection requiring one hour or less;
(b) $22.50 for every 30 minutes or fraction exceeding one hour, including travel time and
mileage; and
(c) Mileage shall must be paid at the rate established by the Oregon Department of
Administrative Services.
(2) Field Technical Service Fee:
(a) $45 for service requiring one hour or less;
(b) $22.50 for every 30 minutes or fraction exceeding one hour, including travel time and
mileage; and
(c) Mileage shall must be paid at the rate established by the Oregon Department of
Administrative Services.
(3) Out-of-State Inspection or Field Technical Service Fee: In addition to the hourly charges
of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the division shall must be reimbursed for actual cost
based on published air fare or equivalent, plus necessary surface transportation and cost for food
and lodging consistent with the allowances established by the Oregon Department of
Administrative Services for authorized state employee travel.
(4) Reinspection Fee: Same fee schedule as noted in sections (1), (2), and (3) of this rule.
(5) Quality Assurance Manual Fee: $30 for initial review of manuals and $20 for review of
manual supplements. This fee includes the initial issuance of five insignia to certified repair
operations.
(6) Plan Renewal Fee: $15 for administrative costs of renewing plans.
(7) Plan Supplement Fee: Same fee schedule as noted in sections (13) through (18) of this
rule.
(8) Change of Name, ownership or Address Fee: $20 for each change.
(9) Insignia Label Fee: $25 per insignia for manufacturers and $5 for a lot of five insignias
for repair operations.
9
(10) Replacement Insignia Fee: $25 per insignia for manufacturers and $5 for a lot of five
insignias for repair operations.
(11) Registration Fee: $25 per manufacturer or operation.
(12) Annual Registration Renewal Fee: $20 per manufacturer or operation.
(13) Plan Filing Fee: $10 for each submittal.
(14) Plan Approval Model Fee: $15.
(15) Plumbing Supplement Fees:
(a) Drain, waste and Vent: $20 for each plan submitted;
(b) Potable Water: $10 for each plan submitted.
(16) Electrical Supplement Fees:
(a) 12 Volt: $20 for each plan submitted;
(b) 120 to 240 Volt: $20 for each plan submitted;
(c) Generator: $10 for each plan submitted.
(17) Mechanical Supplement Fee: $10 for each plan submitted.
(18) Model Floor Plan Supplement Fee: $15 for each plan submitted and $5 for each model
number supplement.
(19) Design Option, Plan Approval Model, or Number Change Fee: $20.
(20) Recreational Vehicle Visual Inspection Fee: $30. This fee includes the insignia label,
one initial inspection and one reinspection.
(21) Recreational Vehicle Alteration Permit Fee: $30. This fee includes one initial inspection
and one reinspection.
(22) Permit Reinspection Fee: $25.
(23) Recreational Park Trailer Installation Fee: $105 per installation. This fee includes
inspection of the stand and lot preparation; all support blocking; flood and wind anchoring
devices; perimeter skirting; under-floor access and ventilation; temporary steps; and plumbing;
mechanical, and electrical connections, when all work is ready for inspection at one time.
(24) Recreational Park Trailer Installation Reinspection Fee: $85 per reinspection.
(25) Fees for the construction or installation of accessory buildings and accessory structures
shall be those required by the municipality.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available for review at the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.160 & 446.176
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.160 & 446.176
Hist.: BCA 1-1990, f. & cert. ef. 1-2-90; BCA 10-1992, f. 6-15-92, cert. ef. 7-1-92; BCA 30-
1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 14-1996(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 7-1-96; BCD 24-1996, f. &
cert. ef. 11-8-96; BCD 12-1998(Temp), f. 6-2-98, cert. ef. 7-1-98 thru 12-27-98; BCD 23-1998,
f. 11-9-98, cert. ef. 11-15-98; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert.
ef. 12-19-00; BCD 1-2005, f. & cert. ef. 3-1-05; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
10
DIVISION 530
RECREATIONAL PARK TRAILER AND
CABANA INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS
918-530-0005
General Requirements
(1) All recreational park trailers exceeding 8-1/2 feet in width shall be installed to the
manufacturer’s installation instructions and where applicable, to these rules except for
recreational park trailers installed temporarily on display or in storage and not occupied or
intended to be occupied. This exception does not include recreational park trailers installed in
recreational vehicle parks, mobile home parks, or subdivisions.
(2) Cabanas used in conjunction with a recreational vehicles or recreational park trailers shall
be installed according to the manufacturer’s installation instructions, the Oregon Residential
Specialty Code and the provisions of these rules.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0010
Site Preparation
(1) Each site shall be suitable for its intended use and shall comply with applicable federal,
state, and local laws.
(2) When, during preparation of the site, unforeseen factors such as rock formation, high
ground water levels, springs, or biological generated gasses are encountered, corrective work
shall be taken prior to the siting of the recreational park trailer or accessory building and
structure.
(3) Grades shall slope downward away from patios, stands, walls, skirting, foundations, and
water supply wells.
(4) Site grading and drainage shall:
(a) Provide a diversion of any surface water away from the recreational park trailer,
accessory building, and structures and stands except as necessary for controlled irrigation; and
(b) Prevent standing water and soil saturation from becoming detrimental to structures and
site use.
(5) Recreational park trailer stands without a subsurface drainage system shall have a crown
gradient for surface drainage acceptable to the building official.
(6) Grading, plantings, or drainage systems shall be constructed to prevent erosion of the
recreational park trailer stand from high velocity water runoff.
(7) Where natural soils or controlled fill (free of grass and organic material) are used, such
soils or fill shall support the loads imposed by the support system of the recreational park trailer
and cabana placed thereon.
11
(8) Up to 6” of non-compacted crushed rock or gravel, no smaller than 3/4” minus, may be
placed on a recreational park trailer or cabana stand without affecting the soil bearing capacity of
the stand.
(9) Provisions shall be made to reduce moisture and humidity in under-floor spaces by
installing a continuous membrane sheeting vapor barrier to cover the ground surface or pavement
within the perimeter enclosure of the recreational park trailer or cabana stand. A uniform six mil
black polyethylene, linear low density poly (6x) sheet material or other approved equivalent
membrane vapor barrier materials shall be installed for this purpose according to the following:
(a) Membrane seams shall be overlapped by at least eight inches;
(b) Edges of the sheeting shall extend to the perimeter of the recreational park trailer;
(c) Stones or bricks shall be placed over seams and around the point of contact of the
sheeting with the perimeter enclosure on a spacing of approximately eight feet to maintain a
reasonable seal between sheets and the foundation material;
(d) All holes, tears, and penetrations in the membrane shall be adequately patched and sealed
with permanent tape;
(e) Under-floor continuous membrane sheeting vapor barrier shall not contact wood that is
not treated foundation grade lumber; and
(f) Under-floor continuous membrane sheeting vapor barrier shall not be placed under
concrete slabs.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0020
Foundation Systems
(1) This rule prescribes Oregon standards for siting, design and installation of recreational
park trailer foundation systems and identifies acceptable foundation systems.
(2) The foundation shall be capable of transferring design vertical loads and other loads
unique to local sites due to wind, seismic, and water conditions imposed by or on the structure
into the underlying soil bedrock without failure. The building official may approve an
installation design and materials not contained in these rules.
(3) Except for axles, wheels, tires, hitches, and transportation lights designed to be detached
from the vehicle, no portion of a recreational park trailer transportation platform (chassis) shall
be removed before or after the recreational park trailer is installed. Detached transportation
equipment shall be left on the site for future use.
(4) Recreational park trailers shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s installation
instructions. Where manufacturer’s installation instructions are not available for relocated
recreational park trailers, installations shall meet the minimum requirements in these rules.
(5) Footings shall be a minimum of 256 square inches of pressure-treated wood on all six
sides, precast concrete or poured-in-place concrete, including unreinforced slabs or runners.
Footings shall be at least equal in area to the piers they support. Footings shall be placed level on
a stand free of grass and organic materials.
(6) Piers shall be spaced at a maximum of four feet on center under the main frame (I-beam
or channel beam). Pier spacing may be offset up to six inches for obstructions such as outriggers,
12
cross members, axles and utilities. Piers shall not exceed 36 inches in height under the main
frame (I-beam or channel beam). Piers shall be:
(a) Constructed of a single stack of open 8” x 8” x 16” concrete blocks with open cells
placed vertically upon the footing. Single stacked block piers shall be installed with the 16-inch
dimension perpendicular to the main frame (I-beam or channel beam). The pier blocks shall be
capped with concrete or wood pier caps equal in area to the top of the pier blocking then
shimmed tight to the bottom of the main frame (I-beam or channel beam) with wood blocks and
wedges;
(b) Designed by a registered design professional and approved by the building official; or
(c) Prefabricated piers tested, listed, and labeled by a nationally recognized testing and
listing laboratory. Prefabricated piers shall be tested to their dead load plus superimposed live
load equal to three times the required live load using the test procedures in the Manufactured
Home Construction and Safety Standards 24 CFR 3280.401. Prefabricated piers and load bearing
devices shall be permanently marked or labeled with the following information:
(A) The product’s intended use;
(B) The product manufacturer’s name and location;
(C) The product’s model or identification number;
(D) The product’s design loads or capacity;
(E) The product’s tested or calculated loads;
(F) The name, logo, or identification mark of the testing laboratory and listing agency; and
(G) The product’s test report and listing numbers.
(d) Piers may be replaced in part with approved earthquake-bracing system components.
(e) Piers may be replaced in whole with an approved full foundation system.
(7) Earthquake-resistant bracing systems and full foundation systems when used with a
recreational park trailer shall be:
(a) Approved for its intended use;
(b) Labeled to identify the component’s model or identification number, manufacturer’s
name and location, testing and listing laboratory name or logo, testing and listing report
numbers, certification expiration date, components tested or calculated loads, and minimum
design loads or capacity;
(c) Installed according to the manufacturer’s installation instructions; and
(d) Provided with installation instructions to be left on the job site for the inspectors use.
(8) A minimum clearance of 18 inches shall be maintained beneath the lowest member of the
main frame (I-beam or channel beam).
(9) Under the main frame, (I-beam or channel beam) pier supports shall be placed not more
than two feet from the exterior of each end wall. All pier supports shall be installed (centered)
directly under and perpendicular to each main frame of the recreational park trailer.
(10) Retaining walls used to resist the lateral displacement of soil and other materials shall be
designed to resist the lateral pressure of the retained material in accordance with accepted
engineering practices. A retaining wall shall not rely on the recreational park trailer for support.
Retaining walls shall be constructed of treated foundation grade wood, concrete, masonry, or
other approved materials or combinations of these materials according to the Oregon
Residential Specialty Code.
(11) All fill and backfill soil surrounding the recreational park trailer shall be compacted to
not allow displacement. Soil grading around the recreational park trailer shall allow water to
13
drain away from the recreational park trailer at a slope of 1/2-foot vertical for every 12 feet
horizontal.
(12) Regardless of the type foundation system provided, the foundation construction shall
assure a level recreational park trailer or cabana floor.
(13) All lumber and concrete described in these rules are identified by their nominal sizes
only. Actual sizes may vary from 1/8-inch to 3/4-inch.
(14) All poured in place concrete shall cure seven days prior to installation of the recreational
park trailer or cabana and shall have a compressive strength not less than 2,500 pounds per
square inch in 28 days.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
10-2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-00 thru 12-19-00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-
00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0040
Anchoring Systems
(1) To resist overturning and lateral movement from high winds, all recreational park trailers
installed in the following counties shall be anchored: Clatsop, Tillamook, Lincoln, Coos, Curry,
Multnomah, Hood River, Sherman, Gilliam, Morrow, and Umatilla; Lane and Douglas if located
within 20 miles of the coast; and Wasco County if located within 30 miles of the Columbia
River.
(2) To resist movement and reduce damage, all recreational park trailers installed in
designated flood plain areas shall be anchored when required by a municipality.
(3) Anchoring systems shall be designed and tested according to the Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards 24 CFR 3280.306. Anchoring systems shall be:
(a) Designed by a registered design professional and approved by the building official; or
(b) Manufactured, tested, listed, and labeled as capable of meeting all the requirements of
this rule. Each manufactured anchoring system shall be installed according to the manufacturer’s
installation instructions. Each manufactured anchoring system shall be permanently marked or
labeled with the following information:
(A) The product’s intended use;
(B) The product manufacturer’s name and location;
(C) The product’s model or identification number;
(D) The product’s design loads or capacity;
(E) The product’s soil classification and soil depth when applicable;
(F) The product’s tested or calculated loads;
(G) The name, logo, or identification mark of the testing laboratory and listing agency; and
(H) The product’s test report and listing numbers.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
14
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0050
Skirting
(1) Skirting on recreational park trailers and cabanas shall be installed where specifically
required by local ordinance.
(2) Skirting shall be of material suitable for exterior exposure. Untreated wood shall not be
nearer than 5-1/2 inches to any earth, unless separated by three inches of metal or foundation
grade lumber. Field cut ends, notches, and drilled holes of pressure-treated foundation grade
lumber shall be retreated in the field according to AWPA U1-04.
(3) Skirting shall be installed according to the material manufacturer’s installation
instructions and these rules.
(4) Skirting shall be adequately secured to assure stability, minimize vibration, susceptibility
to wind damage, and to compensate for possible frost heave.
(5) All holes or gaps between the skirting and the ground or other locations shall be
substantially sealed to limit the entrance of wind and water.
(6) Access openings through skirting shall be not less than 18” x 24” and located as close as
practical to the utilities so fuel, electric, water, and sewer connections located under the
recreational park trailer are accessible for inspection, service, and repair. Such access panels or
doors shall not require tools or operation of more than four devices to remove or open. There
shall be a minimum 30-inch access space directly in front of each access panel or door.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0060
Ventilation of Skirting
(1) Provisions shall be made to minimize condensation in underfloor areas through
ventilation openings.
(2) If combustion air for heat-producing appliance(s) is taken from within the under-floor
areas, ventilation shall be adequate to assure proper operation of appliances.
(3) A minimum of four ventilation openings shall be provided from the under-floor space to
the exterior. A ventilation opening shall be placed at, or as near to, each corner as practicable and
as high as practicable, except in flood hazard areas where the ventilation opening shall be near
the bottom of the skirting. The total net free area for ventilation shall be 200 square inches or one
square foot for every 300 square feet of under-floor area whichever is less. Openings shall
provide cross ventilation on at least two sides. The openings shall be covered with 1/4-inch
corrosion resistant wire mesh or with louvered openings with not less than 1/8-inch screen to
retard entry of dry vegetation, waste materials, or rodents. The net free area of a vent shall not be
diminished in size by vent hardware.
(4) Intake air for indoor ventilation purposes shall not be drawn from under floor spaces of
the recreational park trailer or cabana. (This does not include combustion air.)
15
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0070
Electrical Connections
(1) Recreational park trailers shall be connected to power sources according to Article 552 of
the NFPA 70, National Electrical Code
(2) Accessory equipment, structures, and buildings shall not be powered by the recreational
park trailer electrical system.
(3) At the time of installation, all recreational park trailers shall be tested to the following
criteria:
(a) All 110 volt electrical receptacle outlets shall be subjected to a polarity test to determine
all connections have been made properly; and
(b) All electrical lights, equipment, ground fault circuit interrupters, and appliances shall be
subjected to an operational test to demonstrate all equipment is connected and in working order.
[Publications referenced are available for review from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08; BCD 26-2011, f. 9-30-11, cert. ef. 10-1-11
918-530-0080
Plumbing Connections
Recreational park trailers and cabanas shall be connected to water sources and waste disposal
terminals according to the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code and to the following standards:
(1) A full way shutoff valve shall be provided on the water supply serving each recreational
park trailer site.
(2) The water inlet shall be connected to the site water supply outlet by an approved flexible
connector not less than 3/4-inch nominal diameter or by other approved means identified in the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code.
(3) Where static water pressure exceeds 80 pounds per square inch, a pressure regulator shall
be installed.
(4) The water distribution system of the recreational park trailer and cabana and the supply
connection shall be subjected to a test to assure there is no evidence of leakage under normal
operating pressure. If water under normal operating pressure is not available, the recreational
park trailer and cabana water distribution system shall show no evidence of leakage, by
sustaining 80 pounds per square inch of air pressure for 15 minutes.
(5) Each recreational park trailer and cabana shall be connected to the sewer inlet by means
of a three-inch diameter drain connector consisting of approved pipe, not less than schedule 40,
appropriate directional fittings and listed and approved shielded flexible connectors at each end
of the pipe.
16
(6) The recreational park trailer and cabana drainage piping system shall be connected to the
lot or site drain inlet and tested by allowing water to flow into all fixtures and receptors,
including the clothes washer standpipe, for a period of three minutes. If water under pressure is
not available, the drainage piping system shall be tested by dumping at least three gallons of
water into each fixture and receptor. Each P-trap shall be visible during this test to assure there is
no evidence of leaks.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0090
Mechanical
(1) Mechanical equipment installed outside of and not supported by the recreational park
trailer or cabana shall be mounted two inches above grade on a level concrete slab not less than
three inches thick, a three-inch thick precast reinforced concrete slab or be mounted according to
the applicable equipment manufacturer’s installation instructions.
(2) Mechanical equipment shall not be installed:
(a) In a manner which obstructs any exit door;
(b) In a window opening which is part of an emergency egress system; and
(c) Where it might obstruct sidewalks or any means of egress from the recreational park
trailer or cabana.
(3) Exhaust duct systems of clothes dryers, applicable cook tops, and other appliances shall
not terminate beneath the recreational park trailer or cabana. Exhaust ducts shall be routed
through the skirting to the exterior. Exhaust duct installations shall have no dips or traps and
shall be installed according to the applicable appliance manufacturer’s installation instructions.
(4) Moisture or heat producing appliances, such as dryers and applicable cook tops, shall be
vented to the outside atmosphere to insure moisture-laden air is carried out beyond the perimeter
of the recreational park trailer.
(5) Exhaust ducts shall be installed according to the appliance manufacturer’s installation
instructions and the following requirements:
(a) The duct shall be a minimum of four inches in diameter unless otherwise specified by the
appliance manufacturer;
(b) The duct material shall be metal or listed flexible metal if approved by the appliance
manufacturer;
(c) There shall be no dips in the duct run;
(d) There shall be no screws, mechanical fasteners, screens, or any other obstructions
extending into any interior portion of the duct;
(e) The total length of the duct shall not exceed 15 feet unless otherwise specified by the
appliance manufacturer;
(f) There shall not be more than two 90-degree elbow fittings or four 45-degree elbow
fittings installed in the duct run; and
(g) The duct termination shall be equipped with a back-draft damper.
17
(6) When installed, adequate distance shall be maintained under the recreational park trailer
and cabana for an external air conditioning or heat pump duct. The external air conditioning or
heat pump duct shall be supported off the ground, providing a one-inch minimum ground
clearance and be supported and connected according to the appliance manufacturer’s installation
instructions. Ducts shall not be crushed, dented, compressed, have sharp bends, or stress at the
connections. All tears, holes, and penetrations in ducts shall be repaired and sealed.
(7) Inlets or outlets of an exhaust vent, combustion air vent, return air vent, or any other vent
opening capable of conveying air or gasses into or out of the recreational park trailer or cabana,
or to or from any appliance used in conjunction with the recreational park trailer, shall not be
located in an area where an accessory building is to be sited.
(8) Inlets or outlets of an exhaust vent, combustion air vent, return air vent, condensation
drain, or any other vent opening capable of conveying air or gasses into or out of the recreational
park trailer or cabana, or to or from any appliance used in conjunction with the recreational park
trailer or cabana, shall not be located under the recreational park trailer when located over a
basement.
(9) Condensation drains from air conditioning, heat pumps, evaporative coolers,
dehumidifiers, refrigeration equipment, or any other appliance shall not terminate under a
recreational park trailer or cabana.
(10) Mechanical installations not a part of the recreational park trailer shall be in
conformance with the Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0100
Fuel Supply
(1) All fuel gas piping systems serving recreational park trailers and cabanas shall be
designed and constructed according to applicable provisions of the Oregon Residential
Specialty Code.
(2) Where fuel gas is provided, each recreational park trailer site shall have a listed gas shut
off valve installed upstream from the recreational park trailer site gas outlet. Such valve shall not
be located under any recreational park trailer or cabana. The outlet shall be equipped with a cap
or plug to prevent discharge of gas whenever the recreational park trailer site outlet is not
connected to a recreational park trailer or cabana.
(3) Each gas supply shall be connected to the recreational park trailer with an approved six-
foot flexible gas connector.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
18
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0110
Access
(1) Required egress doors on recreational park trailers shall be accessible by steps or ramps
or have door thresholds within eight inches of grade.
(2) All ramps, decks, hand rails, guard rails, stairs, steps, porches, and landings constructed
adjacent to a recreational park trailer to be used by the occupants of the recreational park trailer
shall be constructed in conformance with the Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0120
Rodent Proofing
All cuts, holes, or tears in the bottom board or floor insulation, including but not limited to
areas around plumbing, mechanical, and heating equipment penetrations shall be adequately
repaired and sealed to prevent the entrance of rodents and limit heat loss.
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99; BCD
25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0310
Accessory Buildings and Structures
(1) Accessory buildings and accessory structures shall be designed, constructed, and installed
according to the Oregon Residential Specialty Code and these rules.
(2) Accessory buildings and accessory structures shall not obstruct required egress windows,
exit doors, appliance access, exhaust vents or ducts, chimney or flue pipes, combustion air inlets,
drains, sewer vents, or the utility access of a recreational vehicle or a recreational park trailer.
(3) Accessory buildings and accessory structures shall be free standing, self-supporting
structures. No loads shall be imposed on a recreational vehicle or recreational park trailer from
the installation of an accessory building or accessory structure unless approved by the building
official.
(4) The total area of all accessory buildings and accessory structures on the same lot, in a
recreation park, shall not exceed 400 square feet in area except as provided below:
(a) Where the accessory building is a cabana, the size restrictions in OAR 918-530-0320
shall apply;
19
(b) Where an accessory building or accessory structure has a six-foot clearance to all
recreational vehicles, accessory buildings, and accessory structures, the size limitations of this
section shall not apply;
(c) Where an accessory building or accessory structure has a three-foot clearance and is
provided with a minimum of one-hour fire-resistive construction on the wall facing any
recreational vehicle, accessory building or accessory structure, the size limitations of this section
shall not apply;
(d) Where the accessory structure is a deck, patio, or ramada, the size limitations of this
section shall not apply;
(e) Factory-built porches, decks, eaves, roof overhangs, and other construction that is built
by the manufacturer and connected to and supported by the recreational vehicle shall not be
counted within the size limitations of this section; and
(f) Where more than one accessory building or accessory structure occupies the same space
(i.e., landing, ramp or stairs under an awning or carport), the area shall only be counted once
within the size limitations of this section.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.155, 446.185 & 446.240
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185 & 446.240
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 24-1994, f. 10-26-94, cert. ef. 11-1-94;
BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99, Renumbered from 918-535-0010; BCD 10-
2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-00 thru 12-19-00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00;
BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0320
Cabanas
(1) A cabana may be installed or constructed as an accessory building to a recreational
vehicle according to the following restrictions:
(a) Cabanas shall not be designed or constructed to include sleeping or cooking facilities;
(b) Cabanas shall be restricted in size to a total of 240 square feet of gross floor area per
recreational vehicle; and
(c) Cabanas shall not contain gas, liquid or solid fuel-burning fireplaces, fireplace stoves,
room heaters or pellet-fired appliances.
(2) Cabanas shall be designed and constructed as freestanding, self-supporting structures.
Cabanas may be attached to a recreational vehicle or recreational park trailer only with
appropriate flashing or sealing materials to provide a weather seal.
(3) Each cabana shall have an exit door opening directly to the outside without passing
through the recreational vehicle.
(4) Cabanas shall have smoke alarms installed according to Section 313 of the Oregon
Residential Specialty Code. The smoke alarm in the cabana is not required to be interconnected
with the smoke alarm(s) in the recreational vehicle.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
20
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99,
Renumbered from 918-535-0020; BCD 10-2000(Temp), f. 6-21-00, cert. ef. 6-23-00 thru 12-19-
00; BCD 29-2000, f. & cert. ef. 12-19-00; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-530-0340
Ramadas
(1) A ramada may be constructed or installed as an accessory to a recreational vehicle or
recreational park trailer.
(2) A ramada or any portion thereof shall have a clearance of not less than 36 inches in a
vertical direction above the highest portion of a recreational vehicle or recreational park trailer
roof and not less than 18 inches in a horizontal direction from each side of a recreational vehicle.
(3) Cross braces, architectural appurtenances, and structural ties shall not obstruct the
installation or removal of any recreational vehicle or recreational park trailer.
(4) Recreational park trailers with roof extensions or sited under a ramada that also have
solid fuel burning appliances installed shall have the chimney, flue, or vent for the solid fuel
burning appliance installed through the roof extension or ramada according to the appliance
manufacturer’s installation instructions. Chimney, flue, or vent pipe extensions shall be of the
same type, brand, and specifications as the original pipes used in the recreational park trailer.
Shipped-loose chimney, flue, or vent sections and equipment for solid fuel burning appliance
shall be installed according to the appliance manufacturer’s installation instructions. If
manufacturer’s installation instructions are not available, installations shall comply with the
mechanical chapters of the Oregon Residential Specialty Code.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.185
Stats. Implemented: ORS 446.185
Hist.: BCA 30-1993, f. 12-1-93, cert. ef. 1-1-94; BCD 9-1999, f. 7-14-99, cert. ef. 9-1-99,
Renumbered from 918-535-0040; BCD 25-2008, f. 10-31-08, cert. ef. 11-1-08
918-098-1305
Manufactured Structure Installation Inspector Certification
(1) Scope of Activities and Authority.
(a) A manufactured structure installation inspector conducts onsite field inspections of
manufactured dwelling or park trailer installations including site preparation, setbacks, drainage,
stand, foundation support, earthquake bracing systems, tie-downs, under-floor enclosures,
access, egress, plumbing utility connections (within 30 lineal feet of the manufactured dwelling),
mechanical connections and electrical feeder assembly connections (as defined by Article 550 of
the National Electrical Code), electrical fixture connections, and plumbing, mechanical, and
electrical crossover connections for manufactured structures under ORS 446.230 and 446.240;
(b) This certification does not include inspections or plan reviews of manufactured dwelling
alterations or manufactured structure accessory structures and accessory buildings. See OAR
918-098-1325 and 918-098-1330 for certification requirements.
(c) This certification can be used only in a jurisdiction that:
(A) Meets all of the requirements of this rule and OAR 918-500-0055;
21
(B) Complies with ORS 446.250 and 446.253(2) relating to the delegation of full
responsibility for permit issuance and inspections;
(C) Issues permits according to ORS 446.253; and
(D) Enforces the current edition of the Oregon Manufactured Dwelling Installation
Specialty Code, the provisions of OAR chapter 918, division 500, and all referenced standards
contained therein.
(2) A Manufactured Structure Installation Inspector must also possess an Oregon Inspector
Certification issued under OAR 918-098-1025 prior to performing inspections.
(3) Revocation. The division is authorized to revoke this certification under ORS 446.255.
Persons certified under this rule who fail to meet the minimum continuing education
requirements are subject to revocation. If the minimum continuing education is met within 60
days from the date it was originally due, the division may discontinue any pending revocation
action based on a failure to meet minimum continuing education requirements.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.250, 446.255 & 455.720
Stat. Implemented: ORS 446.250, 446.255 & 455.720
Hist.: BCA 25-1990, f. & cert. ef. 10-17-90; BCD 13-1997, f. 9-18-97, cert. ef. 10-1-97;
Renumbered from 918-099-0135; BCD 16-2005(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 7-7-05 thru 12-31-05,
Renumbered from 918-098-0310; BCD 24-2005, f. 9-30-05, cert. ef. 10-1-05, Renumbered from
918-098-0310; BCD 19-2006, f. 12-29-06, cert. ef. 1-1-07; BCD 1-2010, f. 3-1-10, cert. ef. 4-1-
10; BCD 6-2010, f. 5-14-10, cert. ef. 7-1-10; BCD 7-2011, f. & cert. ef. 3-11-11; BCD 24-2011,
f. 7-26-11, cert. ef. 10-1-11; BCD 6-2016, f. & cert. ef. 4-1-16
918-098-1325
Requirements for Alteration Inspection and Plan Review of Manufactured Dwellings
Unless stated otherwise within this rule, this rule is applied retroactively from July 1, 2010.
(1) Scope of Work. Manufactured dwelling alteration inspections and plan reviews include
on-site field inspections of alterations including structural, fire and life safety, electrical,
plumbing, and mechanical alterations made to manufactured dwellings after the initial sale of the
home to the first consumer after all the terms of the sales contract have been met. Most alteration
inspections made prior to this time are the responsibility of the division and must be performed
by a certified manufactured structure construction inspector. All alteration inspections made to
recreational vehicles and park trailers are the responsibility of the division and must be
performed by a certified recreational vehicle inspector.
(2) Certifications. Inspectors of manufactured dwelling alterations are required to be certified
by ORS 446.250. The division requires that persons performing inspections or plan reviews on
manufactured dwelling alterations have:
(a) An Oregon Inspector Certification and the appropriate Oregon Code Certification under
OAR 918-098-1015 for the Oregon Residential Specialty Code for the specific discipline being
used; or
(b) An Oregon Inspector Certification and the appropriate ICC Residential Certification as
described in OAR 918-098-1010.
22
(3) The requirement in section (2) is not applicable to alteration inspections performed on
manufactured homes still under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), recreational vehicles, or park trailers.
(4) Authority. Inspectors and plans examiners of manufactured dwelling alterations may only
inspect or review plans in a jurisdiction that has been delegated the manufactured dwelling
alteration program and that:
(a) Complies with ORS 446.250 and 446.253(2) relating to the delegation of full
responsibility for permit issuance and inspections;
(b) Issues permits and enforces the current edition of ORS chapter 446 and OAR chapter
918, divisions 500 and 520;
(c) Meets the requirements of OAR 918-500-0055 for delegation; and
(d) Enforces the current edition of the Oregon Manufactured Dwelling Installation
Specialty Code and all referenced standards contained therein.
[Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.]
Stat. Auth.: ORS 446.250 & 455.720
Stat. Implemented: ORS 446.250 & 455.720
Hist.: BCD 13-1997, f. 9-18-97, cert. ef. 10-1-97; BCD 16-2005(Temp), f. & cert. ef. 7-7-05 thru
12-31-05, Renumbered from 918-098-0350; BCD 24-2005, f. 9-30-05, cert. ef. 10-1-05,
Renumbered from 918-098-0350; BCD 19-2006, f. 12-29-06, cert. ef. 1-1-07; BCD 1-2010, f. 3-
1-10, cert. ef. 4-1-10; BCD 6-2010, f. 5-14-10, cert. ef. 7-1-10; BCD 7-2011, f. & cert. ef. 3-11-
11; BCD 24-2011, f. 7-26-11, cert. ef. 10-1-11
R106.2 Site plan or plot plan. The construction documentssubmitted with the application for permit shall be accompaniedby a site plan showing the size and location of new constructionand existing structures on the site and distances from lot lines.In the case of demolition, the site plan shall show constructionto be demolished and the location and size of existing struc-tures and construction that are to remain on the site or plot. Thebuilding official is authorized to waive or modify the require-ment for a site plan when the application for permit is for alter-ation or repair or when otherwise warranted.
R106.3 Examination of documents. The building officialshall examine or cause to be examined accompanying con-struction documents and shall ascertain by such examinationwhether the construction indicated and described is in accor-dance with the requirements of this code and other pertinentlaws or ordinances.
R106.3.1 Approval of construction documents. When thebuilding official issues a permit, the construction documentsshall be approved in writing or by a stamp which states“REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE.” One set ofconstruction documents so reviewed shall be retained by thebuilding official. The other set shall be returned to the appli-cant, shall be kept at the site of work and shall be open toinspection by the building official or a duly authorized rep-resentative. Construction documents shall be approved inthe timelines specified in ORS 455.467.
Note: ORS 455.467 is available online at www.bcd.ore-gon.gov.
R106.3.2 Previous approvals. This code shall not requirechanges in the construction documents, construction or des-ignated occupancy of a structure for which a lawful permithas been heretofore issued or otherwise lawfully autho-rized, and the construction of which has been pursued ingood faith within 180 days after the effective date of thiscode and has not been abandoned.
R106.3.3 Phased approval. The building official is autho-rized to issue a permit for the construction of foundations orany other part of a building or structure before the construc-tion documents for the whole building or structure havebeen submitted, provided that adequate information anddetailed statements have been filed complying with perti-nent requirements of this code. The holder of such permitfor the foundation or other parts of a building or structureshall proceed at the holder’s own risk with the building oper-ation and without assurance that a permit for the entirestructure will be granted.
R106.3.4 Design professional in responsible charge.
106.3.4.1 General. When it is required that documents beprepared by a registered design professional, the buildingofficial shall be authorized to require the owner to engageand designate on the building permit application a regis-tered design professional who shall act as the registereddesign professional in responsible charge. If the circum-stances require, the owner shall designate a substitute regis-tered design professional in responsible charge who shallperform the duties required of the original registered designprofessional in responsible charge. The building official
shall be notified in writing by the owner if the registereddesign professional in responsible charge is changed or isunable to continue to perform the duties.
The registered design professional in responsiblecharge shall be responsible for reviewing and coordinat-ing submittal documents prepared by others, includingphased and deferred submittal items, for compatibilitywith the design of the building.
R106.4 Amended construction documents. Work shall beinstalled in accordance with the approved construction docu-ments, and any changes made during construction that are not incompliance with the approved construction documents shall beresubmitted for approval as an amended set of construction doc-uments.
R106.5 Retention of construction documents. One set ofapproved construction documents shall be retained by thebuilding official for a period of not less than that dictated byOAR 166-150-0020 where a county has jurisdiction; OAR166-200-0025 where a city has jurisdiction; and OAR 166-300et al., for the jurisdictions where the State of Oregon has juris-diction. One set of approved plans and specifications shall bereturned to the applicant, and said set shall be kept on the site ofthe building or work at all times during which the work autho-rized thereby is in progress. The building official shall maintaina permanent record of all permits issued in flood hazard areas,including copies of inspection reports and certificationsrequired in Section R109.1.3.
SECTION R107TEMPORARY STRUCTURES AND USES
R107.1 General. The building official is authorized to issue apermit for temporary structures and temporary uses. Such per-mits shall be limited as to time of service, but shall not be per-mitted for more than 180 days. The building official isauthorized to grant extensions for demonstrated cause.
R107.2 Conformance. Temporary structures and uses shallconform to the structural strength, fire safety, means of egress,light, ventilation and sanitary requirements of this code as nec-essary to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare.
R107.3 Temporary power. Refer to applicable electrical laws.
R107.4 Termination of approval. The building official is autho-rized to terminate such permit for a temporary structure or use andto order the temporary structure or use to be discontinued.
SECTION R108FEES
R108.1 Payment of fees. A permit shall not be valid until thefees prescribed by law have been paid. Nor shall an amendmentto a permit be released until the additional fee, if any, has beenpaid.
R108.2 Schedule of permit fees. Permit and plan review feesshall be as adopted by the authority having jurisdiction, exceptas otherwise limited by statute. On buildings, structures,mechanical systems or alterations requiring a permit, a fee foreach permit shall be paid as required, in accordance with the
2014 OREGON RESIDENTIAL SPECIALTY CODE 1-9
SCOPE AND ADMINISTRATION
>
>
State of Oregon Board memo
Building Codes Division January 11, 2017
To: Residential and Manufactured Structures Board
From: Richard Baumann, policy analyst, Policy and Technical Services
Subject: Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements - Earth Advantage
Action requested: Board review and discussion of the “Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements”
provided by Earth Advantage.
Background: The Residential Specialty Code Committee (committee) is currently in the process of reviewing
a new base model code, existing Oregon amendments, and public proposals for the next edition
of the Oregon Residential Specialty Code (ORSC). The code review process began on August 1,
2016 when a 45-day notice was posted for the public to submit code amendments to the ORSC.
The comment period ended on September 14, 2016. The first committee meeting was in
November 2016, and they are scheduled to meet again in January 2017.
During the 45-day period to receive code proposals, there were five code change proposals
received that were energy-related as found in ORSC Chapter 11. The code committee also
received four additional documents supporting these energy related proposals.
In December 2016, the division received a copy of a document entitled “Cost Analysis of
Potential Energy Code Improvements” (dated December 2, 2016), prepared by Earth Advantage.
This document makes general energy-related code recommendations and cost analyses.
Discussion:
Because the board must make a finding regarding cost when it recommends approval of a
particular code or administrative rule, the board may choose to use the information contained
within this document to address cost issues for energy-related code proposals. Before taking
action on proposed code changes, the public is invited to provide information to the board in
person or in writing as part of the code review process. The division will then summarize any
public comments received for the board and its code review committee.
Agenda
Item
VII.B.
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements
December 2, 2016 Prepared by Earth Advantage
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 1
Executive Summary Oregon is considering developing a pathway for zero energy construction: buildings that produce as much energy as they consume. Washington and California have already established zero energy code pathways; these pathways are increasing energy efficiency, reducing climate pollution , and saving home and building owners and renters money. Questions have been raised in Oregon about how to achieve a similar pathway and what the impacts are on capital costs and energy efficiency.
A zero energy code pathway involves decreasing energy use in new buildings and homes in Oregon by 65 percent in three-year incremental stages over the next 15 years. To achieve such a trajectory, building codes wou ld be updated regularly over the course of the 15-year period , achieving incremental reductions in energy use in new buildings and homes. The first two steps would be to improve building standards by about 10 percent, and then another 10 percent -presumed to occur over the course of 6 years. The methods and technology to achieve 20 percent savings are already well known in Oregon. Within Energy Trust territory about 40 percent of new homes were built above code in the past year and they averaged 20 percent savings above code. To examine these possible initial steps, this report assesses the incremental cost of constructing residential dwellings - both individual homes and multi-family buildings - to energy performance levels that exceed current Oregon code by 10 and the
combined 20 percent.
While it is evident that significantly increasing energy efficiency in new homes and buildings would save Oregonians millions of dollars over time, the first costs incurred by the bu ilder or developer to build a more efficient home or bu ilding are more uncertain. Th.is analysis considers the potential up front cost impact improved energy codes would have on builders and developers. The cost information contained in this analysis represents close to a worst-case scenario (highest potential capita l cost impacts) for a real-world builder. The project team took an exceptionally conservative approach in carrying out th is assessment. The determination of construction costs for this analysis does not include:
• Preferred sub-contractor pricing, bulk pricing , or effective negotiation by a builder's purchasing agent. Cost savings accruing to the builder or developer based on optimized design that reduces mechanical system sizing or labor installation costs. Energy efficiency incentive funding for producing a higher performing home or building .
Any expected incremental cost reductions between baseline and more energy efficient products that are likely to occur over time.
The analysis resulted in the fo llowing findings:
• Through energy modeling and cost estimating , the project team determined that incremental first year capital costs of more efficient construction practices ranged from a cost-neutral impact to a 4.1 percent increase when compared to current code, depending on the building type, location, and levels of energy performance.
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 2
When analyzed using a financial model, any initial increase in the cost of construction required to achieve the higher levels of energy performance are repaid by utility savings in less than 1 year to up to 7 years of occupancy, depending on building type, location, and energy performance level.
• When utility costs are considered alongside financed construction costs over the life of the building, the analysis shows that building with improved energy efficiency standards costs 1.5% to 6.5% less than bui ld ing under the current energy code.
West side residential home East side residential home Energy efficiency 10% 20% 10% 20% increase Capital cost increase 0.2% 1.7% 0.5% 1.7% vs. current code Cost recovery period 1 year 7 years 2 years 5 years Decrease in total costs 1.5% 2.2% 1.6% 3.0% vs. current code (over life of building)
West side multifamily East side multifamily building building
Energy efficiency 10% 20% 10% 20% increase Capital cost increase 1.2% 4.1%' 1.2% 4.1% vs. current code Cost recovery period 2 years 4 years 2 years 4 years Decrease in total costs 6.0% 6.5% 6.0% 6.5% vs. current code (over life of buildinq)
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 3
Analysis Details The analysis considers prototypical single-family home and multifamily buildings in both Hillsboro and Bend, in order to consider climate and geographical variations. The analytical process included first conducting an energy model of the prototype buildings. Various building components and technologies were input into the energy model to create scenarios in which the home or building achieved the desired performance levels. Those components and technologies were then catalogued in order for the project team to conduct research into common pricing. To ensure a balanced and transparent approach, the analysis uses publicly available retail pricing information. Additionally, some cost information was supplemented by information from Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance (NEEA) cost research. The cost information used in the analysis does not take into account such factors as bulk pricing savings or labor cost savings that are often achieved by builders familiar with high performance construction techniques and approaches. This cost analysis also does not factor in energy efficiency incentive programs that can reduce the overall cost of certain energy efficiency components. Therefore, the project team believes the cost information used for this analysis represents close to a worst-case scenario (e.g. the highest potential capital cost impacts) for a real-world builder.
Building Type Overview The report analyzes cost and savings for specific building designs for single family and multifamily projects. One design is used for all single family analysis and another is used for the multifamily work. The designs are actual examples recently built in Oregon. These prototype
structures are: • Single Family - In order to simulate typical single family housing activity, a 2,200 square
foot, 3-bedroom home design was selected that the researchers have seen constructed on a regular basis in the Portland suburbs in the past two years. This two-story home has common design features such as an attached garage and an open living plan on the main floor. The home was modeled in both Hillsboro and Bend in order to determine if different energy efficiency measures were required to attain the same level of savings.
• Multifamily - A 44 unit, 26,088 square foot multifamily project was modeled for this project. The unit was chosen for its rep resentative design. It is a low-rise building with wa lk-up entrances and no indoor common areas. The multifamily project was modeled in both Hillsboro and Bend, but the measures required to attain the varying levels of efficiency did not vary between the two locations.
• Heating Fuel Mix - When natural gas is available single family homes typically have gas heat. For this reason we modeled homes with gas heat, and gas water heating, at the 10 percent and 20 percent savings levels. In some parts of the state natural gas is unavailable and for that reason the research team also modeled the all-electric systems for homes at the 10 percent and 20 percent savings levels. New multifamily construction in Oregon typically uses electricity for heating and water heating. The utilization of gas water heating is a measure that is cost effective to employ when targeting mid-range savings. The 10 percent savings building was modeled with all electric systems and the 20 percent savings building was modeled with gas water heat and electric heat.
Cost Ana lysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 4
Energy Consumption Analysis Approach: There are a variety of energy efficiency measures that could be employed to ach ieve greater than 10 percent savings in residential buildings in Oregon. We selected measures to include in this analysis based on what is commonly seen in homes that are seeking above code certification . The project team consults on a wider array of single and multifamily bui lding projects across Oregon. The team has experience with large volume builders and custom home builders. The measures selected for this analysis to attain the 10 percent and 20 percent savings levels are those that are widely adopted by the volume contractors in the construction industry.
• REMRate modeling - The energy savings was estimated using the industry standard energy modeling software REM/Rate v15.2. This software tool analyzes the building's shell , HVAC systems, water heating , and lighting fixtures . REM/Rate bases its estimate of annual fuel usage on the efficiency of the building systems and uses standard assumptions of plug loads, hot water usage, thermostat settings, plus local weather data. The team member that conducted the modeling is an industry expert who conducts over 1,000 energy models annually and followed local protocols that have been developed to ensure accuracy in estimating energy savings.
• Energy Efficiency and Solar - In addition to considering the energy savings that is available from efficiency measures, we also considered the use of Solar Photovoltaic Panels (PV) as an additional measure. Currently Oregon energy code allows PV to be utilized to achieve code requirements . Since achieving the 10 percent and 20 percent savings levels are regularly achieved by builders without the use of PV, this option was not used in modeling those homes.
Single Family Energy Savings Measures Fourteen different types of energy savings measures were analyzed for the purposes of this study. Within each measure type there were varying levels of efficiency modeled, for the team modeled savings for 4 different levels, 3 levels of attic insulation and two levels of wall insulation. The table below indicates what types of measures were included for single family homes to reach the different levels of energy savings.
Table 1: Single Family Measures
Measure Type 10% Savings 20% Savings
Water Heater Yes Yes
Heating Equip Yes Yes
Heating Distribution Yes Yes
Air Tightness Yes Yes
Heat Recovery Venti lation - -
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 5
Floor/Slab Insulation - -
Wall Insulation - Yes
Roof/Attic Insulation In Bend Only Yes
Plumbing Fixtures - -
Windows - Yes
Entry Doors Yes Yes
Hot Water Pipe Insulation - -
Lighting Yes Yes
Solar PV System - -
Multifamily Energy Savings Measures The same types of measures that were analyzed for single family homes were also analyzed for the multifamily building in this study. The specific measures are sometimes different for the multifamily building, for instance Package Terminal Heat Pumps were modeled for the multifami ly building, but not the single family building. Because the multifamily building is a walkup building the team decided to model only unitary equipment. That means no central heating , ventilation, or water heating systems were analyzed even though those systems are typically very durable and may offer significant savings potential over unitary systems, especially if they are analyzed for lifecycle cost savings. Unitary systems are lower cost to install and the team decided the inclusion of those systems would represent the more conservative approach for this study.
Table 2: Multifamily Measures
Measure Type 10% Savings 20% Savings
Water Heater Yes Yes
Heating Equip Yes Yes
Heating Distribution - Yes
Air Tightness Yes Yes
Heat Recovery Ventilation - -
Floor/Slab Insulation - Yes
Wall Insulation Yes Yes
Roof/Attic Insulation Yes Yes
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 6
Plumbing Fixtures - Yes
Windows Yes Yes
Entry Doors - -
Hot Water Pipe Insulation - Yes
Lighting Yes Yes
Solar PV System - -
Estimating Measure First Costs The baseline code buildings were estimated to cost $120 per square feet. This pricing was utilized for both sing le family and multifamily construction. Construction costs will vary depending on the quality of finish materials utilized and due to the availability of materials and labor. Costs can also differ significantly between multifamily and single family construction . The $120 per square foot cost was established as a level that is reasonable to consider for the size of buildings being considered and the types of finishes typical of housing for moderate income households. For example the window costs estimates are based on vinyl windows rather than on more expensive wood or fiberglass options. Additionally the home's two entry doors are assumed to be fiberg lass with Y.i lites with double pane insulated glass.
Construction costs were held constant between Hillsboro and Bend. There may be differences between the two markets , but since most material suppliers have distribution capacity in both markets and construction practices are largely the same, the research team decided that the one price was representative.
Cost information for the efficiency measures modeled at the 10 percent and 20 percent buildings was readily available because the technologies and methods are used regularly by builders in Oregon today. With in Energy Trust of Oregon territory about 40 percent of new homes participate in their new homes program and the average savings over code is 20 percent. That represents over 3,000 homes built in the past year at this level of performance. NEEA has compiled cost data for the typical measures utilized to achieve that level of performance. This study uses that cost information from N EEA in addition to current pricing for equipment that was researched on internet retail sites. This equipment pricing does not reflect any contractor discounts and the team views this as a conservative cost approach .
Estimating Lifecycle Costs A life cycle cost analysis was also conducted to offer a view of cost beyond merely first cost. Life cycle cost analysis is a decision-making tool that compares the owning and operating costs for energy using systems: heating , cooling , lighting , bui lding envelope, and domestic hot water. The analysis accounts for the in itial cost of constructing a building, as well as the cost of owning
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 7
and operating a facility over its useful life. These costs make up the total cost of ownership for a building. In addition to determining the first cost of constructing 10 percent and 20 percent above current code buildings, a lifecycle cost analysis was conducted using the Lifecycle Cost Ana lysis Tool, Version: 2016-A from the Office of Financial Management (OFM) in Washington state. This tool was based on a federal tool and was developed by OFM to plan state capital expenditures, but has also been adopted in Washington to analyze all energy code proposals and some affordable housing funding applications.
For this analysis, the replacement cost of measures was factored into the lifecycle cost analysis. Equipment, plumbing and light fixtures , solar panels were all estimated to have useful lives well short of 50 years. The length of a measu re's useful life was held constant across various efficiency levels. In that way the lifecycle costs were not influenced by subjective determinations of how long a measure will last, but each measure type was treated the same. The replacement cost intervals for measures can be seen in the Cumulative Expenditure Report that is a part of each LCCT report in the Appendices.
Analysis Results Table 3 below details the incremental increases in construction costs (first costs) required to achieve the above code levels of performance for the 2,200 square foot single family home. Incremental costs to achieve 10 percent savings in gas heated homes varied from 0.2 percent in Hillsboro to 0.5 percent in Bend. Although not shared in Table 3, the costs to achieve 10 percent savings for electric heat were estimated and totaled increased costs over code of 0.8 percent and 1.1 percent. The incremental costs for the 20 percent saving in gas heated homes were 1. 7 percent for both from Hillsboro and Bend. The costs for 20 percent savings with electric heat were 2.2 percent in Hillsboro and 2.3 percent in Bend.
Table 3: Single Family Measure Capital Costs (First Costs)
Measure Type 10% Hillsboro 10% Bend 20% Hillsboro 20% Bend Gas Heat Gas Heat Gas Heat Gas Heat
Water Heater $42 $42 $369 $369
Heating Equip $180 $180 $237 $237
Heating $296 $296 $296 $296 Distribution
Air Tightness $75 $75 $75 $75
Heat Recovery - - - -Ventilation
Floor/Slab - - $1 ,485 $1,485 Insulation
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 8
Wall Insulation - - $946 $946
Roof/Attic - $715 $715 $715 Insulation
Plumbing - - - -Fixtures
Windows - - $400 $400
Entry Doors $40 $40 $40 $40
Hot Water Pipe - - - -Insulation
Lighting $0 $0 $0 $0
Solar PV - - - -System
Total Capital $633 $1,348 $4,563 $4,563 Cost Premium
Premium% 0.2% 0.5% 1.7% 1.7%
Note : The lighting upgrades were listed with a $0 cost due to two factors. Proiect teams have reported that they are able to fi nd effic ient fixtures and bulbs for no additional cost. The other factor is that the overall market is widely expected to move to LED bulbs in the near future.
Table 4 below details the incremental increases in construction costs (first costs) required to achieve the above code levels of performance for the 44 unit, 26,088 square foot low-rise multifamily project.
Table 4: Multifamily Measure Capital Cost per Unit (First Cost)
Measure Type 10% 20%
Water Heater 0$ $1 ,284
Heat ing Equip $40 -
Heating Distribution - -
Air Tightness $75 $75
Heat Recovery Venti lation - -
Floor/Slab Insulation - $451
Wall Insulation $254 $254
Roof/Attic Insulation $409 $409
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 9
Plumbing Fixtures - $61
Windows $100 $200
Entry Doors - -
Hot Water Pipe Insu lation - $168
Lighting $0 $0
Solar PV System - -
Total Capital Cost Premium $878 $2,902
Premium% 1.2% 4.1%
Financial Analysis This analysis examines the finan cia l impact of the proposed savings at a first year level and with a fifty-year lifecycle cost approach. Both approaches are based on the consideration of capital costs interest paid back through long term financing and the lowered operating costs that come with increased efficiency. The sing le family financing assumes a standard 30-year mortgage with a 4 percent interest rate. The multifamily financing assumes a 20-year mortgage with a 4 percent interest rate.
Five different building types were modeled for each climate location. The lowest cost home for in Bend and Hillsboro from a lifecycle perspective was the 20 percent more efficient gas home.
Table 6. Total 50 Year Costs for 2,200 Sq Ft Home (Lifecycle Cost)
Bend Hillsboro
Code Baseline (Gas/Elec) $528,812/$530,420 $515,037/$513,97 4
10% Savings with Gas Heat $520,355 $507,463
10 %Savings with Elec Heat $529,494 $513,156
20% Savings with Gas Heat $513,379 $503,753
20% Savings with Elec Heat $523 ,900 $509, 100
For all savings scenarios the fi rst year expenses are lower than the baseline code home. For instance the first year expenditures for the 20 percent savings home in Hi llsboro are $125 less than the baseline and in year 7 of occupancy the cumulative savings over baseline becomes positive and remains so for the rest of the building's estimated life.
Cost Ana lysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 10
The numbers of years of occupancy required before the cumulative expenses of the savings scenarios overcome the initial capital expense varies between 1 and 7 years. For the 10% savings level these time periods are:
2 years for the cumulative expenses of a multifamily building to become less than those of a code building in either Oregon climate location.
• 2 years for the cumulative expenses of a gas heated single family home in Bend to become less than those of a code built home.
1 years for the cumulative expenses of a gas heated single family home in Hillsboro to become less than those of a code built home.
For the 20% savings level these time periods are:
4 years for the cumulative expenses of a multifamily building to become less than those of a code building in either Oregon climate location.
5 years for the cumulative expenses of a gas heated single family home in Bend to become less than those of a code built home.
7 years for the cumulative expenses of a gas heated single family home in Hillsboro to become less than those of a code built home.
Both the 10 percent and 20 percent better than code homes are better investments than the baseline code home, but the 20 percent savings homes are better long-term investments. This understanding provides a good motivation to move state building standards for single family homes towards higher levels of energy performance as quickly as is feasible for the build ing community to adopt the required methods.
The multifamily building built to 10 percent and 20 percent savings level show lower first costs and lifecycle costs than the baseline code building. The lower incremental costs associated with these levels of performance means that project owners will recover the initial incremental investment much fa ster. The 10 percent building fully recovers the additional capital costs in the second year of occupancy. The 20 percent building recovers the additional capital costs in the fourth year of occupancy. The net present savings for the 10 percent building are $410,887. The net present savings for the 10 percent building are $436,341 .
The lifecycle savings potential indicated for these higher energy performing buildings supports policies that promote buildings that are capable of supplying even higher level of savings than the 20 percent documented in this analysis. The savings provided by the 10 percent and 20 percent buildings comes with very little risk. Both building levels pay back the initial capital expense of energy efficiency measures within four years. This rapid repayment schedule should make policy makers secure in setting these leve ls of energy performance for multifamily construction projects as standard practice in the very near term.
Study Conclusions The first year and lifecycle cost savings represented by the 10 percent and 20 percent savings levels are significant and they should be adopted into code as quickly as possible. The initial costs of construction required to achieve these levels of performance are minimal - if not cost
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 11
neutral - and are quickly repaid by the utility savings. These levels of energy performance require between 1 to 7 years when using the most cost effective heating fuel for a given location and bui lding type. The 20 percent savings leve l is the average that Energy Trust of Oregon sees with participating new homes and it utilizes methods that are very common across Oregon. This building type fully recovers upfront costs with in four years of operation. That is a very secure provision of benefit to Oregon building owners and occupants.
Interestingly, the lifecycle savings potential for very high energy performing multifamily buildings could be sign ificantly greater than baseline current code options. While this analysis focused on the short-term cost impact of making 10 percent and 20 percent code improvements, market evidence of a few recent projects completed in Oregon suggest that multifamily construction that achieves very high energy performance improvement levels has an even lower overall cost in the first year of operation and over a 50-year lifecycle. One of these examples is Phase Two of Orchards at Orenco Station in Hillsboro, with Walsh Construction as the contractor and REACH CDC as the developer. This project was designed to deliver over 50% energy improvement and was completed for only a 5% incremental cost in 2016. The project team achieved the savings at this price as the resu lt of discipline to design and build with energy efficiency as a priority . Another high performance project completed in 2016 is the Iron Horse Lodge in Prinevi lle , built by Pacific Crest Affordable Housing, which delivered a 75% energy improvement through a mix of efficiency and solar. This project will achieve close to zero energy usage, meaning that over the course of a year it will consume almost the same amount of energy as is produced on site. The full cost recovery of all of the energy investments will occur in 10 years. At the same time, the greatly reduced operating expenses that accrue on day 1 of occupancy help the building owner keep rents lower and ensures that month utility costs can be affordable for these lowincome seniors on a fixed income.
Any first cost premiums for higher levels of energy performance should decrease over time as contractors become more familiar with the construction of efficient building assemblies, products become more widely available and heat pump technolog ies increase efficiency. As an example, the installed cost of solar PV has dropped more than 50% in the past 10 years and is likely to continue dropping in cost. Yet, even with first cost premiums, these project produce a lower overall cost in the first year of operation and over a 50-year lifecycle when compared to less efficient buildings, including current code buildings. Indeed, a multifamily building with 65% better energy performance than current code (equivalent to being "zero energy ready") is an estimated 11 .2% less expensive to build and operate over time than a code building.
While the practices needed to achieve 20 percent energy improvement are commonplace and easily integrated into standard building practices today, a greater number of contractors must become familiar with the advanced building practices required to achieve levels such as 65 percent before they can become standard practice (i.e. code). Nonetheless, the spread of those techniques and the achievement of that leve l of energy performance should be reasonably achieved over the next 15 years .
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 12
Appendices Appendix A: Incremental Costs Appendix B-1 : LCCT Executive Report for Multifamily 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix B-2: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Hillsboro Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix B-3: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Hillsboro Elec Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix B-4: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Bend Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix B-5: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Bend Elec Heat Single Fami ly 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix C-1 : LCCT Expenditure Report for Multifamily 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix C-2: LCCT Expenditure Report for Hillsboro Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings Appendix C-3: LCCT Expenditure Report for Bend Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 13
Appendix A: Incremental Cost Sources
Sir9le Family Costs M ultifami'y Ccs1i; 220:'.l .sq ft 593 .sq ft
SF SF SF 1ilF 111F unit WF Code :iric;es lm<O)r.a'l'ed pr.zes Premiu.11 Code :irice lm.::iro'l'ed ~ Premiui'lil
Total Premium Pe.·::ent Premiurri .63 Gas '.'VH-.50 gal ~ ~ S42.00 so.co .67 Gas WH-50 gal SS.::6.DJ 5Si S.o: $36'9.00 so .co .00 Gas WH-50 gal S:..Jo.oc ?-. 79:•.:I) $1,2.84.00 ;:.:6 I): :;_, 190 ~o Sl.2.84.00 .!Kl EF E ec \ll/H-5CI Qctl 5585.00 S585.00 SO .GO $0 .00 .&2 EF E er:; WH-50 gal $585.0C• S5e5.00 $0 .C{• $0 .DO .95 EF E ec WH-5CI gal S585.0C· $5B5.00 so.co so.co .00 ~F E ec; WH-50 gal $585.00 $585.00 so .co $0.CO HPWH 3.25 COP S576.oo ;woo: S42i> OC· $57-3.00 $D9-:J S42::l.OO 92 AFUE fur.1ac:e 5S3S OC )7'55.(): S18:l.OO $0.00 95 AFUE furiace $53!'..0C ;s2~.o: 5237 00 $0.CO S.5 HSPF duct~d HP S1 .ra.oo s1.ro.oo $0.00 9.:J HSPF dueled HP 52.220.00 52,li:O 00 sa.ao PTHP 9.0 HSPF,'1~EER so.co $560.00 S70:J ~0.00 DHP 11 HSPF s:m:::i.oc· 51 ,270.00 $97\LOO $20J.OO 51 .270 S1,070.00 DHP 12.5 HSPF S300.0C· S1 .820 .00 $1 ,520.00 S20:J.OC• 51.8-20 $1,620.00 5'1': duct ealo(age .5295.00 $296.00 $0.CO Duels ir..s·de so.co $0.cCi 6ACH $75 s1s:oo $75 S75.00 5ACH S75 575.00 575 $75.CiO JACH swo $15J .OO S15J S1so.00 .051'/CH-Pas.sive House so.co S1.472 $1 .471.68 HRV 90% S2 .ooo.oo S2..C-OO.OO so.cc. HRV 90% SJ.C-00 00 S3 ,COO .OO so.co 2 gpcr H2.0 fod <..1res $183 16 S1B3.15 S6i se~ .o5 50% CFL $0.C<I so.co 90% CFL SO.C-0 $0 .DO 100% CFL so .co so.co 100% LEDs SO.ClCt so.co DHY'I :>ipe ·nsu aliori 5185 00 $185.00 S112 S112 .G6 250:J W PV syst.gm S7 ,S75.00 S7,8.75.00 SO .DO 265:J W PV syi;tem SB.347.50 SB.l47.50 SO.DO B<.000 'N PV systeT SO .DO $0 .00 950!)0 'N PV systel'"' SO .C·O SG,085.23 R30 Floors S0 .00 so.co R38 Fie.or:; S1 .485· oo $1,485.00 $0 .00 R15P Sla':l SO .CCI 5451 .$451 07 R15U Slab so.co $702 $701 .75 R23 Wa;fs 5046.00 S!J4tLOG 5254 $253.50 R44'Na.'s Sll.226.00 SC,226 .. 00 S2.roo $2 ,700.12 R38 Ce- ling-14 °"eel S759.00 S759.00 $409 S<.09.11 R4!J CE!'ling-7 ree. $7'5 00 s1 ·s.oo $385 $JB5.3G R60 Ce' lin9-7 ree SB25.00 .$825 .. 00 SB77 $877.19 U .30 •/f.ndows $400 00 ,S.:.00.00 $100 S10:J.OO U .2B w ndows S68B.OO $6BB.OC S200 $200.00 U 20 w;·ndows 51.400.00 S1.400.00 $3,092. S3 .C'91 .53 R5 :foors ~0.00 ~0.00 so.co
Base ccnstrucrion cost 5120.0C· PB' sf li/odeled 1,1F Avg Uni t Sq FT 503 Sq Ft ..... 1.'odeled \1F avg Roctrur it 19B sq ff
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 14
Appendix B-1 : LCCT Executive Report for Multifamily 10 percent and 20 percent Savings
Office of Financial Management Olympia, Washington· Version: 2016-A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Executive Report
Project Information Proiect: Address: Companv: Contact Contact Phone: Contact Email:
OR Affordab'e Housing Pro;ecc 10% and 20°~ Savings
Key Analysis Variables Building Characteristics
S9.COO,OOO
18.000,000
S7,COO,OOO
so.coo.mo s.s.000.000 $4000,000
Sl.000.000
S>.000.000
Sl.000 ,000
\.
Study Period (ye;u-s) 52 GroujSQ.Ftl 26.088 Nomilul Discount Ratt ).46K Useabtl (Sq.HI 16.088 Mainterwnce hcal•tlon 1.()0% Sp.ice Effidencv 100.0%
Zero YHr !Current Year) 2017 ProiKt Pha.se 0 Construction Yeari 2 Bu~dlnc Type 0
life Cycle Cost Analysis }I ~. T Alternative 8ueline Alt.1 AH. 2 EnerftV Use lntenstitv (kBtu/sq. ~) 39.5 35.7 33.6
H t Construction Costs s 3.115.269 s l.151.962 s 3,238,92<
PV of Qp1tal Cosu s 4,004,24S s 4,034,676 s 4,230.197
PV of Mainten.ince Costs s s s PV of Utility Costs s l.216.109 s 2,774,522 s 2,552,911
Tollll llf11: Cycle Con (LCC) s 7,220,35' $ 6,809,198 s 6,713,101
Net Prtsmt S.ivln,p (NPS) N/A $ 411,lSS $ 437,2'6
Societal LCC t akes into consideration the sod.ii C.Ol( or urbon dio•idc cminlons uwld by opcrJtion.il t mmrv consumption
(GHG) Social life Cycle Cost GHG lmpirt from Uhlity Consump1ion
Tons of C02e over Study Period " C02e fl.eduction V\. &Heline
Present Social r.cnt of t.irbon {SCCJ
Total LCC with SCC NPS with SCC
Societal Life Cycle Cost
.. I .. _I I !u~llo'U!
• PVofC11:11to1I
•?'II ofUhli"bes
Alt.l All.2
•PVof SCC
1tC')
&Heline All. 1 Alt 2
6,472 S.849 4,665 .,. 10% 31%
s 580.386 s 524,979 s 418,6"7
s 7,801,240 $ 7,334,177 $ 7,201,795
N/A s 467,062 s S99,44S
Cumulative Expenditure Report (No-SCC) $10,000,DOO
59,000,000
sa.000.000
S7.000.000 -
S6.000.000
SS.000.DOD
54,000,000
n.000.000
$2,000,000
Sl ,000,000
S·
Baseline Short Description Affordable Multifamily with cost of S120/sf
Alternative l Short Description 10% bttttr thi n code. l .Z"' cost orcmium
Alternative 2 Short Description 20% betttr thin code, 4.1% con orcmium
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 15
Appendix B-2: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Hillsboro Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20
percent Savings
Office of Financial Management Olympia, Washington . Version: 2016-A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Executive Report
Project Information Proiect: OR 2,200 SF Home Gas Heat: 10% and 20% Savings Address: 123 St, Hillsboro,
Comoanv: Contact Contact Phone; Contact Email:
Key Analysis Variables Buildln1 Characteristics Study Period (year5J 51 Gross (Sq.Ft) 2,200
Nom!ncil Discount Rate 3.46% USC'ab1e(Sq.ft) 2, 200
Maintenance Escalation 1 .om~ Space Efficienrv 100.01'
Zero Yu r (Curren! Ye.111 2017 Project Phase Construction Years BuildinP,. Type
Life Cycle Cost Analysis ]f'.:>! Alterniltive: Baseline Alt. l Alt. 2
Encrr.v Use lntenstitv {kBtu/sQ.~J ao.o l6.0 ll.3
1st Construction Carts s 262,841 $ 263.472 s PV of Upitill Costs s 384,499 s l 86,12S s PY of M aintenance Costs s s s PV of Utnitv Costs s 130,538 s 121,339 s Ta u l lit• Cycle Cost (LCC) s s1s.o:n s 507,463 s Net Present Siivlni;s (NPS) N/ A s 7,574 s
267,384
390.291
lll.462
503,751 11,284
Societal \.CC takes into cons1dcrat1on t he scc1;al cost of carbon d10.io:le t.!ml•sions Cilu scd by operattona l cncrr,y con~ump~lon
l!GHG) Social Life Cvcle Cost .!~ST
GHG Impact from Utllitv Consvm tion Baseline Alt. l Alt.2
Tons of C02e over Study Period 338 296 262 } j C02e Reduction vs. Baseline N/A 12% 25,1
p,e.sent Social Con of Ci1rbon (SCQ s 30,J.9.l s 26.464 s 23,479
TaQI LCC with sec $ 545.231 s 533,928 $ S27,Zl 2
NPS w ith sec N/A s 11,304 s 17,999
Societal Life Cycle Cost Cumulative Expenditure Report (No-SCC) S600.000
S>oo.ooo
S400,000
Sl00,000
S200.000
$100,000
s.
~ Pllof Ci1p1t;,!
e PVol Ut1Lhu
5700,000
5600,000
5SCO,OOO
5400,000 - ·
Sl00,000
5200,000
SlC0.000
.\It. l Alt 2 S·
• PVo!SCC
Baseline Short Description SinP.le Familv Construction with cost of Sl20/sf
Alte rnat ive 1 Short Descript ion lOK better than code with Gas Heat, 0.2% cost premium
Alte rnative 2 Short Description 2DK better than code with Gas Heat , 1.7" co~t premium
Cost Analys is of Potenti al Energy Code Improvements 16
Appendix B-3: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Hillsboro Elec Heat Single Fami ly 10 percent and 20 percent Savings
Office of Financial Management Olympia, Washington -Version: 2016-A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Executive Report
Project Information Pmiect OR 2,200 SF Home: 10% and 20~• Savings Address: 123 S~ Hiiisboro. Comnanv: Coo tact: Contact Phone: Contact Email:
K•v An•lvsis Varl•bles Buildina Characteristics Study Period (yeilr\) Sl Gross (SQ.ft) 2,ZOO Nomi~I Discount Rilte 3.46% UsHble (Sq.Ft• 2.,100 Malnt~ruince Escalation 1.00% Since Effic;i("flcy 100J)% Zer o Yeir {Current Yt'irl 2017 Protect Ph.a~ 0
Construction Yeilr5 l Buddll'l.I: Tvpe 0
life Cytl• Cost Analysis '.U'.i l Ahernatlve Bisellric Alt. l Alt.2
Ener~ Use lntenltitv lkBtu/sn.ftl 26.S 24 .0 21.5 ht Ccmtruction Cosu s 262.841 s 264,953 s PV of Capit al Costs s 384,499 s 390,732 s PV of M;,intenancc Costs s s s PV of Utility Costs s 129.415 s 122,424 s Totll Ufe Cv c:lt Cost fLCC1 s 51J,974 s Sll,1S6 s Net Pr•Hnl Si.vln1s (NPS) N/A s 111 s
268,484
393 710
115,391
509,100
4,174 Societal LCC ta kes Into considerat ion tl\t social cost of c.arbon d1ox1de am1ss10ns a used by ope~tlona l energy con~omp1lon
ilGHGl Social Lit• Cvcl• Cost l!:)~
GHG lmpa.ct from Utilitil Consumption Sasellne Alt. l AJt. 2 Tons of C02e over Study Period 351 325 292 "C02e Reduction VJ.. Baselin~ N/A 9" 2°" Pruent Soci.al Cost of Carbon (SCC) s 32.045 s 29.071 s 26.104
Tot.11 LCCwlt h sec s 546,020 s 54 2.227 s SlS,10< NPS w it h sec N/ A s J,793 s 10..115
Societal Life Cycle Cost Cumulat ive Expenditure Report (No-SCC) S&00,000
S~0.000 a. $400,000
Sl00,000
5200,000
$100,000
•PVofUllC.t10
$700,000
1600.000
ssco.coo !400,000
Sl00,000
S200,000
SJ00,000
Alt.l All.2 S·
•f'llofSCC
Bas•line Short Ducrlptlon Sinll!I• hm1tv Construction with con of 5120/rl
Altem•tiv• 1 Short Description 10~ be:ner than cod• w ith Eltc HHt, 0.81(. cost pte mium
Alt•matlw 2 Short Description 20" b•ner than codt w ith £lee ~.at-2.2K cos1 premium
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 17
Appendix 8-4: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Bend Gas Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent
Savings
Office of Financial Management Olympia, Washington -Version: 2016-A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Executive Report
Project Information Project: OR 2,200 SF Home: 10% and 20% Savings
Address: 123 Central Oregon St, Bend, Companv: Contact Contact Phone: Ccntact Email:
Key Analvsis Variables Building Characteristics Study Period (years) SI Gross(SQ.Ft) 2,200
Nomfnal Dbtount Rate 3.46% Usuble (Sq.ft) 2,200
Millntc nance Esc11lation l.00% Spilce lfficiency 100.:nl Zero Year (Current YearJ 2017 Project Phase o Construction Years l Buildln~ Type o
Life Cycle Cost Analysis 3t~.> l
Alternative Baseline Alt. 1 Alt. 2
Ene uv Use lntenstity (kBtu/sq.ftl 49.4 44.3 38.3
1st Construction Costs s 262,841 s 264,184 s PV of Cap ital Carts $ 384,499 s 3B6,65S s PV of Maintenance Costs s s s PV of Utility Costs s 144,312 s 133,700 s Total lire CVtle Cost fLCC) s 528,8l2 s 520,355 s Net Pru•nt SilvlnJS (NPS) N/ A $ l ,4S6 s
267,384
390,291
123,088
513,)79
lS,433
Soc1etal LCC takes into cons1de1.1t 1on the soclill cost of carbon d olllde tmlulon~ cou1st:d bv opc~t1onal tm<?rey co:uumpt1on
{GHG) Social Lif~ Cycle Cost 3t:':)f
GHG lmoact from Utility ConsumgtLon Baseline Alt . l Alt. 2
Tons of C02t' over St udy Period 394 346 301
% C02e Reduction vs. Baseline N/A 1211. 27%
Present Social Cost o f Carbon (SCC) s lS,218 s 30,978 s 26,904
Total LCC with SCC s S64,0l0 $ 551,3)1 $ 540,283
NPS w ith sec NI A s 12,697 s U ,7U
Societal Life Cycle Cost Cumulative Expenditure Report (No-SCC) SG00.000
SS00,000
l-><J0.000
Sl00,000
s200.ooo
SlOo,ooo
S-
... I ....... · _I S700.000
S&00,000
ssoc.coo
5400,000
Sl00,000
S200.000
SI00,000
-All. I All 2
S·
• PVol ~p1!;1I
• PVof U1!11tics • PV ol sec
Baseline Short Description Sin I' le famif'I Construction with cost of S UO/sf
Alternative 1 Sho rt Description 10% bette r tha n code wit h Gas Heat, 0.5" cost prl!'mium
Alternative 2 Short Description 20% better ::han code w ith Gas Heat, 1.7% cost prnmiu m
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 18
Appendix B-5: LCCT Exec. Rep. for Bend Elec Heat Single Family 10 percent and 20 percent Savings
Office of Financial Management Olymp ia, Washington -Version: 2016-A Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Executive Report
Project Informat ion Project OR 2,200 SF Home: t0% and 20% Savongs Address: 123 Central Oregon S~ Bend,
Comn::1nv: Contact Contact Phone: Contact Email:
Kev Analvsis Variables Suildlnc Charocterlstlts Study Period (years) SI Gross(SQ.ft) 2,200 Nomlnat Discount Rate l.46% Us<0bl< (Sq.ft) 2,200
Maintenance Esulation 1.0011 Spite (fficitncv 100.0ll Zero Yur (Current Year) 2017 Project Phase 0
Constn.ictlon Years I Buildinr. Tvpe 0
Life Cycle Cost Analysis J~~T Al le rn.itlve auellne A!t. l Alt.2
fnetl:Y UK> lnt~nnitv lkOtu/sQ.ftl 12.2 29.5 26.2
1st Construction Com s 262.841 s 265,665 s PV of Cipital Costs s 184.499 s 391.262 s PV of Maintenance Cosu s s s PV of Utility Costs s 145,920 s ll8,2l2 s Tot•! Ufe Clc141 Coit lLCC) s SJ0,420 s 529,494 s Net Prennt SiitVln11s fNPS) N/A $ 925 $
261.991 39S,289
128,611
523,900
6,520
Societal lCC tikes mto conslderiUon the scc J.11 c.ost of cubon d10.icide cmlu1ons a used by opcr.1t1an•l l!nt.!rr.v consumption
SG00,000
ssoo.ooo
5400.000
SJ00.000
S2-oo,ooo
Sl00.000
S·
llGHG) Social Life Cycle Cost .$!.'>! GHG lmP<Jct from Ut ility COn,.umptlon auclln• Alt. l Alt. 2 Tons of C02e over St ucfv Perfod 436 •oo 354 "COZt Reduction vs. 8.is•6ne N/A 8% 20" Present Soci.al Cost of Cirbon (SCCl s 18,982 s lS,739 s 31,681
Total lCC w ith SCC $ 569,402 s 565,234 s SSS.Sil NPS with sec N/ A s 4,168 $ ll,821
Societal Life Cycle Cost Cumulative Expenditure Report (No-SCC)
._l_··.:I · .I _ saoo.ooo SI00,000
1600.000
ssoo.ooo scoo.ooo ll00.000
Sl00,000
Sl00,000
------·-----·•••--•-•HO •<••-··--·---·
PVolOl)i(11I
• PVolUul;11es
Alt. 1 AIL 2 S·
•FYofSCC
Baseline Short De..:r iption Sin le hm1I Cons-tructlon with cost of Sl20/$f
Alternative 1 Short Description 10% better th•n code with EJec He•t. 1. 1" cost premium
Alternative 2 Short Description 20%bettu :h•ncode with Eau He•t, 2.l'K cost premium
Cost Analysis of Potential Energy Code Improvements 19
Mu
ltifa
mily
601
\dm
g h:
pend
iturc
s: A
A 1
i.s l
OK
, Alt
2 is
20%
Alte
moi
t.i"o
lel
Al1
Mno
i1lv
e2
Eap
end1
ture
C
umul
ativ
e Expenditure
~ bp
enc!
itu
rH
bp
endi
ture
R
eoor
t E1
D11n
dltu
1es
over
B.u
elm
l' ov
er Ba~
llne
R.f:
port
YH
r Ca
plla
l M
amte
f\in
ct
Ull
l!ll
H
Fina
ncm
c lO
till
AJl
. l
Ann
ual
Cumul1ti
~•
Ci p
ita I
M
•int
en•n
ce
2017
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
20
1B
S3
.16>
,B55
so
so
·S
2,53
2,6B
4 S
633,
171
S63
3,17
1 S7
,371
S
7,37
1 S
3,25
3,20
0 so
20
19
so
so
so
Sl7
3.43
9 S
173,
439
5806
,610
S2
,019
S
9,39
0 so
so
20
20
so
so
S61
9B
S S
168
225
S2
l0 2
11
SI
036
820
.57
934
S
l.45
6 so
so
20
21
so
so
S62
,248
$
163,
169
S22
S,4
16
Sl.
262,
237
·58.
021
-56,
565
so
so
2022
so
so
S
62,2
48
51SB
,264
S
220,
512
Sl,
482,
74B
-S
8,07
B
·Slt1
,f>43
so
so
20
23
so
so
S62
,24B
S
l53
506
S
215,
754
Sl,
69
B S
03
·S8.
133
-522
.776
so
so
20
24
so
so
S&l.9
B5
Sl4
8 8
92
S210
,B17
$1
909
380
-5
8,15
9 -S
30 9
36
so
so
2025
so
so
S
62,2
4B
5144
,416
52
06,6
64
S2,1
16.C
W.
SB,2
39
-$39
,17S
so
so
20
26
so
so
S
62,2
48
Sl4
0,07
S
S20
2.l2
3 S
2,31
8,36
7 ·S
B.2
90.
·$47
.465
so
so
20
27
so
so
S62
,248
S
l35
865
S
l98
,ll2
S
2,51
6.47
9 ·S
B 33
9 -S
55,8
03
so
so
202B
so
so
56
2 24
B
5131
7B
I S
l94.
028
52
710
508
·SB
38
6
-$64
.190
so
so
20
29
50
so
$6
1,98
5 S
l27,
819
Sl8
9,B
04
$2
,90
0,l
ll
-58.
404
-S
72,
S94
so
SD
20
30
$0
so
561,
9B5
$123
977
S
l8S
,962
5
3,0
86,2
74
-SB
,449
-5
81.0
43
so
so
20
31
so
so
$6
19
85
S
l20
2SO
$
18
21
35
S
3,26
8.51
0 -S
B.4
93
·589
536
so
so
20
32
so
so
S61
,985
51
16,6
36
5178
6ll
SJ
,447
,131
-5
8.53
5 -5
9a 0
11
so
so
2033
so
so
$
61,9
B5
$113
,130
S
l7S
,llS
S
3,62
2,24
5 -S
B,5
75
·Sl0
6,6
46
so
so
2034
S
88,0
00
so
$61,
98S
$1
09,7
29
S2S
9.7H
S
3,88
1,95
9 -5
8,61
S
·511
5,26
1 51
41,0
20
so 20
3S
so
so
$61,
985
Sl0
6 4
30
Sl6
8,41
6 S
4,0S
O,l
75
-58,
653
-Sl2
39
15
so
sO
2036
so
so
S
6l
985
$103
23
1 $1
65.2
16
S<,2
1s
S9
l -S
8 69
1 -S
l32,
60S
so
so
20
37
so
so
$6
2.2
48
S
I00,
128
5162
,376
$4
,371
,967
S
S,7
55
·$14
1,3
60
so
so
2038
so
so
$6
2,24
8 S
97 1
18
Sl5
9,36
6 S4
,537
,334
-$
8,79
0 ·S
IS0,
150
so
so
2039
57
62,0
00
so
$62.
510
so
5824
.S!O
SS
,361
,a.;
.:
59,9
48
·S16
0,09
8 57
64,6
86
$
0
1040
so
so
5
61
77
3
so
$62,
773
S5,
424
617
-59
976
·517
0,07
S
50
so
2041
so
so
S
62,7
73
so
S61
.773
S5
,"87
,390
5
9.9
76
·Sl8
0,0
Sl
so
so
1042
so
so
56
2 77
3 $0
S
6l,7
73
S5,
S50
,l63
·S
9,9
l6
Sl9
0 0
28
so
so
20
43
so
so
S62
77
l so
S
6l,
773
SS 6
12,9
36
59.9
76
·520
0 00
4 so
so
20
44
so
$0
S
62 7
73
so
S62
773
SS
,67S
,709
-S
9,97
6 ·S
l09,
980
so
so
204S
so
so
$6
2,77
3 so
S6
Z.7
13
SS
,738
,482
·S
9,97
6 -S
l19,
9S7
so
so
2046
so
so
S
6Z
.n3
$0
$6
2,71
3 SS
,80
l.2
S5
·59,
976
-S
l29
,933
so
so
20
47
so
so
$62,
773
so
S62,
773
S5,
864,
028
-S9,
976
·S23
9,90
9 so
so
20
48
so
so
S6
z.n
3
so
S62
773
SS
926
801
-5
9,97
6 -S
249.
lla6
so
so
20
49
S37
2,40
0 so
S
62,7
73
so
$435
,173
$6
,361
,974
-S
5,S
76
·525
5.46
2 S
429,
820
so
lOSO
so
so
S
62,7
7l
so
S62
773
$6
,424
,747
·S
9.97
6 -5
265,
439
so
so
2051
so
so
S
62
.n3
so
S
62,7
73
S6
487
520
·S9.
976
-S27
S.41
S so
so
20S
l so
so
S
62 7
73
so
S62
,773
S6
,SSO
293
$9
,976
·S
285,
391
so
so
2053
so
so
S
6l,
n3
so
$6
2,77
3 S6
,6ll
.066
-S
9,97
6 -S
29S,
368
so
so
2054
so
so
S
62,7
73
so
S6l
,773
S6
,675
,839
-5
9 9
76
-530
5.3<
4 so
so
lOS5
so
so
S
62 7
73
so
$62
773
S6
.73
8.6
ll
-S9,
976
·531
S,J
l0
so
so
20S
6 so
so
$6
2 7
73
so
S62
773
S
6.B
0138
5 ·S
9,97
6 -$
325
291
so
so
20
57
so
so
S6
2,n
3
so
S62
,773
S6
, 86
4,l
58
·$
9,97
6
-$33
5,27
3 so
so
2058
so
so
S
62,7
73
so
562,
773
$6,9
26,9
31
·S9,
976
·$34
5,24
9 so
so
20S
9 S
762,
000
so
562,
773
so
$82<
l,713
S7
751
,704
-S
9.97
6 ·S
35S
.226
S7
64 6
86
so
2060
so
so
S
62 7
73
so
S6
2.71
3 57
81
44
77
-5
9 9
76
-S36
S.20
2 so
so
206
1 so
so
S
62,7
73
so
$62,
713
57,8
77,2
SO
·S9,
976
·Sl7
5,l
l9
so
so
2062
so
so
$6
2,77
3 so
S
62,7
73
$7,9
40,0
23
·S9,
976
-$
385,
lS5
so
so
2063
so
so
S
62
.ni
so
$6
2.7
73
SB
002
,796
-S
9 9
76
-539
S ,1
31
so
so
2064
S8
B,O
OO
so
$6
2 77
J so
51
SO 7
73
SB 1
53 5
69
·S9
976
-S40
5 10
8 S
l4l,
02
0
so
206S
so
so
S
62,7
73
so
S62
,77l
$8
,216
.342
-$
9,97
6 -S
415,
084
so
so
2066
so
so
$6
2,77
3 so
5
62,7
73
S8,
279,
!15
-$9
, 97
6
-542
5,06
0 so
s
o
2067
so
so
S
62,7
73
so
S62
.713
SB
3.;1
,8&
8 ·5
9,97
6 -5
435
03
7 so
so
20
68
so
so
S62
773
so
S62
,773
58
404
661
-S
9 9
76
-S
445
013
so
so
2069
- S
l,1
21,9
S2
so
$62,
773
so -
Sl.
059,
179
$7,3
45,4
82
-S22
,26J
·S
467,
274
-Sl,
169,
IB8
so
No
te:
Hls
hli
ehte
d c
ells
ind
lc~te
the
hrs
t ye
ar t
hat
cum
ulat
ive
cost
s ar
c le
ss th
an c
ode
ba!>
ello
e.
N
0
Cu
mi.
l;il
lvl'
E.1pefl.d
l1ur~
Uu\
itie
s Fi
nane
tr1f,
Toti
l A
ll.
2
so
so
so
so
so -
S2 6
02
56
0
S6S
0,64
0 S
650,
640
so
Sl7B
,224
$1
78 2
24
SB28
B64
S
56 1
43
5172
,867
$2
29 0
10
Sl,
057,
874
SS6,
417
$167
,670
52
24,0
BB
S
l.2B
l,96
1 SS
6,46
4 S
l62,
630
S21
9,09
5 S
l,SO
l,05
6 S
56,5
12
$157
,742
S2
14 2
53
Sl.
715,
309
S56
,35S
S
lS3
00
0
S20
9 35
5 51
924
665
S
S6,
606
)148
,401
S2
0S,0
07
Sl.
129,
672
556,
653
5143
,940
52
00,5
93
52,
330,
265
S56,
677
Sll
9,6
13
51
96.2
90
Sl.
S26
55S
$56,
653
$135
416
$1
92 0
70
Sl
718,
624
$S6,
450
S
lll,
346
S18
7,79
6 52
,906
,420
SS6
•73
S
l27
398
S
183,
87l
53,0
90.2
91
S56
,497
S
ill
568
Sl8
0,06
S
S3 2
70,3
56
S56
544
$119
854
$1
76 3
98
53,4
46,7
5•
556,
56B
$1
16,2
51
Sl
72,8
19
S3,6
19,5
73
S
56,6
1S
Sll
l.75
6 53
10.3
91
S3 9
29 9
64
S56
,662
$1
09.3
67
Sl6
6,02
9 $4
,095
,993
SS
6 10
9 S
l06
079
S
162.
789
S• 2
S8 7
82
55
6,93
7 $1
02,8
91
S15
9,82
7 S4
,418
,609
SS
6 9
84
599,
798
SIS
6,78
2 54
575
.391
5
57
.lS
8
so
S8
ll 9
44
S5.
l97,
3l5
5S7
509
so
$57
509
SS 4
54 B
44
557.
SS6
so
55
7,5>
6 S5
.512
.400
S
57,6
0J
so
557
603
5S,5
70 0
03
55
7 6
';0
$(
; $S
7.65
0 SS
627
6S
J SS
7,69
B
so
S57
,698
SS
,68S
,3S
l SS
7,74
S so
S
57,7
45
SS.7
43,0
95
S57
,792
so
S
57,7
92
SS,8
00 8
87
SS
7,8
39
Sc
S57
,839
SS
858
,727
SS
7 ll
a6
so
S57
8B6
55,9
16 6
13
557,
934
so
5487
,754
S6
,o\0
4 36
1 SS
7,98
1 so
S5
7,98
1 S6
'162
,347
SS
B,0
28
so
S58
028
S6
,520
,376
S58
,07S
so
S
58.0
75
S6
,S78
.451
55
B,1
22
so
S58
,122
$6
,636
,573
S SB,
17
0
so
S58
.170
S
6,69
4,74
J
S58
,217
so
$5
8 2
17
S6,7
5l.
96
0
S58
264
so
SSB
,264
S6
,811
22
• 55
8,l'll
so
S
S8,
3ll
56,8
69,5
35
S~8 3
58
so
SS
S,35
8 ~.927
,894
SSS
406
so
5'
!23,
092
S7,7
SO 9
8S
ss8
453
so
55
8 4S
3 S7
809
4JB
S
58,5
00
so
SS
S.SO
D
S7,
867
,93
8
S58
,S47
so
S58
,547
S
l.9
26,
486
SS
8 59
S
so SS
S S9
5 S7
985
,08
0
S58
,642
so
519
9.66
2 58
1B4
742
SSB
,689
so
$5
8,68
9 S
8.24
J,43
1
SS8,
7l6
so
SS
S,7
36
S8,
302
,167
5S8
783
so
558
783
S8,
360,
9SO
SSB
fil
l so
S5
8 8
31
S
8.4
19,
7B
l
$58
,B78
so
-$1
,11
0,3
10
57,3
09,4
71
Eap
end1
ture
$ ov
er B
;uek
ne
Cum
ulau
ve so
S
24,8
40
-5
6.8
04
·S9,
l35
-5
9.35
0
·S9,
495
S9,6
34
.)9
,681
-5
9,89
7
·510
,020
.)
10,1
61
-510
,345
·S
I0,4
13
·51
0 5
40
· Sl0
,66
3
·510
,758
·S
I0.8
72
542,
062
-Sll
,04
0
·5ll
,llB
·S
ll,3
04
-S
ll 3
74
-Sil
.SIS
·S
lS,2
41
-$15
,193
- S
lS,1
46
·SlS
,099
-5
15 0
52
·S
l5.0
0S
Sl4
957
-S
l4,9
10
· Sl4
.863
S4
7,0
0.
·Sl4
,769
·S
l4,7
21
·Sl4
674
-S
l4,6
27
-Sl4
,S80
-S
l4,5
3J
Sl4
,4B
S ·5
14,4
38
-$14
,.391
-S
ll,6
57
-Sl4
296
·S
l4.2
49
-514
,202
-Sl4
15
5
S3
8,9
l2
-S14
,06
0
-S1
4.0l
3
-Sl3
96
6
·Sll
919
-S
73,3
93
Uii
end1
ture
s ov
er B
asel
ine
Atl
l\ua
l
so
$24.
840
53
164
4 S2
2 50
9 S
l3,1
60
S3,6
65
-55,
970
-S
IS 6
51
-525
,547
·535
,567
·5
45,
72B
-$
56,0
73
-S66
,486
·S
77,0
27
-SB
l,69
0 -S
98 4
47
·S1 0
9.l
l9
·S67
,257
· S
7B,2
97
·S89
,41
S ·$
10
0,71
9 -5
112,
093
-512
4.60
8 -S
ll9,
B48
·$
155
,00
·S
l70
188
·518
5.28
7 -$
20
0,33
9 ·S
215,3
H
·S23
0,30
1 -S
245,
2ll
·S26
0 07
4 -S
2ll
.06
9
·S22
7,83
8 -S
242,
SS9
·S25
7,2
33
-$27
1,86
0 -S
J86,
44
0
-530
0,97
3 ·5
315
45
8
-532
9,89
6
-$34
4,28
7 -S
35S
g4.;
$370
241
53
84,4
9()
-$39
8,69
2
·54
12,8
47
·Sl7
l,9
JS
-$.3
87,9
95
-540
2,00
8 -5
415
,974
-54
29,8
93
-$50
3,28
6
)>
CJ
CJ Cl>
::
I a.
x·
0 I _.
r 0 0 -l m
x CJ <D
::
I a.
;:::;:
c ~
<D
Al
<D
CJ 0 ;:i 0 ~ $;
c ..... ~
~.
-<
0 CJ <D
~
(")
<D
::I .....
Ol
::I a.
N
0 CJ <D ~
(")
<D
::I .....
(/)
Ol <
::I
co
(/)
0 0 ~
)>
:J
0) -<
Cf)
Cf)
0 -.
-0
0 ro :J -o:;· m
:J
Cl> ......
co
'<
0 0 0.
Cl> 3 -0 a <
Cl> 3 Cl>
:J
Ui
N
Slng
lc F
irn
ily G
u·H
eate
d H
ome
E1r.p
cna1
turc
s In
Hlll~oro
: A
h 1
ls 1
0K, A
ll 2
ls 2
°"
Ait
trn•
t.'v
tl
Aht
1r.a
U"'
2
bp
er.
d1
1u
re
Cu
m ...
1a1r
"e
(Jtp
•na-
.urt
t E.,.nai1ur~
Exp~.ture
ReD
01t
E•o
end
:tu
res
ov
e18
•\4
tl-over~ehne
llea
on
Vea
r C
11>1
1•I
"Mtl
'it.e
nanu
Uli
llt .. ,
Fl
n1
nc1
R2
, ....
A
ll.I
An
-·· C
Ym
ula
tM
~O.\l
l ~
lnle~"'-•
Uti
htoe
l fi
ftat
-c!I
\•
2017
s
s s
s s
s so
so
so
so
so
so
2
01
1
s 2
6' 6
)1
s s
·521
1 7
06
s
52
12
7
s 5
2,9
27
$
12
7
$1
11
$2Ga.~l
so
SC
·S2
U8
SO
20
19
s s
s 2.
4S6
S 1
1,4
09
s
1!.8
66
s 66
,792
·S
lS9
-Sn
so
so
$2,J'
ZO
51
1.57
9 20
20
s s
2,48
4 s
11
06
6
s us
so
s ao
1.u
·516
1 ·5
193
"' so
$
2,3
0
511
2ll
20
21
s s
s 2.
512
s 10
,714
s
13,2
4G
S 93
,58!
·S
lfiS
·S
H8
so
so
52
.llil!
I 51
0,89
3
2021
s
s s
2 52
3 s
10
.~ll
s 12
914
s
10C
i522
·5
167
·552
5 so
so
52
377
$
10
56
6
20B
s
s s
2.51
4 s
10,
098
s 12
.612
s
119,
155
·516
8 ·5
693
so
so
52,3
87
$10,
248
2024
s
s s
2.53
3 5
9.79
4 s
12,1
28
5 13
1.48
) ·5
168
·S8
6l
so
so
52,3
85
59,9
40
2025
s
s s
2 55
6 s
9.50
0 s
12.D
56
s 1
0.5
39
·5
171
·Sl.
012
so
so
52.4
05
59.6
41
2026
s
s s
2,!.
67
5 9.
214
s 1
17
12
s
lSS.
121
·S
l7J
·SU
M
so
SC
52,4
14
59,
351
2027
s
s s
2.511
s
8.9
]7
s 11
510
5
166.
811
·$17
4 ·S
l,17
9 so
5'
52
•1
9
59.
07
0
2021
s
s s
2,SC
i7
5 8,
669
s 11
,116
5
178,
067
·51
7•
·Sl.
551
so
"' 52
,414
$
3,79
8
2029
s
s s
2 55
5 s
8.40
8 s
10.9
61
s 18~
.0ll
·517
3 ·5
1.7
25
so
5'
52.4
04
sa.s
u 20
30
s s
s 1,
561
s 8.
155
s 10
,716
s
199,
747
·Sl7
4
·Sl.
899
so
so
Sl.
<08
sa
.m
2031
s
s s
2 56
6 5
7,91
0 s
10A
77
5 2
10
22
4 · 5
175
·52
07-
' so
so
52
413
$
60
28
20
32
s s
s l
57
7
s 7,
UJ
S l0
,2SO
S
220,
.;73
·517
11
-s.us
o so
50
S1
.A22
57
.786
• 20
33
s 4
222
s s
2.5
1!
s 7.
442
s 14
2.4
7 s
214.
720
54S
·$2,
l:O
S
$4 6
06
so
$2 '2
7 $7
.552
2
0!•
s
s 5
2.59
• s
1.21
8 s
•.JU
S
1«
.S12
·$
171
·Sl.
3!11
so
5
0
52
,'1
6
57,3
15
203S
s
s s
2.60
5 s
7 00
1 5
9606
s
™.1
38
·S
180
·S2.5
'l
so
SC
SJ.
US
5
71
05
2
01
6
s s
s 1
.'1
6
s li
.791
s
9 • .c
o5
s 26
3.S
44
·Sll
l ·Sl.7~3
so
S<
Sl.4~
56.
192
20
!7
s s
s }
6])
s
6'i
17
s
9,2
20
s
Hl,
764
.s1
u
·Sl.
927
so
so
Sl
47
5
6 ...
2018
s
8'1
71
s
s 2
64
4
s 6,
31
1
s 9
19
1).
1
s 37
1,66
8 S
1'6
·$
2.7•
1 S
H,1
71
"' S
l.41
' 5
6.4
84
10
39
s
s s
2.67
1 s
6.19
7 s
U70
S
380,
$38
·SIN
·S
l.92
.9
so
so
S2 s
oc
56
,28~
2040
s
s s
2.69
6 s
6,0
10
s a.7
06
s 18
9,24
4 ·5
191
·Sl.
lZD
so
so
S
l 52
4 S
610
0
2041
5
s s
2.70
7 s
5,83
0 s
IS3
7
.s 39
7 78
1 ·.S
l92
·SJ
113
so
so
52
.Sll
S
S.9
1li
'204
2 s
s s
2 71
1 s
S.6~
S •
71
s 40
6,1>
4 •
194
·Sl
SC6
so
so
$1.5
43
S!i
7J8
2
00
s
s s
2,71
9 s
S,4&
4 S
8.21
4 5
414,
367
·519
.5
·Sl,
701
so
50
Sl.
SS2
S
S,S
li6
2()4
< s
s s
1 7
40
s
5,32
0 s
10
60
s
0:22
,427
·S
l!Jt
i .$
J,8
97
so
so
s1
.s1
a S~.3
99
20<
S
s s
s 2,
7SI
s S.
160
S 7'
11
s 0
0,3
38
.5
197
·54,
C><
so
so
52 5
70
SS
.236
2"'
6
5 s
s 2.
761
s s.o
os
s 7
76
7
s 43
8.lO
C
·Sl9
8
·S4.
292
so
"' 52
.UO
S
S0
79
21>1
1 s
s s
2.17
1 s
4.8~
s 7,
627
s 44
5,73
2 ·S
l'9
·5
4,49
2 so
so
SJ
.SH
s.&
.9?6
204
8
s 3
9 7
62
5 s
2,71
4 s
4.70
8 s
47
lS.S
s
02
-'3
6
561
·5'.
4)(
$
40
5'6
so
$1
5!11
S•
77
8
2049
s
s s
Z,7
95
S
5 1,
79!>
s
495
,731
·5
213
·5-l,
&41
SC
so
52
,607
so
20
50
s s
s 2.
llO<i
s
s , .
...
s 4
98
58
7
·SIU
·5
485
6 5
0
so
Sl.
617
so
2051
s
s s
2,81
7 s
s l
.11
7
s §0
1,40
4 -$
214
-55.
010
so
so
)l.
62G
so
20
52
s s
s 2.
1128
s
s 2.
12
8
S S
04 2
32
. 21
5 ·S
S 21
5 so
so
52
6JS
so
20
53
s s
s 2
639
s s
2.1
19
s 50
7,07
1 ·S
llC
i ·S
~ 50
1 so
so
S2
.64S
5
0
20
S.
$ s
s 28
.SO
5
s 2
.&~
s 50
9,92
1 ·5
216
·$5
)'J]
so
so
S2.6
s.4
so
205S
5
s s
2,86
1 s
s 1
,161
s
512,
782
·S21
7 -~
.935
so
so
Sl"
J
so
2056
s
s s
2.17
2 s
s u
n s
S
l5,G
S4
·521
1 ·5
1515
1 so
so
S
l,67
2 Si
l
2DS7
s
$ s
2.Ml
s s
2.l
lJ
s 51
8.53
7 · 5
219
·S6
,l1
1
so
so
S2,6
12
so
2GSI
s
89
11
1
5 s
2.l!
M
s s
92 7
65
s 6
11
10
2
'1S
l ·5
6'
m
589.
171
so
51.6
91
"' 2
0'5
s
s s
2,SO
S S
s 2.
905
s 6
14,:i
:07
·522
0 -5
6.ll
n so
so
52
.70
0
so
2000
s
s s
2.91
6 S
s 2.9
16
s 61
7.12
1 ·S
?ll
-5
6.6
61
5
0
so
S2 7
09
so
2061
s
s s
2.92
7 s
s 2.
927
5
620
05
0
·522
2 · 5
61
33
so
so
52
.71
9
so
2062
s
s s
2931
1 s
s 2.
918
s 6
22 9
&8
·5
223
-S7
106
so
SC
52
728
so
20
63
s 4.
222
s s
2,94
9 s
s 7
11
1
s 6
30.1
59
.51
·5
7.1
07
54
,60<
so
52
.737
so
20
64
s s
s 2.
960
s s
2,'
60
s
63l
,U8
-S
224
·57
,Hl
so
so
SZ.7
47
so
206S
s
s s
2.97
1 $
s 1.9
71
s 63
6,0B
9 S
US
·5
7.55
6 so
so
S
l,75
6 so
20
66
s s
s 2,
912
s s
2,9
82
s
611
).07
1 S
lli
·S7.
78
2
so
SC
51,1
65
so
2061
<
s
s 2
'9J
s s
1.9
91
s
64
1.0
64
·5
226
-.51.
ooa
so
50
5
27
74
so
20
60
·S9"
.S97
so
S
30
04
so
·5
96
.SU
S
S45
,47l
·S
574
ss.m
·S
lOl,
035
S<
S2.7
14
so
No
te:
Hlg
hlig
heed
cel
tJ in
dica
te l
he f1
ts1 y
ear
thlt
cum
Y\a
lh1e
co
sts
iilre
Ins
thin
co
de
base
!IM
:.
N
)>
0 -0
-0
-0
Cl>
Cl>
.....
. :J
("
) a.
Cl>
x·
:J -o
(/)
I
0)
N
<
. .
-·
r ~
0 C
f)
0 -I
Cun
'MJi
t1ve
hp
end1
111r
u Ea
pend
!tur
ts
E•a
.rid
i1"ru
CN
rf 8
Htl
init
OW
'tf'
IH'l
i.n
.
, ... ,
AA
.2
C'°
""'Q
trve
.....
... so
so
so
so
S
5J7
U
55
3,7
13
5
91
) S
9U
S
B.8
99
56
7.6
11
·S
l25
57
1!17
SU
,57'
4 58
1.1
85
-Sll
8
5650
S
ll,2
61
$94.
446
·SlS
O
5499
m
x -0
Cl>
:J
Sll
943
5
107,
189
-515
8 S
J41
$12,
634
5120
021
-5
166
5175
51
2,)2
5 51
32,3
48
·517
1 S4
5
12
.0l6
51
.U,l
M
-518
1 ·S
'171
51
1,76
6
5lS
6.1G
O
·518
9 ·5
366
Sll
,489
51
67.b
-&9
·519
5 -~61
0..
c S
lt 2
12
5118
.161
·S
l98
·5
75?
Sl0.
9J1
S1H7~
·510
0 -s~w;
......
Cl>
Sl0
,615
S
200.4
U
·S20
S
·Sl.1
&4
510.
441
$210
9ll
·5
211
·51
37
5
;:u
Cl>
-0
0 ~
0
510
,209
52
11,l
ll
·521
7 ·5l~
!J2
51
45
85
5
25
57
)6
5383
·S
I 20
il $'
1,76
1 $1
45 4
78
· S2
l9
·Sl.
43
7
59.S
S<l
S
2S50
28
·SH
S -5
1.67
2 S
!U..t
6 S
l5".
J14
-S
2.U
·S
l 91
4 59
154
S
27
l S.l
9 ·S
2"4.
9 -$
1 U
il
$'8
8}
4
Sl7
l.J6
2
SU
&
·Sl.0
47
sa.m
5
11
11
55
-S
m
·S2
ll2
.....
. I
sa.6
24
5l8
97
1S
-S
274
·S2.
S86
Si.4
50
!3!1
8118
-$
280
-S21
Ci6
iii"
er
0 ......
51
181
$40G
,SO
O
·SU
S
·S1.
1Sl
S8.1
18
S4J
4,6 l
7
·529
1 .5
34
.u
S7
96
0
s.;l
l.S
l7
·SU
D
·S3.
7l7
s1
.so1
$4
30
19
3
·510
1 .5
4 03
&
S76o
~9
s.iJ
aC5
2
·S"'
6
·$-l
.J4
5
0 G)
57,
515
S44S
.567
·S
lll
·S-0
.65
6
s.:1
,,1
1
S.:9
1 • .tl
lll
mo
.SJ
927
52,6
07
s.;9
'.D97
·5
400
·S<
.327
0
)
51.6
17
S.:
917
14
·S40
l -~
.719
Cf)
I Cl>
0) -
SJ,
fo'U
i S:
PDJ
l40
.5
405
·SS,
134
52 6
35
5501
97'.i
·S
40il
·SS
S42
52
,6':5
55
06.6
20
·S41
0 ·S
S.95
2 Sl.6~
$509
,27,
·~ll
-S6.
ll55
(/) s·
Sl6
U
SS
IJ 9
17
·S41
S
· 56,
78
0
S2
672
SS
U 5
09
·541
1 ·5
71
97
$2
,612
5
51
7..
lll
·542
< ·5
7.61
8 59
2 56
2 56
09.A
SJ
·SS
2 -$
7,66
9 co
CD
,, 0) 3 ~
52,1
00
56l2
.5S
J ·5
-125
·S
BO
!M
52
,70
9
5615
.262
-S
428
·SIS
22
sz 7
19
S61
7 98
1 ·5
410
·$
1,9S
2 57
728
S
UD
709
.5
433
·59
38
4
$7,:
MJ
Sli
2SO
S2
517
1 ·5
92
13
$1
,747
$6
30,7
99
.543
11
·59.
651
52.7
56
S633
.5S4
.$
44
()
·SlD
Ml
S2,7
6S
5616
.119
.5
443
·510
.SJ4
_
. 0 -0
52,7
74
5619
, 0So
l ·5
'4S
·S
10,t
79
·5
98,l
Sl
SS
40
.14
l -5
2.11
1 ·S
U,2
11
CD
......
(")
CD
:J - 0) :J
0..
0 0 ~
)>
::::l Ill
'<
CJ)
CJ)
0 __,,
-u
0 ro ::::l - ~ m
::::l Cl>
....,
co
'<
0 0 Q
_
Cl> 3 -0
....,
0 <
Cl> 3 Cl>
::::l -CJ) N
N
Sin
.sic
Fam
llv G
u-H
ea
ted
Ho
me
fJl.p
endh
ures
In
Ben
d: A
lt l
ls 1
0", A
lt 2
ls 2
0%
I " Mem•tiv~l
All
ef'n
itiY
e 2
bP
@A
dll
Ufl
' C:Um~l.ii~
b:pencitur~
Expe
nditu
res
Exp
end
iture
""'""
Ek1>~nd
11ures
0\l
l'r
8<H
l!!lin
e ov
er B
a,e.
llne
i;i.e
ooo
Yea
r C
a ~t
al
Mai
n1c:
w.n
ce
Uti
liti
es
fl
nar
icin
P
To1a
l A
lt.l
A
n nu~
C"m
ut.lU
ve
C.u
rit•
I M
ain
ten
1nce
lJ
IBitl
es
2017
s
s s
s $
s so
so
so
so
so
20
18
$ 26
S.l
48
S s
·521
2.27
8 s
SJ,
070
S S
l.07
0 S
270
S270
$2
68,S
6l
so
so
2019
s
s s
2 6
Sl
S 11
.440
$
14,0
'1
s 6
71
61
·S
149
<120
so
so
S2
.462
20
20
s s
s 2
688
s 11
096
s
1l7
M
S 8
09
44
·S
lS4
·S
l4
so
so
S2 4
9l
20
21
s
s s
2,7
24
s
10,7
63
$ ll
,46
6
s 94
,431
·S
160
·Sl9
4 so
so
$2
,524
20
22
s s
s 2,
738
s 10
,439
s
U,1
77
s 10
1,60
8 ·5
163
• ·S
lS6
so
so
S2,S
l7
2023
s
s $
2.7S
l S
10 1
25
s 1
21
78
5
120,
486
·$16
5 ·S
522
so
so
$2 5
49
20
24
5
5 5
2.75
3 s
9 82
1 s
ll 5
74
s 1
33
06
0
-516
6 ·5
688
so
so
52 5
50
2025
$
s s
2.78
2 s
9,S2
6 $
U,3
07
s 14
5.36
7 ·S
171
-$85
9 so
so
S2
.S74
20
26
$ s
$ l.
196
s 9.
239
s 12
,0lt
i s
157,
40l
·S17
4 ·S
l,03
2 so
so
$2
,S87
20
27
s s
$ 2
804
s 8,
962
s ll
765
s
16
91
68
·S
l76
·S
l20
8
so
so
$2.5
93
202
8 s
s s
2 79
6 s
8 69
2 s
11
48
9
S 18
0 6S
1 ·$
176
·Sl
384
so
so
$2,5
87
2029
s
s s
2,78
2 $
8.43
1 S
11.2
11
$ 19
1,87
0 ·S
l76
·$1.
560
so
so
S2,S
7S
2030
s
s s
2.79
0 s
8,17
7 s
l0,t
67
s
202,
837
·$17
8 ·S
l,73
8 so
so
S2
.S81
20
31
s s
s 2,
791
s 7,
932
s 1
07
29
$
213
S66
-$17
9 ·S
l 91
7 so
so
$2
581
20
32
s s
s 2,
812
$ 1
69
l $
10 5
05
s 22
4,07
0 ·<
182
·S2
099
so
so
$2,6
00
2033
s
4,22
2 s
s 2.
819
s 7,
462
s lA
,SO
l $
238,
573
538
·S2,
060
$4
,606
so
52.~
2034
s
s s
2,83
3 s
7 23
8 s
10
071
s
248
644
·S18
6.
-S2
246
so
so
52 6
18
203
5 s
s s
2,84
8 s
7,02
0 s
.... $
258
512
-Sl8
8 · S
2 43
.+
so
so
$2 6
ll
2036
s
s <
2.
863
s 6°~
s 9
672
s 26
8 18
4 ·S
l9l
·S2
62S
so
so
S2 6
43
20
l7
s s
s 2,
884
s 6,
604
s .....
s 27
7,67
2 ·$
194
·S2.
819
so
50
52.6
02
2038
s
89 8
71
5 s
2.89
8 s
6.40
6 s
99.1
15
s 37
6.84
7 S
l75
·S
2.64
4 S8
9,87
1 so
S
2,67
4 20
39
s s
s 2,
934
s 6
21
l s
g 1
48
s 38
5 99
S ·S
201
.s2
846
so
so
S2
.705
2
040
s
s s
2.96
3 $
6 02
7 s
.,.,
s 3
94
,98
4
·SZO
S ·S
30
Sl
so
so
$2
,73
0
2041
s
s s
2,97
1 s
5.8
45
s .....
. s
40l.
807
·S20
8 -S
3,2
59
so
so
52,7
43
2042
s
s s
2,99
2 s
S,67
0 S
.. ,u
$
412
469
-$21
0 · S
3,46
8 so
so
S2
,7S5
20
43
s s
s 3,
007
s 5,
499
S 1,
506
s 42
0,91
5 ·S
212
·S3,
680
so
50
$2,7
68
2044
s
s ~
3021
s
5 33
4 s
a.us
s
429
330
·S21
4 ,5
3 89
4 so
so
S2
,780
20
45
s s
$ 3.
036
s 5.
174
s 1,
200
$ 43
7,$3
9 ·S
216
.s.;
,10
9
so
so
S2,7
93
2()4
6 s
s s
3,0S
O
S 5
,01
6
$ ....
$ 44
5,60
8 ·5
218
·S<,
327
so
so
gso
s
2047
<
s
<
30
65
<
4,
867
''
7,H
2
s 45
3 54
0 ·<
220
-~4.
S(.7
so
so
S2
.818
20
48
<
39 7
62
s s
3 07
9 s
4.72
1 s
47
5&
2
S S0
1.lD
2 54
0 .5
4 S0
6 S4
0 S4
6 so
S
2.83
0 20
49
s $
s 3,
094
s s
3,03
'4
S S
0'.1
96
-S24
7 -S
4,7S
3 so
so
$2
,843
20
SO
s s
s 3,
109
s s
3,1
0!
s 50
7,lO
S ·S
248
·SS,
001
so
so
S2 S
SS
20S
l s
s s
3,17
3 s
s l,
113
S S
l0,4
28
·S24
9 ·S
S 2S
l so
so
S
2""
' 20
52
s <
s
31
38
s
s l
131
$ 51
3 56
6 . s
iso
·S
S 50
1 so
so
$2
880
2
05
l s
s s
3,1S
2 $
s l,
15
2
$ 51
6,71
8 ·5
252
·SS,
7S3
so
so
52,8
93
20S4
s
s s
31
67
s
s l
1'7
$
S19
SSS
$2S3
-5
6 00
6 so
so
$2
,905
20
55
s s
s 3
18
1 I
s s
31
11
$
S23
066
.525
4 ·S
6 26
0 so
so
S2
.918
20
S6
s <
$
31
96
5
s J
19
6 1
<5
26
26
2
·S25
S -<
6 51
S
so
so
S2 9
l!l
2057
s
5 s
3.21
1 s
s l,
211
$ 52
9.47
3 ·$
257
·S6,
772
so
so
S2,9
4l
2058
s
89.8
71
5 s
3,22
S $
s .....
. 5 62
2,56
9 S1
13
·$6,
658
$89
871
so
$2.9
55
2059
s
s s
3 24
0 s
s ....
s 62
5,80
9 ·5
259
-S6
91
7
so
so
S2,9
68
2060
<
s
s 3
2S4
S s
HS
4 I
< 6
29 0
63
-526
0 -S
7 1
71
so
so
S2 9
80
2061
s
s s
3,26
9 s
$ J.
269
s 63
2,33
2 ·$
261
-57.
439
so
$0
52,9
93
2062
$
s s
3,28
3 s
s l,
213
s 63
5 61
6 ·$
263
·57,
701
so
-so
S
3005
2
06
l $
4 22
2 s
I 5
3,29
8 5
s 1
520
$ 64
3 ll
6 ·S
42
·S7
743
$4,6
06
so
S3,0
18
2064
s
s s
3 3
13
s
s H
l3 I
<
64
64
49
·5
26S
·S8
008
so
so
$3
03
0
206S
s
s $
l,32
7 $
$ 3,
321
s 64
9,77
6 ·5
266
·SB
,274
$0
so
S3
,043
20
66
s s
5 3,
l42
s
s 3,
34
2
s 6S
3,11
8 ·$
267
·SS
542
so
so
53.D
SS
2067
s
s s
3 35
6 $
s :u
s&
s 6S
6 41
4 -$
269
·58,
810
so
so
53 0
68
2068
-S
99,8
3S
SD
Sl3
7l
$0
- $'6
,464
S
S60,
010
-sss
s ·S
9 66
5 ·S
lOl
03S
so
S
3,08
0
No
te:
Hl1
hfi
&h
tcd
cc!
ls ln
olc
ilte
th
(' f
irst
Ylii
lr t~t c
um
ulii
tiv
c c
ost
s <1
re l
cu
lhil
n c
od
e bu
~e:h
l'lC
!.
CU
MU
lall°
"I!!
£1~-'"llUf
l!!S
FIN
nc:u
ur
To1a
1 A
n..2
$0
$0
so
·S
214
,8SO
$
Sl.
7ll
S
Sl.7
1l
Sll
.S7
9
S14
,041
S
67.7
Sl
Sll
.231
S
U 7
24
SS
l,47
7 Sl
0.89
3 S
l3,4
17
$94,
894
S10,
S66
Sl3
,102
S
l07,
996
510
248
Sl2
,791
51
20,7
93
59 9
40
S12
489
Sll
3.2
83
S9.6
41
S12
.21S
S
l4S
,498
$
9,l
S!
$ll
918
S1
S7.4
36
S90
10
Sll
,66
3
S169
099
SB
798
S
ll l
84
S1
80 4
84
SB.5
33
$11,
108
S19
1.S
9l
SB,2
77
$10
,857
S2
02.4
•9
SS,0
28
Sl0
,615
S
2l3,
064
S7 7
86
SlO
l8
6
s221
•so
S1
,S52
51
4,76
4 S2
38.2
14
S7.3
2S
S9.
944
S248
158
S7
lO
S S9
736
S2
57 8
94
S6 8
92
S9,S
35
S26
7429
$6
,684
S
9,34
6 S2
76.7
15
$6,4
84
$99.
029
S37S
,804
S6
.289
S8
.994
S3
84 7
98
$610
0
S8.8
l0
Sl9
3,62
8 $5
,916
S8
.6S9
$4
02,2
87
SS.7
38
S8.
49l
5410
,780
$5
,566
S8
333
S4
l9 1
14
SS 3
99
S8 l
79
$427
292
SS
.236
SB
.029
S4
3S.3
21
SS~
$7.8
84
$4<1
3.20
5 S<
926
S
71
'4
Sos
o 94
9 5
41
78
S
4815
4 S
•99
103
so
S2.8
43
SSO
l,946
$0
S2
,8SS
S
504,
80l
$0
$2
868
S5
07,6
69
so
52 8
80
S510
549
so
S2
,89
l S
5l3,
442
so
$2,9
05
SS16
,347
so
S2
918
$5
19 2
65
SC
S2 9
30
S
S2l
!9S
so
$2
,943
S
525,
l38
so
S92,
826
S617
,96S
so
$2
968
S6
20 9
32
so
S2.
980
S62
l 9
1l
$0
$2,9
93
S626
,906
$0
S3
,005
S6
29.9
1l
so
51,6
24
S637
,S3S
so
5
3 0
30
S6
41l
S65
so
$3,0
43
S643
,608
so
S
3,05
5 S6
46,6
64
$0
Sl.
068
S649
,732
$
0
.597
954
S5
51,7
71 Ex
P@nd
1tu1e
s
ow
r B
ue
line
Cum
..la
llw
so
S913
·S
200
·S21
4 · S
229
·Sl3
7
·S24
6
·S25
1 ·S
263
·S27
1 ·S
278
·S28
1 ·S
28l
·S28
7 ·S
293
·S
300
Sl
OO
-S
313
·S32
0 -S
327
·S33
6 S
28
- S3S
5 ·S
365
·$37
2 ·S
l78
·S
384
·Sl9
0
·S39
6 ·S
402
·S40
8 S
6l2
-$49
8 ·S
SOl
-S50
5 -S
S08
·S
Sll
...
·SS
lS
-S51
8 ·5
521
·SS2
4 -S
l57
-SS3
1 .5
534
·S53
7 ·S
541
562
-SS4
7 ·S
S50
·S
SS4
·S
5S7
·S2
l4S
l:xp
end
1tur
M
iNe
1 81
\ell
ne
Ann
ual
so
S91
l S
lll
5498
S
210
$32
-~214
·S46
S -$
728
·$99
9 ·S
l,27
7 ·S
l,557
·S
l.83
8 ·S
2.12
6 ·S
2 4
19
·$
2 71
9 ·S
2.41
9 ·S
2,73
2 .5
3 O
S3
·$l3
80
·S
l.71
6 -S
3.68
8 ·5
4,04
2 ·$
4,40
8 ·S
•.77
9 -S
S,1S
7 ·S
5,S4
1 ·S
S.93
1 ·S
6.32
7 ·S
6 72
9 -$
7,1
37
·S
6 so
s ·S
7 00
3 ·S
7,SO
S ·S
B 0
09
·SB
S17
·S
9,02
9 -S
9 S4
3 ~10061
.<10
SS
l · S
ll.1
06
·Sll
,26
3
-Sll
794
-$
12 3
28
·Sl2
,865
·S
il 4
06
·Sll
3M
·S
ll 8
91
·514
,442
·$
14,9
96
·515
553
·5
17 8
98
l:l
)>
Cl>
-0
....,
-0
~ Cl>
:::
:l :::
:l -
Q_
en
:;;:
· Il
l 0
<
I
::::l
w
co
Vl
r 0 0 -i m
x l:l Cl>
::::l
Q_
;:
;:
c ....,
CD
::::0
CD
"O
0 ;:::i.
0 ....,
OJ
CD
::::l
Q_
G)
Ill
CJ)
I Cl> ~
en
::::l
co ro
"Tl
w
3 '<
......
0 "O
Cl>
....,
()
Cl> ~
Ill
::::l
Q_
N
0