building capacity on asti systems : cta’s experience michael hailu and judith francis cta

19
BUILDING CAPACITY ON ASTI SYSTEMS : CTA’S EXPERIENCE Michael Hailu and Judith Francis CTA

Upload: logan-welch

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BUILDING CAPACITY ON ASTI

SYSTEMS : CTA’S

EXPERIENCE

Michael Hailu and Judith FrancisCTA

About CTA

CTA is a joint international institution of the ACP Group of States

(79) and the EU (27).It operates under the

framework of the Cotonou Agreement.

CTA is funded by the EU.

Our MissionTo advance food and nutritional security, increase prosperity

and encourage sound natural resource management by

providing access to information and

knowledge, facilitating policy

dialogue and strengthening the

capacity of agricultural and rural

development institutions and

communities in ACP countries

3 Strategic GoalsTo support well informed, inclusive agricultural policy processes and strategies in each ACP region to empower smallholder producers, women and youthTo promote priority value chains in the ACP, especially for smallholder producersTo strengthen the information, communication and knowledge management capacities of ACP institutions and networks

Strategic Plan 2011- 2015

Food security, climate change, regional trade & markets, agricultural innovation, ACP generated contentMulti-disciplinary/multi-stakeholder knowledge platformsIntegrated information systems and communities of practiceTools, methods and approaches to facilitate policy formulation and analysisCase studies & synthesis studies for evidence-based policy & decision-makingPublications – print and electronic, websites

Themes & Activities

Challenges for ACP AgricultureLittle diversification in

products or servicesIncreasing hunger and food insecurityInability to compete in domestic, regional and international marketsSector is under-resourced (human & financial capital)Low investments in S&T & limited capacity torespond to challenges e.g. climate change and achieve sustainable developmentLimited engagement of S&T experts in policy processes

Africa's increasing population

Africa has the lowest on expenditure on R&D

SOURCES: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/c4/c4s5.htm

R&D Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa Scenario

Just 8 countries of 31 countries for which data is available met the 1% of total GDP national R&D investment target put forward by NEPAD.

Name of University

Country African Ranking

World Ranking

University of Cape Town

South Africa 1 324University of Pretoria

South Africa 2 507Stellenbosch University

South Africa 3 540Makerere University Uganda 10 1,256University of Johannesburg

South Africa 12 1,395Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology

Ghana 13 1,559

University of Nairobi

Kenya 26 2,452

University of Ibadan

Nigeria 41 3,499

Université de Ouagadougou

Burkina Faso 63 4,984

African Universities Ranking

Africa’s top university is 324th

Most significant barrier to

innovation in Africa is lack of qualified

people

Source: Webometric, world university ranking http://www.webometrics.info/top100_continent.asp?cont=africa

Innovation SystemA complex

network of policies, institutions and actors

CTA Capacity Building on ASTI Systems in ACP Countries

2003 – Sensitization of key decision makers to gain buy-in (e.g. CORAF, FARA)

2004 - Initial training of 6 ACP experts (e.g. ISRA, IRAD) on understanding innovation processes and applying the innovation systems approach (ISA) to analyzing the ACP agricultural, science, technology and innovation (ASTI) system

Development of TOT manual, conducting regional ASTI System training workshops & incorporating ACP experts in the training (e.g. 2010 CTA/ANAFE /CORAF/Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey Niger workshop)

Support for national case studies (>20) – led by ACP experts (e.g. Rice and fisheries in Senegal, plantain & fisheries in Ghana, cassava in Cameroon & Nigeria)

Piloting the development of ASTI system performance indicators

Key Partners (EU & Africa only)

Photo: 2010 CTA/ANAFE /CORAF/Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey Niger workshop

CountriesCommodity for

Diversification

Export Commodity under threat

Commodity for Food Security

Cameroon (IRAD)

Cocoa Cassava

The Gambia (NARO)

NERICA rice

Ghana (CSIR & UoG)

Plantain, fisheries

Grenada Nutmeg

Jamaica Ginger & Mango Sugar

Kenya Floriculture

Malawi Maize, fisheries

Nigeria Cassava

Papua New Guinea

Rice Banana

Senegal (ISRA) Rice, fisheries

St. Vincent & The Grenadines

Banana

Tanzania & Uganda

Banana

Samoa & Tuvalu Noni (Morinda citrifolia)

Lessons from CTA Case Studies (1)

Lessons from CTA Case Studies (2)Linkages

among actorsActor LinkageIntensity

Jamaica – Ginger & mango

Cameroon – cassava & cocoa

Senegal - rice

Public research - enterprise

Weak Average Average - strong

Public research – extension/diffusion

Average Average Average - strong

University – enterprise/farms

Weak Weak - Average

None - Weak

National – international research

Weak - Average

Strong Strong

Extension / diffusion – Enterprise

Average Average Average - strong

Enterprise – enterprise/ Farmer - farmer

Strong Strong Very strong

Lessons from CTA Case Studies (3)

Cassava Innovation System Cameroon (IRAD)

Lessons from CTA Case Studies (4)Infrastruct

urePNG – Rice Jamaica -

gingerGrenada - nutmeg

Tanzania - banana

Malawi - maize

Government incentives for innovation

Weak Weak Weak Weak Average

Scientific / skilled manpower

Weak Average Weak Weak Average

Competence of local universities

Weak Weak Weak Weak Average

Competence of R&D org

Average Average Weak Very Weak Weak

Intellectual Property Rights

Weak Weak Weak Very Weak Weak

Venture Capital

Very Weak Weak Weak Very Weak Weak

Quality of ICT services

Weak Strong Average Weak Weak

State of Power

Average Strong Average Weak Weak

State of water supply

Average Average Average Weak Weak

Environment for Innovation

ConclusionsMajor Lessons ISA is relevant but not well understood

National policies exist but implementation is weak

Little innovation is taking place (except at farm & SME level)

Knowledge infrastructure is inadequate – universities and research organizations outside of the innovation system & extension is weak;

Low investments & limited access to funding for research, training and new technologies for key commodities that are important for food security etc;

Competencies are lacking in critical areas for innovation

Small holder farmers not valued as allies in the fight against hunger and poverty

Recommendations Enhance the policy &

institutional framework Invest in research, tertiary

education & extension Improve science & technology

infrastructure Develop human resources

(youth and women) Facilitate access to

information – technical, financing and marketing (local, regional, international)

Optimize the use of ICTs

Innovation is essential 4 Development

CTA & ASTI in the Future

Integrate training material into existing university programmes (ANAFE, FARA & RUFORUM as partners)

Support further training and case studies with a focus on French West and central Africa (ANAFE, CORAF/WECARD as partners)

Publish the outputs of ACP case studies on CTA K4D website

Build a community of practice of ACP experts on innovation systems

Link CTA innovation systems and value chain development work

www.cta.inthttp://knowledge.cta.int/http://agritrade.cta.int/

[email protected]