building bridges for student and institutional success stephen roche, vp for student services dr....

24
Building Bridges for Student and Institutional Success Stephen Roche, VP for Student Services Dr. Don Williams, Senior VP for Academic NASPA International Assessment and Retention Conference June 7-10 2007 St. Louis MO Presenters

Upload: jeffry-clarke

Post on 31-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Building Bridges for Student and Institutional Success

Stephen Roche, VP for Student Services

Dr. Don Williams, Senior VP for Academic

NASPA International Assessment and Retention Conference June 7-10 2007

St. Louis MO

Presenters

Florida Hospital College of Health Sciences

□Young – 15 years old□Small – 2000+□Faith-Based□Mission

□Nurture □Excellence□Spirituality□Stewardship

The External Expectations

□Demands of Health Care Institutions □Critical thinking□Advanced clinical preparation□Increased number of graduates

□West Point

How the bridge was built□Administrative Support

□Increased and reallocation of Budget Dollars

□Space for Student Success Center

□Student Services change of Focus

□Change in attitude□Mission Driven□Recognition of natural tensions

How the bridge was built

□Commitment to relationships □Standing Meetings□Joint initiatives□Committee memberships

□St. Service to Academic□Academic to St. Services

□Senior Administration

The Challenges

□The Student□Academic

Preparation□Grade inflation□ACT

□Academic Record/Expectations

□Boredom

□Study skills□Decrease in study

time

□Non-traditional

Grade Inflation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

196619681970197219741976197819801982198419861988199019921994199619982000

Year

Per

cen

tag

e

A+, A, A-

C+ orbelow

0

10

20

30

40

Percentage

Preparedfor College

Unpreparedfor College

ACT Study"Rigor at Risk"Heather Zimar

Received CoreCurriculumDid not receiveCore Curriculum

Frequently Bored in Class

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Year

Perc

enta

ge

Students who study or do homework for six or more hours per week

20253035404550

1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001

Year

Perc

enta

ge

The Non-traditional Student

□Changing expectations of the student□Knowledge to Application□Local to global□Lower to higher ordered thinking

□The Student Body Profile□More diverse□Older Student□Tech savvy

The ChargeIncrease retention in all academic programs

If relevant pedagogy is identified and implemented for each course of study

and appropriate student support systems are in place, then retention

in the identified courses of study would increase.

Relevant Pedagogy

□Problem Based Learning□Service Learning□Critical Thinking□Blended Learning

Student Support Systems

□Instructor to Support Personnel dialog□Advising and Tracking System completes

the feedback loop□Probationary contracts

□Strategic Hiring □Assistant Academic Dean for Distance

Education□Director of Student Success□Student Intervention Specialist

Student Support Systems

□Assistance with Life issues□Financial□Relational□Spiritual

□Assistance with School issues□Stress□Anxiety

Student Support Systems

□Professional Tutoring□Supplemental Instruction□On-line Tutoring□Focused and Tailored□Group or Individual

33

228

344

7184

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Total Hours

Biology Chemistry Math Physics English

Individual

General Education Tutoring 2006-2007

15

30

45

18 16

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Total Hours

Biology Chemistry Math Physics English

Group Tutoring

General Education Tutoring 2006-2007

132

190

0

50

100

150

200

Total Hours

Peer Professional

Nursing' Individual Tutoring2006-2007

142

107

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Total Hours

Peer Professional

Nursing' Group Tutoring

Results

0102030405060708090

Number of Students

Fall 2006 Spring2007

Nursing Retention 2006-2007

Opening EnrollmentEnding Enrollment

85%

68%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Fall 2006 Spring 2007

Per

cen

tag

eNursing Retention

References

Livingston, M. & Croft, L. (Speakers). (2006). Building Bridges between AcademicAffairs and Student Affairs (Audio conference). Magna Publications, Inc.

Doyle, J. A. (2004). Where Have We come from Where are we going? College Student Affairs Journal, 24(1), 66-81.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Elizabeth, J. (2005). Never Let It Rest. Change, 37(4), 44-57.

Philpott, J. L., Strange, C. (2003). “On the Road to Cambridge”: A case study of faculty and student affairs in collaboration. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 77-95

Astin, A. W., Oseguera, L., Sax, L. J., & Korn, W. S. (2002). The American Freshman: Thirty-Five Year Trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA

Zimar, H. (2007). “Rigor at Risk”: Reaffirming Quality in the High School CoreCurriculum. Retrieved from www.aacrao.org May 22, 2007.

Contact Information

□Dr. Don Williamse-mail: [email protected]

□Stephen Rochee-mail: [email protected]