building a continuum of academic and social behavior supports: data, practices and systems
DESCRIPTION
Building a Continuum of Academic and Social Behavior Supports: Data, Practices and Systems. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports pbis.org. 2 Minutes. With your neighbor, identify core curriculum across each academic subject. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Building a Continuum of Academic and Social Behavior Supports: Data,
Practices and Systems
Tim Lewis, Ph.D.University of Missouri
OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
pbis.org
2 Minutes
With your neighbor, identify core curriculum across each
academic subject
2 MinutesWith your neighbor, identify school-
wide rules and strategies for teaching social behavior
The Point…
• We can’t “make” students learn or behave• We can create environments to increase the
likelihood students learn and behave• Environments that increase the likelihood are
guided by a core curriculum and implemented with consistency and fidelity
• However, social-behavior is often the “unwritten” curriculum
The Challenge
• Appropriate social behavior is expected across all school settings
• Unlike academic behavior, measures /curriculum do not “occasion” behavior
• Limited direct measures of social behavior to allow placement in appropriate level of support
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
SW-PBS is a broad range of systemic and individualized strategies for achieving important social and learning outcomes while preventing problem behavior
OSEP Center on PBIS
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingDecisionMaking
SupportingStudent Behavior
PositiveBehaviorSupport OUTCOMES
Social Competence &Academic Achievement
Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
1-5% 1-5%
5-10% 5-10%
80-90% 80-90%
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•High Intensity
Intensive, Individual Interventions•Individual Students•Assessment-based•Intense, durable procedures
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Targeted Group Interventions•Some students (at-risk)•High efficiency•Rapid response
Universal Interventions•All students•Preventive, proactive
Universal Interventions•All settings, all students•Preventive, proactive
Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success
Why Link Academics & Behavior?
What are the effects of three instructional conditions:
a) social skill instruction,
b) phonological / phonemic awareness instruction, and
c) a combination of social skill instruction and phonological awareness instruction
on the reading related and/or social behavior of at-risk kindergarten children? (Kelk & Lewis, 2001)
Early Literary Outcome
Social Skill Outcomes
Phonemic Instruction
+/- -
Social Skill Instruction
- +/-
Phonemic and SS Instruction
+ +
Control Group - -
Essential Features at the School Level
• Teams• Data-based decision making• Problem solving logic• Instructional Focus• Access to Technical Assistance• Working toward district/regional support
Universal Strategies: School-Wide
Essential Features• Statement of purpose• Clearly define expected behaviors (Rules)• Procedures for teaching & practicing expected behaviors• Procedures for encouraging expected behaviors• Procedures for discouraging problem behaviors• Procedures for record-keeping and decision making
(swis.org)• Family Awareness and Involvement
I am…. All Settings Classroom Hallways Cafeteria Bathrooms Playground Assemblies
Safe •Keep bodies calm in line•Report any problems•Ask permission to leave any setting
Maintain personal space
WalkStay to the right on stairsBanisters are for hands
•Walk•Push in chairs•Place trash in trash can
Wash hands with soap and waterKeep water in the sinkOne person per stall
Use equipment for intended purposeWood chips are for the groundParticipate in school approved games onlyStay in approved areasKeep body to self
•Walk•Enter and exit gym in an orderly manner
Respectful
•Treat others the way you want to be treated•Be an active listener•Follow adult direction(s)•Use polite language•Help keep the school orderly
Be honestTake care of yourself
Walk quietly so others can continue learning
Eat only your foodUse a peaceful voice
Allow for privacy of othersClean up after self
•Line up at first signal •Invite others who want to join in•Enter and exit building peacefully•Share materials•Use polite language
Be an active listenerApplaud appropriately to show appreciation
A Learner
•Be an active participant•Give full effort•Be a team player•Do your job
•Be a risk taker•Be prepared•Make good choices
Return to class promptly
•Use proper manners•Leave when adult excuses
•Follow bathroom procedures•Return to class promptly
•Be a problem solver•Learn new games and activities
•Raise your hand to share•Keep comments and questions on topic
Benton Elementary
FRMS Total Office Discipline Referrals
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06
Total ODRs
INSTRUCTIONAL HOURS GAINEDProjected (50%) vs. Actual (Aug-Dec 2000)
2145HOURS
4290HOURS
474 HOURS0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Total Instructional Hours Lost 99-00
Projected Instructional Hours Lost Actual Instructional Hours Lost
HOURS1671
ADDITIONALInstructional Hours
78%
Impact on Moving Students to More Restrictive Settings
• Elementary Schools who implement SW-PBS referred students to alternative/special school at lower rates compared to schools who were not implementing SW-PBS (r = -0.4306, p < 0.01)
• Elementary Schools who implemented SW-PBS have less recidivism to alternative settings once students returned to home-school
Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23 (4), 462-473.
Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (in press). Examining the effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Todd, A., Nakasato, J., & Esperanza, J., (in press). A Randomized Control Trial of School-wide Positive Behavior Support in Elementary Schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.
Universal Strategies: Nonclassroom Settings
• Identify Setting Specific Behaviors
• Develop Teaching Strategies
• Develop Practice Opportunities and Consequences
• Assess the Physical Characteristics
• Establish Setting Routines
• Identify Needed Support Structures
• Data collection strategies
Lewis, T. J., Colvin, G., & Sugai, G. (2000). The effects of precorrection and active supervision on the recess behavior of elementary school students. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 109-121.
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
2 0
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
2 0
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
1 2
1 4
1 6
1 8
2 0
0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5 3 0
Daily Sessions
Baseline Precorrects & Active Supervision
Recess 2
Recess 3
Recess 1
Universal Strategies:Classroom
• Use of school-wide expectations/rules
• Effective Classroom Management– Behavior management
– Instructional management
– Environmental management
• Support for teachers who deal with students who display high rates of problem behavior
Structural Analysis Setting Factors Assessment Tool
• Level 1: Classroom Set-up and Structure
• Level 2: Context Specific Activities
• Level 3: Instructional Delivery and Tasks
• Level 4: Student Behavior
Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30, 25-40.
Case Study
• SFAT– Significant variables:
• clarity of expectations & directions
• consistency of expectations
• accessibility of class schedules
• lack of enforced procedures (especially regarding to hand raising and verbalizations or entire class).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Baseline Level 1 Level 1 & 2 Level 1, 2 & 3 Follow-Up
Mea
n P
erce
nt o
f Tea
cher
Beh
avio
r
High Structure Materials Accessiblity Rules Visible Assistance Consistent Answering Consistent
Tier II Interventions• Social-Behavioral Concerns
– Social skills
– Self-management
• Academic Concerns– Peer Tutors
– Check in
– Homework club
• Emotional Concerns– Adult mentors
Linked to School-wide
STUDENTS RECEIVING A "BEHAVIOR PLAN"
EIGHT OR MORE REFERRALS
1999/2000 vs. 2000/2001
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
A* B C D E F* G H I J* K L M N O P
STUDENT NAME
NUMBER OF REFERRALS
REFERRALS 99-00 REFERRALS 00-01
AVERAGE PERCENT DECLINE IN REFERRALS
50%%
*STUDENT LEFT SCHOOL DISTRICT BEFORE THE END OF THE ACADEMIC YEAR
SSRS-T Social Skills
Non PBS PBS
Pre Mean 72.8 (56-86) 78.3 (70-84)
Post Mean 80 (61-103) 90 (77-125)
P Value .11 .04*
SSRS-T Problem Behavior
Non PBS PBS
Pre Mean 123.6 (110-138) 124.8 (113-133)
Post Mean 121.4 (102-139) 124.7 (115-138)
P Value .50 .97
* Significance at the .05 P Value
Table 1. Pre- and Posttest Scores for Subjects on Dependent Variable (SSRS-T)
Tier III
• When small group not sufficient
• When problem intense and chronic
• Driven by Functional Behavioral Assessment
• Linked to school-wide system
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7
0
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 2 9 3 0 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 3 7
L a r ry
D a v e
J a c k
D a i l y S e s s i o n s
B a s e l i n e C l a s s r o o m In t e r v e n t i o n C l a s s ro o m &In d i v i d u a l I n t e r v e n t i o n
Trussell, R. P., Lewis, T. J., & Stichter, J. P. (in press). The impact of universal classroom interventions and individually designed behavior interventions on problem behaviors of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders,
Field Elementary School
SW-PBS and RtI with Literacy
Field Elementary School• High Diversity
– School has 290 students; 50% minority; 20% English Language Learners; 13% special education
• Instructional leader turnover• Poverty
– 79% of students qualify for free and reduced lunch
• Highly transient population
Field Elementary School
• Academic Standing– Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)
• 5% of all students scored proficient in 2005, according to the Missouri Assessment Program. Breakdown by ethnicity:
– 0% African American– 18% Caucasian– 0% Students with disabilities– 0% English Language Learners– 7% Free/Reduced Priced Lunch
Field Elementary School
• Literacy• In 2004–05, 44% students required
intensive support for reading and writing
• Social Behavior• In 2003-04 Averaging 10.4 discipline
referrals per day
Impact
• Literacy• In 2004–05, 44% students required intensive
support for reading and writing. This number shrunk to 31% in 2007–08.
• Shifted to a structured, explicit, research-based core literacy program with three tiers:
– One: Benchmark– Two: Strategic Intervention– Three: Intensive Intervention
• Monitor progress in fall, winter and spring
Impact
• Improved Academic Standing– Annual Yearly Progress
• In 2007, 27% of Field’s students scored proficient (up from 5%).
• African American: 0% improved to 16%• Caucasian: 18% improved to 57%• Students with disabilities: 0% improved to 25%• English Language Learners: 0% improved to 27%
Response to InterventionEVIDENCE-BASEDINTERVENTIONS
STUDENTPERFORMANCE
CONTINUOUSPROGRESS MONITORING
DATA-BASEDDECISION MAKING &PROBLEM SOLVING
RtI Applications (Sugai, 2007)
EARLY READING/LITERACY SOCIAL BEHAVIOR
TEAMGeneral educator, special educator,
reading specialist, Title 1, school psychologist, etc.
General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title 1, school
psychologist, etc.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING
Curriculum based measurement SSBD, ODR, record review, gating
PROGRESS MONITORING
Curriculum based measurementODR, suspensions, behavior incidents,
precision teaching, attendance
EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS
5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension
Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting,
group contingency management, function-based support, self-
management
DECISION MAKING RULES
Core, strategic, intensive Primary, secondary, tertiary tiers
Implications• Empirical support for components of SWPBS
continuum• Empirical support for universal impact• Emerging support for “value add” of school-wide
on tier II and tier III interventions
Measuring process & systems necessary to connect tiers across wide range of students, behaviors and adults without standard instruments
Big Ideas• Develop Core curriculum (social & academic)
– Teach & Practice
• Data-based decision making– Evaluate effectiveness
– Identify “non-responders”
• Continuum of supports firmly linked to core curriculum– Small group/targeted
– Individual
• Systems, systems, systems
• Problem Solving using logic of PBS & RTI
Systems, systems, system
Kauffman states “…attempts to reform education will make little difference until reformers understand that schools must exist as much for teachers as for student. Put another way, schools will be successful in nurturing the intellectual, social, and moral development of children only to the extent that they also nurture such development of teachers” (1993, p. 7).