build upon: initial public buildings sector workshop
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda
08.30 Session 1 – Setting the Scene
09.35 Session 2 – Behaviour Changes and Awareness
10.45 Coffee Break
11.05 Session 3 – Business Models & Legislation
01.00 Lunch Break
02.00 Session 4 – Introduction to Green Leases
04.00 Event Ends
#BuildUpon
I. Co-creating an ambitious national renovation strategy for Ireland (2017 – 2020)
II. Renovating Ireland’s residential buildings stock: Barriers & Opportunities
#BuildUpon
#BuildUpon
• Energy Efficiency Directive (art. 4)
• National Renovation Strategies
• Long-term vision
• Updated every 3 years
#BuildUpon
#BuildUpon
#BuildUpon
#BuildUpon
#BuildUpon
Q.1 In your opinion, what are the main barriers to large scale deep
renovation in the public buildings sector?
Q.2 What kind of changes are necessary for large-scale deep
renovation to happen in the public building sector?
#BuildUpon
Q.1 In your opinion, what are the main
barriers to large scale deep renovation
in the public buildings sector?
#BuildUpon
Government Funding Arrangement
AwarenessTop level management’s buy in
Lack of Accountability
Capital Funding
Energy Performance Contracting
#BuildUpon
Q.2 What kind of changes are
necessary for large-scale deep
renovation to happen in the public
building sector?
#BuildUpon
Long-term commitment at Government Level
End-to-end multi-disciplinary project
development support
Long-term funding commitment
Off balance sheet accounting
Accountability
“Ring Fencing” savings achieved for service improvement
Training
#BuildUpon
Thank you
Marion Jammet
www.buildupon.eu/ireland
01 681 5862
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649727.
Initial Public Buildings Sector
WorkshopMajella Kelleher
Head of Energy Demand Management
Farmleigh, Dublin
16th June 2016
Agenda
• Energy drivers in public sector
• Public sector programme
• Building energy usage and deep retrofit
Energy Drivers in the Public Sector
National Targets
Public Sector Targets
Exemplar Role
Reporting
Audits + Standards
Purchasing
Building Regs / Ratings
Energy Use in Irish Public Sector
• 324 Public bodies
• 3,800 Schools
• €600m Energy spend
• 33% Target
• Reported publically
Deep Retrofit in public sector buildings
• Challenges
– Definition
– Fit with NZEB?
– Perceptions ?
– Economics
– Financing < 5-7 year
payback
– Lighting, controls,
heating systems
• Opportunities
– Hybrid financing
– Invest now to leave
buildings ‘right’ for 10+
years
– Asset Renewal
Strategy vs Deep
Renovation Strategy ?
Energy Standards Development
LIEN EstablishedLarge Industry
Energy Network
201520142011200920051995
IS393Irish Energy
Management Standard and
Energy Agreements Programme
EN16001European
Energy Management
Standard
ISO50001International
Energy Management
Standard
IS399Irish Energy Efficient Design Management
Standard
Certified Energy
Efficient Design
Designed
Verified
Managed
Public Sector Energy EfficiencyPresentation to the IGBC Build Upon Seminar
16 June 2016
Overview
• The case for public sector energy efficiency
• What’s new in the forthcoming Strategy
• The challenges – your feedback
The case
Slide 40
Energy efficiency internationally recognised as cost effective way to tackle climate change; Central to Energy White Paper and reducing reliance on fossil fuels by 80-95% by 2050; public sector 33% target in place since 2010
• The public sector takes a national leadership role in deploying energy efficiency projects and initiatives.
• The delivery of this Strategy is a shared, whole of Government, effort where all Government Departments, and the bodies under their aegis, play their part in embedding best practice in energy management as part of their business delivery.
• In the context of public sector reform, the public sector takes an action focused and results driven approach to sustainable and cost effective energy management, thereby delivering better value for money and better services for citizens.
• The public sector contributes to the development of a more sustainable energy system, a reduction in our harmful emissions and a cleaner healthier environment now and for future generations.
What’s new
Slide 41
• Communicating the policy message – explaining how public sector energy efficiency fits into the wider low carbon transition and public sector reform
• Call for increased action – half way to target, but step-change required. Strategic actions identified
• Establish a large project pipeline and enhance project support – support development of large scale projects and aggregation of small scale; manage balance sheet impact; monitor energy management plans of large users
• Establish a robust governance structure – senior manager accountability; embed the priority across Government – annual Memo to Government establishing common understanding of challenges and successes; embed energy management and training in public sector business planning
The challenges – your feedback
Slide 42
• Leadership – must come from the top and must be communicated to the
top; part of business planning; way for Ireland to demonstrate its
commitment to climate action and EU goals; focus on four big user groups:
Local Authorities; Commercial State Bodies; Healthcare and Third Level
Education;
• Funding – identify projects first; create a project pipeline; advice on when
EPC appropriate
• Technical expertise and procurement – technical advice on NZEB;
energy management training; certification
• Incentives – retaining savings has been identified as key
• Coordinating and maximising action – making energy efficiency part of
wider business planning; aggregation of projects
Dr. Richard Bull
THE WICKED AND WILD CHALLENGES OF
FOSTERING ENERGY EFFICIENCY ENGAGEMENT IN
ORGANISATIONS
The challenge of energy & behaviour in non-domestic
buildings
• Organisations (including commercial, public and industrial) account for between
50% and 60% of energy use worldwide
• Buildings constituting 18% of emissions from buildings in the UK and 20%
globally
• More complex – in terms of building type/agency/control/ethics/organizational
culture
• Increasing research and interest in digital economy and ICT based solutions,
e.g. visualisation of data (feedback/dashboards) and SMART/Intelligent
Buildings relating behaviour change
The digital economy is more than just controls, feedback
& dashboards . . .
“Our electronic networks are enabling novel forms of collective
action, enabling the creation of collaborative groups that are larger
and more distributed than any other time”
Clay Shirky
. . . & behaviour change is more
than information provision . . .
S, Arnstein, "A ladder of citizen participation." Journal of
the American Institute of Planners 35: pp. 216-244 (1969).
Three benefits of engagement
1. Democracy is increased as all citizens have a right to participate and
be represented in environmental decision making
2. Non-experts are often more attune to the ethical issues of a situation
3. Greater acceptance can often be achieved by involving all those
affected by the particular situation
B, Sovacool, “What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and
proposing a social science research agenda.” Energy Research & Social Science 1: pp. 1-
29 (2014).
Gooddee2ds: Research context and methodology
• 18 months funding from the UK Engineering and Physical Science Research Council - Digital
Economy ‘Research in the Wild’ (The ‘wild’ was Leicester City Council)
• Aim of Gooddee2ds: to explore a participatory approach to the development of a web-application to
help building-users reduce energy consumption in non-domestic buildings.
• Approach:
– 5 meetings with a user-group of ‘lay & expert’ building users
– Issued with iPhones
– Development of an ICT-based ‘reporting tool’ based on user-input to encourage participation.
– Ongoing monthly meetings with users.
• Findings from this paper are based on a focus-group with the user-group and semi-structured
interviews with the user-group and some other actors
Positive about engagement . . .
• Putting faces to names
– We don’t have a lot of contact with other city council departments about this kind of thing. What I
actually find quite useful here is the fact that if we can report something we get a named person who
will become responsible for it, and also as part of this user group . . . I’ve met them now. (M4)
• Knowledge sharing
– The library assistant (F1) for example said she hoped to “find out more about how this energy, power
and everything is worked out . . . and to look at how we can reduce wastage”.
– This was echoed by the energy services team leader (M5): Having a group that shares knowledge is
always important . . . there isn’t one good way of doing a particular thing, and therefore sharing what’s
around the table is the whole idea.
– “But with the user group as a whole I think there wasn’t a problem having the different age groups
because I think that helped us get the understanding of different people’s views, so that was a good
thing I suppose” (R003)
Barriers to participation (1) : general workplace issues
1. “They’re more thinking about their day job and what we’re doing and it’s
just tunnel, the vision’s tunnelled into and the energy impacts are outside of
that tunnel for me.”
2. “I think it’s widely known anyway, across the board, because it’s a very
stressful environment and it’s very pressurised, I think some people just
sort of see it as, well, screw the system, really. Again it’s not really like, hey,
you shoot them by leaving your computer on overnight, but I think it’s that sort
of childish mentality that affects some people.”
3. “The bottom line of it comes to the fact that they’re not paying it. If you
were paying it you would be a lot more cautious with regards to how you use
various things” (L1)
Conclusions & Reflections
1. There is no ‘one-size fits all’ magic bullet . . .
2. The technical opportunities are there to provide innovative social media
platforms to enable collaboration around energy management & people did
value the user-group experience. – People were able to share energy consumption data and to benefit from instant sharing of photos and data across multi-
site facilities.
3. Attempting to ‘climb’ Arnstein’s ladder of participation is a challenge to
organisations’ notions of control, power and responsibility
4. Who’s behaviour are we trying to change?
Further reading . . . .
• Bull, R., Lemon, M., Everitt, D., & Stuart, G. (2015). Moving beyond feedback: Energy behaviour and local
engagement in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 8 32-40
• Bull et al (2014) Digitally Engaging and Empowering Employees for Energy Demand Reduction: A New
Approach for the Next Generation? ACEEE Summer Study Conference Proceedings. August.
• Bull et al (2013). Are people the problem or the solution? A critical look at the rise of the smart/intelligent
building and the role of ICT enabled engagement. ECEEE Summer Study Conference Proceedings 2013,
pp. 1135-1145; 5A-079-13
• Bull, R., J. Petts, et al. (2008). "Social Learning from Public Engagement: Dreaming the impossible?"
Journal of Environmental Management and Planning 51(5): 703-718.
• P. C. Stern, K. B. Janda, M. A. Brown, L. Steg, E. L. Vine, and L. Lutzenhiser. "Opportunities and insights for
reducing fossil fuel consumption by households and organizations." Nature Energy 1:16043. (2016).
• Contact: [email protected]
• Twitter: @richbull
Re:fit – Driving Energy Conservation Retrofits within Public Sector Buildings
Glyn Mountford – Re:fit PIU Team WalesDirector – GEP Environmental Limited
What are we going to cover ?
• Introducing Re:fit & GEP Environmental
• Tendering of the Re:fit framework
• Eligibility to use the framework
• Basic Re:fit contract structure between parties
• Measures permitted under the framework
• The framework contractors
• Refit projects and how the programme works
• Re:fit achievements
• Summary of Re:fit key benefits
Company Profile
GEP Environmental Limited (GEP) is a highly experienced engineering and environmental consultancy with
significant experience in public sector, commercial and property sectors.
Independent advisers and auditors to several public and private sector frameworks:
LHC framework, the Carbon & Energy Fund (CEF) pool of independent technical advisors
Re:fit London Independent M&V advisors
Resource Efficiency Scotland (RES) Low Carbon Programme, Zero Waste Scotland (ZWS) Technical
Frameworks
Health Facilities Scotland (HFS) Technical Framework
Resource Efficient Wales (REW) Programme and the Re:fit Wales Programme Implementation Unit
Core services - Energy, Environment, Training:
Impartial engineering design, project and programme management, resource efficiency, environmental
management, building auditing and surveying, verification and training services
Specific support for metering services, on site monitoring including power, voltage, flow, temperature
(heat and cooling circuits) monitoring, specification and project management support
Energy and environmental compliance services including CRC support and auditing, RHI and FiT support
and certified ISO 14001 and ISO 50001 management systems
GEP project engineers are accredited under the following schemes:
CIBSE Low Carbon Consultant, CIBSE EPC Accredited Assessors
Register of Professional Engineering Consultants (RPEC)
ISO 50001, ISO 14001, ISO 9001 Lead Auditors
Certified Measurement and Verification Professionals
Stroma, BRE and CIBSE accreditations for the Energy Performance of Buildings assessments
Introducing Re:fit
• Established by the Greater London Authority in 2008/9
• Works with the EU’s Energy Performance Contracting (EPC) model
Provision of Financing
Contracts
Financial Guarantees
Procurement and Energy Performance Contract
Determining Energy Savings
EPC Best Practice – Case Studies
• Framework of Service Providers or Framework Contractors
• OJEU compliant (Official Journal of the European Community)
• Guaranteed savings programme
• Robust M&V – IPMVP compliant
Introducing Re:fit
Energy Performance Contracting model (EPC) :
• Savings and investment performance criteria set at tender stage
• Savings contractually guaranteed (kWh)
• Verification of savings – IPMVP
• Multiple tranches may be called up using only one procurement engagement
Framework of 16 Service Providers (3rd framework since 2010) :
• Framework created by CCS, GLA , LP and DECC, extensive pre-qualification
• Fast and resource efficient tendering with standard processes
• Support for participants to deliver ‘invest to save type schemes‘ through holistic
and wide ranging retrofits with support from Salix and Welsh Government
• Over £134m procured projects to date in UK
Re:fit Cymru, Programme Implementation Unit (PIU) support
• Appointed to support the Welsh Public Sector Local in April 2016
• 90% funded by ELENA (EIB), contribution by PS capped at £20k, which is halved
when schemes progress
Re:fit allows public bodies to include multiple buildings and ECM’s within a
single OJEU procured Energy Performance Contracting framework providing
energy reduction and alternative energy schemes which have scale and can
be expedited within months.
localpartnerships.org.uk 65
• TENDERING OF THE FRAMEWORK
National Framework for UK Energy Performance Contracting (RE:FIT):
• Procured in accordance with relevant legislation and advertised
accordingly in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU).
• OJEU contract notice 2015/S 214-3912 was published in November
2015, following a prior information notice to the market in September
2015.
• Supported by the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) as the procuring
agent and the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).
• Highly competitive procurement means leading industry players secured
on robust contract terms and pricing approaches.
• Framework runs for 4 years, but contracts under the framework can run
for significantly longer e.g. solar PV 20-25 years
• The upper threshold for total purchases is £1.5 billion for the 3rd UK Re:fit
framework
localpartnerships.org.uk 66
• ORGANISATIONS ELIGIBLE TO USE FRAMEWORK
• Details on the organisations that are eligible to use the Framework
were stated in the OJEU contract notice.
• Extensive list means that the framework should be useable by
• public sector organisations across the UK
• a range of third sector organisations
• organisations required to follow public contract regulations as
part of their funding arrangement.
• The applicability and ability to use the framework is a decision for
the relevant organisation
localpartnerships.org.uk 67
• ELIGIBLE ORGANISATIONS INCLUDE
• Central government departments, local
government and public corporations that
can be accessed at the Public Sector
Classification Guide:
• http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/na-
classification/national-accounts-sector-
classification/index.html
• Local authorities (England and Wales)
• http://www.idea.gov.uk/idk/org/la-data.do
• http://www.ubico.co.uk/
• Non-departmental public bodies
• https://www.gov.uk/government/organisation
s
• National parks authorities
• http://www.nationalparks.gov.uk/
• Educational establishments in England and
Wales, maintained by the Department for
Children, Schools and Families including
schools, universities and colleges but not
independent schools
• http://www.education.gov.uk/edubase/home.
xhtml
Police forces in the United Kingdom
https://www.police.uk/contact/force-websites/
Registered social landlords (housing
associations).
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/curr
ent-registered-providers-of-social-housing
Third sector and charities in the United
Kingdom.
http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/find-
charities/
http://www.oscr.org.uk/search-charity-register/
https://www.charitycommissionni.org.uk/ShowC
harity/RegisterOfCharities/RegisterHomePage.a
spx
http://socialenterprise.org.uk/membership/our-
members/members-directory
http://www.sporta.org/member-directory
Citizens Advice in the United Kingdom.
http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/index/getadvice
.htm
http://www.cas.org.uk/
http://www.citizensadvice.co.uk/
localpartnerships.org.uk 68
• ELIGIBLE ORGANISATIONS INCLUDE
• National Assembly for Wales, Welsh Assembly Government and Welsh local authorities, and all bodies covered by:
• http://www.assembly.wales/en/Pages/Home.aspx
• http://gov.wales/• NHS Wales.• http://www.wales.nhs.uk/ourservices/directo
ry• Housing associations — registered social
landlords Wales• http://gov.wales/topics/housing-and-
regeneration/publications/registered-social-landlords-in-wales/?lang=en
• Universities in Wales.• http://www.uniswales.ac.uk/universities/• Colleges in Wales.• http://www.collegeswales.ac.uk/en-
GB/wales_colleges-42.aspx• Schools in Wales (nursery, primary, middle,
secondary, special, independent schools and pupil referral units).
• http://gov.wales/statistics-and-research/address-list-of-schools/?lang=en
All other contracting authorities cited by name in Schedule 1 to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.All other contracting authorities cited by class in Schedule 1 to the Public Contracts Regulations 2015.Any corporation established, or a group of individuals appointed to act together, for the specific purpose of meeting needs in the general interest, not having an industrial or commercial character, and(i) financed wholly or mainly by another contracting authority listed above in this section VI.3) of this notice;(ii) subject to management supervision by another public sector body listed above in this section VI.3) of this notice; or(iii) more than half of the board of directors or members of which, or, in the case of a group of individuals, more than half of those individuals, are appointed by another public sector body listed above in this section VI.3) of this notice;(iv) an association of or formed by one or more of the public sector bodies listed above in this section VI.3) of this notice.Entities which are not public sector bodies may also use the Framework Agreements if the Contracting Authority is satisfied (see OJEU Contract Notice)
And a lot more not listed here
localpartnerships.org.uk 70
• MEASURES PERMITTED UNDER THE FRAMEWORK 1/3
• energy reduction / energy efficiency measures such as:
• provision and installation of new equipment
• optimisation of equipment (including existing equipment)
• provision of related services
• maintenance in relation to any of the above
• energy generation measures such as:
• provision and installation of new equipment
• optimisation of equipment (including existing equipment)
• provision of related services
• maintenance in relation to any of the above
• associated works and services (including design) in relation to
any of the above
•
• The Framework covers energy efficiency retrofit and local
energy generation measures in their broadest sense to enable
a wide range of improvements.
localpartnerships.org.uk 71
• MEASURES PERMITTED UNDER THE FRAMEWORK 2/3
• associated works and services (including design) in relation to
any of the above
• wider property improvement in support of Re:fit projects (provided
a significant element (at least 50% of the project value) is covered
by energy reduction / energy efficiency and/or energy generation
measures)
• financing of any element of the project
• a guarantee of savings
• measurement and verification services
• potential for specific requirements to be incorporated into projects
to cover wider strategic goals and benefits e.g. economic
(including job creation), environmental, and/or social.
• The Framework covers energy efficiency retrofit and local
energy generation measures in their broadest sense to enable
a wide range of improvements.
localpartnerships.org.uk 72
• MEASURES PERMITTED UNDER THE FRAMEWORK 3/3
• Boiler installations
• Boilers
• Building and facilities management
• Building construction work
• Building services
• Co-generation plant construction
• Construction work for power plants and
heating plants
• Construction-related services
• Cooling and ventilation equipment
• District heating
• Electricity supplies
• Electricity supply installations
• Energy and related services
• Energy-efficiency consultancy services
• Energy-management services
• Engineering design services
• Exterior lights
• Financial and insurance services
• Heat recovery systems
• A very wide range of service and works categories were included within scope. The following is just a selection:
• Heating engineering services for buildings
• Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning
installation work
• Installation of doors and windows
• Installation services of electrical and
mechanical equipment
• Lighting systems
• Operation of a power plant
• Other sources of energy supplies and
distribution
• Repair and maintenance services of building
installations
• Roof repair and maintenance work
• Solar installation
• Solar panels
• Street lighting equipment
• Street lighting columns
• Thermal insulation work
• Water installations
• Works for complete or part construction and
civil engineering work
Re:fit Framework Providers
16 specialist Service Providers appointed in March 2016
Offer vast range of innovative technical and EPC expertise
• Ameresco Ltd
• Bouygues Energy
• Breathe Energy
• British Gas Trading Ltd
• Cynergin Projects Limited
• EDF Energy Customers plc
• Engie (formerly Cofely)
• Herbert T Forrest Ltd
• ISS Facility Services Ltd
• Kier Services
• Larkfleet Limited
• Matrix Control Solutions Ltd
• Prima Vera S.p.A.
• Robertson Construction Group Limited
• SSE Contracting Limited
• Vital Energi Utilities Ltd
73
Types of Re:fit projects
Maintenance back log
Large Iinfrastructure & Renewables
Quick fix / fast track projects
Optimising existing sites
Schools
Project values £25-50K + per
school
Small Works
All Sectors e.g. LA’s, Trusts,
Colleges
Project values up to
£1m
Major Works
All Sectors e.g. LA’s, NHS, FE
Project values £1m +
Re:fit system
•Senior support required
•MoU signed
Gain
Management
Buy-in
Secure
Funding &
Resources
Prepare
Project Brief
Mini
Competition
Investment
Grade
Proposal
Install
Energy
Conservation
Measures
Monitor
Performance
•Internal resource selected
•Funding approach chosen
•Benchmarking
•Final buildings selection
•Tendering approach chosen
•ESCo site visits
•Bids submitted
•Evaluation and preferred bidder selection
ECMs and savings detailed and guaranteed
Installation and commissioning/handover
•Measurement & Verification
•Guaranteed savings
Service
Delivery/
•Measurement & Verification Guidance –instruction
Re:fit achievements so far
Organisations
directly engaged:
• Higher & Further
Education
• Schools
• Local Authorities
• NHS
• Police
• Central
Government
• Cultural and
Heritage
Buildings procured:
• Universities
• Colleges/ Schools
• Civic centres
• Hospitals
• Cultural centres/
Libraries
• Fire stations
• Police buildings
• Office buildings
• Community buildings
• Leisure centres
• Theatres/ Museums
Audited energy savings pa*
35,000+
£165m+ Capital investment procured
£50m+ Near-term pipeline
250+
Tonnes CO2saved pa*
* Audited 2015
1000+
£50m+
£10m
52k
Recent National Re:fit projects *does not include London
* Over 48 public sector organisations have run Re:fit projects so far
Re:fit summary of programme benefits !
Guaranteed savings
Easy to use, compliant OJEU framework
Tested, proven, f lexible approach
Dedicated ELENA funded support to public sector
bodies in parts of UK including Wales
No shared savings
Re:fit Contact
Contact
Re:fit Programme Implementation Unit (PIU)
Glyn Mountford
+44 (0) 7843 421712
Aims
1. What are Green Leases?
2. What do they cover?
3. What do they mean in practise?
4. What is our experience?
5. What can we expect in the future?
The BBP is
A collaboration of the UK’s leading property owners who work together to
improve the sustainability of the UK’s existing commercial buildings.
Our aim is to
Enable market transformation through sustainability leadership and
knowledge sharing across the property industry.
What is a Green Lease?
Technically: drafting included in a lease which provides for the environmental management and performance of a building.
In practice: a tool for engagement between owner and occupier on the environmental management and performance of a building.
BBP Approach
Green Lease
• Legally binding• Agreed during lease
negotiations• Time dependent on
lease• Inflexible• High level
Green MoU
• Not legally binding• Entered into at anytime
of the lease• Can remain in place for
any length of time• Flexible• Greater specificity
BBP Experiences & Challenges
Green Leases
Wide ranging views from occupiers From full agreement to complete rejection. Generally office
sector is much more comfortable with the concept.
Have been occasions where occupiers have requested green clauses within the lease
Generally ‘light’ green Are environmental ratings systems moving us towards
‘darker’ clauses?
Key hurdle can be lawyers and agents Clauses often rejected through fear of unknown or simply not
asking their clients
Used as a bargaining chip
BBP Experiences & Challenges
Green MoU
Can be more challenging than leases
Requires time & effort from both
No time limit on signing, so no
Difficult to find right people to speak
Allows greater details of aspirations / actions / targets for a building than a lease
Will they make a difference?
All well and good signing a green MoU or green lease but this needs to translate into
action!
Lessons learned
1. Common misunderstanding of terminology
Do we need to call them green leases anymore?
2. In practise an engagement tool on environmental issues
3. Templates already available for use
Lease clauses
MoU
4. Need to consider how words translate into action
5. No one size fits all – key is to find a solution that works for you
National scheme operator
Green Lease work packages
1 Desktop research on international best practice
Building capacity of working groups to understand potential for Green leases.
2 Defining Technical & Legal characteristics
Technical task group define technical aspects, such as data sharing, clauses, MOUs, Legal input,
3 Developing Irish Case studies
Trial and feed back on any existing green leases, or early adopters of developed templates.
4 Developing Irish Green lease toolkit
Bringing together the work above into a guide on Leases and MOUs suitable for the Irish context
5 Education and dissemination
Developing accredited CPD for public and private sector, channels for dessemination etc