bsili 2013 day 2.0

Upload: 3csn

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    1/49

    WELCOME BACK!!

    TUESDAY

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    2/49

    Response to Feedback

    Yay!!! Boo!!! College narrativesSpecific examplesSupportive environmentPowerful people!Fun, play Active learningGroup/team discussionReflection timeBreaksMetacognitive log

    Questions:What are the first/next steps?When can we learn more about

    each specific initiative or campus?

    Suggestions:Less paper More quiet/reflection/longer

    breaksEarlier team time

    Requests: glossary, snacks,poster fixins, name tags!!!

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    3/49

    Gallery Walk

    Representatives from each group stand byposter

    Walk around, view, listen, and providefeedback

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    4/49

    Threshold Concepts

    Professional Reading Together

    Jigsaw

    Discuss: How does the notion of Threshold Concepts relate to our workhere at BSILI?

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    5/49

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    6/49

    Program Theory-Driven Evaluation

    Resourcesand Inputs

    Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact

    Plann ed Work Intended Resul ts

    Assumptions

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    7/49

    Resources/Inputs Activities Impact Outputs

    OutcomesS/M/L

    Theory of Action

    Action & Change

    Theory of Change

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    8/49

    Theory of Actionvs.

    Theory of Change

    ToA What you do ToC What happens because of what you

    do

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    9/49

    Theory of Change

    Two Components: Map

    Narrative So that chain Specificity

    Operationalized

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    10/49

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    11/49

    Short TermOutcomes

    Impact Medium

    TermOutcomes

    Long TermOutcomes

    Theory of Change

    Leveraging Mechanisms

    Activities

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    12/49

    Threshold Concept

    Generalized Statistics variance

    Shutter speed and aperture Individual

    Science of inquiry

    The affect caused by a threshold conceptis change . Change in perception.

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    13/49

    3CSN Theory of Change2/3/10

    ProfessionalLearningActivities

    New Forms of Professional

    Learning

    New Forms of Professional

    Identity

    Community of Practice

    PowerfulClassrooms

    Working AcrossCampuses

    Greater StudentSuccess

    AssumptionsIf we provide training on networking and use action research methodologies, teachers will transform their environments, their identity and create communities of practice, creating powerful classrooms and working acrosscampuses. This in turn will produce greater student success.

    Science model: documenting this research creates fact, which then can be replicated

    This is a reflective & recursive process.

    Teaching & Learning Organizational

    Environment Pedagogy Classroom

    Environment

    Faculty/Staff Attitudesand Assumptions

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    14/49

    BSI Theory of Change5/11/10

    Network Activities

    Greater StudentSuccess

    AssumptionsIf we provide training on networking and use action research methodologies, Colleges will transform their environments, their identity, and create communities of practice, creating powerful communities that work across theState. This in turn will produce greater student success.

    Science model: documenting this research creates fact, which then can be replicated

    This is a reflective & recursive process.

    OrganizationalEnvironment

    CommunityAssumptions

    InfrastructureSupport

    Policy Support

    StatewideDialog

    Basic Skills-FocusedCommunity

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    15/49

    3CSN ToC Work

    Training

    Networking

    Community of Practice

    SchoolEffects

    StudentEffects

    3CSN Theory of Change1/21/2012

    Activities Conferences Board Presentations Workshops LINKS BSILI Webinars Newsletter Website Co-sponsor Conference BSI Coordinator Events Community of Practice Regional Network Meetings

    Principles/Values: Action Research; Transformation; Re-Affirmation; PreachingTo The Choir; Connectivity; Ethical Contact

    Transformed Environmento Space to belongo Shifting BSI Committeeso Regional Relationshipso Campus Events

    Transformed Identityo Instructorso Studentso AdministratorsEthical Contact Leading With Empath y

    Syllabi Redesign 100 Sections of

    Acceleration Working Across Depts.&Campuses Powerful Classroomso Applied Learningo Connectivityo Safeo Self-Identityo Trusto Caring Educator Efficacy

    Gatekeeper Completion(academic success) Empowerment Self-Efficacy Connectivity Sense of Belonging College Going Norm

    Products White Papers

    C. of P. Package Website

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    16/49

    Learning Networks

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    17/49

    Values

    Values inform change definitions Its importance or implication

    Identifying outcomes requires explicatingvalues

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    18/49

    3CSNs ToC Narrative

    If we provide training on networking and we useaction research methodologies, community college professionals will transform their environments and identities to createcommunities of practice that will produce

    powerful learning and working acrosscampuses. This will lead to greater student success .

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    19/49

    LOGIC MODELING

    Michaels stuff

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    20/49

    Roles for Theory in Evaluation

    Social Science Theory

    Program Theory

    Evaluation Theory

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    21/49

    CDC Evaluation Framework

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    22/49

    Program Theory

    A systematic configuration of stakeholders

    prescriptive assumptions (what actions must be taken)and descriptive assumptions (what causal processes areexpected to happen) underlying programs, whether explicit or implicit assumptions.

    - Chen, p. 136, Evaluation Roots , 2004

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    23/49

    Definition of a Logic Model

    The program logic model is defined as a picture of how your organization does its work the theory and assumptions underlying the program. A program logicmodel links outcomes (both short- and long-term) with

    program activities/processes and the theoreticalassumptions/principles of the program.

    - The W.K.Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    24/49

    Step 2: Describe the Program

    Why Use a Logic Model?Logic models provide a

    Road Map

    of aprogram. Drawing a picture of expected program

    achievements and how the achievements willbe realized.

    Creating a visual of relationships hypothesizedto exist between the program activities and theintended program effects

    Logic Models describeexpectations/intentions of a program.

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    25/49

    Step 2: Describe the Program

    Common Logic Model Components

    Resources/Inputs

    Resourcesneeded to

    achieveprogram

    sobjectives

    Activities

    What theprogram

    does withresources tomeet

    objectives

    Outputs

    Direct productsof program

    activities

    Outcomes

    Changes that result from theprogram

    s activities and outputs

    External Factors/Context: Description of environment in which program takesplace

    Assumptions: The underlyingassumptions that influence the programsdesign, implementation or goals

    IntermediateLong

    term

    Short

    term

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    26/49

    Step 2: Describe the Program

    Constructing a Logic Model

    Move from right to left answering the followingquestions: What do I want to accomplish with this program? What changes do I expect to see from this program?

    In whom or what will these changes occur? What do we do to affect change? Then revise, refine, and more precisely describe and

    visually depict the relationships among components Connect components with arrowsto show flow Describe the context in which your program resides &

    operates

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    27/49

    Logic Model Exercise

    Get together in your teams and begin toidentify elementsRemember to:

    Start with desired outcomes short list consensusDiscussion of how outcomes might occur Leads to details of how the program is expected

    to affect intermediate outcomes (know asproximal outcomes or mediators)Draft of program theory/logic model is developed

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    28/49

    Logic Model Analyses What is your ultimate outcome? What is your theory of change? Your theory of action? What part of this model do you expect to evolve and on

    what schedule?

    Are the outputs indicators of activity? Are the outcomes indicators of change? Can you identify potential stumbling blocks? What resources might be added? Other ideas for improvement?

    St 2 D ib th P

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    29/49

    Step 2: Describe the Program

    Logic Model ExampleHIV Prevention Program for Native Americans

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    30/49

    CA Success Network (CA SN) Logic ModelCalifornia community colleges must expand their capacity to improve student outcomes in basic skil ls instruction, English as a Second Language, and related support services. Colleges report that 70-90% oentering students place into one or more basic skills course areas: reading, writing, and/or mathematics. The statewide course completion rate in basic skills is 60.5%, and only 50% of those students persist toand complete the next level course. Historically underrepresented students are over-represented in basic skills courses, and their success rates are frequently lower than the rates for other student groups.Community colleges' efforts to improve outcomes in basic skills cannot be separated from their responsibili ty to produce equitable graduation, certificate, and transfer rates for historically underrepresented aunderprepared students.

    Resources-ASCCC-Steering Committee-LACCD Fiscal Agent& ConsortiumCoordinator -BSI LACCD ProjectDirector -BSI Regional NetworkCoordinators-Campus BSICoordinators-Student Advocates-Campus BSI ActionPlans-Sustainableinformation sharingsites

    Target Population

    -Administrators-Faculty-Support Staff -Students

    Activities

    CollaborativeLearningNetworks

    Coordination with core organizations(Alliance building among ASCCC, LACCD Project, Other Partners)-Guide statewide infrastructure development-Assist in securing funds for acquiring additional resources to support State & Regionalinfrastructure

    Increased Learning,Success &

    Persistence of Students

    Short-Term Outcomes

    SkilledImplementation of Responsive,Innovative,IntegratedEssential

    Academic SkillsCurriculum

    Inputs

    Create statewide infrastructure(Permanent learning network among 110 Colleges and a CCC Center)

    -Establish statewide coordinating center -Guide the development of and coordinate & support a system of regional networks-Coordinate & support partnerships among professional development efforts-Provide vision & support for the development of innovative professional developmentactivities

    -Introduce & engage in collaborative evaluation activities that generate knowledgeabout effective learning to transform practice

    Develop a cadre of campus leaders-Conduct Summer Leadership Institute, ASCCC Workshops, Other Leadership Institutes & on-going professionaldevelopment activities

    -Develop strategies to retain effective leaders-Guide annual revision of Campus BSI Action Plans-On-going evaluation of the process and impact of professional development activities

    Promote models of effective practices-Build capacity of all faculty to teach students who are underprepared for learning in college courses-Develop Web-based, virtual teaching & learning communities, including a virtual resource library-Engage in collaborative evaluation activities

    Formally engagekey CCC policy

    makers(e.g., APG groups,

    Local Board of Trustees)

    Innovative/ Alternative &

    EngagingMethodologies/Pedagogy at

    CCCs

    IncreasedSuccess of Students

    Personal Goals,

    Completing AA/AS &Certificate

    Programs &

    Transferring to 4Yr Colleges

    Statewide Adoption of Policies that

    SupportInnovative/

    Alternative &Engaging

    Methodologies/Pedagogy at

    CCCs

    Create regional level infrastructure (networks)-Develop & support long-term on-going regional professional development training & supporting materials for the targetpopulation

    -Develop infrastructure for colleges to learn about & share innovative instructional programs-On-going evaluation of professional & program activities, including benchmark assessment & capacity building

    Long-Term Outcomes

    Local Policy Adoption

    Supporting SN &Other BSIInitiatives

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    31/49

    Family Involvement Project (FIP) Logic Model

    Inputs Activities Short-Term Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes

    see ip positions

    Establish FIPsustainability

    Increase parents

    levels of involvementin their childrens

    education parentswork closely with

    school systems andk leadersh

    Increaseinvolvement of

    parents associatedwith FIP in their

    childrens education

    Increase awarenessof and commitment

    to FIP and itssustainability

    Build or strengthenlocal collaborations

    at each site to promote and sustain parent involvement

    Increase parentknowledge on howto become involvedin their childrens

    education

    Increase # of parents

    in communities whoare trained by parent

    leaders on parentinvolvement

    Build relationshipswith potential local or

    national long-termfunders

    Disseminate FIPmaterials to local andnational funders and

    organizations

    Develop coalitions of local parent

    involvement programsand organizations

    Build relationshipswith schools

    Develop anddisseminate materialson parent involvement

    to parents

    Provide technicalassistance to parent

    leaders

    Recruit and train parent leaders

    Planning:

    Evaluation Programsustainability

    Collaborations:

    Schooladministratorsand teachers Localorganizations Nationalorganizations

    Resources:

    Funding National andlocal programstaff Parents

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    32/49

    Sample Logic Model Frameworksource: http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    33/49

    PROFESSIONAL LEARNINGRUBRIC

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    34/49

    Professional Learning Rubric

    Develop Indicators of Change for Your Profess ion al Learnin g Hub usingWengers Community of Practiceframework and Impact Definitions throughValue Creation Stories

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    35/49

    Network Levels

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    36/49

    Wengers Community and NetworkValues

    Value Indicators/Evidence

    Immediate Activities & Interactions

    Potential Capital Applied Practice/Implementation

    Realized Performance Improvement

    Reframed Redefined SuccessWenger, Trayner, de Laat (2011) Promoting and assessing value creation incommunities and networks: a conceptual framework.

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    37/49

    Immediate Value

    Activities and interactions (e.g., meetings,trainings, lunches)

    Intentional and unintentional Knowledge exchange

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    38/49

    Potential Value

    Enlightenment Personal assets

    Relationships Resources Collective

    Transformation

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    39/49

    Applied

    Leveraging networks Applying a new teaching strategy

    Forming an inquiry group Applying for funding Shifting pedagogy to recognize a different

    domain of learning

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    40/49

    Realized

    Impact, beyond changes in practice Outcomes at various levels

    Short-term, rather than long-term,requiring leveraging beyond practicechanges

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    41/49

    Reframing

    Creating new definitions for success Reconsidering measurements

    New instruments Can occur at every level of measurement

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    42/49

    PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT:Ensuring Knowledgeable and Effective Teachers

    Attitudes

    Professional Values andPersonal Commitment

    -Attitudes and Beliefs-Disposition

    ! " Climate/environmentthat supportslearning

    ! " Collaborativelearningenvironment

    ! " Reflective andresponsive practice

    PedagogicalPractice to

    SupportInstruction:

    - instructionaldelivery

    - teachingtechniques

    LearningCommunity

    focused on andresulting in high

    studentachievement

    Professional Knowledgeand Understanding

    - Content knowledge subject matter andcurriculum

    - Student assessment

    - Knowledge of studentdevelopment

    Professional Skillsand Abilities

    - data skills- process- leadership skills- action research skills- inquiry skills- facilitation skills- coaching/mentoringskills

    - classroommanagement

    - technology skills

    BSILI - 2013BSILI C i f P i /H b R b i

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    43/49

    BSILI Community of Practice/Hub Rubric

    Immediate: Potential: Applied: Realized: Reframing:

    GuidingPrinciples

    1. Inquiry

    2. Collaboration& Networking

    3. Develop

    leadership

    4. Recursivepractice

    5. Assess andevaluate

    6. Shareknowledge

    Activities andInteractions

    KnowledgeCapital

    Changes in Practice PerformanceImprovement

    RedefiningSuccess

    Individual/Practitioner

    Department/Division

    Campus

    Region

    State (3CSN)

    Examples ofindicators: Attendance atmeetings;Frequency ofmeetings;Intensity ofdiscussions

    Tests & surveys;Memberretention rates;social networkanalysis

    New procedures;Collaborativearrangements; Usingcommunities andnetworks

    Speed & accuracy;More transfers;Lower attritionrates

    New learningagenda; Newmetrics; Newstrategicdirections

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    44/49

    Rubric Development Exercise

    15 Minutes Appoint a spokesperson and a note-taker

    Identify at least one entry for each row Think about the stories presented Monday Use your personal narrative work

    Come back together and share out

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    45/49

    Guiding Questions

    1. What kinds of stories resonate?2. What are the narratives that currently exist

    about community colleges, students, andfaculty?

    3. What language do we use?4. Who are the characters?

    5. Who is the protagonist? Antagonist?

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    46/49

    Providing Insight to 3CSN

    Using the rubric, identify stories Analyze and condense into categories

    Provide stories representative or illustrative of categories

    Quantify the categories

    Use survey tool to provide data

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    47/49

    Homework

    Using the feedback you received on your poster and your ongoing notes andreflections, create a new presentationpitching your SSI to a particular audience.

    Be prepared to deliver your presentation toanother team for feedback on Wednesdaymorning!

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    48/49

    Homework

    As you work on your presentation, keep inmind our ongoing attention to how wecreate narratives that will support change.

  • 7/28/2019 BSILI 2013 Day 2.0

    49/49

    Guiding Questions

    1. What kinds of stories resonate?2. What are the narratives that currently

    exist about community colleges, students,and faculty?3. What language do we use?

    4. Who are the characters?5. Who is the protagonist? Antagonist?