bs and ec
DESCRIPTION
A short comparison between BS 5950 and Eurocode 3.TRANSCRIPT
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
A comparison between BS 5950 and Eurocode 3. BS 5950 Eurocode 3 Terminology Force Capacity Mc Design strength py Dead load Live load Wind load
Action Resistance Mc,Rd Yield strength fy Permanent load Variable load Another variable load
Symbol Elastic Modulus Z Wel Plastic Modulus S Wpl Radius of Gyration r i Torsion constant J It Warping constant H Iw Changes in load factor 1.4Gk + 1.6Qk 1.35Gk + 1.5 Qk
Classification: 5.0)275(yp
=ε Classification: 5.0)235(yf
=ε
Moment Resistance Class 1 and 2: Mc = pyS
Class 1 and 2: Mc,Rd = 1M
plyWfγ
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
Class 3 semi-compact: Mc = pyZ or Mc = pySeff Class 3: Mc,Rd =
1
min,
M
elyWfγ
Class 4: slender Mc = pyZeff Class 4: Mc,Rd =
1
min,
M
effyWfγ
Low shear Fv < 60% Pv
Low Shear VEd < 50% Vpl,Rd
Shear Resistance Pv = 0.6pyA
VEd = 1
3M
yv
fA
γ
Shear Area Av = tD
Shear Area Av = A – 2btf – (tw + 2r)tf 1.04tD = htw ≈
Shear bucking d/t > 70ε
Shear bucking hw/tw > 72ε
Deflection - Serviceability LS Imposed load only Permanent action, 1δ
Variable action, 2δ Pre-camber, 0δ
Span/360 – brittle Span/200 - general
maxδ < L/250
2δ < L/350 – brittle
3δ < L/300 – general
Compression Members Pc = Agpc from table 23, 24 BS 5950 pc is a function of λ Nb,Rd =
1M
ya Afγ
χβ
χ : reduction factor depends on λ , non-dimensional slenderness
λ = λ−Φ+Φ 2
1 1≤
])2.0(1[5.02
λλ +−+=Φ a
λ = 1λλβ
=cr
ya
NAf
; yf
Eπλ =1
Ncr = cr
eff
LEI2
2π; Ieff = 0.5 IAho μ22 +
μ from table 6.8
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
LTB Mx < Mb/mLT and Mx < Mcx Mb = pb x modulus pb from LTλ from table 16
LTλ = wu βνλ (see below)
y
E
rL
=λ
ry = the radius of gyration about the minor axis Class 1 and 2: wβ = 1.0, Mb = pbSx
Class 3 semi-compact: Mc = pyZ => wβ = Zx/Sx Mc = pySeff => wβ = Sx,eff/Sx Class 4 slender cross-sections:
wβ = Zx,eff/Sx mLT from Table 18
Equal flange: 25.02 ])/(05.01[1
xλν
+=
u = 0.9 , x = D/T equal flange, I and H
1.0 for UB, UC same approach as for compression
Mb,Rd = 1
,
M
yyplaLT fWγβχ
LTλ = LTLTLT λ−Φ+Φ 2
1 1≤
])2.0(1[5.02
LTLTLTLT a λλ +−+=Φ
LTλ = 1
.
λλ
=cr
yypl
MfW
; yf
Eπλ =1
Mcr = z
t
z
wZ
EIGIL
II
LEIC 2
2
2
2
1 ππ
+
C1 results from bending diagram below aLT = 0.34 for rolled UC section aLT = 0.49 for rolled UB section Approx:
• Mcr = 22 )(
20119.0
hiLt
iL
Ah
z
f
z
+
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛
Quick determine LTλ , using LTλ = wu βνλ where y
E
rL
=λ , conservative: u = 0.9, v=1, wβ =1
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
Eq. 5.14 EC3 cl.5.3.3(1,2,3)
NEd = MEd/h Deflection:
e0 = 500
Lam ; am = )11(5.0m
+
m: number of members to be restrained
1. Load factor yM0 = 1,00, yM1 = 1,00, yM2 = 1,25
2. Tension:
1,
≤Rdt
Ed
NN ; Nt,Rd = min (
20
9.0;M
uNet
M
y
yfA
yAf
) EC3:2005 cl.6.2.3 (1,2)
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
Where: fu = 1.5fy (cl.3.2.2 (1))
Anet = A – (number of bolts)x(Diameter of bolts) cl.6.2.2.2
3.Compression
1,
≤Rdc
Ed
NN where Nc,Rd =
0M
y
yAf
for class 1,2 and 3 cl.6.2.4
4. Bending moment
1,
≤Rdc
Ed
MM cl.6.2.5
Class 1, 2 Class 3 Class 4
Mc,Rd =0
,M
yplRdpl y
fWM = Mc,Rd =
0
min,,
M
yelRdel y
fWM = Mc,Rd =
0
,
M
yeffel
yfW
Shear cl.6.2.6
1,
≤Rdpl
Ed
VV where Vpl,Rd =
0
3M
yv
y
fA
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
5.Bending and Shear Cl.6.2.8
N = yf)1( ρ− where 2
,
)12( −=Rdpl
Ed
VVρ
My,V,Rd = RdcM
yw
wypl
My
ft
AW
,0
2
, ]4
[≤
−ρ
Where Aw =hwtw
6.Bending and axial force Class 1, and 2 cl.6.2.9.1 MEd < MN,Rd
+ For only rectangular section
MN,Rd = Mpl,Rd [1- 2
,
)(Rdpl
Ed
NN ]
+ For doubly symmetrical I and H section or other flange section to resistance about y-y NEd < 0.25Npl,Rd
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
NEd < 0
5.0
M
yww
yfth
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
7.Guide for design curved beam to Eurocode 3 Determine out of plane bending stress:
Direct stress AN
WM
el
+=1σ Out-of-plane bending stress: RT
B21
23σσ =
R: radius of the section, T: Thickness of flange. B is outstand of the flange
B = )2(21 rtb −−
Reduce design strength
fyd = 2
3)2
(3 25.0
2222 στσ+⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ −−yf
- Check axial force (Please see Section 3) - Check Bending capacity (please see Section 4) - Check section capacity under axial load and bending moment at Section 6 (more obviously) Briefly with class 1 and 2: I and H section MEd < MN,z,Rd
n = Rdpl
Ed
NN
,
a = (A-2btf)/A < 0.5
+ n < a MN,Rd = Mpl,z,Rd
+ n > a MN,z,Rd = Mpl,z,Rd [1+ 2)1
(aan
−− ] = Mpl,z,Rd )
5.011(
an
−−
- Check member buckling (cl.6.3.3)
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering
British Standard vs Eurocode 3 – Steel Building Design
Reference: - Eurocode 3:1993-1-1:2005: General rules for steel building design - Bristish Standards 5950-1:2000: Code of practice for design rolled and welded sections - Charles King and David Brown (2001) Design for curved beam, SCI
Tu Trung Nguyen – MSc. Structural Engineering