brs shipbrokers project & corporate finance advisory · bnp paribas 12.0 17.6 cexim - 17.5 kfw...

24
BRS Shipbrokers Project & Corporate Finance Advisory Shipping finance market update Confidential Project & Corporate Finance Advisory [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BRS ShipbrokersProject & Corporate Finance Advisory

Shipping finance market update

ConfidentialProject & Corporate Finance [email protected]

-

2

225Shipbrokers

20Locations

CORPORATE PRESENTATION – THE OFFICES

Chairman : Tim JONES

CEO : François CADIOU

BRS GROUP

A few BRS figures:

• 225 shipbrokers, all multilingual and educated to a high level

• 1,000 newbuilding transactions in 20 years including 450 in China

BRS, each year, this is:

• 100 assets transactions

• 3,500 bulk chartering transactions

• 2,000 tanker chartering transactions

• Dry bulk CoAs of 220 million tons

• Dry bulk CoA Period business equal to 410 years

Regular recognition from the industry’s leading news outlets and specialized publications as a growing and innovative

shipping player

530Employees

AthensBeijingBogotaDubaiGenevaHamburgHo Chi Minh

Hong KongHoustonJakartaLondonLuxembourgMadridMumbai

ParisRio de JaneiroShanghaiSingaporeStamford

3BRS GROUP

FACT 1

« Many shipping banks left the market, the ones remaining are lending less »

4BRS GROUP

Commercial lendersEvolution of total Ship Finance debt outstanding

352

463

436450 455

422

401391

398

355345 340

320

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Total shipping bank debt (excluding lessors)

30% decrease in shipping loans, on same period: bulk carriers fleet capacity increased +100%, containers +60% and tankers +30%This compares to a world fleet valuated in the range of USD 1000bn

-30%

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

5BRS GROUP

58

.0

44

.8

36

.0

30

.0

20

.7

19

.5

18

.7

14

.6

13

.0

12

.2

12

.0

11

.3

11

.3

11

.2

10

.0

9.6

9.5

8.2

6.5

5.1

5.0

3.5

2.7

2.2

2.0

1.8

1.8

HSH

No

rdb

ank

De

uts

che

Sch

iffs

ban

k

Dn

B N

OR

RB

S

KfW

No

rdea

Cal

yon

DV

B

BTM

U

Llo

yds

/ H

BO

S

BN

P P

arib

as

Deu

tsch

e B

ank

Dan

ish

Sh

ip F

inan

ce

HV

B

Bre

me

r La

nd

esb

ank

SMB

C

Cit

i

Dan

ske

Ban

k

SEB

Fort

is

Nat

ixis

He

lab

a

Alp

ha

Ban

k

ICB

C

Pir

aeu

s

Ban

k o

f Ir

ela

nd

JP M

org

an

17

.6

17

.5

16

.4

14

.1

13

.5

12

.2

12

.2

12

.2

12

.1

12

.0

11

.8

10

.8

10

.8

9.8

9

.2

8.7

7

.5

6.7

6

.4

6.1

6

.0

6.0

5

.9

5.5

5

.2

5.0

4

.1

3.2

3

.2

3.1

3

.0

2.9

2

.8

2.4

2

.3

2.3

1

.8

1.7

1

.6

1.1

0

.6

0.3

BN

P P

arib

as

CEX

IM

KfW

IPEX

-Ban

k

SuM

i Tru

st B

ank

Cre

dit

Agr

ico

le C

IB

DN

B

No

rde

a

AB

N A

mro

K-S

ure

ICB

C L

eas

ing

No

rd L

B

DV

B

Cit

i

SMB

C

Bo

Co

mm

Le

asin

g

KEX

IM SEB

Dan

ish

Sh

ip F

inan

ce

Dan

ske

Ban

k

Bo

fA M

err

il Ly

nch

SocG

en C

IB

HC

OB

Min

shen

g Le

asin

g

CM

B L

eas

ing

CO

SCO

Lea

sin

g

Stan

dar

d C

har

tere

d

Ship

Fin

ance

ICB

C L

eas

ing

CSS

C L

easi

ng

CD

B L

eas

ing

AV

IC L

eas

ing

HV

B U

nic

red

it

Co

mm

. Ban

k A

ust

ralia

Swe

db

ank

CIC

Alp

ha

Ban

k

Euro

ban

k Er

gasi

as

CC

B L

eas

ing

Ch

ina

Hu

aro

ng

Leas

ing

KA

MC

O

Co

mm

erzb

ank

Am

ste

rdam

Tra

de

Ban

k

Top 5 in 2008Exposure in

2008Exposure in

2018

HSH Nordbank 58.0 6.0

DSB / Commerz 44.8 0.6

DnB NOR 36.0 12.2

RBS 30.0 -

KfW 20.7 16.4

Top 5 in 2018Exposure in

2008 Exposure in

2018

BNP Paribas 12.0 17.6

CEXIM - 17.5

KfW IPEX-Bank 20.7 16.4

SuMi Trust Bank - 14.1

Credit Agricole 18.7 13.5

Shipping banks in 12/2008

Shipping banks in 12/2018

Shipping debt: USD 460bn

Shipping debt: USD 340bn

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

6BRS GROUP

Commercial lendersChange in landscape: 10 years – movers in and movers out

(60.0)

(50.0)

(40.0)

(30.0)

(20.0)

(10.0)

-

10.0

20.0

30.0

CEX

IM

SuM

i Tru

st B

ank

AB

N A

mro

K-S

ure

ICB

C L

eas

ing

No

rd L

B

Bo

Co

mm

Le

asin

g

KEX

IM

Bo

fA M

erri

l Lyn

ch

SocG

en C

IB

Min

shen

g Le

asin

g

BN

P P

arib

as

CM

B L

eas

ing

CO

SCO

Le

asin

g

Stan

dar

d C

har

tere

d

Ship

Fin

ance

CSS

C L

eas

ing

CD

B L

eas

ing

AV

IC L

eas

ing

Co

mm

. Ban

k A

ust

ralia

Swed

ban

k

CIC

Euro

ban

k Er

gasi

as

CC

B L

eas

ing

Ch

ina

Hu

aro

ng

Leas

ing

Cit

i

KA

MC

O

SEB

Am

ster

dam

Tra

de

Ban

k

SMB

C

Alp

ha

Ban

k

Dan

ske

Ban

k

Ban

k o

f Ir

elan

d

JP M

org

an

Pir

aeu

s

ICB

C

Hel

aba

DV

B

KfW

Dan

ish

Sh

ip F

inan

ce

Dan

ish

Sh

ip F

inan

ce

Nat

ixis

Fort

is

Cre

dit

Agr

ico

le C

IB

No

rdea

HV

B /

Un

icre

dit

Bre

me

r La

nd

esb

ank

Deu

tsch

e B

ank

Llo

yds

/ H

BO

S

BTM

U

DN

B /

Dn

B N

OR

RB

S

DSB

/ C

om

mer

z

HSH

/ H

CO

B

USD +166bn

USD -258bn

New comers / increasers

Slow steamers / exiters

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

7BRS GROUP

Commercial lendersKey drivers behind this shake up: what happened ?

2008/2010 crisis killed shipping business for the leading banks (USD crisis, shipping crisis, offshore crisis)

New regulations have made shipping less attractive to banks

Banks that remained in the market now have to deal with:

More stringent regulations (Basel 3) affecting :

The cost of capital and therefore the need for side business and

The proposed structures : leverage, profile, duration

Compliance, environmental considerations

Market has developed by itself alternative ways of getting finance

What happened ?

8BRS GROUP

FACT 2

« Lenders are focusing on large companies »

9BRS GROUP

0

50

100

150

200

250

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

1-5 ships 6-10 ships 11-20 ships 21-50 ships 51-100 ships > 100 ships

Impacts of the change in financing landscape

Allocation of NEW shipping loans by company size

Commercial lenders

“Large” shipping

companies have absorbed

78% of the shipping loans

made since 2007

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Dealogic

-

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

350.00

20

07

20

08

20

09

20

10

20

11

20

12

20

13

20

14

20

15

20

16

20

17

20

18

20

19

-h1

10BRS GROUP

LENDING – Margin evolution (bps pa)

Shipping Finance market updateEvolution of debt average margin

11/2019

Sharp decrease in margins, reaching the historical low point of 2007 pre-crisis.

Disclaimer : this is market information, based on publicly or commercially available data.

Source: BRS brokers, Dealogic

11BRS GROUP

FACT 3

« Chinese Leasing has been a massive source of capital into shipping finance »

12BRS GROUP

Shipping Finance market updateChinese Leasing

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Chinese Leasing developed very quickly into shipping

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

13BRS GROUP

But Chinese Leasing does not completely offset the lenders pulling out of shipping (and, most of the time, lenders and lessors serve the same high profile companies)

Shipping Finance market updateChinese Leasing

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

14BRS GROUP

FACT 4

« Access to Capital Markets are narrowed a lot for shipping companies»

15BRS GROUP

Equity Capital Market Oslo bonds

4

2.7 2.8

3.2

21.8

8

6

2.52.7

4

2.5

0.5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

0.8

1.5

0.7

0.5

2.1

1.1

0.2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Shipping Finance market updateCapital Markets

USD bn USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Pareto Securities

16BRS GROUP

FACT 5

« Alternative lenders are opportunistically entering the market to fill the gap»

17BRS GROUP

Alternative lenders entering the market

Many announcements

Shipping Finance market updateAlternative lending

BUT

• Limited amount of liquidity available.

• Cost of finance is expensive, some claim that debt is more expensive that what can be expected on equity is an industry that tends to deliver 6-9% return in average.

• Some of those banks are involving shipowners as “advisors” or “shareholders”. This could bring some resistance to (i) share information with a competitor and (ii) get financed by an institution that is geared to repossess to operate.

• Very asset driven, does not give a lot of credit to the corporate set-up.

18BRS GROUP

FACT 6

« Shipping finance for tomorrow is a question mark»

19BRS GROUP

Shipping Finance: projected needs

Run off of portfolio : refinancing needs Orderbook

Total orderbook for pure shipping is USD 183bn

Assuming a 60% average leverage and a equal

ship deliveries distribution over 4 years this

would require c. USD 30bn new debt per year

into shipping.

Total shipping debt in place is USD 320bn, we

could assume a natural amortization of this

portfolio of 15% per year.

Giving effect of the ship ageing / depreciation we

could infer a 5% refinancing requirement to

maintain same leverage over portfolio

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Histircal lending activity Projected debt needs

USD 45bn average yearly financing requirement over the next 4 years

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

20BRS GROUP

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Historical Lending activity Chinese Leeasing Japanese Lease Bonds New loans Chinese Leeasing Japanese Lease Bonds Gap

USD 10bn average yearly funding gap over the next 4 years

Shipping Finance: projected funding gap

USD 10bn funding gap per year on the debt side for the next 4 years

Highly dependent upon Chinese Leasing for orderbook financingExport finance is a strong sponsor to finance newbuldings

USD bn

Source: BRS brokers, Marine Money

21BRS GROUP

FACT 7

«Access / Scarcity of Shipping finance is reshaping the industry on owners’ side»

22BRS GROUP

What’s next

Shipping Finance: looking ahead

Shipping finance is driving the change over the industry

Consolidation on the owners’ side in order to grow in size and access to liquidity

Increasing role of listed intermediate owners / financial owners that provide bareboat to the ship owners and receive loan from banks

Chinese Lessors tend to adopt strategy of acting as ship owners with first class charterers

The above pushes some owners to have less exposure to the asset play and act as service providers

Newbuilding activity has been (and will have to remain) supported by innovative solutions from “in-house leasing platforms” and ECAs

24

Disclaimer

These materials have been prepared by Barry Rogliano Salles and/or its affiliates (together “BRS”) exclusively for the benefit and internal useof the client named on the cover in order to indicate, on a preliminary basis, the feasibility of one or more potential transactions. The materialsmay not be used for any other purpose and may not be copied or disclosed, in whole or in part, to any third party without the prior writtenconsent of BRS.

The materials contain information which has been sourced from third parties, without independent verification. The information reflectsprevailing conditions and BRS’s views as of the date of hereof, and may be subject to corrections and change at any time without notice. BRSdoes not intend to, and the delivery of these materials shall not create any implication that BRS assumes any obligation to, update or correctthe materials.

BRS, its directors and employees or clients may have or have had positions in securities or other financial instruments referred to herein, andmay at any time make purchases/sales of such securities or other financial instruments without notice. BRS may have or have had or assumerelationship(s) with or engagement(s) for or related to the relevant companies or matters referred to herein.

The materials are not intended to be and should not replace or be construed as legal, tax, accounting or investment advice or arecommendation. No investment, divestment or other financial decisions or actions should be based solely on the material, and norepresentations or warranties are made as to the accuracy, correctness, reliability or completeness of the material or its contents. NeitherBRS, nor any of its affiliates, directors and employees accept any liability relating to or resulting from the reliance upon or the use of all orparts of the materials.

Disclaimer

BRS GROUP