brookhaven science associates rf systems for nsls-ii j. rose, a. blednykh, p. mortazavi and nathan...
TRANSCRIPT
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
RF systems for NSLS-IIJ. Rose, A. Blednykh, P. Mortazavi and Nathan Towne
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Beam Energy 3 GeV
Beam Current 500 mA
Energy loss/turn (Initial/Upgrade)
0.9 /2.0 MeV
Power to Beam
(Initial/upgrade)
0.45 / 1 MW
p/p acceptance 3%
Momentum
compaction
0.00037
X-RAY Ring RF requirements
RF parameters
Frequency 500MHz
Cavity Voltage 3.3 / 4.9 MV Bucket for 3.3MV
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II RF POWER REQUIREMENTS
Covered in baseline cost
Capability of installed RF
Installing 3rd cavity+300kW
Adding 4th cavity and transmitter
Power # installed, power in kW
# installed, power in kW
# installed, power in kW
# installed, power in kW
Dipole -, 144 -, 144 -, 144 -, 144
Damping wiggler
3, 194 4, 259 8, 517 8, 517
Cryo-PMU 3, 38 6, 76 6, 76 10, 127
EPU 2, 33 4, 66 4, 66 5, 83
Additional devices
?, 200
TOTAL 409 545 803 1071
Available RF Power
540 540 810 1080
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Cavity Choice
•High beam currents achieved by B-factories madeCESR-B, KEK-B and PEP-II cavities attractive
•Complex SUPERFISH analysis of CESR-B ofHOM impedances used in preliminary CBI growth rate estimates with ZAP: maximum growth time of 65ms for 4 cavities, less than the damping time of 8ms
•GdfidL analysis of full 3-D cavity extends analysis to dipole modes and 3-D effects (fluted beampipe)
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Cavity Modeling with CFish, GdfidL
Alexei Blednykh
GdfidL vs. CFISHBenchmark ferrite losses, superconductor surface resistanceGdfidL vs. measurementson ferrite loaded pillbox confirm GdfidL modelFull Cavity HOM results used to analyze CB instability up to ~2GHz, No problems yet but need to extend to beampipe cutoff frequency of 7GHz
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
CESR-B Cavity chosen for Baseline
Beam energy gain/cav
>2.4 MV
Eacc >8 MV/m
Unloaded Q >7108
Standby (static) losses
<30 W
Dynamic + static losses
<120W
Operating Temperature
4.5 K
Max. beam power/cavity
<250 kW
Frequency 500 MHz
SCRF chosen for lower R/Q, highlydamped HOM’s, lower operatingcost and comparable capital cost Well established commercial production. Units 15 and 16 now being produced by ACCEL.In operations at Cornell (4), CLS(2), Taiwan (2). Being commissioned atDiamond (3)
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
KEK-B Cavity Parameters
Manufactured by Mitsubishi for KEK at 508 MHz They have produced one cavity at 500MHz
*KEK has recently demonstrated 400kW per couplerKEK cavity is an option for NSLS-II
*Shinji Mitsunobu SRF2005 ThP52 High Power Test of Input Couplers and HOM dampers for KEKB Superconducting Cavity
Frequency (MHz) 500
Energy gain/cav (MeV) 2.5
E-Acc (MV/m) >12
Unloaded Q @ 8MV/m >109
BeamPower/coupler (kW) >270
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Passive Third Harmonic Landau Cavity
Elletra/SLS Super 3HC cryo-module
~1/3 of 500MHz voltage,~1 MV, can be met with one Super3HC cavity
A harmonic bunch-lengthening cavity is required to increase Touschek lifetime. Increases beam stability by increasing energy-dependent tune spread
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
1500MHz “Super-3HC” cavityVoltage/cell 0.5 MV
Eacc >5MV/m
Unloaded Q >7108
Static losses <50W
Dynamic + static losses
<100W
Operating T. 4.5 K
Frequency 1500 MHz
Harmonic Cavity for Bunch Lengthening
4.9MV @500MHz required for 3%Momentum acceptance: 1.6MV @1500MHz requires 3 cavities
Work continues on effect of bunch traintransients on bunch lengthening (N. Towne)
N. Towne
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
NSLS-II RF Straight layoutTwo 500 MHz cavities + one 1500 MHz passiveharmonic cavity fit in one 8m straight: meetsinitial power requirements
Second straight reserved forthird , fourth 500 MHz and second 1500MHz cavities asadditional user insertion devicesincrease RF power requirement
Klystrons located in adjacent RF building to minimize loop delays in feedback systems
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
RF Power Sources for Ring System
Manufacturer/model Frequency
MHz
Power
kW
Efficiency
%
CPI VPK-7957A 500 800 60
Thales TH2161B/2178 500 310/800 61
Toshiba E3774 500 180 53
Klystron can be sourced by multiple vendors
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Low Level RF System Amplitude modulation of the RF fields leads to momentum
deviations of the beam, Likewise phase modulations translate into amplitude modulations again leading to momentum deviations. The momentum errors affect beam size and orbit jitter as follows:The beam size in the center of the 5 m straight is given by
This work is in progress, and preliminary tolerances of +/- 0.5% amplitude
and 0.5 degree phase have been adopted. These values have been achieved at
other 3rd generation light sources.
22 , yyyyyxxxxx Since the dispersion is near zero (~1mm) and the natural energy spread is <0.001 the second term is negligible and the beam size becomes
σ x,y= 40μm, 2.4 μm
Effect of RFjitter on thebeam:
Orbit jitter is given as σx = σδ∙ηx , σy = σδ∙ηy σx′ = σδ∙ηx′ , σy′ = σδ∙ηy′
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
ε′
ε′′
μ′
μ′′
Modeling: Future work•NSLS-II bunch length of 4.5mm excites modes up to elliptical beam-pipe cutoff frequency•C48 Ferrite loss factor decreasing rapidly
Impedance limit for 8ms dampingtime, 4.5mm bunch length
Courtesy M. deJong, CLS
FI
VσR
os
rfradsh
rf
lim
Losses declining
By combining different ferrite tiles broad range of frequencies can be damped
V. Shemelin
0 40
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Booster Ring Requirements
Full energy booster in same tunnel 780m circumferenceEnergy loss /turn =493 keV Vacc = 1MeV for 1% RF acceptance7nC/macropulse, 1 per min.Beam current = ~3mA Beam power 3kW
1 “Petra” type cavity and (1) 50-80 kW IOT Phase in 500 MHz (radians)D
elta
-E/E
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
Conclusions
RF systems for third generation light sources are mature technology; RF cavities and power sources available from industry
The short bunch length of 4.5mm in NSLS-II means operating the CESR-B cavities in a new regime, C-48 ferrite may not meet requirements at higher frequencies: This is being studied further, newferrite combinations appear to be direct substitutes and can be incorporated in the preliminary design phase.
Work continues to define RF tolerances, however modern digital RF control systems can achieve an order of magnitude improvement over existing (APS, ESRF) systems mitigating any concerns