brookhaven national laboratory collider-accelerator department

15
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department FY06 Summary of Safety Feedback and Improvement Sessions Ed Lessard February 13, 2006

Upload: abena

Post on 19-Jan-2016

40 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department. FY06 Summary of Safety Feedback and Improvement Sessions Ed Lessard February 13, 2006. Safety Survey. 2004 Survey and Group Discussions: 17 managers 27 supervisors 88 workers 2006 Survey and Group Discussions: 20 managers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Collider-Accelerator Department

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Collider-Accelerator Department

FY06 Summary of Safety Feedback and Improvement Sessions

Ed LessardFebruary 13, 2006

FY06 Summary of Safety Feedback and Improvement Sessions

Ed LessardFebruary 13, 2006

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 2

Safety SurveySafety Survey

2004 Survey and Group Discussions:• 17 managers • 27 supervisors • 88 workers

2006 Survey and Group Discussions:• 20 managers• 42 supervisors • 232 workers

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 3

Survey ResultsSurvey Results

Technique delivers four levels of insight:1. The absolute answers yield important information2. Comparison among management, supervision and workers 3. Results can be compared over time to assess progress4. Results can be compared to those of other companies

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 4

Safety Model in Best-Safe CompaniesSafety Model in Best-Safe Companies

3 Root Factors (management commitment, line responsibility for injuries and worker involvement)

+3 Drivers (clear rules, competent ESH specialists

and comprehensive safety systems)=3 Outcomes (safe equipment and facilities, safe-

aware people and an excellent injury record)

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 5

Priority Individuals Give to Safety Priority Individuals Give to Safety

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 6

Priority People Think Others Give to SafetyPriority People Think Others Give to Safety

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 7

All Injuries Are Preventable All Injuries Are Preventable

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 8

Overall Involvement in Safety Activities Overall Involvement in Safety Activities

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 9

Observance of Safety RulesObservance of Safety Rules

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 10

Rating Facilities and Equipment Safety Rating Facilities and Equipment Safety

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 11

Rating of the Safety Organization Rating of the Safety Organization

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 12

Satisfaction with C-AD’s Safety Performance Satisfaction with C-AD’s Safety Performance

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 13

Where to Address Injury Reduction Where to Address Injury Reduction

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 14

ConclusionsConclusions

Safety performance is moving toward excellence Staff are satisfied with safety performance Safety organization excellent Worker involvement excellent Competent group of safety specialists approaches excellence Comprehensive safety systems approaches excellence Concerns associated with equipment and facilities Supervisors do not buy into ‘all injuries can be prevented’ Clearer rules and practices needed

Brookhaven Science AssociatesU.S. Department of Energy 15

RecommendationsRecommendations

Derek should continue to set zero injuries as the Department’s direction C-AD managers and supervisors must set this same demanding goal Supervisors must re-examine their belief about preventing all injuries Safety rules must be well communicated and confined to a small set Safety rules should be distinguished from good practices Regular post-job feedback sessions need to be implemented

• Involve managers, supervisors and workers