brm_ins
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
1/123
2-1Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Redefining Marketing Research
The American Marketing Association (AMA)
redefined Marketing Research as:
The function that links the consumer, the
customer, and public to the marketer
throughINFORMATION
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
2/123
2-2Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Used to identify anddefine marketopportunities andproblems
Generate, refine, andevaluate marketingperformance
Monitor marketing
performance
Improve understandingof marketing as aprocess
Information
Redefining Marketing Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
3/123
2-3Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Definition of Marketing Research
Marketing research is the systematic and objective
identification
collection
analysis
dissemination
and use of information
For the purpose of improving decision making related to the
identification and solution of problems and opportunities in marketing
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
4/123
2-4Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Market Research
Specifies the information necessary toaddress these issues
Manages and implements the data
collection process Analyzes the results
Communicates the findings and theirimplications
Helps managers use this information tomake decisions
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
5/123
2-5Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Classification of Marketing Research
Problem-Identification Research Research undertaken to help identify problems which are
not necessarily apparent on the surface and yet exist orare likely to arise in the future. Examples: market
potential, market share, image, market characteristics,sales analysis, forecasting, and trends research.
Problem-Solving Research Research undertaken to help solve specific marketing
problems. Examples: segmentation, product, pricing,promotion, and distribution research.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
6/123
2-6Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
A Classification of Marketing Research
Marketing Research
ProblemIdentification Research
Problem-SolvingResearch
Market Potential ResearchMarket Share Research
Market Characteristics ResearchSales Analysis ResearchForecasting ResearchBusiness Trends Research
Segmentation Research
Product Research
Pricing ResearchPromotion Research
Distribution Research
Fig.1.1
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
7/123
2-7Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Problem-Solving Research
Determine the basis ofsegmentation
Establish market potential and
responsiveness for varioussegments
Select target markets
Create lifestyle profiles:demography, media, and
product image characteristics
SEGMENTATIONRESEARCH
Test concept
Determine optimal productdesign
Package tests Product modification
Brand positioning andrepositioning
Test marketing
PRODUCTRESEARCH
Table
1.1
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
8/123
2-8Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Problem-Solving Research
Table 1.1
cont.
PRICING RESEARCH
Pricing policies
Importance of price in brandselection
Product line pricing
Price elasticity of demand
Initiating and responding to price
$ALE
PROMOTIONAL RESEARCH
Optimal promotional budget Sales promotion relationship
Optimal promotional mix
Copy decisions
Media decisions Creative advertising testing
Evaluation of advertisingeffectiveness
Claim substantiation
0.00% APR
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
9/123
2-9Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Problem-Solving Research
Table 1.1cont.
DISTRIBUTION RESEARCHDetermine
Types of distribution
Attitudes of channel members
Intensity of wholesale & resale coverage Channel margins
Location of retail and wholesale outlets
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
10/123
2-10Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Marketing Research Process
Step 1 : Problem Definition
Step 2 : Development of an Approach to the Problem
Step 3 : Research Design Formulation
Step 4 : Fieldwork or Data Collection
Step 5 : Data Preparation and Analysis
Step 6 : Report Preparation and Presentation
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
11/123
2-11Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Marketing Research Process
Step 1: Defining the Problem
Step 2: Developing an Approach to the Problem
Step 3: Formulating a Research Design
Step 4: Doing Field Work or Collecting Data
Step 5: Preparing and Analyzing Data
Step 6: Preparing and Presenting the Report
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
12/123
2-12Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
The Role of Marketing Research
Controllable
Marketing
Product
Pricing
Promotion
Distribution
Variables
Marketing
Research
Marketing
DecisionMaking
Providing
Information
Assessing
Information
Needs
Marketing Managers
Market Segmentation
Performance & Control
Target Market Selection
Marketing Programs
Uncontrollable
Environmental
Factors
Economy
Technology Laws &
Regulations
Social & CulturalFactors
Political Factors
Fig.1.2 Consumers
Employees Shareholders Suppliers
Customer Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
13/123
2-13Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Client
Needs Find Seek Plan Act
Solve Problem
Achieve Goal
How WeHelp
ClarifyDecisions
Research
Analysis
EvaluateInterpretFacilitate
Recommend
MarketPlan
Research
AdviseAssistExecution
Opportunity scan
Option generation
Refine options
Decision
Fig. 1.3
Power Decisions Methodology
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
14/123
2-14Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Marketing Research Suppliers & Services
LIMITEDSERVICE
OtherServices
Technicaland AnalyticalServices
Focus Groupsand QualitativeServices
FieldServices
FULLSERVICE
SyndicateServices
StandardizedServices
CustomizedServices
InternetServices
RESEARCHSUPPLIERS EXTE
RNAL
INTERNAL
Fig.1.4
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
15/123
2-15Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
U.S. Rank Organization Headquarters Website U.S. Global Non-U.S.2007
2006
Table 1.2 Top 50 U.S. Marketing ResearchFirms1 1 The Nielsen Co. New York nielsen.com $2,173.0 $4,220.0 48.5%
2 2 IMS Health Inc. Norwalk, Conn. imshealth.com 801.0 2,192.6 63.5
3 3 Kantar Group* Fairfield, Conn. kantargroup.com 526.8 1,551.4 66.0
4 5 Westat Inc. Rockville, MD westat.com 467.8 467.8
5 4 IRI Chicago infores.com 441.0 702.0 37.2
6 6 TNS U.S. New York tnsglobal.com 379.8 2,137.2 82.2
7 7 Arbitron Inc. New York arbitron.com 338.5 352.1 3.9
8 8 GfK AG USA Nuremberg, Germany gfk.com 319.7 1,603.00 80.1
9 9 Ipsos New York ipsos-na.com 281.2 1,270.30 77.9
10 10 Synovate London synovate.com 250.4 867.0 71.1
11 11 Maritz Research Fenton, Mo. maritzresearch.com 187.4 223.3 16.1
12 13 J.D. Power and Associates* Westlake Village, Calif. jdpower.com 184.5 260.5 29.2
13 12 Harris Interactive Inc. Rochester, N.Y. harrisinteractive.com 161.0 227.0 29.1
14 14 The NPD Group Inc. Port Washington, N.Y. npd.com 160.4 211.1 24.0
15 Opinion Research/
Guideline Group Omaha, Neb. infousa.com 124.7 206.7 39.7
15 Opinion Research Corp. Princeton, N.J. opinionresearch.com 97.5 179.5 45.7
a e
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
16/123
2-16Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
U.S. Rank Organization Headquarters Website U.S. Global Non-U.S.2007 2006
a e . . .(Cont)
38Guideline Inc. New York guideline.com 26.8 26.8
16 18 comScore Inc. Reston, Va. comscore.com 77.0 87.2 11.7
17 20 Market Strategies Inc. Livonia, Mich. marketstrategies.com 75.7 80.4 5.8
20Market Strategies Inc. Livonia, Mich. markestrategies.com 53.4 58.1 8.1
37Flake-Wilkerson Market Insights Little Rock, Ark. fw-mi.com 22.3 22.3
18 17 Lieberman Research Worldwide Los Angeles Irwonline.com 71.0 87.4 18.8
19 Abt Associates Inc. Cambridge, Mass. abtassociates.com 55.1 55.1
19
Abt Associates Inc. Cambridge, Mass. abtassociates.com 33.0 33.0
41Abt SRBI Inc. New York srbi.com 22.1 22.1
20 23 OTX Los Angeles otxresearch.com 50.8 54.5 6.8
21 21 Burke Inc. Cincinnati burke.com 47.0 53.1 11.5
22 22 MVL Group Inc. Jupiter, Fla. mvlgroup.com 42.3 42.3
23 26 Knowledge Networks Inc. Menlo Park, Calif. knowledgenetworks.com 37.3 37.3
23 25 National Research Corp. Lincoln, Neb. nationalresearch.com 37.3 41.3 9.7
25 24 Directions Research Inc. Cincinnati directionsresearch.com 37.2 37.2
26 40 Phoenix Marketing International Rhineback, N.Y. phoenixmi.com 33.5 34.9 4.0
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
17/123
2-17Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
U.S. Rank Organization Headquarters Website U.S. Global Non-U.S.2007
2006
Table 1.2Top 50 U.S. Marketing Research Firms(Cont)
27 34 Lieberman Research Group Great Neck, N.Y. liebermanresearch.com 30.1 30.1
28 27 ICR/Int'l Communications Research Media, Pa. icrsurvey.com 28.8 29.7 3.0
29 28 Morpace Inc. Farmington Hills, Mich. morpace.com 28.7 33.2 13.6
30 33 MarketCast Los Angeles marketcastonline.com 25.1 25.1
31 36 Data Development Worldwide New York datadw.com 25.0 25.3 1.2
32 39 C&R Research Services Inc. Chicago crresearch.com 23.6 23.6
33 32 Informa Research Services Inc. Calabasas, Calif. informars.com 23.5 23.5
34 31 National Analysts Worldwide Philadelphia nationalanalysts.com 23.3 23.3
35 44 Service Management Group Kansas City, Mo. servicemanagement.com 22.4 23.0 2.6
36 34 Market Probe Inc. Milwaukee marketprobe.com 21.7 41.4 47.6
37 Hitwise New York hitwise.com 21.6 49.9 56.7
38 42 Walker Information Indianapolis walkerinfo.com 21.2 25.5 16.9
39 43 KS&R Inc. Syracuse, N.Y. ksrinc.com 17.1 21.0 18.6
40 47 Bellomy Research Inc. Winston-Salem, N.C. bellomyresearch.com 16.7 16.7
41 46 MarketVision Research Inc. Cincinnati marketvisionresearch.com 16.4 16.4
42 28 Public Opinion Strategies Alexandra, Va. pos.org 15.5 15.5
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
18/123
2-18Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
U.S. Rank Organization Headquarters Website U.S. GlobalNon-U.S.2007
2006
Table 1.2Top 50 U.S. Marketing Research Firms(Cont)
43 Compete Inc. Boston compete.com 14.9 14.9
44 45 Savitz Research Companies Dallas savitzresearch.com 14.8 14.8
45 48 RDA Group Inc.Bloomfield Hills,
Mich. rdagroup.com 13.7 16.8 18.5
46 Gongos Research Inc. Auburn Hills, Mich. gongos.com 13.3 13.3
47 Q Research Solutions Inc. Old Bridge, N.J. whoisq.com 13.0 13.2 1.5
48 49 Marketing Analysts Inc. Charleston, S.C. marketinganalysts.com 12.8 13.6 5.9
49 50RTi Market Research & Brand
Strategy Stamford, Conn. rtiresearch.com 12.2 12.2
50 The Link Group Atlanta the-link-group.com 11.9 13.3 10.5
Total $7.828.7 $17,638.0 55.6%
All other (150 CASRO companies notincluded in the Top 50) $774.3 $870.1 11.0%
Total (200 companies) $8,603.0 $18,508.1 53.5%
*Estimated by Top 50. U.S. and worldwide revenue may include nonresearch activities for some companies that are significantly higher.Rate of growth from year to year has been adjusted so as not to include revenue gains or losses from acquisitions or divestitures. Total
revenue of 150 survey research companies that provide financial information on a confidential basis to CASRO.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
19/123
2-19Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Selected Marketing Research Career Descriptions
Vice President of Marketing Research:The senior position inmarketing research. The vice president (VP) is responsible for theentire marketing research operation of the company and serves on thetop management team. This person sets the objectives and goals ofthe marketing research department.
Research Director:Also a senior position. The research director hasthe general responsibility for the development and execution of all themarketing research projects.
Assistant Director of Research:Serves as an administrativeassistant to the director and supervises some of the other marketingresearch staff members.
(Senior) Project Manager:Has overall responsibility for design,implementation, and management of research projects.
Statistician/Data Processing Specialist:Serves as an expert ontheory and application of statistical techniques. Responsibilities includeexperimental design, data processing, and analysis.
Fig.
1.5
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
20/123
2-20Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Selected Marketing Research Career Descriptions
Vice President of MarketingResearch
Part of companys top management team
Directs companys entire market research
operation
Sets the goals & objectives of the
marketing research department
Research Director
Also part of seniormanagement
Heads the development andexecution of all researchprojects
Assistant Director of Research
Administrative assistant to director
Supervises research staff members
Senior Project Manager Responsible for design, implementation, & research
projects
Fig. 1.5cont.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
21/123
2-21Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Analyst Handles details in execution of project Designs & pretests questionnaires Conducts preliminary analysis of data
Junior Analyst Secondary data analysis Edits and codes questionnaires Conducts preliminary analysis of data
Fieldwork Director Handles selection, training, supervision,and evaluation of interviewers and fieldworkers
Senior Analyst Participates in the development of projects Carries out execution of assigned projects Coordinates the efforts of analyst, junior analyst, & other personnel in the development
of research design and data collection Prepares final report
Fig. 1.5cont.
Statistician/Data Processing Serves as expert on theory and
application on statistical techniques Oversees experimental design, data
processing, and analysis
Selected Marketing Research CareerDescriptions
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
22/123
2-22Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Marketing Research Suppliers & Services
Internal suppliers
External suppliers Full-service suppliers
Syndicated services Standardized services
Customized services Internet services Limited-service suppliers
Field services Focus groups and qualitative services
Technical and analytical services Other services
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
23/123
2-23Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Criteria for Selecting a Research Supplier
What is the reputation of the supplier? Do they complete projects on schedule? Are they known for maintaining ethical standards? Are they flexible? Are their research projects of high quality? What kind and how much experience does the supplier
have? Has the firm had experience with projects similarto this one?
Do the supplier's personnel have both technical andnon-technical expertise?
Can they communicate well with the client?
Competitive bids should be compared on the basis ofquality as well as price.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
24/123
2-24Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
The Department Store Project
The following information was solicited:1. Familiarity with the ten department stores2. Frequency with which household members shopped at eachof the ten stores
3. Relative importance attached to each of the eight factors of
the choice criteria4. Evaluation of the ten stores on each of the eight factors ofthe choice criteria
5. Preference ratings for each store
6. Rankings of the ten stores (from most preferred to least
preferred)7. Degree of agreement with 21 lifestyle statements
8. Standard demographic characteristics (age, education, etc.)
9. Name, address, and telephone number
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
25/123
2-25Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Domestic
AAPOR : American Association for Public Opinion Research(www.aapor.org)
AMA : American Marketing Association (www.ama.org)
ARF : The Advertising Research Foundation
(www.amic.com/arf)CASRO : The Council of American Survey ResearchOrganizations (www.casro.org)
MRA : Marketing Research Association (www.mra-
net.org)QRCA : Qualitative Research Consultants Association
(www.qrca.org)
RIC : Research Industry Coalition
(www.researchindustry.org)
Marketing Research Associations Online
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
26/123
2-26Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
International
ESOMAR:European Society for Opinion and MarketingResearch (www.esomar.nl)
MRS: The Market Research Society (UK)(www.marketresearch.org.uk)
MRSA: The Market Research Society ofAustralia (www.mrsa.com.au)
PMRS: The Professional Marketing Research Society(Canada) (www.pmrs-aprm.com)
Marketing Research Associations Online
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
27/123
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
28/123
2-28Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Overview of Ethical Issues in Marketing Research (Cont.)
Table 1.3 cont.
III Research Design- Formulating a research design more suited to the researcher's
rather than the client's needs- Using secondary data that are not applicable or have been
gathered through questionable means- Disguising the purpose of the research- Soliciting unfair concessions from the researcher- Not maintaining anonymity of respondents- Disrespecting privacy of respondents- Misleading respondents
- Disguising observation of respondents- Embarrassing or putting stress on respondents- Using measurement scales of questionable reliability & validity- Designing overly long/sensitive questionnaires- Using inappropriate sampling procedures and sample size
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
29/123
2-29Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Overview of Ethical Issues in Marketing Research
Table 1.3 cont.
IV Field Work- Increasing dis comfort level of respondents- Following un acceptable field work procedures
V Data Preparation and Analysis- Identifying and discarding unsatisfactory respo ndents- Using statistical techniques when the underlying
assumptions are violated- Interpreting the results and making incorrect
conclusions and recommendations
VI Report Preparation and Presentation- Incomplete reporting- Biased reporting- Inaccur ate reporting
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
30/123
2-30Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
31/123
2-31Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Chain Restaurant Study
One day I received a phonecall from a research analystwho introduced himself asone of our alumni.
He was working for arestaurant chain in townand wanted help analyzingthe data he had collectedwhile conducting a
marketing research study.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
32/123
2-32Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Chain Restaurant Study
When we met, he presented me with a copy of the
questionnaire and asked how he should analyze thedata. My first question to him was,
What is the problem being
addressed?
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
33/123
2-33Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Chain Restaurant Study
When he lookedperplexed, Iexplained that dataanalysis is not anindependentexercise.
Rather, the goal of data analysis is toPROVIDEINFORMATION RELATED TO THE PROBLEMCOMPONENTS.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
34/123
2-34Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Chain Restaurant Study
I was surprised to learn that he did nothave a clear understanding of themarketing research problem and thata written definition did not exist. So
before going any further, I had todefine the marketing research
problem.
Once that was done, I found that much ofthe data collected was not relevant to the
problem. In this sense, the whole studywas a waste of resources. A new studyhad to be designed and implemented toaddress the problem defined.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
35/123
2-35Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
The Problem Definition Process
Fig.
2.1 DiscussionwithDecision Maker(s)
InterviewswithExperts
SecondaryDataAnalysis
QualitativeResearch
Management Decision Problem
Marketing Research Problem
Tasks Involved
Environmental Context of the Problem
Step I: Problem Definition
Step II: Approach to the Problem
Objective/TheoreticalFoundations
ResearchQuestions
Hypotheses
Step III: Research Design
AnalyticalModel: Verbal,Graphical,Mathematical
SpecificationofInformationNeeded
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
36/123
2-36Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Tasks Involved in Problem Definition
Discussions with DecisionMakers
Interviews with IndustryExperts
Secondary Data Analysis
Qualitative Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
37/123
2-37Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
The Problem Audit
The problem audit is a comprehensive examination of a
marketing problem with the purpose of understanding its originand nature.
1. The events that led to the decision that action is needed,
or the history of the problem
2. The alternative courses of action available to the DM
3. The criteria that will be used to evaluate the alternativecourses of action
4. The potential actions that are likely to be suggestedbased on the research findings
5. The information that is needed to answer the DM's
questions6. The manner in which the DM will use each item of
information in making the decision
7. The corporate culture as it relates to decision making
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
38/123
2-38Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
The Seven Cs of Interaction
The interaction between the DM and theresearcher should be characterized by theseven Cs:
1. Communication
2. Cooperation
3. Confidence4. Candor
5. Closeness
6. Continuity
7.
Creativity
Factors to be Considered in the
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
39/123
2-39Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Factors to be Considered in theEnvironmental Context of the Problem
PAST INFORMATION ANDFORECASTS
RESOURCES ANDCONSTRAINTS
OBJECTIVES
BUYER BEHAVIOR
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT
ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT
MARKETING ANDTECHNOLOGICAL SKILLS
Fig. 2.2
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
40/123
2-40Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Management Decision Problem Vs. Marketing Research Problem
Management Decision Problem Marketing Research Problem
Should a new product be To determine consumer preferences
introduced? and purchase intentions for the
proposed new product
Should the advertising To determine the effectivenesscampaign be changed? of the current advertising
campaign
Should the price of the To determine the price elasticity
brand be increased? of demand and the impact on salesand profits of various levels
of price changes
Proper Definition of the Research Problem
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
41/123
2-41Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Proper Definition of the Research Problem
Marketing Research Problem
Broad Statement
Specific Components
Fig.2.3
Department Store Project
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
42/123
2-42Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Department Store Project
Problem Definition
In the department store project, the marketing researchproblem is to determine the relative strengths andweaknesses of Sears, vis--vis other major competitors, withrespect to factors that influence store patronage. Specifically,research should provide information on the followingquestions.1. What criteria do households use when selecting department
stores?2. How do households evaluate Sears and competing stores interms of the choice criteria identified in question 1?3. Which stores are patronized when shopping for specific productcategories?4. What is the market share of Sears and its competitors for
specific product categories?5. What is the demographic and psychological profile of thecustomers of Sears? Does it differ from the profile of customersof competing stores?
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
43/123
2-43Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Components of an Approach
Objective/Theoretical Foundations
Analytical Model
Research Questions Hypotheses
Specification of the InformationNeeded
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
44/123
2-44Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
The Role of Theory in Applied Marketing Research
ResearchTask Role ofTheory 1. Conceptualizing
and identifying
keyvariables
Provides a conceptual foundation and understanding of the basic processes
underlying the problem situation. These processes will suggest key dependent
and independent variables.
2. Operationalizing
key
variables
Theoretical constructs (variables) can suggest independent and dependent
variables naturally occurring in the real world.
3. Selecting a
research design
Causal or associative relationships suggested by the theory may indicatewhether
a causal or descriptive design should be adopted.
4. Selecting a
sample
The theoretical framework may be useful in defining the population and
suggesting variables for qualifying respondents, imposing quotas, or stratifying
the
population
(see Chapter
11).
5. Analyzing and
interpreting data
The theoretical framework (and the models, research questions and hypotheses
based on it) guide the selection of a data analysis strategy and the interpretation
of results (see Chapter 14).
6. Integrating
findings
The findings obtained in the research project can be interpreted in the light of
previous research and integrated with the existing body of knowledge.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
45/123
2-45Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Models
An analytical model is a set of variablesand their interrelationships designed torepresent, in whole or in part, some realsystem or process.
In verbal models, the variables and theirrelationships are stated in prose form. Suchmodels may be mere restatements of themain tenets of a theory.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
46/123
2-46Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Graphical Models
Graphical models are visual. They are used to
isolate variables and to suggest directions ofrelationships but are not designed to provide
numerical results.
Awareness
Understanding:Evaluation
Preference
Patrona
ge
M th ti l M d l
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
47/123
2-47Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Mathematical Models
Mathematical modelsexplicitly specifythe relationships among variables, usually inequation form.
Where
y = degree of preference
= model parameters to be estimated
statistically
=+=
n
i ii xaay
10
aa i,0
Development of Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
48/123
2-48Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
pQuestions and Hypotheses
Fig.
2.4
Components of the
Research Questions
Hypotheses
Objective/TheoreticalFramework
AnalyticalModel
Marketing Research Problem
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
49/123
2-49Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Research Questions and Hypotheses
Research questions (RQs) arerefined statements of the specificcomponents of the problem.
A hypothesis (H) is an unprovenstatement or proposition about a factoror phenomenon that is of interest to theresearcher. Often, a hypothesis is a
possible answer to the research question.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
50/123
2-50Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Department Store Project
RQ: Do the customers of Sears exhibitstore loyalty?
H1: Customers who are store-loyal are
less knowledgeable about the shoppingenvironment.
H2: Store-loyal customers are more risk-averse than are non-loyal customers.
D t t St P j t
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
51/123
2-51Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Department Store Project
Specification of Information Needed
Component 1 The researcher identified the following factors as part of the
choice criteria: quality of merchandise, variety and assortmentof merchandise, returns and adjustment policy, service of store
personnel, prices, convenience of location, layout of store,credit and billing policies. The respondents should be asked torate the importance of each factor as it influences their storeselection.
Component 2 The researcher identified nine department stores as competitors
to Sears based on discussions with management. Therespondents should be asked to evaluate Sears and its ninecompetitors on the eight choice criteria factors.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
52/123
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
53/123
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline with
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
54/123
2-54Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
, gTravelers
United Airlines, as other major airlines, had to deal with
passenger loyalty (management decision problem: how toattract more and more loyal passengers). The broadmarketing research problem was to identify thefactors thatinfluence loyalty of airline travelers.
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline withl
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
55/123
2-55Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
The basic answer is to improve service. Exploratory research,
theoretical framework, and empirical evidence revealed thatthe consumers choice of an airline is influenced by: safety,
price of the ticket, frequent-flyer program, convenience ofscheduling, and brand name.
Travelers
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline with
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
56/123
2-56Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
A graphical model stipulated that consumersevaluate competing airlines based on factors ofthe choice criteria to select a preferred airline.The problem was that major airlines were quite
similar on these factors. Indeed, "airlines offerthe same schedules, the same service, and thesame fares. Consequently, United Airlineshad to find a way to differentiate itself. Foodturned out to be the solution.
, gTravelers
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
57/123
2-57Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Secondary data, like the J. D Power & Associates' survey
on "current and future trends in the airline food industry,"indicated that "food service is a major contributor tocustomers loyalty." This survey also emphasized theimportance of food brands.
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airlinewith Travelers
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
58/123
2-58
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
The airline's Marketrak survey told United Airlinesthat "customers wanted more varied and up-to-date food.
The following research questions and hypotheses
may be posed.RQ1 How important is food for airline customers?
H1: Food is an important factor for airlinetravelers.
H2: Travelers value branded food.
H3: Travelers prefer larger food portions, but withconsistent quality.
H4: Travelers prefer exotic food.
with Travelers
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
59/123
2-59
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Characteristics that influence the research design included
the identification of competing airlines (Delta, American,etc.), factors of the choice criteria (already identified),measurement of airline travel, and loyalty.
with Travelers
At United, Food Is Uniting the Airline
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
60/123
2-60Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
This kind of research helped United Airlines define their marketing
research problem and develop the approach. Focus groups and surveyswere conducted to check customers' perceptions of food in United Airlines'aircraft. The results provided support for all the hypotheses (H1 to H4).United Airlines then made a few changes: new "culinary menus," larger
portions of food, new coffee, and branded products (e.g., Godivachocolates). This resulted in better service, increasing customer satisfactionand fostering loyalty.
with Travelers
l k h h
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
61/123
2-61Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
International Marketing Research Examining the Impactof the Self-Reference Criterion (SRC)
1. Define the marketing research problem in
terms of domestic environmental and culturalfactors.
2. Define the marketing research problem interms of foreign environmental and cultural
factors. Make no judgments.3. Isolate the self-reference criterion (SRC)
influence on the problem and examine itcarefully to see how it complicates the
problem.4. Redefine the problem without the SRC
influence and address it for the foreign marketsituation.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
62/123
2-62Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
63/123
2-63Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
R h D i D fi iti
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
64/123
2-64Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Research Design: Definition
A research design is a framework or
blueprint for conducting the marketing
research project. It details the proceduresnecessary for obtaining the information
needed to structure or solve marketing
research problems.
A Classification of Marketing Research Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
65/123
2-65Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
g g
Single Cross-Sectional
Design
Multiple Cross-Sectional
Design
Fig.3.1
Research Design
ConclusiveResearchDesign
ExploratoryResearch
Design DescriptiveResearch
CausalResearch
Cross-Sectional
Design
Longitudinal
Design
Differences
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
66/123
2-66Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Differences
Objective:
Character-istics:
Findings/Results:
Outcome:
To provide insights andunderstanding
Information needed is defined onlyloosely. Research process is flexibleand unstructured. Sample is small
and non-representative. Analysis ofprimary data is qualitative
Tentative
Generally followed by furtherexploratory or conclusive research
To test specific hypotheses and examinerelationships
Information needed is clearly defined.Research process is formal andstructured. Sample is large and
representative. Data analysis isquantitative
Conclusive
Findings used as input into decisionmaking
Exploratory ConclusiveTable
3.1
A Comparison o Basic Researc Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
67/123
2-67Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Objective:
Characteristics:
Methods:
Discovery of ideas
and insights
Flexible, versatile
Often the front end oftotal research design
Expert surveysPilot surveysCase studiesSecondary data:qualitative analysisqualitative research
Describe market
characteristics orfunctions
Marked by the priorformulation of specifichypotheses
Preplanned and structureddesign
Secondary data:quantitative analysisSurveysPanelsObservation and otherdata
Determine cause
and effectrelationships
Manipulation ofindependentvariables, effect on
dependent variables
Control mediatingvariables
Experiments
Exploratory
Descriptive
Causal
Table3.2
U f E l t R h
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
68/123
2-68Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Uses of Exploratory Research
Formulate a problem or define a problemmore precisely
Identify alternative courses of action
Develop hypotheses Isolate key variables and relationships for
further examination
Gain insights for developing an approach
to the problem Establish priorities for further research
Methods of Exploratory Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
69/123
2-69Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Methods of Exploratory Research
Survey of experts (discussed in Chapter 2)
Pilot surveys (discussed in Chapter 2)
Secondary data analyzed in a qualitative way
(discussed in Chapter 4)
Qualitative research (discussed in Chapter 5)
Use of Descriptive Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
70/123
2-70Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Use of Descriptive Research
To describe the characteristics of relevantgroups, such as consumers, salespeople,organizations, or market areas
To estimate the percentage of units in aspecified population exhibiting a certainbehavior
To determine the perceptions of productcharacteristics
To determine the degree to which marketingvariables are associated
To make specific predictions
Methods of Descriptive Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
71/123
2-71Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Methods of Descriptive Research
Secondary data analyzed in a quantitative, asopposed to a qualitative, manner (discussed inChapter 4)
Surveys (Chapter 6) Panels (Chapters 4 and 6)
Observational and other data (Chapter 6)
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
72/123
Consumption of Various Soft Drinks byVarious Age Cohorts
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
73/123
2-73Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Various Age Cohorts
8-1920-29
30-3940-4950+
Age 1960 1969 19791950
52.945.2
33.923.218.1
62.660.7
46.640.828.8C1
73.276.0
67.758.650.0C2
81.075.8
71.467.851.9C3
C
8C7C6C5C4
C1: cohort born prior to 1900C2: cohort born 1901-10C3: cohort born 1911-20C4: cohort born 1921-30
C5: cohort born 1931-40C6: cohort born 1940-49C7: cohort born 1950-59C8: cohort born 1960-69
Table
3.3 Percentage consuming on a typical day
Longitudinal Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
74/123
2-74Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Longitudinal Designs
A fixed sample (or samples) of populationelements is measured repeatedly on thesame variables
A longitudinal design differs from a cross-sectional design in that the sample orsamples remain the same over time
Cross-Sectional vs. Longitudinal
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
75/123
2-75Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2007Prentice Hall
Cross Sectional vs. Longitudinal
SampleSurveyed at T1
SampleSurveyedat T1
SameSamplealso
Surveyedat T2
T1 T2
Cross-Sectional Design
Longitudinal Design
Time
Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
76/123
2-76Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
EvaluationCriteria
Cross-SectionalDesign
LongitudinalDesign
Detecting ChangeLarge amount of data collectionAccuracyRepresentative SamplingResponse bias
---++
+++--
Note: A + indicates a relative advantage over the other design,whereas a - indicates a relative disadvantage.
Table
3.4
C S ti l D t M N t Sh Ch
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
77/123
2-77Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Cross-Sectional Data May Not Show Change
Brand Purchased Time Period
Period 1 Period 2Survey Survey
Brand A 200 200Brand B 300 300Brand C 500 500Total 1000 1000
Table3.5
Longitudinal Data May Show Substantial Change
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
78/123
2-78Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
BrandPurchased inPeriod 1
Brand Purchased in Period 2
Brand A Brand B Brand C Total
Brand A
Brand BBrand CTotal
100
2575
200
50
100150300
50
175275500
200
3005001000
Table
3.6
Uses of Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
79/123
2-79Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Uses of Causal Research
To understand which variables are the cause(independent variables) and which variablesare the effect (dependent variables) of aphenomenon
To determine the nature of the relationshipbetween the causal variables and the effect tobe predicted
METHOD: Experiments
Alternative Research Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
80/123
2-80Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Exploratory
Research Secondary DataAnalysisFocus Groups
ConclusiveResearchDescriptive/Causal
Conclusive
ResearchDescriptive/Causal
ExploratoryResearch
Secondary DataAnalysis
Focus Groups
ConclusiveResearchDescriptive/Causal
(a)
(b)
(c)
Potential Sources of Error in Research Designs
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
81/123
2-81Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Surrogate Information Error
Measurement Error
Population Definition Error
Sampling Frame Error
Data Analysis Error
Respondent Selection Error
Questioning Error
Recording Error
Cheating Error
Inability Error
Unwillingness Error
Fig.
3.2
Total Error
Non-samplingError
RandomSampling Error
Non-responseError
ResponseError
InterviewerError
RespondentError
ResearcherError
Errors in Marketing Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
82/123
2-82Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Errors in Marketing Research
The total error is the variation between the true
mean value in the population of the variable ofinterest and the observed mean value obtained inthe marketing research project.
Random sampling error is the variation betweenthe true mean value for the population and the truemean value for the original sample.
Non-sampling errors can be attributed to sourcesother than sampling, and they may be random ornonrandom: including errors in problem definition,
approach, scales, questionnaire design, interviewingmethods, and data preparation and analysis. Non-sampling errors consist of non-response errors andresponse errors.
Errors in Marketing Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
83/123
2-83Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Non-response error arises when someof the respondents included in thesample do not respond.
Response error arises whenrespondents give inaccurate answers ortheir answers are misrecorded ormisanalyzed.
,Descriptive, and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
84/123
2-84Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Marketing Research at Citicorpis typical in that it isused to measure consumer awareness of products,monitor their satisfaction and attitudes associatedwith the product, track product usage and diagnose
problems as they occur. To accomplish these tasksCiticorp makes extensive use of exploratory,descriptive, and causal research. Often it isadvantageous to offer special financial packages tospecific groups of customers. In this case, a
financial package is being designed for seniorcitizens.
The following seven-step process was taken by
marketing research to help in the design.
t corp Ban s on Exp oratory,Descriptive, and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
85/123
2-85Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
p ,
1) A taskforce was created to better define the market parametersto include all the needs of the many Citicorp branches. A finaldecision was made to include Americans 55 years of age orolder, retired, and in the upper half of the financial strata of thatmarket.
Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,Descriptive and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
86/123
2-86Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
2) Exploratory research in the form of secondary data analysis of the matureor older market was then performed and a study of competitive products wasconducted. Exploratory qualitative research involving focus groups was alsocarried out in order to determine the needs and desires of the market and thelevel of satisfaction with the current products.
In the case of senior citizens, agreat deal of diversity was foundin the market. This was
determined to be due to suchfactors as affluence, relative age,and the absence or presence of aspouse.
Descriptive, and Causal Research
t corp Ban s on Exp oratory,Descriptive, and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
87/123
2-87Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
3) The next stage of research was brainstorming. This involved theformation of many different financial packages aimed at the targetmarket. In this case, a total of 10 ideas were generated.
p ,
Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,Descriptive and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
88/123
2-88Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
4) The feasibility of the 10 ideas generated in step 3 was then tested.
The ideas were tested on the basis of whether they were possible inrelation to the business. The following list of questions was used as aseries of hurdles that the ideas had to pass to continue on to the nextstep.
Can the idea be explained in a manner that the targetmarket will easily understand? Does the idea fit into the overall strategy of Citicorp?
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,Descriptive and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
89/123
2-89Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Is there an available description of a specific target market for theproposed product?
Does the research conducted so far indicate a potential match fortarget market needs, and is the idea perceived to have appeal tothis market?
Is there a feasible outline of the tactics and strategies forimplementing the program?
Have the financial impact and cost of the program beenthoroughly evaluated and determined to be in line with companypractices?
In this study, only one idea generated from the brainstormingsession made it past all the listed hurdles and on to step 5.
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,Descriptive and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
90/123
2-90Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
5) A creative work-plan was then generated. This plan was to emphasizethe competitive advantage of the proposed product as well as better
delineate the specific features of the product.
6) The previous exploratory research was now followed up with
descriptive research in the form of mall intercept surveys of people in
the target market range. The survey showed that the list of special
features was too long and it was decided to drop the features more
commonly offered by competitors.
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Citicorp Banks on Exploratory,Descriptive and Causal Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
91/123
2-91Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
7) Finally, the product was test marketed in six of theCiticorp branches within the target market. Testmarketing is a form of causal research. Givensuccessful test marketing results, the product is
introduced nationally.
Descriptive, and Causal Research
Marketing Research Proposal
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
92/123
2-92Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
g p
Executive Summary Background Problem Definition/Objectives of the
Research Approach to the Problem Research Design Fieldwork/Data Collection Data Analysis Reporting Cost and Time Appendices
The Greenfield of Online Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
93/123
2-93Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
The Greenfield of Online Research
Greenfield Online Research Center, Inc.(http://www.greenfieldonline.com), based inWestport, Connecticut, is a subsidiary of theGreenfield Consulting Group. The Online
Research Center conducts focus groups, surveys,and polls over the Internet. The company hasbuilt up a panel of several thousand Internetusers, from which it draws survey samples. Thesamples may be used for descriptive research
designs like single or multiple cross-sectionaldesigns, as well as longitudinal designs. Causaldesigns can also be implemented. Respondentsmay also be chosen from the registered Internetusers.
The Greenfield of Online Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
94/123
2-94Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Internet users wishing to take part in surveys andother projects begin by registering online at thecompanys Web site. The registration consists of asign-up survey that asks for e-mail address, typeof computer used, personal interests and informationabout the respondents household. Once an Internetuser is registered, Greenfield Online matches theuser with research studies that are well-suited to hisor her interests.
Incentives to take part in focus groups or special
surveys are offered by the companies whoseproducts or services are being researched. Thisincentive is cash or valuable prizes. Incentives arealso offered to Internet users to encourage them toregister with Greenfields Internet panel. New
registrants automatically qualify for prizes that are
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
95/123
2-95Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
96/123
A Comparison of Primary & Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
97/123
2-97Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
p y y
Primary Data Secondary Data
Collection purpose For the problem at hand For other problemsCollection process Very involved Rapid & easyCollection cost High Relatively lowCollection time Long Short
Table 4.1
Uses of Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
98/123
2-98Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Identify the problem Better define the problem Develop an approach to the problem
Formulate an appropriate research design (forexample, by identifying the key variables) Answer certain research questions and test some
hypotheses
Interpret primary data more insightfully
Criteria for Evaluating Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
99/123
2-99Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Specifications: Methodology Used to Collectthe Data Error: Accuracy of the Data Currency: When the Data Were Collected
Objective(s): The Purpose for Which the DataWere Collected Nature: The Content of the Data Dependability: Overall, How Dependable Are
the Data
Criteria for Evaluating Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
100/123
2-100Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Criteria Issues Remarks
Specifications &Methodology
Error & Accuracy
Currency
Objective
Nature
Dependability
Data collection method, response rate,quality & analysis of data, samplingtechnique & size, questionnaire design,fieldwork.Examine errors in approach,research design, sampling, data
collection & analysis, & reporting.
Time lag between collection &publication, frequency of updates.Why were the data collected?
Definition of key variables, units of
measurement, categories used,relationships examined.Expertise, credibility, reputation, andtrustworthiness of the source.
Data should be reliable, valid,& generalizable to theproblem.
Assess accuracy by comparingdata from different sources.
Census data are updated bysyndicated firms.The objective determines therelevance of data.Reconfigure the data toincrease their usefulness.
Data should be obtained froman original source.
Table 4.2
A Classification of Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
101/123
2-101Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Secondary Data
Ready toUse
RequiresFurtherProcessing
PublishedMaterials
ComputerizedDatabases
SyndicatedServices
Fig. 4.1
Internal External
Internal Secondary Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
102/123
2-102Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
Department Store Project
Sales were analyzed to obtain: Sales by product line Sales by major department (e.g., men's
wear, house wares)
Sales by specific stores Sales by geographical region Sales by cash versus credit purchases Sales in specific time periods
Sales by size of purchase Sales trends in many of these classificationswere also examined
Type of Individual/Household Level DataAvailable from Syndicated Firms
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
103/123
2-103Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
y
I. Demographic Data
- Identification (name, address, email,telephone)
- Sex
- Marital status
- Names of family members
- Age (including ages of family members)- Income
- Occupation
- Number of children present
- Home ownership
- Length of residence
- Number and make of cars owned
Type of Individual/Household Level DataAvailable from Syndicated Firms
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
104/123
2-104Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007Prentice Hall
II. Psychographic Lifestyle Data
- Interest in golf
- Interest in snow skiing
- Interest in book reading
- Interest in running
- Interest in bicycling
- Interest in pets
- Interest in fishing
- Interest in electronics
- Interest in cable televisionThere are also firms such as Dun & Bradstreet and American BusinessInformation which collect demographic data on businesses.
A Classification of Marketing Research Data
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
105/123
2-105Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
g
SurveyData
Observationaland Other Data
ExperimentalData
Fig.5.1
Qualitative Data Quantitative Data
Descriptive Causal
Marketing Research Data
Secondary Data Primary Data
Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Research
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
106/123
2-106Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Qualitative Research
To gain a qualitativeunderstanding of theunderlying reasons andmotivations
Small number of non-representative cases
Unstructured
Non-statistical
Develop an initial
understanding
Objective
Sample
DataCollection
Data Analysis
Outcome
Quantitative Research
To quantify the data andgeneralize the results fromthe sample to the
population of interest
Large number ofrepresentative cases
Structured
Statistical
Recommend a final course
of action
Table5.1
A Classification of Qualitative ResearchProcedures
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
107/123
2-107Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Association
Technique
s
Completion
Technique
s
ConstructionTechniques
ExpressiveTechnique
s
Fig.5.2
Direct (Non-disguised)
Indirect(Disguised)
Focus
Groups
DepthInterviews
ProjectiveTechniques
Qualitative Research
Procedures
Characteristics of Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
108/123
2-108Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Group Size 8-12
Group Composition Homogeneous, respondents,prescreened
Physical Setting Relaxed, informal atmosphere
Time Duration 1-3 hours
Recording Use of audiocassettes andvideotapes
Moderator Observational, interpersonal, andcommunication skills of the moderator
Table5.2
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
109/123
2-109Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Baltimore Research: Facility Overview.Source http://www.baltimoreresearch.com/marketing_research_facility.php?sPage=Facility
One-way mirror
http://www.baltimoreresearch.com/marketing_research_facility.php?sPage=Facilityhttp://www.baltimoreresearch.com/marketing_research_facility.php?sPage=Facility -
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
110/123
2-110Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Layout of focus group room andviewing room
Viewing room looking into the focus group roomthrough one-way mirror
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
111/123
2-111Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.
Source:
www.campos.com/focusgs.htm
Key Qualifications of Focus Group Moderators
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
112/123
2-112Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
y Q p
1. Kindness with firmness: The moderator mustcombine a disciplined detachment withunderstanding empathy so as to generate thenecessary interaction.
2. Permissiveness: The moderator must be
permissive yet alert to signs that the groupscordiality or purpose is disintegrating.
3. Involvement: The moderator must encourage andstimulate intense personal involvement.
4. Incomplete understanding: The moderator mustencourage respondents to be more specific aboutgeneralized comments by exhibiting incompleteunderstanding.
Key Qualifications of Focus Group Moderators
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
113/123
2-113Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
y Q p
5. Encouragement: The moderator mustencourage unresponsive members toparticipate.
6. Flexibility: The moderator must be able toimprovise and alter the planned outline amidthe distractions of the group process.
7. Sensitivity: The moderator must be sensitive
enough to guide the group discussion at anintellectual as well as emotional level.
roce ure or ann ng an on uc ng ocusGroups
Fi
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
114/123
2-114Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Fig.5.3
Determine the Objectives and Define the Problem
Specify the Objectives of QualitativeResearch
Develop a Moderators Outline
Conduct the Focus Group Interviews
Review Tapes and Analyze the Data
Summarize the Findings and Plan Follow-Up Research orAction
State the Objectives/Questions to be Answered by FocusGroups
Write a Screening Questionnaire
Variations in Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
115/123
2-115Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Two-way focus group. This allows one targetgroup to listen to and learn from a related group.
For example, a focus group of physicians vieweda focus group of arthritis patients discussing thetreatment they desired.
Dual-moderator group. A focus groupconducted by two moderators: One moderator isresponsible for the smooth flow of the session,and the other ensures that specific issues arediscussed.
Dueling-moderator group. There are twomoderators, but they deliberately take oppositepositions on the issues to be discussed.
Variations in Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
116/123
2-116Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Respondent-moderator group. Themoderator asks selected participants to play therole of moderator temporarily to improve groupdynamics.
Client-participant groups. Client personnelare identified and made part of the discussion
group. Mini groups. These groups consist of a
moderator and only 4 or 5 respondents. Telesession groups. Focus group sessions by
phone using the conference call technique. Online focus groups. Focus groups conducted
online over the Internet.
Advantages of Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
117/123
2-117Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
1. Synergism
2. Snowballing3. Stimulation
4. Security
5. Spontaneity
6. Serendipity7. Specialization
8. Scientific scrutiny
9. Structure
10. Speed
Disadvantages of Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
118/123
2-118Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
1. Misuse
2. Misjudge
3. Moderation
4. Messy5. Misrepresentation
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
119/123
2-119Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Table
5.3Characteristic Online Focus Groups Traditional Focus Groups
Group size 4-6 8-12
Group composition Anywhere in the world Drawn from the local area
Time duration 1-1.5 hours 1-3 hours
Physical setting Researcher has little control Under the control of the researcher
Respondent identity Difficult to verify Can be easily verified
Respondent attentiveness Respondents can engage in other tasks Attentiveness can be monitored
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
120/123
2-120Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Table 5.3,
cont.Respondent recruiting Easier. Can be recruited online, e-mail, Recruited by traditional meanspanel, or by traditional means (telephone, mail, mail panel)
Group dynamics Limited Synergistic, snowballing(bandwagon) effect
Openness of respondents Respondents are more candid Respondents are candid, except for due to lack of face-to-face contact sensitive topics
Nonverbal communication Body language cannot be observed. Body language and emotionsEmotions expressed by using symbols observed
Use of physical stimuli Limited to those that can be displayed A variety of stimuli (products,on the Internet advertising demonstrations, etc.) can be used
Online Versus Traditional Focus Groups
Table 5 3
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
121/123
2-121Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Table 5.3,cont.Transcripts Available immediately Time consuming and expensive to
obtain
Observers communication Observers can communicate with the Observers can manually send noteswith moderator the moderator on a split-screen to the focus group room
Unique moderator skills Typing, computer usage, familiarity Observationalwith chat room slang
Turnaround time Can be set up and completed Takes many days for setup andin a few days completion
Client travel costs None Can be expensive
Client Involvement Limited High
Basic focus group costs Much less expensive More expensive: facility rental,food, taping, transcript preparation
Advantages of Online Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
122/123
2-122Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 2007
Prentice Hall
Geographical constraints are removed and time
constraints are lessened. Unique opportunity to re-contact group
participants at a later date.
Can recruit people not interested in traditionalfocus groups: doctors, lawyers, etc.
Moderators can carry on side conversations withindividual respondents.
There is no travel, videotaping, or facilities toarrange so the cost is much lower.
Disadvantages of Online Focus Groups
-
7/30/2019 BRM_INS
123/123
Only people that have access to the Internet canparticipate.
Verifying that a respondent is a member of a targetgroup is difficult.
There is lack of general control over therespondent's environment.
Only audio and visual stimuli can be tested.
Products can not be touched (e.g., clothing) orsmelled (e.g., perfumes).