briefing: good faith obligations in nec contracts · briefing: good faith obligations in nec...

2
Brieng: Good faith obligations in NEC contracts 1 Terrence Davis BCom, LLB, HDip Tax, HDip Co Law (Wits), Qualied (The Law Society, England) Practising Attorney under the style LindsayKeller, Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa 2 Peter Newson Thurlow Pr Eng BSc (Eng) (Civil) Wits, MSAICE, MICE, MCMI, MAPM(SA), PMP(USA) Construction Procurement and Delivery Consultant, Montgomery Park, Johannesburg, South Africa 1 2 Many employers and contractors, as signatories to NEC contracts, and adjudicators misconstrue the importance and the effect of core clause 10.1, being of the misconception that this core clause, in so far as it relates to a spirit of mutual trustis merely an expression of good intent, without any binding effect. This paper analyses the meaning of the words a spirit of mutual trustand discusses the scope of the obligation, which core clause 10.1 imposes on the parties to the NEC contract. It identies the clause as a manifestation by the parties of an intention to create a legal relationship of trust with regard to the contractual rights and assets of one another; it equates the resultant duciary duties of the parties to those of a trustee of a trust, which are more onerous than a bare duty to act in good faith. 1. Introduction There is no general duty of good faith in English law, but this does not affect the NEC (NEC Engineering and Construction Contract [previously the New Engineering Contract]), because the duty of good faith is accepted by the parties in core clause 10.1 as governing their dealings concerning the project. 2. The NEC Core clause 10.1 provides: The Employer, the Contractor, the Project Manager and the Supervisor shall act as stated in this contract and in a spirit of mutual trust and co-operation.Core clause 10.1, which is at the heart of the NEC, imposes two obligations on the employer, the contractor, the project manager and the supervisor (the parties): to act as stated in the contract and to act with each other in a spirit of trust and co-operation. These two obligations are the only substantive obligations contained in the NEC, but they are global in extent, as they cover all the actions which the NEC requires the parties to perform and all the dealings between the parties. 3. Interpretation of core clause 10.1 What meaning must be given to the word trustin core clause 10.1? The rule of interpretation of contracts is to ascertain, not what the partiesintentions were, but what the language used in the contract means. One of the meanings of trustis a reference to an emotion: you trust somebody if you believe that they are honest, and sincere, and that they will not intentionally do anything that will harm you in any way. This is the meaning of the word trustfrom a social science perspective. It is a feeling or an emotion which is either present or absent in a party, but which cannot be generated at will or upon demand. As the word trustin this sense is not capable of being the subject of a legal obligation, it is not in this sense that the word trustis referred to in the NEC; a party cannot be obliged contractually to feel something. Core clause 10.1 is structured as a legal obligation. The reference to the word trustin core clause 10.1 is a reference to the legal concept of a trust, which is composed of the legal duties of a trustee in respect of property held by the trustee for the benet of a third party. A trust is a duciary relationship with respect to property, subjecting the trustee holding ownership of the property to duties to deal with the property for the benet of another person. This relationship arises as a result of the manifestation of an intention to create it. It is this intention, that is recorded in core clause 10.1, and which identies the relationship created between the parties as being one of trust. As the parties do not actually hold property in trust for the benet of any of the other parties, core clause 10.1 obliges each party to act in a spirit of trust(own emphasis). The reference to a spirit of trustas opposed to the strict letter of the law of trustmeans that the parties must comply with the principles underlying the law of trust, as if these trust law principles did govern their actions. Each party must conduct himself in relation to the assets and rights of the other parties, in the same manner 1 Management, Procurement and Law Brieng: Good faith obligations in NEC contracts Davis and Thurlow ice | proceedings Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Management, Procurement and Law http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.16.00004 Paper 1600004 Received 12/01/2016 Accepted 13/01/2016 Keywords: contracts & law/disputes & arbitration/project management ICE Publishing: All rights reserved

Upload: ngothuan

Post on 03-Jun-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Management, Procurement and Law

Briefing: Good faith obligations in NECcontractsDavis and Thurlow

ice | proceedings

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil EngineersManagement, Procurement and Lawhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.16.00004Paper 1600004Received 12/01/2016 Accepted 13/01/2016Keywords: contracts & law/disputes & arbitration/project management

ICE Publishing: All rights reserved

Briefing: Good faith obligationsin NEC contracts

1 Terrence Davis BCom, LLB, HDip Tax, HDip Co Law (Wits),

Qualified (The Law Society, England)Practising Attorney under the style LindsayKeller, Rosebank,Johannesburg, South Africa

2 Peter Newson Thurlow Pr Eng BSc (Eng) (Civil) Wits,

MSAICE, MICE, MCMI, MAPM(SA), PMP(USA)Construction Procurement and Delivery Consultant, Montgomery Park,Johannesburg, South Africa

1 2

Many employers and contractors, as signatories to NEC contracts, and adjudicators misconstrue the importance and

the effect of core clause 10.1, being of the misconception that this core clause, in so far as it relates to ‘a spirit of

mutual trust’ is merely an expression of good intent, without any binding effect. This paper analyses the meaning of

the words ‘a spirit of mutual trust’ and discusses the scope of the obligation, which core clause 10.1 imposes on the

parties to the NEC contract. It identifies the clause as a manifestation by the parties of an intention to create a legal

relationship of trust with regard to the contractual rights and assets of one another; it equates the resultant

fiduciary duties of the parties to those of a trustee of a trust, which are more onerous than a bare duty to act in

good faith.

1. IntroductionThere is no general duty of good faith in English law, but thisdoes not affect the NEC (NEC Engineering and ConstructionContract [previously the New Engineering Contract]), because theduty of good faith is accepted by the parties in core clause 10.1 asgoverning their dealings concerning the project.

2. The NECCore clause 10.1 provides: ‘The Employer, the Contractor, theProject Manager and the Supervisor shall act as stated in thiscontract and in a spirit of mutual trust and co-operation.’

Core clause 10.1, which is at the heart of the NEC, imposes twoobligations on the employer, the contractor, the project managerand the supervisor (‘the parties’): to act as stated in the contractand to act with each other in a spirit of trust and co-operation.These two obligations are the only substantive obligationscontained in the NEC, but they are global in extent, as they coverall the actions which the NEC requires the parties to perform andall the dealings between the parties.

3. Interpretation of core clause 10.1What meaning must be given to the word ‘trust’ in core clause10.1? The rule of interpretation of contracts is to ascertain, notwhat the parties’ intentions were, but what the language used inthe contract means. One of the meanings of ‘trust’ is a referenceto an emotion: you trust somebody if you believe that theyare honest, and sincere, and that they will not intentionally do

anything that will harm you in any way. This is the meaning of theword ‘trust’ from a social science perspective. It is a feeling or anemotion which is either present or absent in a party, but whichcannot be generated at will or upon demand. As the word ‘trust’ inthis sense is not capable of being the subject of a legal obligation,it is not in this sense that the word ‘trust’ is referred to in theNEC; a party cannot be obliged contractually to feel something.

Core clause 10.1 is structured as a legal obligation. The referenceto the word ‘trust’ in core clause 10.1 is a reference to the legalconcept of a trust, which is composed of the legal duties of atrustee in respect of property held by the trustee for the benefit ofa third party. A trust is a fiduciary relationship with respect toproperty, subjecting the trustee holding ownership of the propertyto duties to deal with the property for the benefit of anotherperson. This relationship arises as a result of the manifestation ofan intention to create it. It is this intention, that is recorded in coreclause 10.1, and which identifies the relationship created betweenthe parties as being one of trust.

As the parties do not actually hold property in trust for the benefitof any of the other parties, core clause 10.1 obliges each party toact ‘in a spirit of … trust’ (own emphasis). The reference to ‘aspirit of … trust’ as opposed to ‘the strict letter of the law oftrust’ means that the parties must comply with the principlesunderlying the law of trust, as if these trust law principles didgovern their actions. Each party must conduct himself in relationto the assets and rights of the other parties, in the same manner

1

Management, Procurement and Law Briefing: Good faith obligations in NECcontractsDavis and Thurlow

Offprint provided courtesy of www.icevirtuallibrary.comAuthor copy for personal use, not for distribution

that a trustee would be obliged to act, if the trustee held thoseassets and rights in trust for the benefit of a third party. In otherwords, each party is a quasi trustee in relation to the other parties’assets or rights under the NEC and is bound by all the dutiesand the limitations applicable to a trustee in his dealings withproperty held by him in trust. By accepting the obligation to actin a spirit of trust, with regard to the other parties’ rights andassets, each party acquires a status of a quasi trustee, and with it,the obligations of a trustee.

4. Interpretation of NEC unaffected byparties’ actions

The manner in which the parties perform the contract is irrelevantwhen interpreting the written contract. If the parties operated aprovision of the contract in a particular, but actually incorrect,manner, this fact will be irrelevant in determining how theprovision was intended to work. The actions of the parties, or oftheir employees or agents, which are outside the parameters of thecontract, cannot be construed as an agreement to vary the terms ofthe written contract, or as detracting from a party’s accrued rights.This is confirmed in core clause 12.3 which records: ‘No changeto this contract, unless provided for by the conditions of contract,has effect unless it has been agreed, confirmed in writing andsigned by the Parties.’

5. Duties of a quasi trusteeA party, in dealing with any other party in a spirit of trust, mustact in good faith and may not place himself in a position wherehis personal interest may conflict with his duty of good faith. Thisrests upon a broad doctrine that a man who stands in a position oftrust towards another, cannot, in matters affected by that position,advance his own interest (e.g. by making a profit or bywithholding relevant information) at the other’s expense, thusavoiding the danger of being swayed by his own interest, ratherthan by his duty towards those who he is obliged to protect.

The overarching obligation of a trustee is to discharge his dutiesacting in a bona fide manner and observing the utmost diligence.This obliges the project manager inter alia to acknowledgetimeously the existence of the contractor’s accrued rights arisingfrom the contract, and to assess timeously the changes to theprices, the completion date, and key dates to which the contractoris entitled. These actions are specifically recorded in the coreclauses of the NEC, but if they were not, the project manager’sobligation to act in a spirit of trust would have obliged the projectmanager to have acted in this manner. This obligation of bonafides does not override or affect the parties’ agreed obligationsand rights recorded in the specific core clauses of the NEC, but itdoes prevent the project manager from detracting in any mannerfrom the accrued rights of the contractor, or from withholdingrelevant project information from the contractor.

Each party’s duties go beyond the duty of acting in a bona fidemanner with the other parties, and beyond the obligation ofrefraining from doing anything which might prejudice the rights

2

or assets of the other parties unless authorised. The parties’fiduciary duties are the same as those required of a trustee.

The parties, in carrying out their specific functions under the NECin compliance with the principles underlying the trust law, mustcomply with the fiduciary duties imposed on trustees: inter alia,they must discharge their duties honestly, observing the utmostdiligence; they must take good care of the assets and rights of theother parties to the extent that they are able to do; they must notdetract from the rights and assets of the other parties; they mustnot make a profit, at the expense of the other party, out of suchother party’s rights and assets, unless authorised to do so; andthey must make full disclosure of all relevant information theyhave concerning the project and the rights and assets of the otherparties.

A defaulting party who failed to act as stated in the contract (e.g.failed to give early warning of an event in terms of core clause16.1), or who breached core clause 10.1, cannot claim, that anysubsequent failure by the non-defaulting party, which arises fromor in connection with the defaulting party’s failure, gives rise tothe non-defaulting party being prejudiced or penalised in anymanner. The principle is that a party, as quasi trustee, cannotbenefit from his own breach of contract.

6. Good project managementThe NEC acknowledges that bilateral engineering andconstruction contracts are cooperative ventures, where the partieshave reached agreement involving performance by each other inorder to benefit all parties and to fulfil the goal of the venture.Honouring such contract is not a matter of each party pursuing hisown self-interest without regard to the other parties’ interests. TheNEC protects the agreed common purpose of the contract andobliges the parties not to act in a manner inimical to the goals ofthe project and to the contractual rights of the other parties. Thisis in keeping with the principles of good project management setby the NEC.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

To discuss this paper, please submit up to 500 words tothe editor at [email protected]. Your contributionwill be forwarded to the author(s) for a reply and, ifconsidered appropriate by the editorial panel, will bepublished as a discussion in a future issue of the journal.

Proceedings journals rely entirely on contributions sent inby civil engineering professionals, academics and stu-dents. Papers should be 2000–5000 words long (briefingpapers should be 1000–2000 words long), with adequateillustrations and references. You can submit your paperonline via www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/journals,where you will also find detailed author guidelines.