brief symptom inventory scores greater psychotic … · 2013. 7. 18. · brief psychiatric rating...

1
CANNABIS USE IS ASSOCIATED WITH GREATER PSYCHOTIC SYMPTOMS AND INCREASED DEPRESSION Christina Comely John Howard Kevin Vaughn Diba Pourmand & Claire Wakefield NSW Department of Corrective Services Macquarie University Palmerston Unit, Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital “Cannabis opens up doors in my head that I believe are closed for my own protection. If I go through these doors, the voices tell me to commit suicide...” Male participant, 33 yrs, quit 3 years ‘I believe cannabis has a chemical reaction in the brain and that it could have contributed to the mental illness that I now have...’ Male participant, current user Sample 3: Current cannabis users (n=16) 16 current cannabis users, the group comprised 3 heavy users (smoking more than once per day) and 13 mild users (smoking once per day or less). 93% of subjects indicated that they smoked hydroponically grown cannabis (approx 17% to 30% THC). Sample 4: Ex-users of cannabis (n=15) 15 ex-users of cannabis, who had stopped cannabis use at least 4 months, but generally 2-5 years prior to interview. Sample 5: Non-users of cannabis (n=14) 14 outpatients who did not have a significant cannabis use history (they had used it a maximum of ‘once or twice’). Confounding factors were carefully controlled in this study. For samples 3 to 5 it was impossible to individually match the controls, but the control group had similar means on key descriptive variables and the remaining variability in age and sex was statistically controlled for. Analyses were also controlled for differences in alcohol and polydrug abuse despite the level of alcohol abuse and other drug use being comparatively low in the sample. Other potential confounding variables were assessed. Little difference between the three interviewed samples was found in relation to medication type and compliance and so it was considered unnecessary to control for these factors. The only significant demographic differences between cannabis users, ex-users and non-users were living situation and gender, the male rate of cannabis use was higher than the female rate. Objective: To further investigate previous findings that the use of cannabis by people with a mental illness leads to higher rates of relapse to psychotic symptoms and worse relapse episodes. Experiment 1: Data Base Comparison In order to investigate the impact of cannabis use on recovery from mental illness we compared the rates of rehospitalisation and remaining in case management in first admission psychosis patients admitted to Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital over a 10 year period. Sample 1: Regular users of cannabis (n=63) 63 patients who, at admission, reported using cannabis at least weekly. Sample 2: Non users of cannabis (n=96) 96 patients reported no cannabis use and were included in sample 2. Table 1: Rehospitalisation index and rate of retention in case management of cannabis using patients compared to non-using controls. Current users (n=63) Non-users (n=96) Significance Rehospitalisation index 0.48 0.39 x 2 =5.11; p=.02 Rate of remaining in case management 45.3% 24.7% x 2 =8.36; p=.015 The rehospitalisation index was significantly higher for the cannabis- using group, indicating that the cannabis-using group was more likely to be rehospitalised after their initial discharge than the non-using group. As well, 45.3% of regular users were still in active case management in September 2000 compared with 24.7% of non-users, implying that the rate of recovery from psychiatric illness was slower in the cannabis-using group relative to the non-using group. Experiment 2: Interviewed Samples Self reported and clinician rated psychiatric symptoms were compared in three groups of psychiatric outpatients in order to investigate the impact of cannabis use on their experience of psychiatric symptoms. Potential subjects were excluded if they had a primary addiction to a drug other than cannabis or exhibited severely disturbed behaviour. Interviews were conducted at the hospital outpatient clinic, the CHC or the participant’s home, and were audio taped. “It is a straightforward down hill process, it made you feel good but when you really looked at it something was broken into you (sic) …it’s a weird drug, you can’t explain it, it just brings you down socially, morally…. I had no self–esteem, …it effected my judgement, I couldn’t think, my concentration was totally blown out of the water…” Male ex-user, who later replied, ‘Yes all the time,’ when asked if it made him paranoid. Results: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Ventura, Green, Shaner & Liberman, 1993). The scores for positive psychotic symptoms, depression and total BPRS score where highest for current users indicating that current users experienced more psychiatric symptoms than ex-users and non-users. (Statistical tests were corrected for alcohol and polydrug abuse, age and sex). Table 2: Means of the 5 BPRS subscales and total BPRS scores for current users, ex-users and non-users (n=41*). Positive Depression Negative Mania Disorient- Total BPRS Symptoms Symptoms ation Current users (n=15) 11.06 12.26 6.8 7.9 2.26 37.0 Ex-users (n=13) 10.76 11.84 6.3 8.5 2.3 36.4 Non-users (n=13) 9.23 9.53 7 7.3 2 31.5 P .04 .004 Ns Ns Ns .004 Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales Figure 1.1: BPRS scales: Means of Total BPRS scores, positive symptoms, depression, negative symptoms, mania and disorientation for current users, ex-users and controls. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Items Figure 1.2: Selected items from the 24 item BPRS. Means for current users, ex-users and controls of items 2 - anxiety, 3 - depression, 4 - suicidality, 5 - guilt, 6 - hostility, 10 - hallucinations and 11 - unusual thought content. Brief Symptom Inventory Scores Figure 2: Means of the 9 primary dimensions of the BSI for current users, ex-users and controls. Brief Symptom Inventory Scores Table 3: Means scores of the 9 primary symptom dimensions and Global Score Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory for current users, ex-users and non-users*. SOM OC IS DEP ANX HOS PHOB PAR PSY GSI Current users (n=16) 1.32 1.48 0.95 1.28 1.24 0.86 0.98 1.12 1.17 1.15 Ex-users (n=14)* 1.07 1.56 1.78 1.19 1.38 0.78 1.08 1.12 1.17 1.23 Non-users (n=14) 0.48 0.81 0.64 0.61 0.64 0.3 0.61 0.45 0.51 0.55 P .01 .02 .001 .02 .01 ns ns .002 .01 .007 Som = Somatization, OC = Obsessive- Compulsive, IS = Interpersonal Sensitivity, Dep = Depression, Anx = Anxiety, Hos = Hostility, Phob = Phobic Anxiety, Par = Paranoid Ideation, and Psy = Psychoticism, GSI = Global Score Index. * One BSI test for an ex-user was ruled invalid. Correlation with years of cannabis use BPRS total and depression subscale scores were significantly correlated with years of cannabis use (r= .3492, p<.05; r= .4350, p<.01 respectively). All 9 primary symptom dimensions of the BSI and the GSI were significantly correlated with years of cannabis use. (For ex-users the years from first use to age at which they quit cannabis). Table 4: Partial correlations of BSI subscale and GSI scores with years of cannabis use and level of current cannabis use (corrected for age, sex, alcohol and polydrug abuse). SOM OC IS DEP ANX HOS PHOB PAR PSY GSI Years of use .567** .632** .540** .676** .585** .505* .599** .823** .673** .666** Level of use .425* .340 .132 .428* .344 .261 .388 .419* .345 .391 * p<.05; ** p<.01 Discussion These results indicate that cannabis use in psychiatric populations may be associated with a less favourable clinical outcome and deterioration in mental health. The rehospitalisation index and rates of remaining in case management imply a slower rate of recovery from mental illness in cannabis users. As well, the higher BPRS and BSI scores of cannabis users in experiment 2 indicate that cannabis use may be associated with higher levels of psychotic symptoms and depression. The neurobiological basis of the observed increase in psychotic symptoms and depression is only partially understood. Cannabinoids, especially THC, act through the cannabinoid receptor system to augment dopaminergic neurotransmission. This overactivity of the dopaminergic system results in psychotic symptoms. THC also appears to inhibit the presynaptic release of serotonin. The ex-users reported dramatic improvement in their ability to function after quitting, stating “I quit cannabis and got on with my life”. Many had gained employment or were studying, things they were unable to do whilst smoking cannabis heavily. However, the association between years of cannabis use and level of distress on both the BSI and BPRS suggests some cumulative impact of cannabis abuse over time. Prolonged use of cannabis may result in gradual long-term changes in brain function. In particular the ability to focus attention and ignore irrelevant information may be progressively impaired, and this may result in memory problems, difficulties with concentration or a general decline in cognitive abilities. It is possible that THC causes a lasting disturbance in neurotransmission and this is not fully reversed with years of abstinence. Background Artwork by inmates of Silverwater Correctional Centre

Upload: others

Post on 23-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • CANNABIS USE IS ASSOCIATED WITH GREATER PSYCHOTIC SYMPTOMS AND INCREASED DEPRESSION

    Christina ComelyJohn Howard

    Kevin Vaughn Diba Pourmand

    & Claire Wakefield

    NSW Department of Corrective Services

    Macquarie UniversityPalmerston Unit,

    Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital

    “Cannabis opens up doors in my head that I

    believe are closed for my own protection. If I

    go through these doors, the voices tell me to

    commit suicide...” Male participant, 33 y

    rs, quit 3 years

    ‘I believe cannabis has a chemical reaction in the

    brain and that it could have contributed to the

    mental illness that I now have...’

    Male participant, current user

    Sample 3: Current cannabis users (n=16)

    16 current cannabis users, the group comprised 3 heavy users (smoking more than once per day) and 13 mild users (smoking once per day or less). 93% of subjects indicated that they smoked hydroponically grown cannabis (approx 17% to 30% THC).

    Sample 4: Ex-users of cannabis (n=15)

    15 ex-users of cannabis, who had stopped cannabis use at least 4 months, but generally 2-5 years prior to interview.

    Sample 5: Non-users of cannabis (n=14)

    14 outpatients who did not have a significant cannabis use history (they had used it a maximum of ‘once or twice’).

    Confounding factors were carefully controlled in this study. For samples 3 to 5 it was impossible to individually match the controls, but the control group had similar means on key descriptive variables and the remaining variability in age and sex was statistically controlled for. Analyses were also controlled for differences in alcohol and polydrug abuse despite the level of alcohol abuse and other drug use being comparatively low in the sample. Other potential confounding variables were assessed. Little difference between the three interviewed samples was found in relation to medication type and compliance and so it was considered unnecessary to control for these factors. The only significant demographic differences between cannabis users, ex-users and non-users were living situation and gender, the male rate of cannabis use was higher than the female rate.

    Objective: To further investigate previous findings that the use of cannabis by people with a mental illness leads to higher rates of relapse to psychotic symptoms and worse relapse episodes.

    Experiment 1: Data Base Comparison

    In order to investigate the impact of cannabis use on recovery from mental illness we compared the rates of rehospitalisation and remaining in case management in first admission psychosis patients admitted to Hornsby Ku-ring-gai Hospital over a 10 year period.

    Sample 1: Regular users of cannabis (n=63)

    63 patients who, at admission, reported using cannabis at least weekly.

    Sample 2: Non users of cannabis (n=96)

    96 patients reported no cannabis use and were included in sample 2.

    Table 1: Rehospitalisation index and rate of retention in case management of cannabis using patients compared to non-using controls. Current users (n=63) Non-users (n=96) Significance

    Rehospitalisation

    index 0.48 0.39 x2=5.11; p=.02

    Rate of remaining in

    case management 45.3% 24.7% x2 =8.36; p=.015

    The rehospitalisation index was significantly higher for the cannabis-using group, indicating that the cannabis-using group was more likely to be rehospitalised after their initial discharge than the non-using group. As well, 45.3% of regular users were still in active case management in September 2000 compared with 24.7% of non-users, implying that the rate of recovery from psychiatric illness was slower in the cannabis-using group relative to the non-using group.

    Experiment 2: Interviewed Samples

    Self reported and clinician rated psychiatric symptoms were compared in three groups of psychiatric outpatients in order to investigate the impact of cannabis use on their experience of psychiatric symptoms. Potential subjects were excluded if they had a primary addiction to a drug other than cannabis or exhibited severely disturbed behaviour. Interviews were conducted at the hospital outpatient clinic, the CHC or the participant’s home, and were audio taped.

    “It is a straightforward down hill process, it made you feel good but when you really looked at it something was broken into you (sic) …it’s a weird drug, you can’t explain it, it just brings you down socially, morally…. I had no self–esteem, …it effected my judgement, I couldn’t think, my concentration was totally blown out of the water…” Male ex-user, who later replied, ‘Yes all the time,’ when asked if it made him paranoid.

    Results:

    Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (Ventura, Green, Shaner & Liberman, 1993).The scores for positive psychotic symptoms, depression and total BPRS score where highest for current users indicating that current users experienced more psychiatric symptoms than ex-users and non-users. (Statistical tests were corrected for alcohol and polydrug abuse, age and sex).

    Table 2: Means of the 5 BPRS subscales and total BPRS scores for current users, ex-users and non-users (n=41*).

    Positive Depression Negative Mania Disorient- Total BPRS

    Symptoms Symptoms ation

    Current users

    (n=15) 11.06 12.26 6.8 7.9 2.26 37.0

    Ex-users (n=13) 10.76 11.84 6.3 8.5 2.3 36.4

    Non-users (n=13) 9.23 9.53 7 7.3 2 31.5

    P .04 .004 Ns Ns Ns .004

    Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales

    Figure 1.1: BPRS scales: Means of Total BPRS scores, positive symptoms, depression, negative symptoms, mania and disorientation for current users, ex-users and controls.

    Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Items

    Figure 1.2: Selected items from the 24 item BPRS. Means for current users, ex-users and controls of items 2 - anxiety, 3 - depression, 4 - suicidality, 5 - guilt, 6 - hostility, 10 - hallucinations and 11 - unusual thought content.

    Brief Symptom Inventory Scores

    Figure 2: Means of the 9 primary dimensions of the BSI for current users, ex-users and controls.

    Brief Symptom Inventory ScoresTable 3: Means scores of the 9 primary symptom dimensions and Global Score Index of the Brief Symptom Inventory for current users, ex-users and non-users*. SOM OC IS DEP ANX HOS PHOB PAR PSY GSI Current users (n=16) 1.32 1.48 0.95 1.28 1.24 0.86 0.98 1.12 1.17 1.15 Ex-users (n=14)* 1.07 1.56 1.78 1.19 1.38 0.78 1.08 1.12 1.17 1.23 Non-users (n=14) 0.48 0.81 0.64 0.61 0.64 0.3 0.61 0.45 0.51 0.55 P .01 .02 .001 .02 .01 ns ns .002 .01 .007 Som = Somatization, OC = Obsessive- Compulsive, IS = Interpersonal Sensitivity, Dep = Depression, Anx = Anxiety, Hos = Hostility, Phob = Phobic Anxiety, Par = Paranoid Ideation, and Psy = Psychoticism, GSI = Global Score Index. * One BSI test for an ex-user was ruled invalid.

    Correlation with years of cannabis use

    BPRS total and depression subscale scores were significantly correlated with years of cannabis use (r= .3492, p