bridging the global generation gap - nasbite

34
Bridging the Global Generation Gap: How to awaken the new paradigm of communication Joel Martino, CGBP Alexandra Bowen, CGBP International Trade Center SBDC Dallas, Texas

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Bridging the Global Generation Gap: 

How to awaken the new paradigm of communication

Joel Martino, CGBPAlexandra Bowen, CGBP

International Trade Center SBDCDallas, Texas

Page 2: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Overview

• Generational Analysis

• Regional/Cultural Analysis

• Technologies

• Communication

• Application

Page 3: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Generational Analysis

Page 4: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

North America

Page 5: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

United States

Tips and Training for Managers – Managing Across the Generations

Generation Characteristic/Influences Motivators

Matures/Builders

(Veterans) 

Value Consistency, conformers, disciplined, respectful of the past

Want to be mentors, seek fulfillment through second career, need experience to be respected

Baby Boomers Optimistic, team players, uncomfortable with conflict, self‐centered

Need to work (career = identity), search for success, satisfied by full engagement

Generation X Pragmatic, informal, easily frustrated, comfortable with technology

Expect recognition for ambition, work/life balance as valuable as cash, want to do it their way

Generation Y

(Millennials)

High‐tech, confident, independent, attached to home & protective parents 

Idealistic, hungry for  frequent feedback, seek freedom as a sign of respect and trust

Page 6: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Europe

Page 7: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Russia

Generation Characteristic/Influences Motivators

Baby Boomers (1943‐1964) Strong professional knowledge, some lack of business skills

More comfortable when not forced to share ideas –(communist rule)

Generation X‐ “Husak’sChildren generation”(1965‐1983)

Modern, self‐taught skills, general uneasiness with structured organizations

Autonomy, generating wealth as quickly as possible

Generation Y – Gen “Pu”(1983‐2000)

More willing to sacrifice work/life balance, corporate‐minded

Opportunities for professional development

Deloitte Review – Talking About Whose Generation?

Page 8: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Latin America

Page 9: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Brazil

Generation Characteristics/Influences Motivators

Baby Boomers (1946‐1967) Practical, traditional, elites are tech‐savvy, lower class not

Larger class divisions, economic instability, dictatorship mentalities

Gen X (1965‐1980) Greater entrepreneurial mindset, traits

Value personal time, work/life balance, development opportunities

Gen Y (1981‐2001) Internationally minded, value mobility

Place premium on workplace offering maximum personal time

Deloitte Review – Talking About Whose Generation?

Page 10: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Asia

Page 11: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

ChinaGeneration Characteristics/Influences Motivators

Post – 50s generation (1950‐1959)

Respect for family , elders, accommodation 

Political & social concepts (communism and Maoism), “Hsiao Ching”

Post‐60s generation (1960‐1969)

Hard‐working, perseverant  Larger family‐orientations

Post‐70s generation (1970‐1979) (Gen X)

More assertive  than 60’s, less than 80’s

More Western in outlook than preceding generations

Post‐80s generation (1980‐1989)(Generation Y)

Resistant to managerial structure  – individualistic, confident, rebellious

Introduction of the ‘One Child’ policy ‐ value autonomy in workplace/career

Post‐90s generation (1990‐1999)

Larger world view, internet savvy 

Technology, Opportunities for Advancement

Deloitte Review – Talking About Whose Generation?

Page 12: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

India

Generation Characteristics/Influences Motivators

“Traditional” generation (1948‐1968)

Loyal, value stability & tenure, Typically aspire to lifetime employment

Favor benefits over pure wage models

“Non‐Traditional”generation (1969‐1980)

More entrepreneurial, decreased loyalty to employers 

Impact of market liberalization – career advancement based on merit

Gen Y (1981‐onward) Career model of employer rotation

Talent programs, development &  international opportunity

Deloitte Review – Talking About Whose Generation?

Page 13: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Africa & The Middle East

Page 14: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

South Africa

Generation Characteristics/Influences Motivators.

Baby Boomers (1943‐1970)

Traditional, Used to strict ‘command’ structure

Tumultuous economic & social changes, impacts of Apartheid

Gen X (1970‐1989) Entrepreneurial, skeptical of corporate mentality

Rapid advancement, ‘Output‐driven’ workplace

Gen Y (1981‐2000+) Tech savvy, democracy‐minded

Seeks a relaxed, informal work environment

Deloitte Review – Talking About Whose Generation?

Page 15: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

The Middle East

Country Younger Generation Older Generation

Saudi ArabiaEducated, mistrustful, backlash against cultural integration, rise of militants

Softened relations with Western countries, result of 70’s oil boom & economic progress

Iran‘Generational Awakening’,  largely pro‐Western, hungry for change & opportunity

Hesitant to change & traditional – impact of Islamic Revolution, Iran/Iraq war

PakistanLess favorable towards West, more traditional beliefs

More inclined to embrace Western concepts, business alliances

Gallup Poll of 9 Islamic Countries

Page 16: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Regional/Cultural Analysis

Page 17: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Interpreting Behaviors

Universal Cultural Individual

DANGER:

Misreading behaviors leads to stereotypes: “A commonly-held, often accusatory assumptions about a group of people.”

Stereotyping reduces communication effectiveness.

Storti, Figuring Foreigners Out, 1999

Page 18: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Individualism vs. Collectivism

Page 19: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Communication Style

Direct Indirect

United States

Japan China Latin America

Middle East

Courtesy: Dr. Sherry Dean - Storti, Figuring Foreigners Out, 1999

Page 20: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Importance of Face

Face Less Important Face More Important

United States China JapanMiddle East

Latin America

Courtesy: Dr. Sherry Dean - Storti, Figuring Foreigners Out, 1999

Page 21: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Locus of Control

Internal External

United States

Japan Mexico

Middle East AfricaChina

Germany

Courtesy: Dr. Sherry Dean - Storti, Figuring Foreigners Out, 1999

Page 22: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Concept of Time

Monochronism Polychronism

United States

Japan China Latin America

Middle East

Courtesy: Dr. Sherry Dean - Storti, Figuring Foreigners Out, 1999

Page 23: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• China ‐ Any meeting with Chinese business people is always relaxed and informal. Protocols serve only as loose guidelines, so you should always ensure you are the first to break the ice with good‐humored anecdotes.

• Japan ‐ It is common to celebrate agreeing a contract with your Japanese client by going to a karaoke club or sushi bar until very late in the evening. However, as you are not Japanese, you are not expected to join in or stay as late as your hosts.

• Egypt ‐ Your Egyptian colleague will stand at a much closer distance to you than you might be used to, as well as display more physical contact. The best response is not to back away but act at ease with it.

Protocol – True or False?

Costa, MaryLou – Beware the culture gap on global growth trail

Page 24: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• Russia ‐ You must show respect for the boss in a Russian organization, and respect the corporate hierarchy. Going over the heads of others is certain to offend and reduce your chances of building profitable business relationships.

• Brazil ‐ Appearances matter very little. Wearing jeans, flip‐flops and other similar casual dress communicates your success in business, not needing to follow convention.

• Saudi Arabia ‐ Appointments with Saudi businessmen are often interrupted by phone calls or visits from friends and family. The best response is to stay cool rather than show your frustration.

Protocol – True or False?

Costa, MaryLou – Beware the culture gap on global growth trail

Page 25: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Technology

Page 26: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• United States

• European Union

• Latin America

• Asia 

• Africa

• Middle East

Impact of Technology – Worldwide

Page 27: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• Marketing

• Negotiating

• Documentary Requirements

• Regulatory Compliance

• Communication Between Agencies

• Transportation and Logistics

Impact of Technology on International Trade

Page 28: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• ‘Smartrooms’, Webrooms, Skype™ etc.

• Broadening of reach due to web capabilities

• Popularity of foreign degrees & certifications

Impact of Technology in the classroom

Page 29: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Communication

Page 30: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Gaining the Competitive Advantage

• Offer Attentive Management

• Show them the Money

• Emphasize Career Development

• Offer Challenging, Diverse Assignments

• Focus on the Work Environment

• Promote Balance

• Utilize Technology

Internal Auditor October 2008 – The Multigenerational Workforce

Page 31: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

• Listen First

• Accept the “Pay Your Dues” Mentality

• Dress the Part

• Reserve Judgment

• Show Rather Than Tell

• Help Them Manage You

Internal Auditor October 2008 – The Multigenerational Workforce

Gaining the Competitive Advantage

Page 32: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Gaining the Educational Advantage

• Positive Interdependence

• Individual Accountability

• Group Processing

• Interpersonal and Small Group Skills

• Face‐to‐Face Promotive Interaction

• Technology

Richland College – Cooperative Learning a Link to Student Success

Page 33: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Case Study

Page 34: Bridging the Global Generation Gap - NASBITE

Contact Us!

Joel Martino, CGBP

International Trade Specialist

International Trade Center SBDC

8787 N. Stemmons Ste. 240C Dallas, Texas 75247

[email protected]

214.267.2216

Alexandra Bowen, CGBP

International Research Assistant

International Trade Center SBDC

8787 N. Stemmons Ste. 240C Dallas, Texas 75247

[email protected]

214.267.2210