bridging the gap between potential and performance: the challengess of indian management
DESCRIPTION
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN POTENTIAL AND PERFORMANCE: THE CHALLENGESS OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT. FRANCIS PIRON, Ph.D., 2013. A COUNTRY OF CONSIDERABLE CONTRADICTIONS. Willing & able to play a leading role in the global economy but with a closed economy in terms of labor, capital and knowledge - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN POTENTIAL AND PERFORMANCE:
THE CHALLENGESS OF INDIAN MANAGEMENT
FRANCIS PIRON, Ph.D., 2013
A COUNTRY OF CONSIDERABLE CONTRADICTIONS
• Willing & able to play a leading role in the global economy but with a closed economy in terms of labor, capital and knowledge
• Highly confident national mindset but small number of confident entrepreneurs
GAP BETWEEN INDIA’S
POTENTIAL & PERFORMANCE
A COUNTRY OF CONSIDERABLE CONTRADICTIONS
• Laden in traditions: – Domination of families– Highly bureaucratic government systems– Lack of management know-how & professionalism, &
ethics– Low quality
• Protectionist Culture =>Inefficiencies, Corruption
• Significant Global Leadership in Software, Automobiles, Bio-technologies, Pharmaceuticals
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset: – Strong residual influences of cultural & spiritual forces– Existence of “ Split Personality”
• One type of behavior in the organizational context (collectivist),
• Another type at the very personal level (individualist).
– This duality is guided by:• Desh: Site or location,• Kaal: timing,• Patra: Specificities of the context
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset: – Dissonance between democracy & caste system– Concept of “Guna,” a personality attribute guiding
behavior• Sattawa Guna, virtue orientation, refers to higher values,• Tamasik Guna, negative value orientation, as with
ignorance, corruption,• Rajas, action orientation, strong purpose/focus
– Western mgmt values are tempered with Indian values, and patriotism & religious values shape organizations, businesses, companies, etc.
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset: – Contemporary managerial worldviews derived from deep
spiritual Indian values, such as Nishkama Karma, the central concept of the Hindu source of human endeavor
– These deep values are rooted in Vedantic philosophy • Emphasis on Dharma, the principled, ethical core,• On Artha, the practical challenges,• Kama, the worldly motivation,• Moksha, the self-actualization.
– Such values are dominant in managerial leadership, organizational cultures, strategic formulation
• Tata uses Dharma as the primary base for appraising managerial performance
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset: – Education based on rote memorization (as in China), but with
strong ability for abstract thoughts (different from China), intuition and logic (argumentative vs. discipline & obedience for Chinese)
– Cultural bonding involves • Sradha, the upward loyalty to someone senior, and• Sneha, affection for and mentoring of someone junior,• Similar to Confucianist values parent-child, older-younger siblings
– Family bonding and social links at the workplace are one of the most positive cultural practices that sustain Indian organization (loyalty, hierarchy, reciprocity, etc).
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset: • Key Traditional Socio-Cultural Influences on the Indian Mindset:– While collectivistic in non-work contexts, Indians are individualistic at work
… “Split Personality.”
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Managerial Context & Global Competitiveness:– Stable institutions– Slow and rigid bureaucracy but abide by the “rule of law” and
independence of the judiciary– “License Raj” 5 decades of “mixed,” socialist-patterned economy– Moved from an economy of chronic food shortages to a service-
oriented economy, becoming a global provider of IT solutions– Significant improvement in the quality of “Made in India” products– Massive growth of management schools and knowledge-based
industries
LOCAL ISSUES & FORCES OF TRADITION INFLUENCING THE MGMT HERITAGE OF INDIA
• Indian Competitive Advantages & Constraints:– Large pool of English speakers– Knowledge-intensive human resources
• Young population (compare to “Reserve Army of Underemployed”
• Linkage to Indian diaspora– 38% of MDs in the USA are Indians– 2% of Scientists in the USA are Indians– 36% of NASA employees are Indians– 34% of Microsoft employees are Indians– 28% of IBM employees are Indians– 17% of Intel employees are Indians– 13% of Xerox employees are Indians
• Indian Competitive Advantages & Constraints:– Large pool of English speakers– Knowledge-intensive human resources
• Young population (compare to “Reserve Army of Underemployed”
• Linkage to Indian diaspora
– Regional diversity:• Inconsistencies in economic ideologies
– Bharatiya Janita Party (strongly Hindu, heads govt. coalition)– Indian National Congress (main opposition)– Communist Party of India (Marxist) (W/ Bengal & Kerala states)– Samajwadi Party– Shiv Sena (MAharashtra state & Delhi)– All-India Anna DMK (Tamil Nadu state)– Akali Dal (Punjab state)
• Indian Competitive Advantages & Constraints:– Large pool of English speakers– Knowledge-intensive human resources
• Young population (compare to “Reserve Army of Underemployed”
• Linkage to Indian diaspora
– Regional diversity:• Inconsistencies in economic ideologies,
• Inconsistencies in managerial mindsets,
• Inconsistencies in governance
– Ideology of nationalizations, regulatory controls, bureaucratic hurdles
– Mindless bureaucracy lacking in innovative spirit
THE MGMT OF INDIAN INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• The Corporate Context:– Family Conglomerates:
• The Corporate Context:– Family Conglomerates:
• Global aspirations
• Hybrid mixture of indigenous & sophisticated global managerial culture
• Backbone of Indian economic & managerial life
• Tata Empire = Indian business culture
– Born Global: • Within the knowledge industry economy
• Enshrine world-class quality, flat & empowered work teams
– Multinational Firms employ the best of global mgmt practices– Govt-Owned & Controlled Entities lack performance and skills– SMEs – Trading mind set, unable to use scale economies
A protest in front of the unfinished Tata Nano plant in Singur last week. (Prashanth Vishwanathan/Bloomberg News)
West Bengal protests lead Tata to halt all work on Nano car factory
THE MGMT OF INDIAN INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• Towards an Indian Managerial Model:– Strong Nationalistic Pride: Mother India– Traditional cultural forces originating from the desire of achieving
a robust global identity– Unavoidable prevalence of the bureaucratic institutional structure– New local confidence in innovation, enterprise & global reach
THE MGMT OF INDIAN INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• Managerial Emphasis at the Micro Level:– Motivational dynamics:
• Different motivational patterns at various levels & industries– Emphasis on Dharma, the principled, ethical core,– On Artha, the practical challenges,– Kama, the worldly motivation,– Moksha, the self-actualization.
• Different motivational patterns in private & public sectors
• Priority of learning replaces economic & security motives
• Decision-Making Patterns:– Top-Down Approach:
• Professional & expert advice may be obtained
• No or low request for participatory energy from staff
• Bureaucratic rules dominate
• Managerial Emphasis at the Micro Level:– Motivational dynamics:
• Different motivational patterns at various levels & industries
• Different motivational patterns in private & public sectors
• Priority of learning replaces economic & security motives
THE MGMT OF INDIAN INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• Communication Process:– Reflect the country’s natural context:
• “Shared Meaning” may not be consistent
• Expectations of “time” are not shared between industries (i.e., future vs. now)
• Excellence in English
• Reliance on “task & role” orientated communication
• Need improvement in cross-cultural communications & negotiations
• Sensitivity to political, religious & social issues • Decision-Making Patterns:
– Top-Down Approach:• Professional & expert advice may be obtained
• No or low request for participatory energy from staff
• Bureaucratic rules dominate
THE MGMT OF INDIAN INSTITUTIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
• Management of Change Innovation:– Wider acceptance of shortcomings:
• Lack of competition – protectionism, socialist orientation
• Lack of professionalization
• McDonald’s
• Managerial & Leadership Culture:– Patriarchal leadership culture dominates– Acceptance of “satisfactory under performance”– Strong organizational discouragement of critical feedback
REFLECTIVE ESSAY
• WHAT HAVE YOU LEARNED ABOUT INDIAN MANAGEMENT?
• HOW DOES IT COMPARE TO YOUR NATIONAL MANAGERIAL STYLE?