5/21/2018 Breitlings letter to Codilis & Stawiorski

1/3

JoAnn & Samuel G. Breitling Number of pages 3

1704 Cornwall Lane

Sachse, TX 75048

Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C.

650 N. Sam Houston Parkway East, Suite 450

Houston, Texas 77060

August 18, 2014

Attention: Ernest J. Codilis, Jr., Leo C. Stawiarski, Jr.; Jeffrey Hardaway, and Mary Speidel

Dear attorneys:

Please note that I have filed the following motions with the presiding judge, Judge Mary Murthy, of the 134th

District Court in Dallas Texas:

1.

Motion to Recuse and Disqualify Judge Dale Tillery

2. Motion to Vacate Void Order for Summary Judgment Favoring LNV

3.

Motion For Judicial Notice of a Judicial Determination of Fact that Beal Switched a Note to Make it

Appear a Wife Signed it When She Had Not

4. Motion for Judicial Notice of Information and Criminal Indictment and Plea Agreement of Lorraine

Brown

5. Motion For Judicial Notice of the Southgate and Bemont Cases

6. Motion For Judicial Notice of Secretary of State Records Showing Corporate Addresses of LNV and M

Mortgage Inc. and Their Officers

Judge TillerysOrder granting LNV summary judgment is void. He violated our constitutional rights to due

process and equal protection of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the

United States of America. His judgment is also void because it was founded upon fraud and fraud upon the

court by the court.

We informed you in a letter dated February 3, 2014, which was our response to a debt demand letter wereceived from your law firm dated January 14, 2014, that we disputed the debt you were attempting to colle

as an invalid debt. Our letter was sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, FDCPA, (15 U.S.C.

1692 et seq.)

Under the FDCPA you were required to investigate the validity of the debt and you failed to do so, thus

violating the FDCPA. Instead your law firm decided to move forward with foreclosure litigation in a differen

court when you knew that your client had been in prior litigation with us in the 116thDallas District Court

where we were the plaintiffs, and that judicial determinations in that court had denied your client a summar

judgment on the same grounds as those purported in the 134thDistrict filed by your law firm.

You claim your client is Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc. and that they are a mortgage servicer for LNV Corporati

In our prior litigation MGC Mortgage Inc. (MGC) was a defendant. Through discovery we learned that they

were purporting to be a mortgage servicer for LNV Corporation. Because we had never received any notices

transfer of servicing or transfer of mortgage as required under 12 U.S. Code Chapter 27, (RESPA), we had

believed that MGC was collecting our payments in behalf of Aames Home Loans. MGC also claimed they did n

have a payment history for our loan. This is why our attorney told us to stop paying MGC. They had not sho

they had a legal right to collect payments from us or that they would properly account for our payments and

apply them to our loans principal balance. We later learned that the deed assignments to LNV and between

parties prior to the purported assignment to LNV had been falsely fabricated and that they contained forgeri

and false signatures, as well as, false statements about the assignees and assignors.

Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc. is shown as a sub-serviceron a list of LPS Service Providers. Codilis &

Stawiarski, P.C. is also on this list of LPS Service Providers. LPS Service providers use a computer software

system (the LPS Desktop) also shown on the list of LPS Service Providers. LPSStands for Lender Processin

5/21/2018 Breitlings letter to Codilis & Stawiorski

2/3

Services, a company identified in the criminal conviction of Lorraine Brown as an enterprise vehicle used to

commit Browns crimes which included conspiracy to defraud. The manner and means identified by the Uni

States in their criminal conviction of Brown included the filing of falsely fabricated mortgage related

documents, such as deed assignments and alongees that contained forgeries, false signatures, and false claim

about the assignees and assignors through the U.S. mail and through wire transactions with county recorder

The United States also identified unnamed co-conspirators in their criminal conviction of Brown.

It appears that your Law Firm is committing the same crimes, using the same manner and means used by

Brown as identified by the United States in their criminal conviction of Brown. It appears that Codilis &Stawiarski, P.C. and the attorneys it employs are among the unnamed co-conspirators identified by the Unite

States in their criminal conviction of Brown.

Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. has abused the courts and committed fraud upon the court by submitting falsely

fabricated deed assignments and alongees that contained forgeries, false signatures, and false claims attorne

employed by Codilis & Stawiarski knew or should have known were false and done with intent to deprive us

our property and to deprive us of our constitutional right to due process and equal protection of law.

Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. sent us a Notice of Acceleration and Notice of Posting and Foreclosure dated Augus

11, 2014 that also included a Notice of Trustee Sale scheduled at 10:00 AM on September 2, 2014.

Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. and its attorneys are hereby warned that if this sale takes place they will be

participating in a crime. We will do everything in our power to make sure each one of the attorneys named i

this letter are criminally prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and they each of you is disbarred for

knowingly participating in your clientscriminal conspiracy to defraud and to launder money obtained throu

fraudulent foreclosures to overseas accounts using fed-wire transactions.

Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. is hereby warned that their client Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc. has engaged in crim

activities that include but are not limited to illegally using caller ID spoofing in violation of the Truth in Calle

ID Act. Charles King, an attorney employed by Dovenmuehle phoned the Tennessee State Bank and used cal

ID spoofing so that the recipient of the call saw U.S. Government on the phones caller ID. He further

misrepresented himself as a government employee with the Mortgage Relief Aid(no such government age

exists). Charles Kings intent could only have been to deceive. The phone call was specific to a fed-wire

transaction. Further investigation uncovered that Dovenmuehle was a domestic go-betweenfor an

undisclosed overseas beneficiary to the account. MGC had instructed homeowners to use this fed-wire accou

to pay-off their loans or cure purported defaults.

Your client Dovenmuehle Mortgage Inc. has also falsely reported to the IRS that they forgaveportions of

consumer loans, when they had not done so. As a result the IRS expected the borrowers to pay taxes of the

forgivenamounts. 1098 forms sent to borrowers by MGC report Dovenmuehle as a sub-servicer for MGC a

the EIN numbers reported on these IRS 1098 forms belong to a Dovenmuehle employee retirement fund.

These actions by your client are indicative of crimes specific to tax evasion, money laundering, wire fraud an

mail fraud.

Many victims of your clients crimes have come forward and have reported to and are working with the IRS a

the FBI specific to such activities by Dovenmuehle and its employees.

Furthermore your clients client, LNV Corporation is conspiring with Dovenmuehle and other enterprise

entities owned by Daniel Andrew Beal and other affiliates of Beals enterprise to commit such crimes. Iincluded in my first pro-se pleading a letter written by one of the other victims of the crimes of Dovenmuehl

MGC and LNV. Her letter was to the Illinois Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission specific to the

illegal and fraudulent activities of a Dovenmuehle attorney, Charles King. (Other victims also wrote complai

letters to this commission, as well as, other government authorities about the illegal activities of attorney

Charles King.)

Within six hours of the filing of my pleading in the 134thDallas District Court a Lincoln Town Car Signature

Limited with a custom roof was seen and photographed outside the home of the victim who wrote that

complaint letter.

The next day the owner of a vehicle that had been parked in this victims driveway on that day received a voi

mail message where the caller misrepresented himself as an employee of an insurance company and falsely

5/21/2018 Breitlings letter to Codilis & Stawiorski

3/3

claimed the vehicle had been in an accident. The caller asked the vehiclesregistered owner to phone a Texa

number to answer questions.

A trace of the phone number showed it to be associated with a private investigation company located near

Plano Texas. The phone number trace also showed it associated with Rafael Castaneda, an employee of Beal

Service Corporation. The only way that this Texas private investigation company and Beal Service Corporati

owned by D. Andrew Beal, could have located the owner of this vehicle was to do an illegal DMV search on th

vehicles license plate number. The only way they would have had the license plate number of this vehicle is

because the party driving the Lincoln Town Car photographed at the victims home the day before reportedthat number back to Beal.

These are not the activities of a legitimate business operation.

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct specifically forbid attorneys from counseling a client to

engage in conduct that the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent that attorneys must dissuade the client

from committing the crime or fraud. Attorneys are instructed that when their client has committed a

criminal or fraudulent act in the commission of which the lawyer's services have been used, the lawyer shall

make reasonable efforts under the circumstances to persuade the client to take corrective action.And that a

attorney should rectify the consequences of a client's criminal or fraudulent act in the commission of which

the lawyer's services had been used.

Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct state: The fact that a client uses advice in a course of actio

that is criminal or fraudulent does not, of itself, make a lawyer a party to the course of action. However, a

lawyer may not knowingly assist a client in criminal or fraudulent conduct.

This letter has been written to inform you that your client and their client are engaging in fraud and other

criminal activities. They have been using your services to further their criminal and fraudulent acts. Now th

you are informed of this fact, if you move forward with a fraudulent sale of our property in behalf of your cli

then you will be doing so with full knowledge of their crimes and therefore will be doing so in collusion with

them in the commission of such crimes.

We demand that Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. immediately advice their client, as required by the Texas Disciplin

Rules of Professional Conduct, to cancel the trustee sale on our property. We require that within 24 hours o

the receipt of this letter that Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. provide us with proof that the sale has been canceled.

If Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. fails to do so we will take every action possible to make sure each one of theattorneys named are held criminally responsible.

We will additionally hold Codilis & Stawiarski, P.C. and each of you individually liable for any financial dama

and personal injury and other damages that we suffer as a result of your clients criminal and your own

violations of you professional code of conduct as well as violations of law.

Sincerely,

JoAnn Breitling

1704 Cornwall Lane

Sachse, Texas 75048