fyoic I

Slaquoperfumd Records Cenm

BREAK _ ^ ^ _ j K OTH

SDMS DocID 469122 _

Trip Report Mottolo RIFS Compliance Oversight

Raymond New Hanpshire

Prepared for

US ENVIRGNMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Off ice of Haste Programs Eanforconait

H a s h i n g t m DC 20460

Work Assignment No EPA Region Site No bullContract No Crai Federal Programs Corporation Doc No Prepared By Work Assignment Project Manager Telephone No Primary Contact Telephone No Date Prepared

C01030 I

IP03 68-W9-0002

TES5-C01030-RT-BLMJ CDM FPC

Michael Kulbersh (617) 742-2659 Roger Duwart

(617)573-9628 December 20 1989

I I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRIP REPORT

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

SECTION PAGE

10 INTRODUCTION 1

11 ON-SITE PERSONNEL 2

20 EECS SAMPLING PROGRAM 3

21 PURGED GROUNDWATER 4

30 FPC SPLIT SAMPLES 5

31 SAMPLE BOTTLES AND PRESERVATIVES 6

32 SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION 7

33 CLP LABORATORIES 8

34 SAMPLE SHIPMENT 9

40 OUTSTANDING ISSUESCONCLUSIONS 9

TABLE 1-ROUND III GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SPLIT

SAMPLING INFORMATION

APPENDIX

1 BECS SAMPLING PLAN

2 EPAS LETTER OF DECEMBER 7 1989

3 FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

4 EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND CUSTODY SEAL

5 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

6 FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

7 FPCS FIELD NOTES

TRIP REPORT

OVERSIGHT OF ROUND III GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

10 Introduction

Commencing on December 12 and ending on December 13 1989 Balsam

Environmental Consultants Inc (BEC) completed Round III of the

groundwater and surface water sampling program at the Mottolo Site

Raymond New Hampshire

CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) was present on both days to

conduct oversight activities Oversight activities included collecting

split samples and overseeing that BEC collected samples in accordance

with the approved Project Operations Plan (POP)

On December 4 1989 BEC submitted to EPA a proposed sampling program

(SP) for the third round of sampling This plan (Appendix 1) outlined

the locations and analytes that would be collected at each sampling

location This plan was subsequently approved by EPA on December 7

1989 (Appendix 2)

With the exception of two surface water samples S-4 and S-9 that were

to be analyzed for volatile organics and one fraction from monitoring

well MW-8D that was to be analyzed for arsenic all other samples as

proposed in the SP were collected Samples could not be obtained at

locations S-4 and S-9 due to the presence of ice Although a

sufficient volume of water was obtained from monitoring well MW-8D for

the volatile organic fraction the slow recharge of the well didnt

permit collection of the arsenic fraction

(1)

11 On-Site Personnel

Those present from BEC FPC and NH DES are presented below Next to

each individuals name in parentheses are the dates they were present

on-site A representative from the New Hampshire Department of

Environmental Services (NH DES) was present to observe EECs sampling

procedures

BEC

Stephan Sokol (12-1212-13)

Gary Garfield (12-1212-13)

Dabra Seiken (12-1212-13)

Keith Taylor (12-1212-13)

Tim Stone (12-12)

Eric Wood (12-12)

Mindy Jacobs (12-12)

Brian Quinlan (12-12)

FPC

Michael Kulbersh (12-1212-13)

Mary Pothier (12-1212-13)

NH DES

Kim Margolles (12-1212-13)

(2)

20 EECs Sampling Program

At the on set of the sampling program EEC broke up into groups One

group consisting of Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken was responsible for

collecting water level measurements and taking surface water samples

Two other teams consisting of Gary GarfleldKelth Taylor and Mindy

JacobsBrian Quinlan were responsible for purging monitoring veils and

collecting field samples Tim Stone was responsible for purging and

saopling MW-18D and for unfreezing locks and opening up veils that

were filled vith ice s o that they could be sampled

Stephan Sokols primary responsibilities were to coordinate the

sampling activities filter field samples for metals measure pH of the

samples collected and occasionally measure temperature and

conductivity for some samples that couldnt be measured by the sampling

team while in the field Mr Sokol was also responsible for filling

out the chain-of-custody forms and packagingshipping the samples

As indicated in section 11 a reduced staff of field personnel vas

required for the second day of sampling activities Therefore the

samples requiring collection on December 13 1989 vere collected by

Gary Garfield Keith Taylor Dabra Seiken and Stephan Sokol

Prior to any samples being collected Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken valked

over the site and collected vater level measurements at the veils in

vhich ice hadnt built up inside the veil casing A steel tape vas

used to measure the depth to vater Chalk vas applied to the tape so

that the depth to vater could be determined The steel tape vas

deconned after each use the procedure for deconning vas to rinse first

vith trisodium phosphate and then distilled vater

(3)

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

I I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TRIP REPORT

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

SECTION PAGE

10 INTRODUCTION 1

11 ON-SITE PERSONNEL 2

20 EECS SAMPLING PROGRAM 3

21 PURGED GROUNDWATER 4

30 FPC SPLIT SAMPLES 5

31 SAMPLE BOTTLES AND PRESERVATIVES 6

32 SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION 7

33 CLP LABORATORIES 8

34 SAMPLE SHIPMENT 9

40 OUTSTANDING ISSUESCONCLUSIONS 9

TABLE 1-ROUND III GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SPLIT

SAMPLING INFORMATION

APPENDIX

1 BECS SAMPLING PLAN

2 EPAS LETTER OF DECEMBER 7 1989

3 FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

4 EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND CUSTODY SEAL

5 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

6 FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

7 FPCS FIELD NOTES

TRIP REPORT

OVERSIGHT OF ROUND III GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

10 Introduction

Commencing on December 12 and ending on December 13 1989 Balsam

Environmental Consultants Inc (BEC) completed Round III of the

groundwater and surface water sampling program at the Mottolo Site

Raymond New Hampshire

CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) was present on both days to

conduct oversight activities Oversight activities included collecting

split samples and overseeing that BEC collected samples in accordance

with the approved Project Operations Plan (POP)

On December 4 1989 BEC submitted to EPA a proposed sampling program

(SP) for the third round of sampling This plan (Appendix 1) outlined

the locations and analytes that would be collected at each sampling

location This plan was subsequently approved by EPA on December 7

1989 (Appendix 2)

With the exception of two surface water samples S-4 and S-9 that were

to be analyzed for volatile organics and one fraction from monitoring

well MW-8D that was to be analyzed for arsenic all other samples as

proposed in the SP were collected Samples could not be obtained at

locations S-4 and S-9 due to the presence of ice Although a

sufficient volume of water was obtained from monitoring well MW-8D for

the volatile organic fraction the slow recharge of the well didnt

permit collection of the arsenic fraction

(1)

11 On-Site Personnel

Those present from BEC FPC and NH DES are presented below Next to

each individuals name in parentheses are the dates they were present

on-site A representative from the New Hampshire Department of

Environmental Services (NH DES) was present to observe EECs sampling

procedures

BEC

Stephan Sokol (12-1212-13)

Gary Garfield (12-1212-13)

Dabra Seiken (12-1212-13)

Keith Taylor (12-1212-13)

Tim Stone (12-12)

Eric Wood (12-12)

Mindy Jacobs (12-12)

Brian Quinlan (12-12)

FPC

Michael Kulbersh (12-1212-13)

Mary Pothier (12-1212-13)

NH DES

Kim Margolles (12-1212-13)

(2)

20 EECs Sampling Program

At the on set of the sampling program EEC broke up into groups One

group consisting of Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken was responsible for

collecting water level measurements and taking surface water samples

Two other teams consisting of Gary GarfleldKelth Taylor and Mindy

JacobsBrian Quinlan were responsible for purging monitoring veils and

collecting field samples Tim Stone was responsible for purging and

saopling MW-18D and for unfreezing locks and opening up veils that

were filled vith ice s o that they could be sampled

Stephan Sokols primary responsibilities were to coordinate the

sampling activities filter field samples for metals measure pH of the

samples collected and occasionally measure temperature and

conductivity for some samples that couldnt be measured by the sampling

team while in the field Mr Sokol was also responsible for filling

out the chain-of-custody forms and packagingshipping the samples

As indicated in section 11 a reduced staff of field personnel vas

required for the second day of sampling activities Therefore the

samples requiring collection on December 13 1989 vere collected by

Gary Garfield Keith Taylor Dabra Seiken and Stephan Sokol

Prior to any samples being collected Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken valked

over the site and collected vater level measurements at the veils in

vhich ice hadnt built up inside the veil casing A steel tape vas

used to measure the depth to vater Chalk vas applied to the tape so

that the depth to vater could be determined The steel tape vas

deconned after each use the procedure for deconning vas to rinse first

vith trisodium phosphate and then distilled vater

(3)

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

TRIP REPORT

OVERSIGHT OF ROUND III GROUNDWATER AND SURFACE WATER SAMPLING

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

10 Introduction

Commencing on December 12 and ending on December 13 1989 Balsam

Environmental Consultants Inc (BEC) completed Round III of the

groundwater and surface water sampling program at the Mottolo Site

Raymond New Hampshire

CDM Federal Programs Corporation (FPC) was present on both days to

conduct oversight activities Oversight activities included collecting

split samples and overseeing that BEC collected samples in accordance

with the approved Project Operations Plan (POP)

On December 4 1989 BEC submitted to EPA a proposed sampling program

(SP) for the third round of sampling This plan (Appendix 1) outlined

the locations and analytes that would be collected at each sampling

location This plan was subsequently approved by EPA on December 7

1989 (Appendix 2)

With the exception of two surface water samples S-4 and S-9 that were

to be analyzed for volatile organics and one fraction from monitoring

well MW-8D that was to be analyzed for arsenic all other samples as

proposed in the SP were collected Samples could not be obtained at

locations S-4 and S-9 due to the presence of ice Although a

sufficient volume of water was obtained from monitoring well MW-8D for

the volatile organic fraction the slow recharge of the well didnt

permit collection of the arsenic fraction

(1)

11 On-Site Personnel

Those present from BEC FPC and NH DES are presented below Next to

each individuals name in parentheses are the dates they were present

on-site A representative from the New Hampshire Department of

Environmental Services (NH DES) was present to observe EECs sampling

procedures

BEC

Stephan Sokol (12-1212-13)

Gary Garfield (12-1212-13)

Dabra Seiken (12-1212-13)

Keith Taylor (12-1212-13)

Tim Stone (12-12)

Eric Wood (12-12)

Mindy Jacobs (12-12)

Brian Quinlan (12-12)

FPC

Michael Kulbersh (12-1212-13)

Mary Pothier (12-1212-13)

NH DES

Kim Margolles (12-1212-13)

(2)

20 EECs Sampling Program

At the on set of the sampling program EEC broke up into groups One

group consisting of Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken was responsible for

collecting water level measurements and taking surface water samples

Two other teams consisting of Gary GarfleldKelth Taylor and Mindy

JacobsBrian Quinlan were responsible for purging monitoring veils and

collecting field samples Tim Stone was responsible for purging and

saopling MW-18D and for unfreezing locks and opening up veils that

were filled vith ice s o that they could be sampled

Stephan Sokols primary responsibilities were to coordinate the

sampling activities filter field samples for metals measure pH of the

samples collected and occasionally measure temperature and

conductivity for some samples that couldnt be measured by the sampling

team while in the field Mr Sokol was also responsible for filling

out the chain-of-custody forms and packagingshipping the samples

As indicated in section 11 a reduced staff of field personnel vas

required for the second day of sampling activities Therefore the

samples requiring collection on December 13 1989 vere collected by

Gary Garfield Keith Taylor Dabra Seiken and Stephan Sokol

Prior to any samples being collected Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken valked

over the site and collected vater level measurements at the veils in

vhich ice hadnt built up inside the veil casing A steel tape vas

used to measure the depth to vater Chalk vas applied to the tape so

that the depth to vater could be determined The steel tape vas

deconned after each use the procedure for deconning vas to rinse first

vith trisodium phosphate and then distilled vater

(3)

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

11 On-Site Personnel

Those present from BEC FPC and NH DES are presented below Next to

each individuals name in parentheses are the dates they were present

on-site A representative from the New Hampshire Department of

Environmental Services (NH DES) was present to observe EECs sampling

procedures

BEC

Stephan Sokol (12-1212-13)

Gary Garfield (12-1212-13)

Dabra Seiken (12-1212-13)

Keith Taylor (12-1212-13)

Tim Stone (12-12)

Eric Wood (12-12)

Mindy Jacobs (12-12)

Brian Quinlan (12-12)

FPC

Michael Kulbersh (12-1212-13)

Mary Pothier (12-1212-13)

NH DES

Kim Margolles (12-1212-13)

(2)

20 EECs Sampling Program

At the on set of the sampling program EEC broke up into groups One

group consisting of Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken was responsible for

collecting water level measurements and taking surface water samples

Two other teams consisting of Gary GarfleldKelth Taylor and Mindy

JacobsBrian Quinlan were responsible for purging monitoring veils and

collecting field samples Tim Stone was responsible for purging and

saopling MW-18D and for unfreezing locks and opening up veils that

were filled vith ice s o that they could be sampled

Stephan Sokols primary responsibilities were to coordinate the

sampling activities filter field samples for metals measure pH of the

samples collected and occasionally measure temperature and

conductivity for some samples that couldnt be measured by the sampling

team while in the field Mr Sokol was also responsible for filling

out the chain-of-custody forms and packagingshipping the samples

As indicated in section 11 a reduced staff of field personnel vas

required for the second day of sampling activities Therefore the

samples requiring collection on December 13 1989 vere collected by

Gary Garfield Keith Taylor Dabra Seiken and Stephan Sokol

Prior to any samples being collected Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken valked

over the site and collected vater level measurements at the veils in

vhich ice hadnt built up inside the veil casing A steel tape vas

used to measure the depth to vater Chalk vas applied to the tape so

that the depth to vater could be determined The steel tape vas

deconned after each use the procedure for deconning vas to rinse first

vith trisodium phosphate and then distilled vater

(3)

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

20 EECs Sampling Program

At the on set of the sampling program EEC broke up into groups One

group consisting of Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken was responsible for

collecting water level measurements and taking surface water samples

Two other teams consisting of Gary GarfleldKelth Taylor and Mindy

JacobsBrian Quinlan were responsible for purging monitoring veils and

collecting field samples Tim Stone was responsible for purging and

saopling MW-18D and for unfreezing locks and opening up veils that

were filled vith ice s o that they could be sampled

Stephan Sokols primary responsibilities were to coordinate the

sampling activities filter field samples for metals measure pH of the

samples collected and occasionally measure temperature and

conductivity for some samples that couldnt be measured by the sampling

team while in the field Mr Sokol was also responsible for filling

out the chain-of-custody forms and packagingshipping the samples

As indicated in section 11 a reduced staff of field personnel vas

required for the second day of sampling activities Therefore the

samples requiring collection on December 13 1989 vere collected by

Gary Garfield Keith Taylor Dabra Seiken and Stephan Sokol

Prior to any samples being collected Eric Wood and Dabra Seiken valked

over the site and collected vater level measurements at the veils in

vhich ice hadnt built up inside the veil casing A steel tape vas

used to measure the depth to vater Chalk vas applied to the tape so

that the depth to vater could be determined The steel tape vas

deconned after each use the procedure for deconning vas to rinse first

vith trisodium phosphate and then distilled vater

(3)

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

For those veils in vhich ice had accumulated either a steel rod vas

used to puncture the ice or a drill vith an extension rod equipped

vith a drill bit vas used to break up the ice In several cases a

propane torch was needed to open the well locks and to help defrost

some of the ice in the wells

For the surface water samples collected along Brook A either an ice

pick a chain saw a drill or kicking through the ice vas necessary to

obtain a sample

21 Purged Groundvater

After the depth to groundwater was determined EECs field personnel

determined how much vater vould need to be purged from the veil EECs

field personnel referenced a table that told them based on the

diameter of the veil and the length of standing vater in the veil the

amount of water in gallons that would require evacuation This number

vas multiplied by three to ensure that the well was adequately purged

For off-site monitoring well MW-18D a pump and bailer vere used to

purge the veil Although FPC didnt observe the veil being purged Tim

Stone indicated that approximately 75 gallons of vater vere removed

from this 6 diameter well Tim also indicated that the water level in

the veil vas lowered approximately 50 feet

Depending on the diameter of the veil BEC field personnel used either

a 125 or a 3 inch diameter PVC bailer to purge andor collect the

samples Eased on past field sampling results and the results of prior

HNu screenings of the purged vater it vas determined whether the

purged water required containerization FPC noted that purged water

from well clusters OV-2SROW-2DR 0W-4SR0W-4DR and MO-3SRMO-3DR were

containerized Since BEC personnel relied on past sampling data an

HNu photoionization Instrument was determined not to be needed

(4)

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

30 FPC Split Samples

FPC collected split samples as part of oversight activities Table 1

presented below lists the locations time of collection analytical

parameters sample matrix traffic report numbers corresponding to each

sample and a column for any quality assurance comments All split

samples vere collected on December 12 1989 and shipped via Federal

Express on December 13 1989

Table 1

Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Round III Groundwater and Surface Water Split Sampling Information

Samples Collected on December 12 1989

Station Time of Analyses Sample CLP Traffic QA Comment

Location Collection Required Matrix Number Field

OrganicInorg

i

S-3 1540 VOA^ sy2 AQ414

MW-21D 1550 VOA GW^ AQ415

MW-18D 0945 VOA GW AQ416

0W-2SR 1030 VOAHet GW AQ417HAM101

D-2SR 1031 VOAMet GW AQ418MAM102 Field Dup

0W-4SR 1140 VOAMet GW AQ419MAM103 MSMSD^

GW-TBl 1935 VOA vater AQ420 Trip Blank

Legend 1- Volatile Organic Analysis 2- Surface Water 3-Groundvater

4- Metals 5- Matrix SpikeMatrix Spike Duplicate

(5)

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

As indicated in Table 1 FPC submitted for analysis seven samples for

volatile organics and three for analysis of metals At sampling

location 0W-2SR a field duplicate was collected and was labeled D-2SR

At sample location 0W-4SR extra sample volume was collected in order

for the Contract Laboratory to perform a matrix spikematrix spike

duplicate (MSMSD) as part of their internal quality control checks A

trip blank to be analyzed for volatile organics was shipped along vith

the field samples The trip blank consisted of Poland Springs

distilled vater lot number 100591 The trip blank vas filled vith

distilled water at the Susse Chalet Hotel Manchester New Hampshire

Due to the excessive cold temperature encountered on the day of

Scirapling all traffic report numbers tags and custody seals vere

applied to field samples after returning from the field to the hotel

room

31 Sample Bottles and Preservatives

All samples collected for volatile organic analysis vere collected in

40 ml glass vials samples collected for analysis of total metals vere

collected in 1 liter polyethylene bottles All bottles vere

pre-preserved vith the appropriate preservatives Samples for volatile

organic analysis vere preserved vith 11 hydrochloric acid (HCL)

Sanples analyzed for total metals vere preserved 11 nitric acid

(HNO-) Samples collected for metals vere collected in non-preserved

bottles and later filtered into preserved bottles With respect to

the volatile organic fraction the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)

requires that 80 ml of sample be collected Therefore it vas

necessary to fill 2-40 ml vials

(6)

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

EECs field personnel were responsible for filtering all FPC samples

The filtering apparatus consisted of a nalge pump a filter and filter

paper The filter paper was 045 microns in diameter The filtering

apparatus had an hourglass shape the sample was poured in through the

top and pumped through to the lower half of the apparatus If the

sample contained a sufficient amount of suspended sediments to slow

down the filtering process the paper was replaced After the sample

was transferred into the 1-liter polyethylene bottle all but the nalge

pump vas disposed

32 Sample Documentation

Each sample bottle vas labeled vith the EPA work assignment number in

place of the sites name to alleviate any laboratory bias The time

date analysis required type of preservative CLP traffic report

number and sample tag were recorded on each bottle The information

was written with a china marker so that the information vould not rub

off or smear Strapping tape was used to seal the lid on all bottles

and a custody seal was placed over each bottle

Each sample was logged in on either an organic or an inorganic traffic

report and on a chain-of-custody form (Appendix 3) A copy of a sample

tag and custody seal that vas affixed to each bottle is provided in

Appendix 4

(7)

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

At each location from vhich FPC collected sample splits a Sample

Description Sheet was filled out Information recorded on these sheets

were CLP Case No sample location sampling date traffic report

numbers sample matrix sample description etc Copies of these

sheets are provided in the Appendix 5

33 CLP Laboratories

FPC shipped all samples under EPA Case 13312 Samples requiring

analysis for volatile organics vere shipped via Federal Express to

Sheryl Bernard

EG Jordan

92 Oak Street

Portland Maine 04101

207775-5401

Federal Express 5216085210

Samples requiring analysis for metals vere shipped via Federal Express

to

Marilyn Fonseca

Skinner amp Sherman

300 Second Ave

Waltham Massachusetts 02254

617890-7200

Federal Express 5216085221

(8)

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

34 Sample Shipment

All samples were placed in zip-lok bags and separated from each other

by absorbent material Frozen ice packs were placed in the coolers to

keep samples at the recommended temperature of 4deg centigrade Copies

of the traffic reports and chain-of-custody forms were sealed on the

inside lid of the cooler Strapping tape was used to seal the coolers

shut Custody seals were placed along two sides of each cooler

Coolers were brought to the Federal Express office the afternoon of

December 13 1989 Copies of the Federal Express slips are provided in

Appendix 6

40 Outstanding IssuesConclusions

As indicated in section 10 BEC field personnel did not collect

samples for volatile organics from locations S-4 and S-9 or a sample

for arsenic from monitoring well MW-8D The volatile organic samples

could not be collected from locations S-4 and S-9 due to the swale

being frozen The arsenic fraction could not be obtained from

monitoring veil MW-8D due to insufficient veil recovery

FPC noted that field decon vater vasnt present the second day of

sampling Therefore field boots could not be deconned after leaving a

contaminated area

(9)

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

Given the temperature EEC and oversight personnel had to contend vith

FPC believes sampling went as smoothly ais possible and in accordance

with EECs POP FPC oversight personnel indicated to EECs sampling

groups that EPA wanted to see that EEC field personnel collected

samples from monitoring wells as soon as they were purged Although

FPC didnt see all the wells purged or sampled for the most part wells

were sampled after purging was complete or after the well recharged

after being bailed dry A copy of FPCs field notes are included in

Appendix 7

(10)

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

APPENDIX 1

^^C S SAMPLING P U N

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

LSAM r^MnONMC^frAL CONSULTAMTE INC

Dgt9iigtoefirgtg Environmenlal Science A Industrial Hyoiene

59 Sliles RoBd

SalomNH 03070

(603)893-0616

December 4 1989 Balsam Project 6185831

Mr Roger Duwart Project Manager Waste Management Division (HSN-CAN5) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 J F Kennedy Federal Building Boston Massachusetts 02203

RE Recommendations for the Tliird Round Sampling Program Analytical Suite Mottolo Site Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS)

Dear Mr Duwart

Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) bus reviewed partially validated analytical data generated from the second round of ground water and surface water sampling conducted at the Mottolo site during September 1989 The purpose of this letter is to briefly discuss these analytical results tiie significance of thc results and to recommend compounds for inclusion in the third sampling round A table summarizing the validated first round and unvalidated second round data is provided for your reference

As a basis for determining which parameters to include during the third sampling round reported concentrations were compared to the first round data and available federal or state standards or guidelines The results of Uiis data review and our recommendations for parameters to include in the third round sampling program are summarized below

HSL Volatile Organic Compound Analyses

Notable concentrations of VOCs were detected in seventeen of the thirty-seven monitoring wells sampled Thc suite and concentrations of VOCs reported were similar to tliose found in the first round samples with the exception of tetrahydrofuran which was found at several additional locations and in higher concentrations at locations where previously detected The only VOC reported at an off site location was tctraliydrofuran at approximately 4 parts per billion (ppb) at monitoring well MW-18D Of the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW2lS MW-21D) only trichloroethene (llOOppb) and 12shyDichlorethene (32ppb) were detected in monitoring well MW-21D Of the ten

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL (raquoNSULTANT5 INC

Balsam Project 6185830 December 4 1989 Page 2

surface water flamplcs collected VOCs were only reported in the sample collected from the lower swale area (S-9) at a total concentration less than 50 ppb

HSL Semivolatile Organic Compound Analyses

HSL semivolatile organic compounds were reported at approximate concentrations in three of the eight second round ground water samples (OWshy2DR M0-2DR MW-20S) collected 2-Methylphenol 4-Methylphenol Naphthalene and 24Dichlorophenol were reported present at a totai concentration of 20 pbb in thc sample from monitoring well 0W-2DR Two ppb of bis (2-ethyIhexyl) phthalate and 4 ppb of Diethylphthalate were reported present in samples from monitoring wells M0-2DR and MW-20S respectively

HSL PesticidePCB Analyses

PCBs were not reported to be present above a detection limit of 1 ppb in the seven ground water and nine surface water samples collected IVace concentrations of Uie pesticides Alpha-BHC Beta-BHC and Gamma-BHC totaling less than 05 ppb were reported in the ground water sample from monitoring well MW-2 ID Pesticides were not reported in any of the other six ground water and nine surfece water samples collected

HSL Inorganic Parameter Analyses

HSL inorganic analyses was performed on samples collected from the four new monitoring wells (MW-20S MW-20D MW21S MW-21D) and 0W-4DR Results of HSL inorganic parameter analyses were compared to slate or federal maximum contaminant limits primary or secondary drinking water standards and EPA Ambient Water Quality Oitcria as appropriate Based upon tiiese comparisons the reported concentrations were generally within acceptable ranges

Arsenic was analyzed in samples from thirteen additional monitoring well locations In general tlie reported results were comparable to the findings of thc first sampling round data

PROPOSED THmD ROUND ANALYHCAL SUITE

Once again VOCs appear to be the primary contaminants identified in ground water and surface water samples collected during the September 1989 sampling program Thc analytical results generally confirmed the compounds and concentrations reported in thc first round surface water and ground water sampler In addition VOCs were not detected in most cases at the same locations in both rounds of samples Based upon these findings we recommend that samples be collected for VOC analysis from on-site monitoring wells on-site surface water sampling locations and one ofF-sIto monitoring well (MW-18D) A

r

iraquo

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

Balsam Project 6185830 December 4 1989 Page 3

wealth of data has been collected by Balsam from off-site monitoring wells and by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) from residential wells which indicate neither ground water or surface water contamination related to the Mottolo site has been identified in the residential neighborhood Therefore considering this data and the fact that the NHDES will continue monitoring of residential wells we do not believe it is necessary to sample off-site monitoring wells during the third sampling round with exception of monitoring well MW-18D

Tlie second sampling round analytical results confirmed that in general notable concentrations of semi-volatile organic compounds and pesticidcPCD compounds do not appear to be present in the ground water and surface water at the locations sampled Therefore we do not propose to collect samples for these analyses during the third sampling round The semi-volatile organic compounds reported to be present were approximated at trace concentrations and are in most cases common environmental contaminants not likely to be related to waste disposal activities at the Mottolo site

Tlie five HSL inorganic purametor analytical results did not indicate notable concentrations of Uiese parameters The samples collected for arsenic analyses generally confirmed the first sampling round results Based upon these data we recommend collecting samples for arsenic analysis from the seven locations which consistently exhibited concentrations above background concentrations in a range of between 0 and 50 ppb

A summary of the proposed third round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attached Table 1 Several on-site locations where contaminants were not detected in thc second round sampling round will also be resampled for VOCs to further confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We are scheduled to conduct sampling activities lliu week of December 11 1989 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this work on schedule Please do not hesitate to contact Eric Wood or either of us if you have any questions

Sincerely

Timothy S Stone CPG RI Project Manager

Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager

epe2415 ene cc J Peltonen (Stark amp Peltonen)

M Robinette (NHDES)

I

^

1 2 0 6 1 9 8 9

Sampling Location

bull M O l laquo^M02S ^ M 0 2 D R

^ M03SR ^ M03DR

M04S M04D M05S M06DR M06

MW7S MW7D MW8S MW8D MW9S

MW9D MWIOD MWllD MW12S MW12D

MWISS MW13D MW14S MW14U MW16S

MW16D MW16D MW17D MW18S MWiSD

MW19D MW20S MW20D MW218 MW2in

December 4 1989

10 12 ^HLbHPl bNUJRONriENTflL 1 603 893 6240

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

TAniE I

THIRD ](OUND SAMPLING SUMMAIlY MOTTOLO SITE RIFS

Uoccmbor 1989

Porumcters to be Analysed

Sample HSL HSL Nuinber VOCs Araenic Metoli

MTL-GW-MOl201 X MTL-GW-MO2S202 X X AfrL-GW-MO2DR-203 X X MTL-GW-MO3SR-204 X X MTL-QW-MO3DR206 X X

MTM1W-MO4S-206 X MTL-GW-MO4D-207 X MTL-GW-MO8S-208 X MTLGW-MO5DR-209 X

MTLGW-MW78-210 X MTL-QW-MW7D-211 X MTL-GW-MW8S-212 X X MTLGWMW8D213 X X MTL^W-MW9S214 X

MTL-GW-MW9D-216

MTL-GW-MWllD-216 X MTI^GW-MW12S217 X MTL-GW-MW12D-218 X

MTL-GW-MW13S-219 X MTL-GWMW13D-220 X MTLGW-MW14S-221 X MTL^W-MW14D-222 X

MTLGW-MW18D223 X

MTL-GW-MW20S-224 X MTl-GW-MW20D226 X MTLGWMW21S-226 X MTL-GW-MW21D-227 X

Ralsam Project 618583024 ISA Page 1 of 2

I

r

iraquo

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

Balsam Project 6185830 December 4 1989 Page 3

wealth of data has been collected by Balsam from off-site monitoring wells and by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) from residential wells which indicate neither ground water or surface water contamination related to the Mottolo site has been identified in the residential neighborhood Therefore considering this data and the fact that the NHDES will continue monitoring of residential wells we do not believe it is necessary to sample off-site monitoring wells during the third sampling round with exception of monitoring well MW-18D

Tlie second sampling round analytical results confirmed that in general notable concentrations of semi-volatile organic compounds and pesticidcPCD compounds do not appear to be present in the ground water and surface water at the locations sampled Therefore we do not propose to collect samples for these analyses during the third sampling round The semi-volatile organic compounds reported to be present were approximated at trace concentrations and are in most cases common environmental contaminants not likely to be related to waste disposal activities at the Mottolo site

Tlie five HSL inorganic purametor analytical results did not indicate notable concentrations of Uiese parameters The samples collected for arsenic analyses generally confirmed the first sampling round results Based upon these data we recommend collecting samples for arsenic analysis from the seven locations which consistently exhibited concentrations above background concentrations in a range of between 0 and 50 ppb

A summary of the proposed third round sampling locations and types of analyses to be performed is provided in the attached Table 1 Several on-site locations where contaminants were not detected in thc second round sampling round will also be resampled for VOCs to further confirm thc absence of contamination at these locations We are scheduled to conduct sampling activities lliu week of December 11 1989 Accordingly we request rapid review and approval of this proposal to allow us to complete this work on schedule Please do not hesitate to contact Eric Wood or either of us if you have any questions

Sincerely

Timothy S Stone CPG RI Project Manager

Leonard C Sarapas PE Project Manager

epe2415 ene cc J Peltonen (Stark amp Peltonen)

M Robinette (NHDES)

I

^

1 2 0 6 1 9 8 9

Sampling Location

bull M O l laquo^M02S ^ M 0 2 D R

^ M03SR ^ M03DR

M04S M04D M05S M06DR M06

MW7S MW7D MW8S MW8D MW9S

MW9D MWIOD MWllD MW12S MW12D

MWISS MW13D MW14S MW14U MW16S

MW16D MW16D MW17D MW18S MWiSD

MW19D MW20S MW20D MW218 MW2in

December 4 1989

10 12 ^HLbHPl bNUJRONriENTflL 1 603 893 6240

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

TAniE I

THIRD ](OUND SAMPLING SUMMAIlY MOTTOLO SITE RIFS

Uoccmbor 1989

Porumcters to be Analysed

Sample HSL HSL Nuinber VOCs Araenic Metoli

MTL-GW-MOl201 X MTL-GW-MO2S202 X X AfrL-GW-MO2DR-203 X X MTL-GW-MO3SR-204 X X MTL-QW-MO3DR206 X X

MTM1W-MO4S-206 X MTL-GW-MO4D-207 X MTL-GW-MO8S-208 X MTLGW-MO5DR-209 X

MTLGW-MW78-210 X MTL-QW-MW7D-211 X MTL-GW-MW8S-212 X X MTLGWMW8D213 X X MTL^W-MW9S214 X

MTL-GW-MW9D-216

MTL-GW-MWllD-216 X MTI^GW-MW12S217 X MTL-GW-MW12D-218 X

MTL-GW-MW13S-219 X MTL-GWMW13D-220 X MTLGW-MW14S-221 X MTL^W-MW14D-222 X

MTLGW-MW18D223 X

MTL-GW-MW20S-224 X MTl-GW-MW20D226 X MTLGWMW21S-226 X MTL-GW-MW21D-227 X

Ralsam Project 618583024 ISA Page 1 of 2

I

^

1 2 0 6 1 9 8 9

Sampling Location

bull M O l laquo^M02S ^ M 0 2 D R

^ M03SR ^ M03DR

M04S M04D M05S M06DR M06

MW7S MW7D MW8S MW8D MW9S

MW9D MWIOD MWllD MW12S MW12D

MWISS MW13D MW14S MW14U MW16S

MW16D MW16D MW17D MW18S MWiSD

MW19D MW20S MW20D MW218 MW2in

December 4 1989

10 12 ^HLbHPl bNUJRONriENTflL 1 603 893 6240

BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

TAniE I

THIRD ](OUND SAMPLING SUMMAIlY MOTTOLO SITE RIFS

Uoccmbor 1989

Porumcters to be Analysed

Sample HSL HSL Nuinber VOCs Araenic Metoli

MTL-GW-MOl201 X MTL-GW-MO2S202 X X AfrL-GW-MO2DR-203 X X MTL-GW-MO3SR-204 X X MTL-QW-MO3DR206 X X

MTM1W-MO4S-206 X MTL-GW-MO4D-207 X MTL-GW-MO8S-208 X MTLGW-MO5DR-209 X

MTLGW-MW78-210 X MTL-QW-MW7D-211 X MTL-GW-MW8S-212 X X MTLGWMW8D213 X X MTL^W-MW9S214 X

MTL-GW-MW9D-216

MTL-GW-MWllD-216 X MTI^GW-MW12S217 X MTL-GW-MW12D-218 X

MTL-GW-MW13S-219 X MTL-GWMW13D-220 X MTLGW-MW14S-221 X MTL^W-MW14D-222 X

MTLGW-MW18D223 X

MTL-GW-MW20S-224 X MTl-GW-MW20D226 X MTLGWMW21S-226 X MTL-GW-MW21D-227 X

Ralsam Project 618583024 ISA Page 1 of 2

I

I BALSAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS INC

TABUS 1 bull CONTINUBO w

Sampling Location

0W2SR 0W2DR 0W3R 0W4SR 0W4DR

Duplicate S1 S-2 S-3 S-4

S-6 S6 S-7 S-8 S9

S-10 Duplicate

^ Trip Blank Trip Blank Field Blank Field Blank

Sample Number

MTL-GW-OW2SR-228 MTLGW-0W2DR229 MTL-OW-OW8R-280 MTL-GW-0W4SR-231 MTL-OW-OW4DR-2S2

MTLGW-DUP233 MTLSW-Sl-201 MTL-SW-S2-202 MTL-SWS3-203 MTLSW-S4-204

MTLSW^5-205 MTUSW-S6-206

MTLSW-S9-207

MTLSW-S10-208 MTL-SW-DUF-209 MTLQA201 MTLQA202 MTLQA-203 MTL-QA204

Iaramotcrft to be Analyzed

HSL IISL VOCraquo Arsenic Melals

1X X X X X

1X X X

+ bull + X X xlaquo t

X

X X

X

X + bullf + + + bull +

Notes

HSL VOCs = Hazardous substano list volatile organic compounds including tetrahydrofuran X - ParameterCs) detected in previous stimpling X a ParameterCs) mil delected in September 1989 somple = Quality eontro) samples = Insufficient quantity of sample obtained iti September 1989 to itnalyze for these parameters s Tentative CDM split or duplicate location during December 1989 sampling

December 4 1989 Balsam Prctject 61868302415A Page 2 of 2

TOTPL P ^

APPENDIX 2

EPAS LETTER OF DECEMBER 7 1989

jMtO sr^

^gi^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I i bull ^ d JF KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS 02203-2211

December 7 1989

Timothy S Stone Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc 59 Stiles Road Salem New Hampshire 03079

Dear Mr Stone

I have reviewed the proposed third round sampling program detailed in you letter of December 4 1989 I am authorizing the initiation of the sampling program as described in your letter

If you have any questions concerning this authorization please give me a call at (617) 573-9628 Representatives of CDMFPC will be at the Site to collect split samples and to provide oversight For your use I have enclosed a brief description of the split sampling program to be performed for EPA by CDMFPC

Sincerely

^ ^ y U ^ - ^ 4Jalaquo^t=t^ Roger F Duwart Remedial Project Manager New Hampshire Superfund Section Waste Management Branch

Enclosure

cc John E Peltonen Stark and Peltonen Michael Robinette NHDES

Michael Kulbersh CDMFPC Steve Mangion EPA

Federal Programs Corporation

December 7 1989

Mr Roger Duwart US Environmental Protect ion Agency J F K Federal Building Boston MA 02203

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NOJ 68-W9-0002

DOCUMENT NO TES5-C01030-EP-BKVR-1

SUBJECT SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR ROUND 3

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dear Mr Duvart

At your request I talked to Tim Stone of Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) on November 29 1989 pertaining to the third round of groundwater and surface vater sampling vhich is scheduled to commence on December 12 1989 at the Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Based on our conversation CDM Federal Programs Corporations (FPC) is planning on collecting split samples from the following locations (See Table) The analytes of interest are indicated next to the sample location along with any notable comment

LOCATION ANALYTE OF SAMPLES COMMENT

S-3 VOA 1

MW-21D VOA 1

MV-IBD VOA 1

0W-2SR VOAMETALS 4 DUPLICATE VOA amp METAL SAMPLE

0W-4SR VOAMfcTALS 2 EXTRA VOLUME FOR MSMSD

TRIP BLANK VOA 1 QAQC SAMPLE

All samples will be analyzed using EPAS routine analytical services In total seven samples will be analyzed for volatile organics and three samples will be analyzed for metals FPC anticipates submitting one trip blank and one field duplicate for analysis The duplicate sample will be analyzed for volatile organics and metals

OncCentoPto Suite 710 Bolaquoon MA02108 617 74^2659

I

CDM Federal Programs Cbrporation

Roger Duwart Page 2

If you are not satisfied vith the aforementioned sample locations please contact me (617) 742-2659

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Michael R Kulbersh

MKok

cc Richard Leighton EPA Regional Project Officer CERCLA Region I John Walker CDM Federal Programs Corporation Regional Manager J Steven Paquette COM Federal Programs Corporation Deputy Program Manager

Anita Rigassio CDM Federal Programs Corporation

APPENDIX 3

FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

jMtO sr^

^gi^ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION I i bull ^ d JF KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS 02203-2211

December 7 1989

Timothy S Stone Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc 59 Stiles Road Salem New Hampshire 03079

Dear Mr Stone

I have reviewed the proposed third round sampling program detailed in you letter of December 4 1989 I am authorizing the initiation of the sampling program as described in your letter

If you have any questions concerning this authorization please give me a call at (617) 573-9628 Representatives of CDMFPC will be at the Site to collect split samples and to provide oversight For your use I have enclosed a brief description of the split sampling program to be performed for EPA by CDMFPC

Sincerely

^ ^ y U ^ - ^ 4Jalaquo^t=t^ Roger F Duwart Remedial Project Manager New Hampshire Superfund Section Waste Management Branch

Enclosure

cc John E Peltonen Stark and Peltonen Michael Robinette NHDES

Michael Kulbersh CDMFPC Steve Mangion EPA

Federal Programs Corporation

December 7 1989

Mr Roger Duwart US Environmental Protect ion Agency J F K Federal Building Boston MA 02203

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NOJ 68-W9-0002

DOCUMENT NO TES5-C01030-EP-BKVR-1

SUBJECT SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR ROUND 3

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dear Mr Duvart

At your request I talked to Tim Stone of Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) on November 29 1989 pertaining to the third round of groundwater and surface vater sampling vhich is scheduled to commence on December 12 1989 at the Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Based on our conversation CDM Federal Programs Corporations (FPC) is planning on collecting split samples from the following locations (See Table) The analytes of interest are indicated next to the sample location along with any notable comment

LOCATION ANALYTE OF SAMPLES COMMENT

S-3 VOA 1

MW-21D VOA 1

MV-IBD VOA 1

0W-2SR VOAMETALS 4 DUPLICATE VOA amp METAL SAMPLE

0W-4SR VOAMfcTALS 2 EXTRA VOLUME FOR MSMSD

TRIP BLANK VOA 1 QAQC SAMPLE

All samples will be analyzed using EPAS routine analytical services In total seven samples will be analyzed for volatile organics and three samples will be analyzed for metals FPC anticipates submitting one trip blank and one field duplicate for analysis The duplicate sample will be analyzed for volatile organics and metals

OncCentoPto Suite 710 Bolaquoon MA02108 617 74^2659

I

CDM Federal Programs Cbrporation

Roger Duwart Page 2

If you are not satisfied vith the aforementioned sample locations please contact me (617) 742-2659

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Michael R Kulbersh

MKok

cc Richard Leighton EPA Regional Project Officer CERCLA Region I John Walker CDM Federal Programs Corporation Regional Manager J Steven Paquette COM Federal Programs Corporation Deputy Program Manager

Anita Rigassio CDM Federal Programs Corporation

APPENDIX 3

FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

Federal Programs Corporation

December 7 1989

Mr Roger Duwart US Environmental Protect ion Agency J F K Federal Building Boston MA 02203

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NOJ 68-W9-0002

DOCUMENT NO TES5-C01030-EP-BKVR-1

SUBJECT SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR ROUND 3

MOTTOLO SITE RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dear Mr Duvart

At your request I talked to Tim Stone of Balsam Environmental Consultants Inc (Balsam) on November 29 1989 pertaining to the third round of groundwater and surface vater sampling vhich is scheduled to commence on December 12 1989 at the Mottolo Site Raymond New Hampshire

Based on our conversation CDM Federal Programs Corporations (FPC) is planning on collecting split samples from the following locations (See Table) The analytes of interest are indicated next to the sample location along with any notable comment

LOCATION ANALYTE OF SAMPLES COMMENT

S-3 VOA 1

MW-21D VOA 1

MV-IBD VOA 1

0W-2SR VOAMETALS 4 DUPLICATE VOA amp METAL SAMPLE

0W-4SR VOAMfcTALS 2 EXTRA VOLUME FOR MSMSD

TRIP BLANK VOA 1 QAQC SAMPLE

All samples will be analyzed using EPAS routine analytical services In total seven samples will be analyzed for volatile organics and three samples will be analyzed for metals FPC anticipates submitting one trip blank and one field duplicate for analysis The duplicate sample will be analyzed for volatile organics and metals

OncCentoPto Suite 710 Bolaquoon MA02108 617 74^2659

I

CDM Federal Programs Cbrporation

Roger Duwart Page 2

If you are not satisfied vith the aforementioned sample locations please contact me (617) 742-2659

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Michael R Kulbersh

MKok

cc Richard Leighton EPA Regional Project Officer CERCLA Region I John Walker CDM Federal Programs Corporation Regional Manager J Steven Paquette COM Federal Programs Corporation Deputy Program Manager

Anita Rigassio CDM Federal Programs Corporation

APPENDIX 3

FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

I

CDM Federal Programs Cbrporation

Roger Duwart Page 2

If you are not satisfied vith the aforementioned sample locations please contact me (617) 742-2659

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

Michael R Kulbersh

MKok

cc Richard Leighton EPA Regional Project Officer CERCLA Region I John Walker CDM Federal Programs Corporation Regional Manager J Steven Paquette COM Federal Programs Corporation Deputy Program Manager

Anita Rigassio CDM Federal Programs Corporation

APPENDIX 3

FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

APPENDIX 3

FPCS TRAFFIC REPORTS

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

unnN CnaM taftmKwninm rRRHDon Agwioy Conbwi I ilwwliwy PRMWH-- Ssmpto MenMemenl O M M Inorganic Itaffic Report

P O B O K S I S AlaMcMsA2a01S TOaWKMBO FTB68M480

2 ntQlon Number

81

snm

^^0yMM yky^^p

bull ltbull)bullbullbull S-u---iilwoi

Sfii^i

A- vL^- 1 ^

K

E M Form 0110-1 (ft-88) Rraquoplaclaquoo ERA Form 207B-Q^ wtiloh mav bo ussd O r e s n - e t M O o ^ PMi - RssSon Co9y WMte bull Lab Copy ter Rotum to 8190 ^ Stena - L ^ ltVt|ii|r

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

8MO Oomf PWc - RsoVo Copv WMtoLflt iOopif4prl|pitonil9l

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

APPENDIX A

EXAMPLE OF A SAMPLE TAG AND A CUSTODY SEAL

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

APPENDIX 5

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO l ^ ^ L

SAMPLE LOCATION M l l ^ 1 - ^ f B gt 0

SAMPLING DATE ^^^lt^^f a t ltff^ hoors

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo A(^^1(^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC I i ^

SAMPLE MATRIX H 2 d^rtrVn^f KJctlcT

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH H A STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ ^ WELL DEPTH

BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO i W l t -

SAMPLE LOCATION 0 - f i 6 ^ f ^ D ^ ^

SAMPLING D A T E ^ 7 ^ ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo ^ C ( A ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC laquo f f ^ l H ^ ^ l O ]

MAiegt^o^^ HAH bulloe p-2e^

SAMPLE MATRIX C^OhlO ri^lamplt

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION v f i I 0 ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DEPTH

DEPTH TO WATER ^ ^ ^

ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

WSTRUMBNT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO IWTshy

SAMPLE LOCATION d ^ - ^ ^ M ^ ^ ^ ^

SAMPLING DATE 1^ i

ORGANIC TRAFFIC 1(^4^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC t M H ~ l O ^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^^niATd(ACLAM^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

f ( M^ ( ^ ( ^ 0 f W ^ ^ ^ z -^^ bull ^ ^ ^^^^Z o d ( y ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ |V^ WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER 66^

BAILER DIA l4 f V 6

BOfTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

p V r ^i^a ^ gti u rirc^i^^n^^^^j^ J a ^ i ^ m

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

r SAMPLE DESailPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

^ASE NO ^ ^

SAMPLE LOCATION ^

SAMPLING DATE I p - P t gt ^ ^ ^ ^ V f e

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I t ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC raquo tljj^

SAMPLE MATRIX ^ ) i U ^ I ^ ^ m t M

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION C t c ^

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH ^^^ ^^^^

WELL DIAMETER ^ WELL DEPTH ^ ^

PURGE VOLUME A ^ J ) DEPTH TO WATER - ^ ^ J

BAILER DIA A H

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

VoK

INSTRUMENT READINGS

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO ^^^

SAMPLE LOCATION M f ^ - ^ I D

SAMPLING DATE l ^ - f ^ S ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC I ^ Q ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC Af

SAMPLE MATRIX ( f ^ Vv DiA- vfc

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 4 i ^ A ^ - h ciXlUu

SURFACE WATER DEPTH STREAM WIDTH

WELL DIAMETER ^ ^ V ^ ^ WELL DEPTH ^

PURGE VOLUME v ( o S l DEPTH TO WATER |)1^^ jT-C^ 1lt BAILER DIA

BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

INSTRUMENT READINGS

^0 jutV6h^^ c^v

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION SHEETS

MOTTOLO SITE

RAYMOND NEW HAMPSHIRE

ROUND 3 SAMPLING PROGRAM

DECEMBER 1989

CASE NO miz

SAMPLE LOCATION lt ^ - ^ ( ^ ^ ^ i d ^ ^ ^ t ^

SAMPLING DATE ^ P - ^ ^

ORGANIC TRAFFIC ^ ^ ^ INORGANIC TRAFFIC r

SAMPLE MATRIX UOoXU^

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

SURFACE WATER DEPTH im STREAM WIDTH Hft

WFLL DIAMETER WELL DEPTH

PURGE VOLUME DEPTH TO WATER i BAILER DIA |1 BOTTLE SIZE ANALYSIS TAG NO LOT NO

4ord m ^^egt-9^

INSTRUMENT READINGS

Ilk

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

APPENDIX 6

FEDERAL EXPRESS SLIPS

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

^ ^SiSSs^iS

^^^iS^st AIRBILL

uamamtni mumimvimmit i i imcemmanM VSA UASKA AMD HAMU mCKABB usmmnmunoiiM Am mrau four W^raquo^ saiisoaiilsiiO nACKING HVUBEn ouammrauiKMiMai n a n v

9290N J ssiboasaio Ssntari Federal Exprasa Acoounl Numbar m SENDSRS COPY

E 110gt-ltie31laquo4 rz-i^-z^ Fnin (Vour Name) Ptniw Piirt Y tu Plxna Nuiinr (Vtry ImpntanI) ^ T o (Peddei t t Nams) Plaaae PrinI

Q L(COJHIZ^^ her^yC T^e^Tha^ Company DepaitmertFtocr Na Cornpeny MpsflBnrtRov Namp

analAddreaa Eittcl Skasl Addraaa n raquo O M M IMMT k f a ( b a laquo f a bull agt CMR J

A CtWTCW PtAZA STB 1 1 0 92-06gtvc ^ - ^ v ^ a S t Claquoy Stij 2tpna9laquolaquo

ftOSTOM KA 0 Z 1 0 8 r HOU) FOP PKK-UP PlU f O E X U t m IF BnxmeiltBviBictmnfmA7mi(fiittt4amwcimraquoamgtgtrmiHcia^)

2 [~) Ba WraquocraquoiTi gtlaquodelaquo Acd No )[~lMraquodPmifflaquoJlaquolaquocciNCL 4 f| M Cwa CMT a

SCRVlCfS S8MCCC0MVTXWS OCCUAED KU( f bull IChKk only one ban) oBumrAUD spou i HAMDLOK AMDUUrrOFUABIUrY m laquo d W i i t M i n m raquo l laquo i i i w raquo laquo l i laquo raquo i i laquo l o f I

1 r n m u n o fKK-Uf in mtmm kt OW CUTVH 8vt4craquo Q i raquo n d b M i i^cn i i p bullandv i a m laquo tas M W to r a s n a t m

patimr)bynmt rDtttmybyrma Mk bull bull no u iMiincM ki raquoraquor d w w 1 i m clt ttaa pg 2 QlajvBiaeBmr tadaipiu raquo r raquo f l raquo rnrnn rt BM iraquolaquoaaraquo lt raquo raquo raquo j 1 t (n t tdMMryamartonraaQiWMMMuAciavah^^waaLPV

3 oftwsnTWttyctmdashiiiiw r~l ~ mliSKunartf l a f f K a ^ k l M k r a a a i V out l i U M i m k u laquoto t a UMH 1 rmdash bull ( - 1 nmaeuseocm t laquo [3 f lSBor t f r7laquo sa bulllaquowr t f l 7Hr amp p M n Santo OulB wMi raquo M ltltgnto m M T

^ I I alaquoicwgt E i yMMlp fy iOMind i r t no r tgt r t clta luraquo r t t pw 52 bull laquo ) laquo laquo laquo bull r- | OMnwsumBUMOFStc icss I B M InovnArtBratL pRA Mkvn^^t iK OMto w d | ^ ^

jB i l l iwrMaf iinctfciodBrticoraiuwangMrtMfcl to t raquo ywtoi ltt i i roCTf (tociiwa ttiuf m i b i x ma i l t e

53QlaquoB6rlaquoir e bull urra IM fliomtoy ovwur vott i t 9ckMt docmartid taift ^ ic^ t l ttomdashwtitfamrtyoaweiyNdwaCi raquobullbullbulllaquolaquobulllaquoraquo bull raquo bull

M Q n raquo r M E bull onetsBMisBiMK lnllaquoagtainaklaquotfongtnkiidalnapanMondavgtpilltM

f c o n o m x SarviiM (tor txtr t U r ot any (mdash1 laquo7wiatinor-laquoP tOttimY by moona viy ctoinv tMUBng tgtanto[fii

- - bulldty) I I (Uidagn TO Q Kwrwosw

o f I I Jbull^ I I srnvirr I D ^bullbull^bullbull^-J_LJ deg ^ ^ ^ bull - ^ c y

9

i f^gt^

AIRBILL ^lumititimmiiimnmimiianmuigtLigttxMAMmimmmi MCKAGfMrxmu Ml bullngru nm MHiDrrareWBm una

TMCKWa HUUBBH

92laquo(iir bOfiSSSl Sandart Federal Express Accourl Number i Oate SENDERS COPY 2

1X03-8031-4C FRarn (Vow Name) Pteasa Print jgttainionaNwTltnr(toltylnv(itorlt) ijTo(nacvienrsNarTie Please Prirt

iampr-T ) g^^TJaoE)fcTaidaiii_amp^i^fgtlaquogt^bdquo^ bull3laquopoundlaquogt^ OapertmenlFloar Na Jmpany Company

^C1)MFC0ElaquoA4 ritaeRAHS IMC Emd street A d d m n C k m M i v to ff 0 aoM or igt o gt

- bull bull bull

O y ~ state i7gtnlaquo)iad Ciy Sue

BaSTOM MA 0 2 1 0 9 o^ajg4^--yen PHOUimR FKK-UP A M FEDEXAUMISf lEFERaCf f lWMIMTXWfMMeAnctn oniwoio$) ^ I F H O I D I

-^^^^25 - n ^ ^ c r ^ - C ^ - O S ^ ^ bull AodNo r ~ | eBMPM rMboe iNo 4 [ H Ba Cndl Cirtf cuy bullsncsBT

ExionOaraquo Z_

SBMCECOHOmOHS OeUAIfEO VALUEDBJVBirAMD SPBML HAHOUMG AND LIUIT OF UABIUr r

UH(ltiaMMaconaButogtyltuaalaquoaniarlttotlaquoMrytraquoatoMtos 1 Q Mwmtncr-ltriraRiaHi raquolt oiraquo arar i Sarvtoa Ouda bull i lat i i upon iairaquolaquoal Saabadltf yltj^

Mndvc copy 01 t M MMi lor k^nta ton

2 QpoABiMaaMr Wraquo bull bull na bgt iMtMjiwUa tai iny ^ M m j n cttiOStaf r f l ltMhlt4hir - f w- fvnJi trf ton- dwrw^^-- ( M M- --- - - Jtoiinon^^Ni l i i l iW i i j IICTiiiBliOuiiiMttJtigMMiwmtocltokii i i i i l i i i i i iMll i i i l l i i l l l IIIIIIIII I w t i l ^ j l M ^ bull n w3 OaAfilSllIlMMf Ibuaavl Q bullnddpognanl yew aou i l tOMtar A i M olita^ luikiwn orimrtv i brttMona touxl tn VM cUMrt FcdMv E)vraM Swvto OUcte Yolv t ID WCMW tarn FadBrtta ip(ip( Yoiv itiri t i r t ID mem Enrw tal WWtolaquoindudino irtrinic viAi tf Vlt |mdash| eomtuaumBuMaac tan

a bull CNTCf IM

amlEm

CbemmSanto MMwtwtprK ffttmrnlyamiumaAf) (la U n Umt a tny o (mdash1 WTMOtrrtor-w(O^mytymcem pukapoow gtsotlaquo

^ - ^ mdash laquo r - l 10 D 11 n nr-rmniin i-_ltOlMiyocnmfenertmay Dadsni)VilulaquolgtHI|ia(l muturoRivmriiKirzW Fmp No

APPENDIX 7

FPCS FIELD NOTES

iiilaquoi

raquo ^

^^f laquo ^ - i

^ A

1- ) 5 (5 ) Jshy

(^ltrz^ ^ 4g r shyj ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^4^ ^ x ^ ^

^ 3L lt^^ ^ i i _ ^ ^ ^ - - ^ Y ^ ^ A jLii^ ^ A AL- 4rltlJ gt W pound

bull - gtiMJ-

Af-^S - 6^gt^ J-C- h-izshyJ M i i S ^ ^ v ^ b-Ooci) d ^ j i ^ c - ^ 0^^

^o-$rgtflt - IPTtA^ j j - c 1 ^ S^S liio^yEmihi ^1 ^^i^fiigtylgt^JfV I - 4P

-00^l (^ ^ (4-^ t-r

APPENDIX 7

FPCS FIELD NOTES

iiilaquoi

raquo ^

^^f laquo ^ - i

^ A

1- ) 5 (5 ) Jshy

(^ltrz^ ^ 4g r shyj ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^4^ ^ x ^ ^

^ 3L lt^^ ^ i i _ ^ ^ ^ - - ^ Y ^ ^ A jLii^ ^ A AL- 4rltlJ gt W pound

bull - gtiMJ-

Af-^S - 6^gt^ J-C- h-izshyJ M i i S ^ ^ v ^ b-Ooci) d ^ j i ^ c - ^ 0^^

^o-$rgtflt - IPTtA^ j j - c 1 ^ S^S liio^yEmihi ^1 ^^i^fiigtylgt^JfV I - 4P

-00^l (^ ^ (4-^ t-r

iiilaquoi

raquo ^

^^f laquo ^ - i

^ A

1- ) 5 (5 ) Jshy

(^ltrz^ ^ 4g r shyj ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^4^ ^ x ^ ^

^ 3L lt^^ ^ i i _ ^ ^ ^ - - ^ Y ^ ^ A jLii^ ^ A AL- 4rltlJ gt W pound

bull - gtiMJ-

Af-^S - 6^gt^ J-C- h-izshyJ M i i S ^ ^ v ^ b-Ooci) d ^ j i ^ c - ^ 0^^

^o-$rgtflt - IPTtA^ j j - c 1 ^ S^S liio^yEmihi ^1 ^^i^fiigtylgt^JfV I - 4P

-00^l (^ ^ (4-^ t-r

raquo ^

^^f laquo ^ - i

^ A

1- ) 5 (5 ) Jshy

(^ltrz^ ^ 4g r shyj ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ -^4^ ^ x ^ ^

^ 3L lt^^ ^ i i _ ^ ^ ^ - - ^ Y ^ ^ A jLii^ ^ A AL- 4rltlJ gt W pound

bull - gtiMJ-

Af-^S - 6^gt^ J-C- h-izshyJ M i i S ^ ^ v ^ b-Ooci) d ^ j i ^ c - ^ 0^^

^o-$rgtflt - IPTtA^ j j - c 1 ^ S^S liio^yEmihi ^1 ^^i^fiigtylgt^JfV I - 4P

-00^l (^ ^ (4-^ t-r

bdquo

r^^llld^ CD V G J I ^ lt A ^

^ ^ i i i L ^ ^jmTjyt^i^fii

4iltu- pound - tStJiiClt^ CAU- --fT ^ J k -~lt A- gtugt- y-^ Xrlty Avy ^

JshyT P ^ ^ I S C ^ ^ ^

^

AQ 4 1 7 VOA

fltampagt ^ t ^ ( i c ^ 4 c

1shy

ltQ4i4 of - ^ 3

AQ 4 1 9 bull trZ)^ OM-IS-^

I l I ImdashImdashImdashImdashmdashr I T Imdashr 1

- mdash t mdash r

i bull I I I mdashmdashmdashshyI I I I111 n I M I i M i

^ 02 - - -^ - r ri i i i M mjfffl

I 1

M M I I I I MAMlOl -Totllilaquollaquollaquo

r r r

^^3^ ^ ^

^Ct^re- c g^gUi -MshyAlt J l

^ j a ^ ^ ^ ^ - - Amt) ^e ^ gt

^ U t ^ ^ ^ bull^^h^^^Z _2Slta i 2 pound i l a u ^ 4^=d) t O d l ^

A^ UdJ

bull2U-)k-^ lt1raquoshy4M ^ ^ - ^ i ^ M ^ L j j f l

^i^mdash^c^ lt 7 ^ ^ ^

I P^ y- s ^rK- l^^^jx^L - S i wt ftt -UOshy

=-S 4^^^-shy

w V Kpdn^ Mi^ La ^ ^ i M

U U iU iM 4 r ^7

4^ ^ fe i

mM u^ uVcL M 4 17ci H ii

^ K bfek Al

l^ i t ^ O ^ f I ^w U=lti ^^ i ^ Mi j plusmn L l^i-dklt^-M 4 r

bull ^-s-- f 5 - ^ r - y gt i i ^ - ^

r^^llld^ CD V G J I ^ lt A ^

^ ^ i i i L ^ ^jmTjyt^i^fii

4iltu- pound - tStJiiClt^ CAU- --fT ^ J k -~lt A- gtugt- y-^ Xrlty Avy ^

JshyT P ^ ^ I S C ^ ^ ^

^

AQ 4 1 7 VOA

fltampagt ^ t ^ ( i c ^ 4 c

1shy

ltQ4i4 of - ^ 3

AQ 4 1 9 bull trZ)^ OM-IS-^

I l I ImdashImdashImdashImdashmdashr I T Imdashr 1

- mdash t mdash r

i bull I I I mdashmdashmdashshyI I I I111 n I M I i M i

^ 02 - - -^ - r ri i i i M mjfffl

I 1

M M I I I I MAMlOl -Totllilaquollaquollaquo

r r r

^^3^ ^ ^

^Ct^re- c g^gUi -MshyAlt J l

^ j a ^ ^ ^ ^ - - Amt) ^e ^ gt

^ U t ^ ^ ^ bull^^h^^^Z _2Slta i 2 pound i l a u ^ 4^=d) t O d l ^

A^ UdJ

bull2U-)k-^ lt1raquoshy4M ^ ^ - ^ i ^ M ^ L j j f l

^i^mdash^c^ lt 7 ^ ^ ^

I P^ y- s ^rK- l^^^jx^L - S i wt ftt -UOshy

=-S 4^^^-shy

w V Kpdn^ Mi^ La ^ ^ i M

U U iU iM 4 r ^7

4^ ^ fe i

mM u^ uVcL M 4 17ci H ii

^ K bfek Al

l^ i t ^ O ^ f I ^w U=lti ^^ i ^ Mi j plusmn L l^i-dklt^-M 4 r

bull ^-s-- f 5 - ^ r - y gt i i ^ - ^

I P^ y- s ^rK- l^^^jx^L - S i wt ftt -UOshy

=-S 4^^^-shy

w V Kpdn^ Mi^ La ^ ^ i M

U U iU iM 4 r ^7

4^ ^ fe i

mM u^ uVcL M 4 17ci H ii

^ K bfek Al

l^ i t ^ O ^ f I ^w U=lti ^^ i ^ Mi j plusmn L l^i-dklt^-M 4 r

bull ^-s-- f 5 - ^ r - y gt i i ^ - ^