brazilian biodiversity fund · 2017-09-19 · sustainable juruti a proposed model for local...
TRANSCRIPT
Brazilian Biodiversity Fund
Management programs and projects for biodiversity conservation Operation of programs and funds
Financial management and asset management
Procurement
Systems Project Management
Scholarships and student research / studies
Design, implementation and management of financial mechanisms Maps and studies on territorial agendas,
demands, actors and financial resources available.
Financial mechanisms for REDD projects
Solutions for public and private sector
Network management Executive Secretary
Capacity building
Organizing events and seminars
What Funbio do today
Among the thematic areas of
action Funbio include:
Support on creation and consolidation of PAs.
Conservation, restoration and sustainable management of species and ecosystems.
Sustainable production.
Sustainable territories.
REDD.
Mapa de Investimentos
Infraestrutura na Amazônia
Investment Infrastructure Map in Amazon region
Brazil
Rj
Rio in Brazil and
Atlantic Forest Fund
Rio de Janeiro’s State Atlantic Forest Fund
In partnership with the Rio de
Janeiro State Environmental
Secretary, Funbio structured a fund
to strengthen the environmental
funding in the state. It has
enormous potential to increase in
the state of Rio de Janeiro, others
states and in the federal
government.
In total US$ 130 million in
contracts for the fund, from
private sector compensation
Analyzing a Source
Volume
AccessibilityFlexibility
Mine Compensation inBrazilian legal framework
Compensation Legal Reserve (forest code)
Clear cut compensation (forest code and atlântic
forest law)
Superficiários – compensation for owners of the
land
State and Municipalitiy Climate Changes Laws
Only in SNUC
Environmental Compensation, Art. 36 - federal +
states
Art. 33, 47 e 48 da Lei do SNUC (use of image,
environmental services, electric transport, and
water use)
Licensing process (mitigation and compensation defined in EIA)
GI = ISB + CAP + IUC, onde:
ISB = Impacto sobre a Biodiversidade;
CAP = Comprometimento de Área Prioritária; e
IUC = Influência em Unidades de Conservação.
1.1. - ISB: Impacto sobre a Biodiversidade:
ISB = IM x IB (IA+IT), onde:
140
IM = Índice Magnitude;
IB = Índice Biodiversidade;
IA = Índice Abrangência; e
IT = Índice Temporalidade.
1.2 - CAP: Comprometimento de Área Prioritária:
CAP = IM x ICAP x IT, onde:
70
IM = Índice Magnitude;
ICAP = Índice Comprometimento de Área
Prioritária; e
IT = Índice Temporalidade.
CA = VR x GI, onde:
CA = Valor da Compensação
Ambiental;
VR = somatório dos investimentos
necessários para implantação do
Empreendimento
GI = Grau de Impacto nos
ecossistemas, podendo atingir
valores de 0 a 0,5%.
CA = VR x GI
Compensation
Environmental values
Total economic value
Use values Non-use values
Total economic value
Use values Non-use values
Direct use
values
Indirect use
values
Option
values
Bequest
values
Existence
values
Compensation SNUC LawUsual Compensation
Environmental values
Barriers
• Legal Framework:
– this money is private or public;
– Where’s the legal link for the new fund?
• If it don’t exist what we can do?
• What the expectations of the private sector?
• How many money is involved?
• Can we match other sources?
• What about the governance?
• Can the state propose sufficient high quality projects?
Distribution of the
Protect Areas in Rio
Fonte : Ranbaldi, Denise - Funbio
Distribution of the
economic actors
Main economic sectors i RJ
Distribuição por setor
petrolífero
50%
siderúrgico
10%
Outros
2%
turismo
5%
equipamentos
0%
portuário
5%
cimenteiro
0%
borracha
0%
agronegócio
0%
alimentício
0%
energético
8%
naval
2%
saneamento
2%
rodoviário
1%
química
0%aeroportuário
0%
petroquímico
11%
ferroviário
6%
papel
0%
In the most
optimistic
scenario more
than US$600
millions be
generated in
the next four
years.
$$
Público / Governo Privado / Empresas
Fontes $:
Empresas
Empreendedores
Rendimentos
Fontes $:
Recursos
Governamentais
(previstos em lei)
Agências Internacionais de
Fomento
Demandas Governamentais
Composição do Orçamento
FECAM e
Recursos Públicos
Fundo de compensação
(pacerias e
remunerações)
PúblicaNatureza da Operação
ANÁLISE DAS OPERAÇÕES PROPOSTAS/ DEMANDAS
FECAMFUNDO DE
COMPENSAÇÃO
+ Governo
Compens
ação
Recursos
de
terceiros
Custos recorrentes
Recursos de ONGs
Parcerias
Recursos de parceiros
Rendimen
tos
FECAM
Novas fontes
Recursos Públicos
Propostas de parcerias
Recursos adicionais de
Empreendedores
CONTRATAÇÃO DAS OPERAÇÕES SEGUNDO A
NATUREZA
(condições específicas)
Funding by a system of Funds
CARTEIRA DE PROGRAMAS/
PROJETOS/ AÇÕES
CARTEIRA DE PROGRAMAS/
PROJETOS/ AÇÕES
FMA – Financial Resources
Compensation
Ex: Federal, State,
Municipal...
Donations
Ex: KfW, private
sector
Res
ou
rce
s
Portfolios of programs, projects and / or actions
De
sti
na
tio
ns
Atlantic Forest Fund
Others
Ex: Individual
donations for
marine projects
The source of the resources define the type of action that the portfolio can fund
Protected
Areas
Recovery
Areas
Sustainable
Use
Others
Revolving and
endowment fund
Sinking fundFin
an
cia
l
ma
na
ge
me
nt
Transparency
The FMA/RJ projects are managed by a online system and manuals, like elements of good governance.
Sérgio Cabral
An financial strategy for federal
protected areas
How much costs an federal protected area
110
55
114
114
11484
5628
55
100
100
98
96
94
59 4949
69
89
109
129
16 26 36 46 56 66 76
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
ano 0 ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5 ano 6
Pré-estabelecimento Estabelecimento Pré-consolidação Consolidação Consolidadas
50.000.00055.000.00060.000.00065.000.00070.000.00075.000.00080.000.00085.000.00090.000.00095.000.000100.000.000
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
16001700
1800
1900
ano 0 ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5 ano 6
Nº de funcionários XEvolução Custo de Pessoal (ano)
Nº de funcionários Custo de Salário + Benef ícios
Planing the investment
ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4
PRE-ESTABELECIMENTO 2 - - -
ESTABELECIMENTO 9 2 - -
PRE-CONSOLIDAÇÃO 2 9 2 -
CONSOLIDAÇÃO 5 2 9 2
total de Ucs 18 13 11 2
PÓS CONSOLIDAÇÃO ano 2 ano 3 ano 4 ano 5Fundo Permanente 5 7 16 18
ano 1 ano 2 ano 3 ano 4
PRE-ESTABELECIMENTO - - - -
ESTABELECIMENTO 7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00 - -
PRE-CONSOLIDAÇÃO 1.638.250,00 7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00 -
CONSOLIDAÇÃO 10.390.341,22 1.638.250,00 7.508.666,67 1.546.625,00
total de Ucs 19.537.257,89 10.693.541,67 9.055.291,67 1.546.625,00
Endownment Fund - Previsão de Fluxo
(taxa de rentabilidade líq.= 8,43% aa)
-R$ 5,000,000
R$ 0
R$ 5,000,000
R$ 10,000,000
R$ 15,000,000
R$ 20,000,000
R$ 25,000,000
R$ 30,000,000
R$ 35,000,000
R$ 40,000,000
R$ 45,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Endow nment Fund Rentabilidade Saldo - Fundo de Compensações Resgates p/ CC
Forecast Flow for a sinking
and a Endowment Fund
Fundo de Compensação RJ
Previsão de Fluxo
R$ 52,000,000
R$ 4,561,670
R$ 25,328,591
R$ 52,578,801
R$ 39,504,908
-R$ 16,198,000-R$ 16,146,000-R$ 16,146,000
-R$ 3,510,000
-R$ 20,000,000
-R$ 10,000,000
R$ 0
R$ 10,000,000
R$ 20,000,000
R$ 30,000,000
R$ 40,000,000
R$ 50,000,000
R$ 60,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Fundo - Saldo Resgates p/ Inv em UC de PI
General Informations
Categoria e nome da UC:Parque Estadual dos Três Picos - UC de proteção
integralPA Areas (hectares): 58,790.
Basic services Yes, trials administration center
Cttys involved Nova Friburgo, Cachoeiras de Macacú,Teresopolis
Attractivity of the PA and tourism Conditions
Scenic Beauty (de 0 a 10): 10Scenic Singularity (0 a 5): 5
Touristic permanence (days): 5 dias Seasonality (month de 1 a 12): 12
Support Capacity 10.000 anoDuration of cultural and sportive events : 45/60 dias por ano
List of the activities Days of
permanenceSingularit
y Seasonali
ty Support Capacity
Cultural x x x x
Trekking 10 5 8 xHikking 10 5 8 x
Bird watching x 5 12 xEscalada 10 5 6 x
RapelRafting 1 x x x
Rivers/water falls /sea 10 3 6 xDive
CanyonisngCachoeirismo
Montanhismo 10 5 6 xCiclismo 10 3 12 x
ArvorismoFotografia 10 5 12 x
Passeios a cavalo 5 3 12 xVôo livre 5 5 x x
Parapente 5 5 x xBalonismoastronomy 5 1 x x
Spotive fisheries
MATRIX OF TOURISTICS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
CATEGORIA CUSTO FIXO
MINIMUM STRUCTURE
250.680,00
93.820,80
46.080,00
ALIMENTATION
242.270,40
126.720,00
57.360,00
SHOPS AND SERVICES107.280,00
144.360,00
HOSTESS
48.720,00
100.560,00
165.960,00
ECOTURISM INFRAESTRUCTURE
393.900,00
Adjusting the demand for
Turism
Sustainable Juruti Fund
Brazil
Para
Para state in Brazil and
Sustainable JurutiA proposed model for local development
In partnership with Alcoa, Funbio is
developing a voluntary fund to
contribute with the sustainable
development of Juruti in the state of
Pará.
The Pilot Fund is already in
operation, managed by Funbio. In the
second phase Alcoa will allocate R$6
million to sustainable development
projects and Funbio will allocate
US$1 million from PROBIO (GEF 1:3
matching).
1. Juruti/PA
2. Lessons learned from mining
3. Alcoa at Juruti
4. Sustainable Juruti proposal
5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
6. Probio II in Juruti
7. Forest management in Juruti
Funbio at Juruti
1. Juruti (PA)
Caracteristics of the municipality:
• Located in the western boundary of Pará
state
• 8.300 km2
• 35.000 inhabitants (65% in the rural area)
• Economic cycles: pau-rosa and juta
• Today: mandioc, fishing, cattle and
extractivist activities
• Per capita income = US$ 55,18
• IDH = 0,63 (2000)
• Low educational level within the
economic active population
• Small local economy, with few job
opportunities
• Important natural features - 67% of the
territory is unexploited native forest
Impacts
Very depending on
the territory, the
mineral to be
extracted, and the
management
practices adopted.
Current model is based on compensatory activities
and does not satisfy the various stakeholdes.
Conflicts often reach the courts.
Perception of impacts
• The perception of
affected communities is
almost always negative.
• It is as important as
the impact indicators.
Answer
•Embracing, by the
company, of the
community
development agenda.
• Direct financing for
the communities
2. Lessons learned from mining
Changes after company’s arrival
• Increasing immigration
• Speculation and growth of slums
• Growth of informal economy
• Increasing demand for public services and jobs
• Consequent pressure on natural resources
Potential risks:
• Pressure due to new investment in the operation
• Perpetuation of a dependency relationship
• Increased operating costs
Mitigation and offset measures:
• Environmental control plans = R$ 30 millions
• Environmental Compensation – R$ 40 millions
• Positive Agenda = R$ 56 millions
3. Alcoa at Juruti
Fund Features
• Voluntary
• Private
• Self-governing
• Long-term
• Participative governance (local
empowerment)
• Effectivity
• Participative management
• Promoting cofinancing and influencing
other funds (public and private)
• Proactivity and coresponsibility on
investment prioritization and new
resources identification
• Safeguards for donors
5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
Why a pilot fund?
• Adjusting Fund’s concepts and tools to
local reality
• Testing the proposed governance and
management, aimed at the
establishment of a separate and
autonomous legal entity
• Assessing the suitability of thematic
lines and settled finance priorities
• Promoting social mobilisation and
articulation
• Promoting fundraising
• Increasing local capacity for
developing proposals and
implementing projects
5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
Financing Strategy:
• It comprises entire territory (Juruti and
surrounding), since the agenda is not limited
to administrative division
• It is aimed at company’s externalities
• First edict – generation of local revenue
through sustainable activities
• It may assemble new partners and
financial resources
• Alcoa Foundation
• Organizational Citizenship Institute
(ICE)
• Municipal Environmental Fund
• Probio II - Funbio
5. Sustainable Juruti Fund
Public Polices for
Juruti Development
Ideflor Territorial Planning:
• Forest concession
• Community management
• Mamuru River State Park
• Settlement project
• To be defined
• Area under judgment
(white)
• other uses
(PEAEX, PEAS, communities)
