bpo in chile_2007

Upload: bgnggggg

Post on 09-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    1/29

    Simon BellDirector, Global Business Policy Council

    April 10, 2007

    Leveraging Chiles Strengths to become aPreferred Location for Remote Services

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    2/29

    2A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Presentation Overview

    The Global Remote ServicesOpportunity and Challenge

    Assessing Chiles Strengths andWeaknesses

    Recommendations to Optimize ChilesCompetitive Position

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    3/29

    3A.T. Kearney / 2007

    The Global Remote Services Opportunity and Challenge

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    4/29

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    5/29

    5A.T. Kearney / 2007

    The range of services that can be delivered remotely isenormous

    Applicationdevelopment

    Application hosting

    Application integration

    Application devt.

    Technical support

    IT Services

    Data mining

    Information research

    Knowledgemanagement

    Analysis & projections

    Modeling

    Research & Analysis

    Engineering

    Design

    Architecture

    Graphics Advertising

    Engineering &Design

    Auditors

    Travel Services

    Legal Services

    Consultants Financial Advisers

    ProfessionalServices

    Diagnostics

    Clinical Trials Education content and

    delivery

    Online Training contentand delivery

    Health & Education

    Web-design

    Editing / translating Writing

    Animation

    Art

    Audio / Video

    ContentDevelopment

    Internal / external

    Inbound / outbound Sales & marketing

    Correspondence

    Mailings

    Contact Centers

    Data entry

    Accounting Payment/receipt

    processing

    HR management

    MIS

    TransactionProcessing

    Evolution over time

    Sample

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    6/29

    6A.T. Kearney / 2007

    39%

    66%

    62%

    50%

    61%

    71%

    73%

    66%

    76%

    70%

    87%

    79%

    Source: A.T. Kearney Foreign Direct Confidence Index, 2003-2005

    Interest in offshoring is growing rapidly across all regionsand functional areas

    11%

    14%

    14%

    15%

    26%

    13%

    24%

    16%

    16%

    30%

    25%

    32%

    38%

    50%

    24%

    26%

    41%

    41%

    44%

    50%

    IT Developmt.& Support

    ContactCenters

    Logistics/Distribution

    Manufacturing

    BusinessProcesses

    KnowledgeManagement

    R&D/Engineering

    Major companies planning on offshoring overthe next three years, percent

    AsianInvestors

    EuropeanInvestors

    GlobalInvestors

    NorthAmericanInvestors

    2005 2004 2003

    Major companies planning on offshoringcorporate activities, by function, percent

    67%

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    7/29

    7A.T. Kearney / 2007

    As a result, all segments of the offshore services marketare growing at very fast rates

    Source: A.T. Kearney projections based on Gartner, IDC, Neo-IT and other sources

    Projected Global Offshore Services Market, 2005 2010 (US $ Bn)

    109

    24

    59

    31

    19

    2005 2010

    CAGR

    R&D/Engineering

    26%

    Contact Centers &Technical Support

    BPO Services

    KPO Services

    27%

    58%

    25%

    20%

    IT Services

    $80 billion

    $242 billion

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    8/29

    8A.T. Kearney / 2007

    While the opportunity is vast, so is the competition

    Countries covered in the A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index

    SENEGAL

    AUSTRALIA

    NEWZEALAND

    SOUTHAFRICA

    GHANA SRILANKA

    INDIA

    PAKISTAN

    ALLEASTERNEUROPEAND FSU

    EGYPT

    JORDAN

    UAE

    ISRAEL

    LEBANON

    TURKEY

    CANADA

    USA

    MEXICO

    MOROCCO TUNISIAPUERTO RICO

    DOMINICANREPUBLIC

    JAMAICA

    CHILE

    ARGENTINA

    BRAZIL

    COSTA RICA

    PANAMACOLOMBIA

    UK

    IRELAND

    GERMANY

    FRANCE

    SPAIN

    PORTUGAL

    KOREA

    JAPAN

    SINGAPORE

    MALAYSIA

    PHILIPPINES

    INDONESIA

    VIETNAM

    THAILAND

    CHINA

    TAIWAN

    FIJI

    MAURITIUS

    Countries actively promoting themselves as offshore services locations

    URUGUAY

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    9/29

    9A.T. Kearney / 2007

    India and China in particular dominate corporate radars

    India42%

    Eastern Europe11%

    China17%

    Rest of World22%

    UK/Ireland3%

    North America5%

    Expected location of offshore functions goingoverseas over the next three years

    Source: A.T. Kearney Foreign Direct Confidence Index, 2005

    To compete in this crowded market,countries need to have a clear positioning and strategy

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    10/29

    10A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Assessing Chiles Strengths and Weaknesses

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    11/29

    11A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Since 2001, A.T. Kearney has produced a Location Index toassist clients in assessing potential service locations

    Financial Costs People Skills and Availability Business Environment

    40% 30% 30%

    Compensation Costs

    Infrastructure Costs

    Tax and Regulatory Costs

    80%

    10%

    10%

    Cumulative IT/ServicesExperience and Skills

    Labor Force Availability

    Language Skills

    Educational Skills

    Attrition Risk

    40%

    20%

    15%

    15%

    10%

    Country Environment

    Country Infrastructure

    Security of IntellectualProperty

    Cultural Exposure

    60%

    20%

    10%

    10%

    Metrics evaluated in the A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index

    Source: A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    12/29

    12A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Chile has consistently ranked among the top 10 countriesin the Index

    3.2

    2.9

    2.8

    3.2

    2.6

    3.3

    2.73.3

    3.2

    2.6

    1.7

    2.8

    3.2

    3.1

    2.4

    2.4

    2.6

    2.6

    3.3

    2.7

    0.5

    3.0

    2.9

    2.5

    2.8

    2.3

    2.3

    1.3

    1.2

    1.8

    1.5

    1.21.2

    1.0

    1.5

    1.5

    1.0

    1.1

    1.0

    1.0

    1.1

    0.9

    1.2

    1.0

    0.9

    2.7

    1.0

    1.3

    1.0

    1.0

    1.4

    1.4

    2.0

    1.6

    1.5

    1.1

    1.91.3

    1.6

    1.6

    2.5

    1.8

    1.3

    1.5

    2.2

    2.1

    2.0

    1.8

    1.2

    1.9

    2.3

    1.5

    1.3

    2.0

    1.6

    IndiaChina

    MalaysiaThailand

    BrazilIndonesia

    ChilePhilippinesBulgaria

    MexicoSingapore

    SlovakiaEgypt

    JordanEstoniaCzechLatvia

    PolandVietnam

    UAEUSA (Tier II)

    UruguayArgentinaHungaryMauritius

    Source: A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index 2007

    Global Services Location Index 2007

    Ranks 1-25 Ranks 26-50

    3.0

    3.3

    2.6

    3.2

    3.2

    2.5

    2.82.9

    3.0

    0.8

    2.9

    2.6

    2.0

    3.2

    0.5

    2.9

    0.5

    1.2

    1.5

    0.9

    1.6

    2.8

    0.5

    2.1

    0.4

    0.9

    0.9

    0.8

    1.0

    1.0

    1.2

    1.00.9

    0.9

    2.1

    0.9

    1.4

    1.3

    0.8

    2.2

    0.8

    2.2

    1.7

    1.1

    1.7

    1.1

    1.0

    2.1

    1.3

    1.5

    1.5

    1.3

    2.0

    1.2

    1.1

    1.6

    1.51.5

    1.4

    2.3

    1.3

    1.2

    1.9

    1.1

    2.4

    1.4

    2.4

    2.1

    2.3

    2.3

    2.1

    1.1

    2.3

    1.4

    2.3

    TunisiaGhana

    LithuaniaSri Lanka

    PakistanSouth Africa

    JamaicaRomaniaCosta Rica

    CanadaMorocco

    RussiaIsrael

    SenegalGermany (Tier II)

    PanamaUK (Tier II)

    SpainNew Zealand

    AustraliaPortugalUkraine

    France (Tier II)TurkeyIreland

    EnvironmentFinancial PeopleCountry score:

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    13/29

    13A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Chiles has slightly higher wages than most key regionalcompetitors, making it marginally less financially attractive

    GSLI Financial Attractiveness Scores 2007

    0.7

    5.7

    6.0

    5.6

    6.4

    6.4

    6.3

    6.3

    6.6

    0.6

    0.7

    0.4

    0.4

    0.4

    0.3

    0.3

    0.6

    0.4

    0.4

    0.6

    0.5

    0.5

    0.2

    0.6

    0.4

    0.5

    0.3

    0.5

    0.6

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    Mexico

    Brazil

    Chile

    Jamaica

    Panama

    Argentina

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Tax & Regulatory Cost

    Compensation Cost

    Infrastructure Cost

    Business airfare avg.from US/ EU/ Japan

    Rent ($/m2, class A) Electricity ($/KwH,

    commercial) Telecom ($/capacity)

    Infrastructure Costs

    Total Tax Burden Corruption

    Perception Index Currency

    Depreciation

    Tax & RegulatoryCosts

    Assessment Criteria

    Average Wages Programmer Salary Call Center Salary BPO Analyst Salary Local Manager

    Salary

    Compensation Costs

    Source: A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index 2007

    Financial Attractiveness

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    14/29

    14A.T. Kearney / 2007

    However, this is offset partially by a lower tax burden andcompetitive infrastructure costs

    Financial Attractiveness

    Chile

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Colombia

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Jamaica

    Mexico

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    150-170

    125-140

    200-220

    140-160

    110-130

    210-230

    160-180

    310-340

    250-280

    125-140

    150-170

    Average Rent, Metro AreasUS$/sq m, 2006

    Total Tax Rate, 2006(As share of profits)(1)

    Executive Perception ofTax Burden, 2006

    (Scale 0 7)(2)

    Notes: (1) The total tax rate measures the amount of taxes payable by a business in the second year of operation, expressed as share of profits.(2) The overall tax burden on an enterprise, including all associated costs (tax rates plus administrative and time costs, penalties, etc.),is estimated as share of net revenues (1=0-4%, 2=5-15%, 3=16-25%, 7=81-100%).

    Source: Rent: Colliers, CB Richard Ellis;Total Tax Rate: Doing Business 2007, World Bank; Executive Perception of Tax Burden:Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum 2006

    26.3

    116.8

    82.8

    27.6

    37.1

    83.0

    52.4

    46.0

    43.0

    52.3

    71.7

    3.2

    4.5

    4.6

    3.4

    3.9

    3.7

    3.0

    3.7

    3.6

    4.4

    4.2

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    15/29

    15A.T. Kearney / 2007

    0.3

    0.4

    0.3

    0.4

    1.2

    1.3

    1.8

    2.2

    3.4

    4.0

    0.1

    0.4

    0.8

    1.3

    0.3

    2.0

    1.0

    0.7

    1.1

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.0

    1.3

    1.2

    1.1

    1.2

    1.5

    1.2

    1.2

    1.2

    1.2

    1.5

    1.5

    0.4

    0.2

    0.4

    0.5

    0.3

    0.3

    0.5

    0.5

    0.7

    1.2

    0.6

    0.7

    Panama

    Costa Rica

    Jamaica

    Uruguay

    Chile

    Argentina

    Mexico

    Brazil

    Canada

    USA (Tier II)

    Chile is also disadvantaged by the relatively smaller size ofits talent base and industry experience

    GSLI People Skills and Availability Scores 2007

    People Availability and Skills

    Educational Skills

    IT/BPO industry size/quality

    Laborforce Availability

    Language Skills

    Attrition Risk

    Size of 15-39 populationTertiary student enrollment

    Labor Force Availability

    Mathematical Literacy

    Scientific LiteracyReading LiteracyMean score on TOEFL

    Education & Language

    IT/BPO Market Size# of firms with CMM/CMMILevel of CMM/CMMI

    Integration# COPC certified centers# ISO certified centers

    Quality of ManagementSchools

    IT / BPO ServicesExperience and Skills

    Attrition Risk (BPO growthless unemployment rate)

    Attrition Risk

    Assessment Criteria

    Source: A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index 2007

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    16/29

    16A.T. Kearney / 2007

    To address this, Chile is doing a good job of driving qualitycertification, English skills and management education

    People Availability and Skills

    Chile

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Colombia

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Jamaica

    Mexico

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    Native English Speaking

    Native English Speaking

    Native English Speaking

    Note: (1) Scale legend: 1=schools lag far behind most other countries, 7=schools are among the best in the world.

    Source: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute; Education Testing Service Test of English as a Foreign Language;Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum

    Mean score on TOEFLexam, 2004

    Executive perception of qualityof management schools,

    2005 (Scale 0-7)(1)

    2,633

    n/a

    103

    < 10

    < 10

    Number of firms withCMM/CMMI certification 2005-

    2006

    39

    27

    44

    0

    71

    0

    5.5

    5.1

    4.6

    4.2

    4.7

    5.1

    3.3

    6.6

    6.0

    4.4

    4.5

    236

    245

    221

    244

    230

    233

    223

    230

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    17/29

    17A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Chile really excels in the area of business environment

    Overall Quality Telephone/Fax Quality Competition in ISP Sector Quality of Electricity Supply

    Country Infrastructure

    Globalization Index

    "Personal Contact" rank

    Cultural Exposure

    Assessment Criteria

    EIU Country Risk FDI Confidence Index rank Political Environment Business Cost of Terrorism Regulatory Burden Government success in ICT

    promotion

    Ease of Doing Business

    Country Environment(Economic & Political)

    Rigor of IP protection Laws related to ICT Software piracy rates (%) # ISO Information security

    certified centers

    Security of IP

    Business Environment

    2.3

    2.7

    2.6

    2.9

    2.4

    2.9

    3.3

    4.1

    4.4

    4.4

    1.3

    0.9

    1.3

    1.3

    1.3

    1.4

    1.2

    1.6

    1.9

    1.8

    0.3

    0.5

    0.4

    0.2

    1.0

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.76

    0.60.9

    0.6

    0.3

    0.35

    0.33

    0.38

    0.31

    0.33

    0.36

    0.41

    Argentina

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Brazil

    Jamaica

    Uruguay

    Mexico

    Chile

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    GSLI Business Environment Scores 2007

    Economic/PoliticalEnvironment

    Infrastructure Quality

    Cultural Exposure

    IP Security

    Source: A.T. Kearney Global Services Location Index 2007

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    18/29

    18A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Chile offers by far the most stable business-friendlyoperating environment in Latin America

    Business Environment

    EIU Overall Business Risk2006

    100=high risk (lower is better)

    Source: Economist Intelligence Unit, Global Competitiveness Report, World Economic Forum; World Bank, Doing Business 2007

    Chile

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Colombia

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Jamaica

    Mexico

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    World Bank Labor MarketRigidity, 2006

    100= Most rigid

    Executive Perception ofRegulatory Burden, 2006

    Index 1-5 (5 = lowest burden)

    3.6

    2.4

    2.8

    2.9

    2.5

    2.6

    2.9

    3.4

    2.6

    2.0

    3.6

    53

    54

    21

    40

    41

    40

    40

    22

    20

    50

    48

    24

    41

    27

    31

    38

    32

    56

    0

    4

    4

    42

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    19/29

    19A.T. Kearney / 2007

    It is also by far the safest environment in Latin America

    Business Environment

    n/a

    EIU Political Environment, 2006

    1-10 (10=good environment)

    Source: Economist Intelligence Unit, America Economa, Transparency International

    Chile

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Colombia

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Jamaica

    Mexico

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    1-10 (10 = least corruption)

    Safety Index2005

    1=(very bad) 5 (very good)

    Corruption Perception Index

    7.3

    2.9

    3.9

    6.4

    4.1

    3.1

    8.5

    3.7

    3.3

    7.3

    3.3

    5

    4

    5

    5

    3-4

    1-5

    3-4

    1-3

    2-3

    1-3

    7.8

    5.8

    6.1

    5.9

    6.9

    6.4

    7.9

    8.1

    5.9

    6.4

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    20/29

    20A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Chiles infrastructure is also the best in the region

    Chile

    Argentina

    Brazil

    Colombia

    Uruguay

    Costa Rica

    Panama

    Jamaica

    Mexico

    USA (Tier II)

    Canada

    Executive perception of overallinfrastructure quality(Scale 0 7)(1) 2006

    Note: (1) Perception of infrastructure in the country is 1= poorly developed and insufficient, 7= among the best in the world

    Source: Global Competitiveness Report 2006, World Economic Forum

    Executive perception ofphone infrastructurequality

    (Scale 0 7 )(1) 2006

    Executive perception ofquality of electricity supply

    (Scale 0 7)(1) 2006

    4.9

    3.6

    2.9

    3.8

    3.5

    2.6

    3.6

    6.5

    6.1

    3.6

    2.8

    6.7

    5.8

    5.8

    6.4

    5.7

    3.2

    5.6

    6.7

    6.6

    6.2

    5.2

    5.5

    4.3

    5.0

    5.4

    3.8

    5.2

    4.8

    6.6

    6.5

    4.5

    4.7

    Business Environment

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    21/29

    21A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Interviews with industry players inside and outside Chileconfirm broad recognition of Chiles key strengths

    Political andeconomic stability

    Chiles political and economic stability is widely recognized Long term investors, such as multinationals developing captive shared service centers,

    consider this a particularly important factor

    Transparency andstrength ofinstitutions

    Chile is considered the most transparent location to do business in Latin America The existence and general enforcement of regulationsas in labor and arbitrationprovides

    confidence, compared to volatile conditions in Argentina, Colombia or even Brazil.

    As one investor said, one can rest assured that institutions will do their job

    Pro-businessclimate

    Radical demands from labor and other interest groups are much lower than in peer countries Investors are enthusiastic about the effectiveness and efficiency of government agencies. A recent

    investor indicates visas can be obtained in weeks in Chile rather than months in other countries

    Developedinfrastructure

    Developed telecommunications is mentioned as one of the key countrys strengths Santiago offers all the amenities of a developed city and has air connections with major world hubs

    Specialized talentavailability and

    stability

    Investors recognize that Chiles top talent pool is as strong as any in the world. Non-investorsmention Chiles reputation for qualified and well educated people

    Unlike locations like Costa Rica, India, and China, salaries are stable, making Chile increasinglyattractive as the cost arbitrage of other locations decreases

    Strong supportfrom government

    agencies

    Recent investors note this strength more emphatically than other groups They express that the support received from Chiles representatives from the Ambassador to

    CORFO was professional, proactive and effective in helping us establish in Chile

    Chiles Key Strengths Identified in Stakeholder Interviews

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    22/29

    22A.T. Kearney / 2007

    and of Chiles key challenges

    Limited Depth ofQualified Talent

    Strongest recurring theme is the shortage of English speakers, especially at non-professional levels There are only 10,000 graduates a year from Chiles universities Investors have difficulty finding talent to expand large operations, such as bilingual call centers, or

    certain BPO services

    High Cost of Talent

    Labor costs are higher in Chile than in competing countries in the region Inflated salary expectations from candidates for high-value added jobs, such as research analysts Many recognize that the cost differential is small, after accounting for the costs of corruption,

    lowered productivity due to bureaucracy, and other hidden costs in competing countries

    However, in low-value added services, such as traditional contact centers, some multinationals stillprefer to incur these risks and benefit from the cost arbitrage by locating in lower cost countries

    Limited Incentives(Tax, Capex,

    Training)

    Investors and non-investors mention that incentive programs typically do not figure in the decision tolocate in Chile, given their small scale

    Under current tax law, it is cumbersome and time consuming to receive reimbursement of VAT oncertain exported services; however the law is currently under review

    Investors and non-investors repeat that to make Chile more cost competitive, tax, capitalexpenditure and more significant training incentives could be offered

    IP Protection

    Enforcement of intellectual property protection laws is perceived to be lax

    In the biotech sector, for example, lack of coordination between the authorities which grant new drugapprovals and those which grant patents and trademarks in Chile, leads to the approval ofunauthorized copies of patented drugs

    SMEs express further concern given the perception of lack of political will to solve this issue

    InvestmentPromotionTargeting

    Investors, non-investors and some SMEs concur that the country image is not clear in theinternational community

    A lack of sector targeting and focus causes confusion among investors The strength of the country as a destination to their particular offshore service interest is unclear

    Chiles Key Weaknesses Identified in Stakeholder Interviews

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    23/29

    23A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Recommendations to OptimizeChiles Competitive Position

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    24/29

    24A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Four key themes emerge to optimize Chiles position as apreferred location for remote services

    1. Focus

    Given its small size and the competitive environment, Chile can not affordto compete in all segments of the remote services sector

    Chile must focus on those segments where it offers investors a clear value-proposition

    2. TargetedPromotion

    Having identified priority sectors, more targeted promotion is required tospecific sub-segments within these sectors This means development and distribution of more specific information on

    Chiles attributes in key target sectors, as well as prioritization of specificregions, industries and firms to be targeted

    3. Skills and

    Creativity

    The most important key to success in each of the priority sectors is going tobe to expand the quantity and quality of the skill-base eligible to work in

    the sector English language skills, relevant graduation rates, opennessand attractiveness to foreign knowledge workers, and so on

    4. BusinessEnvironment

    As this is Chiles key competitive advantage, like Singapore, Chile mustcontinuously seek to optimize all aspects of its business environment,particularly areas like Intellectual property protection and informationsecurity, infrastructure quality and costs, and regulatory efficiency

    Key Recommendations

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    25/29

    25A.T. Kearney / 2007

    1. Given relatively high costs and small size, Chile mustfocus on higher value-added or more risk-sensitive sectors

    KPO

    BPO

    IT Services

    Chiles Potential

    SectorAttractiveness

    Focus

    De-emphasize

    Invest

    Biotech R&D

    SharedServices

    Contact Centers

    Tech SupportCenters

    Focus on higher value-addedsectors; particularly inindustries where Chile has adistinctive trackrecord or skills,for example: Agribusiness and Mining Financial Services Retail and Consumer

    Emphasize low-risk, stableenvironment to attract captive

    shared service centers,requiring a mix of low- andhigh-level skills

    De-emphasize more cost-sensitive and language-dependent sectors such asbasic BPO and contact centers

    Comments/Highlights

    Framework for Prioritizing Offshore Segments

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    26/29

    26A.T. Kearney / 2007

    2. Within these sectors, a very targeted approach isrequired to promote Chiles attributes

    For target sectors, develop andmake readily available muchmore specific information onChiles key attributes:

    #/sources of relevant graduatesin relevant disciplines

    Special skill developmentinitiatives (universitypartnerships, etc.)

    Detailed cost information

    Fringes and taxesSpecific incentives

    Specific policy commitments(e.g. labor laws for ICT; IP forR&D, etc.)

    Set-up/Approval process/speed

    What

    Focus on promoting Chile asR&D, ITO and BPO location toindustries with affinity for Chile orexisting local skill-base:

    Agribusiness and Fisheries

    Mining, Forestry,

    Retail, Consumer

    Financial Services

    Focus on countries where Chilehas FTA

    Target specific firms most likelyto be seeking a Latin Americaservice center in the near future

    Identify and leverage Chilenoexpat connections in target firms

    Who

    Focus less on advertising, largetrade-shows and broad-brushbrochures; develop customizedpresentations for specific firms,laying out business case andproposition

    Find opportunities for individualdecision-makers visit Chile tosee for themselves theinfrastructure, stability, quality oflife, etc.

    Mobilize existing investors, localvendors and industryassociations as ambassadors

    Look at overall Chile branding does not adequately conveyattributes

    How

    Targeted Promotion Campaign

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    27/29

    27A.T. Kearney / 2007

    3. In all sectors, human capital development is absolutelycritical to success

    EnglishCompetency

    A critical weakness for Chile noticeably weaker than key regionalcompetitors at all levels from government and business leaders totechnical professionals to retail and hospitality

    Need multi-pronged approach more English throughout secondary andtertiary curriculum; study abroad opportunities; shorter immersion andcertification courses for target technical professionals, etc.

    TechnicalSkills

    Given small size and focus on higher value-added sectors, increasingquantity and quality of specific technical skill-profiles will be critical

    Specific profiles to be developed will depend on demands on specificcompanies. Key to is to ask companies what they need (as in Costa Rica,Singapore, Ireland), encourage universities to be flexible/responsive,provide targeted funding, develop short certification courses as well as fulldegrees to fill critical gaps

    Innovationand Creativity

    Success in higher value-added sectors like R&D and KPO depends onability to attract and retain creative knowledge workers. This requires notjust excellent education, but also a creative environment and culture

    Promote Chiles quality of life and environment as a key asset Permit/encourage foreign knowledge workers to work in Chile to act as

    catalysts for the development of knowledge clusters Stimulate arts, culture, openness sought by knowledge workers

    Key Areas for Improvement Human Capital

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    28/29

    28A.T. Kearney / 2007

    4. Finally, Chile must continuously improve its businessenvironment, as its key source of competitive advantage

    IP andInformation

    Security

    While better than most in Latin America and Asia, enforcement of IPR isstill perceived to be weak (particularly in pharma and bio sectors)

    Singapore, which also markets its safety and stability, takes proactivemeasures to reinforce this reputation, such as sponsoring new businesscontinuity ISO standard, encouraging information security certification, etc.

    Regulatoryand TaxBurden

    While better than most, investors still identify several areas whereregulatory environment could be made more conducive to remote servicesoperations, e.g. R&D approval processes, more flexible labor laws for ITOand BPO operations, VAT reimbursement on exported services, double taxtreaties with other countries in region (for shared service centers), etc.

    InfrastructureQuality and

    Costs

    Again, as a source of competitive advantage, quality and efficiency ofinfrastructure has to be continuously improved

    Continued investment, liberalization and competition must be promoted toexpand capacity and drive down costs of telecom, power, local transportand international air-links

    Key Areas for Improvement Business Environment

  • 8/8/2019 BPO in Chile_2007

    29/29

    29A.T. Kearney / 2007

    Thank you

    For further information, please contact:

    Simon Bell: [email protected]

    or

    Chris Callieri: [email protected]