bp presentation retirement benefits promises and challenges north shore, november 17 2015 20151111

34
Public Retirement Benefit Plans: Promises and Challenges North Shore Chapter, Illinois CPA Society, November 17, 2015 Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. Sr. Manager, Accounting Standards, Procedures, & Analysis TTX [email protected] 312.606.2516 - Office 847.224.6569 - Mobile Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Upload: barrett-peterson

Post on 12-Apr-2017

192 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Public Retirement Benefit Plans: Promises and Challenges

North Shore Chapter, Illinois CPA Society, November 17, 2015

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A.Sr. Manager, Accounting Standards, Procedures, & AnalysisTTX

[email protected] - Office847.224.6569 - Mobile

Page 2: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Retirement Plans’ Objectives

Income - Pension Health Insurance - OPEB Life Insurance - OPEB

Page 3: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

The Public Retirement Plan Environment

Electoral Politics State Laws and State Constitutions GASB – Governmental Accounting Standards Board SEC for Municipal Bond Issuers Rating Agencies for Municipal Bond Issuers U.S. ERISA Law and Regulations do NOT apply Cash Basis Budgeting, Accounting, and Reporting

Page 4: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Plan Design Issues Defined Benefit or Defined Contribution Targeted Benefit – usually % to pre-retirement income Time to Achieve Targeted Benefit Funding Sources, if funded

Employer/Taxpayer Contributions Employee Contributions Return on Assets

Income Re-Distribution Impacts in some Governmental Plans

PAYGO – Pay as You Go Plans Benefit and Pensionable Earnings Caps Retirement Age and Early Retirement Provisions

Page 5: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Some Fundamental Concepts/Terms Actuarial

PBO – Projected Benefit Obligation

AAL – Accumulated Benefits at Projected Pay

ABO – Accumulated Benefit Obligation

Period Cost Mortality Estimates Salary Increase Assumption Demographics

Spouse Life Marital Status Quits before retirement

Statistical/Financial NPV/Compounded Return Rule of 72 Discount Rate Return Assumption Funded Status Funded Ratio Fair Value of Assets Plan Fiduciary Net Position

Page 6: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Accounting Fundamentals

Estimating Amounts Ultimately Payable Assigning Costs to Annual Accounting Periods The Impact of Funding Practice Plan “Financial Position” – Funded Status – at Year end

Reflecting the Present Value of the Estimated Liability, net of Plan assets.

Page 7: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Accounting FundamentalsEstimating Amounts Ultimately Payable Benefit Formula

Credit Per year of Service Pay Basis – Final, Average, Etc.

Estimating Likely Service Terminations Re-Hires

Estimating Pay Increases Consider Compensation Policy, Inflation, Etc. Consider Promotions; Replacement Hires, Etc.

Mortality Assumptions Prior to Benefit eligibility Length of Benefit Payout Period Life Expectancy of Spouse/Partner

Page 8: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Accounting FundamentalsAssigning Costs to Annual Periods Basic Period Cost Formula

Normal/Service Cost Using Actuarial Method Selected, Plus

Interest on Present Value of Liability, Less Interest Computed Using Discount Rate

Assumed Return on Plan Assets, Plus Required to be “Reasonable”

Amortization of Actuarial Gains and Losses, Plus Typically Over Remaining Estimated Service Lives

Settlement or Curtailment Costs, Which We Will Assume Will Not Occur

Page 9: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Accounting FundamentalsThe Impact of Funding Policies The source of Plan Assets for Funded Plans Funding Sources

Employee - Optional Employer

ERISA Regulations for Corporate Sponsors, Typically Requiring Attainment of a Certain Funded Ratio

Annual Required Contribution Calculated by Actuaries for Public Plans, Which May be Over-Ridden by Law, as it is In Illinois. The Sum of Normal Cost Plus Amortization of Any Unfunded Amount

Funding Timing

Page 10: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Pension Accounting FundamentalsPlan Financial Position – Funded Status

Measuring the Estimated Present Value of the Estimated Liability PBO – Projected Benefit Obligations, which includes both future service

and future pay increases. Use required for companies. AAL – Actuarial Accrued Liability, which includes future pay increases, but

NOT future service. Used in Public Plans ABO – Accumulated Benefit Obligations, which reflects neither future

service nor future pay increases. A “freeze now” amount. Disclosure required for corporate plans.

Valuing Plan assets Market Value At Year end Actuarial Value

Funded Status – The Difference Between the PV of Liability Estimate and The Value of Plan Assets

Page 11: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

U.S Retirement Plans Issues

Social Security – a PAYGO Plan with an estimated unfunded liability of about $69.0 trillion

Medicare – a PAYGO Plan with an estimated unfunded liability of about $55.3 trillion

Military retirement Government Employees

Page 12: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Pension Plans - Summary

Page 13: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Pension Plans Summary

State of Illinois – 5 Plans TRS – Teacher’s

Retirement State Universities

Employees State Employees Judges General Assembly

Municipal – Many Plans Chicago Teachers IMRF – Illinois

Municipal Retirement Many Fire, Police,

Park District, and Other Agencies

Page 14: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Pension Plans, June 30, 2014Unfunded Present Value of BenefitsPlan Unfunded Liability

PVFunded Ratio

Teacher’s Retirement $ 61.6 billion 40.6%State Employees $ 26.2 billion 33.7%State Universities $ 21.6 billion 42.3%Judges $ 1.5 billion 31.6%General Assembly $ 0.2 billion 16.0% Total – All Plans $111.1 billion

Source: State of Illinois Comptroller, CAFR for Year Ended June 30, 2014

Page 15: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Pension Plans Financial Reporting GASB Statement No. 67, “Financial Reporting for Pension Plans”.

Governs reporting by the Plans themselves. This Statement is roughly analogous to FASB ASC 960 for Reporting by Defined Benefit Plans.

GASB Statement No. 68, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions”. This Statement is roughly analogous to FASB ASC 715 governing accounting and reporting by entities for their pension plans.

GASB Statement No.75, “Accounting and Financial Reporting for Post Employment Benefits Other than Pensions”, Effective for Fiscal Years starting after June 15, 2017. Reports not likely before 2019.

The FASB and GASB Standards are now closer together, but noticeable differences remain.

FASB ASC 960 also different in a number of important ways from ASC 715, as Plan reporting only has to address ABO, and requires use of a differently calculated discount rate.

Page 16: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Summary of Drivers of Low Funded Ratios

High Benefit Accumulation Rates, Increased in 1998 [2.2]

Retirement “Incentives” programs The COLA Benefit; introduction, increase, compounding Decades of Inadequate Funding by the State of Illinois High, and Unmet, Investment Return Assumptions Conceptual Design Flaw Requiring the State to Fund For

All Employers, Not Just State Employees. Revenues Go To Local Districts, While “Employer” Costs are Borne by the State. District Tax Rates Do NOT Contemplate Funding Pensions for Their Employees.

Page 17: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Teachers’ Retirement PlanA Detailed Review of TRS

Page 18: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

History of TRS Funded Status: 2000-2014Year Ended June 30 of:

Unfunded Liability Funded Ratio

2000 $11.4 billion 68.2%2001 $15.9 billion 59.5%2002 $20.7 billion 52.0%2003 $23.8 billion 49.3%2004 $19.4 billion 61.9%2005 $22.0 billion 60.8%2006 $22.4 billion 62.0%

2007 $23.7 billion 63.8%2008 $30.2 billion 56.0%2009 $35.0 billion 52.1%

2010 $39.9 billion 48.4%

2011 $43.5 billion 46.5%

2012 $52.1 billion 42.1%

2013 $55.7 billion 40.6%

2014 $61.6 billion 40.6%

Page 19: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

TRS’s Change in Unfunded Liability$ Billions: 2000 - 2014

2000-2007

2008-2014

Total

Employer Costs in excess of contributions $10.4 $13.3 $23.7Change in Actuarial assumptions and methods $ 3.1 $ 1.5 $ 4.6Salary increases over or (below) assumption $ 0.5 $(3.0) $(2.5)Return less than (more than)assumed return $(1.6) $23.6 $22.0Pension Bond Proceeds $(4.3) $ 0.0 $(4.3)Waiver of ERO Contributions for over 35 years $ 2.2 $ 0.0 $ 2.2All Other $ 4.9Total Increase (decrease) $50.6Unfunded Liability, June 30, 1999 $11.0Unfunded Liability, June 30, 2014 $61.6

Page 20: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

State Underfunding – A Chronic Disaster

Page 21: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Funded Ratio Confusion

GASB 67 Actuarial Assets

Fair Value of Assets

Pension Liability 106,682,654,886

103,740,377,000 103,740,377,000

Asset Value 45,824,382,514

42,150,785,000 45,824,382,514

Unfunded Liability

60,858,272,372

61,589,612,000 57,915,994,000

Funded Ratio 43.0% 40.6% 44.2%Unfunded Liability at Discount Rate of 6.5%

75,156,979,079 Likely Similar 75,156,979,079Approximately

Page 22: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Major TRS Benefits Provided Initial Tier I benefits are 2.2 times years of service times final average salary,

with a maximum benefit of 75% of final average salary. No dollar limit. Tier II has a creditable wage base tied to the 2010 Social Security Wage Base

Benefits are increased 3% per year, compounded. Compounding began in 1990. Original COLA [1969] was 1.5% per year simple, later 2%, then 3% simple, and finally compounded.

Retirement Age Requirements: Tier I Participants – Participating before January 1, 2011

At age 55 with 20 years, which may be reduced if less that 60, if an Early Retirement Option [ERO] is not available

At age 55 or older with 35 years with no reduction At age 60 and 10 years with no reduction At age 62 and 5 years of service with no reduction

Tier II Participants – Participating Subsequent to January 1, 2011 At age 67 with 10 or more years with no reduction At age 62, with a reduction of benefit of 6% for every year under age 67 No Early Retirement Option available

Page 23: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Compound Interest, and Rule of 72

Page 24: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Some Observations The rule of 72 suggests that a benefit will double at a 3% increase,

compounded, every 24 years. A teacher retiring at age 60 will double their benefit by age 84, a fairly likely age attainment.

Tier I participants can will reach their 75% limit after 34 years – about age 57 – after which benefit increases are driven only by increased salary on which the benefit is based. The system has an incentive to retire near 60, leaving retirement period of up to 30 years or more.

The compounding COLA has been estimated to account for about a third of the total liability. Reduction by half would improve the funding ratio by about 15 percentage points.

The Tier II limits on eligible salary and retirement age will make tier II benefits substantially less costly, although still subject to the COLA.

Employee contributions are 9.4% of their pay. Benefits paid in 2014 were $5.3 billion. Assets at year end can pay for

about 9 years. Employer costs of $5.3 billion are about 60% of member payroll paid of

$9.5 billion, an extremely high ratio.

Page 25: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Observations, Continued As of June 30, 2014 the Plan has 272.2 thousand participants, of which

111.3 thousand are retirees or survivors, most [101.2 thousand or 36% of total participants] retirees. Active participants are about 59% of total participants. A bit fewer that 10 thousand active participants are over 60. About 0.7% of participants are working past the 35 year limit.

The tier II modifications are very positive, but were adopted far too late to solve the Plan’s problems.

The Illinois supreme Court has ruled that the Constitution prohibits any changes to the Plan with an impact on current participants, active or retired.

Benefit payments of $5.3 billion in fiscal 2014 exceed contributions in fiscal 2014 by $0.8 billion, enabling existing assets to pay for up to 45 years as of June 30, 2014 values. The “spread” is likely to get worse as more participants retire.

Page 26: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Solution Options Reduce Benefit Costs, which will result in reduced

benefits for future [and current?] retirees. Reduce COLA to 1.5% or 2% - Prohibited? Establish Tier II rules for all Active Participants –

Prohibited? Allow School Districts to Provide Funded Supplemental Benefit Plans, if they Choose.

Freeze TRS As it Now Exists, and Institute a Defined Contribution Plan Of Some Sort for All New Hires

Pay more taxes somewhere State Income Taxes Local Taxes to Assume the Funding Obligation

Do Some of Both

Page 27: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Other Benefit Plans – A Few Words

State Teachers Health Insurance Plan Chicago Teachers Plan IMRF – Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Glenview Benefit Plans Police, Fire, and Park District, Generally

Page 28: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Illinois Teachers’ Health Insurance Security Fund - OPEB This “fund” has a net asset deficit of $80 million as of

December 31, 2013 The AAL as of December 31, 2013 was $19.5 billion. The TRS manages the Teachers’ Retirement Insurance

Program [TRIP]. OPEB disclosures not yet required – they are coming from GASB – so data is very limited.

Page 29: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Chicago Teachers’ Pension Fund – Pension and Health Insurance [OPEB]

$ Millions

Pension

OPEB Total

AAL – Present Value of Liability 20,316.9 1,938.9 22.255.8

Assets 10,815.7 36.0 10,851.7

Unfunded Liability 9,501.2 1,902.9 11,404.1

Funded Status Ratio 53.23% 1.86%Discount Rate/Return Assumption 7.75% 7.75%2014 Under-funded Contribution 134.4 100.1

234.5Plan Participants 63,194 63,143Covered Payroll 2,233.3 2,233.3Participant Contribution 9.0% 0.0%

Page 30: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

IMRF Plan Summary

Participants Benefits determined under Tier I if hired before 2011, and Tier II if hired on or after January, 2011, as in other Illinois State Plans.

Each participating municipal employer will have its own funded status based on the employees in its Plan, and the history of contributions.

Page 31: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

IMRF – Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund

$ Billions – December 31, 2014Pension OPEB TotalAAL – Present Value of Liability $37.4 $1.8 $39.2Assets – GASB/Fair Value $29.7 $0.0 $29.7Unfunded Liability $7.7 $1.8 $9.5Funded Status Ratio – GASB 79.3% 0.0%Funded Status - Actuarial 87.3% 0.0%Funded Status – Fair Value of Assets 93.0% 0.0%Discount Rate/Return Assumption 7.5% 7.5%Plan Participants 405,170Covered Payroll $6.7Participant Contribution 4.5%, 7.5%

Page 32: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Glenview, Illinois Plans’ Summary Tier I Participants – hired before January 1, 2011:

At age 50, with 20 years of service, benefit is 50% of salary Benefits accrue at 2.5% year from 20 to 30 years of service, and 1% thereafter to a

maximum of 75% Benefits are computed on salary on the last day of service Benefits receive a 3% COLA annually, compounded Participants contribute 4.50% of pay for IMRF, 9.91% for Police, and 9.9455% for Firefighters

Tier II Participants - hired on or after January 1, 2011: At age 55, with 10 or more years of service, benefit is 2.5% for each year of service, based

on a maximum salary for benefits of $106,800, increased annually thereafter. Participants with 10 years of service, but fewer than 20 years, can retire at age 60 with a

reduced benefit. Benefits receive an annual COLA adjustment of the lesser of 3% or one-half of the change in

the consumer price index, compounded. Participants contribute 4.50% of pay for IMRF, 9.91% for Police, and 9.9455% for Firefighters.

Page 33: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Glenview, Illinois Retirement Benefit Plans - $ MillionsDecember 31, 2014

IMRF Police Fire OPEB TotalJanuary 1, 2014 Valuation: Actuarial Liability [AAL] $50.1 $73.9 $77.0 $10.1 $211.1 Actuarial Asset Value $36.1 $60.6 $55.9 $0.0 $152.6 Funded Ratio

72.15%

82.02%

72.53%

0.0.% Earnings/Discount Rate 7.00% 7.25%

5.00%December 31, 2014 Valuation: Total Pension Liability $90.8 $104.3 N.A. $195.1 Plan Fiduciary Net Position $64.2 $65.3 $129.5 Funded Ratio 70.72% 62.44% Earnings/Discount Rate 6.44%

7.25% Actual Return for 2014 4.58%

6.95% Village Contribution % of Payroll

25.21%

29.36%

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Page 34: BP Presentation Retirement Benefits Promises and Challenges North Shore, November 17 2015 20151111

Barrett Peterson, C.P.A. ICPAS North Shore Chapter November 17, 2015

Comments on Other Plans

Some Police and Fire Plans are well funded. Many Police and Fire Plans, particularly Chicago, are

poorly funded