ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

To prepare this report various sources of information were investigated and researched. JR Cousin Consultants Ltd. (JRCC)

wishes to thank the site owner Keith Bowes who contributed to the data and content of this study. In addition, we wish to

commend Bowes Polar-King Homes Inc. for their fortitude in addressing the need for a long-term solution to wastewater

treatment for the Mobile Home Park.

REMARKS

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd. has conducted this environment act proposal in accordance with generally accepted

professional engineering principles and practices for the purpose of identifying conditions that may have an

environmental impact on the site. The findings and recommendations reached in this report are based on information

made available to JRCC during the investigation and conditions at the time of the site investigation. Conclusions derived in

this report are intended to reduce, but not wholly eliminate the uncertainty regarding potential environmental concerns on

the site, and recognizes reasonable limitations with regards to time, accuracy, work scope and cost. It is possible that

environmental conditions may change from the date of this report. If conditions appear different from those encountered

and expressed in this report, JRCC should be informed so that mitigation recommendations can be reviewed and adjusted

as required. Historical data and information obtained from personal communication used in this report, are assumed to be

correct, however JRCC has not conducted further investigations into the accuracy of this data. JRCC has produced this

report for the use of the client, and takes no responsibility for any third party decisions or actions based on information

contained in this report.

© Copyright JR Cousin Consultants Ltd., 2015 Information contained herein is confidential and may not be released to a third party without express permission of JR Cousin

Consultants Ltd.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page of Section

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSAL FORM ........................................................................................................... 1 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................... 1 

1.0  INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 1 1.1  Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2  Contact Information ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3  Background Information .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.4  Description of Previous Studies .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.5  Project Description ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 

2.0  DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................................... 1 2.1  Land Title/Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.2  Owner of Land and Mineral Rights .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.3  Existing Land Use .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.4  Land Use Designation/Zoning Designation ............................................................................................................... 2 2.5  Description of Development ........................................................................................................................................ 2 

2.5.1  Project Schedule ............................................................................................................................................ 2 2.5.2  Basis for Proposed Lagoon Upgrading Site Selection .............................................................................. 2 2.5.3  Lagoon Effluent Disposal .............................................................................................................................. 3 

2.5.3.1  Application Rates ....................................................................................................................... 4 

2.5.3.2  Separation Distances ................................................................................................................ 5 

2.5.3.3  Water Quality ............................................................................................................................... 5 

2.5.3.4  Irrigation Equipment .................................................................................................................. 6 

2.5.3.5  Operation of Irrigation System ................................................................................................. 6 

2.5.4  Lagoon Access ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.5.5  Population Contributing Effluent ................................................................................................................. 7 2.5.6  Wastewater Production ................................................................................................................................ 7 

2.5.6.1  Organic Loading .......................................................................................................................... 7 

2.5.6.2  Hydraulic Loading ...................................................................................................................... 8 

2.5.7  Existing Lagoon Assessment and Capacity .............................................................................................. 8 2.5.7.1  Lagoon Assessment .................................................................................................................. 9 

2.5.7.2  Existing Organic Capacity ......................................................................................................... 9 

2.5.7.3  Existing Hydraulic Storage Capacity ....................................................................................... 9 

2.5.8  Lagoon Expansion Requirements ............................................................................................................... 9 2.5.9  Topography and Geotechnical Investigation ......................................................................................... 10 

2.5.9.1  Topography .............................................................................................................................. 10 

2.5.9.2  Past Geotechnical Data .......................................................................................................... 10 

2.5.9.3  Site Investigation .................................................................................................................... 11 

2.5.9.4  Laboratory Analysis ................................................................................................................ 12 

2.5.10  Lagoon Liner Design Guidelines ............................................................................................................... 14 2.5.11  Typical Lagoon Liner Construction Options ............................................................................................ 14 2.5.12  Proposed Lagoon Expansion Liner Design ............................................................................................. 14 2.5.13  Review of Regulatory Requirements ....................................................................................................... 15 

Section Page of Section 2.5.13.1  Organic Loading ....................................................................................................................... 15 

2.5.13.2  Hydraulic Loading ................................................................................................................... 15 

2.5.13.3  Lagoon Liner ............................................................................................................................ 16 

2.5.13.4  Effluent Quality Requirements ............................................................................................. 16 

2.5.14  Nutrient Management Plan ....................................................................................................................... 16 2.5.15  Expanded Lagoon Design Requirements ................................................................................................ 16 

2.5.15.1  Primary Cell .............................................................................................................................. 17 

2.5.15.2  Storage Cell ............................................................................................................................... 17 

2.5.15.3  Summary of Selected Design Criteria .................................................................................. 17 

2.5.16  Lagoon Construction Details ..................................................................................................................... 18 2.5.17  Decommissioning ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2.5.18  Lagoon Maintenance .................................................................................................................................. 19 

3.0  POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................................................. 1 3.1  Releases to Air, Water, Land ........................................................................................................................................ 1 

3.1.1  Air ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 3.1.2  Water ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 3.1.3  Land ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 

3.2  Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 3.3  Fisheries .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 3.4  Forestry ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.5  Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.6  Noise Impacts ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 3.7  Health and Safety .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.8  Heritage Resources ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.9  Socio-Economic Implications ...................................................................................................................................... 4 3.10  Aesthetics ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 

4.0  MANAGEMENT PRACTICE .................................................................................................................. 1 4.1  Mitigation of Impacts to Air .......................................................................................................................................... 1 4.2  Mitigation of Impacts to Water .................................................................................................................................... 1 4.3  Mitigation of Impacts to Land ...................................................................................................................................... 2 4.4  Mitigation of Noise Impacts ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4.5  Mitigation of Impacts to Health and Safety ............................................................................................................... 3 4.6  Mitigation of Impacts to Heritage Resources ........................................................................................................... 3 

5.0  RESIDUAL AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS .............................................................................................. 1 

6.0  MONITORING AND FOLLOW-UP ......................................................................................................... 1 

7.0  FUNDING AND APPROVALS ............................................................................................................... 1 

8.0  PUBLIC CONSULTATION .................................................................................................................... 1 

9.0  CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 1 

Appendix A

Land Title

Crown Lands & Property Agency - Lands Branch, May 9, 2014 Email Correspondence

Appendix B

Table 1: Bowes Mobile Home Park Lagoon - Population, Hydraulic, and Organic Loading Projections to Design Year 20

Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship - Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, April 14, 2014 Email

Correspondence

Manitoba Tourism, Culture, Sport, and Consumer Protection – Historic Resources Branch, June 16, 2014 Email

Correspondence

Appendix C

Test Hole Logs

National Testing Laboratories Ltd. Soils Analysis Report, September 11, 2013

Driller’s Well Logs

Appendix D

Title Page

Plan L1: Existing Lagoon and Test Hole Location Plan

Plan L2: Expanded Lagoon with Setbacks

Plan L3: Proposed Lagoon Expansion Layout Plan

Plan L4: Dike Details

Plan L5: Silt Fence, Valve, Valve Marker and Rip Rap Details

E

EXECUTIVE S

Gene

The si

for the

constr

the en

Desc

The ex

the Bo

storag

the ex

organ

Popu

The pr

Bowes

approx

projec

Lago

The t

40.0 k

collect

Based

lagoon

22,52

storag

Lago

Based

lagoon

would

have a

period

Topog

The g

gener

SUMMARY

eral

te owner (Bow

e Bowes Mobil

ruction and op

ngineering serv

cription

xisting Bowes w

owes Mobile H

ge cell to the w

xisting second

ic and hydraul

lation Contr

rojected year 2

s Mobile Hom

ximately 3.3%

cted design ye

on Loading

otal projected

kg BOD5/day, w

tion system.

d on an average

n would be ap

5 m3 in design

ge cell.

on Capacity

d on a review

n expanded pr

be more than

a minimum tot

d in design yea

graphical Su

eneral area of

ally slopes tow

wes Polar-King

e Home Park. A

peration of the

vices.

wastewater tr

ome Park. The

west and north

dary cell to fo

ic capacity of t

ributing Efflu

20 population

e Park. The m

%, based on th

ar 20 populatio

d design yea

which consider

e hydraulic loa

pproximately 9

n year 20, for 2

of the existin

rimary cell wou

n sufficient for

tal hydraulic s

ar 20, based on

urvey and Ge

f the propose

wards the nort

g Homes Inc.)

An Environme

proposed exp

eatment lagoo

e most feasibl

hwest of the ex

orm an expand

the expanded

uent

used for sizing

mobile home p

he projected n

on from the pip

r 20 organic

rs average dail

ading rate of 46

98 m3/day. Th

230 days of win

ng lagoon desi

uld have an or

r the projected

storage capaci

n the projected

eotechnical

d lagoon expa

th and an elev

is proposing t

nt Act Licence

anded lagoon.

on is in need o

e option cons

xisting lagoon

ded primary c

lagoon site.

g the expanded

park populatio

number of fut

ped collection

loading to t

ly loading from

66 L/home/da

herefore, the

nter storage, w

ign parameter

rganic loading

d organic loadi

ty of 22,525 m

d hydraulic load

Investigatio

ansion was re

vation differen

o expand the e

e will be require

. JR Cousin Co

f expansion du

idered was lag

cells, and to c

cell. These wo

d lagoon consi

on is projected

ture lots in th

system in the

the lagoon pr

m the mobile h

y, the projecte

lagoon would

which was utiliz

rs and the pro

capacity of a

ngs in design

m3, which wou

dings.

on

elatively flat t

ce of approxim

existing waste

ed from Manito

onsultants Ltd.

ue to the propo

goon expansio

combine the e

rks would be

ists of the resi

d to experienc

he mobile hom

e mobile home

rimary cell w

ome park resi

ed design year

require a tota

zed in design f

oposed lagoon

pproximately

year 20. The

uld be sufficien

to gently slop

mately 0.18 m

ewater treatme

oba Conservat

. (JRCC) was re

osed future ex

n by construc

existing primar

required to e

dential popula

ce an annual

me park. Ther

park is 525 pe

would be app

dents through

r 20 hydraulic

al hydraulic c

for sizing the n

n expansion d

44.1 kg BOD5/

expanded lag

nt for a 230 da

ing grassland

m was observe

I

ent lagoon

tion for the

etained for

pansion of

ting a new

ry cell with

xpand the

ation in the

growth of

refore, the

eople.

roximately

h the piped

load to the

apacity of

new lagoon

design, the

/day which

goon would

ay storage

. The land

d from the

south

0.06%

The ge

plastic

plastic

mediu

record

stand

Based

6.1 x 1

Lago

Based

new s

condu

cm/se

Nutri

As rec

Decemreduct

can be

to sev

condit

greate

which

source

recom

end of the ex

).

eneral soil pro

c organic clay

c, silty clay do

um plastic clay

ded in all of th

ing water was

d on the labora

10-6 cm/sec.

on Liner

d on the on-site

torage cell be

uctivity of the

ec after rework

ent Manage

commended i

mber 2006, la

tion in waterbo

e utilized for p

veral actively

tions). The us

est concern w

can lead to sa

e of sodium in

mmendation to

xpansion area

file at the exp

down to appro

wn to approxim

y. Refusal or

he test holes

observed at gr

atory analysis,

e geotechnica

constructed o

soils in the ex

king, as require

ement Plan

n the Lake W

and applicatio

odies of the La

lant growth as

growing cerea

se of effluent

ith effluent irr

alinization of th

n drinking wa

not utilize sod

to the north

ansion site co

oximately 0.4 m

mately 1.3 m –

bedrock was

at depths ran

reater depths w

the layer of h

l investigation

of reworked cla

xpansion area

ed by Manitoba

Winnipeg Stew

n of effluent

ake Winnipeg W

s opposed to r

al, forage or oi

irrigation can

rigation typica

he soils and re

ter. The propo

dium based wa

end over a dis

nsisted of a th

m – 1.1 m belo

– 3.0 m below t

not encounte

nging from the

with greater d

igh plastic silt

and laborator

ay soils from t

a would achiev

a Conservation

wardship Board

through irriga

Watershed. It

eleasing into s

ilseed crops, o

reduce the r

lly pertains to

duction in crop

onent will be

ater softeners.

stance of 286

hin layer of top

ow the surface

the surface, fo

ered at any of

e surface, to 1

istance from t

ty clay had an

ry analysis, it i

he site excava

ve a hydraulic

n for clay lined

d – Report toation is consi

is preferable t

surrounding w

or on grasslan

equirements f

o wastewater w

p production.

encouraged t

m (a surface

psoil followed

e. Below was a

ollowed by alte

f the test hole

1.0 m below t

he existing lag

in-situ hydrau

s proposed th

ation. It is exp

conductivity

lagoons.

o the Ministeridered to be

to retain nutri

aterways. The

nds utilized fo

for inorganic f

which contain

Water softene

o inform mob

e slope of appr

by a layer of b

a consistent la

ernating layers

es. Standing

the surface. I

goon.

ulic conductivit

at the lagoon

pected that the

value less tha

r of Water Ste one option fo

ents on land w

e effluent can

r grazing (und

fertilizers on

s high levels o

ers are typicall

ile home own

II

roximately

black, high

yer of high

s of silt and

water was

In general,

ty value of

liner in the

e hydraulic

an 1 x 10-7

ewardship, or nutrient

where they

be applied

der certain

crops. The

of sodium,

y the main

ners of the

1

1.0 INTR

The de

Mobile

1.1

1.2

1.3

ODUCTION A

evelopment de

e Home Park, in

Introduct

The site ow

wastewate

accommod

required fr

expansion.

Contact In

Mr. Jeff Dyc

JR Cousin C

91A Scurfie

Winnipeg, M

R3Y 1G4

Phone: (20

Mr. Keith Bo

Bowes Pola

PO Box 640

Portage la P

R1N 3C2

Phone: (20

Backgrou

The Bowes

TransCanad

site is locat

1 and High

residential

currently s

pumping in

The Bowes

cell of com

Environmen

Environmen

discharges

AND BACKG

escribed herein

n the Parish of

ion

wner Mr. Keith

r treatment la

ate the future

rom Manitoba

JR Cousin Con

nformation

ck, P.Eng.

Consultants Ltd

eld Boulevard

Manitoba

4) 489-0474,

owes

ar-King Homes

0

Prairie, Manito

4) 857-7888,

und Informat

Mobile Home

da Highway, in

ted on River Lo

hway 26. The

population w

serviced with a

to the lagoon p

wastewater tr

pacted clay so

nt Commission

ntal Act Licen

via spray irrig

ROUND

n is for the exp

f High Bluff, Ma

h Bowes, of Bo

agoon for the

e proposed gr

Conservation

nsultants Ltd.

d.

Fax (204) 489

Inc.

ba

Fax (204) 239

tion

Park is locate

n the Parish of

ot 33, approxim

service popu

ithin the mob

a gravity sew

primary cell.

reatment lagoo

oils. The lagoo

n (file 2738.0

nce will be r

gation to the s

pansion of the

anitoba.

owes Polar-Kin

e Bowes Mobi

rowth of the m

n for the con

(JRCC) was re

9-0487

9-6220

d approximate

f High Bluff. T

mately 300 m

lation utilizing

bile home par

er collection s

on was constru

on is currently

), issued in 19

equired for c

urrounding ag

existing waste

ng Homes Inc.

le Home Park

mobile home

nstruction and

tained for the

ely 5.7 km eas

The existing la

north of the m

g the wastewa

k. The residen

system, with

ucted in 1986

y being operat

986. Due to th

onstruction a

gricultural land

ewater treatme

., is proposing

k. A lagoon ex

park. An Envi

d operation o

related engine

st of Portage la

goon and prop

mobile home pa

ater treatment

nts within the

four lift statio

with one prim

ted under Orde

he proposed la

and operation

d, once per yea

ent lagoon for

g to expand th

xpansion is re

ronment Act

of the propos

eering services

a Prairie, Manit

posed lagoon

ark, in betwee

t lagoon will in

e mobile home

ons and two f

mary cell and on

er No. 1109 of

agoon expans

. This lagoon

ar in the fall. B

1 - 1

the Bowes

he existing

equired to

Licence is

ed lagoon

s.

toba along

expansion

n Highway

nclude the

e park are

forcemains

ne storage

f the Clean

ion, a new

currently

Based on a

1.4

1.5

planned ex

expansion t

Descripti

The 2013 g

soil conditi

indicated th

clay, and a

the test hol

sample ind

situ state.

of the lagoo

The origina

site conditi

details. The

people. The

permeabilit

Project De

The existin

expansion

Parish of Hi

storage cel

cell with th

constructe

to be throug

pansion of the

to increase ca

on of Previo

geotechnical in

ons considere

hat the soil pro

lternating laye

les from the su

icated that the

Therefore a lin

on expansion l

l lagoon propo

ions, the traile

e original lago

e lagoon was c

ty results with

escription

g Bowes wast

of the Bowes M

igh Bluff, north

l to the west a

he existing se

d of reworked

gh effluent irri

e mobile home

pacity.

us Studies

nvestigation re

ed in the prop

ofile consisted

ers of silt and

urface to 1.0 m

e soils would n

ner of reworke

iner.

sal submitted

er park infrastr

oon was sized

constructed w

in the required

tewater treatm

Mobile Home P

h of the mobile

and northwest

econdary cell

clay soils from

gation onto th

e park to the n

eport by JRCC w

osed expansio

d of topsoil, fol

medium plasti

m below the su

not be suitable

ed and re-comp

by JRCC in 19

ructure, contri

to service 64

ith compacted

d environment

ment lagoon is

Park. The lago

e home park. T

t of the existin

to form an e

m the site exc

e surrounding

orth, the wast

was reviewed f

on area. Test

llowed by high

ic clay. Stand

rface. Hydraul

e to use in line

pacted soils w

85 was also re

buting service

4 trailer units

d clay soils fro

al guidelines.

s in need of e

oon expansion

The lagoon exp

ng lagoon cells

xpanded prim

avation. The la

g agricultural la

tewater treatm

for background

holes at the p

h plastic organ

ing groundwat

ic conductivity

r construction

was recommen

eviewed for bac

e populations a

with an estim

m the site exc

expansion due

is to be locate

pansion will inc

s, and to comb

mary cell. The

agoon effluent

ands.

ment lagoon is

d information

proposed expa

nic clay, high p

ter was record

y of a represen

n in an undistu

ded for the co

ckground infor

and lagoon co

mated populati

cavation, which

e to the propo

ed on River Lo

clude construc

bine the existin

expansion ce

t discharge wi

1 - 2

in need of

onsite and

ansion site

lastic silty

ed in all of

ntative soil

urbed or in-

nstruction

rmation on

nstruction

ion of 225

h achieved

sed future

t 33 in the

cting a new

ng primary

ll is to be

ll continue

2

2.0 DESC

For ea

repeat

2.1

2.2

2.3

CRIPTION OF

ach heading th

ted herein in it

Land Title

Certificate will be cons

map or map

The existing

of the exist

the propose

lagoon expa

expansion l

Owner of

Owner of la

the land, if

Based upon

Polar-King

regarding t

CLPA, the m

interest. Re

Existing L

Existing lan

use for the

The propos

This parcel

south, nort

the expans

with grass c

Soil would b

dikes and li

F THE DEVEL

here is an info

talics followed

e/Location

of Title showinstructed; or, in

ps at a scale n

g lagoon is loc

ting lagoon, als

ed expansion.

ansion is prop

layout is includ

Land and Mi

and upon which

different from

n the certificat

Inc. The Crow

he ownership

mines and min

efer to the CLP

Land Use

nd use on the

purposes of th

ed lagoon exp

of land is cur

h and further w

ion area was a

cover, used as

be excavated i

iners (vertical

LOPMENT

rmation reque

by the pertain

ng the owner(n the case of

o less than 1:5

cated on River

so within Rive

A copy of the

osed is attach

ded in Append

ineral Rights

h the developm

surface owner

e of title for th

wn Lands &

of the mines

nerals, sand a

PA email corres

site and on lan

he developmen

pansion site is

rently used as

west was agric

also agricultur

s an airstrip for

n the area of t

and horizonta

est from the E

ning response.

s) and legal d highways, rai

50,000 showin

Lot 33. The pr

r Lot 33. Bow

current Certifi

ed in Appendix

ix D.

s

ment is intend

r:

e proposed lag

Property Agen

and minerals

nd gravel are

spondence for

nd adjoining it

nt:

the land direc

s grassland fo

cultural land be

ral land used fo

r a small crop d

the proposed l

l).

nvironment Ac

description of til lines, electric

ng the location

oposed lagoon

es Polar-King

cate of Title (N

x A. The locatio

ded to be const

goon expansio

ncy (CLPA) w

on the propert

owned with th

May 9, 2014, i

t, as well as ch

ctly west and n

r hay product

eing used for c

or crop produc

dusting airplan

agoon expans

ct Proposal Fo

the land upon cal transmiss

n of the propos

n expansion w

Homes Inc. cu

No. 2439563) f

on of the exist

tructed, and of

on area, the su

was contacted

ty. Based on

he surface titl

in Appendix A.

hanges that w

northwest of t

ion, while the

crop production

ction, along wit

ne.

sion, for constr

orm. These req

which the devion lines, or p

ed developme

ill be located t

urrently owns t

for the land on

ing lagoon and

f mineral right

rface is owned

d to provide c

information p

e and the Crow

will be made in

the existing lag

surrounding l

n. The land to t

th a cleared st

ruction of the l

2 - 1

quests are

velopment ipelines, a

ent:

o the west

the land of

n which the

d proposed

ts beneath

d by Bowes

comments

rovided by

wn has no

such land

goon cells.

and to the

the east of

trip of land

lagoon cell

2.4

2.5

Land Use

Land use dThe Plannin

if applicable

The lagoon

Portage la P

Descripti

Descriptiondates for

terminationapplicable (

2.5.1 Pr

Th

En

mo

co

No

co

inf

2.5.2 Ba

Th

co

de

ex

Ma

Ob

Ju

ea

Ta

Gu

L

f

Designation

designation forng Act or The C

e:

expansion si

Prairie.

on of Develo

n of proposed planning, des

n of operation (e.g. access ro

oject Schedu

e lagoon expa

nvironment Act

obile home pa

mpletion of co

o date for deco

nducted when

frastructure wi

asis for Propo

e location for

nsidering prox

evelopment in

isting infrastru

anitoba Conse

bjectives for St

ly 1985) are o

ch of the guide

ble A: Locati

uidelines

Manito

Lagoons must

rom any comm

n/Zoning De

r the site and aCity of Winnipeg

te is zoned as

opment

development sign, construc

(if known), ideoad, airstrip, pr

ule

ansion design

t Licence. Lag

ark. Commiss

onstruction an

ommissioning t

n the lagoon a

ill continue to

osed Lagoon

r lagoon expa

ximity to the e

the mobile ho

ucture.

rvation’s guide

tandard Sewa

outlined in the

elines is also p

on of Propose

oba Conservat

be located a m

munity centre.

esignation

adjoining landg Act, and the

s A80 (agricu

and schedule ction, commis

entifying majorocessing facil

and construct

goon expansio

ioning and op

nd after approv

the lagoon has

approaches th

be utilized.

Upgrading Sit

nsion was ch

existing mobile

me park, prox

elines for the

ge Lagoons, P

e following tab

provided in the

ed Lagoon Exp

tion Guideline

minimum of 46

d as identified zoning design

ltural), based

for stages of ssioning, oper

or componentslity, waste disp

tion works are

on is required

peration of th

val for use is o

s been set, how

e year 20 des

te Selection

hosen based o

e home park a

ximity to adjac

location of a w

Province of Ma

ble. A descript

table.

pansion Site i

0 m The

loc

nea

Pra

in a developmnation as ident

on zoning de

the developmration, and de

s and activitiesposal area, etc

proposed to b

prior to the pl

e lagoon is p

obtained from

wever a lagoon

sign life. The e

on discussion

nd residential

ent property b

wastewater tre

anitoba, Envir

tion of the pro

n Relation to

Proposed

e proposed lag

ated approxim

arest commun

airie).

ment plan adoptified in a zoni

esignations in

ment, includingecommissionin

s of the develoc.).

begin upon rec

lanned expans

proposed to b

Manitoba Con

n assessment

existing lagoon

ns with the la

lots, proximity

boundaries, an

eatment lagoo

ronmental Man

oposed site in

Manitoba Con

Relation to Sit

goon expansion

mately 6 km fro

ity centre (Po

2 - 2

pted under ing by-law,

the RM of

g proposed ng and/or

opment as

ceipt of an

sion of the

egin upon

nservation.

t should be

n cells and

nd owner,

y to future

nd utilizing

on (Design nagement,

relation to

nservation

te

n area is

om the

rtage la

L

fr

m

C

p

a

S

la

A

S

c

p

o

1

g

s

Th

Ma

the

sh

res

od

the

the

no

pa

2.5.3 La

Th

su

ow

Manito

Lagoons must

rom any reside

measured from

Consideration s

prevailing wind

areas.

Sites with an un

agoon are pref

Areas that are h

Sewage lagoon

constructed su

proposed lagoo

of soil having a

1 x 10-7 cm/sec

groundwater co

soils, a flexible

e lagoon exp

anitoba Conse

ere are no exp

ows the mini

sidences and

ours to drift to

e location and

e nearest pota

orthwest of the

rk receives wa

agoon Effluen

e expanded la

rrounding agri

wner. The soils

oba Conservat

be located a m

ence. (The dist

m the centreline

should be give

ds are in the dir

nobstructed w

ferred.

habitually floo

s are to be des

uch that the int

on is underlain

hydraulic con

c or less. In are

ontamination o

synthetic line

ansion area i

rvation and in

pected concer

mum setback

the commun

owards the mo

proximity of t

able water wel

e mobile home

ater from a reg

nt Disposal

goon would co

icultural land t

s in the existin

tion Guideline

minimum of 300

tance is to be

e of the neares

n to sites in w

rection of unin

wind sweep acr

ded shall be av

signed and

terior surface o

by at least on

ductivity of

eas sensitive t

or without suit

r may be utiliz

is located bey

an area that m

rns for the loc

k distance req

ity. The preva

obile home par

he lagoon to t

l is the former

e park. Howev

gional system.

ontinue to utili

to the west, ea

g effluent irrig

0 m

st dike).

The

loc

res

hich

nhabited

The

the

lag

and

oss the The

loc

agr

voided. The

not

floo

lag

at t

the

loc

app

gro

of the

e metre

o

able

zed.

As t

pro

les

rew

will

rew

con

yond all spec

meets other pr

ation of the e

uirements for

ailing winds h

rk residents du

he residents.

mobile home

ver this well is

ze effluent irri

ast, south and

gation area are

Proposed

e proposed lag

ated 300 m fro

sidence.

e prevailing win

e north and we

oon expansion

d west of the m

e proposed lag

ated in an ope

ricultural land.

e proposed lag

t located in an

oded. The dike

oon expansion

the same eleva

e existing lagoo

ated at an elev

proximately 3.

ound surface.

the excavated

ovide a consist

s than 1 x 10-7

worked, the lag

l be lined with

worked and com

ntainment.

cified setback

ovincial siting

xpansion cell.

r the expande

ave the poten

uring the sprin

While not desc

park well, loca

no longer in u

igation via a sp

north that is a

e considered to

Relation to Sit

goon expansion

om the neares

nds are typica

st. The propos

n site is locate

mobile home pa

goon expansion

n area surroun

goon expansion

area that is ha

es of the propo

n would be con

ation as the dik

on cells, which

vation of

7 m above the

soils at the sit

ent permeabil

cm/sec when

goon expansion

a minimum 1 m

mpacted soil to

k distances re

requirements

Plan L2 in A

ed lagoon to t

ntial to cause

ng thawing per

cribed in the ta

ated approxima

use as the mo

prinkler system

lso owned by t

o be a clay typ

2 - 3

te

n area is

t

lly from

sed

d north

ark.

n area is

nded by

n area is

abitually

sed

nstructed

kes of

h are

e existing

te can

ity of

n cells

m thick

o provide

equired by

, therefore

ppendix D,

he nearby

e nuisance

iod, due to

able above

ately 1 km

obile home

m, into the

the lagoon

pe soil with

me

rat

at

the

2.5

edium to high

te would be no

the site. The

e requirement

5.3.1 Applic

Based

Applicsprin

while

lagoo

plast

The E

value

efficie

This

150 m

Consi

requi

the fo

The e

As th

value

requi

The c

plasticity. The

o larger than 1

primary reaso

s for adequate

cation Rates

d on informa

cation of Treakler applicatio

that for mediu

on site the soil

icity, therefore

Environment Ca

e, D (mm) and

ency factor of

D = M/0.80.

particular reg

mm. Entering t

D = 150/0.80

ideration mus

rement value

ollowing conve

Alfalfa and Cl

Soft Wheat

Hard Wheat

Oats and Bar

Grass

quation theref

D = kM/0.80.

e most likely

e for alfalfa a

rement, D, bec

D = 1.2 (187

orresponding

A = V/10D.

previous lago

.8 x 10-4 cm/s

on for irrigation

e crop irrigation

ation provided

ated Municipaon rates for fin

um to coarse t

type conside

e the rate of ap

anada docume

d the moisture

0.80, which al

gion of Manito

this value into

0 = 187.5 mm.

t be given to t

can be determ

ersion factors (

over 1.20

0.80

0.75

rley 0.65

1.00

fore becomes:

crops to be ir

nd clover equ

comes:

.5) = 225 mm.

land area requ

on proposal in

ec or 0.65 cm/

n is to dispose

n.

d in the Env

l Wastewater ne textured so

extured soils i

red for effluen

pplication of th

ent uses the a

e deficit value

lows for evapo

oba has a mo

the equation y

the type of cr

mined for othe

(k):

rrigated will be

uals 1.2 and

uired is calcula

ndicated that th

/hour, based o

e of the liquid e

vironment Can

and Sludge (oils are betwe

s between 1.0

nt disposal, is

he effluent was

nnual gross p

e for a region,

oration, in the f

isture deficit

yields a value

rop produced.

er crops by mu

e alfalfa and o

therefore ann

ted using the f

he maximum a

on the fine text

effluent and n

nada Manual (1984), the a

en 0.5 and 1.

and 1.7 cm/h

a clay type so

s chosen at 0.5

recipitation re

M (mm) alon

following equa

value of app

for D of:

The gross pre

ultiplying D fo

other forage cr

nual gross pre

following equa

2 - 4

application

tured soils

ot to meet

for Land ppropriate

0 cm/hour

our. At the

oil with low

5 cm/hour.

quirement

ng with an

ation:

roximately

ecipitation

r grass by

rops, the k

ecipitation

ation:

2.5

2.5

Wher

waste

Due t

deal

comp

disch

of the

to the

waste

area r

Bowe

mobil

for th

taken

Food

400 m

Saska

appro

225 m

make

5.3.2 Separ

It is p

any a

on th

tree l

5.3.3 Water

Wate

for irr

e A is the lan

ewater for irrig

to the lagoon b

of flexibility i

plete. The sys

harge period (i.

e amount of lan

e annual hydra

ewater for irrig

required for th

A = 22,525/1

es Polar-King In

le home park.

his area of Man

n at the Portag

and Rural De

mm to 450 mm

atchewan Min

oximately 660

mm of irrigatio

es the growth o

ration Distance

proposed that a

adjacent munic

ere being a su

ine separation

r Quality

r quality param

rigation include

Salinity – s

Permeabili

Adsorption

Toxicity –

cause tox

lagoon sou

Nutrients

requireme

nutrients i

nd area meas

gation (m3) and

being designe

in the timing

stem could be

.e. dry periods

nd required, an

aulic loading in

gation will be

e design year

10(225) = 10.0

nc. owns 185

The total aver

nitoba, accord

ge la Prairie w

evelopment, fo

m of precipitati

nistry of Agr

0 mm of water

on added to the

of alfalfa pract

es

all irrigation la

cipal or provin

uitable tree lin

n, a setback dis

meters that ne

e:

salt accumulat

ity – soil pe

n Ration (SAR)

accumulation

icity in the p

urce

– application

nts for comm

n the effluent

sured in hecta

d D is the gross

d for a year 2

of irrigation

managed to

s) as site cond

n assumption

n year 20 will b

22,525 m3 (s

20 hydraulic lo

0 ha of land gro

acres (74.8 h

rage rainfall fro

ing to Environ

weather statio

orage crops s

on for the grow

riculture repo

r for growth th

e 345 mm of a

ical in this loca

and be located

cial roads. Th

ne separation

stance of 150

eed to be con

tion in the root

rmeability ca

in the wastew

of ions such

plants, howeve

n of nutrient

mercial fertiliz

from a residen

ares (ha), V is

s precipitation

0 hydraulic lo

until the mob

irrigate during

itions best dic

of yearly irriga

e made. The d

storage capaci

oad was theref

owing alfalfa a

a) of land surr

om May 1 to S

nment Canada

n. According

such as alfalfa

wing season o

orts that Alf

hrough the sa

average rainfa

ation.

with a minimu

is buffer zone

in the buffer z

m is proposed

sidered when

t zone can dec

n be reduced

ater

as boron, nic

er this is unli

s from wast

zers. Overloa

ntial lagoon is u

s the annual

n requirement.

oad, there will

bile home exp

g particular tim

ctate. For dete

ation volume b

design year 20

ity of lagoon).

fore calculated

nd clover

rounding the l

eptember 30 i

’s precipitation

to Manitoba A

a require app

f May to Septe

falfa typically

me period of

ll equals 570 m

um 100 m buff

is proposed, c

zone. Where t

.

utilizing lagoo

rease crop yie

d from a hig

ckel or other m

ikely from a

ewater can o

ding forage c

unlikely

2 - 5

volume of

be a great

pansion is

mes of the

ermination

being equal

0 volume of

. The land

d to be:

agoon and

is 345 mm

n readings

Agriculture,

roximately

ember. The

y requires

time. The

mm, which

fer zone to

contingent

there is no

on effluent

lds

gh Sodium

metals can

residential

offset the

crops with

2.5

2.5

5.3.4 Irrigat

The s

efflue

5.3.5 Opera

The o

consi

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Bacteria –

frame betw

potential f

tion Equipmen

ite owner has

ent irrigation fr

A mobile, c

System is

mechanica

Nozzles ca

Nozzles pr

Pump is p

350 kPa

Measured

ation of Irrigati

operation of th

ists of the follo

1. Restrict th

spray is no

property n

2. No direct r

Irrigation is

3. The nozzle

operator w

to prevent

4. The system

location.

5. The area b

effluent in

6. The owner

or silage co

7. Irrigation

harvesting

8. The lagoon

capacity e

restrictions a

ween irrigatio

or bacterial co

nt

existing irrigat

rom the lagoon

centre pivot sp

approximately

ally moved

apable or disch

roduce minima

ortable 100 m

application rat

ion System

e effluent irrig

owing:

he effluent irrig

ot to be carrie

ot owned or co

runoff or pond

s not to occur

e system is t

with rubber glo

inhaling the a

m is not to be

eing irrigated

low lying area

shall annually

orn crop on the

should not ta

g.

n should be m

xists in the lag

re typically pl

n with effluen

ntamination.

tion equipmen

n. The equipme

rinkler system

y 330 m long,

harging 35 L/m

al spray drift

mm, PTO driven

te is approxim

gation system

gation to lands

ed onto a publ

ontrolled by th

ding of effluen

during periods

to be moveab

ves and is to i

erosol.

e operated mo

is to have rela

as is to be prev

y maintain and

e effluent irriga

ake place for

anaged to ens

goon cells to pr

aced on the ty

nt and crop ha

nt that he has u

ent consists o

m

150 mm main

min, spaced 12

n, capable of p

ately 0.014 cm

is the respon

s owned by the

ic road, into a

e lagoon owne

t is to occur o

s of heavy rain

ble and the o

instruct him to

re than 10 ho

atively flat top

ented.

d harvest forag

ated land.

a minimum

sure that prior

rovide winter s

ype of crop an

arvesting, to r

utilized for the

f:

line, wheel mo

m apart

pumping 1,000

m/sec.

sibility of the

e lagoon owne

residential ar

er.

on the applicat

or overland flo

owner is to p

o maintain saf

urs continuou

ography, and

ge, cereal grain

of seven day

r to October 1,

storage volume

2 - 6

d the time

reduce the

continued

ounted and

0 L/min at

owner and

r. Effluent

rea or onto

tion lands.

ooding.

rovide the

fe distance

usly at one

ponding of

n, oil seed,

ys prior to

, sufficient

e.

2.5.4 La

Th

wa

the

ac

lan

2.5.5 Po

Po

po

the

Th

mo

at

pro

nu

co

2.5.6 Wa

Th

co

pri

wa

pro

2.5

9

1

agoon Access

e existing lago

as constructed

e lagoon site;

cess to the la

nd.

opulation Con

opulation data

opulation utiliz

e mobile home

e current pop

obile home par

the same est

ojected design

umber of mobil

mmercial or re

astewater Pro

e Bowes Mob

llection of res

imary cell via

astewater doe

ojected year 2

5.6.1 Organ

The o

waste

the o

piped

the p

Table

the la

9. For public

irrigation d

rains, or hi

10. Special pre

potential a

mobile hom

s

oon does not h

d for the lagoo

therefore no

agoon for gene

ntributing Effl

for the mob

ing the Bowes

e park has 110

ulation would

rk intends to e

timated per ca

n year 20 wou

e homes and s

esidential popu

oduction

bile Home Par

idential waste

a two separat

es not occur.

0 populations

nic Loading

organic loadin

ewater. A typ

organic loading

d collection sys

iped collection

1 in Appendix

agoon.

c safety and

does not occur

gh winds).

ecautions mus

aerosols onto p

me park.

have a truck du

on. The lagoon

access road

eral maintena

luent

bile home park

lagoon includ

0 lots, with an e

then be estim

expand by app

apita populati

uld be 525 peo

service popula

ulation is estim

rk currently u

ewater, with fo

te forcemains

The expande

as stated abo

g calculation

ical value of 0

g from the re

stem. Based o

n system, an o

x B, shows the

proper operat

r during inappr

st be taken to

public property

ump spillway,

owner does n

will be const

nce purposes

k was obtaine

es residents w

estimated per

mated at 275

roximately 10

on of 2.5 peo

ople, on a tota

tion will grow a

mated for the la

utilizes a grav

our lift stations

s. Truck haul

d wastewater

ve, for the exp

is based upo

0.076 kg BOD5

sidents within

on the projecte

organic load o

e current and

tions the ope

ropriate weath

o ensure that

y or into reside

and therefore

not intend to h

ructed to the

through the

ed from the s

within the mob

capita populat

people. The o

0 lots in the n

ple/home, the

al of 210 lots.

at an annual ra

agoon site.

vity sewer co

s that send th

dumping of

r treatment la

panded mobile

on the organic

5/person/day w

n the mobile h

ed year 20 pop

of 40.0 kg BOD

projected yea

rator is to en

her conditions

winds will not

ential areas, s

no existing ac

haul effluent v

lagoon. The o

surrounding a

site owner. Th

ile home park.

tion of 2.5 peo

owner indicate

ext 20 years.

e total populat

It is assume

ate of 3.3%. No

llection syste

he influent to t

septic or hol

agoon is to s

home park.

cs in typical r

was utilized to

home park, th

pulation of 525

D5/day will be g

r 20 organic lo

2 - 7

nsure that

(i.e. heavy

t blow any

uch as the

ccess road

via truck to

owner has

agricultural

he service

. Currently

ople/home.

ed that the

Therefore,

tion in the

ed that the

additional

em for the

the lagoon

lding tank

ervice the

residential

o estimate

hrough the

5 people on

generated.

oadings to

2.5

2.5.7 Ex

Th

a r

the

on

Th

ch

Manit

of a l

size o

5.6.2 Hydra

The h

waste

facult

sprin

only t

lagoo

The h

seaso

consi

perio

peak

the o

collec

Based

the l

proje

98 m

over t

Appen

lagoo

xisting Lagoo

e organic and

review of the J

e site topogra

n the Manitoba

e information

aracteristics:

the inne

the ope

the lago

A minim

toba Provincia

agoon is limite

of the primary

aulic Loading

hydraulic loadin

e streams: w

tative lagoon t

g months. The

the flow betw

on storage peri

historical wate

on) indicated

idered peak flo

d (i.e. winter)

flow was utiliz

wner, therefo

ction system.

d on this per c

agoon would

cted hydrauli3/day. The tot

the required 2

ndix B, shows

on.

n Assessmen

hydraulic stor

JRCC 1986 lag

phic investiga

a Conservation

n utilized for

er slopes of the

rating depth o

oon cells have

mum liquid dep

l guidelines st

ed to 56 kg BO

cell(s) at the m

ng to the Bowe

water usage a

to have sufficie

erefore, in acco

een October 1

od.

er usage recor

an average w

ows for the mo

would likely b

zed. Pumping

re an allowanc

This increases

apita wastewa

be approxim

c loading to

tal hydraulic c

230 day stora

s the current

nt and Capac

age capacities

oon proposal r

ation. The requ

n Design Obje

estimating e

e primary and

f the lagoon ce

a freeboard of

th of 0.3 m to b

tate the peak o

OD5/ha/day. Th

minimum volum

es wastewater

nd infiltration

ent storage fo

ordance with la

1 and May 15

ds between J

water use of

bile home park

be lower, howe

g records from

ce of 15% was

s the hydraulic

ater production

ately 51 m3/d

the lagoon i

capacity of the

ge period to m

and projecte

ity

s of the existin

report. The lag

uirements for

ctives for Stan

existing capa

secondary cel

ells is 1.5 m

f 0.75 m

be retained in

organic loading

he 56 kg BOD5

me of 0.75 m f

r treatment lag

n. Manitoba C

r a 230 day pe

agoon hydraul

is of importan

uly 2013 and

405 L/home/

k, typical flows

ever for the sa

the lift station

s made for inf

c loading to 46

n rate, the cur

day, during th

in year 20 w

e lagoon would

meet the year

d year 20 hy

g Bowes lagoo

goon sizing wa

lagoon loading

ndard Sewage

city assumed

ll dikes were co

the secondary

g rate to the p

5/ha/day is bas

from the cell flo

goon is compri

Conservation r

eriod over the w

ic storage requ

nce, as it repre

September 2

/day. As this

s throughout t

ake of lagoon s

ns were not re

filtration into t

6 L/home/day

rent hydraulic

he storage p

would be app

d need to be 2

20 demand.

ydraulic loadin

on were determ

as also confirm

g and sizing w

e Lagoons (Ju

d the followin

onstructed at

y cell after disc

2 - 8

rimary cell

sed on the

oor.

ised of two

requires a

winter and

uirements,

esents the

013 (peak

would be

he storage

sizing, this

ecorded by

the gravity

y.

loading to

eriod. The

roximately

22,525 m3

Table 1 in

ngs to the

mined from

med during

were based

uly, 1985).

ng design

3H:1V

charge.

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5.8 La

As

org

to

5.7.1 Lagoo

The e

inves

good

catta

occur

inves

5.7.2 Existi

Provi

excee

depth

existi

0.75

estim

surfa

loadin

cell is

expan

5.7.3 Existi

Provi

deter

(stora

level

disch

be 0.

would

prima

cell h

stora

the m

the 2

hydra

requi

agoon Expans

discussed ab

ganic and hyd

meet the futu

on Assessmen

existing lagoo

stigation by JR

condition, ho

ils and weeds

rred. No disc

stigation. The l

ing Organic Ca

ncial guideline

ed 56 kg BOD5/

h in the prima

ing lagoon prim

m, resulting i

mated organic l

ce area of 7,1

ng rate of 40.0

s not sufficien

nsion.

ing Hydraulic S

ncial guideline

rmined from th

age) cells volu

(1.5 m dept

harge pipe, the

3 m from the

d create a pre

ary cell has a s

has a storage c

ge capacity of

mobile home pa

230 day storag

aulic storage

re expansion.

sion Requirem

bove, the exist

raulic design lo

re organic and

nt

on cells were

RCC. From the

owever the ins

s, therefore it w

cernible leaka

agoon site cur

apacity

es stipulate th

/ha/day in the

ary cell is us

mary cell curr

in a total orga

oading rate di

131 m2 at a de

0 kg BOD5/day.

nt for the proje

Storage Capac

es stipulate t

he volume of

ume, between

th). While the

minimum liqu

cell floor, to p

eferential flow

storage capac

capacity of ap

f 8,548 m3. Bas

ark, the lagoon

ge period. The

for the projec

ments

ting lagoon wi

oadings. Expa

d hydraulic load

visually asse

e investigation

side slopes o

was difficult to

ge or strong

rrently has no

hat the organ

e primary cell.

ed to determ

rently has a su

anic capacity

scussed above

epth of 0.75 m

The existing

ected populati

city

hat the hydra

the top half o

the discharge

e Bowes lagoo

uid level to be m

prevent cracks

w path through

city of approxim

proximately 5,

sed on the est

n requires a to

erefore the exi

cted hydraulic

ll not have su

ansion of the p

ding requireme

essed during

n, the lagoon

f the cells ha

o determine w

g odours wer

perimeter fenc

ic loading rat

The effluent s

ine the treatm

urface area of

of 19.8 kg B

e, the primary

m, in design ye

lagoon organic

ion in design

aulic storage

of the primary

e pipe invert a

on secondary

maintained in t

s forming in t

h the floor lin

mately 2,861

,687 m3, resul

imated year 2

otal storage vo

isting lagoon d

c loading in d

ufficient capac

rimary and se

ents.

the 2013 ge

cells appeare

ad significant

whether any er

e detected d

ce or perimete

e of a lagoon

surface area a

ment surface

f 3,540 m2 at

OD5/day. Bas

cell requires a

ear 20 for a tot

c capacity in th

year 20 and w

capacity of a

cell and the

and the maxim

y cell does n

the secondary

he cell floor li

er. The existi

m3, while the

lting in an ove

0 hydraulic loa

olume of 22,52

does not have

design year 2

city to meet th

condary cells

2 - 9

otechnical

ed to be in

growth of

rosion had

during the

er ditch.

must not

t a 0.75 m

area. The

a depth of

sed on the

a minimum

tal organic

he primary

will require

lagoon is

secondary

mum liquid

ot have a

cell would

ner, which

ing lagoon

secondary

rall lagoon

ading from

25 m3 over

e sufficient

0 and will

he 20 year

is required

Va

ne

ne

by

sto

Th

be

pri

7,8

mo

wi

ma

A n

Po

req

ca

ex

pip

co

1.0

ele

dis

2.5.9 To

An

inv

the

2.5

2.5

rious options

ecessary, whic

ew cells. Howe

y converting th

orage cell (see

e lagoon prim

etween the ex

imary cell will

884 m2. This s

ore than the p

ll have additi

aintained in th

new storage c

olar-King Home

quired. The ne

pacity of 22,5

panded prima

pe, as effluen

nstructed with

0 m to the top

evation of the e

scussed in Sec

opography an

on-site geote

vestigation wa

e proposed exp

5.9.1 Topog

A top

dikes

gener

The la

appro

north

5.9.2 Past

Existi

Wate

inform

Mobil

were conside

ch included va

ever, the most

he existing se

e Plan L3 in App

ary cell will be

xisting primary

have a surfac

surface area w

projected year

ional bufferin

e primary cell,

cell would be c

es Inc. current

ew storage ce

525 m3, in de

ry cell via an i

nt irrigation is

h inner slopes

of dike. The to

expanded prim

ction 2.5.12 be

d Geotechnic

echnical inves

as completed o

pansion of the

graphy

ographical su

s was complete

ral area surrou

and generally

oximately 0.18

h end over a dis

Geotechnical

ing driller well

r Stewardshi

mation. The n

e Home Park.

ered for achie

rious combina

feasible and c

econdary cell

pendix D).

e expanded th

y cell and sec

ce area at a he

ill be capable o

20 organic lo

g capacity. T

, along with an

constructed ad

ly owns this p

ll would be siz

sign year 20.

intercell pipe.

s the intende

s of 4H:1V, an

op of dike elev

mary cell. Cons

elow.

cal Investigat

stigation was

on November

e existing lagoo

rvey of the pr

ed using GPS s

unding the lag

slopes toward

8 m was obser

stance of 286

Data

logs for the a

p 2011 dat

earest well lo

The well logs i

eving the incre

ations of conv

cost effective

into another

hrough the rem

condary cell.

eight of 0.75 m

of treating app

oading rate to

The existing f

operating dep

djacent to the

parcel of land, a

zed to provide

The new sto

The new stora

ed disposal m

operating dep

vation in the st

struction of the

tion

completed on

15, 2013, to d

on.

roposed lagoo

survey equipm

goon was relat

ds the north a

ved from the s

m (a surface s

area of the lag

abase, for b

gs available w

indicated that

eased organic

verting existing

option was to

primary cell, a

moval of a port

Based on this

m from the ce

proximately 44

the lagoon, th

freeboard hei

pth of 1.5 m.

existing cells

additional land

e the total req

rage cell wou

age cell would

method. The

pth of 1.5 m an

torage cell wou

e lagoon liner i

August 9, 20

determine the

n expansion a

ment. Based o

tively flat to g

nd an average

south end of th

slope of approx

oon were revie

background s

were from Riv

the soils in th

c and hydraul

g cells and co

expand the p

and construct

tion of the int

s design, the

ell floor of app

4.1 kg BOD5/da

herefore the pr

ght of 0.75

s to the west.

d purchase wo

quired hydraul

ld be connect

not include a

storage cell

nd a freeboard

uld match the

in the new sto

013 and a top

suitability of t

area and exist

on site observa

ently sloping

e elevation dif

he expansion a

ximately 0.06%

ewed from the

soils and gro

er Lot 32 in t

e general area

2 - 10

ic storage

nstructing

rimary cell

ting a new

ercell dike

expanded

roximately

y, which is

rimary cell

m will be

As Bowes

ould not be

lic storage

ted to the

discharge

would be

d height of

top of dike

rage cell is

ographical

the site for

ing lagoon

ations, the

grassland.

fference of

area to the

%).

e Manitoba

oundwater

the Bowes

consisted

2.5

of su

follow

below

Based

lagoo

devel

lacus

textu

layer

perm

agricu

only

Manacapab

not h

lagoo

At the

2.9 m

revea

soils

liner

time

tube

perm

5.9.3 Site In

The o

condu

the te

A tot

inves

surro

open

teste

an un

poten

The s

noted

profil

analy

urficial silty cl

wed by sand o

w the surface.

d on the existi

on expansion c

loped on thin

strine sedimen

red deposits.

s of fine sand

eability is mo

ultural suitabil

moderate limit

agement Regubility classes 1

have restrictio

on.

e time of the o

m at the site

aled that the s

indicated that

requirements

of the original

samples of th

eability result

nvestigation

onsite geotec

ucted on Augu

est hole drilling

al of seven t

stigation to a m

unding the ex

grass lands a

d to determin

ndisturbed sta

ntial borrow ma

subsurface soi

d and represen

e. The sample

ysis. Shelby tu

ay down to a

verlying clay.

The driller wel

ng detailed so

consist of Dug

, fine-textured

nts overlying m

These soil te

d or sandy loa

oderately slow

lity classificati

tations due to

ulations under

1, 2 or 3 are c

ns for the app

original lagoon

of the existin

oils consisted

t the hydraulic

of 1 x 10-7 cm

investigation

he finished lag

s of 2.1 x 10-9 c

chnical invest

ust 9, 2013 by

g under direct

test holes (T

maximum dept

xisting lagoon

and agricultura

e whether the

te (in-situ) or

aterial. Test ho

l profile within

ntative soil sa

es were visual

ubes of undistu

approximately

Groundwater

l log reports ha

ils survey repo

gas Series soi

d, moderately

moderately to s

extures range

am. The topog

w. Based on

ion for the lago

o excessive so

r the Water Ponsidered as n

plication of nu

design, two te

ng lagoon. The

of low to med

c conductivity

m/sec or less af

was 1.4 m to

goon dikes rev

cm/sec and 9.

tigation for th

y JRCC. A trac

supervision by

H1 to TH7) w

th of 6.0 m. T

cells to the w

al land being u

e soils were su

after reworkin

ole locations a

n each test ho

amples were c

ly field-classif

urbed in-situ s

1.5 m to 2.4

was recorded

ave been attac

ort (No. 17), th

ls, which are

y to strongly

strongly calca

from silt loam

graphy is leve

agricultural c

oon area is Cla

il moisture. A

Protection Act,

nutrient mana

utrients from a

est holes were

e results of th

dium plastic, si

of the clay ma

fter re-working

1.5 m below t

vealed that th

8 x 10-10 cm/se

he proposed

ked drill rig wa

y JRCC’s field r

were drilled d

he test holes

west and north

used for growi

uitable for use

ng, and whethe

are shown on P

ole was logged

collected as th

fied and confir

oil were collec

4 m below th

at approxima

ched in Append

he soils in the a

Gleyed Rego B

calcareous al

reous course t

m to silty clay

el to gently sl

capability map

ss 1/Class 2, w

According to th

lands with a

gement zone

a wastewater

e excavated to

he original inv

ilty clay. Anal

aterial would l

g. The water le

the surface. T

e soil materia

ec (reworked c

lagoon expan

as employed t

representative

during the ge

were located i

h. The lands te

ng canola. Th

as a clay lago

er soils could b

Plan 1 in Appen

d, water condit

he soils varied

rmed through

cted in various

2 - 11

e surface,

tely 3.3 m

dix C.

area of the

Black soils

lluvial and

to medium

loam with

loping and

pping, the

which have

he Nutrient

agricultural

N1 and do

treatment

a depth of

vestigation

ysis of the

ikely meet

evel at the

Two Shelby

l achieved

clay liner).

nsion was

to conduct

.

otechnical

in the land

ested were

e site was

oon liner in

be used for

ndix D.

tions were

along the

laboratory

test holes

2.5

and a

variou

samp

the s

stand

mixed

Propo

From

expan

dista

park.

existi

the w

water

Based

thin l

appro

plast

altern

encou

Stand

surfa

great

also h

areas

based

rainy

made

Detai

well a

Appen

Contr

onsit

of exc

5.9.4 Labor

Repre

subm

at depths app

us test holes

ple was deeme

short term gro

ding water in t

d with the auge

osed Expansio

discussions w

nsion would be

nce from the e

Therefore, tes

ing lagoon cell

west of the exis

r lines.

d on the soils

ayer of topso

oximately 0.4 m

ic, silty clay do

nating layers

untered at any

ding water wa

ce, to 1.0 m

er depths wit

had standing

s with standing

d on static gro

seasons. Oth

e at this time, a

ls of each test

as comments o

ndix C.

ractors should

e, as dewateri

cavation deter

ratory Analysi

esentative bag

mitted to The N

propriate for a

and at various

ed necessary.

oundwater con

the test holes

er cuttings.

on Area

with the land

e to the northw

existing reside

st holes were

ls. Due to the

sting lagoon c

observed in t

il followed by

m – 1.1 m belo

own to approxi

of silt and m

y of the test ho

as recorded in

below the su

h greater dist

water at TH4,

g water at the

oundwater lev

her assumptio

as water levels

t hole soil prof

on static wate

d be made aw

ing may be req

rmined during f

is

gged soil samp

National Testin

lagoon liner.

s depths, for u

Following com

nditions was c

. All test hole

owner, the pre

west of the ex

ences and pro

conducted to

presence of tw

ells, test holes

he test holes,

a layer of bla

ow the surface

imately 1.3 m

medium plasti

oles.

n all of the te

rface. In gene

ance from the

, while the oth

e surface. Stan

vels and on se

ons relating to

s will normally

file, including d

r level can be

ware of the g

quired during

final design.

ples from the

ng Laboratorie

Bulk samples

utilization if te

mpletion of dr

completed by

es were then b

eferred locatio

isting lagoon c

posed residen

the west, nor

wo existing wa

s were conduc

the general s

ack, high plast

e. Below was a

– 3.0 m below

ic clay. Refus

st holes at d

eral, standing

e existing lago

her test holes

nding water in

easonal condit

the groundwa

fluctuate seas

depth and desc

found in the te

geotechnical c

construction,

proposed lago

es Ltd. (NTL) f

s were also co

esting of a rew

rilling, an asse

measuring th

backfilled with

on for a potent

cells, due to th

nces in the mo

rthwest and no

ater mainlines

cted to the eas

oil profile cons

tic organic cla

a consistent la

w the surface, fo

sal or bedrock

epths ranging

water was ob

oon. The groun

s were not con

n the test hole

tions, i.e. snow

ater elevation

sonally.

cription of eac

est hole logs a

conditions en

depending on

oon expansion

for testing and

2 - 12

ollected in

worked soil

essment of

he level of

bentonite

tial lagoon

he setback

obile home

orth of the

running to

st of these

sisted of a

ay down to

yer of high

ollowed by

k was not

g from the

bserved at

nd surface

nducted in

s can vary

wmelt and

cannot be

ch layer, as

attached in

ncountered

the depth

area were

d analysis.

The fo

testin

Four b

In ad

was t

The fo

The S

The la

CH - h

soils

would

less.

perce

repre

when

Only t

for us

samp

had a

class

hydra

are ex

ollowing is a s

ng results are i

bagged sampl

Atterberg L

Soil Classif

Moisture C

Particle Siz

Visual Clas

dition, an in-si

ested for:

Hydraulic C

our bagged soi

TH1 0.1 m

TH1 1.5 m

TH6 1.5 m

TH6 3.0 m

helby tube sam

TH6 1.5 m

aboratory ana

high plastic si

with a Plastic

d typically be e

The Plasticity

entage of clay

sented by the

n reworked and

three of the so

se as a clay

ple (TH6 1.5 m

a Plasticity Ind

ified as unsui

aulic conductiv

xpected to be s

summary of th

included in App

es were analyz

Limits (plastic

fication (ASTM

Content ( ASTM

ze Analysis (Hy

ssification.

itu Shelby tub

Conductivity (A

il samples ana

– 1.1 m

– 3.9 m

– 2.1 m

– 3.2 m.

mple analyzed

– 2.1 m.

lysis of the ba

ilty clay. The

city Index grea

expected to ac

y Index in the

ranged from

e bagged samp

d re-compacted

oils represente

liner in their

m - 2.1 m) was

dex greater th

itable as a lin

vity test perfor

suitable for lin

he testing resu

pendix C.

zed for the foll

limit, liquid lim

D2487)

D2216)

ydrometer tes

e sample from

ASTM D5084).

lyzed were fro

d was from the

agged samples

laboratory ind

ater than 25

chieve a hydra

e bagged sam

60% to 74%. B

ples were cons

d, according to

ed by the bagg

in-situ (native

not considere

han 25 and a c

ner in an in-sit

rmed on soil in

er constructio

ults, while det

owing:

mit, and plastic

t, ASTM D422)

m the proposed

om the followin

following test

s indicated tha

dicated that in

and a clay co

aulic conductiv

mples ranged

Based on thes

sidered suitab

o the NTL soils

ged samples w

e) state, while

ed suitable. W

clay content g

tu state, base

n the same lay

on when rework

ails of NTL an

city index, ASTM

d lagoon expa

ng test holes:

holes:

at the soils co

n general, hom

ontent greater

vity of 1 x 10-7

from 38 to 5

se results all o

ble for use as a

analysis repor

were considere

e the remainin

While this bagg

greater than 5

ed on the resu

er. However, t

ked.

2 - 13

alysis and

M D4318)

nsion area

onsisted of

mogeneous

r than 50%

cm/sec or

2 and the

of the soils

a clay liner

rt.

ed suitable

ng bagged

ged sample

50%, it was

ults of the

these soils

2.5.10 La

Ma

mi

mo

the

2.5.11 Ty

Th

co

sit

co

If t

ca

co

req

2.5.12 Pr

Ba

tub

su

ex

The la

liner

shoul

class

misle

The S

repre

samp

repre

achie

Manit

(see S

an in-

analy

which

when

analy

poten

the Sh

agoon Liner D

anitoba Conse

inimum of 1.0

ovement throu

e underlying g

ypical Lagoon

e liner of a lag

nsistently ach

tu soils cann

nstructed by e

the clay conte

nnot consiste

nstructed of h

quired.

oposed Lago

ased on the fie

be sample, so

itable for use

pected that so

ab also noted

are based upo

ld be noted t

ification test r

eading if the so

Shelby tube s

sentative to d

ple appeared h

sentative por

eved a hydrau

toba Conserva

Section 2.5.10

-situ clay lagoo

ysis conducted

h would typica

n reworked an

ysis is a more

ntial soil liner t

helby tube ana

Design Guidel

ervation guide

m in thicknes

ugh the soil) of

groundwater fro

n Liner Constr

goon can be co

hieve a hydrau

not achieve t

excavating and

ent of the soils

ently achieve

high plastic cla

on Expansion

eld observation

ome of the silt

as a liner in a

ome of the so

that commen

on the soil bei

hat estimatin

results (Plastic

oil contains lay

sample was e

determine cha

omogeneous t

tion was sele

lic conductivit

ation requirem

0 below). There

on liner. As me

d on the bagge

ally be deemed

nd re-compact

e accurate det

than the analy

alysis should u

ines

lines require t

s and have a h

f 1 x 10-7 cm/s

om lagoon effl

ruction Optio

onstructed usi

lic conductivit

he required

d re-compactin

s is so low that

a hydraulic

ay from a borr

n Liner Desig

ns and laborat

ty clay soils o

an in-situ state

ils will not be

nts regarding t

ng homogene

g the hydraul

city Index and

yers of sand, si

xtracted at N

aracteristics o

throughout the

ected for anal

ty of 6.1 x 10

ent of 1 x 10-7

efore, these so

entioned abov

ed soil sample

d suitable for u

ted. It is und

termination of

sis of disturbe

ultimately dete

that a standa

hydraulic cond

sec or less. Thi

uent seepage.

ns

ng in-situ (und

ty of 1 x 10-7 cm

hydraulic con

ng suitable cla

t even when e

conductivity

row pit, or a sy

gn

tory analysis o

observed in th

e, however ove

suitable for u

the potential u

ous with no p

lic conductivit

particle size a

ilt, or organic m

NTL under the

of the sample

e length of the

ysis. The in-s-6 cm/sec, wh

7 cm/sec or les

oils were deem

ve, this result c

e obtained from

use as a clay li

erstood that

f the suitabilit

ed bag sample

ermine soil line

rd wastewate

ductivity (i.e. t

s low rate of p

.

disturbed nati

m/sec or less i

nductivity, th

y soils to form

excavated and

of 1 x 10-7 c

ynthetic geom

of the bagged

he proposed ex

er the entire e

se as an in-si

use of the ma

referential flow

ty of a soil ba

analysis) alon

material.

e supervision

prior to anal

Shelby tube, t

itu Shelby tub

ich was highe

ss for a clay la

med unsuitable

contradicts the

m the same la

iner in an in-si

the in-situ Sh

ty of soils for

, therefore the

er suitability.

r lagoon clay

he potential ra

permeability is

ve) soils, if the

n their in-situ

e lagoon line

the liner.

re-compacted

cm/sec or les

membrane line

soil samples a

xpansion area

expansion area

tu lagoon cell

2 - 14

aterial as a

w paths. It

ased upon

e might be

of a JRCC

yzing. The

therefore a

be sample

er than the

agoon liner

e for use as

e results of

yer of soil,

tu state or

helby tube

r use as a

e results of

liner be a

ate of fluid

to protect

e soils can

state. If in

er can be

d, the soils

ss, a liner

r would be

and Shelby

a would be

a, it is also

liner. The

res

hy

str

tha

lik

rew

lin

co

thi

co

Th

es

un

po

un

co

lag

lin

eq

Th

lin

ex

no

sa

to

2.5.13 Re

Th

gu

are

2.5

2.5

sults of the pe

ydraulic condu

ructure is alte

an the in-situ s

ely that these

worked and re

er and vertica

mpacted soils

ickness of 1.0

nducted by Ma

e suitable so

timated from

nsuitable soils

ossible that un

nsuitable soil m

mpacted clay

goon liner (cut

er is proposed

uipment requi

ere is always

er, even afte

pansion area,

ot meet Manito

nd or stone) d

prevent the po

eview of Regu

e Province of M

ideline in the

e described in

5.13.1 Organ

Altho

avera

cell h

5.13.2 Hydra

The la

stora

lagoo

ermeability tes

uctivity of 1 x

ered in such a

soils. As the s

e soils would c

e-compacted. T

l cut-off wall o

s from the ex

0 m, which wil

anitoba Conse

il layer for co

0.2 m (top of

(silt) were a

suitable soil m

material is en

material. The

t-off wall) is to

d to have a mi

irements.

a risk associa

r reworking a

based on the

oba Conservati

discovered dur

ossibility of pr

ulatory Requi

Manitoba Desig layout and de

Section 2.5.2

nic Loading

ugh a lagoon

age organic tre

as been utilize

aulic Loading

agoon cannot

ge period) pe

on must have

sting indicated

x 10-7 cm/sec.

way as to cre

oils in the exp

consistently ac

Therefore, it is

of the lagoon e

xpansion area

l reduce the r

rvation after c

onstruction of

layer), to 3.0

lso encounter

material may be

countered, it w

e reworked soi

o be construc

nimum thickn

ted with utiliz

and re-compac

results of the

on requiremen

ring construct

eferential flow

rements

gn Objectives fesign of the lag

above.

operates at v

eatment rate o

ed.

be discharge

er current Ma

the storage c

d that the in-si

When soils a

eate a liner wi

ansion area co

chieve a hydra

recommende

expansion cell

. These soils

isk of the soil

onstruction.

f the horizont

m - 4.9 m (bo

red below 3.0

e encountered

will require re

ils forming the

ted to a minim

ness of 3.0 m,

ing excavated

cting. While t

e soils analysis

nts after const

ion would nee

w through the li

for Standard Sgoon expansio

various organic

of 56 kg BOD5/h

d between Oc

anitoba Conse

capacity for t

tu soils canno

are reworked

th much lowe

onsisted of hig

aulic conductiv

d that the soil

be constructe

s should be r

liner not pas

tal and vertica

ottom of layer

m during the

d during the lag

moval and rep

e horizontal (la

mum thicknes

to accommod

d soils for the c

his risk is m

s, it is possibl

truction. Any u

d to be remov

ner.

Sewage Lagoonon. The provin

c efficiencies

ha/day at 0.75

ctober 1 and M

rvation requir

his time perio

ot consistently

and re-compa

er hydraulic co

gh plastic silty

vity of 1 x 10-7

s forming the

ed with rework

eworked to a

sing a permea

al lagoon cell

r) below the su

e field testing

goon expansio

placement wit

agoon floor) a

s of 1.0 m. T

date typical co

construction o

inimal at the

e that the soil

unsuitable ma

ved from the la

ns (1985) was

ncial siting req

throughout th

5 m depth in th

May 15 (230 d

rements. Ther

od based upo

2 - 15

y achieve a

acted, the

onductivity

clays, it is 7 cm/sec if

horizontal

ked and re-

minimum

ability test

liner was

urface. As

, it is also

n works. If

th suitable

nd vertical

he vertical

nstruction

of a lagoon

proposed

l liner may

aterial (silt,

agoon liner

s used as a

quirements

he year an

he primary

day winter

refore, the

n half the

2.5

2.5

2.5.14 Nu

As

Ste

on

to

int

for

of

co

so

so

en

wa

2.5.15 Ex

In

slo

volum

disch

5.13.3 Lagoo

Sewa

the p

havin

a hyd

could

5.13.4 Efflue

From

Qualit

requi

disch

Addit

Act Li

utrient Manag

recommende

ewardship, De

ne option for nu

retain nutrien

to surrounding

rage or oilseed

effluent irrigat

ncern with ef

dium, which c

fteners are t

ncouraged to in

ater softeners.

xpanded Lago

the construct

opes of 4H:1V

me of the prim

harge pipe (or a

on Liner

ge lagoons are

roposed lagoo

ng a hydraulic c

draulic conduc

d be lined with

ent Quality Re

discussions w

ty Standards

rements woul

harge (irrigatio

fecal colifo

total colifo

BOD of 25

TSS of 25 m

ional effluent

icence, to be d

gement Plan

ed in the Lake

cember 2006,

utrient reducti

nts on land wh

g waterways.

d crops, or on g

tion can reduc

ffluent irrigatio

can lead to sa

typically the

nform mobile h

.

oon Design Re

tion of the ne

V, would utilize

mary cell and

a designated d

e to be design

on is underlain

conductivity o

ctivity of 1 x 1

a synthetic lin

quirements

with Manitoba

s, Objectives

ld pertain to

n):

orms of 200/10

orms of 1500/1

mg/L or less

mg/L or less.

quality param

etermined by

e Winnipeg Ste

, land applicat

on in waterbod

here they can

The effluent

grasslands uti

ce the requirem

on typically p

alinization of t

main source

home owners

equirements

ew lagoon sto

e a minimum

the secondar

depth from the

ed and constr

by soil with a

f 1 x 10-7 cm/s

0-7 cm/sec or

ner.

a Conservation

and Guidelin

the Bowes wa

00 ml or less

100 ml or less

meters may be

Manitoba Cons

ewardship Boa

ion of effluent

dies of the Lak

be utilized for

can be applie

lized for grazin

ments for inorg

ertains to was

the soils and

of sodium i

of the recomm

rage cell, the

liquid depth o

ry cell volume

floor) to the m

ucted such th

thickness of a

sec or less. In t

less, the inter

n and a review

nes, the foll

astewater tre

e required as p

servation.

ard – Report tt through irriga

ke Winnipeg Wa

plant growth

ed to several

ng (under cert

ganic fertilizer

stewater that

reduction in

n drinking w

mendation to n

cell would be

of 0.3 m abov

e from the inv

maximum liquid

at the interior

at least one me

the absence of

rior surfaces o

w of the Manit

owing effluen

atment lagoo

part of the En

to the Ministeation is consid

atershed. It is

as opposed to

actively growi

ain conditions

s on crops. Th

contains high

crop productio

ater. The pro

not utilize sod

e clay-lined wi

ve the cell bo

2 - 16

vert of the

d level.

surface of

etre and of

f soils with

of a lagoon

oba Water nt quality

n, prior to

nvironment

r of Water dered to be

preferable

o releasing

ing cereal,

s). The use

he greatest

h levels of

on. Water

oponent is

ium based

ith interior

ttom after

dis

wa

2.5

2.5

2.5

scharge, and h

as utilized in la

5.15.1 Prima

As de

prima

cell a

prima

on th

0.75

capab

addit

5.15.2 Stora

The

requi

appro

16,42

prima

22,66

be su

5.15.3 Summ

A list

below

have a 1.0 m fr

agoon expansio

ary Cell

escribed above

ary cell by rem

and the second

ary and secon

his design the

m from the c

ble of treating

ional buffering

age Cell

new storage

rements. The

oximately 11,

26 m3. With th

ary cell (6,239

65 m3. The tot

ufficient to des

mary of Selecte

of design pa

w:

a 20 year d

a total po

collection s

a winter st

a total proj

a total proj

a minimum

use of the

removal of

and the se

expanded

height of 0

an operatin

0.75 m to t

eeboard (see P

on sizing, as pe

e, the existing

moving a portio

dary cell, as s

dary cells will

expanded pri

ell floor, of ap

g the projected

g capacity.

cell would

storage cell

993 m2, and

he storage ca

9 m3), the total

tal storage vo

ign year 20.

ed Design Crit

arameters pert

design period

pulation of 5

system in the

orage period o

jected organic

jected hydraul

m hydraulic sto

existing forcem

f a portion of t

condary cell to

primary cell to

0.75 m from the

ng depth in th

the top of dike

Plan L4 in App

er current Man

secondary ce

on of the interc

shown on the

remain intact

mary cell wou

pproximately 7

d year 20 org

be construct

would be de

d a hydraulic

pacity availab

hydraulic sto

lume over the

eria

tinent to the

25 people fro

Bowes Mobile

of 230 days

loading rate o

ic loading rate

orage capacity

mains into the

the intercell d

o form an expa

o have a surfac

e cell floor

e expanded pr

endix D). A sto

nitoba Conserv

ell would be co

cell dike betwe

plans. The exi

through the e

uld have a sur

7,884 m2. This

anic loadings

ed to meet

esigned with

storage cap

ble in the top

rage available

e 230 day wint

Bowes lagoon

om 210 mobi

Home Park

f 40.0 kg BOD5

e of 98 m3/day

of 22,525 m3

primary cell

dike between t

anded primary

ce area of appr

rimary cell of 1

orage period of

vation requirem

onverted to an

een the existin

sting liner of t

expansion wor

rface area at a

s surface area

to the lagoon

the hydrauli

a flat bottom

acity of appr

0.75 m of the

would be app

ter storage pe

n expansion is

le homes on

5/day

the existing pr

cell

roximately 7,8

1.5 m and a fre

2 - 17

f 230 days

ments.

n extended

ng primary

the lagoon

rks. Based

a height of

a would be

n and have

c storage

m area of

roximately

e proposed

roximately

riod would

s provided

the piped

rimary cell

884 m2 at a

eeboard of

2.5.16 La

Th

co

an

re-

su

4H

sto

co

mo

co

be

co

Th

the

ele

ex

he

the

be

at

ce

be

A p

be

agoon Constru

e new storage

mpacted soil.

nd re-compacte

-compacted e

rrounding bor

H:1V. All organ

orage cell co

mpacted to a

oisture conten

mpaction equ

e dried or wast

mpacted with

e new storage

e top of dike.

evation. The f

panded prima

eight of 2.25 m

e west dike of

e placed in the

the ends of th

ll would have a

e seeded with g

portion of the i

e removed to ex

constructio

lagoon cell

an operatin

to the top o

a total usa

utilize rew

vertical lin

construct n

construct h

construct t

install an

storage ce

utilize the

uction Detail

e cell would b

A 3.0 m wide

ed horizontal li

excavated soi

row site. The

nic topsoil wou

nstruction ar

a minimum St

nt during con

ipment cannot

ed and materi

a minimum of

e cell would be

. The top of d

loor elevation

ry cell, as the

m from the floo

f the expanded

intercell dike f

e intercell pipe

a width of 3.0 m

grass upon com

ntercell dike b

xpand the prim

on of a new st

ls

ng depth in th

of dike

ble hydraulic s

worked and re-

er in the new s

new storage ce

horizontal cell

the vertical cu

intercell pipe

ll

surrounding fo

s

be excavated

e vertical cut-o

iner. The interi

ls at the pro

inner and out

uld be remove

rea. The stora

tandard Procto

nstruction. Th

t compact the

ial too dry sha

f eight passes

constructed w

dike elevation

of the new s

e existing lago

or to the top o

d primary cell a

for the newly in

e to minimize e

m. The top of d

mpletion of con

etween the ex

mary cell. This

torage cell to t

e new storage

storage volum

-compacted c

storage cell

ells with interi

floor liner to a

t off wall to a m

between the

orage crops for

and the dikes

off wall would

ior and exterio

oposed lagoo

ter dike slopes

ed to a depth

age cell horiz

or Density of

e material sh

fill into a hom

all be wetted.

of a sheepsfoo

with a propose

will match th

storage cell w

on cells were

f dike. An inte

and east dike

nstalled interc

erosion. The to

dike and outsid

nstruction to p

xisting primary

excess soil ma

he west and n

e cell of 1.5 m a

e of 22,665 m

lay soils on s

or and exterior

minimum thic

minimum thick

expanded pr

r effluent irriga

s constructed

be extended

r dikes would a

n expansion

s would be con

of approximat

zontal and ve

98% and kep

hall not be s

ogeneous mas

Dike and soil

ot roller on 150

ed height of 2.5

he expanded p

will be 0.25 m

originally con

ercell pipe wou

of the new sto

cell pipe. Rip ra

op of dike surro

de slopes of th

prevent soil ero

y cell and the e

aterial would b

northwest of th

and a freeboar

3

site for a horiz

r slopes of 4H:

ckness of 1.0 m

kness of 3.0 m

imary cell and

ation.

with excavate

1.0 m into the

also be constr

site and pot

nstructed with

tely 0.2 m from

ertical liners

pt at a limited

o wet nor so

ss. Material too

liner material,

0 mm compact

5 m from the c

primary cell t

lower than t

structed with

uld be extende

orage cell. A va

ap stone would

ounding the ne

e new storage

osion.

existing second

e stockpiled a

2 - 18

he existing

rd of 1.0 m

zontal and

1V

m

d the new

ed and re-

e reworked

ucted with

tentially a

h slopes of

m the new

would be

d range of

o dry that

o wet shall

should be

ted lifts.

cell floor to

op of dike

hat of the

an overall

ed through

alve would

d be placed

ew storage

cell would

dary would

nd used to

ba

sto

Ap

2.5.17 De

Th

de

pa

De

Co

gra

2.5.18 La

Ma

ckfill any pot

orage cell. Con

pendix D.

ecommission

e existing lago

ecommissionin

ssed, or at the

ecommissionin

nservation, di

ading and seed

agoon Mainte

aintenance of t

opening

maintai

removin

maintai

monitor

samplin

effluent

maintai

dischar

ential borrow

nceptual desig

ning

oon cells will c

ng will be cons

e time a new re

ng would typi

scussing the r

ding, and futur

nance

the expanded

g and closing t

ning grass cov

ng aquatic veg

ning a program

ring liquid leve

ng lagoon efflu

t quality requir

ning records o

ging effluent f

areas or used

gn plans (Plan

continue to be

sidered and ex

eplacement lag

ically require

removal of liqu

re use of the la

lagoon will inc

he intercell va

ver on dikes to

getation growin

m to prevent a

el of lagoon cel

uent prior to t

rements

of discharge ev

from the lagoon

d on the insid

s L1 to L5) for

e utilized after

xamined by th

goon is propos

a decommiss

uid and sludge,

ands.

lude:

lve when requ

o a height of no

ng on interior s

nd remove bur

ls

he discharge

vents and wate

n storage cell o

de or outside

r the lagoon ex

r the expansio

e proponent a

ed.

sioning plan

, possible remo

ired during dis

o more than 0.3

slopes of lagoo

rrowing anima

period, in acco

er quality testi

only by spray

slope dikes o

xpansion are p

n is complete

after design ye

submitted to

oval of lagoon

scharge

3 m in height

on cells

ls

ordance with t

ng

irrigation.

2 - 19

of the new

provided in

d. Lagoon

ear 20 has

Manitoba

dikes, site

the lagoon

3

3.0 POTE

The bi

develo

3.1

ENTIAL ENVI

iophysical and

opment on the

Releases

3.1.1 Air

In

org

co

at

wo

pre

lag

pe

pro

rel

su

wi

res

Th

eq

co

3.1.2 Wa

Po

lag

typ

wa

Po

lag

eq

Su

Su

rel

wa

im

ne

dra

IRONMENTA

d socioeconom

e environment.

to Air, Wate

r

general, nuis

ganically over

mmon at the b

the surface, f

ould occur in t

edominantly b

goon may gen

eriod when wa

oduced from t

leased during

rrounding crop

nd breaks are

sidents.

ere is also a p

uipment and

nstruction are

ater

ollutants that

goon include:

pically dispos

astewater prod

ollutants that

goon expansio

uipment and s

urface Water

rface water m

leased from th

aters via sedim

pact surface

earest body of

ainage ditch.

AL IMPACTS

mic environme

er, Land

sance odours

rloaded. Odou

bottom of facu

facultative at t

the winter du

be anaerobic d

erate some od

ater temperatu

he anaerobic t

g the period

p land. Prevai

e not utilized

potential for g

transport veh

ea will meet the

may be relea

coliforms, or

sed of into th

duced by the s

have a poten

on constructio

sediments from

ay be impacte

he lagoon into

mentation or e

waters is low

f surface wat

ent as related

s occur in fac

urs are also g

ultative lagoon

the centre and

e to the ice c

uring winter a

dours for a sho

ure inversion

treatment proc

of effluent ir

ling winds in t

around the la

greenhouse ga

hicles. Impact

e minimal setb

sed into surfa

ganic wastes,

e sewer syst

ervice populat

tial to be rele

n activities, in

m soil erosion.

ed if the wastew

nearby surfac

quipment leak

w, as the lago

er, and appro

to the develo

cultative lago

generated und

ns. During the

d anaerobic at

cover on the s

nd would also

ort time each s

causes turbu

cess are broug

rrigation, as l

the area can c

agoon cells. T

s emissions d

ts from dust

back distances

ace and groun

, suspended

em in a resid

tion are expect

eased into the

nclude petrole

water is not su

ce waters. The

ks/spills during

on site is loc

oximately 300

opment, and p

oons that are

der anaerobic

summer, the

t the bottom. M

surface; the tr

include solids

spring during t

ulence in the

ght to the surf

liquid effluent

arry odours if

This can cause

during constru

generation ar

s from residenc

nd water durin

solids, and ot

dential comm

ted to be resid

e surface or g

um hydrocarb

ufficiently trea

ere is also pot

g construction

ated approxim

m from the

potential impa

e improperly

c conditions,

lagoon would

Minimal to no

reatment proc

s settling. The

the thawing o

lagoon cells a

face. Odours c

t will be spra

the area is ex

e a nuisance

uction works fr

re not expect

ces.

ng the operat

ther materials

unity. Polluta

ential in natur

ground water d

bons (PHCs) fr

ated and is sub

tential to impa

n works. The p

mately 1.1 km

nearest muni

3 - 1

acts of the

sized and

which are

be aerobic

treatment

cess would

refore, the

r turn-over

and gases

can also be

ayed over

posed and

to nearby

rom heavy

ed as the

tion of the

s that are

nts in the

e.

during the

rom heavy

bsequently

act surface

potential to

m from the

icipal road

3.2

3.3

Th

im

res

Riv

Gro

Th

or

im

3.1.3 La

Th

dis

Po

sa

co

lea

Wildlife

The propos

wildlife incl

The typical

constructio

constructio

land that

Ecosystem

lagoon exp

risk at the p

B). The exp

Fisheries

The typical

and the lag

could inclu

environmen

However, a

body and d

expected t

e effluent dis

mediate area

sult of the lag

ver) is located

oundwater

ere is a potent

forcemain pip

pacts from eq

and

e landscape w

sturbed areas

otential polluta

linity, SAR per

nstruction ac

aks, or re-fuelli

sed lagoon sit

udes white-ta

concern on a

on works. How

on works will h

is actively m

Protection Br

ansion area. M

proposed site i

anded lagoon

s

concerns for i

goon effluent d

de the reducti

nt for fish or fis

s the constru

drainage ditch

hat lagoon eff

scharge from

of release. The

goon expansio

approximately

tial for ground

pe and into th

uipment leaks

would be alte

can be impact

ants of concern

meability and

tivities are p

ing incidences

te is located

iled deer, coyo

ny constructio

wever from obs

have any signi

aintained and

ranch was con

Manitoba Cons

in the databas

will potentially

mpacts to fish

discharges int

on of water qu

sh eggs.

ction works w

h, no impacts

fluent will be

the lagoon s

ere is no poten

on project, as

y 2.0 km from

water impacts

he groundwate

s or fuel spills d

ered by the c

ed through so

n in effluent irr

Boron toxicity

redominantly

s.

in the Lake M

ote, rabbit and

on project is t

servations mad

ificant impact

d farmed. In

ntacted regard

servation indic

se (see April 14

y provide a hab

h and fish habit

o a body of su

uality or physi

will be conduct

to fish specie

taken up by t

should not ca

ntial to impact

the nearest b

the lagoon site

s if wastewate

er below. Ther

during constru

onstruction o

il erosion if not

rigation are ty

y. Pollutants th

petroleum hy

Manitoba Plain

ground squirre

hat wildlife sp

de during the s

on wildlife in

addition, the

ing the potent

cated that the

4, 2014 Email

bitat for migrat

tat are from se

urface water u

cal disturbanc

ted a consider

es from the c

the surroundi

use or contri

t the navigatio

body of navig

e.

r leaks/seeps

re is also a po

ction.

f the lagoon

t covered or re

pically: BOD, F

hat may be rel

ydrocarbons (

n Ecoregion of

el. Bird specie

pecies would b

site investigati

the area, sinc

Manitoba Co

tial for species

ere were no oc

corresponden

tory waterfowl

ediments relea

tilized by fish

ces that would

rable distance

onstruction w

ng crop veget

bute to flood

on of surface w

gable water (A

through the la

otential for gro

storage cell d

e-vegetated.

Fecal and Total

eased to the la

(PHCs) from e

f Canada. Cha

es include wate

be displaced th

ion, it is unlike

ce the site is a

nservation W

s at risk at the

ccurrences of

ce, attached in

.

ased during co

species. Thes

d create an unf

from the nea

works are expe

tation prior to

3 - 2

ing in the

waters as a

Assiniboine

agoon liner

oundwater

dikes. Any

coliforms,

and during

equipment

aracteristic

erfowl.

hrough the

ely that the

agricultural

ildlife and

e proposed

species at

n Appendix

nstruction

se impacts

favourable

rest water

ected. It is

the liquid

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7

3.8

reaching a

in periods w

irrigation) w

met.

Forestry

There are n

cleared and

Vegetatio

Characteris

areas of bo

oak groves

wheat, cere

The only ve

crop land. T

the constru

Ecosystem

their datab

of any spec

attached in

Noise Imp

There is a p

utilized dur

grass) and

noise impa

Health an

There is a p

works, as h

Heritage

The land ow

expansion s

Historic Res

that they h

2014 email

water body or

where the grou

would only occ

no potential im

d used for agric

on

stic vegetation

oreal forest an

s and rough fe

eal grains, oilse

egetation expe

There is a min

uction works, s

Protection Br

ase at the prop

cies at risk at

n Appendix B).

pacts

potential for n

ring construct

the irrigation

cts.

nd Safety

potential for im

eavy equipme

Resources

wner was not

site. The Mani

sources Branc

have no concer

l corresponden

drainage ditch

und surface is

cur once the t

mpacts to for

culture.

n in the Lake M

nd aspen park

escue grasslan

eeds and hay.

ected to be rem

nimal concern

since the expa

ranch was con

posed lagoon u

the proposed

noise impacts

ion. Other tha

spraying syst

mpacts to the h

ent will be utiliz

t aware of any

toba Historic R

ch indicated th

rns with the p

nce, attached i

h. Effluent irrig

experiencing

treated effluen

estry as the a

anitoba Plain E

land. The nat

nds. The agric

moved from th

for the remov

nsion area is a

ntacted regard

upgrade site. T

d site in the da

in the immedi

an maintenanc

em, the opera

ealth and safe

zed on site.

y historic or h

Resources Bra

at the potentia

roject. Refer t

in Appendix B.

gation will not

overland flood

nt requirement

area of the la

Ecoregion is cl

ive landscape

cultural climat

he site will be

val of rare or th

actively farme

ding occurren

The Branch ind

atabase (see A

iate area of ex

ce vehicles (fo

ation of the lag

ety of workers

heritage resou

nch was conta

al to impact sig

to the Manitob

occur during p

ding. In additio

ts of the Envir

goon expansi

lassified as be

is characteriz

te permits the

native grasse

hreatened veg

d. Manitoba C

ces of rare or

dicated that th

April 14, 2014

xpansion due t

or lagoon efflu

goon itself, will

and the public

urces located

acted regardin

gnificant herit

ba Historic Res

periods of heav

on, lagoon disc

ronment Act L

on has been

ing transitiona

zed by trembl

e growth of co

es and some a

getative specie

Conservation W

r endangered

ere were no oc

4 Email corres

to the heavy e

ent sampling

l not have a po

c during the co

at the propos

g the propose

age resources

sources Branch

3 - 3

vy rains or

charge (i.e.

icence are

previously

al between

ing aspen,

orn, spring

agricultural

es through

Wildlife and

species in

ccurrences

pondence,

equipment

or mowing

otential for

nstruction

sed lagoon

d site. The

s is low and

h June 16,

3.9

3.10

Socio-Eco

The lagoon

wastewate

Aesthetic

The lagoon

the lagoon

surrounded

onomic Impli

expansion is

r storage capa

cs

expansion is

construction w

d by agricultura

ications

not expected

acity will encou

not expected t

would occur ad

al land.

to have adve

urage continue

to have advers

djacent to the

erse socio-eco

ed growth in th

se impacts on

existing lagoo

nomic impact

e mobile home

the general a

n cells, on land

s. In fact, the

e park.

esthetics of th

d that will cont

3 - 4

increased

he area, as

tinue to be

4

4.0 MANA

Propos

the im

4.1

4.2

AGEMENT P

sed environme

mpacts identifie

Mitigation

To reduce

projected y

maximum

impacts th

result of org

Although th

or turn-ove

significant

which is ty

upgrade wo

centre of th

Emissions

maintenanc

methods (i

dust throug

the setback

nearby resi

Mitigation

Surface Wa

Impacts to

be treated t

periods of h

flooding aro

the lagoon.

To minimiz

should out

materials d

wording sim

Die

fue

reg

RACTICE

ental managem

ed above.

n of Impacts

the potential

year 20 organ

allowable orga

e odours gene

ganic over-load

he lagoon wou

er period, and

nuisance to th

ypically a sign

ould be located

he nearest com

from constru

ce by the con

.e. water spra

gh constructio

k distance from

idents.

n of Impacts

ater

surface water

to the requirem

heavy rain or i

ound the lagoo

This would pre

e impacts fro

line to the co

during constru

milar to the foll

esel or gasolin

el containers

gulations

ment practices

s to Air

for odour nui

nic loadings,

anic loading r

erated from a

ding are not ex

ld likely gener

during the p

he mobile hom

nificant contri

d a minimum o

mmunity.

uction equipm

ntractor, and

ying) will be u

n activities an

m residences,

s to Water

from discharg

ments of the E

n periods whe

on would be un

event effluent

m constructio

ontractor the

uction, as per f

lowing:

ne should be s

for volumes g

s to be employ

isance in the

from the mob

rate of 56 kg

wastewater t

xpected.

rate some odo

eriods of irrig

me park reside

butor of odou

of 300 metres

ment and tran

will meet all

utilized at the

nd transport, a

it is unlikely t

ge of lagoon eff

nvironment Ac

re the ground

nlikely as ther

from reaching

on equipment

requirements

federal and pr

stored in doub

greater than 6

yed to prevent

community, t

bile home par

g BOD5/ha/day

treatment lago

urs for a short

ation, odour i

ents, as the lag

urs to a lagoo

from the near

nsport vehicle

provincial an

construction s

nd becomes a

that dust will h

fluent are not e

ct Licence. Eff

surface is exp

e are no signif

g a nearby wate

on surface wa

for handling

rovincial regul

ble walled tan

8.2 L (15 gall

t or mitigate ad

the primary c

rk. This takes

into the lago

oon. Therefore

t time each sp

mpacts are n

goon does not

n. Furthermor

rest resident a

s will be con

d local stand

site if dry con

nuisance to n

have any impa

expected, as t

fluent irrigation

periencing ove

ficant bodies o

er way or drain

aters, the con

and storage

ations. The sp

ks or have co

ons) or in com

dverse implica

ell will be siz

into conside

oon primary c

e, nuisance od

pring, during th

ot expected t

t receive septa

re, the propos

and 460 metre

ntrolled throug

ards. Dust su

ditions create

nearby residen

act on the com

he lagoon efflu

n would not oc

rland flooding

of water in the

nage course.

nstruction spe

of fuels and

pecification sh

ntainment dik

mpliance with

4 - 1

ations from

ed for the

eration the

cell, which

dours as a

he thawing

to cause a

age waste,

sed lagoon

es from the

gh regular

uppression

excessive

nts. Due to

mmunity or

uent would

ccur during

. Overland

vicinity of

cifications

hazardous

ould state

kes around

provincial

4.3

Cle

co

Fu

loc

Wa

co

Ha

inc

In

no

The specific

Co

lub

Th

Groundwat

Seepage of

would utiliz

1 x 10-7 cm/

Mitigation

handling, e

surface wat

Mitigation

As the new

is expected

pollutants

procedures

To minimiz

constructe

with grass.

To ensure s

periodically

to a differen

ean up materia

mmercial sorb

el storage an

cated a minimu

aste hazardou

llected and dis

azardous mate

cluding WHMIS

the event of s

otify the projec

cations should

nstruction eq

bricants, hydra

ere can be no

er

f effluent from

ze a reworked

/sec or less, as

of potential i

equipment lea

ters.

n of Impacts

lagoon storag

d to be negligi

into the soil, t

s should be foll

e the potentia

d dikes would

salinization an

y sample the s

nt portion of la

al should be a

bent, 30 m2 of 6

nd hazardous

um of 100 m fr

us materials

sposed of in co

erial handling

S and spill cont

pills or leaks o

ct engineer and

d state that wh

quipment is to

aulic fluids or c

re-fueling or se

m the lagoon i

clay liner, hav

s required by M

mpacts to gr

aks or fuel sp

s to Land

e cell would be

ble. To minim

the mitigation

lowed.

al for slope er

be constructe

nd toxicity of th

soils for levels

and.

available at the

6 mil PVC, and

material area

rom a water bo

from construc

ompliance with

and storage

tainment requi

of fuels and haz

d provincial au

hen working ne

o be properly

coolants

ervicing of con

s unlikely to a

ving a minimum

Manitoba Cons

roundwater du

ills, would fol

e lined with a r

ize the potent

measures des

rosion on the

ed at 4H:1V an

he receiving la

of sodium and

e site, consist

an empty fuel

as established

ody, and comp

ction activitie

h provincial reg

are to follow

irements

zardous mater

thorities.

ear water with c

maintained t

nstruction equ

affect groundw

m thickness of

ervation.

uring the lago

low the same

e-worked clay

tial for the rele

scribed in Sec

new storage

d the dike top

and does not o

d boron. If leve

ing of a minim

barrel for spil

d for project

ly with provinc

s and equipm

gulations

all provincial

rials, the contr

construction e

to prevent lea

ipment within

water as the n

f 1.0 m and a h

oon construct

e procedures

liner, seepage

ease of Petrole

ction 4.2 above

cell, the outs

s and outside

occur, the land

els do become

mum of 25 kg o

l collection and

construction

cial regulations

ment must be

and federal r

ractor or opera

equipment:

aks and spills

100 m of a wa

new lagoon st

hydraulic cond

ion activities

as described

e to the surrou

eum Hydrocar

e outlining fue

ide slopes of

slopes would

owner is enco

e high, irrigatio

4 - 2

of suitable

d disposal

should be

s

e properly

egulations

ator should

s of fuels,

ater body.

torage cell

ductivity of

from fuel

above for

nding land

rbon (PHC)

el-handling

the newly

be seeded

ouraged to

on will shift

4.4

4.5

4.6

Mitigation

To minimize

mufflers wo

Mitigation

To minimiz

have a sa

regulations

protective e

Mitigation

If any sig

constructio

the land ow

may be req

n of Noise Im

e the potentia

orking properly

n of Impacts

e impacts to

fety program

s. During cons

equipment wil

n of Impacts

nificant histo

on, the works a

wner, Manitoba

uired.

mpacts

l for noise imp

y, and constru

s to Health a

health and sa

in place, in

struction, site

l be worn in ac

s to Heritage

oric or heritag

are to tempora

a Historic Res

pacts, construc

ction activities

and Safety

fety of worke

accordance w

access will b

cordance with

e Resources

ge resources

arily cease an

ources Branch

ction equipme

s should be lim

rs and the pu

with all feder

be limited to t

h the contracto

are discover

d an investiga

h and any oth

ent and transp

mited to dayligh

blic, the const

ral and provin

the construct

or’s safety prog

red in the co

ation of the sit

er provincial a

ort vehicles sh

ht hours only.

truction contr

ncial health a

ion crew only

gram.

ourse of exca

te is to be con

and federal au

4 - 3

hould have

actor is to

and safety

. Personal

avation or

nducted by

thority, as

5

5.0 RESI

Residu

expres

No ne

treatm

the cr

occurr

that w

DUAL AND C

ual environme

ssed in quantit

gative residua

ment lagoon, d

rops and the

ring over time.

will allow for exp

CUMULATIVE

ental effects re

tative terms re

al effects are a

ue to the mitig

soils in the a

. Positive resid

pansion of the

E EFFECTS

emaining afte

elative to base

anticipated thr

gation measure

reas of efflue

dual effects ar

e mobile home

er the applicat

eline conditions

ough the cons

es described a

ent irrigation,

re expected fro

park in the fut

tion of mitigat

s

struction and o

above. The lan

to ensure tha

om the properl

ture.

tion measures

operation of th

d owner shoul

at salinization

y sized wastew

s, to the exten

he expanded w

d however be

or soil toxicit

water treatme

5 - 1

nt possible

wastewater

inspecting

ty are not

ent system

6

6.0 MON

Propos

survei

Monito

operat

lagoon

ensur

maint

the lag

to ens

ITORING AN

sed follow-up

illance, audit, e

oring of the lag

ted under the

n cells are mai

e water qualit

ain records of

goon, the owne

sure that grass

ND FOLLOW-

activities tha

etc.)

goon operation

requirements

intained within

y parameters,

irrigation even

er is to contac

s growth occur

-UP

at will be requ

n is to be cond

s of the Enviro

n the required

, as described

nts and water q

t the local env

s on slopes an

uired at any s

ducted by a tra

onment Act lic

limits, conduc

d in the Enviro

quality monito

vironment offic

nd disturbed ar

stage of deve

ained lagoon o

cence. The ope

ct sampling of

onment Act lice

oring. If there a

cer to discuss o

reas after the c

elopment (eg.

perator, who is

erator is to en

f lagoon efflue

ence, are met

are any conce

options. The co

construction a

Monitoring, in

s to ensure the

nsure liquid lev

nt prior to irrig

. The operator

rns with the op

onstruction co

ctivities are co

6 - 1

nspection,

e lagoon is

vels in the

gation, and

r is also to

peration of

ontractor is

ompleted.

7

7.0 FUND

Name

loan oflicenc

projec

The p

requir

lagoon

Federa

DING AND AP

and address o

of capital fundes, permits, au

ct’s application

roject is being

red for the lago

n with Environ

al Wastewater

PPROVALS

of any Governm

s have been ruthorizations,

n or approval.

g funded priva

oon constructi

nment Canada

r Systems Efflu

ment Agency o

requested (wh etc. known to

ately by the l

ion and operat

and providing

uent Regulatio

or program (fe

here applicableo be required fo

lagoon owner.

tion. The lago

g annually mo

ns.

ederal, provinc

e). Other fedefor the propose

. No addition

on owner will a

onitoring repo

ial or otherwis

eral, provincial ed developmen

al approvals,

also be respon

rts to Environ

se) from which

or municipal nt, and the sta

licences or pe

nsible for regis

ment Canada

7 - 1

h a grant or

approvals, atus of the

ermits are

stering the

under the

8

8.0 PUBL

Result

Public

park. T

by Ma

LIC CONSUL

ts of any public

c consultation

The residents w

nitoba Conser

LTATION

c consultation

by the lagoon

will be made aw

vation through

ns undertaken

owner has no

ware of the pro

h the public reg

or to be under

ot been conduc

oject works pri

gistry during t

rtaken in conju

cted to date fo

ior to construc

he Environmen

unction with pr

or the resident

ction. Public co

ntal Act Propos

roject planning

ts of in the mo

omments will b

sal review peri

8 - 1

g.

obile home

be received

od.

9

9.0 CONC

Based

above

The pr

that th

JR Cou

the fin

CLUSION

d on the design

e, no significan

roponent woul

he lagoon cons

usin Consultan

nal licence.

n of the projec

t negative env

ld like to comp

struction can b

nts Ltd. reques

ct and the imp

vironmental im

plete the requ

begin in a time

sts that a draf

plementation o

mpacts are anti

irements of th

ly fashion.

ft copy of the

of the mitigatio

cipated.

he Environmen

licence be forw

on measures,

nt Act Proposa

warded for rev

identified in S

l as soon as p

view prior to th

9 - 1

Section 4.0

possible so

he issue of

APPENDICES

Appendix A Land Title

Crown Lands & Property Agency – Lands Branch, May 9, 2014 Email Correspondence

Appendix B Table 1: Bowes Mobile Home Park Lagoon - Population, Hydraulic, and Organic Loading

Projections to Design Year 20

Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship - Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, April 14, 2014 Email Correspondence

Manitoba Tourism, Culture, Sport and Consumer Protection – Historic Resources Branch, June 16, 2014 Email Correspondence

Appendix C Test Hole Logs

National Testing Laboratories Ltd. Soils Analysis Report, September 11, 2013

Driller’s Well Logs

Appendix D Title Page

Plan L1: Existing Lagoon and Test Hole Location Plan

Plan L2: Expanded Lagoon with Setbacks

Plan L3: Proposed Lagoon Expansion Layout Plan

Plan L4: Dike Details

Plan L5: Silt Fence, Valve, Valve Marker and Rip Rap Details

Appendix A

Land Title

Crown Lands & Property Agency – Lands Branch, May 9, 2014 Email Correspondence

Appendix B

Table 1: Bowes Mobile Home Park Lagoon - Population, Hydraulic, and Organic Loading Projections to Design Year 20

Manitoba Conservation Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, April 14, 2014 Email Correspondence

Manitoba Tourism, Culture, Sport and Consumer Protection – Historic Resources Branch, June 16, 2013 Email Correspondence

Table 1: Bowes Mobile Home Park - Population, Hydraulic, and Organic Loading Projections to Design Year 20

F:\400\482 Bowes\482.03 Lagoon Expansion EAP\03 Design\[Table 1.xls] Table 1

B-482.03

Col 1 Col 2 Col 3 Col 4 Col 5 Col 6 Col 7 Col 8 Col 9 Col 10

Mobile Home Mobile Home Daily per Capita Daily Wastewater Wastewater Volume Daily per Capita B.O.D. Daily B.O.D. Primary Cell

Lots PopulationWastewater Production* Production For 230 Days Production Area Req'd at 0.75 m

Growth per year Growth per year Mobile Home Park All Sources All Sources Mobile Home Park All Sources (@56kgBOD/ha/day)

3.3% 3.3% (litres) (cu. m.) (cu. m.) (kg) (kg) (sq. m.)

2014 0 110 275 466 51 11,790 0.076 20.9 3,732

2015 1 114 284 466 53 12,178 0.076 21.6 3,855

2016 2 117 293 466 55 12,578 0.076 22.3 3,982

2017 3 121 303 466 56 12,992 0.076 23.0 4,113

2018 4 125 313 466 58 13,420 0.076 23.8 4,248

2019 5 129 323 466 60 13,861 0.076 24.6 4,388

2020 6 134 334 466 62 14,317 0.076 25.4 4,532

2021 7 138 345 466 64 14,788 0.076 26.2 4,681

2022 8 143 356 466 66 15,275 0.076 27.1 4,835

2023 9 147 368 466 69 15,777 0.076 28.0 4,994

2024 10 152 380 466 71 16,296 0.076 28.9 5,159

2025 11 157 393 466 73 16,832 0.076 29.8 5,328

2026 12 162 406 466 76 17,386 0.076 30.8 5,504

2027 13 168 419 466 78 17,958 0.076 31.8 5,685

2028 14 173 433 466 81 18,549 0.076 32.9 5,872

2029 15 179 447 466 83 19,159 0.076 34.0 6,065

2030 16 185 462 466 86 19,790 0.076 35.1 6,265

2031 17 191 477 466 89 20,441 0.076 36.2 6,471

2032 18 197 492 466 92 21,113 0.076 37.4 6,684

2033 19 203 509 466 95 21,808 0.076 38.7 6,903

2034 20 210 525 466 98 22,525 0.076 40 7,131

* From measured water use records and including 15% infiltration

TABLE 1: BOWES MOBILE HOME PARK LAGOON - POPULATION, HYDRAULIC AND ORGANIC LOADING PROJECTIONS TO DESIGN YEAR 20

Calendar Year Design Year

Hydraulic Loading Organic LoadingPopulation

Manitoba Conservation Wildlife and Ecosystem Protection Branch, April 14, 2013 Email Correspondence

Manitoba Tourism, Culture, Sport and Consumer Protection – Historic Resources Branch, June 16, 2013 Email Correspondence

Appendix C

Test Hole Logs

National Testing Laboratories Ltd. Soils Analysis Report, September 11, 2013

Driller’s Well Logs

Test Hole Logs

National Testing Laboratories Ltd. Soils Analysis Report, September 11, 2013

Driller’s Well Logs

Appendix D

Title Page

Plan L1: Existing Lagoon and Test Hole Location Plan

Plan L2: Expanded Lagoon with Setbacks

Plan L3: Proposed Lagoon Expansion Layout Plan

Plan L4: Dike Details

Plan L5: Silt Fence, Valve, Valve Marker and Rip Rap Details

PLAN INDEX

LAGOONPLAN L1. EXISTING LAGOON AND TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN

PLAN L2. EXPANDED LAGOON WITH SETBACKS

PLAN L3. PROPOSED LAGOON EXPANSION LAYOUT PLAN

PLAN L4. DIKE DETAILS

PLAN L5. SILT FENCE, VALVE, VALVE MARKER AND RIP RAP DETAILS

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

Certificate of AuthorizationJ.R. Cousin Consultants Ltd.

No. 234 Date: 15/01/29

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Certificate of AuthorizationJ.R. Cousin Consultants Ltd.

No. 234 Date: 15/01/29

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Certificate of AuthorizationJ.R. Cousin Consultants Ltd.

No. 234 Date: 15/01/29

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Certificate of AuthorizationJ.R. Cousin Consultants Ltd.

No. 234 Date: 15/01/29

JR Cousin Consultants Ltd.91A Scurfield Blvd. Winnipeg MB R3Y 1G4

p. (204) 489-0474

f. (204) 489-0487www.jrcc.ca

ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE SINCE 1981

PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

Certificate of AuthorizationJ.R. Cousin Consultants Ltd.

No. 234 Date: 15/01/29