bow ties and offshore safety studies
DESCRIPTION
The possibility of using bow ties in all the safety case Formal Safety assessments (FSA)is discussed in this brief note. Bow Tie Analysis (BTA) is a simple but effective technique to demonstrate Major Hazard Management (MHM).TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Bow Ties and Offshore Safety Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081821/55287434550346bc588b47ed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Bow ties and Offshore Safety Studies
Pillai Sreejith
Bow Ties and Offshore Safety Case i) Introduction:
Bow Tie Assessment (BTA) technique, initiated by Shell is widely used to demonstrate Major
Hazard Management (MHM) efforts of offshore operators. Moreover, bow tie is a simple graphic
representation and is understood by a wide range of audience, not only by HSE managers.
HEMP (Hazards & Effects Management Process) by operating companies is a UK Safety Case
Regulation 2005 requirement and obviously BTA is an effective tool to demonstrate HEMP.
Typically, the left side of the bow contains control / preventative barriers and the right side
contains mitigation / recovery measures. It is the Shell practice to identify escalation controls for
each of the barriers and recovery measures. HSE / Safety Critical Elements (SCE) are part of
barriers / recovery measure whereas HSE / Safety Critical Activities are part of the escalation
controls.
In this note, the possibilities of using bow ties in safety case assessments are explained.
ii) Safety Case Application of Bow Tie Assessment (BTA):
If bow ties are constructed for each of the MAEs (Major Accident Events) or MAH (Major Accident
Hazards) based on the HAZID (Hazard Identification), these bow ties can be modified for each of
the FSA (Formal Safety Assessment) studies to demonstrate that the assessments are in
compliance in UK SCR (Safety Case Regulations), 2005. BTA can be used in all offshore FSA
studies and the possibilities and approach are explained in the table below:
FSA Study Bow Tie Application
HAZID Once the MAEs are identified, develop bow ties with all safety
systems /barriers and the recommended barriers for each of
the MAE.
ESSA
(Emergency System Survivability
Assessment)
The mitigation safety systems on the right side of bow tie
(emergency systems) will have to be assessed for survivability
during their designed performance objective.
ETRERA
(Escape, Temporary Refuge,
Evacuation and Rescue Analysis)
Specific bow ties may be developed for escape, evacuation,
refuge and rescue emergency situations to demonstrate that
all SOLAS (Safety of Life At Sea) required are in place based
Safety Case BowSafety Case BowSafety Case BowSafety Case Bow TiesTiesTiesTies
![Page 2: Bow Ties and Offshore Safety Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081821/55287434550346bc588b47ed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Bow ties and Offshore Safety Studies
Pillai Sreejith
on potential impairment conditions.
FEA
(Fire and Explosion Assessment)
Specific bow ties for fire, explosion, and gas release may be
developed to demonstrate that all these MAEs are controlled
and mitigated using adequate barriers based on potential
impairment conditions.
NHHA
(Non-Hydrocarbon Hazard
Assessment)
Specific bow ties for dropped objects, ship collision and
transportation risks may be developed to demonstrate that all
these MAEs are controlled and mitigated using adequate
barriers based on potential impairment conditions.
QRA
(Quantitative Risk Assessment)
The impairment frequencies of MAEs can be calculated with
inputs from FEA & NHHA studies by using Fault Trees (FTA)
on the left side of bow and Event Tree (ET) on the right side of
the bow. One bow tie per each of the MAE could be
developed as part of QRA to demonstrate that all threats and
barriers are considered while calculating impairment
frequencies.
ALARP Demonstration For a brown field QRA, the risk levels should be calculated
based on actual SCE/safety barrier performance. Traffic light
system could be used to represent performance of safety
barriers in the bow tie diagram. If all the barriers are
performing as designed / desired (Green), then the installation
is regarded as ‘Safe to Operate’ and ALARP.
Verification Scheme The Written Scheme of Examination (WSE) as part of SCE
(Safety Critical Element) verification could be demonstrated by
developing bow ties with specific inputs from Performance
Standards (PS).
HSE Safety Case In the FSA summary section, the bow ties developed in all
assessments could be included. Finally, based on safety
assessments, consolidated bow ties could be developed for all
MAEs in line with potential impairment of defined sensitive
receivers.
![Page 3: Bow Ties and Offshore Safety Studies](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022081821/55287434550346bc588b47ed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Bow ties and Offshore Safety Studies
Pillai Sreejith
iii) Conclusion:
Although the use of bow ties is now a common practice in safety cases, its use in all FSA studies
will help to provide a consistent assessment track for all MAEs in all stages of assessment.
Moreover, bow ties are graphic representations which are easy to understand by all and are
capable to communicating technically complex results in a simple and straight forward manner.
Author:
Pillai Sreejith