book review
DESCRIPTION
Critical Review of Kurt Vonnegut's "2BR02B".TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Book Review](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071709/55cf8eff550346703b97e428/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Smith 1
Alyssa Smith
Ms. Dearing
English 106
3 March 2015
Eternal Dilemma
Although dystopian novels are common and many people feel they do not relate to the
world we live in, most dystopian stories contain themes that our society struggles with. My
analysis of “2BR02B” by Kurt Vonnegut will demonstrate that even though it may be a work of
fiction, the underlying theme of population control by government regulations is something that
we can relate to in our own society, and I would recommend this story to anyone of mature age
with spare time on their hands.
Vonnegut begins his gruesome tale in the waiting room of the delivery ward at a hospital.
We are introduced to Mr. Wehling, who is waiting for his wife to deliver triplets. On a day where
any first time father should be bursting with joy, Mr. Wehling is morose, dreading his situation.
In Vonnegut’s futuristic society, the world has found a cure for aging. No one dies of disease or
old age, they are eternally young. This sounds like a wonderful world to live in, but if no one is
dying they must enforce strict population control so the world does not become overpopulated.
In order to accomplish this, every time a new soul is to be born, someone must sacrifice their
own life by volunteering to die in order to make way for a new generation. In order for Mr.
Wehling to have all of his children to live he must find three volunteers, otherwise his children’s
lives will be terminated. He has found only one volunteer so far, his grandfather; so he is faced
with the impossible problem of deciding which of his children get to live. Vonnegut then
introduces Dr. Hintz and Ms. Duncan, the delivery doctor and hostess. They do not appear to be
![Page 2: Book Review](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071709/55cf8eff550346703b97e428/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Smith 2
alarmed or worried about their lives because they are necessary to their world and do not have to
consider committing suicide themselves. Because of this, readers see the building tension
between the doctor and Ms. Duncan unfold.
In “2BR02B”, Vonnegut stresses the negative effects of population control on the general
public. “The law said that no newborn child could survive unless the parents of the child could
find someone who would volunteer to die,” (Vonnegut 11). Since everyone in this society has the
ability to live forever, it is extremely hard to find volunteers to sacrifice themselves in order for
someone to have children. In this particular instance, Mr. Wehling can only find one volunteer
for his three newborn babies, his grandfather. Not only would he lose someone dear to him, he
would not even be able to save all of his children. Therefore, he must choose which innocent
infant must be sacrificed as well. Although the society had seemingly good intentions by
regulating population, they were causing deeper, more controversial issues with those affected by
it.
As mentioned earlier, these negative affects displayed in “2BR02B” only affect the
general public, not the people higher up in society, like Ms. Duncan and Dr. Hintz. They justify
themselves and their actions by stating, “Without population control, human beings would now
be packed on this surface of this old planet like drupelets on a blackberry!” (Vonnegut 12).
Doctors and Hostesses of the Bureau believe that since they discovered the cure for aging, if they
did not use population control, people would continue to multiply until they used up all of the
world’s resources and destroy themselves. It is easy for them to point these fingers because they
know they are not the ones who will have to sacrifice themselves because there is a sense of
urgency for them, unlike people in other professions like Mr. Wehling.
![Page 3: Book Review](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071709/55cf8eff550346703b97e428/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Smith 3
I believe that population control is something readers can easily relate to because it is
something we as a society struggle with. An example in our society was the issue in China where
the government mandated how many children each family was allowed to have due to
overpopulation in their country. Because of this many families valued the lives of sons over the
lives of daughters because only sons could carry on the family name. Multiple problems
stemmed from this including newborn babies being thrown away in trash cans or in the streets,
especially infant girls. Also, since families were mainly keeping sons, the male to female ratio
was thrown extremely off balance and made it harder for those sons to carry on the family name
and reproduce because there are not enough females.
I believe that by reading “2BR02B” we gain a new perspective on our society,
specifically about population control by government regulation. “The way that we learn lessons
from those who are no longer with us, that humanity has built on itself, progressed, made
knowledge incremental rather than something that has to be relearned, over and over,”
(Gailman). Gailman states that by reading fiction we can learn from the past so that we can plan
for the future. I believe this also applies to learning from Vonnegut’s perception of the future and
how it relates to our society today. He offers insight to population control and even though it is
much more extreme than the problems we face today, we can still learn from this fictional
society to help save our own.
Although we do not have the cure for aging as shown in “2BR02B”, Vonnegut raises
issues that readers can relate to. Population control and government regulations are something
our society has in common with Vonnegut’s dystopia, although it is not as extreme. Since we can
expand our thoughts on these themes and get a different perspective, I believe that all young
![Page 4: Book Review](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071709/55cf8eff550346703b97e428/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Smith 4
adults/adults should read Vonnegut’s extremely interesting, although ghastly, dystopian short
story.
Works Cited
![Page 5: Book Review](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071709/55cf8eff550346703b97e428/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Smith 5
Vonnegut, Kurt. 2BR02B. Auckland: Floating, 1962. Print.
Gaiman, Neil. "Why Our Future Depends on Libraries, Reading, and Daydreaming." The
Guardian. 15 Oct 2013. Web.