bmr case study
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 1C h a l l e n g e U s
![Page 2: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 2
8th Interactive workshop on
SUCCESSFUL EPC CONTRACTING IN INDIA
SIMULATED CASE STUDY
December 2, 2010 | Hotel ITC Grand | Mumbai
![Page 3: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 3
DISCLAIMER
This presentation provides general information existing as at the
time of preparation. The presentation is meant for general
guidance and no responsibility for loss arising to any person acting
or refraining from acting as a result of any material contained in this
publication will be accepted by BMR Advisors. It is recommended
that professional advice be taken based on the specific facts and
circumstances. This presentation does not substitute the need to
refer to the original pronouncements
![Page 4: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 4Case Study | 4
DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION
Mumbai cityNavi Mumbai
Airport
1km
Metro & Road Lines
Road entry
Metro station
Port
SEZ
Landmass
Over Sea
2km22km
2km
2km
2km19km
Power plant
![Page 5: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 5
TENDER DETAILS/ RELEVANT FACTS
Design, engineering, procurement of equipment and
materials, construction, erection, installation and
commissioning of road and metro via sea link from Sewri
(Mumbai) to Navi Mumbai (Panvel) with triple exits at Navi
Mumbai to the Airport, Navi Mumbai SEZ and Nhava Sheva
port
Bids inviting to executing above on a cash contract (CC)
basis
The Bidder shall quote a lump-sum, fixed, turnkey price for
the EPC Contract, individually a member of the consortium
The sum quoted by the Bidder shall be inclusive of all duties,
taxes, fees, octroi and other levies, materials, labour etc
![Page 6: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 6
TENDER DETAILS/ RELEVANT FACTS
The Bidder shall take into account all tax, fiscal benefits and
other concessions that may be available to it and indicate
material assumptions in this regard
Stock yard in Mumbai-Sewri and Navi Mumbai- Panvel shall
be made available free of cost to the Contractor for stocking
and related processing purposes
The ownership of the plant and equipment (including spare
parts and tools & tackles) procured shall be transferred to the
Authority on delivery or post commissioning of the Project for
bids, as may be agreed mutually
Change in law/ taxes to exclude any change in rate of taxes
per se
![Page 7: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 7
GROUP I
‘OF CO’
FOREIGN BIDDER
![Page 8: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 8
GROUP I – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
OF Co is a foreign contractor and tax resident of Germany
OF Co responsible for supply of signaling and ticketing
equipment for the metro project
Importation of goods likely to be from group entities in
Germany
Scope of work inter-alia involves installation and
commissioning of such equipment
As part of the consortium OF Co propose to bid for the
project but concerned about PE constitution
OF Co is considering setting up a subsidiary in India („OF
Co India‟) for the purpose of executing the onshore work for
the Project, thus under consideration
![Page 9: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 9
The equipment required to execute this Project has to be imported from OF Co or its group companies around the world; you have the option to route such supply of equipment for the Project through OF Co India as well
Software is a crucial component of the installation and commissioning process for the equipment; the customized software is developed by OF Co and can be supplied through variable means (including a direct download). Ownership of the software would vest in MMRDA at inception
The testing, installation and commissioning of the signaling and ticketing equipment would be done by OF Co India; OF Co India could work in the role of the sub-contractor or the main contractor/ consortium partner
Payments will be separately made by MMRDA to OF Co/ OF Co India for completion of work as per the specified schedule
GROUP I – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
![Page 10: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 10
GROUP I - DELIVERABLES
Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE perspective,
depending on whether the OF Co or OF Co India is the
consortium partner
How can you minimize the PE exposure, if any
What are the indirect tax implications between OF Co/ OF Co
India and MMRDA on the above transaction
Would OF Co be liable to pay service tax?
![Page 11: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study | 11
Part 2
Analyze and identify risk factors and suggest amendments on
the following aspects of the tender :
Liquidated Damages
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
GROUP I - DELIVERABLES
![Page 12: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 12
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the OF Co or OF Co
India is the consortium partner
The income on offshore supply shall not be liable to tax in
India, subject to the satisfaction of the following two conditions:
If the ownership of the equipments is transferred outside India/
high seas; and
The payment is made to OF Co outside India in foreign currency
This view has been supported by various judicial precedents
(IHI ltd‟s case, Hyundai Heavy Industry‟s case and Roxon‟s
case)………..
![Page 13: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 13
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the OF Co or OF Co
India is the consortium partner
Supply of software
The issue relating to characterisation of software income is far from
settled.
There are various judgements at ITAT level which support the view that
the transfer of software is like a transfer of goods, however, in a recent
ruling of Delhi tribunal in case of Microsoft Corporation it was held that
the use of software shall be classified as „royalty‟
Two recent Mumbai Bench of ITAT have rendered favourable rulings on
taxability of supply of off-the-shelf software – Reliance Comm case; and
Tata Communication Ltd
![Page 14: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 14
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the OF Co or OF
Co India is the consortium partner
Supply of software (contd) In the present case, the software is a highly customised software; also,
the copyright in the software shall be owned by Project Owner and not
the supplier
Given the fact pattern, consideration for customised software is likely to
be characterised as „fee for technical service‟ or „royalty‟
![Page 15: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 15
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the OF Co or OF Co
India is the consortium partner
Installation and commissioning services
If carried out by the Indian subsidiary as:
the principle contractor for this scope – no income tax implication for
German contractor – this would require an assignment of the
onshore installation part
the sub-contractor of principle contractor for this scope – need to
examine whether time spent by Indian Sub can ne attributed to the
German company and hence constitute a PE
![Page 16: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 16
RESPONSES – Part 1
How can you minimize the PE exposure, if any
In order to minimise any risk of income attribution, separate
contracts should be entered for offshore supply of equipments
(ie the work to be performed by OF Co) and the onshore
installation and commissioning (ie the work to be performed by
OF Co India).
![Page 17: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 17
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between OF Co/ OF
Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction ?
Import and sale of equipment
Importation of equipment liable to customs duty; concessional duty under
the Project Import Scheme could be available (ie BCD @ 5%)
Valuation from a customs perspective could be a larger concern if OF Co/
OF Co India imports equipment into India; given this, a direct supply of
equipment to MMRDA can be considered (which would limit VAT outgo as
well), preferably on a DDU (INCOTERMS) basis
Sale of equipment by OF Co India liable to applicable VAT/CST unless
SICOI benefits are structured
Key ingredients of SICOI
Contract with the Authority should recognize that the equipment shall be
imported
If possible, the details of offshore vendor should also be be mentioned in the
contract, etc
![Page 18: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 18
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between OF Co/ OF
Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction ?
Import and supply of software
Electronic import of (operational) software shall not trigger customs duty
implications; however, service tax would be payable on development and
implementation of the (operational) software; while VAT should not apply
as a „work for hire‟
Physical import of (operational) software may trigger customs duty
implications as it is not a shrink-wrap software meant for re-sale; service
tax and VAT implications would be same as above
![Page 19: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 19
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between OF Co/ OF
Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction? Comment
on OF Co’s liability to pay service tax
Installation and commissioning services
Activity is liable to service tax
If OF Co contractually renders these services, its operations should
constitute a business establishment from which services are rendered. In
such case, OF Co will be liable to pay tax
In case OF Co India acts as a sub-contractor to OF Co (non-resident
entity), service tax would be payable as OF Co India‟s service will not
qualify as an export. However, since OF Co will operate in India, credit
should be available based on judicial rulings
![Page 20: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 20
RESPONSES – Part 2
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Supply of equipment directly from OF Co in Germany
Installation and commissioning services should be undertaken
by OF Co India; OF Co should (if required) provide support to
OF Co India
Segregation of scope of work between OF Co and OF Co
India should be reviewed
![Page 21: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 21
GROUP II
‘PP CO’
INDIAN BIDDER
![Page 22: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 22
GROUP II - FACTUAL BACKGROUND
PP Co is a domestic contractor to sets up coal based power
plants, proposes to bid for setting up a power plant in the
designated area in the Nhava Sheva port
It would procure all the equipment from third parties and
undertake the civil construction and installation and
commissioning of the power project on it own
The minimum capacity of power plant would be 850 MW (with
reasonably committed off-take(s) of 150 MW for the Project,
150 MW by the proposed Navi Mumbai international airport
and 550 MW by the Navi Mumbai SEZ)
Coal supply up to 1200 MW is being committed by the State
agencies
![Page 23: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 23
Part 1
Based on the committed offtake for the bids and the Project
bidding process, do you think it you would be more efficient to
set up a Mega Power Project (MPP) ie over 1000 MW and
what would be the decision making parameters for the same
Would this power plant qualify for an MPP status
Assuming that the power plant qualifies for an MPP status,
what tax benefits would be available
Assuming that the power plant does not qualify for an MPP
status, what tax benefits would be available
Does supply of power to the Navi Mumbai SEZ provide any
additional benefits
GROUP II – DELIVERABLES
![Page 24: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 24
Part 2
Analyze and identify risk factors and suggest amendments on
the following aspects of the tender :
Liquidated Damages,
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
GROUP II – DELIVERABLES
![Page 25: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 25
Part 2 (Cont)
Do you forsee any risk of the consortium being taxed as an
Association of Persons
GROUP II – DELIVERABLES
![Page 26: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 26
RESPONSES – Part 1
Do you think it would be more efficient to set up a MPP ie over 1000 MW and what would be the decision making parameters for the same
Setting up of an MPP as compared to setting up on a non-MPP is beneficial as larger tax benefits available in the former case
Decision to be impacted by the following considerations
Constraints in obtaining the MPP status per se
Availability of fuel
Ability to sell surplus power
Would this power plant qualify for an MPP status
MPP status may not be a possibile of the capacity of proposed power project is 1000 MW or more
![Page 27: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 27
RESPONSES – Part 1
Assuming that the power plant qualifies for an MPP
status, what tax benefits would be available
Benefit Availability
Project Import linked customs duty
exemption*
Excise Duty Exemption
Advance Authorization*
Deemed Export Drawback
Terminal Excise Duty Refund
* In-principle availability indicated, may not be available for certain supplies
![Page 28: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 28
RESPONSES – Part 1
Assuming that the power plant does not qualify for an
MPP status, what tax benefits would be available
Benefit Availability
Project Import linked customs duty
exemption*
Excise Duty Exemption
Advance Authorization* #
Deemed Export Drawback #
Terminal Excise Duty Refund #
?* In-principle availability indicated, may not be available for certain supplies
# ICB pre-condition for advancement of benefit
![Page 29: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 29
RESPONSES – Part 1
Income Tax benefits to power producers
Under the provisions of the Income tax Act, 1961, an
undertaking engaged in the generation of power is eligible for
a tax holiday for 10 consecutive years in a block of 15 years
beginning from the year in which the business commences
operations; however there are certain issues with respect to
tax holidays like difficulty to determine the revenue from
generation of electricity used for captive consumption.
![Page 30: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 30
RESPONSES – Part 1
Does supply of power to the Navi Mumbai SEZ provide
any additional benefits
Export benefits against supply of power to SEZs (here approx
65% of the committed off-take) could be examined – This
issue is debatable
Likley duty benefits could be
For capex phase – under the EPCG scheme
For opex phase – for procument of fuel, etc
![Page 31: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 31
RESPONSES – Part 1
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Substantial benefits (for non-MPP project) should be
examined for supply to SEZ; though in the opex phase
![Page 32: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 32
GROUP III
‘ML CO’
INDIAN BIDDER
![Page 33: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 33
GROUP III – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
ML Co is an Indian contractor, which will undertake
The supply and laying of the tracks for the metro
The supply of the coaches
Procurement/ Sourcing
The metro coaches would be imported
The metro tracks would be locally procured from own unit in India;
other material would also be locally procured from third parties in
India
![Page 34: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 34
Part 1
Would ML Co be eligible for any deemed export benefits on
manufacture and supply of metro tracks. If so, what are the
benefits and how would they be achieved? Would this change
if the project was funded by specified multilateral agencies?
Would ML Co‟s domestic supplier be eligible for any deemed
export benefits on manufacture and supply of other equipment
for laying tracks. If so, what are the benefits and how would
they be achieved? Would this change if the project was funded
by specified multilateral agencies?
Can any tax efficiencies be achieved on the import of the metro
coaches
GROUP III – DELIVERABLES
![Page 35: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 35
Part 1 (Cont)
Can metro rails be treated as „railways‟ for claiming an
exemption from service tax as a works contract
Can metro rails be treated as „railways‟ for claiming an
exemption from octroi under the Railways Act, 1989
Can any benefits be claimed for an intra-SEZ component of
the metro. If so, how such benefits can be claimed
GROUP III – DELIVERABLES
![Page 36: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 36
Part 2
Analyze and identify risk factors and suggest amendments on
the following aspects of the tender :
Liquidated Damages,
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
Do you foresee any risk of the consortium being taxed as an
Association of Persons
GROUP III – DELIVERABLES
![Page 37: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 37
RESPONSES – Part 1
Would you be eligible for any deemed export benefits on
manufacture and supply of metro tracks. If so, what are
the benefits and how would they be achieved
Deemed export benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy would
not automatically be available to a metro project; however, if
the project was being funded by specified multilateral
agencies, deemed export benefits would flow
Would your domestic supplier be eligible for any deemed
export benefits on manufacture and supply of other
equipment for laying tracks. If so, what are the benefits
and how would they be achieved
Same as above; further, if the project is eligible, then ML Co‟s
supplier would also be eligible for deemed export benefits
provided due certification is issued in their favour
![Page 38: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 38
RESPONSES – Part 1
Can any tax efficiencies be achieved on the import of the
metro coaches
No automatic customs duty exemption could be available
(Delhi metro corridor being the only eligible metro project in
this regard)
Though decisions are available that wagons used for
transporting fuel for power plant would not qualify for project
import status as well, a distinction between power plant and
metro systems could be argued to obtain a project import
status
![Page 39: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 39
RESPONSES – Part 1
Can metro rails be treated as ‘railways’ for claiming
an exemption from service tax as a works contract
Meaning of „Railway‟
Railway is not defined under service tax
Railway has been defined under the Railways Act, 1989 in an inclusive
manner to mean a railway, or any portion of a railway, for the public
carriage of passengers or goods
As per Oxford English Dictionary, it means “a track or set of tracks made
of steel rails along which trains run”; “such a system worked by a single
company”
Thus Metro corridor may qualify as „Railways‟ – exclusion
from levy of service tax under „Works Contract Tax‟
category may be available
![Page 40: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 40
RESPONSES – Part 1
Can metro rails be treated as ‘railways’ for claiming an
exemption from octroi/ cess under the Railways Act, 1989
As seen previously, metro rails could qualify as „railways‟
under the Railways Act, 1989 and inter-alia be eligible for
exemption from octroi to the extent of project in Mumbai and
cess in Navi Mumbai region – this issue could however be
contested
![Page 41: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 41
RESPONSES – Part 1
Can any benefits be claimed for an intra-SEZ component
of the metro? If so, how such benefits can be claimed
SEZ specific benefits may be denied for the intra-SEZ section
of the metro corridor if the same constitutes a public
thoroughfare and is not in connection with the „authorized
operations‟
Creation of a metro entry/ exit points could be covered under
the authorized operations of the SEZ developer; though
substantial documentation challenges are likely to be faced to
get exemption on the SEZ based component of the metro
The above response would change in case the metro corridor
does not form a part of authorized operations of the SEZ
developer
![Page 42: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 42
RESPONSES – Part 1
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Project import based status should be considered
Deemed export benefits could be claimed if the bid is funded
by multilateral agencies
Treatment as railways would save octroi in Mumbai and cess
in Navi Mumbai region
![Page 43: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 43
GROUP IV
‘AA CO’
FOREIGN BIDDER
![Page 44: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 44
GROUP IV – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
AA Co is tax resident in the UK and would supply imported
traffic control and tolling equipment for the road component of
the project that would be imported from the UK
AA Co would also install and commission such equipment.
AA Co has an existing subsidiary in India („AA Co India‟), which
was set up for the purpose of executing onshore work for other
past projects and on account of perceived fiscal efficiencies
Constitution of PE in India is primary concern of AA Co
The equipment required to execute this Project has to be
imported from AA Co or its group companies around the world;
you have the option to route such supply of equipment for the
Project through AA Co India as well
![Page 45: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 45
Software is a crucial component of the installation and
commissioning process for the equipment; the customized
software is developed by AA Co and can be supplied through
variable means (including a direct download). Ownership of the
software would vest in MMRDA
The testing, installation and commissioning of the traffic control
and management, and tolling equipment would be done by AA
Co India; AA Co India could work in the role of the sub-
contractor or the main contractor/ consortium partner
AA Co/ AA Co India would not be responsible for setting up the
civil works for the toll plazas
Payments will be separately made by MMRDA to AA Co/ AA
Co India for completion of work as per the specified schedule
GROUP IV – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
![Page 46: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 46
Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE perspective,
depending on whether the AA Co or AA Co India is the
consortium partner
How can you minimize the PE exposure, if any
What are the indirect tax implications between AA Co/ AA Co
India and MMRDA on the above transaction
GROUP IV - DELIVERABLES
![Page 47: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 47
Part 2
Analyze and suggest appropriate deviations in the following
clauses:
Liquidated Damages,
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Governing law and choice of forum
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
GROUP IV - DELIVERABLES
![Page 48: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 48
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the AA Co or AA Co
India is the consortium partner
The income on offshore supply shall not be liable to tax in
India, subject to the satisfaction of the following two conditions:
If the ownership of the equipments is transferred outside India/
high seas; and
The payment is made to AA Co outside India in foreign currency
This view has been supported by various judicial precedents
(IHI ltd‟s case, Hyundai Heavy Industry‟s case and Roxon‟s
case)………..
![Page 49: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 49
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the AA Co or AA
Co India is the consortium partner
Supply of software The issue relating to characterisation of software income is far from
settled.
There are various judgements at ITAT level which support the view that
the transfer of software is like a transfer of goods, however, in a recent
ruling of Delhi tribunal in case of Microsoft Corporation it was held that
the use of software shall be classified as „royalty‟
Two recent Mumbai Bench of ITAT have rendered favourable rulings on
taxability of supply of off-the-shelf software – Reliance Comm case; and
Tata Communication Ltd
![Page 50: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 50
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are your income tax implications from a PE
perspective, depending on whether the AA Co or AA
Co India is the consortium partner
Supply of software (contd) In the present case, the software is a highly customised software; also,
the copyright in the software shall be owned by Project Owner and not
the supplier
Given the fact pattern, consideration for customised software is likely to
be characterised as „fee for included service‟ or „royalty‟
![Page 51: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 51
RESPONSES – Part 1
How can you minimize the PE exposure, if any
In order to minimise any risk of income attribution, separate
contracts should be entered for offshore supply of equipments
(ie the work to be performed by AA Co) and the onshore
installation and commissioning (ie the work to be performed by
AA Co India).
![Page 52: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 52
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between AA Co/
AA Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction ?
Import and sale of equipment
Importation of equipment liable to customs duty; concessional duty under
the Project Import Scheme could be available
Valuation from a customs perspective could be a larger concern if AA Co/
AA Co India imports equipment into India; given this, a direct supply of
equipment to MMRDA can be considered (which would limit VAT outgo as
well), preferably on a DDU (INCOTERMS) basis
Sale liable to applicable VAT/CST unless SICOI benefits are structured
Key ingredients of SICOI seen earlier
![Page 53: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 53
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between AA Co/ AA
Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction ?
Import and supply of software
Electronic import of (operational) software shall not trigger customs duty
implications; however, service tax would be payable on development and
implementation of (operational) software; though VAT should not apply
since a „work for hire‟
Physical import of (operational) software may trigger customs duty
implications as it is not a shrink-wrap software meant for re-sale; service
tax and VAT implications would also be same as above
![Page 54: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 54
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the indirect tax implications between AA Co/
AA Co India and MMRDA on the above transaction ?
Installation and commissioning services
Activity is liable to service tax
If AA Co contractually renders these services, its operations should
constitute a business establishment from which services are rendered . In
such case, AA Co will be liable to pay tax
In case AA Co India acts as a sub-contractor to AA Co (non-resident
entity), service tax would be payable as AA Co India‟s service will not
qualify as an export. However, since AA Co will operate in India, credit
should be available based on judicial rulings
![Page 55: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 55
RESPONSES – Part 2
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Supply of equipment directly from AA Co in UK
Installation and commissioning services should be undertaken
by AA Co India; AA Co should (if required) provide support to
AA Co India
Segregation of scope of work between AA Co and AA Co
India should be reviewed
![Page 56: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 56
GROUP V
‘TT CO’
INDIAN BIDDER
![Page 57: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 57
TT Co is the domestic contractor engaged in construction
activities
TT Co is interested in constructing the main bridge and road,
metro station and malls thereupon (but excluding laying of the
metro lines) with technical support, prior experience and
expertise on sea bed constructions from CC Co
Steel and cement for the construction of the Project would be
sourced from TT Co‟s own manufacturing units within and
outside Maharashtra.
In case of shortages, it would procure steel and cement from
third parties within and outside Maharashtra,
All other materials would be procured from third parties
GROUP V – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
![Page 58: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 58
TT Co would also undertake the civil works for the metro
stations and commercially exploitable areas of such shopping
centers as a part of its obligations
GROUP V – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
![Page 59: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 59
Part 1
What would be the applicability of VAT on the construction
project. Which scheme for paying works contracts would be
most streamlined, depending on the assumptions that materials
(cement & steel & other materials) would be 60% of the TT
Co‟s project costs
Based on the above assumption, is it optimal to procure the
steel and cement from within or outside Maharashtra (whether
manufactured by TT Co or third party)
What other indirect tax related benefits can be claimed on the
supply of steel and cement
GROUP V - DELIVERABLES
![Page 60: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 60
Part 1 (Contd)
Would your conclusion change (on the assumption that you
can obtain a pre-fabrication technology and the steel and
cement are being imported?
Would the component of metro station exploited commercially
(shopping centre etc) be entitled for service tax exemption?
GROUP V - DELIVERABLES
![Page 61: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 61
Part 2
Analyze and identify risk factors and suggest amendments on
the following aspects of the tender :
Liquidated Damages,
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Governing law and choice of forum
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
GROUP V - DELIVERABLES
![Page 62: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 62
RESPONSES – Part 1
What would the applicability of VAT on the construction
project?
The construction project would be liable to VAT as a works
contract
Following option of discharging VAT liability may be available
to TT Co
Payment of tax at merits rates on value of supplies
Composition of taxes at 5% of the contract value
Payment of tax at merit rates on supplies portion arrived at by
applying an ad-hoc deduction of 30 percent
![Page 63: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 63
RESPONSES – Part 1
Alternative schemes for VAT payment – streamlined option?
Financial assumptions
Total contract price – INR 100 mn (with 10% on revenue as profit margin)
Cost of purchase of cement (taxable @ 5%) – INR 18 mn
Cost of purchase of steel (taxable @ 4%) – INR 18 mn
Cost of other purchases (taxable @ 12.5%) – INR 18 mn
VAT @ merits rates will be
INR 4.3 mn (20 X 5% +
20 X 4% + 20 X 12.5%)
All VAT purchases
shall be Creditable
All (2%) CST purchases
shall be non creditable
VAT under composition scheme
will be INR 5 mn (100 X 5%)
All VAT purchases shall be creditable
for tax paid in excess of 4%
All (2%) CST purchases
shall be non creditable
VAT under ad-hoc deduction
scheme will be INR 4.73 mn
(20 X 5% + 20 X 4% + 20 X 12.5%)
All VAT purchases shall be
creditable
All (2%) CST purchases
shall be non creditable
![Page 64: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 64
RESPONSES – Part 1
Based on the above assumption, is it optimal to procure
the steel and cement from within or outside Maharashtra
(whether manufactured by TT Co or third party)
Ideal sourcing pattern has been indicated below
Scheme for payment of
output VAT
Preferable sourcing
pattern for materials
Merit Rates Intra-state
Composition Inter-state
Ad-hoc deduction Intra-state
![Page 65: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 65
RESPONSES – Part 1
What indirect tax related benefits can be claimed on the supply of steel and cement (manufactured by TT Co or sourced from third parties)
Our analysis indicated that steel and cement for infrastructure project (such as bridges, railways, etc) should not be entitled to any additional benefit such as deemed export as the supplies would not constitute use in manufacture
The above should not alter irrespective whether the materials are supplied by TT Co upon manufacture or sourced from third parties
However, for pre-fabricated project structures (for bridges, etc) there is a possibility the eligibility for deemed export benefits could be examined if substantial part of steel and cement is being imported to create pre-fabricated structures to economize on customs duties
![Page 66: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 66
RESPONSES – Part 1
Would the component of metro station exploited
commercially (shopping centre etc) be entitled for service
tax exemption?
Qualification of such scope of work for exclusion from
applicability of service tax could be argued dependent upon
project specification and underlying documentation
![Page 67: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 67
RESPONSES – Part 2
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Sourcing pattern to be reviewed to determine the most
efficient option of paying VAT on works contract
If imported materials are being used for creating pre-
fabricated structures, obtaining deemed export benefits to limit
basic customs duty costs is a possibility
![Page 68: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 68
GROUP VI
‘CC CO’
FOREIGN BIDDER
![Page 69: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 69
GROUP VI – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
CC Co is a foreign contractor and Korean tax resident
CC Co will be responsible for undertaking the pre-construction
studies
CC Co is also responsible for providing the technical support to
TT Co for construction of the main bridge and the road thereon
For this purpose CC Co shall leverage upon its expertise and prior
experience in similar projects
It will also import and operate the required specialist equipment
for the project (for use in construction process)
CC Co would not undertake to supply any materials to project
![Page 70: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 70
GROUP VI – FACTUAL BACKGROUND
CC Co would be supervising the initial location analysis for the
Project as well as supervise, monitor and support the
construction process throughout the execution of the Project
through its own employees
CC Co would operate its office premises in India made
available by MMRDA to manage all services being rendered
![Page 71: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 71
GROUP VI - DELIVERABLES
Part 1
What are the Permanent Establishment related risks arising from CC Co‟s operations? Can such risks be mitigated?
If the Permanent Establishment risk is imminent, what planning, implementation and compliance shall be required to optimise tax outcomes for the PE? What indirect taxes would apply to fees earned by CC Co
What indirect taxes would apply to fees earned by CC Co?
Will CC Co be liable to pay service tax for its activities in India, or would the reverse charge mechanism apply?
Would specific payments made by MMRDA (as per agreed
schedule) on specialist equipment hired by CC Co result in any
VAT exposures as a lease (when CC Co is the lessor)? If so,
how can such exposures be limited?
![Page 72: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 72
Part 1 (Contd)
Would customs duty apply to specialist equipment hired by CC
Co. Are there any options to limit the customs duty impact
Part 2
Analyze and identify risk factors and suggest amendments on
the following aspects of the tender :
Liquidated Damages,
Transfer of property,
Arbitration,
Assignment,
Joint and several liability,
Change in law, including introduction of GST during the project
execution
GROUP VI - DELIVERABLES
![Page 73: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 73
Part 2 (Cont)
Does there exist any risk/ exposure of the consortium being
taxed as an Association of Persons
GROUP VI - DELIVERABLES
![Page 74: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 74
RESPONSES – Part 1
What are the Permanent Establishment related risks that you foresee from your operations. Can such risks be mitigated
CC Co would be supervising, monitoring and supporting the construction process throughout the execution of the Project (ie through entire period of 48 months)
The presence of CC Co employees in India to undertake the aforestated scope of work is likely to create a Supervisory PE for CC Co in India.
According to Article 5 of the India-Korea Double taxation Avoidance Agreement, the term PE encompasses within its ambit a building site, a construction, assembly or installation project or supervisory activitieswhere such site, project or activities continue for a period of more than
nine months.
Therefore, in the instant case the income of CC Co shall be taxable in India on a net basis at 42.23 percent.
![Page 75: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 75
RESPONSES – Part 1
If the Permanent Establishment risk is imminent, how can
such risks be ring fenced
CC Co should set up a local presence in India to optimise the
PE tax implications.
CC Co shall have the following macro-level options
Setting up a project office
Floating a wholly owned subsidiary for executing the local scope
![Page 76: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 76
RESPONSES – Part 1
What indirect taxes would apply to fees earned by CC Co
The fee earned by CC Co for pre-construction studies as well
as supervision service component shall be liable to service
tax; however, for aiding the construction process through
operation of specialized equipment, there is an argument that
the same could qualify as „commercial construction service‟ (ie
as a pure service) and therefore, eligible for exclusion from
the service tax purview
Import of specialist equipment would be exempt from customs
duty (for equipment covered by serial # 230 read with list 18 of
the Notification 21/2002); other equipment would attract duties
![Page 77: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 77
RESPONSES – Part 1
Will CC Co be liable to pay service tax for its activities in
India, or would the reverse charge mechanism apply
As indicated, MMRDA would provide CC Co office space at
the project site from where CC Co would undertake its
activities in India/ execute the scope of work in relation to the
project
In attendant facts, CC Co shall establish its business in India and
will also have a place of business (though not permanent);
therefore, such arrangement should not fall within the scope of
provisions contained at Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994
read with relevant rules in this regard
Applicable service tax on fee earned by CC Co shall therefore
be payable by CC Co and the reverse charge mechanism
would not apply
![Page 78: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 78
RESPONSES – Part 1
Would specific payments made by MMRDA (as per
schedule) on specialist equipment hired result in any VAT
exposures as a lease. If so, how can such exposures be
limited
VAT implications should not be triggered on hire charges
collected by CC Co since in attendant facts of the case CC Co
retains the control and possession over the specialist
equipment in favour of any other person/ party
However, relevant contractual terms in this regard should be
phrased carefully to clearly reflect that the intention of parties
is not to „transfer the right to use goods‟ as has been
interpreted by courts on several occassions
![Page 79: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 79
RESPONSES – Part 1
Would customs duty apply to specialist equipment hired
by CC Co? Are there any options to limit the customs duty
impact
As discussed earlier, the specialist equipment would be
subjected to customs duty upon importation in India unless
covered by the exemption notification
Following schemes could also be explored to limit the duty
impact
Project Import scheme
Duty Drawback scheme (assuming the specialist equipment
would be re-exported, after use in India, within 18 months of
importation thereof)
![Page 80: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 80
RESPONSES – Part 1
Suggestions for tax efficiencies
Contractual structuring to treat activity as construction
services can be considered for service tax exemption
Delivery schedules of equipment should be monitored to
appropriately avail drawback
![Page 81: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 81
ANNEXURE –
RESPONSES TO
PART 2
![Page 82: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 82
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations
Liquidated damages (Indian Member/Foreign Member)
Rs. 10,000,000,000 per day of delay – unreasonable and not genuine pre-
estimate of loss. Suggest reducing to 0.5% or 1.0% of Contract Price
Performance liquidated damages not clear and unambiguous. Suggest
that specific rates for performance liquidated damages should be
included.
No cap on liquidated damages and this would amount to a penalty.
Suggest cap on delay liquidated damages, cap on performance liquidated
damages and overall cap on liquidated damages. Only when these caps
are exhausted and not before, Owner may have a right to terminate
Contract.
-
-
![Page 83: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 83
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations
Transfer of Property: Indian Member
Suggest transfer of title and ownership to plant and equipment on later of:
(i) delivery; and (ii) receipt of relevant milestone payment.
Tender terms silent on relationship between: substantial completion;
taking over; defects liability period and issuance of final completion
certificate. Suggest transfer of risk of loss to Authority on earlier of: (i)
actual taking over of plant and equipment; and (ii) issuance of taking over
certificate.
Transfer of Property: Foreign Member
Subject to tax considerations, suggest transfer of title and ownership to
plant and equipment on later of: (i) delivery; and (ii) receipt of relevant
milestone payment.
Re risk transfer: same suggestion as above.
-
![Page 84: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 84
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations (Cont)
Arbitration: Indian Member
Suggest institutional arbitration (LCIA/ICDR Rules)
Arbitration: Foreign Member
Suggest institutional arbitration (SIAC/HIAC Rules)
Suggest seat of arbitration: Singapore/Hong Kong
Suggest law governing arbitration agreement: Singapore/Hong Kong law
Suggest exclusion of applicability of Part I of the Indian Arbitration &
Conciliation Act, 1996. Only Section 9 (interim relief by Indian courts)
should continue to apply
![Page 85: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 85
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations (Cont)
Assignment (Indian Member/Foreign Member)
Suggest that assignment by Authority should be subject to prior written
consent of Contractor. Contractor should be satisfied that Assignee has
ability to meet payment obligations and meet Authority‟s obligations under
Contract, before grant of consent. Sole exception: assignment of Contract
in favour of Authority‟s lenders.
Suggest that Contractor should be entitled to assign benefits of Contract
to any third party, including its lenders.
Suggest that Contractor should have the freedom to sub-contract its
obligations under Contract to third parties, without consent of Authority.
Exception may be made in relation to material sub-contracts having a
value above a specified threshold, in relation to which Authority approval
may be required.
![Page 86: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 86
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations (Cont)
Joint and Several Liability (Indian Member/Foreign Member)
Joint and several liability could result in each Member‟s liability under the
Contract exceeding it‟s portion of the Contract Price. Further, joint and
several liability could contribute to the constitution of an AOP.
The first strategy could be to negotiate with the Authority to: (i) clearly
define each Member‟s scope of work; (ii) appoint Lead Member as project
manager; (iii) undertake to cooperate and coordinate execution of works,
without taking liability for any other Member‟s scope of work; and (iv) limit
each Member‟s liability to it‟s portion of Contract price.
If Authority does not agree to suggestions above, all Members should
enter into an inter se consortium agreement: (i) allocating responsibilities
and liabilities incurred pursuant to the Contract; (ii) agreeing to a payment
mechanism to ensure timely payments; and (iii) stipulating inter-se
indemnities to cover risk of “joint and several liability”.
![Page 87: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 87
RESPONSES – Part 2
Contractual deviations (Cont)
Governing Law and Choice of Forum: Indian Member
Indian law should be acceptable.
Suggest that courts of Mumbai will have exclusive jurisdiction, as assets
of Authority are in Bombay.
Governing Law and Choice of Forum: Foreign Member
Suggest changing governing law to law of neutral jurisdiction that provides
certainty to interpretation of contracts, e.g., English law.
Suggest excluding the conflict of law rules, if English law is chosen.
Suggest that courts of Mumbai will have exclusive jurisdiction, as assets
of Authority are in Bombay.
Suggest including clause to effect that principle of “forum non conveniens”
will have no application to disputes arising under Contract.
![Page 88: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 88
RESPONSES – Part 2
Change in Law
Risk factors/ Inherent complications
Change in taxes limited to introduction of new or deletion of existing taxes;
impact of change in rates has been specifically excluded
No obligation has been cast on the contractor to opt for tax saving or
economizing opportunity resulting due to change in taxes (though relevant
from MMRDA’s perspective)
Focus on output taxes rather than the net transaction cost; re-
imbursement of outgo towards incremental taxes could be lowered due to
input tax credits, which has not considered
No threshold prescribed
No prescription on alternate dispute resolution mechanism
No discussion on manner of settlement of impact of change in taxes,
whether lump sum or otherwise
![Page 89: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 89
RESPONSES – Part 2
Change in Law
Suggested changes
Extending the scope of the clause on „change in law‟ to change in tax
rates also
No obligation has been cast on the contractor to opt for tax saving or
economizing opportunity resulting due to change in taxes
Prescribing methodology to compute financial impact of change in taxes
and duties such that effective change in tax cost to be borne by the
contractor could be arrived at
Setting a mutually agreed threshold can offer a savings of time and effort
by imputing the need to undertake financial analysis in case of minor
changes in law
A dispute resolution mechanism should be prescribed (through a forum of
subject matter experts)
![Page 90: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 90
RESPONSES – Part 2
Change in Law
Suggested changes
The methodology for adjustment of financial impact should be prescribed;
preferred manner could be
One time lump sum adjustment linked with the stage of project completion
Adjustment to contract price for balance period as per project completion/
payment schedule
![Page 91: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 91
RESPONSES – Part 2
Risk of consortium being taxed as an ‘AOP’
Yes, there is an exposure of the consortium being classified
as AOP. There are certain clauses in the bid document which
give rise to this risk:
Like joint and several responsibility for completion of the project;
Common flow of revenue;
Bidder shall indemnify the project owner for any losses, ie the bidder
would have to indemnify the project owner even in case of any default
from any of the consortium members
In case, the consortium is taxed like an AOP; then the same
shall be taxed like a separate legal entity. The AOP would be
taxed at the maximum marginal rate (42.23 percent) on a net
basis, due to presence of a foreign service provider. Further,
it shall lead to the taxation of offshore supplies as well
![Page 92: BMR Case Study](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042623/551134d44a7959d2028b45be/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
All
rig
hts
reserv
ed
Case Study| 92C h a l l e n g e U s