[email protected] chabotengr-calpolyslo_systemengr_0505.ppt 1 bruce mayer, pe calpoly slo...

54
[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt 1 Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481 Bruce Mayer, PE Licensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer [email protected] Chabot Engineering Degrees, PEs, and Degrees, PEs, and System Engineering System Engineering

Upload: sophie-carson

Post on 23-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt1

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Bruce Mayer, PELicensed Electrical & Mechanical Engineer

[email protected]

Chabot Engineering

Degrees, PEs, Degrees, PEs, andand

System System EngineeringEngineering

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt2

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

OutlineOutline

Speaker Bio Which Degree; BS, MS, PhD, PE? Systems Engineering

• What is it?– The Defining Attributes

– How it Differs From CE, ChemE, EE, MatE, ME, etc.

• Why is it needed?– i.e., What is the Value

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt3

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Outline cont.1Outline cont.1• How Do I Prepare for Systems Engineering?

– Communication

– Leadership

Professional Engineering (PE) License• WHAT is it?

• HOW do I earn it?– Application PreReq & Process

– Effort Level

• WHY SHOULD I Earn it?– CE’s vs. Everyone Else

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt4

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Outline cont.2Outline cont.2

LeaderShip• A Critical Engineering Skill

College/University Employment Recruiting• What Employers are looking for

– One Recruiter’s Perspective

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt5

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-1B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-1 MS Electrical

Engineering• Stanford, 1991

MS Mechanical Engineering• Stanford, 1983

BS Mechanical Engineering• UCBerkeley, 1978

AS Engineering• Cabrillo College,

1976

Professional Engineering License • Electrical, 2002

• Mechanical, 1982

CA Community College Teaching Credential, 1984

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt6

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-2B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-2 Engineering Honor

Societies• Tau Beta Pi ()

– The All-Engineering Equivalent of

• Pi Tau Sigma ()– Mechanical Engrng

Professional Associations• Current Member

– ASME

– IEEE

• Past Member– ASHRAE

– NSPE

– SID

– ACM

Patents• 6,846,149 (2005)

• 6,610,150 (2003)

• 6,544,345 (2003)

• 5,122,391 (1992)

• U.S. Patent App 20040231588

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt7

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-3B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-3 Publications

• Journal of Vac. Sci and Tech (2001)

• Electrochemical Soc. Proceedings (1997)

• IEEE Trans. Semi. Manufacturing (1996)

• Thin Solid Films (Elsevier – 1992)

• LBL Report EEB-Env-79-2 (1979)

Professional History• Olympus-ITA (2000

→ 2003)– Managing Director,

System Design & Integration Engineering

• Watkins-Johnson Co. (1979 → 2000)– Managing Director,

System Design & Integration Engineering

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt8

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-4B. Mayer Prof/Academic Bio-4 Professional History

• Watkins-Johnson Co.– Senior

Electrical/Process/Mechanical Design Engineer

– Flat Panel Deposition Equipment/Process Engineering Manager

– APCVD System Design Engineer

– Firing Furnace Mechanical DesignEngineer

• Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory– Research Assistant,

Bldg Envelopes Grp

Industry Awards• Semiconductor

International Magazine 1994 BEST PRODUCT Award,WJ-1000APCVD Sys.

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt9

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Which Degree for Me?Which Degree for Me?

A New-Grad Baccalaureate Engineer Must Make a Choice• Go To GRADUATE

SCHOOL IMMEDIATELY– If so, then MS or PhD?

• Enter the PRACTICE of Engineering– Go to Graduate School LATER?

– Limitations of BS-Only?

American Council on Education Committee on Academic Customs &

Ceremonies - Color Guidelines Arts, Letters & Humanties White Education Light Blue Engineering Orange Law Purple Medicine Green Philosophy Dark Blue Science Golden Yellow Business Drab (Brown)

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt10

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

BS-Degree → Pros & ConsBS-Degree → Pros & Cons Proponencies

• Quickest Path to Making a Living

• Largest Absolute Number of Professional Opportunities– Best Selection of

COMPANY and LOCATION

Contraries• Not Sufficient

Qualifications for Some Positions

• Statistically the Lowest Compensation

• Lowest on the Prestige Ladder– But Still MUCH better

than any OTHER Type of BS degree

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt11

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Stanford University Avg Starting Salaries • 2003-2004

102.1

75.0

52.7

72.5

63.3

52.6

0 20 40 60 80 100

Ph

DM

SB

SD

egre

e E

arn

ed

Starting Salary ($k)

Mechanical Engineering

Electrical Engineering

file = Salary-Survey-2004_0503.xls

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt12

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

EE Times Experienced-Worker Salary Survey • 2003

112.1

97.4

96.6

91.9

83.4

87.8

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

PhD

MB

AM

SE

EM

SC

SB

SE

EB

SC

S

Dis

cip

lin

e &

Deg

ree

Average Salary ($k/yr)file = Salary-Survey-2004_0503.xls

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt13

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

MS-Degree → Pros & ConsMS-Degree → Pros & Cons Proponencies

• Only 1-1.5 Years After BS Degree

• Qualified for Some Research Positions

• Not “Over Qualified” for Most BS Positions– Still have Large

Selection of Employers & Locations

Contraries• Not Sufficient

Qualifications for Pure Research Positions

• Extra Work without earning a Title– You’re Still a “Mr.” or

a “Ms.”

• Only about 25% up the Prestige Ladder

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt14

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PhD-Degree → Pros & ConsPhD-Degree → Pros & Cons Proponencies

• Qualified for the Highest Positions

• The Chance to Do ORIGINAL Research

• Statistically Best Compensation

• Top of the Prestige Ladder– Instant Credibility

Contraries• May be Considered

“Over Qualified” for Many Positions– Severely Contracts

the Employer & Location Sets

• 3-4 YEARS of INTENSE Academic Training after the BS– No Salary, Large

Student Loans

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt15

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Caveat EmptorCaveat Emptor

Success in the Private Sector is NOT Strictly Tied to Academic Achievement

These People Hold Advanced Degrees• Jack Welch, CEO

General Electric– Ph.D. ChemE

University of Illinois

• Andy Grove, CEO Intel Corp.– Ph.D., ChemE

UCBerkeley

These People Do NOT• Bill Gates, Chairman

MicroSoft

• Michael Dell, Chairman Dell Computer

• Larry Ellison, CEO ORACLE Corp

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt16

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SystemsSystemsEngineeringEngineeringC

on

cept D

rawin

g fo

rC

on

cept D

rawin

g fo

rIC

Man

uf. M

achin

e To

ol

IC M

anu

f. Mach

ine T

oo

l

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt17

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Systems EngineeringSystems Engineering

What is it? → Short Answer• Understand the Needs of the CUSTOMER

• To Design the ARCHITECTURE of a MULTI-ELEMENT SYSTEM (Product and/or Service)

• Then LEAD Product DESIGN, PROTOTYPING, TESTING, and INTRODUCTION

• Lead by Determining WHO will do WHAT by WHEN and for HOW MUCH-$

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt18

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

System Architecture – WJ2000ASystem Architecture – WJ2000A

FSMenagh

L. Harla

moff

HSPaek

B. Mayer

B. Mayer(acting as of 08Nov)

AKMcGrogan

CEE

rickson

R. Reghitto

MSWalton

MSW

alto

nRSMurphy

DMDobkinZ. Yuan

B. Mayer

CalPoly-SLOAlum

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt19

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

What IS a System?What IS a System? A system is a construct or collection of DIFFERENT

ELEMENTS that TOGETHER produce results NOT OBTAINABLE by the ELEMENTS ALONE.

The elements, or parts, can include PEOPLE, HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, FACILITIES, POLICIES, and DOCUMENTS

The RESULTS include SYSTEM Level qualities, Properties, Characteristics, Functions, Behavior and PERFORMANCE.

The VALUE ADDED by the system as a whole, beyond that contributed independently by the parts, is primarily CREATED by the RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE PARTS; that is, how they are interconnected

Courtesy of the International Council on Systems Engineering

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt20

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

WHY Systems Engineering?WHY Systems Engineering?

Modern Heavily-Engineered Products are Highly INTERDISCIPLINARY

UNDERSTANDING and DESIGN of Complex-Component INTERACTION is AS IMPORTANT as the Components themselves

SOMEONE has to have a View of the Product From the CUSTOMER/USER Perspective

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt21

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SysEngr CharacteristicsSysEngr Characteristics

A TRUE Technical Position• NOT a “Program MANAGER”

Some Synonyms• Project Engineer

• System Architect (my Favorite)

• Product Engineer

The Primary TECHNICAL Contact for• Customers

• Company Upper-Management

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt22

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

System Performance System Performance Design RulesDesign Rules

USERS of Heavily Engineered systems generally do not specify the detailed performance requirements for the Hardware & Software that comprise the system. Instead the CUSTOMER (often another Engineer) specifies PERFORMANCE criteria such as ThruPut, OutPut Quality, DownTime, etc.

System Engineers translate the CUSTOMER PERFORMANCE Requirements into internal HW/SW Design SPECIFICATIONS.

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt23

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Systems Engineering OwnsSystems Engineering Owns

System Architecture• Overall Function of the

System at a Conceptual Level

• Customer Interface Documents– Facility/Installation Diagram(s)

– Facility/Host Communication interface

The System Specification that defines• System & Subsystem Performance

Life Cycle Analysis if Needed

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt24

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Systems Engineering Owns Systems Engineering Owns cont.-1cont.-1

The System Specification that defines System & Subsystem Compliance to industry standards and regulations• System Operation (a.k.a. Theory of

Operation)

• Subsystem Interconnects (System integration)

The Project Schedule (How Long?) The Project Budget (How Much?)

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt25

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Systems Engineering Owns Systems Engineering Owns cont.-2cont.-2

The Project Implementation Team (Who?)• Elements from: Mechanical/Electrical Design,

Process, Software, Manuf., etc.

Setting Project Priorities (What Next?) Technical Communication to the “Outside

World” (Product Education)• Internal Sales & Marketing

• Operations (Manuf, Training, Service)

• Customers Directly When Needed

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt26

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SysEngr owns the Product SpecSysEngr owns the Product Spec

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt27

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SysEngr – Technical SideSysEngr – Technical Side

The INCOSE “SIMILAR”SIMILAR” Model

SState the problem IInvestigate

alternatives MModel the system

IIntegrate LLaunch the system, AAssess performance RRe-evaluate

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt28

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

APNext™ Generation

ThruPut EnhancementThruPut EnhancementSystem Architecture System Architecture

AnalysisAnalysisBruce Mayer, PE

Product Development Team [email protected] • 14Apr2000

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt29

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Architectural Analysis: Define TermsArchitectural Analysis: Define Terms

General Case APNext™ Chamber• m = number of MultiBlok™ Injectors (2 in this example)

• n = number gas outlets in a MultiBlok™ Injector (3 in this case)

• k = number of heated chucks (2 in this example)

• j = number of deposition/coating passes (6 in this example)

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt30

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Define of Stroke-Length Terms Define of Stroke-Length Terms

In Most Subsequent Analyses• Lg = 25 mm

• Lss = 55 mm

• P = 60 mm

• Lcc = 518 mm (300mm)

• W = 28 mm

• Lox = 9mm

• Lmb = 50 mm

• Lend = 100 mm

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt31

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

The Distance EquationsThe Distance Equations

oxccmbssip L2WL)1k(L)1m(P1nmL)1m(2L

oxccmbssgsp L2WL)1k(L)1m(2P1nm2L)1m4(LL

oxccmbssgul L2WL)1k(L)1m(P1nmL)1m2(LL

endulspch L2LLL

ipultot L)j2(L2L

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt32

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Velocity & Gas-On Time EqnsVelocity & Gas-On Time Eqns

Term definitions• d = film depth (0.8 µm = 8000 Å)

• j = number of passes under the injectors (14)

• m = number of MulitBlok™ Injectors (2)

• n = number of MultiBlok™ Outlets (2)

• Adm= Area under Static Print Dep Mound (1595 Å-mm/s)

• Ltot = Total Translate Path-Length

Adm

d

nmjAv dm

vLt tot

0

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt33

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

APNext™ Advanced Architecture for 300mm/5kÅ-BPSG • Apr00

25.40

18.29

15.79

15.94

17.27

11.35

10.16

10.19

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

2@

3X

/2c

hk

2@

3X

/1c

hk

1@

3X

/1c

hk

Mil

lSy

s3

(20

0m

m)

Sy

ste

m D

es

cri

pti

on

300mm Wafer ThruPut (wph)

Conservative

Optimistic

file = ThruPut_Calc.xls

Key Model Parameters (Cons/Opt)• Adm = 4663/5362 Å-mm/s• Heat/Cool/Handling OH = 100/60 s/Dep-Cycle • Clean Efficiency = 2222/2222 scc-R/litre-NF3• Clean Pre & Post Pumping & Venting = 4.8/3 min • 1 Astron per MultiBlok• Wfrs Between Cln = 5/15 (< 2.5/7.5 µm)• Lch assumes moveable (up/dwn) ceiling over the wafer load position

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt34

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SysEngr Special SkillsSysEngr Special Skills

MUST Be Comfortable In Front of the CUSTOMER• When the Sales Engineers Exhaust Their

Technical Expertise the SysEngr Takes Over to Explain the Product

Effective Communicator• Become a POLISHED and

PROFESSIONAL Presenter

• Write CLEARLY and CONCISELY– Write a LOT

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt35

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SysEngr Special SkillsSysEngr Special Skills

Accurate Task SCHEDULER• Aim for Massive PARALLELISM

– Recognize DEPENDENCIES & SEQUENCES

• Extra Effort to NOT to MISS Anything

Accurate L&M $-Cost ESTIMATOR• SysEngr OWES Company Management

REALISTIC $-Cost Estimates– Serves as Input to the Business-Required

Return on Investment (RoI) Decisions

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt36

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Overall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE ScheduleOverall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE ScheduleID Task Name Duration Start Finish

1 Preliminary Review & Remediation 1.6 wks Tue 8/28/01 Thu 9/6/01

2 Plan Preliminary Review at OTA 1 day Tue 8/28/01 Tue 8/28/01

3 Conduct Review of OTA-3100 1 day Tue 9/4/01 Tue 9/4/01

4 Analyze GS3 Report, Inform FIS Team 1 day Wed 9/5/01 Wed 9/5/01

5 Receive Report, Plan Design Changes 1 day Thu 9/6/01 Thu 9/6/01

6 PreLim Review Design Changes 2.2 wks Fri 9/7/01 Thu 9/20/01

7 Seismic Measurements 1 day Fri 9/7/01 Fri 9/7/01

8 Hazard Labeling Plan 5 days Fri 9/7/01 Tue 9/11/01

9 Electrical Wiring 3 days Fri 9/7/01 Tue 9/11/01

10 Electrical Components 11 days Fri 9/7/01 Thu 9/20/01

11 EMO/EPO Controls 11 days Fri 9/7/01 Thu 9/20/01

12 Instruction Manuals 11 days Fri 9/7/01 Thu 9/20/01

13 Plan Full S2/S8/CE Review In Tatsuno 4 wks Fri 9/7/01 Wed 10/3/01

14 Determine 3x00 Unit for Testing 3 days Fri 9/7/01 Tue 9/11/01

15 Determine Target Date for Test-Start 3 days Fri 9/7/01 Tue 9/11/01

16 Obtain Quotation For GS3 Services 11 days Fri 9/7/01 Mon 9/17/01

17 Tentatively Schedule GS3 Services 11 days Wed 9/12/01 Sat 9/22/01

18 Write Req for GS3 Services (Firm Schedule) 11 days Sun 9/23/01 Wed 10/3/01

19 Make Travel Arrangements 1 day Fri 9/7/01 Fri 9/7/01

20 Pre-Review/Test Preparation 0.6 wks Thu 10/4/01 Mon 10/8/01

21 Electrical Schematics (>24 V) 3 days Thu 10/4/01 Mon 10/8/01

22 Plumbing Schematics 1 day Thu 10/4/01 Thu 10/4/01

23 List NRTL Status of Safety Critical Components 3 days Thu 10/4/01 Mon 10/8/01

24 Instruction/Operation Manuals 1 day Thu 10/4/01 Thu 10/4/01

25 SubSystem S2/S8/CE Reports 0.2 wks Fri 10/5/01 Sat 10/6/01

26 TDK TAS-300 FOUP LoadPort 1 day Fri 10/5/01 Fri 10/5/01

27 Rorze 700 Series Robot-Arm 2 days Fri 10/5/01 Sat 10/6/01

Done BMayer

Done BMayer,GS3

Done BMayer

Done YKitahara

BMayer

Done BMayer

BMayer

YKitahara

YKitahara

YKitahara

HHoshino

OTA-3200? YKitahara

YKitahara

BMayer

BMayer

BMayer

BMayer,GS3

Complete 4Sep01 YKitahara

YKitahara

YKitahara

BMayer

BMayer

BMayer

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun JulQtr 3, 2001 Qtr 4, 2001 Qtr 1, 2002 Qtr 2, 2002 Qtr 3, 2002

Ref. BMayer file 3100_S2S8CE_0109.mpp

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt37

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Overall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE Schedule Overall/LongTerm 3x00 S2/S8/CE Schedule ID Task Name Duration Start Finish

28 Confirm Design Engineer Availability 0.2 wks Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01

29 Electrical/Controls Engineer 1 day Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01

30 Mechanical/Plumbing Engineer 1 day Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01

31 Mechanical/Automation Engineer 1 day Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01

32 System Engineer 1 day Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01

33 Travel To Japan 0.6 wks Sat 12/8/01 Mon 12/10/01

34 Air Travel to Narita/Tokyo 2 days Sat 12/8/01 Sun 12/9/01

35 Ground Travel Tokyo=>Tatsuno 1 day Mon 12/10/01 Mon 12/10/01

36 Full S2/S8/CE Testing at FIS in Tatsuno 1.9 wks Tue 12/11/01 Fri 12/21/01

37 S2/S8 Review & Testing 0.7 wks Tue 12/11/01 Fri 12/14/01

38 Intro, Task/Plan Review 0.5 days Tue 12/11/01 Tue 12/11/01

39 Testing, Document-Review 2.5 days Tue 12/11/01 Thu 12/13/01

40 Summary & Action Items 0.5 days Fri 12/14/01 Fri 12/14/01

41 CE (EMC/EMI) Testing 1.2 wks Fri 12/14/01 Fri 12/21/01

42 Plan Test Activities 0.5 days Fri 12/14/01 Fri 12/14/01

43 Contingency Day 1 day Sat 12/15/01 Sat 12/15/01

44 Testing<=>Remediation Cycles 3 days Mon 12/17/01 Wed 12/19/01

45 Summary & Action Items 1 day Thu 12/20/01 Thu 12/20/01

46 Contingency Day 0.5 days Fri 12/21/01 Fri 12/21/01

47 Return Travel 1.5 days Fri 12/21/01 Sat 12/22/01

48 Write Reports 29 days Sun 12/23/01 Wed 1/30/02

49 Analyze Report 9 days Thu 1/31/02 Tue 2/12/02

50 Review Report Analysis 9 days Wed 2/13/02 Mon 2/25/02

51 Remediation Effort (if Needed) 6.2 wks Tue 2/26/02 Tue 4/9/02

52 Plan Remediation if Needed 6 days Tue 2/26/02 Mon 3/4/02

53 Implement Remediation Items 38 days Tue 2/26/02 Mon 4/8/02

54 Remediation Review 1 day Tue 4/9/02 Tue 4/9/02

55 Write Compliance Report 1 day Wed 4/10/02 Wed 4/10/02

YKitahara

BMayer,GS3,HHoshino

YKitahara,BMayer,GS3

BMayer,GS3

GS3

BMayer

YKitahara

BMayer,YKitahara

YKitahara,BMayer

BMayer,YKitahara

BMayer

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug SepQtr 4, 2001 Qtr 1, 2002 Qtr 2, 2002 Qtr 3, 2002

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt38

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Pro

ject $-Co

st Estim

ateP

roject $-C

ost E

stimate

R&D Project Labor and Material Cost Breakdown EstimateProject name: WJ-2000A NEAR-APCVD CLUSTER TOOL DEVELOPMENT -> See also file POS2000A.docProject item no.: 1 This estimate is used to establish engineering budget, POS cost estimate, obtain charge number and provide metrics baseline Estimated

Assigned Supervisor

Engineering DepartmentDescribe Skill

NeededPerson's

NameInitials to Concur

Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr-97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec-97 Jan-98Hours Totals

8 Team Leader B. Mayer 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 240 2880

5 PM translate/rotationA McGrogan 40 40 40 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 80 80 1120

14 Design & Document-Control; EUCLID trainedDD1 0 20 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1100

14 Design & Detailing; EUCLID trainedDD2 0 20 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1100

8 Electrical/Mechanical/Process TechnicianLAPage 20 80 80 80 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1460

8 Electrical/Mechanical/Process TechnicianE/M/P1 0 0 0 20 40 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 900

3 Electrical Engineer; SensorBus TrainedCSE1 0 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1680

3 Electrical Engineer/TechnicianRLIfland 0 20 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 80 80 1020

7 ME: Design injector , PM upper chamberAQMiller 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1920

7 ME: Design Process Chemical Delivery SystemWJWilliams 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1920

7 ME: Design and Improve Wafer Heating ChuckKWVeeck 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1920

7 ME: Assist Z. Yuan with CVD Byproduct control developmentS. Murphy 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1920

2 General Mechanical structural design, Exhaust system designCCCollins 120 120 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 0

6 Procecess Engineer: Assist Z. Yuan with CVD Byproduct control developmentLHMichael 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 Procecess Engineer: SubProject leader for CVD Byproduct control developmentZ. Yuan 120 120 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1840

8 Procecess Engineer: Lead MACH1 POC tool lab operationsL. Zhang 120 120 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1840

8 Electrical/Mechanical/Process Technician: Assist Z. Yuan with CVD Byproduct control developmentM. Talley 0 0 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 760

8 Embedded ControlGRBoehm 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 Embedded ControlGRBoehm 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 Embedded ControlWJShands 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 ControlWORKS GUIFSMenagh 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 Software TestingTQWolf 40 80 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 1320

8 Design meets S2-93 etc.P. Clark 0 20 40 40 40 40 40 20 20 20 20 20 320

8 Training for installFPE1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 40 80 80 320

0Engineering Hours Subtotal 1540 2000 2560 2820 2960 3120 3120 3100 3220 3140 3100 3100 0 31940

Other Department

2 Start on ManualsC. Gavin 40 80 120 160 160 560

3 Design for ManufacturabilityRAEwald 0 40 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1560

4 Dsign For ReliabiltyRE1 0 40 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1560

5 20 20 40

6 PA1 0 0 20 120 160 160 160 160 80 40 20 20 940

7 S.Kidder. A2 0 0 0 40 80 200 300 300 200 40 40 40 1240

8 T. Tomlinson 20 40 40 20 120

9 R. Cadwallader 0 0 0 20 80 80 80 80 40 20 20 20 440

10 JKTalley 0 0 0 40 80 160 160 160 160 160 80 40 1040

11 RWCarlton 40 80 120

12 Design for ServiceabilityFSE1 0 40 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1560

13 D. Denton 40 80 80 80 40 20 20 20 38014 M!, M2, M3, M4 0 0 0 80 200 400 400 200 200 80 40 40 1640

Sales & Marketing Design of SalabilityWJShaffer 0 40 80 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 1600

0Other Dept. Subtotal Hours 0 0 160 340 940 1280 1720 1820 1680 1480 1160 1100 1080 0 11200

Grand Total Hours 0 1540 2160 2900 3760 4240 4840 4940 4780 4700 4300 4200 4180 0 43140

Notes month Jan-97 Feb-97 Mar-97 Apr-97 May-97 Jun-97 Jul-97 Aug-97 Sep-97 Oct-97 Nov-97 Dec-97 Jan-98100% of hours available during month 200 160 160 200 160 160 200 160 160 200 160 200 200

Estimated nonrecurring cost by month incurred (in k$)Material Cost 45 60 45 25 25 25 35 35 35 50 75 75 $530Capital Equipment 0 0 0 90 200 400 400 250 90 0 0 0 $1,430Travel and Living Cost 5 20 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $40

Process Engineering

Spares

Technical Writing

Senior Manufacturing

Reliability

Purchasing

Assembly

Test

Fabrication

Senior Production Control

Process Engineering

Drafting/Documentation

Mechanical Engineering

Drafting/Documentation

Process Engineering

Control Systems Engr.

Control Systems Engr.

APCVD Next

APCVD Next

APCVD Next

APCVD Next

Core Development Engr.

Software Engineering

Machinist

Inspection

Contracts/Reports

Field Service

Software EngineeringSoftware Engineering

Software Engineering

Software Engineering

Software Engineering

Software Engineering

Process Engineering

Software EngineeringProcess Engineering

APCVD Next

Process Engineering

Mechanical Engineering

Software EngineeringProcess Engineering

Safety

Field Process

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt39

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

How Do I Prepare For SysEngr?How Do I Prepare For SysEngr? Take Courses

OUTSide Your Discipline

Listen Carefully to Product Users

Learn to Write, and Write a lot

Become Comfortable in Front of an Audience

Take LEADERSHIP Positions

INCOSE Cert

Academic Discipline No. Courses

Mechanical Engineering 24

Electrical Engineering 16

(Applied) Math 12

Materials Science 5

Computer Science 3

Physics 3

Economics 2

Chemistry 2

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt40

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

SE Disciplines QualifyingSE Disciplines Qualifyingfor SE Experiencefor SE Experience

• Requirements Engineering• Risk and Opportunity Management• Baseline Control• Technical Planning• Technical Effort Assessment• Design Development• Qualification, Verification, and Validation• Process Definition• Tool Support• Training• System Integration• Quality Assurance• Specialty Engineering

SE

Cer

tific

atio

n

CSEPCSEP

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt41

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Professional Engineer LicenseProfessional Engineer License What is it?

• Defined by the State of California PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ACT– Business and Professions Code § 6700 – 6799

• §6701. Professional Engineer Defined – “Professional engineer”… refers to a person engaged in the

professional practice of rendering service or creative work requiring education, training and experience in engineering sciences and the application of special knowledge of the mathematical, physical and engineering sciences in such professional or creative work as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning or design of public or private utilities, structures, machines, processes, circuits, buildings, equipment or projects, and supervision of construction for the purpose of securing compliance with specifications and design for any such work.

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt42

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

How to Earn the LicenseHow to Earn the License1. Graduate

From an ABET-accredited engineering program at a college or university

2. Earn Engineer-in-Training (EIT) Cert Pass the 8-Hour FUNDAMENTALS Exam

Take After 3rd Year at ABET an Approved University

3. Accumulate 6 yrs qualifying experience 4 yrs for BS; 5 yrs for MS or PhD

Need at Least ONE year of REAL Experience

4. Pass the 8-Hr, Discipline-Specific Professional Engineer’s Exam

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt43

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PE

Exam

Ap

plicatio

nP

E E

xam A

pp

licationNOW $275

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt44

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Are the TestsAre the TestsHard?Hard? EIT → Not so Bad

FE exam Pass Rates

Examinees' college/university degree discipline

First-time takers

Repeat takers

Chemical 80% 26%

Civil 75% 23%

Electrical 60% 25%

Environmental 71% 32%

Industrial 54% 12%

Mechanical 83% 28%

Others 75% 26%

PE → Can be Quite Difficult

PE Exam Pass Rates • October 2004

Examination First-time takers

Repeat takers

PE Agricultural 55% 42%

PE Chemical 72% 30%

PE Civil 59% 28%

PE Control Systems 71% 45%

PE Electrical and Computer 62% 25%

PE Environmental 69% 40%

PE Fire Protection 51% 27%

PE Industrial 62% 26%

PE Mechanical 65% 31%

PE Metallurgical 64% 21%

PE Mining and Mineral 75% 50%

PE Nuclear 41% 0%

PE Petroleum 66% 32%

PE Structural I 43% 18%

PE Structual II 56% 34% • About 60% for CE,

EE, and ME

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt45

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Why Earn the PE License?Why Earn the PE License?

Do I NEED it?• Civil Engineers → Absolutely REQUIRED

– 90% of CE Work Must Be Approved by A State-Licensed Civil/Structural EngineerCE is PRACTICE REGULATED by the State of Calif.

• EveryOne Else → NICE to Have– 90-95% of Work in the Other Major Disciplines

Does NOT require licensureEE and ME are PARTIALLY Practice-Regulated

Primarily Those who Work for the State, Cities, and Counties

ALL Other Branches are NOT Practice-Regulated Thus NO Regulation-Driven Registration

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt46

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PE Exam Test-Takers by Discipline • 2003

5710

4492

534

518

93

36

12

11

7

4

3

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000

ALL

CE

ME

EE

Chem

E

FireE

CntrlE

PetE

IE

MtlE

Man

fE

Dis

cip

lin

e

Number of Takersfile = Salary-Survey-2004_0503.xls

About 18% of “Engineers” are Licensed• This California Data suggests that ~75% of

these are CEs– Or about 4.5% of All NonCE “Engineers” are

Licensed 56k out of 1250k by BLS Stats

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt47

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

Historical Pass RatesHistorical Pass Rates

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt48

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

If Not CE, Then Why PE?If Not CE, Then Why PE?

Licensure DISTINGUISHES you from other Engineers

CREDIBILITY when starting your own business or consulting

ONLY PE’s Can use the Terms• Professional Engineer

• Consulting Engineer

• Registered Engineer

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt49

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

If Not CE, Then Why PE? (cont)If Not CE, Then Why PE? (cont) For an engineer, becoming registered or

licensed is comparable to • A Medical Doctor passing the

medical board examination

• An Lawyer passing the bar examination

• An Accountant becoming a CPA

Thus, becoming a licensed engineer grants you an enhanced status in the eyes of the public, and equates you with professionals licensed in other fields.

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt50

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

If Not CE, Then Why PE? (cont)If Not CE, Then Why PE? (cont)

Only LICENSED PROFESSIONALS are allowed SIGN and SEAL Engineering plans for the Public

Licensure is a sign of COMMITMENT to your PROFESSION

The PE license Enhances your Potential for Salary-Increases and Promotions

Yields a Higher Level of Respect and Credibility among your engineering peers

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt51

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PE Q&APE Q&A Who Writes the Exam?

• CA uses FE and PE Exams Written by the National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES)– Located in Clemson, SC

– You Can Help WRITE EXAM QUESTIONS after you obtain Your License...http://www.ncees.org/exams/volunteer/

Where are the Exam Sites?• San Mateo, Sacramento, Pomona,

San Diego

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt52

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PE Q&APE Q&A

I want to Take the MetalE Exam, but I need THREE Licensed References, AND MetalE is small discipline that is Not Heavily Registered. HOW can I get the Required Refs?• The PE Act Exempts from Licensed Refs

NonCivil Engineers Practicing in IndustryPlain Language Pamphlet http://www.dca.ca.gov/pels/e_plppe.htm

2: Q26. What constitutes a satisfactory reference in connection with an application?

In California, electrical and mechanical (and other Branches) engineering work performed by employees of the Federal Government, and employees of manufacturing, mining, public utility, research and development, or other industrial corporations is exempt, and thus, such employees may serve as references whether or not they are licensed as long as they are qualified to appraise the technical competency of the applicant.

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt53

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481

PE Q&APE Q&A HOW and HOW-

MUCH Should I Study for the Exam?

Lots of Prep Materials Available• GOOGLE Search on

“California PE Exam Study Course”– http://

www.pelicense.org/– http://ppi2pass.com/

catalog/servlet/MyPpi– http://

www.uclaextension.edu/

Plan on Studying the Equivalent of a 5-unit Qtr-Course• 15 hrs/wk for

about 11 wks

Session Date ME Exam Topic

1 7/5/05 Intro to Exam / Engr Economics

2 7/12/05 Dynamics

3 7/26/05 Thermodynamics

4 8/2/05 Power Cycles

5 8/9/05 Fluids

6 8/16/05 Heat Transfer

7 8/23/05 HVAC 1

8 8/30/05 HVAC 2

9 9/6/05 Combustion

10 9/13/05 Statics, Mechanics of Materials

11 9/20/05 Mechanics of Materials, Failure

12 9/27/05 Machine Design 1

13 10/4/05 Machine Design 2

14 10/11/05 Compressible Fluid Flow/ WrapUp

[email protected] • ChabotENGR-CalPolySLO_SystemEngr_0505.ppt54

Bruce Mayer, PE CalPoly SLO –MATE481