Blue Falcon Mines Ltd.1585-B Britannia Road E., Suites 11 ft 12, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2M4

410ei9SEeei2 2.6163 HUFFMAN

ut c i o i9nPROPERTY MINING LANDS SECTION

This property is located in Osway and Huffman Townships of the , Porcupine Mining Division of the District of Sudbury in the Province of Ontario. It consists of 28 mining claims numbered as follows:

Huffman Twp.: P683153 to P683156 incl. (4) l

Osway Twp.: P652614 to P652623 incl. (10) P682901 to P682914 incl. (14)

The property is in good standing with the Provincial Mining ] Recorder, and is currently held by Messrs. G. Leliever and C. Black, both of which are in the employ of Blue Falcon Mines of Suites 11 5 12, 1585-B Britannia Road East, Mississauga, Ontario. These 28 claims are in the process of being transferred into Kidd Resources Inc. pending successful underwriting of the company.

LOCATION S ACCESS j

This property is located in southeastern Osway Township and southwestern Huffman Township, along the southern shore of Opeepeesway! Lake, (see O.M.N.R. plans M.1043 and M.940). j

i

Access to the property is gained by travelling south from thei

village of Gogama approximately 37 kilometres to the junction of jHighway 560 (to the east) and the "Eddy" road to the west. Following i the Eddy road westward for approximately 32 kilometres to the Sultan road,

This road runs north and then swings westward where it meets the Jerome Mine road at the 12 kilometre mark. Taking the Jerome road one travels northeasterly for approximately 15 kilometres until a "Y M is met in the

road. This intersection is in the southwest portion of the property as indicated on the accompanying geophysical plan.

EXPLORATION HISTORY

The Opeepeesway area was the focus of much exploration activity early in the 1940's, subsequent to the discovery of the Jerome Mine by Mr. Bert Jerome in 1938. The property was held intermittently from this time until the present by many companies as well as speculators.

2.

Exploration to date has culminated in the discovery of at least two separate (possibly related) gold prospects commonly referred to as the "Skye", and the "BiOre". The geology and grades of which are adequately presented in the O.D.M. preliminary geological map of the Jerome area (west and east) by G.M. Siragusa. All grades mentioned or obtained to date have indicated sub-economic concentrations of Au., but are confined to a large eastywest (conformable) unit in the

volcanic pile and may be significant on a large scale mining operation. The extent of this unit is unknown, and a V.L.F. electromagnetic survey was conducted to define the limit of the unit pending a favourable electromagnetic response.

SURVEY PERSONNEL

An EM (V.L.F.) survey was carried out on this property in mid November 1983. Personnel involved in the survey included Robert Leliever of Mississauga, Ontario (operator), John Daley of Thornloe, Ontario (operator), Calvin Black of Gogama, 'Ontario (assistant operator), and Leo Snider of New Liskeard (assistant operator). All personnel were under the direct auspices of the author during the survey, and all were in the employ of Blue Falcon Mines Ltd. of Mississauga, Ontario.

SURVEY PROCEDURE

Upon entering the area it was immediately noticed that an old j grid system had been previously established. This grid was in fair condition, but the writing on the pickets (used as station markers) was unclear and hence, the use of assistant operators to assist in location and the clarification of the writing on the pickets. This grid consisted of a baseline with a 1,000 metre north tie line. The base line has an azimuth of 110 0 (east) withqffsets every 120 metres in the northerly (020 0 ) and southerly direction (200 0 ). Offsets were measured every 25 metres along lines, and readings were recorded at each station, facing north in each instance. Total number of kilometres surveyed was 40.5 kilometres with a total of 1,621 individual readings.

The very low frequency '(V.L.F.) electromagnetic survey is a passive electromagnetic technique utilizing electromagnetic radio waves transmitted worldwide for marine navigational purposes. The signal

i

used in this survey originated in Cutler, Maine, U.S.A., some 1,270

3.

kilometres to the east at an azimuth of 104 0 . The station code is NAA,

transmitted at a frequency of 17.8 kHz, at a radiated power of 1,000 kW.

The Geonics EM-16 hand held receiver used in this survey is capable of measuring the variations in the tilt angle of the electromag netic polarization ellipse resultant from the distortion from the normal caused by irregular conductive bodies acting upon the transmitted ; signal. This unit measures the in-phase component as a percentage \ of the horizontal normal field (real component), as well as, measuring the amplitude of the minor axis of the polarization ellipse (quadrature

i

response).i

As the real component decreases and approaches zero percent, the receiver is approaching a conductive target, and as the real component becomes negative, the receiver passes the conductor. The quadrature j

responses to the conductor are a semi-quantitative measurement of the \ interference caused by overburden inconsistencies and other geological

quirks.

All the values obtained were recorded and plotted on the accompan

ying geophysical plan. The results were then profiled at a scale of |

one inch equals 201.

GENERAL GEOLOGY imiu ' •J~"T ""~~ "" ~ " - - - j

This property is located within the southeastern extension of the Swayze synclinorium of the Abitibi greenstone belt. As is typical of jgreenstone belts in the Canadian Precambrian terrain, this belt consists

i of an extensive area of steeply dipping volcanics and sediments in amajor synclinal structure. The belt has undergone metamorphism typicajl to the greenschist facies. Flanking these supracrustal on the north | and south is the granitic terrain of the Precambrian Shield. The belt; in this portion of the syncline has been intruded by a large felsic mass

(locally called the Jerome Felsite) which apparently concentrated or introduced economically significant metals.into the meta-volcanosedimen-

tary contact with the felsic* intrusion. Large scale fracturing has i displaced the belt in a left-lateral (sinistral) fashion at several

locations along the extent of the belt. j

This particular property lies along the southern contact of thei

Jerome Felsite with the metavolcanosedimentary horizons. This latter

4.

I unit strikes in the east/west direction and is vertical to steeply dippings, therefore providing an easily recognizable cross-section of the belt and its various units which may be discernable by detail

ground geophysical techniques.

INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Several linear electromagnetic conductors were located in this ; survey. Due to the regular nature of these conductors (i.e. parallel) it is thought that these conductors reflect definite lithologic units

which parallel the regional trend of the metavolcanis, and therefore suggest syngenetic accumulations of sulfidesCor conductive units) representative of several distinct phases of volcanism. The larger, more consistent conductors are thought to represent iron formation, while the smaller conductors are thought to represent thin accumulations of sulphide minerals occupying the ancient volcanic piles, depressions or valleys and thus exhibiting limited extent.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Several linear conductors were located within the limits of the claim group, all trending in a general east/west direction. These ' conductors have been interpreted as being reflections of sulphide accum ulations in the volcanic pile and suggest multi-phased volcanism in this area. It is known that some of these conductors contain sub-economic concentrations of Au., which have been tested in the past. It is there-

i

fore recommended that these conductors undergo further geophysical investigations by ground magnetics(to delineate any sulfide or oxide facies iron formations), and a detail geological mapping program during the summer months.

This report is respectfully submitted by

NEIL NOVAK/B.Sc.

41009SEI8SHa 3.6163 HUFFMAN 900

1984 05 28 Your Pile: 364 Our Pile: 2.6163

Mr. Bruce HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated May 10, 1984 - Geophysical (Electromagnetic Survey on Mining Claims P 683153 et al in the Townships of Osway and Huffman.

The assessment work credits as listed with the above mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416) 965-6918

M.E. Anderson:se

cc: Blue Falcon Mines Limited Suite 341565 Britannia Road Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2V6

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining 6 Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

cc: Resident. Geologist Timmins, Ontario

yr.2\ Ministry ot i ecnnicai Assessi IV/) Natural .., . . ,. m VJiy Resources work CreditsOntario JA

FMe 2.6163

(Date Mining Recorder's Report ofJ 1984 05 10 Workfjo - 364

Recorded Holder

BLUE: FALCON MINES (CORD LELIEVER AND CALVIN BLACK)Township or Area

OSWAY AND HUFFMAN TOWNSHIPS

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical40 A

Electromagnetic-.—..... . — -.. ... . .- _ .— --days

Magnetometer _ . _ -.. ...... _ — .. — — - - ___ days

Radiometric — . .. - - -. . . days

Induced polarization _____ ......... __________ days

Other-.. ^. __ ___ ..-..--. __ . _ ——- ___ days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Asjesied" column

Geological -... . - _ ,. _ -..-— — — - _ . days

Geochemical . - . .. - -- . — - days

Man days D Airborne d

Special provision E Ground E3

PM Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

EH Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P 683153 to 56 inclusive 652614 to 21 inclusive 682902 to 14 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 DAYS CREDITED 2 0 DAYS CREDITED

P 652623 P 652622 682901

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77 (19)—60:

828 (83/6)

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1984 05 10

Mr. Bruce W. HanleyMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Your file:

Our file: 2.6163

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-6918.

Yours very truly,

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316M.E. Anderson:mc Encls.cc: Blue Falcon Mines Ltd

Suite 341565 Britannia Road Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2V6

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 05 10

2.6163/364

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

Ministry olNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list,Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of SurveyU)

____Claim HoFderU)

Q Osway

AddressFalcon Mines ( lord Leliever and Calvin Black!

L5.ri;tannia Rd . ii Mississauga Ontario .

and Huffman^

' Company

as aboveDate o f S urvey (from ft to) Tfotaf Miles of l ine Cut

Name a nd Address o f A uthor (of Geo-Technical report}

___Neil Kovak P.O.Box ?8 Heidelberg Ontario

J.8 11; 83, 23 11 83 40.5 kilometrJ -HiV—UyiP' :— Yrj_L Day l Mo. | TT. | _____^——-—-——-——-——

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Specie! Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 4 0 d ays. (This includes line cutting!

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter totalls) here "

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnet

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

c

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

40

--——

Days perClaim

——

Days tier Claim

,-...

Exoenditures (excludes power stripping)T vfe of Work Performed - - ~" .

l

Po'iormed on ClaimtsJ

Calculation of Expenditure Days^CrediU

Total Expenditures

|s 15

tTou

lays Cr

~ "~ "

1 edits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of dajys credits per claim selected in columns at right. j l

\ f f \i rDate Rico'rc/od Holderlor^Agri

Kov. 23, 1983 \l\ j jJVVKTt (SignatiJ re)

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

p J68J113.6J

1 6e6fi53156

652614! 6^52615

, r 652616

••* L6J 165

)2.6l?^... 52618S2619

! 652620'6jM 21

652622650623682901682902682903682904 682905682906^^.

L 6829pZ^^, :682908682909

Expend. Days Cr.

404o

404040404040404040404040404040 4040

4040

.^ - **^?**S*- — -̂ ^^j,

For Office Use Only7 otal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Flecorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining CiairnPrefix

P

f? lLv ,

: *' ' ' " 5 f\"'. i. -. i. \ i * V

Number

682910682911682912^ 682913682914

•' t ; r H

— --

Mi . i

" ' i t ' f p - ' t*i-\

-

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISIONi i-----..----,.^.-.

Expend. Days Cr.

404040^ 4040 _

i -' _ -

VK-^

— - — ——

\r\\ ~NDV-2 4.1983. t—....

A.M. P.M.

i -^

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Mirfirfg f/

MinirEiranch D

iQ Records xrector r/

r jy —— "

28

^ —

Certification Verifying Repor

Date Certified

Nov.23,1983

l hereby certify that i have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Marne and Postal Address of Person Certifying

r;oil Novak P.O.Box ?8 Heidelberg Ontario

Ministryof GeotechnicalRecces ^port

Ontario At Approval

File

Mining Lands Comments

\Z4Z: Geophysics

Comments

f^A'pproved Q] Wish to sec again with corrections /9 /f 'J

Signatur

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

j"" J Approved f""") Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

L..D

(l Approved [J Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 I3).I

Initial Ctiecl.

Assessed

Approved Reports of Work sent out

Notice of Intent filed

Approval after Notice of Intent sent out

Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist

Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.

1983 12 21 Our File: 2.6163

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 683153 et al 1n the Townships of Osway and Huffman.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

E. F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Roon 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

A. Barr:me

cc: Calvin Black P.O. Box 189 Gogama, Ontario POM lWO

cc: Blue Falcon Mines Ltd Suite 341565 Britannia Road Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2V6

cc: Gordon Lei i ever 14 Pineel iff Drive Streetsville, Ontario L5N 1E3

cc: Nell Novak Suite 11 S 12 1585 Britannia Road East Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2M4

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey (s) Electromagnetic (VLF)Township or Area, Osway and Huffman Townships Claim Holder(s)-jj-ol'-4. Leliever and Calvin Black

per JB1u^ P'alcon Mines—-—-————-Survey Company Blue Falcon Mines Ltd.

Author of Report^!! Jip yak Address of Author 3te 11 A 12Covering Dates of Survey ^ 8/1 1/8f ^t

Total Miles of Line Cut 40.5 kilometres

B Britannia Rd Ontario

-

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical --Electromagnetic.

DAYSper claim

4o

—Radiometric

-Other ———Geological./Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision Credits do not aptoly tp airborne surveys)

__Electromagnetic.,____(RaplidirnetncMagnetometer

DATE:

(enter days per chiif

1 3 1983 SIGNATURE!Thor "M Rep.

Res. Geol. —— . Qualifications.

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

"(prefixf " " ' (number)'68315V 652614, 652615,

l*.**..**^.**.**********..**.*.l.**.*******.*ll....l

652619, 652620, 652621,

652622, 652623/682901, ................................../r...................682902, 682903, 682904,

, 68290?,

..^2.?.9.1^,..6.8l-2909.,. >.6829lO,

682914,

RECEIVED

TOTAL CLAIMS——ZB—Clairos-

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

CiROUNI) SURVEYS^ If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations l y 621_______________________

Station interval __25 metres________________

Profile scale_One Inch equals 20 per cent

Contour interval _Aj.f-i^——————^^———.—-—^—-.——^

.Number of Readings 1621

.Line spacing 120 metres

y,O

Instrument.

Accuracy — Scale constant

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value —-——

OH W

O

iw

Instrument .^eonics ii.M.l6 (V.L.F.j hand held reciever

Coil configuration -——————.————-——————^———.—-^^^^^——.^.^^^———Coil separation .———-—-^-—-—-——.^————.^—^-.——-——..—...^^————..-.—-

Accuracy________,.-^—.--——————-—-^—————^^-——-.-—-—-————-

Method:

Frequency——

d Fixed transmitter D Shoot back O In line CD Parallel line

17.8 KHZ. MA Cutler Maine. U.S.A._________________(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured Real (in-phasej component and Quadrature component

Instrument

Scale constant.—

Corrections made.

^5 Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

2H

N*—4

Pd

J

a yQ X.

H

Instrument ————..-—.—.

Method l~'l Time Domain

Parameters - On time ___

- Off time ___

- Delay time.

l l Frequency Domain

_ Frequency _____

_ Range —-——————

— Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array——

Electrode spacing —

Type of electrode —

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method..^—-——-————-.--^——.--——-—..—.^-.—-———..——..—.^..———-————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured —

Energy windows (levels)———--.-—-——^———-—-—..^-———^————...——————-——

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count. Size of detector—————-.—^—-^——^-^-^—-——————-—————.——.——--—-—-—————

Overburden -^——-————.—-—-......---—..—^—-—————..—..—........—————^—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey^^—-—————-—-——-—.—————.—-—-——.Instrument ————.———^—^—-——-—-—.^————-—-———Accuracy—^—^——————————————————Parameters measured ^^^^———————-^—————

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ———— Instrumcnt(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy-—-———-—...——..—^^-—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^^—————..——^——-——————————————

Sensor altitude——^..^——————————.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________.Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight———————.

Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth_____. Terrain ——————.—.

Drainage Development——————-———— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis —————

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p. p. b.

n oD

Cu, Pb,

Others —

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (.—Extraction Method. Analytical Method-

Reagents Used ———Field Laboratory Analysis

No. ____________Extraction Method.

Analytical Method - Reagents Used,__

Commercial Laboratory {. Name of Laboratory_ Extraction Method—— Analytical Method——

Reagents Used ^————^

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

General. General.

O STWAYPORCUPINE M INING- D/V/5/ON

M.I043ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

-4-0 Ch*3'sfs

A7A LLARD

530807 5 30560' 530559P ^J;t~p"~Tp'"r '"

576231 '5/30808

' s 564315 '584321 | Prsr V

S 1584314 ,584316 ^, ---'p/!

1^ I&83820 l S8382I . CttJ.i'&e 6P1.SJ— 4- — —— 4-

, | . i - — -4- - -

J53S943 .5.35944

722863 .722865

F'581173 J 584185

i f;

- 5i08C

^307/93 S3u796 530799'-t- - -

P .P 'P

400 surface r 't. rts ^vcr;on n'Oirc.' at' . f O ; ve:?

F IN C-fi, L4I009SE&812 2.6163 HUFFMAN 300

iTfi-

o s

icxJ* r*

iV)O

Eric Twp.-M.789 Frater Twp.

W ^- - -r-ir X

^"^zto^ \T3^^-ttt'*'ffai9o'i^}ij1*WYb\)M^3 ^vtI^J^j**2r i^ssr?*^*^^i.VsiHW*!^^^''-^^^ -'^iT^ ^.-^i^awus ;w*4*4 , swu** fa^K* s-**^-

Arbutus Twp.- M.6334l089SEe*12 2.6163 HUFFMAN

l-r t

THE TOWNSHIP OF

.. ......^...SiUOtMRY

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

SCJM.E: HNCH-4O

LEGEND

UNCS MAftfcH OH MUttl*

t\'

400 SurfBc* Ri^hU R***nr alien '

PLAN NO M.940

ONTARIO* p

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING B RANCH

PE

EP

EE

SW

AY

OA

DER

OSI

ERS

, W

HA

LEN

GA

RN

ET

B

EN

TON

M

ALL

AR

D-T

f ER

IC

; H

UFF

MA

N*'

PO

TH

ER

S

NE

VIL

HONG

KON

G:

EDIT

H FIN

GAA

RB

UTU

S

YE

O

CH

EST

CH

AM

PAG

NE

LON

DO

NO

E-

LOC

ATI

ON

M

APS

CA

LE

l "*

8 M

ILE

S~3

**r

f

f l

^'J

f

••v^'

CLA

IM

MA

P

(M.N

.R.

PLA

NS

M

. I0

43.M

.940

)

SC

ALE

l"

=

1/2

MIL

E

jvv",

, -^

s?/ -

x-

de:-"

*^A

o \^ ..

--

7

r*

7

LEG

EN

D

AB

AN

DO

NE

D

PO

WE

R

LIN

E

PR

OP

ER

TY

BO

UN

DA

RY

TR

AIL

, P

OR

TA

GE

TOW

NS

H

P LIN

E

SU

RV

EY

P

OIN

T

(ST

AT

ION

)

E.M

. R

EA

DIN

G

real

(le

ft)

qua

d (r

ight

)

RE

AL

CO

MP

ON

EN

T

PR

OF

ILE

-9^^

--Q

UA

DR

ATU

RE

C

OM

PO

NE

NT

P

RO

FIL

E

CO

ND

UC

TOR

A

XIS

(n

umbe

r)

CR

OSS

OVE

RS

(str

ong,

mod

erat

e ,

wea

k)

BLU

E

FALC

ON

M

INE

S

LTD

.O

SW

AY

a H

UFF

MA

N T

WP

SV

LE

EM-1

6 SU

RVE

Y(L

ELIE

VER

S

BLACK

GROUP

OSWAY)

41009SEeei2

2.6163 HUFFMAN

SCALE= |:Z

400