8/3/2019 Bloomberg Terminal Stands on the Precipice(2009)

1/2

SAI

AAA

The Bloomberg Terminal Stands On The Precipice

Jay Yarow | Feb. 27, 2009, 8:12 AM | 17,678 | 8

Bloomberg News has been feted with gushing features about its brilliance two years in a

row now. Fortune in 2007 and Vanity Fair in 2008 fawned over the financial data

companys growth, particularly its ability to hire more journalists. In an era of bankrupted

newspapers, any journalistic organization hiring more people is newsworthy.

While the story for 2007 and 2008 certainly was Bloomberg, it wont be the story for

2009. That distinction will go to its rival, Thomson Reuters. And if Bloomberg isn't

careful, the story will last much longer than that.

Bloomberg is rushing headlong into expanding and improving its news operations. Its unassuming website and unwatchedtelevision networks are due for a tune up by new Internet, radio and television chief, Andy Lack. Its a good idea to improve

lagging parts of the operation; its just bad timing for such a move. Trust us, news sites arent cash cows. And ask Fox how

easy it is pry the attention of people away from CNBC.

At the same time that Bloomberg directs its resources towards news operations, the part of its business that actually

makes money faces rough times. Bloomberg L.P. is almost entirely built on the back of its 290,000 data terminals that cost

between $1,500 and $1,800 monthly. But with financial firms cutting head count, terminal sales will likely drop. Theres no

point in keeping a data terminal if theres nobody to man it. We saw an early indication of this last year. Between June

2007 and March 2008 there were 34,000 job cuts by Wall Street banks. By the end of the year Bloomberg saw a drop in

net sales of 1,100. That equates to losing almost $20 million in revenue. While the company is still minting cash, this

troubling trend wont reverse anytime soon.

Meanwhile, Thomson Reuters, who is not encumbered by terminals, just turned in a killer quarter. Net income was $656

million on $3.4 billion in revenues. It raised its dividend by 4 cents a share and its 2008, free cash flow was $1.8 billion.

The company also raised its 2009 expectations. It's 2008 operating profit was $1.9 billion, compared to Bloomberg's

estimated $1.5 billion, though Bloomberg has a much higher margin.

Tom Glocer, Thomson Reuters CEO, told the FT that business with Lehman Brothers was picked up by Barclays and

Nomura, while the mainly fixed-income business at Bear Stearns shifted to JPMorgan Chase. He also added that as long

as Citi and BofA dont collapse (no guarantees there) revenue would continue to grow. There's a good chance the same

could happen for Bloomberg. After all, Merrill doubled its terminal contract after being acquired by BofA. When Merrill sold

its 20% stake in Bloomberg back to Bloomberg, the data company wrote into the contract that Merrill would have to double

its terminal contracts if acquired.

However, Bloomberg only sells one product at one price. If a financial company needs to reorder its balance sheet, it might

consider a new provider of information.

Thomson Reuters sells a diverse set of products at a diverse set of prices. Weve also been told from a Thomson Reuters

source that demand for their developer tools and software has gone up ten-fold. It recently closed two of its biggest

software sales ever. When the market is acting as unpredictably as it is, there is a premium for great data. It can sell

terminals for half the price of Bloomberg, but that's not what it does. Thomson Reuters sells data and technology.

Like0

Page 1 of 4The Bloomberg Terminal Stands On The Precipice

5/10/2011http://www.businessinsider.com/thomson-reuters-will-eat-bloomberg-lps-lunch-in-2009-20 ...

8/3/2019 Bloomberg Terminal Stands on the Precipice(2009)

2/2

Twitter Facebook Buzz Digg StumbleUpon Buzz Reddit LinkedIn Email Embed

Alerts Newsletter

Blackboard Home

Edit This

Bloomberg, though, is stuck with its terminals. Maybe they're as addictive as heroin, but in this environment, methadone

will do have to serve as a replacement. Bloomberg signs its clients up for two-year contracts, so it will still get some money

even if it loses customers. Of course there are perils in this too.

From Fortune: Of course, there are occasional situations in which some customer goes out of business and

Bloombergs are a casualty. In a case like that, the immediate financial hit to Bloomberg LP is mild, given that it has

been paid quarterly in advance. But Bloomberg is stung nevertheless, because the customer won't be finishing out

whatever remains of its two-year contract, probably won't be paying the "breakage fee" that is supposed to apply tocontract terminations, and won't be signing up for a new contract.

All of that, for example, describes Amaranth Advisors, a $9.5 billion hedge fund that went calamitously out of business

last fall, losing $6.4 billion for its investors. At death, it had 221 Bloombergs worldwide. Those were in effect returned to

Bloomberg LP, except that the company has a policy of letting any user who loses his job have a Bloomberg at home

for four months - free of charge - while he tries to get hired somewhere else.

By January, most of the Amaranth employees had indeed taken new jobs and were once again re-equipped with

Bloombergs. So Grauer was then measuring his Amaranth loss as amounting to only 41 terminals, which struck him as

bearable. Besides that, the electronic sign hanging near his desk and keeping tabs on net installs was proclaiming that

the company was having a fine start to the year.

That sales picture could change quickly. Despite Bloomberg's ever-blooming drive to broaden its customer base - to

become a staple at law firms, for example - the company is cyclically tied to the financial world.

Hmm. Have hedge funds really shown a bit of a tendency toward calamity these days? We. think. so.

Admittedly, talking about the future of Bloomberg is tough. It is a tight-lipped private organization that doesnt have to

disclose business plans. A source at the company tells us that its revenue will be fine this year, and that it doesnt really

care what people say. Though we hear from an outside source that Bloomberg is hiring more people for data sales.

If this is true, it signals a welcome shift in Bloomberg's business away from terminals (and news) towards something that

can protect them from the wolfpack nipping at its heels.

For the latest tech news, visit SAI: Silicon Alley Insider. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Tags: Media, Bloomberg, Dow Jones, Blogging, Hires And Fires | Get Alerts for these topics

Share:

Bloomberg

Page 2 of 4The Bloomberg Terminal Stands On The Precipice

5/10/2011http://www.businessinsider.com/thomson-reuters-will-eat-bloomberg-lps-lunch-in-2009-20 ...