blind analysis contest 2009 - 防災科研(nied) · 2013. 9. 23. · e-defense blind analysis...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Blind Analysis Contest 2009
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
Results of the Contest
-
Contest Categories
Winner is selected for each of the four categories:Category1 3D Analysis, Steel damper Category2 3D Analysis, Viscous damperCategory3 2D Analysis, Steel damperCategory4 2D Analysis, Viscous damper
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Responses to be predicted (each item has four values which consist of the combination of small / big shaking and X / Y direction except for item c. For 2-D analysis, values of Y-direction and strain are to be predicted.)
a. Maximum values of absolute relative displacement from base and absolute acceleration at each floor
b. Maximum values of absolute story shear and story drift angle at each storyc. Maximum strain at a column in 1st story and middle of a beam in 2nd storyd. Maximum and minimum values of damper force in 1st and 4th storye. Maximum and minimum values of damper deformation in 1st and 4th story
Definition of errors: square-root of sum of squares of errors (RMS errors)
: Predicted response: Measured (actual) response
Points for each response: 8pt. for smallest RMS errors, 5pt. for 2nd ,3pt. for 3rd,1pt. for 4th
∑ −=j
jkjkk FFE2*
,, )(
jkF , *, jkF
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
Basic Contest Rules
-
52 teams from 8 countries in totalTable : Number of Participants
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
Number of Participants
Country\Category Category1 Category2 Category3 Category4 TOTALJapan 8 2 3 2 15Taiwan 3 4 4 4 15
U.S. 2 4 3 3 12China 2 4 0 0 6N.Z. 1 0 0 0 1Italy 1 0 0 0 1
Canada 0 0 1 0 1UAE 0 0 0 1 1
TOTAL 17 14 11 10 52
Category 2: 3D Analysis, Viscous Damper Category 4: 2D Analysis, Viscous Damper Category 1: 3D Analysis, Steel Damper Category 3: 2D Analysis, Steel Damper
-
Participants (1)Category1 : 3D Steel Damper ( Honorific title abbreviation)
Akihiro Nakao (+7) Nihon Sekkei, Inc., JapanHidenori Shimizu (+3) Ando Corporation, JapanMinoru Shugyo Nagasaki University, JapanNaohiro Nakamura(+5) Takenaka Corporation, JapanTadamichi Yamashita (+5) Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., JapanTakafumi Nakagawa (+3) Building Research Institute, JapanTakehiko Terada (+2) Shimizu Corporation, JapanTomohiko Moroishi (+3) Maeda Corporation, JapanGary S Prinz (+1) Brigham Young University, U.S.Liling Cao (+3) Thornton Tomasetti Inc., U.S.Shuguang Wang (+3) Nanjing University of Technology, ChinaXuchuan Lin (+3) Tsinghua University, ChinaMing-Chieh Chuang (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYi-Jer Yu (+3) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYuan-Tao Weng (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanRui Pinho (+3) EUCENTRE Pavia, ItalyTrevor Kelly (+1) Holmes Consulting Group, New Zealand
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category2 : 3D Viscous Damper ( Honorific title abbreviation)Naohiro Nakamura (+5) Takenaka Corporation, JapanTadamichi Yamashita (+5) Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., JapanBill Tremayne Holmes Culley, U.S.Ganesh Thiagarajan (+1) University of Missouri Kansas City, U.S.Liling Cao (+3) Thornton Tomasetti Inc., U.S.Oh-Sung Kwon (+1) Missouri University of Science and Technology, U.S.Dino Chen South China Univ. of Tech, ChinaDongsheng Du (+3) Nanjing University of Technology, ChinaJianrong Yang (+6) Kunming University of Science and Technology, ChinaPanwen (+6) Kunming University of Science and Technology, ChinaMing-Chieh Chuang (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanTzu Kang Lin (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYi-Jer Yu (+3) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYuan-Tao Weng (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., Taiwan
Participants (2)E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category3 : 2D Steel Damper ( Honorific title abbreviation)Harumi Yoneda (+5) Takenaka Corporation, JapanTadamichi Yamashita (+4) Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., JapanYasuyuki Nagano (+ 8) Fukui University of Technology, JapanBruce Maison Structural Engineer, U.S.Liling Cao (+3) Thornton Tomasetti Inc., U.S.Yushu Liu (+3) Stanford University, U.S.Ming-Chieh Chuang (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanTzu Kang Lin (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYi-Jer Yu (+3) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYuan-Tao Weng (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanJack Wen Wei Guo University of Toronto, Canada
Participants (3)E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category4 : 2D Viscous Damper ( Honorific title abbreviation)Harumi Yoneda (+5) Takenaka Corporation, JapanTadamichi Yamashita (+4) Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., JapanBruce Maison Structural Engineer, U.S.Dimitrios Lignos (+3) Stanford University, U.S.Liling Cao (+3) Thornton Tomasetti Inc., U.S.Ming-Chieh Chuang (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYi-Jer Yu (+3) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanYuan-Tao Weng (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanTzu Kang Lin (+4) National Center for Research on Earthquake Eng., TaiwanMohamed Al Satari American University of Sharjah, UAE
Participants (4)E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category 1 : 3D Analysis Steel Damper(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 15% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 15% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 15% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 300 600 900 1200 1500Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Dampers Y-dir. 15% (mm)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Dampers Y-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement X-dir. 15% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration X-dir. 15% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle X-dir. 15% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 300 600 900 1200 1500Maximum Absolute Story Shear X-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Dampers X-dir. 15% (mm)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-450 -300 -150 0 150 300 450Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Dampers X-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
E-ディフェンス ブラインド解析コンテスト2009
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 15%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 30 60 90 120 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Dampers Y-dir. 100% (mm)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1800 -1200 -600 0 600 1200 1800Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Dampers Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 30 60 90 120 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement X-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3000 6000 9000 12000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration X-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle X-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear X-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Dampers X-dir. 100% (mm)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
-
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-900 -600 -300 0 300 600 900Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Dampers X-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
-
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
3D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 100%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
-
Category 2 : 3D Analysis Viscous Damper(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20 40 60Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 40% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 40% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 40% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-10 -5 0 5 10Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1000 -500 0 500 1000Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20 40 60Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement X-dir. 40% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2000 4000 6000 8000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration X-dir. 40% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle X-dir. 40% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000Maximum Absolute Story Shear X-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper X-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper X-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 40%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 50 100 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5000 10000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1400 -1000 -600 -200 200 600 1000 1400Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 50 100 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement X-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5000 10000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration X-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle X-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear X-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper X-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper X-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
3D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 100%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category 3 : 2D Analysis Steel Damper(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 15% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2000 4000 6000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 15% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.0000 0.0004 0.0008 0.0012 0.0016 0.0020Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 15% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 500 1000 1500 2000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 800Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 15% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 15%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 50 100 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5000 10000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1600 -1200 -800 -400 0 400 800 1200 1600Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Steel Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 100%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category 4 : 2D Analysis Viscous Damper(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20 40 60Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 40% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 40% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 40% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1000 -500 0 500 1000Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 40% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 40%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 50 100 150Maximum Absolute Floor Displacement Y-dir. 100% (mm)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5000 10000 15000Maximum Absolute Floor Acceleration Y-dir. 100% (mm/sec2)
Floo
r
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0.000 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.010Maximum Absolute Story Drift Angle Y-dir. 100% (rad)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
2
3
4
5
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000Maximum Absolute Story Shear Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25Axial Def. of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
1
4
-1400 -1000 -600 -200 200 600 1000 1400Axial Force of 1st and 4th Story Damper Y-dir. 100% (kN)
Stor
y
Measured1st2nd3rd
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
2D Viscous Damper Blind Analysis Prediction Results(Measured and Best 3 Teams of Each Response Quantity)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Axial Strain at the Designated Points of Colum and Beam 100%
Measured 1st 2nd 3rd
Column Beam
(μ)
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category1: 3D Analysis, Steel damperNaohiro Nakamura, Takuya Suzuki, Soshi Nakamura, Masashi Yamamoto and another 2Takenaka Corporation, Japan
Category2: 3D Analysis, Viscous damperTadamichi Yamashita, Jun Kawabata, Masayuki Ninomiya, Masaki Shibata and another 2Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., Japan
Category3: 2D Analysis, Steel damperHarumi Yoneda, Masashi Yamamoto, Takayuki Sone, Naohiro Nakamura and another 2Takenaka Corporation, Japan
Category4: 2D Analysis, Viscous damperTadamichi Yamashita, Jun Kawabata, Masayuki Ninomiya, Norikazu Sakaba, and another 1Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., Japan
Winners will be invited to and will be awarded at the 7th CUEE and 5th ICEE Joint Conference, 2010, Tokyo, Japan.
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
~ Winners ! ~
-
Category1 (3D Analysis, Steel damper)Best 3 Teams
Winner (134 pt.) Naohiro Nakamura, Takuya Suzuki, Soshi Nakamura, Masashi Yamamoto, Takayuki Sone and Harumi YonedaTakenaka Corporation, Japan
2nd-place (107 pt.)Yi-Jer Yu, Jui-Liang Lin, Pei-Ching Chen, Min-Lang LinNational Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan
3rd-place (90 pt.)Minoru ShugyoNagasaki University, Japan
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category2 (3D Analysis, Viscous damper)Best 3 Teams
Winner (131 pt.)Tadamichi Yamashita, Jun Kawabata, Masayuki Ninomiya, Masaki Shibata, Norikazu Sakaba, Yukimori Yanagawa Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., Japan
2nd-place (96 pt.)Naohiro Nakamura, Takuya Suzuki, Soshi Nakamura, Masashi Yamamoto, Takayuki Sone and Harumi YonedaTakenaka Corporation, Japan
3rd-place (70 pt.)Yi-Jer Yu, Jui-Liang Lin, Pei-Ching Chen, Min-Lang LinNational Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category3 (2D Analysis, Steel damper)Best 3 Teams
Winner (50 pt.)Harumi Yoneda, Masashi Yamamoto, Takayuki Sone, Naohiro Nakamura, Takuya Suzuki, Soshi NakamuraTakenaka Corporation, Japan
2nd-place (43 pt.)Bruce MaisonStructural Engineer, U.S.
3rd-place (42 pt.)Yushu Liu, Gregory Deierlein, Xiang Ma, Dimitrios LignosStanford University, U.S.
3rd-place (42 pt.)Yi-Jer Yu, Jui-Liang Lin, Pei-Ching Chen, Min-Lang LinNational Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009
-
Category4 (2D Analysis, Viscous damper)Best 3 Teams
Winner (90 pt.)Tadamichi Yamashita, Jun Kawabata, Masayuki Ninomiya, Norikazu Sakaba, Yukimori Yanagawa Kozo Keikaku Engineering Inc., Japan
2nd-place (55 pt.)Liling Cao, Ali Ashrafi, Elisabeth Malsch, Graeme BallantyneThornton Tomasetti Inc., U.S.
3rd-place (38 pt.)Harumi Yoneda, Masashi Yamamoto, Takayuki Sone, Naohiro Nakamura, Takuya Suzuki, Soshi Nakamura Takenaka Corporation, Japan
E-Defense Blind Analysis Contest 2009