-- '_..t

Black Gold Mine Property Teck Township;

District of T emiskaming NTS 42/A 1

48° 08' 52" N 80° 01' 19" W"

• 6

Prepared by: E. Marion

APR 3 0 Z01Z GEOSCIEtJCE ASSESSMENT

OFFICE

INDEX

Property Location .................................................................................... 3

Access .............................. ............... .... ........... . .................................... 3

C1aims .................................... ............................................................. 3

General Geology ..................................................................................... 3

Claim Geology ..................................................................................... 3. 6

Previous Work ...................................................................................... 6. 8

Pr~s~nt W ()rk

Srunples ............................................................................................................................ 8

R ~S11ltsffiisr.nssi()n 1()

Assay Sheets ............................................................................................................... 11 , 12

Compilation/Comparison of Multi -element ................................................................... 13

Bibliography ................................................................................................................... .i , ii

FIGURES

Fig - 1 Location .................................................................................... 1

Fig- 2 Claim Map .................................................................................. 2

Fig- 3 General Geology of the Kirkland Lake Area........................... .. ........... .4

Fig - 4 Kirkland Lake - Breaks and South Mine Complex ................................................ 5

Fig - 5 Claim Geology .............................................................................. 7

Fig- 6 Srunpling Location ......................................................................................... 9

Photo 1 & 2 ...................................................................................................................... 14

.' Kirkland Lake Resident Geologist's District

ao·

50 100km

SCALE: 1:2,000,000

Figure -1

5334000N

~ -· ~ ., fD

N •

3004538 l2874

Nh

L1754

L18625

UTM Zone17 1000m gr1d

L16620

•

L3468 571000E

L8682 1111453

\ .,../L6681 .'/ . 1t11 441

,1 \ 1

' I ' / I 1

572000E

\ I

\ ' I

L8679 1111~0

fl

...--, I I

573000E

G-3917 Teck Twp f- ~ Lebel Twp G-0639

574000E

-574000E

.3oo6753 L297'7 "·.

()

~-3 s: Ill

""0

5332000N

PROPERTY LOCATION

This property is iocated in Teck Township, Larder Lake mining division. The cfatms are located on the Teck Twp.- Lebel Twp. line, with the #2 post of the mining claim being 450 feet north of the three mile post. This is in the Kirkland Lake Resident Geologist district and can be found on NTS 42 A\1 with the geographic center of the claim being at approximately 80° 01"19W and 48°08" 52'N.

All mining services and supplies are readily available in the area. Hydro lines and roads cross the property. Skilled workers are numerous in the region as the area is experiencing heightened mining and exploration activity.

ACCESS

Turning south off of Highway 66 (Government Road) at Allen Avenue and heading south on this street for 1800 feet, the street will cross over the north boundary of the mining claim at a point about 11 00 feet west of the #1 claim post.

CLAIMS

This project consists of a staked mining claim totalling two claim units, covering approximately 28.3 hectares recorded as L 1199891, on Plan G-3917 of Teck Township, Temiskaming District. The claim covers the key claims of the former Black Gold Mines property.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

This property is in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt of the Superior Province, in a region dominated by variably deformed Archaen mafic to intermediate, pillowed to massive and agglomeratic volcanics with minor clastic interflow and fluvial sediments with attendant mafic to felsic intrusives. The claims lay about 1 mile north of the Larder - Cadillac Deformation Zone (LCDZ), a major east-west structural control on gold bearing alteration and mineralization, which in much of its length coincides with a folded and deformed sinuous belt of sedimentary rocks of Temiskaming age. To the north of the Temiskaming sediments, the Blake River intermediate volcanic rocks form a large east plunging synclinorium which host the Noranda area VMS deposits located about 60 kilometers to the east.

The property lays in the Kirkland Lake camp. The seven mines in Kirkland Lake, of which only the Macassa Mine is still in production, have produced in excess of 30 million ounces of gold at an average grade of about .49 oz/ton. The productive breaks are generally quite extensive laterally and have been mined down to 8200 feet.

CLAIM GEOLOGY

The claim encompasses the key claims of the former Black Gold Mine. The property is located in Kirkland Lake directly south of, and contiguous to the Wright Hargreaves and the Toburn gold mines, two of the historic producing gold mines on the "Kirkland Lake Main Break".

The The property is underlain by Temiskaming aged sediments consisting of greywacke, polymictic conglomerate, tuff and small amounts of trachyte. Numerous Algoman aged feldspar porphyry dykes cut the sediments in a general east- west direction.This assembiage is the same as that of the productive mines adjacent to this property.

The property is eastward on strike of the very high grade, multi million ounce "South Mine

3

General Geology of the Kirkland Lake Area

20 0

+

+

+

12

+

LEGEND L.S. Jensen Proterozoic

K-"-" dilbase (not shown I 12 Cobalt Group

Archean Matach-" dilbae (not lhownl

Granitic ruc:X1 11 G~orite, monaonite, QU.u monmni1e,

11Vetlite 10 Meaive m vneiaic quartz diorite, toMtlte,

trondhjemite Upper SupergrouP

9 911• Tlmllkaming Grvup, 9b•• Damn· Porcupil'll Complex ·

8 81, Sn, Slekl Alwr Group, Be••• B .. kl River (Upper Fm .. TIIdale Grouol

7 7a, 7b, Klnojevit Gtoucl. 7c Klnojms Group, (Mktdle Fm .. Tlldlte GrouPI

8 S. Lud• lakl Grat p, 6b Stoughton RGq~Mma~N Groug, 6c L.awer Fm .. Tbda6e Clfvup

fi lie PaR:upine Group l..oWIIW SUPM91NPt

• 4a Skead Qroup, 4b Hunter Mine Group, 4c ~ Fm .. Delora Gto\lp

3 ~ Qdtlerine Group, Jc Middle Fm. Deloro Groucl

2 211 w-.-. Gmup, 2c Lowvr Fm. Deloro Group

1 1 a Pacaud t\.lffs***"

•• ··b •••c .... ret .... to Kirkland Lake Am, -.mllmb of synclinorium (Jensen 1978c, 1979) . rwfen to Klrk .. nd Lake Area, norm limb of synclinorium (Jensen 1976, 1978b). raftn to Timmins Ani (Pyke, 1a801. (GOOdWin, 19651 •

Figun- 3

12

u "' as lolol ::;)

0

• •. 1oo- .,

r · . . '

ly

'Jt

. ~-, ··30 --- L~

OUTH CoMPLEX' I ,

- j ..... - · -~ ' . ~- '· . - ~ ---- - ..

I -I

·'• · •'

G

I·

...

-" ..

0 • .

0 100m 250m -· 800111 1 ... m

Complex" presently yielding terrific exploration results for Queenston and Kirkland Lake Gold on the adjacent property holding. Current drilling is successfully expanding the ore eastward. The Black Gold Mine property is the only land holding likely to host "South Mine Complex" gold presently available* in Kirkland Lake.

Recent drilling by the holders of the Rand Gold Mine property contiguous directly south of the property has encountered a new high grade gold system only 200 meters south of the common boundary. It appears that this zone may trend into the Black Gold Mine leases. (ref: http://www. queenston. calnewslpdf/111201.pdf)

Favourable geology is present on the property .. Proven gold bearing laterally extensive quartz veins previously discovered on the property. Potential for ore shoots in this vein system is quite good. Gold bearing veins/breaks of the Kirkland Lake camp were mined only 1000 feet north of this property, on the Kirkland Townsite Mine property.

PREVIOUS WORK

The key claim (shaft claim) was acquired in the early days of the camp. On the extreme north west of the property, there are three parallel quartz veins/breaks which were exposed on outcrop. They are numbered 1, 2, and 3 from north to south. They strike slightly north of east and dip steeply to the south. Frequent showings of visible gold were noted along the veins.

In around 1917, an inclined shaft was put down 125 feet and about 40 feet of drifting was done on the #1 vein. The vein was exposed by this work as a narrow quartz stringer dipping steeply to the south. The reported assays gave up to .72 oz/ton across 1% feet.

In 1935, a cross-cut was driven south fron the shaft on the 125 foot level. The #2 vein was drifted on for 205 feet to the east of the shaft, and for about 95 feet to the west of the shaft. Channel samples on the #2 vein showed values up to 2.52 oz/ton, with an average of about .21 oz/t for the entire 295 foot length of the vein.

In around 1937, a total of 13 drillholes were put down to search for the possible extension of the 1, 2, and 3 veins in the shaft-area and to investigate the nearby Murdock Creek fault. All holes gave numerous sections of gold values, with vein material assaying up to 1.4oz/t. Wide areas of alteration and pyrite mineralization are well detailed in the available drill logs. These vein system appears to have good continuity and been shown to be gold bearing across a strike length of about 500 feet to a depth of about 1 000 feet, and is open on strike and dip.

Drilling of the Murdock Creek zone encountered a brecciated quartz-calcite zone with gold values across up to 39 foot core length, with one 8% foot section assaying .128 oz/ton. This zone is open along strike and dip.

The property was dormant untill the late 1960's when the mining rights reverted to the crown. In mid 1980 Strike Minerals acquired the property by staking. The mineral rights of claim L2728 was staked as L566424, and the mineral rights of claim L 1535 was staked as L566425. Strike Minerals performed assessment work as follows :

In July 1981, an AQ sized drill hole was put down 101% feet. The hole was located 400 feet east and 150 feet south of the #4 post of L566424. The drill log notes conglomerate for the length of the hole but there is no mention of the #2 vein. From the layout, it appears that the drill hole was collared to far to the north and overshot the #2 vein. The hole would not have reached the #1 vein.

In October of 1982 Strike Minerals sampled a 60 foot ± length of the #2 vein. Twenty samples were taken with the average being about .261 oz/ton for all the samples.

6

, , ...... " ., I I

' I II f ,.,. ...

T2 - Conglomerate T3 -Tuffaceous Conglomerate T4 - TuffandAgglornerate T1 Trachyte. Trachytic Breccia A9 - Syenite/Feldspar Porphyzy o 100' lOO'

__ NA 1535

/4. •• I , .. , I " I ' t J \

In October of 1983, an AQ sized drill hole B-2 was put down to a depth of 183 feet. The hole was located 600 feet west and 200 feet south of the #1 post of L566424. The #2 vein was encountered at 87 feet to 88 feet. No assays accompany the assessment report.

In July of 1985, an AQ sized drill hole B-3 was put down to a depth of 101 feet. The hole was located 50 feet west of hole B-2. The #2 vein was encountered 41 feet down hole. No assays accompany the assessment report. None of the 3 holes went deep enough to cross the #1 vein.

Strike Minerals allowed the claims to lapse in 1995. The author of this report staked the claims when they came open in September of 1995. The claims were finally registered in the name of the author in April of 2007.

Sampling was done by the author to verify the auriferous nature of the exposed #2 vein in 2007-08. Assays of vein material showed up to .51 ozlt with average assay of about .25 ozlt and assays of pyritic wallrock assayed up to .25 ozlt with the average about .07 ozlt.in . The sampling program was successful in verifying the auriferous nature of the #2 vein. The results were comparable to those of the prior sampling work.

PRESENT WORK

The remaining surface exposure of the east end of the #2 Vein is still accessable on an empty lot at the east end of the historic trenching. Here the vein is still traceable for about sixty feet on surface. The exposed vein here is about 4 inches average width. The quartz present appears to be two generations, with a whiter quartz cemented by alated clearer quartz. The quartz is quite stained by rust from oxidation of the pyrite on surface. The conglomerate wallrock to the vein is heavily pyritized. Many of the clasts in the conglomerate adjacent to the vein show brecciation and infilling with quartz-calcite in random appearing clots and fine stringers. Quartz and calcite are present as grains and clots in the matrix of the rock The pyrite alteration extends up to about 1 Y:z feet into the conglomerate on both sides of the vein.

We decided to do a geochemical assessment of the nature of the type of pyrite present in the wallrocks of the #2 Vein . Five samples of the pyritic wallrock from beside the Vein with up to 1 0-15% pryites, and 3 non pyritic wall rock samples taken from about 2 feet away from the #2 Vein were assayed for multi element -30 metal analysis. Samples submitted previous to 2012 were added to increase the database for comparative purposes.

SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS (2012)

809432,809433,809434,809435,809436 Crushed conglomerate, pyritized wall rock grab samples, 1 0 - 15 % fine pyrite, lightly carbonate altered, grit to wacke matrix supported, odd jasper grain or fragment, frequent clasts altered to a cream to buff colored carbonate material. Likely Temiskaming in age as all other local sediments. Some clast types appear to have been more heavily pyritized than others. (note that the referenced wallrock samples from previous submissions are of this type)

809437,809438,809439, Temiskaming pebble conglomerate wall rock grab samples, odd pyrite, lightly carbonate altered, grit to wacke matrix supported, odd jasper grain or fragment, several mafic and felsic clast types noted,

8

~.)))Stc3c ') :? ·s ?:> 'i 'J c., AI'

0\

<:::::::>

<::::> <:=>

c:::::::::::::>

<:::=::> <::::> c::>

c:::::::>

Pyrltlzed

Sample '/1,

Quartz Vein

/// Jill

809-4-32

Conglomerate ~ c::>

0 5 10

<::::>

20

1 inch = 10 feet

30

NAD83 0572583mE

·.

RESULTS

The three highest gold values also had the three highest Fe values, three of the four higest vanadium values (the 4 highest gold values have the 4 highest vanadium values), and three of the four highest arsenic values, and the three lowest MgO values. Silver spikes with the gold values which is typical in the Kirkland Lake area, suggestion gold as electrum. There appears to be elevated arsenic values corresponding to the higher gold values. The apparant loss of manganese, magnesium and strontium with a gain in vanadium is likely related to chemical changes associated with solubility in the mineralizing fluids.

The high Ca in sample 809432 can be explained by several calcite-quartz fragments? or replacements? in that sample. (see photo 1)

Other variability in the mearured values of metal constituants in the samples are to close and within the margin of error to define an actual loss or gain from the pyritizing event and would be relatively safe to state that these were present in the original composition of the rock.

It appears that gold associated with silver and arsenopyrite with minor amounts of galena are associated with the pyrite alteration. This fits well with other gold occurances in the Kirkland Lake camp, and may indicate a common source of the mineralizing fluids. More detailed geochemistry would be required to further

10

b1ab lis l1cd I <J 2~

ERIC MARION PROJECT: BGM ATIN: Eric Marion

Swastika Laboratories Ltd Assaying - Consulting - Representation

Multi-Element ICP-AES Analysis Aqua Regia Digestion

Report No Date Sample Type

Page 1 of 1

A 12-1093 (i) April 10, 2012 rock/grab

Ag ppm

AI As So Be Bi

% ppm ppm ppm ppm

Co Cd Co Cr Cu Fe K Mg Mn Mo No Ni P Pb Sb Sc Sr Te n v w y Zn Zr Sample Number

% ppm ppm ppm ppm % % % ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm

809432 809433 809434 809435 809436

809437 809438 809439

Blanks blonl::

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.2

1.56

4. 11

3.13

2.69

< 0.2 3.63

0.3 3."

0.3 3.49

0.3 3.73

< 0.2 < 0.01

21

27

40

45

47

21

29

21 < 0.5

92 < 0.5

17 < 0.5

38 <0.5

142 < 0.5

41 < 0.5

49 < 0.5

53 < 0.5

<5 < 10 <0.5

< s 11. 75

< 5 0.85

< 5 0.55

<5 1.73

< 5 0.93

< 5 2.37

< 5 3.63

< 5 3.58

<5 <0.01 <I

:'0

50

53

53

46

36

41

<I

211

610

491

474

595

.. 3

459

531

<I

II 2.53 0.13

18 6.1l 0.12

17 5.62 0 .09

26

26

124

39

46

1>..79 0.24

6.06 0.19

4.22 0.10

4.37 0.11

4.58 0. 13

4.34

4.23

3.28

2.77

3.77

:WI

740

636

703

651

3.60 881

3.89 992

4.07 1141

<I < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 <5

0.02 82 657

< 2 0.03 217 1811

0.03 193 1363

< 2 0.04 178 1<76

< 2 O.Q3 233 1924

0.03 173 1267

< 2 0.03 147 1216

< 2 O.Q3 187 1394

<2 < 0.01 <I <5

Standards 43P CRM 0 .2 1.45 124 137 < 0.5 < 5 0.23 2 77 326 440 > 15.00 0.35 0.29 492 103 0.06 463 319

Duplicates

809435

1. No Reject

--

0.2 2.64 42 37 < 0.5 <5 1.67 2 39 456 26 4.58 0.23 2.69 704 < 2 0.04

0.2 gram sample is digested with 5. 7ml 2:1 HCIIHN03 at 95"C for 30 minutes and then at boiling water bath for 90 minutes, and diluted to 15ml

169 1431

18

33

40

28

38

19

20

27

<2

135

25

< 5

<5

<5

<5

< 5

<5

< 5

<5

5

<5

22

17

18

20

17

18

21

<I

5

177

122

79

317

139

34S

508

540

<I

14

17 313

0.06

0.08

0.09

< 2 0. 12

12 0.07

0.16

0.19

0.21

< 2 < 0.01

II O.QI

132 < 10

282 < 10

326 < 10

286 < 10

301 < 10

\53 < 10

ISS < 10

176 < 10

<I < 10

29 16

< 2 0. 12 27 6 < I 0

12

10

10

II

<I

10

CERTIFIED BY : _,I:_:~ L;\ L_

Jing Lin, M Sc.

119

98

75

104

97

105

122

<I

430

74

16

49

36

39

51

39

40

45

<I

14

37

Assay Certificate

Company:

Project

Eric Marion BGM

Attn: Eric Marion

Swastika Laboratories Ltd Assaying - Consulting - Representation Page 1 of1

Certificate Number: 12-1093

Report Date: 30-Mar-12

We hereby certify the following Assay of8 rock/grab samples submitted 23-Mar-12 by Eric Marion

Sample Number

809432 809433 809434 809435 809436

809437 809438 809439

1. No Reject

1

1

Au FA-AAB

ppb

374 191 467 214 352

15 19

< 2

Au Chk FA-AAB

ppb

J L \./1 Certified by --=._;-...... Od------------- -

Jing Lin, M Sc.

1 cameron Ave., P.O. Box 10, Swastika, Ontario POK no Telephone (705) 642-3244 Fax (705) 642-3300

1\Julti-F.lcmcnliCP-.U:S .\nal~sis .1\qua R.::gi;1 Uigcsrion

A .5 grr samp\a is digested Wtth 5 r11l 31 HCIIHN03 at 95"C for :? hours and ddt1led to 25ml

Sample Number

l'yntlc 10-m'. Wallrock 2<136?8 2010 l (436£')

Au Ag .C..I As Ba Be Bi Ca Cd Co Cr Cu ppm pp-r.l ppm ppm 'X, ppm opm ppm ppm

Fe Hg % ppm

K La Mg Mn Mo Na % ppm % ppm ppm %

Ni P Pb S Sb Sc Sr c Th Ti T1 U V 'N Y Zn Zr J)Pb ppm % ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm ppn·• ppm % ppm ppm pp:r; ppm J: r.:m pprr ppm

24 3610

?41611 ---

136 \U 2.64

365 0.3 2.26

12 0 9 1 f, J SP.

891 J .3 2.)2

1;.3 )~' l .l <S L52 c:-1 4Sr

~{j 40 l.~ .. ~) 0.92 <.1 46

98 61 0 ;; <''i O.SD <:1 4J

li/ 50 !l <5 /.')f\ -:1 4<1

).l/ 1'1

S67 2:0

"DO 12

570 15

& ~~ <I

&.to <1

7.~" -<1

6.6R <1

O.l'l U .U4 ~0.,\l

0.19 21 3.02 719

C.4! L1 1 82 374

0 .13 24 3.2G 181

2008l 243601 2020 2•:1602 7415

4,5 I .66 45.J 31 0.7 O.b:i 0.1 !><1.2 3S9 JS.!> 9.ll 0.7 G.JZ 18 2.04 d4l

:t.O 1.8~ 226.9 31 o.J a.so 0.1 <B.J 319 17.7 a.:l9 o.< c.s~ u 1.n 13<

____ 2<JSOJ 418 o.a 2.01 ao.o 4o O.l L ::s <0.1 l-4.7 LlO 24.3 6.~:J 0.4 G.)S /7 2.1.:1 450

2012 l 809J32 3H Q.2 1.$4 22 21 <,.& <S 1r.TS 20 211 II

809433 191 o.3 4.11 92 < o..s <S o.as 610 18 0.\1

80'/·134 46 7 0.3 3.13 40 21 <1).5 <5 0.55

<). (J.(Jl l3:; ! <191

< . .!. 0 02 J·11 1770

<2 O.G2 J OC: 11()1

G.02 231 1630

.Y'J ! .44 iO

ss 2.ll9 ~()

86 >S.OO l 7

39 :l-3'1 19

~ h 1 19

1' J(j")

J 2 St

14 27'1

1; G.Ol 220.3 0.099 37.6 4.87 l .7 !4.0 79

B.r,. C.!J! .:?10.6 0.129 ~H3.7 ei.I"..S 1.2 ~3.8 1 2.6

).b (.;.02 1:.J5.J <J.lll.t. 114,j ).90 1.9 l~.l l7S'

~7 18

1111 33

0.00 193 1343 40

<l

<S

a 12

< 5 17

117

1:22

79

S0'/05 214 c.2 ;u, 4.5 36 ·~.5 <5 1.73

so 53

41

63

0.13

0.11

Wl9

0.14

0.19

2.17 7IXl < 2 1104 118 !1.76 :15 < 5 18 317 < 2

Non pyrite Wallrock 809437 15

i\0943:~ 19

009439 < 2

Anne•

<0..2

0.3

3.63 2.47

3.A1 IJ

o.3 3.., 21

11..3 3.13 29 3.54

!<f-2 c o.s <$

41 c o..s <S

0.93 2 1.97 (12) UJ8(11)

2.37

49 < 0.5 < ~ 3.63

53 <O.S <5 3.68

3.19

46

36

•I

419 39 4.37

531 46 ... ,..

-09

0.10

0.11

0.13

3.60 881 120 19

3.8'1 992 ", Cl03 147 1216 20

4.07 1141 <2

~~

c.o3 181 139• 2J

10'9 1~9~

<5 2D 11

., 6

5

lUJ/ <1Ct <In

G.G6 <10 <10

C.l2 ~ 10 .,10

C.C9 <10 < lD

2.5 O.llS 0.3

JA C.09l G.4

J.' O.G49 C.3

Q_g

!..0

OS

:1.06

0.08

ClOP

0.12

O.ll7

0.~

0.14

0.19

0.21

0.19

1\JH

2:\8

4~3

5S1

923 €>32

328

<tO

C.4

C.J

0.2

1)2 < 10

Jf,

&2 50

59

•• :&82 <10 12 119

326 < Kl

286 < \0 10 15

< ~0

153 •10

I~ <10 10 105

176 < 10 li 122

161

53

l2. 3

16

49

J6

39

~I

- sample #809432

H~avilypyrltlc g~·tvaggloml'rat~ wtth s~v~ral calcite- fragm~nts or flll1ngs (Ca). and fragments ahnost compl~tel~· r~lact-d by a fine g~·ain tan to gut-ntsh carbon.1te mineral. P}Tttlc walrock to #2 \"eln on Black t.~ld ]\>fine prop~rty.

above (re-f: s;unple 809·1.'>2) sole is In centimeters

carbon.ue mlneralu•placE>d fngment In p)Titlc g~·lf ' agglomer ate ;tt2 Vein wall rock scale is ill centlmeteu

. '

Bibliography Charlewood, G.H.

1964:Geology of Deep Developements on the Main Ore Zone at Kirkland Lake District of Temiskaming, Ontario Department of Mines, Geological Circular No. 11 Accompanied by Sheets A through H,scale 1 inch to 400 feet

Colvine, A.C., et. al. 1988: Archaen Lode Gold Deposits in Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 139, Part 1-A Depositional Model and Part 11- A Genetic Model

Downes, M.J. 1981: Structural and Stratigraphic Aspects of Gold Mineralization in the Larder Lake Area, Temiskaming District Ontario; in Genisis of Archean, Volcanic Hosted Gold Deposits, Symposium Held at the University of Waterloo, March 7,1980, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 97, p. 66-70

Fortescue, J.A.C. and Gleeson, C.F. 1984: An introduction to the Kirkland Lake (KLIP) Basil Till Geochemical and Mineralogical Study (1979-1982), Timiskaming District, Ontario Geological Survey, Map 80 714, Geochemical Series, Compiled 1984

Gamble, David A.P., P. Geo 2011, Oct 11 Technical Report on the Resources at the Amalgamated Kirkland Property, Teck Township, Larder Lake Mining Division, Report for Nl 43- 101 on behalf of Queenston Mining

Hicks,K.D.,and Hattori, K. 1988:Magmatic-Hydrothermal and Wall Rock Alteration Petrology at the Lake Shore Gold Deposit,Kirkland Lake, Ontario; in Geoscience Research Grant Program, Summary of Research 1987 to 1988, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 140,Grant 313, p.192-204

Hattori, Keiko, and Levesque, G. 1989: Hydrothermal Activity in the Kirkland Lake Intrusive Complex,Temiskaming District, Ontario, in Geoscience Research Grant Program,Summary of Research 1988 to1989, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 143, Grant 313, p. 59-67

Jensen, L.S. and Langford, F.F 1983:Geology and Petrogenesis of the Archean Abitibi Belt in the Kirkland Lake Area, O.G.S. Open File Report 5455

Jensen, L.S. 1981: Gold Minerization in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Area; in Genisis of Archean, Volcanic Hosted Gold Deposits, Symposium Held at the University of Waterloo, March 7,1980, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 97, p. 59-65

Maclean, A. 1956: Geology of Lebel Township, District of Temiskaming,Ontario Department of Mines, Bulletin 150, Accompanied by Map53a, scale 1 inch to 1,000 feet

ii Ontario Geological Survey

1979:Airbourne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, Kirkland Lake Area, Teck Township, District of Temiskaming : by Questor Surveys Limited for the Ontario Geological Survey, Prelim.Map P.2263A North Half, and 2263B South Half,

Geophys. Series., Scale 1 :20,000, Survey and compilation February and March 1979 Ontario Geological Survey

1986: Volcanology and Mineral Deposits, Miscellaneous Paper 129 Ontario Geological Survey

1990: OGS Miscellaneous Paper 147, Report of Activities, Resident Geologists, page 257, G. Meyer et. al Past production in the Kirkland Lake Resident Geologist's District, (to the end of 1988),

Powell, W.G., Hodgson, C.J., and Hanes, J.A. 1989:The Expression of the Larder Lake Break in the Matachewan Area, Temiskaming District,Ontario; in Geoscience Research Grant Program, Summary of Research 1988 to 1989,0ntario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 143,

Grant 329, p. 125-132 Savage, W.S.

1964:Mineral Resources and Mining Properties in the Kirkland Lake - Larder Lake Area, District of Temiskaming, Ontario Department of Mines Mineral Resource Circular No. 3 Accompanied by Chart A Kirkland-Larder Lake Area, scale 1 inch to 2 miles

Thomson, Jas. E. 1948:Geology of Teck Township, District of Temiskaming, Ontario: Map No. 1945-1, scale : 1 inch to 1000 feet, Compilation for Publication by Jas. E. Thomson 1943

and 1944 Thomson, Jas. E.

1948:Geology of Teck Township and the Kenogami Lake Area : Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. XXVII, Part V, P. 1-53

Thomson, Jas. E., Charlewood, G. H., Griffin, K., Hawley, J.E., Hopkins, Harold, Macintosh, C.G.,Ogrizlo, O.S., and Perry, Wm.Ward 1948:Geology of the Main Ore Zone at Kirkland Lake : Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. XXVII, Part V, P. 54-188

Todd. E. W., 1928:Kirkland Lake Gold Area(a detailed study of the central zone and vicinity): Ontario Department of Mines, Vol. XXVIII

Toogood, D.J. and Hodgson, C.J. 1986: Relationship Between Gold Deposits and the Tectonic Framework of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt in the Kirkland Lake-Larder Lake Area; Geoscience Research Grant Program, Summary of Research 1985 to 1986,0ntario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 130,Grant 227, p.79-86

Kirkland Lake Assessment Files- KL- 0864 C.P. Forbes, "Black Property", Teck Twp. KL -0239 Black Gold Mine

DA"/S

MltRCH ll:.) loll

f. 'lff\Rto~ - r/ Dllf <iJtn-nPLt-..J/,1 )l'tMfl£ ~RISf.> I OEL!uf/i.ey

T. Tl Al/1/6'1 ~ fJA 'I - S mr.~uub

• 1664

APR 3 0 Z01Z GEOSCIEr~CE IISSESSMENT

OFFICE