biomechanical pulping of eucalyptus · biomechanical pulping of e. grandis on a pilot scale...
TRANSCRIPT
Biomechanical pulping of Eucalyptus
wood chips
André Ferraz1, Anderson Guerra2, Régis Mendonça2 and Paulo Pavan2
1. Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo, Lorena, SP, Brasil 2. Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile 3. Melhoramentos Papéis, Caieiras, SP, Brasil
Biopulping is defined as the fungal
pretreatment of wood chips for
production of mechanical or chemical
pulps
Introduction
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Cumulative energy (wt.h/kg)
Pu
lp F
ree
ne
ss
(m
L)
Introduction
Biomechanical pulping of loblolly pine
Energy versus freeness
Energy saving at Freeness of 100 mL = 38%
control
biotreated
Properties Control Biotreated *
Freeness (mL) 113 100
Burst Index (kN/g) 0.59 1.16
Tear Index (mNm2/g) 2.85 5.15
Tensile index (Nm/g) 15.6 24.6
Brightness (% ISO) 51.4 39.1
Typical strength and optical properties of
unbleached loblolly pine-TMP pulps
Introduction
Biomechanical pulping of Eucalyptus: Energy
requirements and savings – lab-scale TMP
Control Biotreated * Refining Energy
(kwt.h/ton)
Freeness (mL) Energy
(kwt.h/ton)
Freeness
(mL)
TMP 351 - 315 -
RMP 654 402 518 390
TOTAL 1005 402 833 390
Energy savings (% over control) 17
Introduction
1157 526 Breaking length (m)
11.35 5.16 Tensile index (Nm/g)
2.93 1.03 Tear (mNm2/g)
0.34 0.20 Burst (kN/g)
Biotreated Control Parameters
Typical strength and optical properties of unbleached
Eucalyptus grandis-TMP pulps (Freeness = 400 mL )
Introduction
Brightness 60% ISO 44% ISO
Wood biodegradation
White-, brown-, and soft-
rot fungi
For biopulping, minimal
degradation of cellulose is
required
Two types of white-rot:
erosive and non-erosive
Wood biodegradation
Erosive degradation of wood cell wall
Non-erosive degradation of wood cell wall
Trametes versicolor , non-selective white-rot
60
70
80
90
100
708090100
Wood weight (% of the initial)
Wo
od
co
mp
on
en
t
(% o
f th
e in
itia
l)
glucan
polyoses
lignin
Ceriporiopsis subvermispora , selective white-rot
60
70
80
90
100
859095100
Wood weight (% of the initial)
Wo
od
co
mp
on
en
t
(% o
f th
e in
itia
l)
glucan
polyoses
lignin
Mass-balance of wood components during
Eucalyptus globulus biotreatment
Wood biodegradation
Lab-scale
Large-scale
Main focus
Preparation of TMP pulps on a mill-scale by processing wood chips biotreated with C. subvermispora in a 50-ton chip pile Evaluation of bleachability and brightness stability of bio-TMP pulps
Mechanical pulping of Eucalyptus grandis
biotreated on a 50-ton pilot plant
Subject of this work
Eucalyptus grandis wood chips were treated in a biopulping
pilot-plant by Ceriporiopsis subvermispora
Materials and methods
Colonized wood chips were used as start-up inoculum seed for the
scaled-up biodegradation experiments (30 days culturing).
Materials and methods
1st scale-up on pilot-plant: 40kg of lab-inoculum seed + 760 kg of
decontaminated wood chips (5% w/w). (60 days culturing)
2nd scale-up on pilot-plant: 800 kg of pilot-inoculum seed + 7.2 ton of
decontaminated wood chips (10 % w/w). (90 days culturing)
Final scale-up on pilot-plant: 8-ton pile pre-cultured wood chips used to build
a 45-ton pile (18 % w/w). (60 days culturing)
Inoculation on a pilot plant
Build-up of the chip pile
Biotreated wood chips were refined on a mill
scale to produce TMP pulps
2-stage refining: 1st stage = TMP
2nd stage = RMP
Pulps were bleached with H2O2 after a Q-stage
Bleached pulps were submitted to photo- or
thermal-reversion to evaluate brightness stability
Materials and methods
Results and Discussion Energy consumption during TMP and CTMP refining of biotreated E. grandis (450 mL Freeness)
1st stage
2nd stage
total energy
913 Average Energy (kWh/ton) 745 756 1038
Energy saving (%) 18 27
Brightness Control TMP: 60% ISO Bio-TMP: 44% ISO
Bleaching of E. grandis-TMP pulps
H2O2 charge
(% on dry basis)
Consistency
(% on dry basis)
Temperature
(ºC)
Time
(h)
0 5 40 0.5
4 10 60 3
Process variables evaluated (24 experimental design)
Only H2O2 charge affected final brightness of
the pulps within 95% confidence level
Bleaching of E. grandis-TMP pulps
Effect of H2O2 charge
40
50
60
70
80
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
H2O2 chrage (% on pulp)
Bri
gh
tne
ss
(%
IS
O) control TMP
BioTMP
only Q-stage
40
45
50
55
60
65
0 50 100 150 200
Treatment time (h)
Bri
gh
tne
ss
(%
ISO
)
BioTMP
controlTMP
Thermo-reversion
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 2 4 6 8
Treatment time (h)
Bri
gh
tne
ss
(%
ISO
)
Photo-reversion
BioTMP
control TMP
Brightness reversion in
TMP-pulps from E. grandis
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
40 50 60 70 80
Initial brightness (%ISO)
Bri
gh
tnes
s l
ost
(%
IS
O)
aft
er 4
ho
urs
of
ph
oto
-rev
ers
ion
A
Bio-TMP TMP
B
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
30 40 50 60 70 80
Initial brightness (%ISO)
Bri
gh
tnes
s l
ost
(% I
SO
)
aft
er 1
44h
of
therm
al-
rever
sio
n
Bio-TMP
TMP
Brightness reversion in
TMP-pulps from E. grandis
Conclusion Biomechanical pulping of E. grandis on a pilot scale
promotes 18% of energy savings for preparing pulps of
450 mL of Freeness
Bio-TMP pulps from E. grandis are significantly darker
than control-TMP pulps
Brightness of bio-TMP pulps increases 10 points after a
simple alkaline washing
Brightness reversion in biopulps and control pulps was
similar
Research supported by FAPESP,
CNPq, CAPES, SCTDE/SP and
Melhoramentos Ltd.
Thanks to Dr M. Akhtar (Biopulping
International INC) and Dr R. Swaney
(Univ. of Wisconsin) for helpful
discussions on the building and start-
up of the biopulping pilot plant.
Acknowledgments