biological control of invasive weeds: the fight against ... of onsite ppts/wednesda… · rivina...
TRANSCRIPT
Biological control of invasive weeds: the fight against the
homogenization and decline of the earth’s floral biodiversity
Bill Overholt Biological Control Research and Containment Laboratory
Indian River Research and Education Center University of Florida
Aquatic Weed Short Course, May 2012
Outline
• What are invasive plants and why are they a problem?
• Why do only some exotic plants become invasive? some hypotheses
• Biological control as an approach for managing invasive plants
The breakup of Pangea
Species/area relationships
Vitousek et al. 1996. Am. Sci. 84: 468-478
Species 1
Adaptive radiation
Species 2 Species 3
Species 5 Species 6 Species 7 Species 4
Tim
e
So, what’s the issue? Homogenization of the earth’s biota
• Geographic barriers have broken down. Due to increased, and faster travel, exotic species are being moved around the world with unprecedented frequency
• For example, in Hawaii, the rate of introduction of new insects prior to human colonization (around 400 AD) has been estimated at one species every 50,000 to 100,000 years. Currently, there are 15-20 new insect species introduced every year (Beardsley, 1979). This is 0.75 – 1.5 million more introductions per year since human colonization.
Beardsley, J. W. 1979. New immigrant insects in Hawaii: 1962 through 1976. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 23:35-44.
Exotic plants
• The vast majority of plant introductions have been deliberate
• Many of introduced plants are useful, e.g. citrus, sugarcane, corn, soybeans….
• A few become invasive and harm to agricultural and natural areas
What is an invasive plant? • An alien plant that spreads naturally in
natural of semi-natural habitats and results in change in terms of species composition or ecosystem processes
• in Florida, there are currently 76 species on the FLEPPC Category I list and an additional 76 species on the Category II list – this species represents about 11% of the nearly 1200 alien species that are naturalized in the state
Why are we concerned?
• loss of biodiversity • loss of endangered and threatened species and
their habitat 42% of species on the US endangered/threatened list are
there because of competition with exotic species! Competition with invasive species ranks second only to habitat destruction a cause for decline of native species
• loss of habitat for native insects, birds, and other wildlife
• changes to natural ecological processes such as plant community succession
Plants
(Primary consumers)
(Secondary consumers)
(Tertiary consumers)
(Primary producers)
Sun (Energy)
The food chain
Herbivores
Carnivores Carnivores
Decomposers
Carnivores
Unknown
Ornamental
Agricultural
Aquarium trade
Forage
Packing material
Ballast
Origin of invasive plants in Florida
Brazilian peppertree Old world climbing fern
Air potato
Taro Guava
Allilgatorw
eed
Native elsewhere
Survival in transport
Establish in new area
Lag period
Spread
Ecological impact
Human impact
The invasion process
adapted from Sakai et al. 2001
Native elsewhere
Survival in transport
Establish in new area
Lag period
Spread
Ecological impact
Human impact
Pre
vent
ion
Era
dica
tion
Man
agem
ent
What can be done?
Regulation
Mechanical control
Chemical control
Biological control
Why are invasive plants a problem in areas of invasion but
not in their native homes?
Some hypotheses: • Hybridization
• Novel weapons • Suppression by herbivores and diseases
Hybridization hypothesis • Basis of hypothesis
– often an exotic plant is introduced more than once, at times from different geographic areas (this may be particularly true with ornamentals which account for ~ 70% of invasive plants in Florida)
– once two or more populations are established, they may hybridize
– hybridization produces new genetic combinations that may allow rapid evolution and adaptation to a variety of habitats
Example: Brazilian peppertree • Native to Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and northern
Argentina • Introduced into FL as an ornamental in 1800s • Invades a variety of habitats including disturbed
areas as well as pinelands, hardwood hammocks and mangrove forests
1832: Advertised in a NY seed catalog
1842-49: Specimen collected in Florida by Ferdinand Rugel
1898: Introduction of seeds from France and Algeria into USDA Plant Introduction Center in Miami
1900: Introduction from ‘somewhere in Brazil’ into west coast Florida.
Introduction history
Invasion of natural habitats
Chloroplast
Nucleus
Chloroplast DNA Nuclear DNA
+ A B x
A
+ AA BB x
AB
Molecular evidence of introduction history
Results – chloroplast DNA
A
B A
B
Williams et al. 2005. Mol. Ecol. 14: 3643-3656
A
B
Origin of Florida BP types
Williams et al. 2007. Heredity 98: 284-293
Nuclear DNA
Williams et al. 2005. Mol. Ecol. 14: 3643-3656
Percent eastern ancestry
Percent western ancestry
Climate modeling
Mukherjee et al. 2012. Biological Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-011-0168-7
A
B
What would happen if additional types of Brazilian peppertree were introduced?
Hybrid advantage?
Total fitness = seed weight x % germination x seedling survival x seedling dry weight
Geiger et al. 2011. Int. J. Plant Sci. 172: 655-663
Summary • Two types of Brazilian pepper were introduced into
Florida • They have hybridized extensively since introduction • The origins of the two types have been identified in
Brazil • The climates at the source populations only match
restricted areas in south Florida, suggesting that the two types could gain a foothold in the state.
• Hybridization may have allowed the northward expansion in Florida
Novel weapons hypothesis • Exotics may produce chemicals (allelochemics)
that decrease the competitive ability of natives. Plants in the exotic’s home may not be as susceptible to these chemicals because they have evolved defense mechanisms.
• Example: Diffuse knapweed, an invasive species in the western USA. Diffuse knapweed produces chemicals that negatively effect native vegetation in the USA. Related plants from Eurasia (knapweed’s native home) are tolerant of these chemicals (Callaway and Aschehoug, 2000).
Native range Introduced range
Brazilian Peppertree: allelopathy
• Purpose: To investigate allelopathic effects of BP on native plants and vice versa. Test the ‘novel weapons’ hypothesis
• Methods: – Irrigate plants with root exudates – Irrigate plants with aqueous leaf extracts
Effect of Schinus leaf extracts on germination
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Day after planting
% G
erm
inat
ion
WaterSchinusOak
Bidens alba
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Day after planting
% G
erm
inat
ion
ControlSchinus
Rivina humilis
Effect of BP leaf extracts on growth
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Treatment
Wei
tht (
g)
b
a
Control Schinus 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Treatment
% G
erm
inat
ion
b
a a
Control Schinus Quercus
Bidens alba Rivina humilis
Conclusions
• Brazilian pepper negatively affects at least some native plants
• This may be a factor in the invasiveness of Brazilian pepper
Biological control
• the use of natural enemies to reduce the damage caused by a weed population
• Types of biological control – Classical (= introduction) – Augmentation – Conservation
Classical biological control of weeds
• Based on the ‘natural enemy hypothesis’ • Exotic plants escape their natural biotic
regulating factors (herbivores and diseases) when they are moved from one area of the world to another.
• Escape from their natural enemies allows the exotic plant to reach higher densities in the invaded range than in the native range.
• Classical biological control is the practice of reuniting exotic invasive species with their co-evolved natural enemies
How Biological Control Works
Native home Invaded area
Biological
Control
Advantages of classical biological control
• Permanent solution when it works
• Low cost • Safe
Costs / Benefits of Classical Weed Biocontrol Programs
(after Mentz 1987)
Release of Bioagent
Time
Benefits (+$)
Costs (-$)
Research & Development
Maintenance & Monitoring
Steps in classical biological control of plants
• Taxonomic identification of the invasive plant • Identification of the native range • Foreign exploration for natural enemies • Host specificity tests in country of origin • Selection of agents thought to be host specific • Introduction through quarantine
Steps in biocontrol (con’t) • Host specificity testing under quarantine
conditions (related native plants and economically important plants)
• Petition for permission to release • Release • Evaluation of establishment, spread and
impact
Approach: The “pipeline”
Most important characteristic of biological control agents
Host specificity!!
Economic, Native and Endangered spp.
Target Weed
Other Plant Species; same subgenus
Other Subgenera; same genus
Other Genera; same tribe
Plant Families of Economic/Aesthetic Value
Plants Attacked by Relatives of Bioagents
Redrawn from Rees et al., 1995
Host range testing: Centrifugal Phylogenetic Method
Screening Sequence (Wapshere 1989)
NOT IN HOST RANGE
+ -
NOT IN
HOST RANGE
+ -
IN HOST RANGE
NOT IN HOST RANGE
+ - Feeding Test TEST 1 No-Choice: Close Confinement
Adult Oviposition Test #1 TEST 2 No-Choice: Close Confinement
Adult Oviposition Test #2 TEST 3 Multiple Choice: Loose Confinement
Aquatic weed biocontrol in Florida: Alligatorweed – the first attempt
– Origin: Venezuela, Argentina
– First reported in the US in the 1890s
– Caused severe problems in waterways in the southern US in the early 1960s - 66,723 acres of waterways infested in 8 states in 1963
Biological control agents
Alligatorweed thrips (Amynothrips andersoni)
• Released in 1967 • Established, but doesn’t appear
to do much
Agents (con’t) • Alligatorweed stem moth (Arcola malloi) • First released in 1971 • Established throughout Florida, but little impact • In the lower Mississippi River area, it is credited with
providing good control
The big success – Alligatorweed flea
beetle (Agasicles hygrophila)
– First release in 1965 – Excellent control in
Florida – By 1971, alligator
weed was under good control
Hydrilla • Native to Asia, Australia and
eastern Africa • Introduced into Florida as an
aquarium plant • Dumped into a canal near
Tampa in the 1950s • Can grow to 15m in length • Currently the most serious
invasive aquatic plant in the state
Introduced biological control agents
Weevils Bagous affinis – Pakistan
released in 1987 tuber borer not established Bagous hyrillae – Australia
released in 1991 stem borer not established
Flies
Hydrellia balciunasi – Australia released in 1989 leaf miner recovered from a few sites in Texas Hydrellia pakistanae - Pakistan
released in 1987 leaf minor established, found throughout Florida some control reported in Georgia and Texas
Exotic species not intentionally released
• Cricotopus lebetis – Found in 1992 in Crystal River – Studied by Cuda – Larvae feed in apical
meristems – Unknown origin – Appeared to provide some
control in Crystal River – Not host specific
• Parapoynx diminutalis – Moth – Asian origin – In Florida, but not very
effective
Augmentative biological control with grass carp
• Origin: Asia • Sterile triploid developed in 1990s • Stocking rate: 20-255/acre • Live for ~ 10 years
Water hyacinth – Introduced from
South America in to the US in 1884, arrived in Florida in 1890
– The infestation in Florida was estimated at 200,000 acres in 1972
Biological control
• Two beetles released – Neochetina eichhorniae - 1972 – Neochetina bruchi – 1974
• One moth – Niphograpta albiguttalis - 1977
Success? Depends on your point of view
Center et al. 1999. Environemental Management 23: 241-256
Biocontrol agents in managed and unmanaged hydrilla
Water lettuce • Origin of weed uncertain • Found in Florida in 1765
– may have been introduced in ship’s ballast
• The weevil Neohydronomus affinis released in 1987
• Reportedly weakens plants but herbicides still required
Melaleuca – Introduced into Florida in
the late 19th century as an ornamental and to dry up marshes
– Currently infests more than 500,000 acres
– Three biological control agents released
• A weevil - 1997 • A psyllid - 2002 • A gall midge - 2005
Impact of Melaleuca biocontrol Melaleuca density Plant diversity
Rayamaji et al. 2009. Wetlands Ecology and Management
Tropical Soda Apple (Solanum viarum)
• Perennial weed from South America • At maturity, ca. 1m in height • Produces 40,000-50,000 seed per plant • Cattle eat the fruits, but not the prickly
foliage, thereby spreading the plant to new locations
• First reported in Florida in 1988 in Glades Co.
• Estimated to infest 1 million acres in of pastures/rangeland in Florida???
• Losses estimated at $6 -16 million/year, primarily in costs of herbicides and lower cattle stocking rates
1 inch
Biological control of tropical soda apple
• The beetle, Gratiana boliviana was introduced from Paraguay
• Host range testing on 118 plants revealed that G. boliviana would only feed and reproduce on tropical soda apple
• G. boliviana first released in Florida in 2003
Gratiana releases 2003-2011
• Released at ~ 400 locations
• 200,000 beetles released
Gratiana density in Florida, fall 2008
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Height Diameter Fruit
cm o
r num
ber
GB No GB
A
Plant performance at sites with or without G. bolviana damage
B
B
A B
A
Modine ranch – Saint Lucie Co.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Beet
les
Num
ber o
f pla
nts
Date
Plant density meanplts
meangb
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 0.5
1 1.5
2 2.5
3 3.5
4 4.5
5
Bee
tles
Num
ber o
f pla
nts
with
frui
t
Date
Fruit production meanfrt
meangb
July 2006
October 2007
• Invasive plants negatively affect biodiversity and may alter ecological processes
• There are several reasons why some plants may become invasive, including: – hybridization, – novel weapons – lack of natural enemies
• Biological control may be useful for mitigation of invasive plant problems
• Host specificity is the most important attribute of a biological control agent
Summary
QUESTIONS ?