biogas in transport best practice from ... - … · best practice from biogas2020 phuong ninh &...
TRANSCRIPT
BIOGAS IN TRANSPORT
BEST PRACTICE FROM BIOGAS2020
Phuong Ninh & Krzysztof Janko– NTU ApS –
Fredrikstad, 25th April 2018
25-04-2018
What is BioGas2020 and NTU’s role in it?
IDENTIFYING MAIN BARRIERS AND
OPPORTUNITIES
NTU APS COORDINATOR OFWP5 - TRANSPORT
35 PARTNERS 3 COUNTRIES
11 ACTIVITIES SHOWCASING BIOGAS
BENEFITS IN TRANSPORT
25-04-2018
Why biogas in heavy transport?
60-80% REDUCTION OF GHG EMISSIONSCOST-EFFECTIVNESS
LOCAL ECONOMY
25-04-2018
25-04-2018
FLEET MANAGERSCSR/ ENVIRONMENT
SPECIALISTSDECISION-MAKERS
30 CASES PRIVATEPUBLIC
What is the report about?
25-04-2018
WHY?
WHAT? HOW?
What we wanted to find out?
25-04-2018
Sweden’s leading the peloton
Source: NGVA Europe, 2017; Biogass Oslofjord, 2018; gasbiler.info, 2018)
17 20
173461
1487
54000
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Denmark Norway Sweden
Biogas market potential
Natural and biogas stations Natural gas vehicles
25-04-2018
”Rent politisk har man sendt mange signaler om at tung transport skal på gas, men man har intet gjort for at
understøtte det”
”Største udfordring er den manglende infrastruktur”
”Gas er den eneste mulighed som er her og
så virker”
” Vil være first movers. Være de første der fik
erfaring inden for kørsel på biogas.”
Denmark – the incentive desert
25-04-2018
“We want to be a part of the green change”
“Informasjonen bør være mer tilgjengelig enn det
den er i dag. Sammenheng mellom tilgjengelig
kjøretøy, og fyllmuligheter er viktig.”
“A support system to secure a lower, stable and more a more competitive
price on biogas fuel is appreciated.”
Norway – competing alternatives
25-04-2018
”Långsiktiga styrmedel för biodrivmedel och
produktionsstöd (såsom i resten av Europa) istället för användningsstöd”
”Många inom framför allt hemtjänst upplever att det är krångligare att tanka, det tar
längre tid och finns en del oro kring tankning av biogas”
”kvalitén är det stora problemet, viss gas är så dålig att motorerna på lastbilarna börjar
hacka”
”Det är lite svårt att motivera förutom miljöaspekten då
lastbilarna är dyrare i inköp, dyrare service
och dåligt andrahandsvärde”
Sweden – signs of stagnation
25-04-2018
Who is driving the change?
PublicPrivate
Public tasks
Non-public tasks
25-04-2018
Where is the incentive?
Instrument Denmark Norway Sweden
Fuel tax exemptions ✔ ✔Vehicle tax exemptions ✔Other tax exemptions (congestion/parking fee) ✔
Vehicle purchase grants ✔ ✔ ✔RD&D grants ✔ ✔ ✔Investment grants/loans (production and distribution) ✔ ✔ ✔
Subsidising supply of feedstock ✔ ✔ ✔Subsidising fuel sales ✔
SUPPLY
DEMAND
Caveat: This table does NOT represent the current state of legislation in the respective countries. The table presents anoverview of financial instruments that have been used by the three countries in the recent years.
25-04-2018
A bumpy ride for biogas
Drivers
Challenges
Suitability for long-range transport
Environmental and waste regulations
Public procurement
Eco-branding
Total cost of ownership
Lacking infrastructure
Lack of clear political vision and incentives
Lacking awareness
25-04-2018
Light at the end of the tunnel
Opportunities
Growing awareness
The infrastructure the same as for natural gas
Costs should drop over time
Circular economy central to future
economies
Increasing pressure to move away from diesel and towards more sustainable fuels
25-04-2018
What are the takeaways?
“predictable political
environment”
“appropriate cooperation
between private actors and
public authorities”
“the change is still
mostly driven by the
public sector”
“strong commitment
from the leadership”
“a way to brand the
company”
“need to harmonise the
legislation across borders”
Contact:
NTU ApS
Phuong Ninh
Tel.: +45 99 30 00 16
E-mail: [email protected]
Krzysztof Janko
Tel.: +45 99 30 00 02
E-mail: [email protected]
Thank you for attention!
https://www.biogas2020.se