bio hydrogen production
TRANSCRIPT
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 1/22
Proceedings International Hydrogen Energy Congress and Exhibition IHEC 2005
Istanbul, Turkey, 13-15 July 2005
Biohydrogen production from waste materials
Fikret Karg and Ilgi Karapnar Kapdan
Dokuz Eylül University, Department of Environmental Engineering,
Tinaztepe , Buca Izmir, Turkey
[email protected], [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The major biological processes utilized for hydrogen gas production are bio-photolysis of water by
algae, dark fermentation and photofermentation of organic materials, usually carbohydrates by
bacteria. Sequential dark and photo-fermentation process is a rather new approach for biohydrogen
production. One of the major problems in dark and photo-fermentative hydrogen
production is the raw material cost. Carbohydrate rich, nitrogen deficient solid wastes such as
agricultural and food industry wastes and some food industry effluents such as cheese whey, olive
mill and bakers yeast industry wastewaters can be used for hydrogen production by using suitable
bio-process technologies. Utilization of aforementioned wastes for hydrogen production provides
inexpensive energy generation with simultaneous waste treatment. This review article summarizes
bio-hydrogen production from some waste materials. Types of potential waste materials,
bioprocessing strategies, microbial cultures to be used, bio-processing conditions and the recent
developments are discussed
Keywords: bio-hydrogen, waste, bio-processing, dark fermentation, photo-fermentations.
1. INTRODUCTION
Hydrogen is considered as a viable alternative fuel and energy carrier of future. It is a clean fuel
with no CO2 emissions and can easily be used in fuel cells for generation of electricity. Demand on
hydrogen is not limited to utilization as a source of energy which may be used as raw material for
industry. Recent reviews on hydrogen indicated that the worldwide need on hydrogen is increasing
with a growth rate of nearly 10% per year for the time being (Winter, 2005) and contribution of
hydrogen to total energy market will be 8-10% by 2025 (Armor, 1999). Conventional hydrogen
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 2/22
gas production methods are energy intensive processes requiring high temperatures (> 850
o
C).
Electrolysis of water may be the cleanest technology for hydrogen gas production. However,
electrolysis should be used in areas where electricity is inexpensive since electricity costs account
for 80% of the operating cost of H2 production (Armor, 1999). Due to increasing trend of
hydrogen demand, development of cost effective and efficient hydrogen production technologies
has gained significant attention.
In accordance with sustainable development and waste minimization issues, bio-hydrogen gas
production from renewable sources, also known as green technology has received considerable
attention in recent years. Bio-hydrogen production can be realized by anaerobic and
photosynthetic microorganisms. Under anaerobic conditions, hydrogen is producedas a by product
during conversion of organic wastes into organic acids. Photosynthetic processes include algae
which use CO2 and H2O for hydrogen gas production. Some photo-heterotrophic bacteria utilize
organic acids such as acetic, lactic and butyric acids to produce H2 and CO2.
Production of clean energy source and utilization of waste materials make biological hydrogen
production a novel and promising approach to meet the increasing energy needs as a substitute for
fossil fuels. On the basis of these facts, this review focuses on potential use of carbohydrate rich
1 Kargi and Kapdan
wastes as the raw material, microbial cultures, bioprocessing strategies and the recent
developments in bio-hydrogen production.
2. TYPES OF WASTE MATERIALS
The major criteria for the selection of waste materials to be used in bio-hydrogen production are
the availability, cost, carbohydrate content and biodegradability. Simple sugars such as glucose,
sucrose and lactose are readily biodegradable and preferred substrates for hydrogen production.
However pure carbohydrate sources are expensive raw materials for hydrogen production. Major
waste materials which can be used for hydrogen gas production may be summarized as follows.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 3/22
Many agricultural and food industry wastes contain starch and/or cellulose which are rich in terms
of carbohydrate contents. Complex nature of these wastes may adversely affect the
biodegradability. Grinding or delignification by mechanical or chemical means before
fermentation may be required depending on the nature of the agricultural waste. Some
biodegradable carbohydrate containing and non-toxic industrial effluents such as dairy industry,
olive mill, bakers yeast, and brewery wastewaters can be used as raw material for bio-hydrogen
production. Pre-treatment to remove undesirable components and nutritional balancing may be
required for industrial effluents. The waste sludge generated in wastewater treatment plants also
contains large quantities of carbohydrate and proteins which can be used for energy production
such as methane or hydrogen gas.
Starch, cellulose or hemicellulose content of wastes, carbohydrate rich food industry effluents or
waste biological sludge can be further processed to convert the carbohydrates to organic acids and
then to hydrogen gas by using proper bioprocessing technologies. Figure 1 shows schematic
diagram for bio-hydrogen production from food industry wastewaters and agricultural wastes by
two stage, anaerobic dark and photo-fermentations.
Grinding
Delignification
Hydrolysis
Glucose syrup
Wastewater Pretreatment
Dark fermentation
Organic acids
Photo-fermentation
CO2,
H2
CO2, H2
H2
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 4/22
separation
Cellulose and starch
containing wastes
Treated wastewater
Pretreatment
CO2
H2
Figure 1. A schematic diagram for bio-hydrogen production from cellulose/starch containing
agricultural wastes and food industry wastewaters.
3. Bioprocesses for hydrogen gas production
Major bioprocesses utilized for hydrogen gas production can be classified as bio-photolysis of
water by algae, dark-fermentative hydrogen production in the acidogenic phase of anaerobic
digestion and photo-fermentation of organic acids by photosynthetic bacteria. Sequential or
combined dark and photo-fermentations are rather new concepts in bio-hydrogen production.
2Kargi and Kapdan.
3.1. Hydrogen gas production from water by algae and cyanobacteria
Algae split water molecules to hydrogen ion and oxygen via photosynthesis. The generated
hydrogen ions are converted into hydrogen gas by hydrogenase enzyme. Chlamydomonas
reinhardtii is one of the well known hydrogen producing algae (Ghirardi, 2000). Hydrogenase
activity has been detected in green algae, Scenedesmus obliquus (Florin, 2001), in marine green
algae Chlorococcum littorale ( Ueno, 1999) and in Chlorella fusca (Winkler, 2002).
Cyanobacterial hydrogen gas evolution involves nitrogen fixing cultures such heterocystous
filamentous Anabaena cylindrica (Pinto, 2002). However, A. variabilis has received more
attention in recent years because of higher hydrogen production capacity (Tsygankov, 2002,
Masukawa, 2002). At the present time the rate of hydrogen production by Anabaena sp is
considerably lower than that obtained by dark or photo-fermentations.
The algal hydrogen production could be considered as an economical and sustainable method in
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 5/22
terms of water utilization as a renewable resource and CO2 consumption as oneof the air
pollutants. However, strong inhibition effect of generated oxygen on hydrogenase enzyme, low
hydrogen production potential and no waste utilization are the limitations of the process.
Therefore, dark fermentation and photo-fermentations are considered to be more advantageous
due
to simultaneous waste treatment and hydrogen gas production.
3.2. Hydrogen gas production by dark fermentation
3.2.1. Type of organisms and conditions
Many anaerobic organisms can produce hydrogen from carbohydrate containing organic wastes.
The organisms belonging to the genus Clostridium such as C. buytricum (Yokoi, 2001), C.
pasteurianum (Liu, 2004, Lin and Lay, 2004), C. bifermentants (Wang, 2003-a) are obligate
anaerobes and spore forming organisms. Hydrogen production capacity of anaerobic facultative
bacterial culture Enterobacter aerogenes has been widely studied (Tanisho and Ishiwata, 1994,
1995). Recently a hydrogen producing bacterial strain Klebisalle oxytoca HP1 was isolated from
hot springs with maximal hydrogen production rate at 35
o
C (Minnan, 2005). T.
thermosaccharolyticum, (Shin, 2004), Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 (Kanai, 2005) and
Clostridium thermolacticum (Collet, 2004) are the thermophilic hydrogen producers.
The optimum pH for the maximum hydrogen yield or specific hydrogen production rate could
range from pH=4.5 to pH=8.0 (Liu, 2004, Collet, 2004,Shin, 2004, Fang ,2002). The final pH in
anaerobic hydrogen production is reported as around 4.0-4.8 regardless of initial pH (Yokoi, 2001,
Liu, 2004). Reducing agents such as argon are used to remove trace amounts of oxygen present in
the medium. Utilization of such reducing agents is relatively expensive and uneconomical for
industrial production of hydrogen gas. Mixed culture of facultative anaerobe E. aerogenes and
Clostridum sp have been suggested to overcome use of reducing agents (Yokoi, 1998-a,). The
major products in hydrogen production by anaerobic dark fermentation of carbohydrates are
acetic, butyric, lactic and propionic acids (Collet, 2004, Lay, 2001, Lin and Lay, 2004). Ethanol
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 6/22
may be produced depending on the environmental conditions (Collet 2004, Lin and Lay, 2004).
3.2.2. Type of substrates
3.2.2.1. Use of simple sugars
Glucose is an easily biodegradable carbon source, present in most of the industrial effluents and
can be obtained abundantly from agricultural wastes. Theoretically bioconversion of 1 mol of
glucose yields 12 moles of hydrogen gas (H2). According to reaction stoichiometry, bioconversion
of 1 mole of glucose into acetate yields 4 mol H2 /mol glucose, but only 2 mol H2 /mol glucose is
formed when butyrate is the end product. The highest hydrogen yield obtained from glucose is
around 2.0-2.2 mol/mol (Table 1). Production of butyrate rather than acetate or partial
3Kargi and Kapdan
biodegradation of glucose may be one of the reasons for deviations from the theoretical yield
(Fang and Liu, 2002). Batch and continuous hydrogen gas production from sucrose has been
widely studied. The yield from sucrose varies between 1.5 mol/mol sucrose and 6.0 mol/mol
sucrose depending on bioprocessing conditions, microbial culture and concentration of sucrose
(Table 1).
Table 1. Rates and yields of bio-hydrogen production from glucose by batch dark-fermentations.
Organism SHPR VHPR H2 Yield References
H2 production from glucose*
Klebsielle oxytoca HP1 9.6mmol /g DW h 87.5 ml/L h 1 Minnan et.al. 2005
E. cloacae IIT-BT 08 447 ml/L h 2.2 Kumar et al.2000
Mixed culture 20 mmol/g VSS h 1.1 Chen et al. 2000
Clostridia sp 14.2 mmol/g VSS h 359 mmol/Ld 1.7 Lin and Chang 2004
Mixed culture 191 ml /g VSS h 2.1 Fang et al. 2002
H2 production from sucrose
+
Klebsielle oxytoca HP1 8.0 mmol/g DW h 1.5 Minnan et al. 2005
C. pasteurium 4.58 mmol/g VSS h 270 mmol/L d 4.8 Lin and Lay 2004
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 7/22
E. cloacae IIT-BT 08 29.5 mmol/g DW h 660 ml/ L h 6 Kumar et al. 2000
Mixed culture 340 ml/g VSS h 5.10 L/h L 2.1 Lee et al. 2004
Klebsiella oxytocaHP1 15.2 mmol/g DW h 350 ml/L h 3.6 Minnan et al. 2005
H2 yield *mol/mol glucose; H2 yield
+
mol/mol sucrose; SHPR: specific hydrogen production rate;
VHPR: volumetric hydrogen production rate.
3.2.2.2. Use of complex charbohydrates
Starch containing materials are abundant in nature and have great potential to be used as a
carbohydrate source for hydrogen production. According to reaction stoichiometry, eachgram of
starch produces a maximum of 553 ml of hydrogen with acetate as a by-product (Zhang, 2003).
However the yield may be lower than that value because of utilization of substrate for cell
synthesis. Table 2 summarizes the rates and yields of hydrogen production for batch and
continuous operations when starch was used as the substrate. The maximum specific hydrogen
production rate was 237 ml H2/g VSS.d when edible corn starch was used as the substrate by C.
pasteurianum (Liu and Shen, 2004). Zang et al. (2003) obtained higher specific yield of 480 ml
H2/gVSS.d with 4.6 g/L starch concentration by using a mixed sludge. Hydrogen yield obtained in
long term repeated batch operations was 2.4 mol H2/ mol glucose with 2 % starch residue
containing wastewater by the mixed culture of C. butyricum and E. aerogenes (Yokoi, 2001).
Table 2. The rates and yields of bio-hydrogen production from starch by dark-fermentations.
Organism SHPR VHPR H2 Yield References
Thermophilic 15.2 ml/g VSS h 1.9 ml/h 92 ml/ g starch Zhang et al. 2003
C. pasteurianum 9.9 ml/gVSS h 4.2 ml/ h 106 ml/ g starch Liu et al. 2004
Mixed culture 97.5 ml/g VSS h 1497 L/m
3
d 1.29 L/g starch COD Lay 2000
C. butyricum+ 1300 ml/L h 2.6 mol/mol glucose Yokoi et al.1998-a
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 8/22
E. aerogenes
T. kodakaraensis 14.0mmol/g DW h 9.46 mmol/L h 3.33 mol/mol starch Kanai et al.2005
Cellulose is the major constitute of plant biomass and highly available in agricultural wastes and
industrial effluents such as pulp/paper and food industry. Hydrogen gas production potential from
4Kargi and Kapdan.
microcrystalline cellulose was determined as 2.18 mol H2/mol cellulose with 12.5 g/l cellulose
concentration at mesophilic conditions (Lay, 2001). Liu et al. (2003) reported the maximum
hydrogen yield of 102 ml/g cellulose which is only 18% of the theoretical yield. Low yield was
explained as partial hydrolysis of cellulose. Utilization of cellulose hydrolysate provided 4.10
mmol /h H2 production rate (Taguchi, 1996). Similarly, production of hydrogen gas was higher
from hydrolysate of Avicel cellulose or xylan than that of pure xylose or glucose (Taguchi, 1995).
3.2.2.4. Use of food industry wastes and wastewater
Food industry wastes constitute a major fraction of the municipal solid wastes. High carbohydrate
content in form of simple sugars, starch and cellulose makes the solid food wastes a potential
feedstock for biological hydrogen production. The problem with the food waste is the variations in
carbohydrate and protein types and the contents in the mixture. Each component requires different
environmental and bioprocessing conditions for hydrogen gas production. Table 3 summarizes the
hydrogen gas production from different wastewaters and solid wastes.
The biological hydrogen production from organic fraction of municipal solid wastes (OFMSW)
provided 43 ml/ g VSS. h specific production rate and 125 ml /g TVS. h production potential (Lay,
1999). Kim et al. (2004) obtained 111.2 ml H2/ g VSS. h when food waste was used as sole
substrate. Similarly, hydrogen production potential of carbohydrate-rich high solid organic waste
(HSOW) was 20 times larger than those of fat rich HSOW and protein rich HSOW (Lay, 2003).
The highest production yield was 0.21 L H2/ g COD from potato processing wastewater compared
to confectioners, apple industrial effluents and domestic wastewater (Ginkel, 2005). The maximum
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 9/22
rate of hydrogen production from molasses in continuous operation with E. aerogenes was 36
mmol /L h (Tanisho,1994). Immobilized cultures resulted in 2.2 mol H2/mol sugar (Tanisho,
1995).
Biosolids (sludges) from wastewater treatment plants contain large amounts of polysaccharides
and proteins. Hydrogen yields of 1.2 mg H2/g COD (Wang, 2003-b) and 0.6 mol/kg COD (Wang,
2004) were reported when sludge was used as the raw material. However, higher hydrogen yields
(15 mg H2/g COD) were obtained from the filtrate (Wang, 2003-b).
Table 3. The rates and yields of bio-hydrogen production from different waste materials by dark
fermentation.
Carbon Source SHPR VHPR YP/S References
Yield coefficient
OFMSW 16.8 ml/g VSS h 117 ml/g TVS h 150 ml/g OFMSW Lay et al. 1999
Food waste 12 ml//g VSS h 1.8 mol/mol hexose Shin et al. 2004
Potato Ind. WW 2.8 L/L WW Ginkel et.al. 2005
Apple Ind. WW 0.9 L/LWW Ginkel et.al. 2005
Molasses 36 mmol/l culture h 138 ml /L h 1.5 mol/mol sucrose Tanisho et al.1994
Rice winery WW 389 ml/g VSS h 159 ml/L h 2.14 mol/mol hexose Yu et al. 2002
Sludge Filtrate 15 mg/ g COD Wang et al. 2003-b
Starch residue 2.4 mol/mol glucose Yokoi et al. 2001
Starch residue 2.7 mol/mol glucose Yokoi et al. 2002
OFMSW: Organic fraction of solid waste
3.3. Hydrogen gas production by photo-fermentations
3.3.1. Types of organisms and the conditions
Some photo-heterotrophic bacteria are capable of converting organic acids (acetic, lactic, butyric)
to hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) under anaerobic conditions in the presence of light.
5Kargi and Kapdan
Therefore, the organic acids produced during the acidogenic phase of anaerobic digestion of
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 10/22
organic wastes can be converted to H2 and CO2 by some photosynthetic anaerobic bacteria.
Hydrogen gas production capabilities of some purple photosynthetic bacteria such as Rhodobacter
spheroides (Koku, 2002, Federov, 1998, Erolu, 1999), Rhodobacter capsulatus (He, 2005, Fang,
2005), Rhodovulum sulfidophilum W-1S (Maeda, 2003) and Rhodopseudomonas palustris
(Barbosa, 2001) have been investigated to some extent. Photoproduction of hydrogen from CO or
other organic acids by carbon-monoxide dependent dehydrogenase (CODH) enzyme containing
cultures such as Rhodospirillum rubrum (Najafpour, 2004) and Rodopseudomonos palsutris P4
has also been reported (Oh, 2004).
The hydrogen production takes place under anaerobic conditions with light illumination at
pHopt=7.0 and T=30-35
0
C (Federov 1998, Erolu 1999). The organisms prefer organic acids as
carbon source such as acetic (Fang, 2005), butyric (Fang, 2005), propionic (Shi and Yu, 2004),
lactic (He, 2005) and malic acid (Erolu, 1999). Table 5 summarizes the yields and the rates of
hydrogen production from different organic acids by the photo-fermentative organisms.
Table 4. Rates and yields of bio-hydrogen production from organic acids by photo-fermentations.
Organic Organism Conv Eff. LCE
a
SHPR VHPR References
Acid
Acetate Rhodopseudomonas 72.8% 0.9% 25.2 ml H2/L h Barbosa et al.2001
R. palustris 14.8% 0.1% 2.2 ml H2/L h Barbosa et al.2001
R. capsulata 76.5% 22 ml/g VSS h 0.88 ml/h Fang et al. 2005
Lactate R. palustris 12.6% 0.5% 9.1 ml H2/L h Barbosa et al.2001
R. sphaeroides RV 80% 75 ml/g DW h 1.5 L/L d Fascetti et al. 1995
R.sphaeroides GL-1 86% 0.2 ml/ml PU matrix h Federov et al.1998
Butyrate Rhodopseudomonas 8.4% 0.3% 7.6 ml H2/L h Barbosa et al.2001
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 11/22
R. capsulata 67.6% 32 ml/g VSS h 1.28 ml/h Fang et al. 2005
Malate R. palustris 36% 0.3% 5.8 ml H2/L h Barbosa et al.2001
R. sphaeroides 2.4ml/ g DW h 12 ml/L h Erolu et al. 1999]
R. sphaeroides 35-45% 18 ml/ g DW h 5 ml H2/L h Koku et al. 2002
a
: Light conversion efficiency;
Nitrogenase is the key enzyme that catalyzes hydrogen gas production by photosynthetic bacteria.
Since nitrogenase enzyme is inhibited in the presence of oxygen, ammonia or at high N/C ratios,
the process requires ammonium limited and oxygen free conditions (Koku, 2003). The metabolism
shifts to utilization of organic substance for cell synthesis rather than hydrogen production in the
presence of high nitrogen concentrations resulting in excess biomass growth and reduction in light
diffusion (Fascetti, 1995, Oh, 2004). Light intensity affects the performance of photo-fermentation
Increasing light intensity has a stimulatory affect on hydrogen yield and production rate, but has an
adverse effect on the light conversion efficiency (Barbosa, 2001). Hydrogen production under dark
conditions is usually lower than that of the illuminated conditions (Koku, 2003, Oh, 2004).
However alternating 14 h light and 10 h dark cycles yielded slightly higher hydrogen production
rates and cell concentrations as compared to continuous illumination (Koku, 2003).
3.3.2. Types of substrates
Utilization of industrial effluents for hydrogen gas production by photosynthetic bacteria is
possible. The major problems in hydrogen gas production from industrial effluents are the color of
wastewaters, which could reduce the light penetration and high ammonia concentration which
reduces the hydrogen productivity. Moreover, high organic matter content (COD) and presence of
some toxic compounds in industrial effluents may require pre-treatment before hydrogen gas
production.
6Kargi and Kapdan.
Table 5 summarizes hydrogen production studies from some food industry wastewaters by
photofermentation. Photo-production of hydrogen from pre-treated sugar refinery wastewater
(SRWW)
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 12/22
resulted in hydrogen production rate of 3.8 ml/l.h at 32
o
C in batch operation with 20% diluted
SRWW. Addition of malic acid (20 g/L) into SRWW enhanced the production rate to 5 ml/l.h.
(Yeti, 2000). High dilutions (3-4%) of olive mill waste (OMW) were necessary to alter the
inhibitory effects of high organic content and dark color of OMW. 2% dilution resulted in the
highest hydrogen production of 13.9 L H2/L WW with R. sphaeroides OU 001 where around 35%
COD reduction was observed (Erolu, 2004). Tofu wastewater is a carbohydrate and protein-rich
effluent. Hydrogen yield from tofu wastewater (1.9 L/L wastewater at 30
o
C) was comparable to
the yield from glucose (3.6 L/ L wastewater) by immobilized R. sphaeroides RV. No ammonia
inhibition (2mM) was observed and 41% of TOC was removed (Zhu, 1999). 50% dilution of the
wastewater increased the yield to 4.32 L/L wastewater and TOC removal efficiency to 66% (Zhu,
2002). The hydrogen gas production from potato starch, sugar cane, juice and whey by using
Rhodopseudomonas sp.have been investigated and sugar cane juice yielded the maximum level of
hydrogen production (45 ml/mg DW. h) (Singh, 1994).
Table 5. The rates and yields of bio-hydrogen production from food industry wastewaters by
photo-fermentations.
Wastewater Organism H2 Yield HPR Ref
Sugar Refinery WW R.sphaeroides OU 001 13.44 L/mol C 5 ml/ L culture h Yeti et al. 2000
Sugar Refinery WW R.sphaeroides OU 001 11.67 L/mol C 3 ml/ L culture h Yeti et al. 2000
Olive Mill WW R.sphaeroides OU 001 4ml/L culture h Erolu et al. 2004
Tofu WW R.sphaeroides 0.24 ml/ mg 2.1 L/ h m
2
gel Zhu et al. 1999
carbohydrate
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 13/22
Tofu WW R.sphaeroides 15.9 ml/L h Zhu et al. 1999
HPR: Hydrogen production rate
3.3.3. Photo-bioreactors for bio- hydrogen production
The major types of photo-bioreactors developed for hydrogen production are tubular, flat panel
and bubble column reactors. High illuminations cause lower light conversion yields, but higher
hydrogen production rates. 9.23% maximum energy conversion efficiency was obtained by using
light-induced and diffused photo-bioreactor (IDPBR) at 300 W/m
2
light intensity and the width of
the culture significantly affected the productivity (El-Shishtawy, 1997). Similar results were
observed by Nakada et al. (1995) in a photo-bioreactor composed of four compartments aligned
along the light penetration axis. The efficiency of the conversion of light to hydrogen increased
with the depth in the reactor and 1 cm depth yielded the highest efficiency.
Tredici type multi-tubular photo-bioreactors (Figure 2-a) was used for hydrogen gas production in
the presence and absence of light by using Spirulina (Benemann, 2000). A modification of tubular
reactor was developed by Modigell as a modular outdoor photo-bioreactor (Figure 2-b)
(Modigella, 1998). The hydrogen production rate from lactate reached 2 L/m
2
h with a light
conversion efficiency of 2% in outdoor experiments. A pneumatically agitated photobioreactor
(Figure 2-c) and a novel flat-panel airlift photo-bioreactor with baffles (Figure 2-d) have been
developed for cultivation of Rhodopseudomonas (Hoekaman, 2002) and Chlorella vulgaris
(Degen, 2001), respectively. Hydrogen gas production by using these photo-bioreactors has not
been examined yet.
In relating to solar hydrogen production, the light conversion efficiency could be less during midday
because of high light intensity. In addition, a delay of 2-4 hours was observed in maximum
hydrogen production rate after the highest light intensity at noon (Miyake, 1999). Utilization of
7Kargi and Kapdan
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 14/22
light shade bands on photo-biorecators improved the light conversion efficiency (Wakayama,
2002).
a b
c d
Figure 2. Some configurations for photo-bioreactors used for hydrogen production. a.
Photo-bioreactor with gas recirculation (Hoekeman, 2002), (1); Membrane gas
pump; (2): gas bag for collection of produced gas; (3) two 1 L pressure vessels; (4)
pressure valve; (5) mass flow controller; (6) condenser; (7) pH/redox electrode; b.
Flat panel airlift (FPA) photo-bioreactor; ( Degen 2001). c. Multi-tubular
(Tredici) photo-bioreactor ( Benemann 2000);d. A modular outdoor photobioreactor ( Modigella,
1998).
3.4. Hydrogen gas production by sequential dark and photo-fermentation
Sequential dark and photo fermentation is a rather new approach in biological hydrogen gas
production. Two-stage system has certain advantages over single stage dark-fermentation or
photo-fermentation processes. The effluent of dark fermentation in hydrogen production provides
sufficient amount of organic acids for the photo- fermentation. Therefore, the limitation by the
organic acid availability would be eliminated. Higher hydrogen production yields can be obtained
when two systems are combined (Yokoi, 1998-b, 2002). Further utilization of organic acids by
photo-fermentative bacteria could provide better effluent quality in terms of COD. However, the
system should be well controlled to provide optimum media composition and environmental
conditions for the two microbial components of the process (Yokoi, 2001, 2002). The ammonia
concentration in the effluent of anaerobic fermentation should not be at the inhibitory level for the
photosynthetic bacteria (Fascetti, 1998). Dilution and neutralization of dark fermentation effluents
are required before photo-fermentation to adjust the organic acid concentration and the pH to 7 for
the optimal performance of photosynthetic bacteria (Kawaguchi, 2001).
8Kargi and Kapdan.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 15/22
Biohydrogen production by co-culture of anaerobic and photosynthetic bacteria in single stage has
also been studied. Yokoi obtained higher hydrogen production yield (4.5 mol/mol glucose) by
coculture of C. butryricum and Rhodobacter sp. as compared to single stage dark fermentation (1.9
mol/mol glucose) and sequential two step fermentation (3.7 mol/mol glucose) of starch ( Yokoi
1998-b). Similarly, higher hydrogen yields from different substrates were reported by co-cultures
of R. marinum and V. fluvialis as compared to R. marinum alone (Ike, 1999). Better hydrogen
yield (60%), was observed in combined fermentation by Lactobacillus amylovous and R. marinum
from algae biomass in comparison to sequential two-stage fermentation (45%) (Kawaguchi, 2001).
In addition, pH of the mixed fermentation remained around pH=7 which is considered as an
advantage over the two stage fermentation process. However, the differences in organic acid
production/consumption rates and therefore, potential accumulation of organic acids in the media
are the major problems.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Hydrogen is considered as the energy for future since it is a clean energy source with high
energy content as compared to hydrocarbon fuels and not readily available in nature as fossil fuels.
Therefore, new processes need to be developed for cost effective production of hydrogen.
Biological methods offer distinct advantages for hydrogen production over chemical methods such
as operation under mild conditions and specific conversions. However, the raw material cost is one
of the major limitations for bio-hydrogen production. Utilization of some carbohydrate rich, starch
or cellulose containing solid wastes and/or some food industry wastewaters is an attractive
approach for bio-hydrogen production. Among the various methods used for bio-hydrogen
production sequential or combined bioprocesses of dark and photo-fermentations seem to be the
most attractive approach resulting in high hydrogen yields for hydrogen production from
carbohydrate rich wastes and simultaneous waste treatment.
The major problems in bio-hydrogen production from wastes are the low rates and yields of
hydrogen formation and therefore large reactor volume requirements. This problem may be
overcome by selecting and using more effective organisms or mixed cultures, developing more
efficient processing schemes, optimizing the environmental conditions, improving the light
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 16/22
utilization efficiency and developing more efficient photo-bioreactors. Considerable research and
development studies are needed to improve the state of the art in bio-hydrogen production.
REFERENCES
Armor, J.N. The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H2. Applied Catalysis A: General,
176, (1999), 159-176.
Barbosa, M.J., Rocha, J.M.S., Tramper, J, Wijffels, R.H.: Acetate as a carbon source for hydrogen
production by photosynthetic bacteria, J Biotechnol., 85, (2001), 25-33.
Benemann, J.R., Rreport to the US Department of Energy Hydrogen Program. Biohydrogen
Production. Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, University of Hawaii 2000.
Chen, C.C., Lin, C.Y.: Using sewage sludge as seed in an anaerobic hydrogen producing reactor.
Proceedings 25th Wastewater Treatment Technology Conference, Yun-Lin Taiwan December
1-2, 2000, 368-372.
Collet, C., Adler, N., Schwitzguébel, J.P., Péringer, P.: Hydrogen production by Clostridium
thermolacticum during continuous fermentation of lactose, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 29,
(2004), 1479-1485.
Degen, J., Uebele, A., Retze, A., Schmid-Staiger, U., Trösch, W.: A novel airlift photobioreactor
with baffles for improved light utilization through the flashing light effects, J Biotechnol., 92,
(2001), 89-94.
El- Shishtawy,R.M.A., Kawasaki, S., Morimoto, M.: Biological H2 production using a novel
lightinduced and diffused photobioreactor, Biotechnol. Techniques, 11, (1997), 403-407.
Erolu,E.,Gündüz,U., Yücel, M., Türker, L., Erolu, .: Photobiological hydrogen production from
olive mill wastewater as sole substrate sources, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,29,(2004),163-171.
9Kargi and Kapdan
Erolu, ., Aslan, K., Gündüz, U., Yücel, M., Türker, L.: Substrate consumption rate for hydrogen
production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides in a column photobioreactor, J Biotechnol., 70, (1999),
103-113.
Fang, H.H.P., Liu, H., Zhang, T.: Phototrophic hydrogen production from acetate and butyrate in
wastewater, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 30,( 2005) 785-793.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 17/22
Fang, H.H.P., Liu, H.: Effect of pH on hydrogen production from glucose by mixed culture,
Bioresource Technol., 82, (2002), 87-93.
Fascetti, E., DAddario, E., Todini, O., Robertiello, A.: Photosynthetic hydrogen evolution with
volatile organic acid derived from the fermentation of source selected municipal wastes, Inter J
of Hydrog Energy, 23, (1998), 753-760.
Fascetti, E,, Todini, O.: Rhodobacter sphaeroids RV cultivation and hydrogen production in a one
and two stage chemostat, Appl Microbial Biotechnol,44, (1995),300-305.
Federov, A.S., Tsygankov, A.A., Rao, K.K., Hall, D.O.: Hydrogen photoproduction by
Rhodobacter sphaeroides immobilized on polyurethane foam, Biotechnol. Letters,;20, (1998),
1007-1009.
Florin, L., Tsokoglou, A., Happe, T. :A novel type of iron hydrogenase in the green alga
Scenedesmus obliquus is linked to the photosynthetic electron transport chain, Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 276, (2001), 6125-6132.
Ghirardi, M.L., Zhang, L., Lee, J.W., Flynn, T., Seibert, M., Greenbaum, E., Melis, A.:
Microalgae: a green source of renewable H2, TIBTECH, 18, (2000), 506-511.
Ginkel, S.V., Oh, S.E., Logan, B.E.: Biohydrogen production from food processing and domestic
wastewaters, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 2005. In press.
He, D., Bultel, Y., Magnin, J.P., Roux, C., Willison, J.C.: Hydrogen photosynthesis by
Rhodobacter capsulatus and its coupling to PEM fuel cell, J Power Sources, 141,(2005), 19-23.
Hoekeman, S., Bijmans, M., Janssen, M., Tramper, J., Wijffels, R.H.: A pneumatically agitated
flat-panel photobioreactor with gas re-circulation: anaerobic photoheterotrophic cultivation of a
purple non-sulfur bacterium, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 27, (2002), 1331-1338.
Ike, A., Murakawa, T., Kawaguchi, H., Hirata, K., Miyamoto, K. :Photoproduction of hydrogen
from raw starch using a halophilic bacterial community, J Bioscience Bioeng, 88, (1999),72-77.
Kanai, T., Imanaka, H., Nakajima, A., Uwamori, K., Omori, Y., Fukui, T., Atomi, H., Imanaka. T.:
Continuous hydrogen production by the hyperthermophilic archaeon, Thermococcus
kodakaraensis KOD1, J Biotechnol., 116, (2005), 271-282.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 18/22
Kawaguchi, H., Hashimoto, K., Hirata, K., Miyamoto, K.: H2 production from algal biomass by
mixed culture of Rhodobium marinum A-501 and Lactobacillus amylovorus,, J Bioscience
Bioeng., 91, (2001), 277-282.
Kim, S.H., Han, S.K., Shin, H.S.: Feasibility of biohydrogen production by anaerobic co-digestion
of food waste and sewage sludge, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 29, (2004), 1607-1616.
Koku, H., Erolu, ., Gündüz, U., Yücel, M., Türker, L.: Aspects of metabolism of hydrogen
production by Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,27, (2002),1315-1329.
Koku, H,, Erolu, ., Gündüz, U., Yücel, M., Türker, L.: Kinetics of biohydrogen production by
the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter spheroids O.U. 001, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 28,
(2003), 381-388.
Kumar, N.,Das, D.: Enhancement of hydrogen production by Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08,
Process Biochem., 35, (2000), 589-593.
Lay, J.J., Fan, K.S., Chang, J., Ku, C.H.: Influence of chemical nature of organic waste on their
conversion of hydrogen by heat-shock digested sludge, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 28, ( 2003),
1361-1367.
Lay, J.J., Lee, Y.J., Noike, T.: Feasibility of biological hydrogen production from organic fraction
of municipal solid waste, Water Res., 33, (1999), 2579-2586.
10Kargi and Kapdan.
Lay, J.J.: Biohydrogen generation by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation of microcrystalline
cellulose, Biotechnol. Bioeng.,74, (2001), 281-287.
Lay, J.J.: Modeling and Optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen,
Biotechnol. Bioeng., 68, (2000), 269-278.
Lee, K.S., Lo, Y.S., Lo, Y.C., Lin, P.J., Chang, J.S.: Operating strategies for biohydrogen
production with high-rate anaerobic granular sludge bed bioreactor, Enzyme Microbial
Technol, 35, (2004), 605-612.
Lin, C.Y., Chang, R.C.: Fermentative hydrogen production at ambient temperature, Inter J of
Hydrog Energy, 29, (2004), 715-720.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 19/22
Lin, C.Y., Lay, C.H.: Carbon/nitrogen ratio effect on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed
microflora, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 29, (2004), 41-45.
Liu, G., Shen, J.: Effects of culture medium and medium conditions on hydrogen production from
starch using anaerobic bacteria, J Bioscience Bioeng., 98, (2004), 251-256.
Liu, H., Zhang, T., Fang, H.P.P.:Thermophilic H2 production from cellulose containing
wastewater, Biotechnol. Letters, 25, (2003), 365-369.
Maeda, I., Miyasaka, H., Umeda, F., Kawase, M., Yagi, K.: Maximization of hydrogen production
ability in high-density suspension of Rhodovulum sulfidophilum cells using intracellular poly(
3-hydroxcbutyrate) as sole substrate, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 81, (2003), 474-481.
Masukawa, H., Mochimaru. M., Sakurai, H.: Hydrogenase and photobiological hydrogen
production utilizing nitrogenase enzyme system in cyanobacteria, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,;
27, (2002), 1471-1474.
Minnan, L., Jinli, H., Xiaobin, W., Huijuan, X., Jinzao, C., Chuannan, L., Fengzhang, Z.,
Liangshu, X.: Isolation and characterization of a high H2-producing strain Klebsialle oxytoca
HP1 from a hot spring, Research in Microbiol. ,156, (2005), 76-81.
Miyake, J., Wakayama, T., Schnackenberg, J.S., Arai, T., Asada, Y.: Simulation of daily sunlight
illumination pattern for bacterial photo-hydrogen production, J Bioscience Bioeng., 88, (1999),
659-663.
Modigell, M., Holle, N.: Reactor development for a biosolar hydrogen production process,
Renewable Energy, 14, (1998), 421-426.
Najafpour, G., Younesi, H., Mohammed, A.R.: Effect of organic substrate on hydrogen production
from synthesis gas using Rhodospirillum rubrum in batch culture, Biochem. Eng. J., 21,
(2004),123-130.
Nakada,E.,Asada,Y., Arai, T., Miyake, J.: Light penetration into cell suspensions of photosynthetic
bacteria and relation to hydrogen production, J Ferment. Bioeng., 80, (1995), 53-57.
Oh, Y.K., Scol, E.H., Kim, M.S., Park, S.: Photoproduction of hydrogen from acetate by a
chemoheterotrophic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris P4, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 29,
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 20/22
(2004), 1115-1121.
Pinto, F.A.L., Troshina, O., Lindbald, P.: A brief look at three decades of research on
cyanobacterial hydrogen evolution, Inter J of Hyrdog Energy, 27, (2002), 1209-1215.
Shi, X.Y., Yu, H.Q.: Hydrogen production from propionate by Rhodopseudomonas capsulate,
Appl Biochem. Biotechnol.,117, (2004), 143-154.
Shin, H.S., Youn, J.H., Kim, S.H.: Hydrogen production from food waste in anaerobic mesophilic
and thermophilic acidogenesis, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 29, (2004), 1355-1363.
Singh,S.P.,Srivastava,S.C.,Pandey,K.D.:Hydrogen-production by Rhodopseudomonas at the
expense of vegetable starch, sugar juice and whey,Inter J of Hydrog Energy,19,(1994),437-440.
Taguchi, F., Yamada, K., Hasegawa, K., Saito-Taki, T., Hara, K.:Continuous hydrogen production
by Clostridium sp. strain no. 2 from cellulose hydrolysate in an aqueous two-phase system, J
Ferment. Bioeng., 82, (1996),180-83.
11Kargi and Kapdan
Taguchi, F., Mizukami, N., Yamada, K., Hasegawa, K., Saito-Taki, T.: Direct conversion of
cellulosic materials to hydrogen by Clostridium sp. strain no. 2, Enzyme Microbial Technol.,17,
(1995), 147-150.
Tanisho, S., Ishiwata, Y.: Continuous hydrogen production from molasses by bacterium
Enterobacter aerogenes, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 19, (1994), 807-812.
Tanisho, S., Ishiwata, Y.: Continuous hydrogen production from molasses by fermentation using
urethane foam as a support of flocks, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,20, (1995), 541-544.
Tsygankov, A.A., Federov, A.S., Kosourov, S.N., Rao, K.K.: Hydrogen Production by
cyanobacteria in an automated outdoor photobioreactor under anaerobic condition,
Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 80, (2002),777-783.
Ueno, Y., Kurano, N., Miyachi, S.: Purification and characterization of hydrogenase from the
marine green alga, Chlorococcum littorale, FEBS Letters,443, (1999) 144-148.
Wakayama, T., Miyake, J.: Light shade bands for the improvement of solar hydrogen production
efficiency by Rhodobacter sphaeroides RV, Inter J of Hydrog Energy, 27, (2002), 1495-1500.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 21/22
Wang, C.C., Chang, C.W., Chu, C.P., Lee, D.J., Chang, B.V., Liao, C.S.: Producing hydrogen
from wastewater sludge by Clostridum bifermentans, J Biotechnol.,102,(2003-a), 83-92.
Wang, C.C., Chang, C.W., Chu, C.P., Lee, D.J., Chang, B.V., Liao, C.S., Tay, J.H.: Using filtrate
of waste biosolids to effectively produce bio-hydrogen by anaerobic fermentation, Water Res.,
37, (2003-b), 2789-2793
Wang, C.C., Chang, C.W., Chu, C.P., Lee, D.J., Chang, B.V., Liao, C.S.; Efficient production of
hydrogen from wastewater sludge, J Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.,79, (2004), 426-427.
Winkler, M., Heil, B., Heil, B., Happe, T. Isolation and molecular characterization of the [Fe]-
hydrogenase from the unicellular green alga Chlorella fusca, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
(BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression,1576, (2002),:330-334.
Winter, C.J.: Into the hydrogen energy economymilestones, Inter. J of Hydrog Energy, 30,
(2005), 681-685.
Yetis, M., Gündüz, U., Erolu, ., Yücel, M., Türker, L.: Photoproduction of hydrogen from sugar
refinery wastewater by Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001, Inter J of Hydrog
Energy,25,(2000),1035-1041.
Yokoi, H., Maki, R., Hirose, J., Hayashi, S.: Microbial production of hydrogen from starch
manufacturing wastes, Biomass Bioener.,22, (2002), 89-395.
Yokoi, H., Mori, S., Hirose, J., Hayashi, S., Takasaki, Y.: H2 production from starch by mixed
culture of Clostridium butyricum and Rhodobacter sp M-19, Biotechnol. Letters, 20,(1998),
895-899.
Yokoi, H., Saitsu, A.S., Uchida, H., Hirose, J., Hayashi, S., Takasaki, Y.: Microbial hydrogen
production from sweet potato starch residue, J Bioscience Bioeng., 91, (2001), 58-63.
Yokoi, H., Tokushige, T., Hirose, J., Hayashi, S., Takasaki, Y.: H2 production from starch by
mixed culture of Clostridium buytricum and Enterobacter aerogenes, Biotechnol. Letters,20,
(1998), 143-147.
Yu, H.,Zhu,Z.,Hu,W.,Zhang,H.:Hydrogen production from rice winery wastewater in an uplow
anaerobic reactor by mixed anaerobic cultures, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,27,(2002), 1359-1365.
8/8/2019 Bio Hydrogen Production
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bio-hydrogen-production 22/22
Zhang, T., Liu, H., Fang, H.H.P.: Biohydrogen production from starch in wastewater under
thermophilic conditions, J Environ. Manag.,69,(2003),149-156.
Zhu, H., Suzuki, T., Tsygankov, A.A., Asada, Y., Miyake, J.: hydrogen production from tofu
wastewater by Rhodobacter sphaeroides immobilized agar gels, Inter J of Hydrog Energy,24,
(1999), 305-310.
Zhu, H., Ueda, S., Asada, Y., Miyake, J.: Hydrogen production as a novel process of wastewater
treatment studies on tofu wastewater with entrapped R. sphaeroides and mutagenesis, Inter J
of Hydrog Energy, 27,(2002),27, 1349-1357.
12