bila spur report final

Upload: sunil-bose

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    1/32

    Pavement design of Heavy duty pavement of coal haul road in coalmines area Gevra Bilaspur

    General: India is rich in natural resources and these resources are both superficial andunderneath the earth. While forest are the main superficial assets, minerals fuels

    and precious metals constitute the assets underground. All these resources areuseful in building our life and hence continued efforts are being made to explore,extract and utilize these resources to a greater extent.

    The fuel resources are of great importance as these help in extracting the potencyof other resources. Also there are vital re uisites industry, transport and po!ersectors. With this importance all the forms of fuels have commercial value, be itsolid "coal#, li uid "petroleum# and gas "natural gas methane#. It is for this reasonmining for these resources has been a ma$or activity at these region !here they areabundantly available. %any of the Indian states are the hubs of mining of coal,petroleum and gas. &har'hand, parts of (.). *rissa, +hattisgarh, and %adhya

    )radesh are the production centers of coal.

    Gevra cola mines area near ilaspur in %adhya )radesh is controlled andmanaged by -outh astern +oal /ields "- +0#. It is a ma$or coal production minebeing explored for huge uantities of coal in near future. The mining activitiesre uire a good road net!or' !ith satisfactory service to facilitate smooth movementof mining machines, dozers, excavators, haul truc's etc.

    This is essential to maximise the production !ith increased efficiency in handlingthe activities. 1aul roads used for carrying overburden materials and coal transportroads need a uplift.

    The Gevra mine area is comprised of t!o mining fields 2 Gevra and 3ipi'a. WhileGevra area has got a haul road, 3ipi'a is yet to get this road, for !hich the planninghas been made. The condition of the existing haul road and coal transport road isalso not good. -ince the - +0 is proposing to ac uire a fleet of hauling truc's of456 tonnes capacity, it is imminent to complete and upgrade the road net!or' tomeet the re uirement. It is !ith this bac'ground, - +0 had re uested +77I tocarryout the re uired studies and ma'e recommendations for the design of ne!road and betterment of existing haul road !ide their letter no.G%"4#8- +08 -)8466984494 dated ;64;69. The details of the coal field in bothGevra and 3ip'a area and road net!or' is sho!n in /igure and 4, respectively.

    1.2 Objectives and Scope

    The main ob$ective of the study is to design haul roads for these areas and ma'erecommendations. Thus, the scope included the follo!ing :

    i# A preliminary site visit and discussions

    1

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    2/32

    ig 1! layout "ap of road net#or$ in Gevra coalmines area

    2

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    3/32

    ig 2! layout "ap of road net#or$ in %ip$a coalmines area

    3

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    4/32

    ii# /ield studies and sample collectioniii# 0aboratory evaluation of material samplesiv# Analysis of data and interpretationsv# 7eport !ith recommendations

    1.& '(isting )oad *et#or$

    The 3ip'a area has to develop the haul road, but the Gevra area has got a haulroad, !hich needs to be extended and improved. Thus both need a proper designand construction. In addition the existing coal transport road is poor in conditionand needs to be structurally and functionally upgraded. Thus, the study needed afocus on evaluation of subgrade soil8existing earth and available road buildingmaterials.

    The existing haul road also has been made up of only layers of earth and stoneboulders added at different times. 3ue to heavy vehicle movement, the structure

    gets affected repeatedly and this accumulated damage has rendered the road verypoor to meet the re uirements. The coal transport road !ith heavy and continuoustruc' traffic is also damaged by repeated loads and !ater that is being continuouslysprin'led to arrest the coal dust. It is therefore, immediately re uired to design,construct and improve these roads accordingly.

    2. +',% +*-'S +G/ +O*S2.1 General

    A field visit !as made to assess the situation by !ay of discussions !ith theconcerned officials of - +0 and visual inspection of existing condition. Test pits!ere cut and field density of granular layer and subgrade !ere ta'en. collection of

    samples of materials !ere done .A number of field tests and surveys !ereunderta'en !ith a vie! to evaluate the present condition of roads and to determinethe uality of road construction materials used in construction of various pavementslayers, !hich included bituminous, granular and sub;grade. The field investigations!ere done to determine the structural ade uacy of the existing pavement, to findout the nature and extent of distress and to recommend appropriate measures forits rehabilitation. The various field studies that !ere underta'en during the courseof field visits are:

    )avement condition assessment Test pit observations

    Traffic volume studyThe detailed methodology adopted for carrying out the above activities in the field ispresented in the follo!ing sub;sections.

    2.2 Soil Sample 0ollection-amples of the existing soil and fill material !ere collected from the site to betested for the follo!ing properties:

    4

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    5/32

    i. Atterberg; ? sho! vie! of test pit cutting in progress. 0ocation of test pit and density

    measurements are given in Table

    0ocation @ear !eigh

    bridge in

    3ip'a area

    @ear border of

    old 3ip'a and

    Gevra

    +orner of

    +entral

    7amp

    +orner of ne!

    approach haul

    road

    +oal

    transport

    road

    &unction of

    central and

    south ramp)it no. 4 = 9 5/ield density 4.499 4. 99 +ould notdone

    +ould notdone . >

    +ould notdone

    /ield

    %oisturecontent

    B.9 4.6 >.6

    /ield dry

    density4.69B .B4 .4?

    2. raffic -olume and %ata

    The haul road net!or' is expected to cater for routine traffic in addition to movementof 456 T capacity dumpers under the *perational areas for = ?66 repetitions peryear. The dumpers carrying coal generally move on the roads indicated in the layoutmay. The daily traffic of these dumpers are 46 vehicles per day and their payloadis generally in the range of 4=6 tons to 456 tons.

    5

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    6/32

    ig 1 ! -ie# of 0oal "ines

    Photo 1 -ie# of open cast mines

    Photo 2 /nother vie# of open cast mines

    6

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    7/32

    ig & General vie# of the Haul )oad

    ig ! General -ie# of the Haul )oad

    7

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    8/32

    ig -ie# of 123 t %umper

    ig 4 ransportation of 0oal in progress

    8

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    9/32

    ig 5 "ovement of 0oal Hauler along the e(isting blac$topped road

    ig 6 Proposed /lignment of ne# road in front of #or$shop #ith appearanceof crac$s on e(isting shale material

    9

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    10/32

    ig 7 0ondition of e(isting 0oal Haul road

    ig 13 / vie# of overburden haul road in Gevra area

    10

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    11/32

    ig 11 Surface condition of coal haul road

    ig 12 Surface condition at starting point of coal haul road

    11

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    12/32

    ig 1& %istressed locations on haul road

    ig 1 0ondition of turning areas of haul road

    12

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    13/32

    ig 1 ailure due to poor drainage condition and lac$ of proper0amber

    ig 14 %evelopment of Potholes due to inade8uate maintenance and poordrainage

    13

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    14/32

    ig 15 -ie# of pit cutting in progress on overburden haul road

    ig 16 est pit cutting on haul road

    14

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    15/32

    &.3 ,/BO)/ O)9 'S +*G /*% /*/,9S+S

    &.1 General

    The laboratory investigations are carried out primarily for assessment of overallconstruction uality. 0aboratory evaluation of uality of materials collected from

    various test pits, includes mechanical and engineering characteristics. In order toevaluate different characteristics of various road building materials used duringconstruction of study stretches a number of relevant tests on subgrade soils,aggregates, !ere carried out. 0ocation of test pits dug on different road stretches!ith details of samples collected from each test pit for detailed laboratory evaluationin Institute

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    16/32

    0ocationof soil

    sample

    - a n d

    + o n

    t e n

    t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # 0 i u i d 0 i m i t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # ) l a s t

    i c l i m i t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # ) l a s t

    i c i t y I n d e x

    " ) e r c e n

    t #

    *

    % +

    " ) e r c e n

    t #

    % o

    d i f i e

    d ) r o c t o r

    3 e n s i

    t y

    " g m

    8 c c #

    + a

    l i f o r n

    i a

    , e a r i n g

    7 a

    t i o

    " C #

    - a t u r a

    t i o n

    % o

    i s t u r e

    " C #

    3ip'axtn )it 4 = 45.5 >.5 B B.9 .?>= 4.5 63ip'a

    xtn )it ? 4>. 5.6 6.5 .?45 =.? 6.5

    Table 2 Test 7esults of %oorum, -hale D 3ebris -amples

    Type ofsample -

    a n

    d +

    o n

    t e n

    t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # 0 i u i d

    0 i m i t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # ) l a s t

    i c l i m i t

    " ) e r c e n

    t # ) l a s t

    i c i t y I n d e x

    " ) e r c e n

    t #

    * %

    +

    " ) e r c e n

    t #

    % o

    d i f i e

    d ) r o c t o r

    3 e n s i

    t y

    " g m

    8 c c #

    + a

    l i f o r n

    i a

    , e a r i n g

    7 a

    t i o

    " C #

    - a

    t u r a

    t i o n

    % o

    i s t u r e

    " C #

    Gevramoorum 55 46 ; @) B 4. 95

    B.> 4.5

    +rushed-hale 9> 4 ; @) ?.9 4.6B4 9.= .4+oal

    debris"Gevra#

    5> 4? ; @) .> > 4 5

    Table 2= Test 7esults of Aggregate -amples

    16

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    17/32

    -ource of aggregate sample Aggregate-ample

    Agg ImpactEalue C

    Water Absorption

    C

    WetImpact

    Ealue C7atanpur aggregate 4 6.>9 9+ho!daha aggregate 4 4> .9= 4

    %a'hanpur aggregate = 9.9 5

    able ! est results of 0oarse Sand for %rainage ,ayer

    Sieve Si;e Percent passing=.>9 mm B94.6 mm B

    .6 mm ??>9 micron =

    4.3. Pavement %esign

    /or handling of coal and overburden material, use of heavy dumpers is essential.

    +onse uently for operation of such dumpers, it is necessary to design appropriate

    pavement systems other!ise there is a possibility of undesirably large settlement

    under the !or'ing loads.

    /or the safe !or'ing of a dumper, the pavement thic'ness should be ade uate for

    the magnitudes of imposed load and the sub;grade soil support should be ade uate

    to prevent excessive settlement. The pavement should be constructed !ith properspecifications ensuring ade uate uality control.

    The relationship curves for flexible pavement thic'ness vs. +. .7. of sub;grade soil

    had been !or'ed out, for a 456 t )ayload +apacity dumper !hich is expected to

    operate !ithin the coal mine.

    4.1 Parameters for %evelopment of le(ible Pavement %esign < hic$ness -s.

    0.B.). )elationship= for 243 t Payload 0apacity %umper

    The 456 %T )ayload +apacity dumper consists of pneumatic tyres carrying

    45B,?= t on the rear axle and =,5B= t on the front axle and a tyre pressure of

    .4 'g8 cm 4 "/igure #. /or 6 9 repetitions of the !heel load the load repetition

    factor is 6.?. The design of flexible pavement consists essentially of t!o steps:

    17

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    18/32

    "i# 3evelopment of relationship bet!een e uivalent single !heel load " -W0#

    and depth of construction for different values of +. .7. "/igure =#

    "ii# 3evelopment of + 7 +urves for 3esign of /lexible )avement for 456 t

    )ayload +apacity 3umper. "/igure 9#.

    "iii# The thic'ness of pavement crust for different values of + 7 are indicated in

    Table >.

    4.2 Parameters for %evelopment of le(ible Pavement %esign for 0oal

    ransportation road

    Traffic volume data !as collected by covering all categories of vehicles includingnon;motorized traffic at one location. The data !as collected by employing trainedfield personnel !ho recorded counts in a prescribed proforma. The traffic volume

    surveys !ere carried out for 4= hours continuously in three shift.

    The survey covered counting of different category of vehicles viz., light vehicles and

    commercial vehicles li'e truc's, buses, 0+E "goods# etc. The location of traffic

    count points !as near old #or$shop on coal transportation road . The data on

    classified volume counts, for both directions of traffic, is given in Table 5

    Table 5 +lassified volume counts on coal transportation roadEehicle Type -hift -hift 4 -hift Total

    T!o !heeler 6>4 564 =54 4 5&eep8Tempo B= 4 5 4 >

    Truc' single Axles =6> 46 4B9 B69

    Truc' Tandem Axles 566 6B 5? = B6

    Truc' Three Axles =6 ? =9 >>5

    Tan'er 4? tonne 59 9? B> 446Truc' 9 Axles ?5 5? == 5B?+rane B ? =6Grader 49 = 5 93ozer B 5 5

    46 ton 3umper 6 9 >9 =6

    18

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    19/32

    )ro$ected 3esign Traffic 0oading in Terms of +umulative -tandard Axles

    /or design purposes, variation in axle loads is usually handled by converting8reducing the actual axle load to an F uivalent -tandard Axle 0oad " -A0# . An

    e uivalency is simply a convenient means for indexing the !ide spectrum of actualloads to one selected value, !hich is ?.4 tonnes for single axle load and 9.tonnes for tandem axle "? tyres# load. The relative damaging effect of different axleloads is determined based on a characteristic relationship termed as the F/ourth)o!er 0a! . The rule states that the damaging po!er of an axle load increasesroughly as the fourth po!er !ith the increasing !eight of the axle. Any single axleload less than ?466 'g is therefore some fraction of e uivalent single axle load" -A0#, !hereas a load greater than single axle load is some multiple of -A0.-imilarly for tandem axles !ith ? tyres assembly, the rule states that the damagingpo!er of tandem axle increases as the fourth po!er !ith regard to the !eight of thestandard tandem axle, !hich is 9. tonnes.

    The design traffic in terms of +umulative -tandard Axles is !or'ed out by

    considering the heavy commercial traffic and their damaging effects"E3/# as

    explained in the earlier section, for a convenient design life duly accounting for the

    anticipated traffic gro!th. In the present case, the cumulative standard axles are

    !or'ed out for 6 years design life, assuming an annual gro!th rate of >.9C per

    year.

    @s H / r

    @s: The cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for in the design A: Initial traffic, in the year of completion of construction, in terms of the

    number of commercial vehicles per day duly modified to account for lane

    distribution.r: Annual gro!th rate of commercial vehiclesx: 3esign life in years/: Eehicle damage factor

    %esign of 0oal Haul )oad+ 7H43esign trafficH 5B?B +E)3

    59 x A J" Kr#x 2 L

    19

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    20/32

    E3/H =.93esign 0ife H 6 years0ane distribution factor H6.>9Total Traffic H 6? %-A)avement thic'nessH B56 mm

    xisting +rust H 566 mm*verlay re uired H 56 mm "detail is given in table of 7ecommendation#

    The value of cumulative standard axles covering different categories of commercial

    vehicles is pro$ected to be about 6? million standard axles, over a rehabilitation

    design life of 6 years

    20

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    21/32

    /ig . 3imensions of 456 t )ayload +apacity 3umper

    21

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    22/32

    3

    3333

    133333

    1 3333

    233333

    2 3333

    3 3 133 1 3 233 2 3 &33 & 3 33

    %epth of 0onstruction> cm

    ' 8 u i v a l e n t S i n g l e ? h e e l , o a d

    > $ g

    0B) 2

    0B) &0B)

    0B) 0B) 4

    0B) 5

    0B) 60B) 13

    /

    B

    igure ! )elationship bet#een 'S?, and %epth of 0onstruction for 243 tPayload 0apacity %umper

    22

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    23/32

    3

    3

    133

    1 3

    233

    2 3

    2 & 4 5 6 7 130B)> Percent

    % e p t h o

    f 0 o n

    s t r u c t i o n

    > c m

    igure ! 0B) 0urves for %esign of le(ible Pavement for 243 tonne %umper igure ! 0B) 0urves for %esign of le(ible Pavement for 243 t Payload

    0apacity %umper

    Table > : Ealues of + 7 vs 3epth of +onstruction for 456 t payload capacity dumper

    + 7 3 )T1 */ +*@-T7(+TI*@,+%

    = 4 6

    9 ?95 56> =6? 46B 66 66

    23

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    24/32

    5.3 %iscussion of test results

    ased on the observations recorded during the field visit of +oal mines in Gevra

    area and subse uent testing of high!ay material such as sub grade soil,

    aggregates, moorum, shale and coarse sand, interim recommendations for the

    pavement design of over burden haul road and for maintenance of coal haul road

    are given belo!:

    . The design + 7 for design of the pavement crust shall be assumed as =.

    4. The roads shall be designed on the follo!ing criteria:

    i. 7oads for movement of coal dumpers

    ii. 7oads for haulage of *verburden material

    . +oal haul roads are badly distressed due to poor drainage. +oal dust has been

    deposited at edges and shoulder portion of the pavement, !hich preventsdrainage of !ater from pavements to edges. Therefore first the coal dust should

    be removed from shoulder portion and one layer of Water bound %acadam

    "W %# GII as profile corrective course. The additional layers may be provide as

    under.

    =. The shale material " sand!iched layer bet!een overburden earth and coal#

    may be used for raising emban'ment and ma'ing sub grade. This material can

    not be used in sub base layer or in W % layer as a filler, being plastic in nature.It is advisable not to use this material for, maintenance of potholes or distressed

    area in granular layer.

    9. The overburden earth is of varying uality in nature place to place and some of

    !hich can be used for preparing sub grade for overburden haul road.

    5. )roper camber is re uired in all the existing roads as the existing camber is

    inade uate.

    >. +oal haul road is badly distressed due to poor drainage. +oal dust has been

    deposited at edges and shoulder portion of the pavement, !hich prevents

    drainage of !ater from pavements to edges. Therefore first the coal dust should

    be removed from shoulder portion and surface profile should be corrected and

    thereafter various layers should be made as given in Table belo!.

    24

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    25/32

    ?. Aggregates to be used in W % should have aggregates impact value less than

    6. Aggregates from uerry of 7atanpur and +ho!daha may be used but

    Aggregates from uerry of %a'hanpur should not be used.

    B. %oorum is non plastic having )I less than 5 so it can be used in W % layer.

    6.Ade uate hard shoulder of 4 meter !idth on both side is to be made. %aterial

    used in shoulder should be non plastic in nature. +ross fall of percent should

    be made to uic' run off of sprin'ling !ater on the pavement.

    .)roper drainage along the pavement is needed to drain off !ater immediately.

    4.Total road !idth of = m includes !idth of +arriage!ay 4 m, !idth of 3ozer

    path 9 m, and shoulders of 4 m each on both side.

    6.3 )'0O""'*%/ +O*S

    6.1 General )ecommendations

    . The present drainage system is inade uate and should be improved by

    constructing side drains at missing locations. -houlders shall be corrected to

    C camber so that the !ater drains off immediately. 3rains should be

    cleared off bushes to improve the existing drain system.

    4. 0ocations !here the section is badly crac'ed needs to be removed and a

    fresh layer should be placed.

    6.2 )ecommendations for Pavement design and rehabilitation

    )ecommendations

    Type of 7oad @e!8 xisting

    pavement

    7ecommendation

    *verburden haul

    road in Gevra Area

    xisting

    )avement

    *ne layer of W % GII 66mm

    *ne layer of W % GIII 66 mm*verburden haul

    road in 3ipi'a Area

    @e!

    )avement

    Total pavement thic'ness H4 66 mm

    /ourteen layers of W % GII each 66 mm

    T!elve layers of W % GIII each >9 m+oal Transportation

    7oad in Gevra Area

    xisting

    )avement

    one layer of % 66 mm as per %o-7T1

    Grading Table 966;= "as profile corrective course#

    one layer of 3 % 66 mm as per %o-7T1

    25

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    26/32

    Grading Table 966; 6

    one layer of 0-A%M 66 mm Grading given belo!

    one layer of -3 + 96 mm

    0-A%M 0arge size Aggregate %ix grading is effective as rut resistant mix

    -pecified Aggregate Gradation for 0arge -ize Aggregate %ix "0-A%#

    -ieve size "mm# )er cent passing=9.6 mm 66

    >.9 mm B6; 6649.6 mm ?4;B6

    B.6 mm 5?;B6B.9 mm ==;>4=.>9 mm 4?;944. 5 mm 46;=6

    566 micron 5;4466 micron 9; 996 micron 4; 6

    >9 micron 4;>

    +ross section of *verburden haul road in 3ip'a area

    /ppendi(@1Specification for 5 mm ?B"

    /. Properties of 0oarse /ggregate

    DozerPathShoul er

    32 !5 !

    26

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    27/32

    i. 0os Angeles Abrasion Ealue, per cent max. =6ii. Aggregate Impact value, per cent, max. 6iii. /la'iness and longation Index, combined , max. 6

    B. Grading )e8uirement for 0oarse /ggregate

    -ieve-ize mm

    >9mm W %Grade ; II

    >9mm W %Grade ; III

    49 ; ;B6 66 ;5 B6; 66 669 49;>9 B9; 66=9 6; 9 59;B6

    44.= 6;9 6; 6.4 6;9

    0. Grading )e8uirement for Screening

    -ieve-ize

    mm>9mm W %

    .4 ;

    .4 669.5 B6; 66?6 N 9; 9

    %. Auantities for 5. cm thic$ness

    i. +oarse Aggregate for >.9 cm compacted thic'ness per 6 m 4 H 6.B 2 .6>m

    ii. -tone screening type for 6.4 ; 6.44 m for GII and 6. ? ; 6.4 m for GIII

    iii. inding material of plasticity index less than 5C H 6.65 ; 6.6B m

    "##en $%&2

    27

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    28/32

    Specification for 3 mm Bituminous "acadam

    /. Properties of 0oarse /ggregate

    i. 0os Angeles Abrasion Ealue, per cent max. =6

    ii. Aggregate Impact value, per cent, max. 6iii. /la'iness and longation Indices "Total# 6iv. -tripping Ealue per cent, max. 9v. Water Absorption per cent, max. 4vi. 7etained tensile strength, minimum, per cent ?6

    B. Grading of /ggregates-ieve -ize, mm )ercent by Weight )assing the -ieve

    45.9 66B B6; 66.4 95;??

    =.>9 5; 54. 5 =; B

    66 micron 4; 6>9 micron 6;?

    0. Auantities of binder i. )rime +oat for 6 - .m 5'gii. Tac' +oat for 6 s .m. Area "+ationic bitumen emulsion#:

    4.9 'g for primed W % surface

    ii. Binder 0ontent for aggregates! &.& to &. per cent by #eight of mi(. %. 0onstruction Operation

    Apply prime coat of cationic emulsion O 5 'g8s m Apply tac' coat of cationic emulsion O 4.9 'g8s mTemperature of bitumen at the time of mixing shall be 96; 5 P+ and that of

    aggregate shall be 99; 5 P+.Temperature of mix at the time of laying shall be minimum 49P+.+ompaction of mix shall be completed before temperature of mix falls belo! 66P+.

    Appendix-4

    28

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    29/32

    Specifications for 3 mm hic$ %ense Bituminous "acadam %esign0riteria

    i# @o of blo!s on each face >9 ii# %arshall -tability "%in#, 'g B66

    iii# %arshall flo! , mm 4 ; =iv# C voids in the mix ; 566666666 v# C voids in mineral aggregate filled by the

    binder 59 ; >9

    B. Grading of /ggregate-ieve -ize mm )ercent )assing

    >.9 6645.9 B6; 66

    B > ;B9.4 95;?6

    =.>9 ?;9=4. 5 4?;=466N >;4

    >9N 4;?

    0. Physical properties of aggregatesi. 0os Angeles Abrasion Ealue, per cent max. 9ii. Aggregate Impact value, per cent, max 4>iii. /la'iness and longation Indices "Total# 6iv. -tripping Ealue percent, max. 9

    v. Water Absorption percent, max. 4vi. -oundness lossa# !ith -odium -ulphate, 9 cycles per cent 4

    b# !ith %ag. -ulphate, 9 cycles per cent ?vii. 7etained tensile strength min. percent ?6

    %. Auantity of binder for!inder for mix design, per cent @ot less than =.9 per cent

    '. Permissible -ariations from ob "i( ormula)assing B mm sieve D large, per cent ?)assing .4 mm sieve D B.9 mm sieve, per cent >

    )assing =.>9mm sieve, per cent 5)assing 4. 5 mm sieve D 566 micron sieve, per cent 9)assing 66 micron sieve and retained on 96 micron sieve, percent

    =

    )assing >9 micron sieve, per cent 4itumen, per cent 6.

    %ixing Temperature 6 +

    29

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    30/32

    . emperatures for 0onstruction Operations

    i. Temperature of bitumen at the time of mixing 96 ; 5 P+ii. Temperature of Aggregate at the time of mixing 99 ; 5 P+iii. Temperature of mix at the time of laying 46 ; 56P+iv. 7olling operations shall be completed before the temperature of the mix falls

    belo! 66P+

    C*ote! %ifference in temperature bet#een aggregate and bitumen should notbe more than 1 P0

    30

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    31/32

    /ppendi(@Specifications for 3 mm hic$ Bituminous 0oncrete %esign 0riteria

    i# @o of blo!s on each face >9ii# %arshall -tability "%in#, 'g B66

    iii# %arshall flo! , mm 4 2 =iv# C voids in the mix 2 566666666 v# C voids in mineral aggregate filled by the

    binder 59 2 >9

    vi# 0oss of stability on immersion in !ater at 56 P+, minimum retained strength, per cent

    >9

    B. Grading of /ggregateSieve Si;e mm Percent Passing

    B 66.4 >B; 66

    B.9 >6;??=.>9 9 ;>4. 5 =4;9?

    . ? =;=?566N 45; ?

    66N ?;4?96N 4;46

    >9N =; 6

    0. Physical properties of aggregatesi. 0os Angeles Abrasion Ealue, per cent max. 6ii. Aggregate Impact value, per cent, max 4=iii. /la'iness and longation Indices "Total# 6iv. -tripping Ealue percent, max. 9v. Water Absorption percent, max. 4vi. -oundness loss

    a# !ith -odium -ulphate, 9 cycles per cent "max# 4 b# !ith %ag. -ulphate, 9 cycles per cent "max# ?

    vii. 7etained tensile strength min. percent ?6viii. +leanliness, Grain size analysis, per cent passing >9 micron "max# 9

    %. Auantities of binder!

    inder for mix design, per cent @ot less than 9 per cent

    31

  • 8/12/2019 Bila Spur Report Final

    32/32

    '. Permissible -ariations from ob "i( ormula)assing B mm sieve D large, per cent ?

    )assing .4 mm sieve D B.9 mm sieve, per cent >)assing =.>9mm sieve, per cent 5)assing 4. 5 mm sieve D 566 micron sieve, per cent 9)assing 66 micron sieve and retained on 96 micron sieve, per cent =)assing >9 micron sieve, per cent 4

    itumen, per cent 6.%ixing Temperature 6 +

    . emperatures for 0onstruction Operations

    i. Temperature of bitumen at the time of mixing 96 ; 5 P+ii. Temperature of Aggregate at the time of mixing 99 ; 5 P+iii. Temperature of mix at the time of laying 46 ; 56P+iv. 7olling operations shall be completed before the temperature of the mix falls

    belo! 66P+

    C*ote! %ifference in temperature bet#een aggregate and bitumen should notbe more than 1 P0