big-sec a-grp 6-session 5-bang & olufsen
DESCRIPTION
Case Study AnalysisTRANSCRIPT
BANG & OLUFSENDESIGN DRIVEN INNOVATION
- CASE ANALYSIS
SUMMARY
Established in 1925 by Peter Bang & Sven Olufsen in search of perfect radio
Idea based product of high quality & aesthetics. Products included: TVs, Audio systems, Speakers,
Telephones etc. High Price, Low Volume & High Margins Innovation w/o the fear of failure. Innovators & Designers had the full authority to tweak the
process any time. Two types if stores:
B1 Stores – high rent locations, owned by dealers. 72% Total Revenue
SIS – set in places where B1 was not feasible. 28% revenue.
COMPETITIVE SITUATION
Dealing in only High end products, low volume but having perfection.
Protected against imitators, because its too expensive and too complicated to copy B&O products.
Not targeting mass market, and therefore not facing much competition from big players like Sony.
Targeting only 3-5 % of customers, having passion for excellence.
B&O has catered itself to Niche Market.
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Enjoys Strong Customer loyalty , 25-30% revenue comes from existing customers.
B &O Products have gained the reputation of Exquisite Products, as some of them have made its way to Museum of Modern Arts, New York.
Unmatched Products with satisfaction.
B&O products lasts for 15-20 years i.e. Non-Comparable with Industry Average of 2 years.
FEAR FACTOR
Constant Innovation and Retention of Customers.
Low Volume Production (20,000/Year).
Currently Targeting only High end segment, in Economic Downturn they might loose the Market.
DESIGN DRIVEN APPROACH
No in-house designer to facilitate unconditional approach
No standard process for design and development, but the collaboration of Designer, Concept developer, Engineer and Technicians
Design is based on synthesis which is the iteration of thesis and antithesis
Ideas are accepted if it has substance followed by the product commitment (Financial and Technical considerations)
Product team will be formed if the product is feasible
Designers remained involved throughout development
Open to changes at any point of production
Most products are made to order, smaller product like phones and accessories are made for stock
MERITS AND DE-MERITS
ADVANTAGES
Effective design and quality
Unique Product
Imitation is difficult
Motivates and freedom to employees
DISADVANTAGES
Incurs more time and cost
Convenience for employees
Poor financial results
IS IT SUSTAINABLE?
No, design driven approach is not sustainable.
Not for the needs of the customer.
Fierce competition from big players like Apple and Sony
Consumer change to virtual environment.
Traditional development method.
No innovation in the development and design process
IDEALAB INITIATIVE
Created in early 2004 to explore extensions to B&O’s product development process with an emphasis on computer technologies.
People with different background – business, design, software – different countries.
The extension of products helped generate additional revenue for the firm.
IDEALAB – ASSESMENT
An important arm of B&O for generating newer ideas from existing products.
A source of supplementary revenue to sustain in difficult times.
Will help in tapping the untapped & uncontested market (Media convergence, Customer Behavior with Media etc.)
Inter-Cultural Heat needs to be kept in check.
Ideas can directly be presented to CTO & CEO if they didn’t appeal to Design team.
CHANGE IN DESIGN PROCESS
YesRadical approach has not been changed much.New Organization role – Producer with responsibilities
across platforms & projects.New solutions need not pass through traditional
process.Thesis – Antithesis – Synthesis better through
competitive conflict.Focus needs to be kept on basic philosophy of the
company.Acceptance of idea should be on the basis of quality
of idea rather than the person from whom the idea came and his cultural background.
GROUP 6 PRESENTATION
ANIL BEHAL (11EMPDM196)Anurag Singh (11EMPDM197)ISHAN GARG (11EMPDM200)BHARTI VERMA (11EMPDM198)DEEPAK RAJA (11EMPDM199)AMIT KANABAR (11EMPDM195)KUMAR GAURAV (11EMPDM201)