bharat heavy electricals ltd - imtma · 2019-08-26 · powerpoint presentation author: deepakraj...
TRANSCRIPT
IMTMA-ACE MICROMATIC
Productivity championship
awards 2019
20th and 21th August 2019
Bengaluru
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
2
2015-16 Turn over Rs. 800 Crores
Over 30,000 of Valves were manufactured and
supplied during the year.
• High Rework Rate due to Back Seat
• Leak High Rejection Rate due to Seat Crack & Stem Collar Breakage
• High Process cost and Production Cycle Time due to Body-Yoke Welding.
Hand & Motor
Operated
Carbon Steel &
Alloy Steel
2015-16 (~26K)
Bypass Valve
Pressure Relieving Valve
Main Valve
Start
Raw material
Machining-
Valve body
Pre-Heating
Seat Welding
Post Heating
Final
Machining-
valve body
Inspection
Pre-heating
Root welding
Arc Welding
Stress
Relieving
Penetration
Removing
OK
No
t O
K
Radiographic
Inspection
LP Inspection
Shot Blasting Phosphating
Spot facing
Assembling
Hydrotesting
Final
Inspection
Handover to
User
End
Re-
Wo
rk
No
t O
K
Re-
Wo
rk
OK
22
Activities
Re-
Wo
rkMachining-
yokeM
achin
ing
Lapping
Parting
Re-Work
Shell TestSeat Test Backseat Test
Valves is in fully
closed condition
5% of the Valves
Tested Annually
fails this Test
As per the
Manufacturer Test
Procedure.
Valves is in partial
open Condition
There should be no
leak from the
Body-Yoke
Assembly or the
Packings
Valve is in fully
opened condition,
and seated against
the backseat.
No leak should be
there from the
Packing region
30% of the Valves
Tested Annually
fails this Test
Body Seat
Rejection
Body Yoke
Welding Rejection
Due to repeated heat treatment, during
Body – Yoke welding. The seat cracks.
This seat crack, calls for rejecting Body or
Yoke
After the Seat Leak, LPI is done
again, which shows Seat Crack in
some of the Cases
Since Conventional Welding is involved,
defects in welding are unavoidable
13% of Valves manufactured annually get
rejected due to this
1.Cycle Time
2.Material Handling
3.Rework Rate
4.Cost of Valve
5.Operator Fatigue
1.Productivity
2.Safety
3.Customer Satisfaction
Wastage of
Manpower and
Resources
Sl.No Problem No of Valves
1 Backseat Leak 2129
2 Seat Leak 350
3 Center Out Problem 253
4 Improper Machining 127
5 Yoke Thread Problem 59
Total 2918
RT & UT FAILURE DATA - 2015-16
MONTH Size-1/2" Size-1"Size-1
1/2"Size-2"
TOTAL
(Nos)
JUNE 5 10 0 1 16
JULY 1 0 1 3 5
AUGUST 0 0 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 3 0 15 16 34
OCTOBER 9 19 1 0 29
NOVEMBER 2 1 0 0 3
DECEMBER 7 38 2 0 47
JANUARY 8 18 0 2 28
FEBRUARY 0 59 2 24 85
9 MONTH 247
1 MONTH 25
PER ANNUM 330
PRODUCTION 26613
Percentage of
Rejection =13%
Percentage of
Rework =11%
1. Disc – Disc Retainer – Inside of Packing Ring
2. Disc Retainer – Packing Bush – Inside of Packing Ring
3. Body – Outside of Packing Bush – Outside of Packing Ring
Disc
Disc Retainer
Packing Bush
Retainer
Packing
Ring
Return to New
Order Cost of Process Rate Cum Rate % Cum %
A Welding and Inspection 588 588 28.52 28.52
B Yoke 295 883 14.31 42.82
C Body Machining 290 1173 14.06 56.89
D Body 251 1424 12.17 69.06
E Stem 200 1624 9.7 78.76
F Yoke Machining 135 1759 6.55 85.31
G Packing Bush, Retainer, Support 120 1879 5.82 91.13
H Dies & Retainer 100 1979 4.85 95.97
I Stud 58 2037 2.81 98.79
J Nut 25 2062 1.21 100
28.52
42.82
56.89
69.06
78.76
85.31
91.1395.97
98.79 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
A B C D E F G H I J
CU
M %
VA
LV
E C
OM
PO
NE
NT
RA
TE
Cost of valve-1/2” carbon steel valve
Total : ₹ 2,022
RT Failure
Penetration
Re-work
Seat Crack Rejection
Cost of Valve
• Welded Joint between Yoke and Body replaced by a screwed joint
• Stem integrated Tapered Backseat introduced.
20th July 2016 31st March 2017
Project Duration
Existing New
Return to Existing
1. Disc – Disc Retainer – Backseat - Inside of Packing Ring
2. Disc – Backseat Inside of Packing Ring
3. Body - Bonnet
Bonnet
AFTERBEFOREInternal
Treading
Leg provides extra strength
Bonnet Yoke
Internal
Treading
External
Treading
Threaded Body
Connecting Bonnet
Threaded Yoke
Retainer ring Stopper RingPacking bush
Copper Washer provided in
the Matching AreaFlexibility caused the
problem
Lapping and
Leakage
elimination
Screwed yoke:•No Welding•Interchangeability•Low cost•Less production time •No rework/rejection•Easy serviceable
Screwed bonnet:•No Power guns•Faster assembly•No defect•Easy serviceable
Forging body:•No welding•Different material•More strength
Spiral wound gasket:•No shell leakage•Easy replacement•Withstands<550 ®C•Easy serviceable at site
Taper feature in stem:•No collar cut at site•No load for disc•No customer complaint•Excess strength•No lapping/grinding
Threading:•All threads are metric•More Strength•No thread damage
Before
YOKE ACTS AS A PRESSURE PART
Carbon
Steel
Yoke
and
Body
Alloy
Steel
Yoke
and
Body
BONNET ACTS AS A PRESSURE PART
After
Carbon
Steel
Yoke for
Alloy
Steel
Body
₹ 251
₹ 295
₹ 588
₹ 36
₹ 37
₹ 290
₹ 135
₹ 7
₹ 58
₹ 25
₹ 200
₹ 100
Body
Yoke
Welding & Inspection
Retainer
Packing Bush
Body Machining
Yoke Machining
Stopper Ring
Stud
Nut
Stem
Disc & retainer
Total : ₹ 1,434
Bonnet Rs.80
28.52
42.82
56.89
69.06
78.76
85.31
91.1395.97
98.79 100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
500
1000
1500
2000
A B C D E F G H I JC
UM
%
VA
LV
E C
OM
PO
NE
NT
RA
TE
Cost of valve
14.31
28.37
40.54
50.24
56.79
62.6
67.4670.27 71.49
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
B C D E F G H I J
Revised Cost of Valve
Cost of valve reduced
upto 29%
Start
Raw material
Machining-
Valve body
Pre-Heating
Seat Welding
Post Heating
Final
Machining-
valve body
Inspection
Pre-heating
Root welding
Arc Welding
Stress
Relieving
Penetration
Removing
OK
No
t O
K
Radiographi
c Inspection
LP Inspection
Shot Blasting Phosphating
Spot facing
Assembling
Hydrotesting
Final
Inspection
Handover to
User
End
Re-
Wo
rk
No
t O
K
Re-
Wo
rk
OK
14
Activities
Re-
Wo
rkMachining-
yokeM
achin
ing
Lapping
Parting
Re-Work
8 Activities
are
eliminated
Financial gain due to manufacturing of screwed type
valve manufacturing/annum
Sl.No Description of costing involved Amount (Rs.)
1 REJECTION COST (PDO) Rs.11,94,630
2 COST SAVING BY MATERIAL REDUCTION Rs.1,79,13,034
3 COST SAVING BY MATERIAL SUBSTITUTION Rs.49,73,464
4 ELETRODE COST FOR REWORK DUE TO RT FAILURE Rs.6,13,665
5 FURNACE COST Rs.11,80,940
6 REWORK COST Rs.35, 87,079
Total loss/annum Rs.6,32,05,514
Electrical energy savings:
25035 kWh/ year
Man hour savings:
89005 hrs/ year
Machining of the
New Body Internals
The approximate concentration of gases during
welding by stick electrode:
Gas SO2 CO CO2
Quantity
(mg/m3)2.62 17.2 5760
The concentration of elements in welding fume
Elements Mn P Al Ni
Quantity
(mg/m3)2.5 2.3 8.5 0.07
7 Million worldwide died in 2012
Fumes and Gases are produced as Air Pollutants
Welding fume is classified as
potentially carcinogenic to
humans
Gases produced : Ozone, Nitrous Gases, Carbon Monoxide, Phosphine,
Phosgene etc.
Irritation of the eyes,
nose, and chest
Coughing Shortness of breath Bronchitis Nausea / Vomiting
Loss of appetite
Cramps
Fluid in the lungs (Edema)
Inflammation of the
lungs
(Pneumonitis)
Chronic lung problems
Bronchitis, Pneumonia,
Asthma, Emphysema,
Silicosis, Siderosis,
Lung Cancer Cancer of Larynx Cancer of Urinary tract
Parkinson’s Disease Skin Disease Kidney Damage Heart Disease
PATENT NO:
201731010196