beyond the limits of localised culture, michael wright

2
!"#$%&' )*"+$, isidro López-Aparicio iLA Beyond the limits of localised culture . !"#$ !" Beyond the limits of localised culture . Michael Wright Isidro López-Aparicio is an artist who deals in phenomenon, the stuff of reality, what and how we experience being in the world. From a simplistic perspective the exterior world is made of materials actions and objects while the interior world consists of images, thoughts and feelings. Isidro explores the role of the artist in negotiating between these two worlds, the interior and the exterior, internalising and processing the exterior and conversely externalising the interior world, giving it form in the material world. Artists in this sense deal with the translation of reality as experienced…. now there is a tricky word, ‘reality’…what is real? Perhaps that is the essential question and there in lies the deepest function of Isidro’s practice….to test what is real and to give his informed perception of reality a form which impacts on our intellect and emotions. We live in a partial awareness, if we were to be fully aware we would be driven mad by the overwhelming intensity and complexity of reality. In this sense normality, what we call reality, is only a social agreement which allows us to reside in the world without being overwhelmed. The intensity of the world is held at bay, filtered by reasonableness, moderation and routine and above all mediated in the contemporary world through the media of television and film. From a phenomenological perspective what we collectively perceive of reality is severely limited by the constraints and conventions of our patterns of perception, both physically and intellectually the visible and audible spectrums we perceive are only a minimal part of the whole spectrum. Our capacity for understanding is limited by our prejudices and the emotional need for security and stability. In the face of these social preoccupations the role of the creatively open artist is often seen to be unreasonable, outlandish and in defiance of the socially agreed sense of the real. Isidro practice is evidence in full of the valuable social and psychological role of the independent artist. His work documents a restless improvisation and creative play which reveals unpredictable patterns of relationships, patterns which disrupt the agreed norm and forestalls the closure of social agreement as to the real. He uses the strategy of incongruous juxtaposition, symmetry and asymmetry, displacement and re-contextualisation of the familiar.

Upload: isidro-lopez-aparicio

Post on 21-Mar-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Critic about the art work of Isidro López-Aparicio, writen from works in Beijin, China

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: beyond the limits of localised culture, Michael Wright

! ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * " + $ , ( (

!isidro López-Aparicio!!!!!!!!!!!!iLA!

Beyond the l imi ts o f loca l ised cu l ture .

 

  !!"#$%

!"#

Beyond the l imi ts o f loca l ised cu l ture . M ichae l Wr ight

Isidro López-Aparicio is an artist who deals in phenomenon, the stuff of reality, what and how

we experience being in the world. From a simplistic perspective the exterior world is made of materials actions and objects while the interior world consists of images, thoughts and feelings. Isidro explores the role of the artist in negotiating between these two worlds, the interior and the exterior, internalising and processing the exterior and conversely externalising the interior world, giving it form in the material world.

Artists in this sense deal with the translation of reality as experienced…. now there is a tricky

word, ‘reality’…what is real? Perhaps that is the essential question and there in lies the deepest function of Isidro’s practice….to test what is real and to give his informed perception of reality a form which impacts on our intellect and emotions.

We live in a partial awareness, if we were to be fully aware we would be driven mad by the

overwhelming intensity and complexity of reality. In this sense normality, what we call reality, is only a social agreement which allows us to reside in the world without being overwhelmed. The intensity of the world is held at bay, filtered by reasonableness, moderation and routine and above all mediated in the contemporary world through the media of television and film. From a phenomenological perspective what we collectively perceive of reality is severely limited by the constraints and conventions of our patterns of perception, both physically and intellectually the visible and audible spectrums we perceive are only a minimal part of the whole spectrum. Our capacity for understanding is limited by our prejudices and the emotional need for security and stability.

In the face of these social preoccupations

the role of the creatively open artist is often seen to be unreasonable, outlandish and in defiance of the socially agreed sense of the real. Isidro practice is evidence in full of the valuable social and psychological role of the independent artist. His work documents a restless improvisation and creative play which reveals unpredictable patterns of relationships, patterns which disrupt the agreed norm and forestalls the closure of social agreement as to the real. He uses the strategy of incongruous juxtaposition, symmetry and asymmetry, displacement and re-contextualisation of the familiar.

Page 2: beyond the limits of localised culture, Michael Wright

! ! " # $ % & ' ( ) * " + $ , ( (

!isidro López-Aparicio!!!!!!!!!!!!iLA!

Beyond the l imi ts o f loca l ised cu l ture .

 

  !!"#$%

!"#

Paradoxically these methodology are employed to allow the familiar to be seen in all its full intensity and complexity, His strategy is to dislocate and re-present the world, to shock us anew with its infinite complexity and fluidity.

In his seminal book ‘ The Hidden Order of Art’ Anton Ehrenzweig posits the theory that the artist reaches a level of de-differentiation, that is that they have the capacity to suspend the normative patterns of perception which differentiate one form from another, categorising the world into taxonomies, distinguishing positive from negative etc. In applying strategies that engender a state of de-differentiation there in lies the possibility of a more fluid creative and poetic relational play, that has the capacity to generate and reveal a more poetic level of understanding of relationship. To the unsympathetic eye work generated in this state of visual and conceptual openness is a descent into chaos, but in reality it is a submergence within a more complex and subtle level of order which extends beyond the social norms of familiar patterns of relationship. In this sense a serious artist resided in territory beyond the easily explicable and is only readable from a corresponding point of openness on the part of the viewer. What is easily explicable in art is never the true substance of the art form. It is the inexplicable sense of otherness and the disquiet of being confronted by a mysterious and compelling presence that is the hall mark of art of substance, transcending concept and technique it is perhaps most valuable as an affirmation of the mystery of existence itself and is not to be casually explained away.

In this sense of fluidity of relationship artists who adopt this creative strategy are often

wrongly perceived to be immoral or lacking in moral boundaries. This begs the question as to the role of the artist. The artists role is not to propagandise, no matter how laudable and worthy the social outcome, rather the more purposeful role of the artist is to engender a questioning relationship and to offer the viewer the possibility to re-see or re-align their perceptions, expectations and prejudices. This is the true pleasure of Isidro’s work that it impacts on the imagination and requires the active engagement and participation of the viewer to unravel the conundrum and complexity he presents.

Isidro is a multi media artist, a printmaker who moves between 2D performance, time based

and installation based practices. While he is sure footed in his aesthetic control of media and meticulously attentive to the visual detail, the work is always directed beyond the aesthetic. The aesthetic is a tool, a vehicle to access relationships between the world as phenomenon and the conventions of language, between the art and the viewer and inexorably to take the viewer to a point of contemplating the nature of being and the social constructs and conventions we use to organise and manage being in the world. For this reason the apparently disparate conceptual and visual forms and projects that López-Aparicio has engaged in, on further enquiry, coalesce into a coherent body of work, unified by the conceptual thread of a consistent and ernest level of penetrating enquiry.

His enquiry bridges the social and the aesthetic and is not afraid to use the poetic, the

absurd, the contradictory or the banal. In fact he delights in the mischief and potential of the novelty of his juxtapositions. Putting one thing with another generating a third reality, prompting and activating the imagination as the bridge between apparently disconnected realities. In this sense too Isidro has a wider purpose which is to seek connections and potential new forms of contact between culturally distinctive domains. Just as he seeks to bridge between the different domains of language he also seeks to find a commonality and unifying form for his art which is capable of extending beyond the limits of localised culture.

Text from Beijing, Chine working in 介于之间