“beyng-historical thinking” in heidegger’s contributions to philosophy.pdf
DESCRIPTION
“Beyng-Historical Thinking” in Heidegger’s Contributions to PhilosophyTRANSCRIPT
-
Page48
3.BeyngHistoricalThinkinginHeideggersContributionstoPhilosophy
AlejandroVallega
IntheintroductorysectionofContributionstoPhilosophy(FromEnowning),Heideggersaysthatthistitledoesnotdefinenordoesitattempttospeakaboutsomething.ThethinkingofContributions,hestates,mayonlyoccurasanattempt(einVersuch)tothinkthequestionofthetruthofbeyngoutofitsoriginarygroundinatimeoftransition(bergang).Heideggersays,intheageofthecrossingfrommetaphysicsintobeinghistoricalthinking,onecanventureonlyanattempttothinkaccordingtoamoreoriginarybasicstancewithinthequestionofthetruthofbeyng.1ThisthinkinginthetransitionHeideggercallsabeynghistoricalthinking(seynsgeschichtlichesDenken).InthisessayItrytounderstandthemotionofthoughtbehindthisattempt,i.e.,howbeynghistoricalthinkingmaybeunderstoodnotjustasathinkingintransitionfromoneepochtoanotherbutinitselfastransitional(bergnglich),asathinkingofpassage.
Thisessayisdividedintofourparts.InthefirstIdirectmyattentiontothequestionofthematter(dieSache)giventobethoughtattheendofmetaphysics,andhowthistaskistakenupinContributions.2Inthesecond,inordertocomeclosertothetermbeynghistoricalthinkinginContributions,IpointoutHeideggersdistinctionbetweenhistoriography(Historie),andhistoryorhistoricaloccurrence(Geschichte).3Thisdifferentiationisthendevelopedinitsmoreessentialaspectinthethirdpart,whereIdiscussitstemporalfoundationbydiscussingitspassingandinceptualcharacter.InconsideringthetemporalcharacterofthethinkingofbeynginContributions,itbecomesclearthattheessentialswayingofbeyng(WesungdesSeyns)4occursasapassage(acomingtobeinpassingaway),andaleap(Sprung):aleapthatinitsoccurrencenotonlyenactstheunsettlingofanyconceptionofbeyngintermsofthelogicofpresencesandeverlasting,unchangeableessencesororigins,butoccursitselfasitsownunsettlingovercomingpassage.InthefinalpartIindicatethatContributions,withitsfugalstructure,enacts(vollzieht)thisleapofthepassageofbeyng.
AlmostattheClosure
Whatiftherewerenothingbehindtheappearing5thatwecallworld?Howwouldonethinkthisnothingness?Certainlynotintermsofthemetaphysicalstructuresthatwouldalwayssuggestsomethingelseeternalandunchangingunderneathorabovethesurfaceoftheappearing.Butthiswouldalsomeanthatthisnothingwouldnotbewhatis
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page49
notpresence,whatissetagainstpresenceathand,sincethispresencewouldnolongerbedictatedbythetraditionalconfigurationsthatcouldgivemeaning,oressence,totheappearingasthewhatnessofwhatappears.Itwouldthenbeaquestionofacertainnothingnessneitherempty,asitmightbeunderstoodincontrasttothingspresentathand,norsenseless,asunderstoodincontrasttothelogicorreasonofmetaphysicsandtranscendentalphilosophies.Inotherwords,andotherwordswouldbeneededpreciselyinthelightofthequestionofthisnothingness,thequestionwouldbeoneofthinkingawayofbeingutterlyother:othertoobjectivepresenceandfact,othertotheconceptualconfigurationsofpresence,andothertothesufficientreasonthatsustainsthelogicofpresence.
WhenwelookatthebeginningofContributionswecanseethatHeideggersthinkingbeginsattheclosureofmetaphysics,i.e.,atthelimitofNietzschesthoughtofnihilism.InthefirstpagesofContributionsHeideggerreferstothetaskannouncedbythetitleofthebookasanattempt(Versuch)tothinkthequestionofthetruthofbeyngoutofitsoriginarygrounding.6Thisattemptoccursinthetimeofthetransition(Zeitalterdesbergangs)frommetaphysicstobeynghistoricalthinking.7ThethinkingofContributionsoccursassuchinacertaintransition(bergang).
InhislectureonNietzschesthinkingofnihilism,wintersemester1937/38,thetimeofthecompositionofContributions,HeideggerdirectlybroachesthesubjectofthetransitionfrommetaphysicstothebeynghistoricalthinkingofContributions.InthislectureHeideggerwrites,Thisendofthefirstbeginning(ersterAnfang)ofWesternphilosophyisNietzschefromhereandonlyfromheremusthisworkbedeveloped,ifitistobewhateachendmustbeatransition(bergang).8
NietzschesNihilism,theverydiscoverythatGodisdead,thatbehindtheappearingthereisnothing,isnotonlytheendofmetaphysics,butthisendremainstobethoughtinitsveryoccurrence(Ereignis)asthetransitionfrommetaphysics,thefirstbeginning,tobeynghistoricalthinking.
TheseemingoverlappingofNietzschesnihilismandHeideggersownthinkingdoesnotmarkadirectcontinuitybetweenthetwo.HeideggersthoughtonlytouchesonNietzscheatthelimitofNietzschesthinkingofnihilism.Later,inEuropeanNihilism,aseriesoflectureswrittenin1940aspartofHeideggersongoingmeditationonNietzsche,Heideggerwrites,
Theendofmetaphysicsdisclosesitselfasthecollapseofthereignofthetranscendentandtheidealthatsprangfromit.Buttheendofmetaphysicsdoesnotmeanthecessationofhistory(Geschichte).Itisthebeginning(Beginn)ofaseriousstrugglewiththatoccurrence(Ereignis):Godisdead9
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page50
Theendofmetaphysicsdoesnotmeananend,acessationoftheoccurrence,Ereignis,orhistory,Geschichte,ofbeing.Fromnihilismwemightlearnthatmetaphysicsisnottoberepeatedbut,atthesametime,theendofmetaphysicscannotbeabandonedasifmeaningless.Totheendofmetaphysics,tothedeathofGod,belongsahistoricaloccurrencethatdoesnotstop,norend,andthatremainstobethoughtasitgivesitselftobethought.Thinkingwouldnowremain,staywith,whatisgiventobethoughtintheoccurrenceoftheendofmetaphysics:intheveryoccurrenceofthedeathofGod,whatisgiventobethoughtisthisdeathinitself,thisnothingness.AsHeideggerconcludes,Nietzschesthoughtmarksthebeginningofaseriousstrugglewiththatoccurrence[Ereignis]:thedeathofGod.ItisthisstruggletothinkinthedeathorabsenceofGodandmetaphysicalmeaningsthatisindicatedinthesupplementarytitletoContributions,whereHeideggerhasalreadysituatedthethinkingofthebookasoccurringoutofandinthisstruggle,asathinkingvomEreignis.10
ButNietzschesthoughtitselfonlyintimateswhatisgiventobethought.InTheWilltoPowerasArt,HeideggerexpresslystatesthatNietzschetakestheleadingquestion(Leitfrage)ofphilosophy,thequestionofthebeingofbeings,asthequestion,andneglectstoaskthegroundquestion(Grundfrage),thequestionofbeingassuch(WasistdasSeinselbst?).11AccordingtoHeidegger,withthedoctrineofthewilltopowerNietzschesthoughtwithdrawsfromhisowninsightconcerningnihilismandultimatelyremainsmetaphysical,thusfailingtoasktheessentialquestionofthetruthofbeingassuch.
BringingNietzschesrealizationthatthereisnothingbehindtheappearingoftheappearancestothegroundquestionofphilosophy(Grundfrage)wouldnotbeamatterofseekinganotherkindofaccounttobegivenaboutbeings.Rather,theveryquestionaskedwouldchange.12Inbringingnothingassuchintoquestion,onewouldhavetothinkthisappearinginitsoccurrence,assuch:thequestionwouldthenbethatoftheappearinginitsappearingassuch.BeynghistoricalthinkingasthethinkingofthetransitionwouldthinktheveryoccurrenceofthedeathofGoditwouldthinkwhatgivesitselftobethoughtinthispassageitwouldnotonlythinkinthelightoftheveryawarenessthatbehindtheappearancesthereisnothingbutitwouldthinkinthispassage,andoutofthisnothingness.
HighinthelowerAlpsliesasmallcemetery.Thereayoungmanisbeingburied,onewhowassoconsumedbylifeastopassawayatanearlyage.Thefuneralissimpleafewfriends,butmostlystrangerstotheyoungman,likemyself.Afterafewwordshavebeenspokenbyapriestandothershaverecalledtheyoungmanattherequestofhismother,theurnfilledwithhisashesisbroughttoitsrestingplace.As
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page51
thecemeteryworkertriestosettheurninitsplaceinamarblewall,silencefallsuponallthosepresent.Someonebeginsaprayerdestinedtoreturntosilence.Silence.
Silence,andthen,aftersometime,voicesbegintoecho.Notunifiedvoicesinprayer,orrecollectionsofthedead,butconversationsthatspringfromuttersilence,echoesoutofsilenceconversationsasdiverseasthefoliageandflowersthatalmostoverrunthecemeteryandthemarblewall.Conversationsthatarefleetingandyetlightascloudsandsky.Conversationsamongststrangers,likemyselfwheredotheseelementalwordscomefrom?Howisitthatoutofsilencemightcomesuchdisclosureoflivingconfigurations?
InDieGeschichtedesSeyns[Thehistoryofbeyng],13aworkthatbelongstoContributionsaswellasexpandsit,onethatwascomposedimmediatelyafteritin1938/39,Heideggermakesthefollowingbriefremarkaboutbeynghistoricalthinking:
Thefirstleap(Sprung)ofthinkingthinks:Beyngisnothing(DasSeynistdasNichts).Nothingnothings(DasNichtsnichtet).14
IntheselinesweheartheradicaldifferencebetweenHeideggersthoughtandNietzsches,atleastasunderstoodbyHeidegger.15ForHeidegger,Nietzschesquestionofbeingisstillthequestionofthebeingnessofbeings,beingasthepresenceofbeingsoutoftheirneedtobe,aneedgatheredconceptuallybyNietzscheunderthefiverubricsthatformonemetaphysicalinterpretationofbeing.16ForHeideggerthequestionofbeyngisoutsidethelogicandnecessityofpresence:beyngisnotanything.TheabruptleapfromNietzschetoHeideggerismarkedbytheyofbeyng(Seyn).17Heideggersreturntothearchaicspellingofbeing(Sein)marksthisleap.Thisleapopensthequestionofbeynganew:beyngisnottobethoughtnowintermsofpresencebutasnothing.Heideggersays,DasNichtsnichtet.WecangetaglimpseofthequestionthathasopenedevenaswetranslatethisbriefpassageintoEnglish:nothingnothings.Itisnotnothingbutacertainoccurrence(Ereignis)thatisgiventobethought.Wemightrepeatthelastwordofthelastphrase,nothings,inanotherwaythatplacesitatthecenterofContributions:theexpressionnothingsrecallsustoourneedtothinkbeyngsessentialswaying(dieWesungdesSeynsselbst.)
InthisfirstsectionIhavesituatedthethinkinginContributionsattheclosure(nottheend)ofthehistoryofmetaphysics.Thisisasignificantmovebecauseitletsusseecertainfundamentalaspectsofbeynghistoricalthinking.Fromwhatwehavediscusseditisclearthatbeynghistoricalthinkingdoesnotoccurasthecontinuationoroutcomeof
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page52
historiographicaldevelopments.Rather,ittakesplaceasareturningofthedeathofGodandtheclosureofthemetaphysicalinterpretationoftheworldasconstitutedbyadualismofchangingbeingsandunchangingbeing.Thisindicatesasecondcharacteristic.Beynghistoricalthinkinghasabeginningintheinterruptionofthemetaphysicalinterpretationoflivingconfiguratingevents,inthegapbetweenNietzschesWilltoPowerandHeideggersthinkingsaying,andintheleapwearecalledtomakeifwearetothinkthematterthatisgiventobethoughtbynihilismandyetremainswithoutarticulationinNietzsche.
Furthermore,thisproblematizationofnihilismbringswithittwoquestionsthatarealreadyindicatedbytheveryexpressionseynsgeschichtlich.IfinContributionsHeideggerthinksoutoftheclosureofmetaphysics,histhinkingmustoccurotherwisethanintermsoftheontologicaldifferencebetweenbeingsandbeing.Thisisthecaseforthemetaphysicalinterpretationofthisrelation,thedifferencebetweenchangingandunchangingessences,aswellasfortranscendentalarticulationsofbeyng,includingHeideggersowninBeingandTime.Therehespeaksofanontologicaldifferencebetweenentitiesathandandbeing.Indeed,theverytermseynsgeschichtlichindicatesasinglemotionofthought,asinglemattertobethoughtinthismotion,asingletemporaloccurrencebeyondthisontologicaldualism.
Thisalsomeansthatthedenselivingoccurrencesthathavebeeninterpretedastheobjectivefactsofhistoriographyorastheexpressionofalogicalmotionunderlyingit,arenowtoberethoughtandunderstoodforthemselves,intheirownoccurrence,i.e.,beyondtheirinterpretationaseitherobjectiveorlogical.Thequestionis,howarewetograspthetermbeynghistoricalthinking?
HistoricalBeyng,notHistoriography
AtthebeginningofContributions,Heideggerspeaksoftheworkinthebookasanattemptatabeynghistoricalthinking(seynsgeschichtlichesDenken).18ThetermistranslatedbyEmad/Malyasbeinghistoricalthinking.IprefertotranslateitintoEnglishasbeynghistoricalthinking.19ThewordthatistranslatedashistoricalinbothcasesisnotitsGermancognatehistorisches,butgeschichtliches.Heideggerschoiceissignificant.Geschichtlichesrefersnottothemeasurableandfactualtimeofobjectivepresenceanditshistoriography(Historie).20Rather,thewordattemptstosoundouttheveryoccurrence(Ereignis)ofappearingassuch,theessentialswayingofbeyngassuch(dieWesungdesSeynsselbst).
ThewordsgeschichtlichandGeschichtefindtheirverbalformingeschehen,whichmeanstooccur.Thethreetermsarerootedinthewordgiskiht,fromOldHighGerman.21Giskiht,asechoedingeschehen,bespeaks
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page53
themomentaryandcontingentcharacterofanyevent,incident,orepisode.22Giskihtalsosoundsoutnotonlyparticularevents23buttheoccurrenceoftheirgatheringintoameaningfulwhole.24FromthisetymologywemayseethatGeschichteandgeschichtlichechotheoccurringofbeingsnotintheirdeterminateanalyzableobjectivity,notasthingsalreadydetermined,notasunchangingessences,butintheiressentialtemporality.Heideggerschoiceofwordsechoesanopening,momentaryandunpredictable,apassagethatisunanalyzableaswellasunpredictable,althoughgivenforthegatheringofbeingsintheirconfigurations.
ThisdifferentiationbetweenGeschichteandHistoriedoesnotbeginwithHeidegger.Wemaytraceitbacktotherootsofhermeneutics.ThedifferentiationisfirstmadebytheGermantheologianM.KhlerandisthensystematicallysustainedinthehermeneuticsofscripturefromDiltheytoBultmann.25InHeideggersownworkwefindthedifferentiationalreadymadeinthehermeneuticsofBeingandTime,wherehedifferentiatesspecificallybetweenthehistoricity(Geschichtlichkeit)oftheopeningofbeingasgivenwithdasein,andthehistoriographythatispossibleinthelightofthisdisclosingoccurrence.
Temporalityrevealsitselfasthehistoricity(Geschichtlichkeit)ofdasein.Thestatementthatdaseinishistoricalisconfirmedasanexistentialandontologicalfundamentalproposition.ItisfarremovedfrommerelyonticallyascertainingthefactthatDaseinoccursinaworldhistory(Weltgeschichte).Thehistoricityofdasein,however,isthegroundofapossiblehistoriographicalunderstanding(historischesVerstehen)thatinitsturnharborsthepossibilityofgettingaspecialgraspofthedevelopmentofhistoriographyasascience(HistoriealsWissenschaft).26
ThisarticulationofthedifferencebetweenHistorieandGeschichteremainslimitedbythetranscendentaldirectionofthedaseinanalytictowardanessentialtemporalground/horizoninBeingandTime,anditisthereforetoberethoughtinContributions.However,thedistinctionbetweenhistoriography(Historie)andtheoccurrence(Geschichte)ofbeingsintheopeningofbeyngmaybefollowedthroughtoContributionsandtracedbackfromContributionstothethinkingoftemporalitythatHeideggerisalreadycomingtoinBeingandTime.27
Thedifferentiationbetweenfactualhistory(Historie)andhistoricaloccurrenceassuch(Geschichte)isindicatedbyHeideggerslanguageinContributions.HeideggerspeaksinContributionsofbeynghistoricalthinkingasatransition(bergang),andhealsocallsthisthinkingathinkingunderway(Gedankengang).28InthesecondcaseHeideggeremphasizesthepassageofthinkingunderliningandseparatinggangfromGedanken.ThetwotermsdirectlyreferthethinkingofContributionstoHeideggersunderstandingofthewaybeyngisgiventobethoughtin
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page54
Greekexperience.TheopeningofbeyngoccursfortheGreeksandisthusindicatedwiththewordphusis.ThiswordHeideggertakestoindicatetheveryWesungdesSeyns,thepassingincomingtobeofbeyng,translatedastheessentialswayingofbeing.29HeideggertranslatesphusisasAufgehen,orAufgang:awordthatrecallsthespringingforth,takingplace,comingoutthatechoesinphusis.30Thus,bergangandGedankengangrecalltheAufgang,thepassageintheveryoccurrenceofthecomingtobeinpassingawayofbeyng.
ThePassingofBeyngHistoricalThinking
Inthebeginningpart(Vorblick)ofContributions,Heideggerspeaksofbeynghistoricalthinkingasatransition(bergang)frommetaphysicstotheotherbeginningofthinking(derandereAnfangdesDenkens),31i.e.,fromtheinterpretationofbeingintermsofbeingsthatoccurswithGreekthoughtatthebeginningofourmetaphysicaltradition,totheotherbeginning.ThisthinkingmotionisforHeideggernotabridgebutathinkingthatitselfoccursasapassage.Heideggercallshisthinkingathinkingunderway(Gedankengang).32Thetermsfirst,other,andtransition,donotrefertotwopoints,anoriginanditsother,whicharetobebridgedbyacertaincrossingoverfromonelocationtoanotherinhistory.33HeideggersaysinContributionsthattheotherbeginningistheonlyotheroutofrelationtotheoneandonlyfirstbeginning[ausdemBezugzudemeinzigeinenunderstenAnfang].34Whatistobethoughtisasingleoccurrence,asinglepassage,theonlyoneandfirstbeginningofthinking.Beynghistoricalthinkingwouldoccurthenasanattemptatbeginning,anattemptataninceptualthinking,anattemptatananfnglichesDenken.35Therefore,inordertounderstandbeynghistoricalthinking,wewouldhavetoentertheplayofthisattemptingbeginning,wewouldhavetostandintheinbetweenthatistheplaceorpassageoftheoccurrenceofthisthinking.
HeideggerasksinContributions,Whatisthebeginning[Anfang]?Hereplies,
Itistheessentialswayingofbeingitself[dieWesungdesSeinsselbst].Butthisbeginningfirstbecomesenactableastheotherbeginninginitsencounter[Auseinandersetzung]withthefirst.Beginningunderstoodinceptually[anfnglichbegriffen]isbeyngitself.36
Inthispassagewefindtwoaspectsofbeginning(Anfang).Heideggerfirstsaysthatbeginningistheessentialswayingofbeyngitself.Butthenhegoesontomakethefollowingobservations:beginninginthesenseofbeyngitselfcanonlyoccurintheencounter(Auseinandersetzung)
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page55
ofthefirstandotherbeginning.Thefirstandtheotherbeginningdonotdefinepointsinhistory,asifweweretoaccomplishamovefrompointAtopointB.37Itisintheencounteroffirstandotherbeginning,intheirplayingoffeachother,thattheyenacttheopeningofbeyng.Furthermore,whatHeideggerissayingisthattheoneandonlybeginningisbeyngitselfasitoccursintheplayencounteroffirstandotherbeginning.Thebeginning(Anfang),astheoneandonlybeginningbeingenacted,cannotbeunderstoodasanoriginthatisunchanging,becausebeyngcanonlyoccurinandasenactment(Vollzug).Inotherwords,thereisnotanunchangingoriginorbeginningtowhichthinkingmightreturn.38TodeepentheplayencounterofthebeginningsbyreducingthemtoarepresentationofacertainoriginaleventwouldbetolosepreciselythethoughtthattakesplaceinContributions.Theencounterofthefirstandotherbeginningcanbeunderstoodoutoftheoriginarytemporalityoftheopeningofbeyngitself.
GeschichtlichesDenken,thethinkingofthehistoryofbeyngassuch,occursotherwisethaninthetraditionalsenseofhistory,metaphysics,ortranscendentalphilosophy.Putinanotherway,beynghistoricalthinkingdoesnotoccurinthetermsofthelogicthathasheldandgivenmeaningtothetraditionsincetheGreeks.AsIhavepointedoutabove,accordingtoHeideggeritisthesettingupofacertainlogicofaffirmationandpresencethatreducesthequestionofbeingassuchtothequestionofthebeingnessofbeingsatthebeginningofGreekphilosophy.39Withthislogiccomestheintrinsicassociationofthequestionofbeingwiththatofproduction.AccordingtoHeideggeritisthisassociationofbeingassuchwithpoiesisandtechnethaterasesthequestionofthepassageofbeyng.Thisproductionorientedlogicthatisthenassumedandattributed,dictatedtobeing,isalsousedintheinterpretationoftemporality.Inthiswaytimeisdividedintopresent,past,andfuture,sectionsoftemporalitythatassuchmaketimemarchaccordingtothelogicofpresence,makeitquantifiable,fixable,andproducible.40
IfwenowgobacktothepassageonbeginningfromContributions,accordingtoHeidegger,theotherbeginningoccursinplaywiththeonlyoneandfirstbeginning.Thismeansthattheotherbeginningoccursalwaysandonlyalongwithafirstbeginning.Theotherbeginningcanonlymakeanysenseintheplaywiththefirstbeginning.Whatoccurshereisastrangeturn,areturnofthefirstbeginning.Isayreturnbecauseinthemotionofgoingovertotheotherbeginning,andsincetheotherbeginningcanonlyoccurinthelightofthefirst,theremustalwaysbeacertainrecallingofthefirstbeginning,acertainturningagainofthefirstbeginningthatunsettlesandovercomestheveryconceptofafirstunchangingorigin.
Theplayencounteroffirstandotherbeginningoccursonlyintheenactmentofanoriginaryeventthathasnometaphysicalorigin.Inthe
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page56
returningmotionofbeynghistoricalthinking,nothingislefttooblivion,nothingremainsundisturbed.InthelastsectionofDieGeschichtedesSeyns,Heideggerwritesalistofenactments,ofmomentsofconfigurationofthehistoryofbeyng.Neartheend,referringtoHlderlinspoetry,Heideggerwritesasinglename,Mnemosyne.41Thisnamebringstomindmemoryandtemporality,butitdoessobyappealingtotheoverturningortransformativepowerinherentinmemorialevents.Mnemosyneisthenameoftheriverthatrunsoutsidethelogicofbeingsandtheirhistory:thenamemarksthemotionofariverthatrunsbackwards.Wemightconsiderthisrecallingoftheriverintryingtounderstandthemotionofthoughtbehindthegoingover.Tosaythatariverrunsbackwardsisnottosaythatariverrunsitscoursetoanendandthenreturnstoaneverpresentbeginningororigin.42ThereisnogeometricalpossibilityforMnemosyne.Toflowbackwardsistocontradictanylinearorobjectivetemporallogic.Ariverflowingbackwardsdefeatsanyteleologyorprojectedhorizon,sinceinitsmotionitgoesbackonlyingoingforward,andatthesametime,itgoesforwardonlybyclaimingitspast,itsorigin.Furthermore,itsgoingbackwardsisagoingonthatinmovingtowardthepastdecenterseveryoccurrenceinthatpast,sothatthegoingonisatonceanappropriationanddecenteringofallorigins.43
Infiguringthisreturningorovercomingmotionofbeynghistoricalthinking,wearenowspeakingofthemotionbywhichwhatremainstheunthinkableempty,ornothing,inthetraditionofmetaphysics,isbroughtforthasthemattertobethoughtifbeyngassuchistobethought.Witheachreturning,thefirstbeginningisbroughtforthnotintherepetitionofanunchangingoriginbutintheopeningpossibilityoftheeventofalteritythatisinherenttoitsoccurrence.OnemightthinkbacktothedeathofGodandhowforHeideggerthisisnottheendofhistory,theclosureofthequestionofessence,butamomentofpassagegiventobeunderstood,withstood,andundergoneinitsfulldensityandconcretenessasthemattertobethoughtisgiveninthatdeath,i.e.,initsdensitythinkinghasnoclosureintheovercomingmotionoftheessentialswayingofbeing.ThisiswhatHeideggerispointingoutwhenhesaysinGeschichtedesSeyns,DasNichtsnichtet.44
Becausenothingdoesnothaveaplaceinthelogicofbeings,thisotherness,arisenintheovercomingmotionofthehistoryofbeyng,cannotbereinscribedintothefirstmetaphysicalbeginning.Sincethefirstbeginninghasitselfbeenrecalledinthelightofitsotherness,andthisothernesscannotbethoughtintermsofit,thefirstbeginningwoulditselfbethinkableotherwisethaninthetraditionalway.Butthiswouldbebecausewhatgivesitselftobethoughtisnolongerthebeingofbeingsbutthepassageofbeynginitstruth(dieWahrheitdesSeyns).45
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page57
Thisunsettlingorovercomingmotionischaracteristicofbeynghistoricalthinking.Inthinkinginthisreturnwecometoapassagethat,inenactingitstakingplace,hasalwaysalreadygoneoutside,beyonditsoriginaryoccurrenceortoputitinversely,thepassageofbeyngalwaysmustremainunsurpassable,sinceitsbeginninghasalwaysalreadybeenovercomebyitsveryoccurrence.Intheopennessoftemporalityassuch,orderingbelongsnottologicandproductionbuttotemporalityinitsonesingleopeninginwhichpast,present,andfutureareatplayatonce.
WefindthischaracteristicreturningofbeynghistoricalthinkingindicatedinthefirstpartofContributions,whereHeideggersaysthatThethinkingofthefutureisathinkingunderway(Gedankengang).46Inthelightoftheovercomingcharacterofbeynghistoricalthinking,wecannowsaythatthethinkingtocome47isnotsomeotheraccountofbeing.Rather,itisathinkingtocomebecauseitmustinhabititsplaceinthefuturebyundergoingitsownpassing,bybeingathinkingthatinitsovercomingpassingmustalwaysremainunderway.ButthatHeideggerwouldindicatethatbeynghistoricalthinkingisaGedankengangindicatesthathisthinkinginContributionsisathinkingthatoccursintheawarenessofthisovercomingcharacterofthethinkingofbeyng.Wearespeakingofathinkingthatoccursinitsawarenessofitsoccurrenceoutofphusis(Aufgehen),athinkingthatoccursintheenactmentofitsownpassage.Whatwediscoverhereisthatindeed,HeideggersthoughtinContributionsisnotapassagetowardahorizonthatawaitsit,noranostalgicreturntotheGreeks.AsHeideggersaysinthePreview,Wearealreadymovingwithinanothertruth,evenaswearestillinthecrossing.48Whatbeynghistoricalthinkingindicatesisanovercomingmotionthatmarksinitspassageanopening,aninceptivemomentthatassuchenactstheopeningmotionofathinkingsayingthatinitsquestioningkeepsopenthepossibilityofbeyngoutofitsessentialsway.Therestofthissectionwillbedevotedtofurtherclarificationofthisstatement.
InContributionsHeideggerspeaksofbeginning(Anfang).Furthermore,beynghistoricalthinkingisitselfinseparablefromthenotionofbeginning(Anfang),sincethisthinkingoccursasananfnglichesDenken(inceptivethinking).Therefore,theissueisnowhowtounderstandHeideggersnotionofbeginning.Inapassagealreadycited,HeideggersaysthatBeginning(Anfang)understoodinceptuallyisbeyngitself.ThisbringsustothesecondaspectofAnfang.Insection242ofContributions,Heideggersays,thetruth[ofbeyng]asgroundgroundsoriginarilyasabground.49Thismeansthatthetruthofbeyngoccursasanungroundedgroundingmotion.Thisalsomeansthatinorderto
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page58
understandAnfangwewouldhavetoseekitinthelightoftheessentialswayofbeynginitstruthinenowning(Ereignis).
Beforegoingonwemightkeepinmindwhatisnotimpliedbythewordungrounding.Weshouldbecarefulandnotpresupposeagroundthatmustbetherefirstinorderfortheungroundingtooccur,andweshouldalsobecarefulnottounderstandthisungroundingcharacterofgroundasanabsenceofgrounding.Inotherwords,ungroundingisbeingspokenofinthetransitionfrommetaphysicsandisthereforenotmeantasagroundinthemetaphysicalortranscendentalsenseatthesametime,itisintroducedintheconcretesenseofageschichtlicheGrndung,aconcretelivingoccurrencethatisnotanimmovablegroundbutdoesoccurasgroundinginthefulltemporalandfinitesense.
Theabground,orungroundingofbeyng,occursasatwofoldmotion.ItoccursasEntrckungandasBerckung.50Entrckungreferstothewithdrawingaspectofthetruthofbeyng,51whereasBerckungreferstotherisingorcomingoutthatoccursinthatwithdrawal.AsifIweretounderstandmybeinghere,nowtemporallyandspatiallyasasinglepassageconstitutedbythisfallingrising,i.e.,notasthebeingofanentitythatcanexerciseitsgravitybyfallingandreactwithastonishment,52notasanentitybetweendeathandlife,butastheoccurrenceofbeinginsinglepassageincomingtobeincomingtopass.Itisthisfallingrisingmotionofbeyngthatcharacterizesbeynghistoricalthinking.Itisinthismotionintheoccurrenceofbeyngthatbeynghistoricalthinkingappearsasthethinkingofbeyng,athinkingfromenowning(vomEreignis).
Itisintheresounding(Anklang)ofthisfallingrisingofbeynginitsessentialswaythatbeynghistoricalthinkingoccurs(ereignet).53Atthesametime,thisthinkingisanenactingthinkingbecauseitoccursinthisresoundinginatimespaceplayinwhichbeyngsessentialswayisheldopentoitspossibility.Thisdoublemotionofbeingheldinthesoundingoutofbeyngandholdingopeninthisattentivenessthepossibilityofitseventisthewaybeynghistoricalthinkingcanbeunderstoodfromenowning(Ereignis).54Heideggerindicatesthisdifficultplayofbeyngandbeynghistoricalthinkinginsection21,InceptualThinking(ProjectingOpen),wherehesays,Theprojectingopenunfoldsthethrowerandatthesametimeseizesitwithinwhatopensup.55
WhenHeideggersaysthatunderstoodinceptually,beginning(Anfang)isbeyngitself(istdasSeynselbst),56heispointingpreciselytothisdoubleplay,totheveryoccurrenceofbeynginEreignis(enowning)astheopeningheldfastbytheinsistenceofathinkingquestioningthatinitsremainingwiththequestioniscaughtandheldbytheprojectingopenofbeynginitsunfolding.TherootofAnfangisfangen,averbthatmeanscapturing,holding.Anfangisbeyngitselfasitoccursinthe
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page59
beingheldandholdingintheopennessofitsessentiallyswayingungroundedgroundingoccurrence.Theword,beginning,understoodinceptiblymarksthepassingfallingrisingmotionofbeyngasheldopeninitspossibilitybybeynghistoricalthinking.
Thecharacterofbeynghistoricalthinkingasinceptualthinking(anfnglichesDenken)isthereforetwofold.Beynghistoricalthinkingoccursoutoftheessentialswayinginthetruthofbeyng.Butasthistruthoccursasenowning(Ereignis),inthefallingrisingofitsoccurrence,beynghistoricalthinkingisathinkingenactingofthisungroundingmotion,athinkingthatwouldletresoundinitsopennessapassing,ratherthanpresentastoryaboutbeingsoranymetaphysicalortranscendentalsystem.
Thatwhereupontheleap,inopeningup,leapsfirstbecomesgroundthroughtheleaptheselfbecomesproperlyitsownintheleap57
IfweweretothinkfromEreignis,intheoccurrence(Geschehen)ofbeyng,ifweweretothinkfromwithinthemotionofthepassageofbeyng,werewetothinknothing,wewouldhavetothinkinthefaceofthedifficultyoftheungroundedcharacterofbeyng,andalsotherefore,intheawarenessoftheungroundingcharacterofitsthinking,thethinkingofbeyng.Thismeansthatthinkingwouldoccurinutterplay,inafreefallingleapthatwouldoccurinitsfreefalling,bothinandoutoftheveryenactmentofitsungroundedgrounding.And,itwouldmean,almostattheend,thatthinkingwouldremaininthatunbridgeableleap(Sprung)appearinginourspeaking,makingpresentandinthatnothingnessoutofwhich,andinattunementtowhich,anyspeakingwouldoccur.Beynghistoricalthinkingwouldthenbethisspeakinginthepassingswayofbeyng.
EnactmentsofBeyng
Theovercomingmotionofbeynginitspassingcallsnotforastoryaboutbeings58butforanenactment(Vollzug)59thatassuchwouldremainintheopennessofthispassingbyundergoingthefallingrisingofbeynginitsoccurring(Geschehen).Contributionsoccursassuchenactment.ThisiswhatHeideggerindicateswheninthelastsentenceofthefirstpagehesaysthatthethinkingsayingthatbelongstotheenowningofbeyngisthewordofbeyng[indasWortdesSeyns].60InTheHistoryofBeyngHeideggerhasmoretosayabouttheofbeyng.Hesays,
4.thewordofbeyng.5.thebeynghistoricalgenitive(Notgenitivusobjectusandsubjectus).61
Ofismeanttoindicatetheopennessofthinkinginitsenactment,
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page60
initsattempting(Versuch)athinkingthatinitspassageisenownedbyitscomingtobeinpassingawayinbeyng.ItisbeynghistoricalthinkingthatContributionsenactswithitsfugalstructure:abookwrittenasarepeatingofthesamebeginningineachofitssixsections,ormovements.62Thesemovementsarenotgatheredintoasystem.Rather,theyremainintheopenplayofthetemporalityofthepassageofbeyngbygivingthesesixvariations.Inunderstandingbeynghistoricalthinkinginitstemporality,onewouldthinkthatContributionsisneitherasystem,norahandfulofmeditations,butaworkunifiedinitsremainingintheveryopennessofthepassingofbeyng,inremainingintheawarenessofaleapthatwouldalwaysbeunreachedinitsownevent.
Butif,asIhavesuggested,Contributionsenactsthetemporalizingpassageofbeyngsessentialsway,itdoessoconcretely.Thisisprimarilywhatenactmentwouldsuggest,athinkingundergoingofbeynginitspassingmotion.Indeed,HeideggerindicatesinthesectionofContributionstitledGrndungthatitiswiththeholdingopenofthequestionofbeynginitsspacetimeleeway(ZeitRaumSpiel)thatthedecision(Entscheidung)ofbeyngsessentialswaywouldoccur.63Inspeakingofbeynghistoricalthinking,wehavebeenspeakingintheconfiguringmotionofbeynginitsconcreteoccurring.Thismotionstandsoutsidethematerialidealdualismofmetaphysicsandtranscendentalphilosophiesandatthesametimeplacesthinkingintheveryoccurrenceofbeyngsessentialswayintheconfiguringpassingofwords,worksofart,things,bodies,identities,communitiesallofwhichnowremainstobethought.
Notes
1.GA65,3CP,3.Forbibliographicalinformationonthetextsreferredtohere,seetheintroductiontothisvolume,note1.WhenIusemyowntranslationofentirepassagesorparticularterms,IgivetheEmad/Malytranslationinanote.
IhavechosentotranslateSeynasbeyngandnotasbeing.ThischoiceisinpartawayofmarkingtheleapHeideggerismakingfromSeintoSeyn,wherethetermsalthoughdifferentiated,stillrecalleachother.
2.Thisisalreadyannouncedinthesameparagraphabove,whereHeideggerspeaksofthematterthatisalreadyintimatedbythetitleofthework:AberderffentlicheTitelentsprichtauchinsofernderSache.
3.IhavechosentouseStambaughstranslationofHistorieasHistoriography,andofGeschichteashistory.SeeMartinHeidegger,BeingandTime,trans.JoanStambaugh(Albany:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress,1996.)AsEmadandMalypointout,differentiatingthesetwotermsiscentraltothereadingofContributions.Thetranslatorsmarkthisdifferencebyusinghistoryforbothwords,buttheyindicateHistoriebywritingitinparenthesesfollowingtheEnglishwordhistory(TranslatorsForeword,CP,xxiixxiii).Ihavealsoadded
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page61
occurrencetoStambaughsuseofhistoryfortheGermanGeschichte.ThisIfindhelpfulinatleasttwoways.First,thiswordreferstoevent,incident,andepisode.ThusthetemporalandpassingcharacterofGeschichte,aswellasitsparticularityastheoccurrenceofbeyngareputintoplay.Also,occurrencerelatesGeschichtetoEreignisinthesenseoftheopeningofbeynginitsparticulargivenness,andnotonlyintermsofEreignisasEvent,awordthatalreadysuggeststheplacementoftheGeschichtedesSeynsandseynsgeschichtlichesDenkenintoagrandhistoriographicalscale.
4.ThetranslationofWesenandWesungrequirescarefulconsideration,givenHeideggersparticularandvarioususesoftheseterms(seeEmadandMalysdiscussionintheirforeword,CP,xxivxxvi).AsEmadandMalypointout,thechoiceofessentialswayandessentialswaying,respectively,isnotidealbutitdoespointbothtothedynamiccharacteraswellastotheparticularphysicalityoftheoccurrenceofbeyng.WhenIspeakofphysicality,ImeantheresonanceofphusisthatisalwaysatplayinHeideggersbeynghistoricalthinking.HowWesungbringsthisphysicalityintoplaymaybeinferred,forexample,fromthefactthatinGermanusage,WesungisnotidentifiedwithsuchanontologicaldeterminationofbeingasthatindicatedbydasWesen,atermtraditionallyusedinGermanasanalogoustoessentiaeandindirectcontrasttoabeingsparticularwayofbeingorDasein.Wesunginsteadrecallspreciselythediverseconfiguringsofparticularlivingprocesses,as,forexample,inthewordVerwesung,whichmeansdecayordecomposition.
5.ThroughoutthisessayIspeakofpresenceasthepresenceofentitiesathand(Anwesen),andofappearingastheveryoccurrenceofappearing.
6.GA65,3CP,3.
7.Ibid.
8.GrundfragenderPhilosophie,GA45,133.
9.MartinHeidegger,Nietzsche:DereuropischeNihilismus(Pfullingen:GntherNeske,1989),p.25.MartinHeidegger,Nietzsche,vol.3,trans.FrankA.Capuzzi,DavidFarrellKrell,andJoanStambaugh,ed.DavidFarrellKrell(SanFrancisco:HarperSanFrancisco,1987),p.5.
10.EreignistranslatedasenowningreferstotheoccurrenceofbeyngasthoughtinContributions.
11.Heidegger,Nietzsche,ed.BrigitteSchillbach,vol.1,GA6.1(FrankfurtamMain:VittorioKlostermann,1996),pp.6465Heidegger,Nietzsche,vols.12,ed.Krell.
12.MartinHeidegger,SeinundZeit(Tbingen:MaxNiemeyerVerlag,1986),p.6(BeingandTime,trans.Stambaugh,p.5).
13.MartinHeidegger,DieGeschichtedesSeyns,ed.PeterTrawny,GA69(FrankfurtamMain:VittorioKlostermann,1998),p.173.
14.Ibid.,p.168.
15.InbringingtogetherHeideggersthoughtandNietzsches,wefindadifficultdoublestandard.Ontheonehand,HeideggerclaimsthatNietzschesthinkingremainsmetaphysicalintheformofthedoctrineofthewilltopower.Ontheotherhand,readotherwise,Nietzschesthoughtseemstoenactaselfovercomingmotionthatleadsitbeyondmetaphysics,onethatwefindinHeideggersthoughtinContributions.ItisthenaquestionnotonlyofNietzscheasthelastmetaphysicianandHeideggerasthethinkeroftheotherbeginning
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page62
itisalso,andmoreinterestingly,aquestionofhowmuchofametaphysicalreadingNietzschesthoughtacceptsandhowmuchofaNietzscheanreadingHeideggersthoughtwithstands.Itisineachcaseaquestionofthinkingatthelimit.Inotherwords,thequestionoftherelationbetweenthesetwothinkersbelongstothelimitofthoughtinwhatgivesitselftobethoughtoutofthehistoryofbeyng(DieGeschichtedesSeyns),anditwouldonlybeincomingtothisbeynghistoricalthinking(seynsgeschichtlichesDenken)thatthequestioncouldbethoughtbyus.WefindHeideggersownattemptinhis1943lectureNietzschesWord:GodIsDead,alecturethatbringstogetherHeideggersworkonNietzscheduringtheyearsofthecompositionofContributions.(SeeMartinHeidegger,NietzschesWortGottistTod,inHolzwege,ed.FriedrichWilhelmvonHerrmann,GA5[FrankfurtamMain:VittorioKlostermann,1977]NietzschesWord:GodIsDead,inTheQuestionConcerningTechnologyandOtherEssays,trans.W.Lovitt[NewYork:Harper,1977]).
16.Thefivemainrubricswehavementionednihilism,evaluationofthevalueshitherto,willtopower,eternalrecurrenceofthesame,andovermaneachportrayNietzschesmetaphysicsfromjustoneperspective,althoughineachcaseitisaperspectivethatdefinesthewhole(Heidegger,Nietzschevol.4,Nihilism,FrankA.Capuzzi,ed.DavidFarrellKrell(SanFrancisco:HarperCollins,1987),p.9Heidegger,Nietzsche:DereuropischeNihilismus,vol.2,p.40.
17.Seenote4above.
18.Seenote2above.Cf.GA65,5CP,4:DasbergnglicheDenkenleistetdengrndendenEntwurfderWahrheitdesSeynsalsgeschichtlicheBesinnung.
19.Seenote17above.
20.GA65,32CP,23.GeschichtehiernichtgefatalseinBereichdasSeiendenunteranderen,sonderneinzigimBlickaufdieWesungdesSeynsselbst.
21.HistorischesWrterbuchderPhilosophie,vol.3,ed.J.Ritter(Darmstadt:WissenschaftlicheBuchgesellschaft,1974),p.352.
22.Ibid.:dasmomentane,zuflligeEreignis,derAnfangirgendeinesGeschehens.
23.Ibid.ThewordthatistranslatedintotheLatineventus,fromwhichwegetevent,isnotgiskehtbutanaskiht.GiskehtistranslatedintoLatinascasus.
24.Ibid.:nichtnurdieeinmaligeTatundSache,sondernaucheingrererEreigniszusammenhang.
25.Ibid.,pp.39899.WithregardtoDilthey,seesection77ofBeingandTime.
26.Heidegger,BeingandTime,trans.Stambaugh,Introduction,part2,section69,p.332SeinundZeit,p.305.SeealsoBeingandTime,Introduction,section6,TheTaskofDeconstructingtheHistoryofOntologyand,partII,chapter5,sections7277:TemporalityandHistoricity.
27.HereitisamatteroftakingHeideggerswordsconcerningBeingandTimeandtheturn(Kehre)mostrigorously.In1949,forthesecondeditionofVomWesenderWahrheit(1930),Heideggerappendstwofinalparagraphstotheearlierversion.ThereHeideggersays,DieAntwortaufdieFragenachdemWesenderWahrheitistdieSageeinerKehreinnerhalbderGeschichtedesSeyns(Theresponsetothequestionoftheessenceoftruthisthesayingofa
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page63
turninginthehistoryofbeyng).Heideggerslanguageclearlyplaceshisthinkinginthethirties,andeveninBeingandTime(seethefinalparagraphofthe1949edition,beginning,DieentscheidendeFrage[SeinundZeit,1927]),withinthequestionofthehistoryofbeyng.HeideggerisnotonlysayingthisbuthemarksitbyusingSeyn,thearchaicformofSeinthatmarksHeideggersthinkinginContributions.Itwouldthenbepossible,andperhapsnecessary,notonlytoreadHeideggersthoughtasamotionfromearlytopostturnHeidegger,buttoreadbackwards,i.e.,forexample,lookingatBeingandTimeinthelightofHeideggersthoughtintheearlythirtiesandinContributions.(SeeOntheEssenceofTruth,BasicWritings,trans.JohnSallis,ed.DavidFarrellKrell[SanFrancisco:HarperCollins,1993]VomWesenderWahrheit[1930],Wegmarken[FrankfurtamMain:VittorioKlostermann,1978].)
28.GA65,34CP,34:DieBeitrgefragenineinerBahn.
29.Thistranslationkeepsthesenseofmotionofthecomingtobeinpassingofbeyng.ThereisinHeideggeracrucialdifferencebetweentheoccurrenceoftheopeningofbeyngasgiveninGreekexperience,phusis,andthemetaphysicalinterpretationofthisgivingnessthroughalogosofobjectivepresenceandcalculation.ThisawarenessofthedoubleplayofthetruthofbeyngintheGreekbeginningispresentthroughoutHeideggersthinkingconcerningGreekphilosophy.
30.Aletheia(Heraklit,Fragment16)(summersemester,1943),VortrgeundAufstze(Pfullingen:GntherNeske,1985),pp.16366Aletheia(Heraclitus,FragmentB16),EarlyGreekThinking,trans.DavidFarrellKrellandFrankA.Capuzzi(NewYork:HarperandRow,1975),p.114.Cf.MartinHeidegger,DerAnfangdesabendlndischenDenkens.Heraklit(summersemester,1943),inHeraklit,ed.ManfredS.Frings,GA55(FrankfurtamMain:VittorioKlostermann,1979),pp.12731.
31.GA65,34CP,35.
32.GA65,3CP,3.
33.WemightthinkhereofHeideggersdiscussionofthebridgeinBuilding,Dwelling,Thinking:Thebridgegatherstoitselfinitsownwayearthandsky,divinitiesandmortals.thebridgedoesnotfirstcometoalocaltostandinitratheralocalcomesintoexistenceonlybyvirtueofthebridge.Bythissitearedeterminedtheplacesandpathsbywhichaspaceisprovidedfor.Evenifthoughtweretoenactabridge,itwouldbethisthinkingthatwouldoccurasthegatheringforpastandfuture,anditwouldhavetobethoughtassuch.SeeBuilding,Dwelling,Thinking,BasicWritings,ed.Krell,pp.35363BauenWohnenDenken,VortrgeundAufstze,pp.14656.
34.GA65,5,translationminecf.CP,4.
35.Seesections2024:GA65,5561CP,3843.Cf.DerAnfangderabendlndischenPhilosophie(summersemester,1932),GA35.Throughoutthisessay,IhavefollowedtheEmad/MalytranslationofanfnglichasinceptualandanfnglichesDenkenasinceptualthinkingIhavedonesoinordertopointtothedynamicorpassingcharacteroftheoccurrencebeingthoughtandtothecharacterofthisthinkinginwhatHeideggercallstheleap(Sprung).
36.GA65,58,translationminecf.CP,41:Itistheessentialswayingofbeingitself.Butthisbeginningfirstbecomesenactableastheotherbeginningwhenthefirstbeginningisputintoproperperspective.Graspedinceptually,thebeginningisbeingitself.
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page64
37.Insection117ofDieGeschichtedesSeyns(GA69),Heideggeralsostates,Thehistorical[historisch]neverletshistoryitself[Geschichte]beexperienced,letalonethought.Thisneitherresolvesnoreliminatesbutratheropensthequestionofthegatheringofthehistoricalinthinking.Foradiscussionofthisissue,see,forexample,PeterWarneksReadingPlatobeforePlatonism(AfterHeidegger),ResearchinPhenomenology27(1997).
38.HeideggerhasalreadymadethismoveinOntheEssenceofTruth(BasicWritings,ed.Krell)VomWesenderWahrheit(1930),Wegmarken.
39.HansGeorgGadamer,Plato,inHeideggersWays,trans.JohnW.Stanley(Albany:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress,1994)HeideggersWege(Tbingen:J.C.B.Mohr,1983).
40.LeonardoSamona,LAltroIniziodellaFilosofia,GiornalediMetafisica,NewSeries12(1990):80.
41.DieGeschichtedesSeyns(19381940),GA69,173.Cf.Heidegger,TheAnaximanderFragment,inEarlyGreekThinking,p.36DerSpruchdesAnaximander(1946),Holzwege,GA5,34549.
42.CharlesE.Scott,TheTimeofMemory(Albany:StateUniversityofNewYorkPress,1999).
43.WefindaformulationofthismotionalreadyinBeingandTime,whereHeideggerdiscussesitastheDestruktionderGeschichtederOntologie,section6,pp.1927.
44.GA69,168.
45.Inspeakingofpassageandthetruthofbeyng,wearealreadyapproachingthemotionofwithdrawalthatIdiscussinthenextsectionofthisessay.
46.GA65,3,translationminecf.CP,3.
47.InContributions,HeideggerspeaksoftheknftigeDenken(GA65,3)Thisdoesnotmeanthethinkingofafuturethatliesaheadrather,itreferstotheZukunft(future)initsdoublesenseofcomingtoandarrival,Ankunft.
48.GA65,18CP,14.
49.GA65,383CP,267.
50.GA65,385CP,268.
51.Heideggerhadalreadyintroducedthisthoughtofthewithdrawalofbeynginthethirties,inhisdiscussionsoftheGreektermaletheia,wherethelethicelementoftruthisfirstbroughttothequestionofthetruthofbeing.SeeGA65,329CP,23031.
52.Theastonishment(thaumadzein)oftheGreeksisforHeideggerthereductiveeventthatgroundsthefirstbeginning,i.e.,traditionalontologyandmetaphysics.HeideggertranslatestheGreektermasErstaunen(GA65,20CP,15).ThistermcanbecontrastedwithdasErschrecken,dieVerhaltenheit,anddieScheu,thegroundattunementsofthinkingintheotherbeginning.SeeGA65,14CP,11.
53.GA65,385CP,267.
54.GA65,386CP,268.
55.GA65,56CP,39.
56.Seenote39above.
57.GA65,303CP,214:Thisisgroundedintheleap.Thatuntowhichtheleapleapsinenopeningisfirstgroundedbytheleap.theselfonlybecomesitsownintheleap.
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984
-
Page65
58.SeinundZeit,p.6BeingandTime,trans.Stambaugh,p.5.
59.GA65,11CP,7.
60.GA65,3CP,3.
61.DieGeschichtedesSeyns,GA69,170.
62.GA65,1011CP,79.
63.SeepartV,GA65,37188:DieGrndung,DerZeitRaumalsderAbgrundCP,25976:Grounding,TimeSpaceasAbground.Cf.section5,GA65,17CP,13.OnEntscheidung,seeGA65andCP,section5partIII,dasZuspiel(PlayingForth)partVIII,sections266,268.
Copyright 2001. Ind
iana University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable
copyright law.
EBSCO Publishing : eBook Collection (EBSCOhost) - printed on 5/6/2015 2:48 AM via UNIV OF CHICAGOAN: 66554 ; Scott, Charles E..; Companion to Heidegger's Contributions to PhilosophyAccount: s8989984