better cities, better economies

Upload: urbanway

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Better Cities, Better Economies

    1/5

    12 Asia-Pacifc

    Housing Journal

    Urban population grew from 220 million to

    2.8 billion in the 20thcentury. The next few

    decades will see an unprecedented scale of

    urban growth. By 2030, this is expected to

    expand to about 5 billion.

    Such rapid urban expansion will be

    particularly notable in Africa and Asia whereurban population will double between

    2000 and 2030. By 2030, the towns and

    The world reached a turning point in 2008. For the first time in history, more than half its

    human population, 3.3 billion people, lived in urban areas.

    cities of the developing world will make up

    81 percent of urban humanity.

    Economic growth and urbanization are

    often positively linked. Cities are the driving

    force for economic development. Economic

    growth also stimulates urbanization. These

    positive relationships are clear in manycountries.

    Xing Quan Zhang, PhD

    1This story is adapted from Zhangs article in Urban World, Volume 2, Issue 4, September 2010

    Better cities,

    better economies1

  • 8/12/2019 Better Cities, Better Economies

    2/5

    Asia-Pacifc

    Housing Journal13

    Better Cities, Better Lives

    Urbanization andabsence of economicgrowth

    Urbanization can occur in the absence

    of economic growth. For example, in some

    sub-Saharan African countries, urbanization

    occured without of economic development.

    Its processes and patterns are differentiated

    by institutional settings and policies from

    country to country and region to region.

    Despite the growing importance of cities

    in world affairs and national economic

    development, the citys position is regarded

    as marginal to current debates and

    development controversies. Negative

    over-urbanization impacts such as the

    concentration of poverty, slums and social

    disruption in developing cities are often

    overemphasized.

    Cities the best hopeHowever, cities represent the best hope

    for growth and opportunities as engines

    of national economic development.

    They provide large efficiency benefits, which

    result in unprecedented productivity and

    competitiveness gains. They are centers of

    knowledge, innovation and production and

    services specialization.

    Cities facilitate creative thinking andinnovation. High concentrations of people in

    cities generate opportunities for interaction

    and communication and promote creative

    thinking, knowledge spillovers, new ideas

    and technologies.

    They also provide more learning and sharing

    opportunities and facilitate trade andcommerce by providing large market-places.

    Cities are production and services centers

    because goods and services are more

    efficiently produced in high-density urban

    environments.

    Cities also provide consumers with more

    goods and services choices and they are

    the agents of social, cultural, economic,

    technological and political change.

    These advantages make cities more

    productive than rural areas. No country

    has achieved sustained economic growth

    without the growth of cities.

    Driving force of nationaleconomies

    Cities are the driving force of national

    economies.

    They generate a disproportionately higherrate of economic growth than rural areas.

    In developed countries, cities have higher

    productivity per capita than rural areas.

    For example, Tokyo has 26.8 percent of

    the national population and produces

    34.1 percent of national GDP. London has

    20.3 percent of the population and accounts

    for 25.4 percent of GDP. Paris, with 16.2

    percent of the national population, accounts

    for 26.5 percent of the national GDP.

    Dublin with 25.9 percent of the population

    generates 32.8 percent of GDP. Auckland,

    Vienna and Helsinki generate about 50

    percent higher GDP than their respective

    population share.

  • 8/12/2019 Better Cities, Better Economies

    3/5

    14 Asia-Pacifc

    Housing Journal

    Engines of migrationCities in both developed and developing

    countries play crucial roles in driving

    national economic development.

    Statistics show that cities are much

    more productive than rural areas in

    developing countries.

    However, this does not mean that cities

    are more productive in developing

    countries. Productivity, is generally

    higher in developed countries cities.

    However the productivity gap and

    inequality of development between cities

    and rural areas are much larger in

    developing countries than in developed

    countries.

    The large economic productivity gap and

    imbalance of development between cities

    and rural areas in developing countries lead

    to enlarged rural and urban income gaps,

    which in turn encourages migration tocities to search for better opportunities and

    prosperity.

    The massive influx of rural populations to

    cities creates resource shortages to provide

    housing and services in cities. The engines

    of economic development then become

    engines of migration.

    Migration that out-paces economic

    development often results in urban slums.

    Manila, Karachi, Nairobi, Dhaka and Mumbaiare engines of economic development but

    they are also cities of slums.

    National economic growthThe contribution of cities to national

    economic growth is very significant in

    developing countries. The economic future

    of developing countries is highly dependent

    on the growth of its cities.

    However, cities are seriously under-resourced

    to fulfill their potential as drivers of national

    economic development and prosperity.

    Cities face many challenges, fromaccelerating growth, massive influx of

    rural migrants, deteriorating infrastructure,

    environmental degradation, social exclusion,

    violence, under-investment, lack of fiscal

    freedom and policy choices.

    Municipal governments often lack financial

    means to address the vast challenges facing

    them. For example, of the total government

    revenues in Canada, the federal government

    receives 39 percent; provincial governments

    receive 50 percent and municipal governmentsonly get 11 percent.

    Municipal governments in most countries

    have less than a quarter of total government

    revenues. In many countries such as

    Afghanistan, Armenia, Australia, Chile, Cyprus,

    El Salvador, Greece, Honduras, Iran, Jordan,

    Lesotho, Malta, Mauritius, Mongolia, Morocco,

    Paraguay, municipal governments receive

    less than 10 percent of the government

    revenues.

    The international development community

    also ignores the needs of cities. For example,

    the total urban assistance to developing

    countries from 1970 to 2000 was about $US

    60 billion, about $US 20 per capita - less than

    a dollar per capita per year.

  • 8/12/2019 Better Cities, Better Economies

    4/5

    Asia-Pacifc

    Housing Journal15

    Better Cities, Better Lives

    Cities need powers togenerate revenue

    To maintain vital economic growth and

    competitiveness cities (1) should have the

    power to generate revenues and make

    development decisions; (2) have sufficient

    investment to provide adequate infrastructure

    and services, such as transportation,

    communications, power supply, water and

    sanitation, housing, as well as financial and

    business services; (3) should develop and

    attract high quality human resources fortechnological innovation, entrepreneurship,

    and knowledge development; (4) should

    provide an enabling national environment

    for market development.

    Should we focus our attention on the

    development of cities and ignore the

    development of rural areas? The answer

    is no.

    The huge disparity and divide between

    cities and rural areas in terms ofproductivity and wealth are often signs of

    under-development. Developed countries

    experiences indicate that more balanced

    development between cities and rural

    areas occurs when national development

    reaches a higher level.

    Cities work better if they have between-cities

    efficiencies but also in-cities efficiencies.

    City regions

    City regions have emerged as most

    important growth poles. Transport and

    communications technology improvements

    stimulate rapid city region developments.

    As modern products and services become

    increasingly sophisticated, producers and

    service providers gain significant advantagesfrom new transaction networks.

    These networks facilitate products, services,

    technology and market information

    exchanges, and foster economic creativity

    and innovation. Network participants

    receive tremendous efficiency boosts by

    being part of tightly-linked and spatially-

    concentrated clusters.

    These networks, production and services

    modes foster the development of urbanagglomerations and city regions. Today,

    city regions have emerged as economic

    development driving-forces in many

    countries.

    For example, the Tokyo city region has more

    than 40 cities and towns with a population of

    33.2 million, and generates more than 34

    percent of national GDP.

    The Pearl River Delta in China has a

    population of 30 million. New York cityregion has a population of 22 million;

    Sao Paulo, 17.7 million; Mexico city region,

    17.4 million. Changjiang River Delta in China

    has emerged as the worlds largest city

    region with a population of about 100

    million, generating 26 percent of national

    GDP.

  • 8/12/2019 Better Cities, Better Economies

    5/5