best practices for fostering english literacy among esl

26
Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL Immigrant Students Olusola O. Adesope, Tracy Lavin & Terri Thompson Canadian Council on Learning

Upload: others

Post on 05-Oct-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy

among ESL Immigrant Students

Olusola O. Adesope, Tracy Lavin & Terri ThompsonCanadian Council on Learning

Page 2: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

2

Immigration in Canada

• Census 2006– 6,186,950 immigrants

– 19.8% of Canadian population

• Population growth

• Skilled workforce

Page 3: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

3

Do immigrant students face academic

obstacles?

• YES (Worswick, 2001)– Immigrant students do not perform as well as non-immigrant

students

– Unless they arrived in Canada before age 2

• NO (Zhou, 1997)– Perform at or above the levels of non-immigrant students

– Less likely to drop out of school

– More likely to pursue PS studies

Page 4: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

4

Do immigrant students face academic

obstacles?

• Overall, immigrant students are at least as successful

as non-immigrant—and often more successful (Thiessen, 2007)

• But some groups of ESL immigrant students face steep

challenges and achieve at dramatically lower levels

than other students (Garnett, 2008)

• Many immigrant students have trouble leveraging their academic success in the labour market

(Gilmore, 2008)

Page 5: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

5

Literacy

• Adult immigrants face significant literacy

barriers

• IALS (prose literacy):– 280 vs. 245

– 43% vs. 64% below Level 3

Page 6: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

6

Relevant factors

• ESL Status– ESL learning may pose literacy difficulties

– Counterbalanced by the cognitive benefits of bilingualism?

• Country of Origin– Immigrants’ country of origin seems to be related to

achievement

• Academic domain– Outcomes for ESL immigrant students differ across academic

domains.

Page 7: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

7

Research Questions

• What are the effects of different strategies in teaching English literacy to ESL immigrant students?

• How do these effects vary when strategies are used in

different settings and educational levels?

• How do teaching strategies affect different outcome

constructs such as reading, writing, comprehension and decoding?

• How are effect sizes conditioned by methodological features of the research?

Page 8: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

8

Search Strategy• Databases (N=3,692)

– Academic Search Premier

– PsycINFO

– Linguistic and Language Behavior Abstracts

– ERIC (including British and Australian ERIC)

– Web of Science

– Education Full Text

– Syntax: “ESL” OR “English as a second lang*” OR “immigrant students” OR “reading strategies” OR “meta*” OR “systematic review” …

• Hand Searching (N=75)

– Reference sections from meta-analyses and background reviews

Page 9: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

9

First Inclusion

• Two researchers reviewed the

– Titles

– Abstracts

– Keywords of all captured articles

• Applied inclusion criteria

• Performed double-screening

– Test reliability of the process

– 45 articles reviewed by 2 researchers

– Cohen Kappa was .88

Page 10: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

10

Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria

Program guidesEditorial / opinion piecesDescriptive studiesBooks

EmpiricalExperimental research

METHODOLOGY

Speaking is the only outcome measured

ReadingWriting

MEASURED OUTCOMES

Identified teaching strategies

INTERVENTION

ESDFrench Canadian SpeakersStudents with learning

disabilities

Immigrant ESL students in an English speaking country.

K-12Public or private schools

POPULATION

EXCLUSIONINCLUSION

Page 11: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

11

Second Inclusion

• Each study coded by two researchers

– Elimination based on selection criteria

– Data extraction based on pre-defined coding instructions /

manual

• Double-screening

– 38 randomly chosen articles randomly reviewed by 2 researchers

– Cohen Kappa was .92

Page 12: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

12

Result of Inclusion/Exclusion

Page 13: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

13

Extraction of the standardized mean difference

effect size

•Cohen’s d

dN

g )94

31(

−=

•We used Hedge’s g, the unbiased estimate of the effect size

Page 14: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

14

Extraction of the standardized mean difference

effect size

•Inverse variance weight w

•Weighted mean effect size

22)(2

)(2

gnnnn

nnnnw

cece

cece

++

+=

∑∑

=

i

ii

w

ESwES

)(

•Standard error of the mean

∑=

iES w

SE1

Page 15: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

15

Extraction of the standardized mean difference

effect size

•Confidence Intervals

•Homogeneity of variance statistic, Q

),(96.1

),(96.1

ESU

ESL

SEESES

SEESES

+=

−=

∑ −= .)(2

ESESwQ ii

Page 16: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

16

Are English Literacy Teaching Strategies

Effective?

Page 17: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

17

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

.76* 4426UK

.40*222,692USA

.193293Canada

.43*293,411All

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 18: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

18

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

.61*5525Writing

.294523Multimedia-Assisted

Reading

.39*161,758Systematic Phonics

/Guided Reading

.52*4605Collaborative Reading

Intervention

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 19: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

19

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

.58* 101,141Mixed Comprehension

and Decoding

-.15 4248Decoding

.38* 152,022Comprehension

Nature of Reading

.57*7682Writing

.38*222,729Reading

Outcome Constructs

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 20: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

20

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

.62* 3261Secondary (9-12)

.41* 6874Intermediate (4-8)

.41* 202,276Primary (K-3)

Educational Level

.162126Pull-Out Room

.48*252,729Classroom

Setting

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 21: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

21

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

.53* 101,263Mixed/Others

.19 3293French

.41*161,855Spanish

First Language

.561254High

.40*202,491Low

SES

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 22: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

22

Meta-Analysis:Studies comparing ESL best practices to traditional reading methods

-.09 2212Others

.65* 91,061Non-Random

.37*182,138Random

Assignment of

Participants

.38*212,426High

.54*8985Medium

Confidence in ES

Derivation

MkN

Effect size (g)

Page 23: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

23

Interpreting the meta-analysis

• Across several instructional conditions, settings and

methodological features:

– ESL interventions were associated with increased reading

and writing

– Reading and writing interventions produced a medium

effect on learning

• Effect moderated by first language of immigrants

– If French, intervention not significantly effective

– If Spanish or others, interventions were effective

Page 24: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

24

Implications

• ESL best practices in US and UK appear to work

better than those adopted in Canada.

• Interventions focused on decoding do not appear to be successful

• Re-evaluate practices, further research

Page 25: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

25

Thanks to our

• Director of Research and Knowledge Mobilization– Charles Ungerleider

• Information Retrieval Specialist– Will Durland

• Reviewer– Maggie Mak

• Funders– Canadian Council on Learning

– Canadian Language and Literacy Research Network

Page 26: Best Practices for Fostering English Literacy among ESL

26

Contacts

• Olusola [email protected]

• Tracy Lavin

[email protected]

• Terri [email protected]