benthic trawl studies in the south sound: 1987 vs. 2014/2015

31

Upload: nisqually-river-council

Post on 08-Jan-2017

138 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

•  Interagency program • Open-water disposal sites •  Evaluation procedures

• Disposal site monitoring

Anderson/Ketron Disposal Site

Non-dispersive

Established in 1989

360-480 feet deep

Relatively few biological resources

Dredged material stays on-site

A/K site now within the Reserve boundaries, though allowed under

management plan

DMMP determined additional monitoring important for future

disposal decisions

Disposal site

! Disposal site selection process included a benthic trawl study in 1987 ! Repeat the study using the same methodology ! Again focus on invertebrate species of potential “commercial and sport concern”

1. Evaluate biological resources in vicinity of site for any important changes since 1987

2. Compare invertebrate community at on-site stations to off-site stations

3. Compare on-site Dungeness crab and Pandalid shrimp densities to commercially viable thresholds used in 1987

Same 30 stations as 1987

PLUS

8 additional on-site stations

July 1987

October 1987

February 1987

May 1987

July 2015

October 2015

February 2016

May 2016

Water depth (a)

Distance behind vessel (b)

Beam trawl

 Placeholder for video file

Crab Pandalid Shrimp Sea Cucumbers

Sea Stars “Other”

•  Crabs •  Dungeness (Cancer magister) •  Red rock (C. productus) •  Graceful (C. gracilis) •  Tanner crab (Chionoecetes bairdi)

•  Pandalid shrimp •  Spot prawn (Pandalus platyceros) •  Dock shrimp (P. danae) •  Pink shrimp (P. jordani and P. eous)

•  Sea cucumber •  Giant California sea cucumber

(Parastichopus californicus) •  “Other” invertebrates

•  Including other genera of shrimp and crabs

 Nearly 50 species of (mostly) demersal fish  Most common: ◦ Blackbelly eelpout ◦ Roughback sculpin ◦ Plainfin midshipman

 Many different flatfish

 NO endangered species

CO Sole Pygmy poachers

Blackbelly eelpouts

Cancer gracilis

Cancer productus

Cancer gracilis

Cancer productus

Relative abundance of

“rock crab” species by depth

•  85% graceful rock crab (Cancer gracilis)

•  C. gracilis too small for harvest

July 2014

0

1

2

3

4

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

No.

Obs

erve

d

CW (mm)

Cancer magister Dungeness crab

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

CW (mm)

Cancer productus Red rock crab

Male Female

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

CW (mm)

Cancer gracilis Graceful crab

Mostly pink shrimp

on-site

February 2015

dock shrimp

coonstripe shrimp

pink shrimp

The disposal site is at this depth

spot prawn

February 2015

Biological Resource (Full Study Area)

Objective 1: Observed Change from

1987 to 2014-2015

CANCER CRAB

Dungeness Crab 2.5 times greater numbers in 2014-2015

Combined “Rock Crab” (C. productus and C. gracilis) Much more abundant in 2014-2015

Red Rock Crab (C. productus only)

Approximately 10 times more abundant in 2014-2015

PANDALID SHRIMPRecreational Pandalid Shrimp

(excluding Pink Shrimp) Much more abundant in 2014-2015

Pink Shrimp Much more abundant in 2014-2015

ECHINODERMS

Sea Cucumbers Only half the number in 2014-2015

Sea Stars Roughly equal numbers in both surveys

Biological Resource

Objective 2: Difference between On-Site

Stations and Off-Site Stations in 2014-2015?

Mean #/hectare over all seasons

On-Site Off-Site Dungeness Crab 1.1 9.4

Combined “Rock Crab” (C. productus and C. gracilis) 154.8 448.5

Pandalid Shrimp (all species) 834.1 5,154.6 Sea Cucumbers 0 88.9

Sea Stars 12.1 263.2

Biological Resource

Objective 3: On-site Density Exceeds the 1987 Commercial/Recreational Viability

Threshold?

CANCER CRABDungeness Crab No

Combined “Rock Crab” (C. productus and C. gracilis) No

Red Rock Crab (C. productus only) No

PANDALID SHRIMP

Recreational Pandalid Shrimp (excluding Pink Shrimp) No

Pink Shrimp Yes; but unlikely commercially viable according to WDFW

ECHINODERMSSea Cucumbers No

Chris Hunt NewFields Jasper Boas NewFields Charlie Eaton BioMarine Tom Putnam BioMarine Don Rothaus WDFW Don Velasquez WDFW George Peterson WDFW Mark O'Toole WDFW Laura Inouye Ecology Tom Gries Ecology

Celia Barton DNR Jamie Kligo DNR Betty Bookheim DNR Dawn Swanstrom DNR Birdie Davenport DNR David Fox USACE Lauran Warner USACE Kelsey van der Elst USACE Madelyn Martinez USACE Heather Fourie USACE Greg Jensen UW Shandra O'Haleck NMFS Erika Hoffman EPA Justine Barton EPA

http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Dredging/

Full report available:

Celia Barton [email protected]

Lauran Warner [email protected]