benefit concrete
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Benefit Concrete](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022071817/55ac57191a28ab7f6e8b47e8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Benefits of Using High-Frequency ForcedPulsed Waterjet for Refurbishing Delaminated
Concrete Structures
Figure 1 shows the photographs of the work done on
refurbishing the delaminated (deteriorated) concrete ceiling,
using VLN’s patented high-frequency forced pulsed waterjet
(FPWJ) machine. The location was underground parking
garage, Lester B Pearson Building, Ottawa. The success of
the job is quite evident from the photographs.
Prior to awarding this contract to VLN, Public
Works Canada (PWC) was getting the job done by employing
a chipper (hammer & chisel), sandblaster, at a cost of
$40/sq.ft. With the employment of VLN’s machine,
sandblasting was eliminated, and as removing the deteriorated
concrete was so fast (see Fig. 2), the cost was reduced to
about $10/sq.ft! Furthermore, there was no need to shut the
entire parking garage because, as shown in Fig. 1 (C), it was
only necessary to isolate working areas one at a time.
Before taking the R&D contract work for the PWC,
laboratory tests were conducted on several types of concrete.
Sample results on cutting with FPWJ and the corresponding
continuous waterjet (CWJ) are illustrated in Fig. 2. While
FPWJ removed 0.283-m /hr of hard concrete (not3
deteriorated), CWJ removed only 0.037-m /hr after four3
adjacent passes, both operating at identical conditions
(20,000-psi and power). In other words, to remove 1-m of3
concrete, FPWJ took only 3.5-hrs, compared to 27-hrs by the
CWJ. At a nominal wage of $25/hr, the contractor employing
the ubiquitous CWJ pays $675, and a visionary contractor,
who would use FPWJ, pays only $87.5 for the job of
removing 1-m of concrete. The savings does not end here!3
Savings in cost of Energy Consumption:
Total energy consumed by FPWJ: 387-kW.hr
Total energy consumed by CWJ: 2,490-kw.hr!
At the rate of $3.25/kW.hr (based on the rate charged
to VLN by Ottawa Hydro, which includes delivery charge,
GST, etc), the contractor would save a staggering $6,800 to
remove 1-m of concrete! AND,3
Abatement of Pollution (Based on the Data Provided by
CANMET)
2According to CANMET (a Department of Government of Canada), based on diesel fuel, CO loading of the environment is: 71-
kg/GJ of energy comsumption. Therefore:
2CO emission by the use of FPWJ: 99,000-kg
2CO emission by the use of FPWJ: 636,400-kg (staggering!)
This reduction, resulting by using FPWJ, must make any environmentalist happy (how about the proponents of Kyoto?)
Note: These results apply to all applications VLN has investigated, ranging from cutting rocks to removing hard coatings of paints.
Prepared by: Mohan Vijay, Ph.D., P.Eng., President, VLN Advanced Technologies, Ottawa, Canada (www.VLN-Tech.com).
Fig. 1. Refurbishing of delaminated (deteriorated) concrete from the
ceilings of underground multi-story buildings.
(A) Usual appearance of the ceiling with loose concrete and rusted
steel bars.
(B) VLN’s forced pulsed waterjet (FPWJ) at the underground
parking garage of External Affairs Building (Lester B Pearson) for
refurbishing delaminated concrete.
(C) FPWJ in the process of removing and cleaning the steel bars.
(D) Appearance of the refurbished delaminated area, showing the
clean steel bars.
Fig. 2. These results clearly show the benefit of using FPWJ
compared to continuous waterjet (CWJ), both operating at identical
operating conditions (pressure, power, etc).