bending the medical trend curve€¦ · bending the medical trend curve ... bending the curve at...
TRANSCRIPT
BENDING THE MEDICAL TREND CURVE STRATEGIES TO INCREASE QUALITY
AND
REDUCE COSTS
Elyse Kaplan & Erin O’Connor
Who We Are
Adventist HealthCare (AHC) is a not-for-profit health system based in Rockville,MD with approximately 7,000 employees and a $24m health plan budget.
Cammack LaRhette Consulting (CLC) is an innovative employee benefits and health care consulting firm with over 65 health care clients as well as other NFP and Fortune 100 client organizations.
Our work together spans more than a decade and has capitalized on our organizations’ innovation and willingness to be leading edge.
2
Learning Objectives
• Strategies for implementing cost savings initiatives without reducing plan coverage
• Case Study: Discover how Adventist HealthCare’s program was able to double employee/dependent engagement in preventative health management
• Find out how your company can consistently decrease spending year after year by integrating four key elements of management and strategy
3
Managing toward the Ideal
Our shared journey enabled AHC to:
• Leverage unique advantage as both employer and provider
• Model services delivery to improve health and utilization efficiency
• Prepare infrastructure for looming industry shifts
4
Four Fundamentals of Plan Management#1 Information
ManagementAggregate data from
disparate sources and organize it into useable
form
#4 Financial Management
Financial results are the outcome of the first
three steps and help measure success, areas
of concern, and risk
#2 Population ManagementIdentify health needs of the population using available data
#3 Individual ManagementTrained healthcare professionals working together to improve health by enhancing the quality and efficiency of healthcare services
Sequence is critical for success 5
Information Management Overview Diagram
6
7
Population Overview Summary
8
Individual Management: High-Risk Population
9
Population Risk Stratification Factors: What Makes Someone “High Risk” ?
• Assess 17 separate “trigger factors”
• Triggers include‒ Utilization patterns‒ # of unique medical provider interactions‒ Diagnostic codes
10
Chronically Ill
Healthy and Healthy with Habits/Conditions
Individual Management: Non-High Risk Population
Who We Are– Multi-unit health care delivery organization
• 3 Acute Care hospitals• Behavioral Health hospital• Rehabilitation hospital• Home Health organization
– In suburban area – Approximately 7,500 covered lives on the health plan
Where We Started– Recurring double digit cost increases– Unsustainable expense, threatening viability and competitiveness of benefit
offering
11
Bending the Curve at Adventist Healthcare
What We Did
• Phase I: “Traditional” focus - 2003 through 2007‒ “Low hanging fruit” in plan design‒ Membership in group prescription buying plan‒ Co-pays and co-insurance designed to drive “domestic” utilization
• Phase II: Data driven decision making and shared governance – 2006 through 2010‒ Treated the plan (HealthNet) as if it was it’s own entity with a separate P/L
‒ Operated by a cross-functional team comprised of CHRO, CFO, Benefits Director, Community Wellness Director, Managed Care Director
‒ Monthly meetings to review plan performance including financial performance, utilization trends and other issues and to discuss potential plan changes.
‒ Contracted with third part medical management technology solution
12
What We Did - continued
• Phase III: Movement toward proactive health management: 2007 through 2011‒ Third Party Health Management, using the data integration and medical management
technology to improve care management to provide the right care, not the least expensive care
‒ Driving participant engagement in wellness to improve early identification and mitigate risk‒ Smoking cessation programs as part of “Smoke-free campus” transition
‒ Bio-metric screening as part of annual benefits fair, achieving 35% penetration by offering $10 incentive
‒ 20% employee contribution discount for becoming/remaining tobacco-free in 2009
‒ 20% employee contribution discount for tobacco-free and HRA completion 2011
‒ 20% employee contribution discount for tobacco-free, HRA and bio-metric screening in 2012
13
Employee Engagement – What We Learned
• It begins at the top; senior Management support and have a passion for developing Health and Wellness policies and initiatives
• Messaging works– Strong messaging has resulted in approximately 25% of AHC colleagues getting
biometric screenings at their benefits fairs this year
– Multiple channels: webinars, e-newsletters, flyers, etc.
• Wellness programs help‒ 50% off fitness, cooking and smoking cessation programs (including dependents for
the smoking program) ‒ Free nutritional counseling ‒ Free diabetes and pre-diabetes education programs (no limit on number times an
employee can participate)‒ Biggest Loser Programs have also been promoted in the past
14
What We Achieved: Summary
15
2010 2003-2010Feb - July Avg % Var
Hospital Based ExpenseInpatient Hospital $64.52 3.23%Facility $20.16 3.19%Emergency Room $11.71 6.43%Other Outpatient Services $7.04 15.13%Sub Total $103.43 5.42%
Other Medical ExpenseRx $39.57 4.48%Evaluation & Management $32.66 7.91%Procedures $26.63 4.11%Medicine $26.38 2.80%Outpatient Radiology $27.06 7.67%Outpatient Laboratory $14.86 8.67%Anesthesia $8.90 3.87%Outpatient Pathology $4.79 7.88%Medical management $0.56 0.00%Undefined Services $1.85 -5.42%Ambulance $0.68 10.59%Dental $0.02 0.00%Sub Total $183.96 4.38%
Totals ($0.26 var) $287.39 4.94%
What We Achieved
16
Trending PMPM Statistics
2009 2010 March 2011
Members 7802 7825 7067
Medical PMPM $249.12 $258.74 $246.35
Rx PMPM $46.78 $42.57 $55.50
Total $295.90 $301.31 $301.85
Variation 1.8% -15.2%
A/G 1.13 1.13 1.13
CMI 1.14 1.22
What We Achieved
17
Category of Care PMPM
2009 2010 March 2011
Hospital Related $110.36 $112.96 $121.95
Professional $132.30 $139.55 $117.36
Rx $46.78 $42.57 $55.50
Other $6.46 $6.23 $7.04
Total $295.90 $301.31 $301.85
Measurement Detail
18
Claimants over $10,000
2009 2010 March 2011
Number of people 446 453 36
% of membership 5.72% 5.79% 0.51%
% of total paid 57.68% 60.06% 36.59%
Largest claimant $1,000,000 $633,755 $186,903
Avg cost per claimant $29,870 $31,940 $21,681
Measurement Detail
19
Medical Management Performance
2009 2010 March 2011
PMPM expense $5 $4 $7
$$ expense $437,811 $378,638 $52,070
Recorded savings $2,140,961 $2,022,454 $187,824
ROI 4.89 5.34 3.61
Total Episodes 2717 2860 469
Unique participants 1279 1251 303
Measurement Detail
20
Population Risk Stratification (4th or current Qtr)
2009 2010
High 422 6% 354 4%
Moderate 847 11% 813 10%
Low 1,875 24% 2,027 26%
No known risk 4,472 59% 4,747 60%
Total 7,616 100% 7,941 100%
The Next Level
• By 2008, AHC increases were consistently 5% below national averages• In 2009, the self-insured plan hit a “speed bump” – a 12% jump in
expenditures!• Analysis showed that over 80% of expenditures were in less than 5% of
covered lives• Led to recognition that Primary Care Physicians needed to be brought
into the process• Developed “Patient Centered Medical Home” pilot program
21
PCMH Pilot• HealthNet Steering Committee established four objectives:
‒ Help the high risk members improve their health
‒ Increase efficiency of healthcare delivery for these members
‒ Support PCP practices treating these members
‒ Moderate health plan cost escalation
• Focus: “poly users” – members who saw at least 15 different providers and had at least 9 prescribing physicians in the prior year
• Goal: Ensure these members, significant users of health services, receive the coordination necessary for their complex healthcare needs.
22
PCMH Pilot• Step One
‒ Identify high risk members to enroll in the pilot and the PCPs who would manage their care• Risk stratification• Poly user identification• PCP alignment
• Step Two‒ Establish outcomes measures
• Step Three‒ Physician support
• Information access• Personal Health Nurse support and care coordination
• Step Four– Payment alignment
• Step Five‒ Measure results‒ Lessons learned 23
Results• Pilot participants
‒ 46 “poly” members and 8 PCPs to manage their care needs
• PCP access to physician portal
‒ Performance summary for the identified group and
‒ Ability to drill into patient specific Clinical Claims Chart and Patient Synopsis Report
with drill down capabilities to identify specific gaps in EBM or other compliance issues
• Assigned PHN to manage care coordination and integration of other
professional health needs (e.g., Dietician, Pharmacist)
• PCPs paid for time with the patient and PHN care coordinator
24
Results - Healthier Members• High risk members seen by PCPs decreased by more than 48%
• Members moved into the moderate and low risk categories
25
Results - Efficient UtilizationCATEGORY OF CARE PER‐MEMBER‐PER‐MONTH (PMPM) COST
FOR 46 PILOT MEMBERS
Category of Care 2009 2010 Variance
Inpatient hospital $393.26 $268.44 ‐124.82
Prescription drugs $261.20 $246.52 ‐14.68
Medicine $363.10 $196.84 ‐166.26
Procedures $144.84 $124.27 ‐20.57
Facility $216.22 $118.88 ‐97.34
Evaluation & management $171.79 $89.94 ‐81.86
Outpatient radiology $194.32 $73.27 ‐121.05
Outpatient laboratory $72.78 $52.78 ‐20.00
Anesthesia $43.84 $42.22 ‐1.62
Emergency department $29.40 $27.54 ‐1.86
Outpatient pathology $50.70 $23.52 ‐27.17
Other outpatient services $5.42 $17.50 12.08
Medical management $19.67 $5.51 ‐14.16
Undefined services $13.86 $1.77 ‐12.09
Ambulance $0.67 $1.22
Totals $1,981.07 $1,290.22 ‐690.86
• Spending in most of the categories of care declined for the pilot participants, while the utilization cost for all other HealthNet members rose slightly
• Pilot participants per member per month (PMPM) expense, including Rx, dropped 35%
‒ from $1,981 in 2009 to $1,290 in 2010
‒ PMPM for non-participants increased 0.9% from $296 (2009) to $299 (2010)
• Return On Investment (ROI)
‒ Total pilot costs $31,204 vs. directly recorded savings of $87,365 = ROI of 2.79
‒ Annual PMPM cost reduction of $381,630, which represents ROI of 12
‒ Excluding Rx, total claim dollars of high risk participants dropped from $949,890 in 2009 to $576,130 in 2010; PMPM declined 39% for an ROI of 4.3 27
Results – Cost Savings
Application & Next Steps• AHC/HealthNet sees broader application to the population
‒ EMR adoption‒ Pay-for-performance models for PCPs‒ Increasing PHN services‒ Increasing PCP use of tools and reports‒ Member accessibility to health information and resources‒ HRA links
• How does this apply to corporate employers?‒ Health care is delivered locally‒ Partnering with local providers‒ Carving out services in your employee benefit plan‒ Driving outcomes‒ Value based insurance design
28